title: Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Few studies that meticulously match individual lymph nodes seen on MRI with their precise histologic counterparts after total mesorectal excision have been reported.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to determine whether preoperative MRI could detect lymph node metastases accurately in the node-by-node analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a prospective, observational cohort study.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted at a tertiary-care hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty patients with rectal cancer were enrolled.
  
  
  METHODS
  Specimens were assessed using MRI for clinical staging. After surgical resection of the tumor, the specimens were again imaged with ex vivo ultrasound scan to localize the perirectal node. The locations of each lymph node were precisely matched with its corresponding magnetic resonance image to enable a node-for-node comparison of magnetic resonance images and histologic findings.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Agreement between MRI and histologic assessment of T stage was 82.5%. Of the 341 nodes harvested, 120 were too small (<3 mm) to be depicted on magnetic resonance images, and 18 of these contained metastasis (15%). A correlation between the results of MRI and histopathology was feasible for 205 lymph nodes, and the overall success rate of matching between the 2 techniques was 91.1% (205 of 221). Preoperative MRI revealed a node-by-node sensitivity and positive predictive value of 58.0%, and 61.7%. There was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy between the primary surgery subgroup and preoperative radiation subgroups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study is limited by its heterogeneity of cohorts including the subgroup with preoperative chemoradiation and the lack of preoperative ultrasound assessment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preoperative MRI was moderately accurate for the prediction of mesorectal lymph node metastasis. Moreover, preoperative MRI was insufficient for detecting small lymph nodes (<3 mm) with metastasis.
authors: 1Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea 2Department of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
authors: Jun Seok
authors: JS
authors: Park
authors: Yun-Jin
authors: YJ
authors: Jang
authors: Gyu-Seog
authors: GS
authors: Choi
authors: Soo Yeun
authors: SY
authors: Park
authors: Hye Jin
authors: HJ
authors: Kim
authors: Hyun
authors: H
authors: Kang
authors: Seung Hyun
authors: SH
authors: Cho
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011300:Preoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D012007:Rectum / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014463:Ultrasonography