title: Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is less invasive than surgical resection, but the large mucosal defects after ESD may lead to adverse events necessitating hospitalizations.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the use of an endoscopic suturing device for closure of large mucosal defects after ESD.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective, single-center study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twelve consecutive patients underwent ESD.
  
  
  METHODS
  All lesions were removed by using a previously described ESD technique. The large mucosal defects post-ESD were completely closed with the endoscopic suturing device, and all patients were discharged home with subsequent clinical and endoscopic follow-up.
  
  
  METHODS
  Bleeding and perforation rates after ESD with mucosal defect closure.
  
  
  RESULTS
  ESD followed by endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defects was performed in 12 patients (mean age, 64.7 ± 11.2 years, 4 lesions in the stomach, 8 lesions in the colon; mean lesion size, 42.5 ± 14.8 mm) over a period of 8 months. All lesions (100%) were removed en bloc. Closure of post-ESD defects with an endoscopic suturing device was technically feasible and fast (mean closure time, 10.0 ± 5.8 minutes per patient). Only 1 stitch (continuous suturing line) was required for complete closure in 8 patients. In the other 4 patients, the mucosal defect was closed with 2 to 4 separate stitches (mean number of sutures per patient, 1.6 ± 1.0). There were no immediate or delayed adverse events in any of the study patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Retrospective study.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Closure of large post-ESD defects with the Overstitch endoscopic suturing device is technically feasible and fast and can significantly decrease treatment cost by eliminating the need for hospitalization.
authors: Institute for Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
authors: Sergey V
authors: SV
authors: Kantsevoy
authors: Institute for Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
authors: Marianne
authors: M
authors: Bitner
authors: FBUZ Privolzhskij Area Medical Center FMBA Russian Federation, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia.
authors: Aleksandr A
authors: AA
authors: Mitrakov
authors: Institute for Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
authors: Paul J
authors: PJ
authors: Thuluvath
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D004210:Dissection; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005753:Gastric Mucosa / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007413:Intestinal Mucosa / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D061646:Operative Time; D010351:Patient Discharge; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D013536:Suture Techniques / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*