title: A study of incentives to support and promote public health accreditation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Accreditation of public health agencies through the Public Health Accreditation Board is voluntary. Incentives that encourage agencies to apply for accreditation have been suggested as important factors in facilitating participation by state and local agencies.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The project describes both current and potential incentives that are available at the federal, state, and local levels.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-nine key informants from local, state, tribal, federal, and academic settings were interviewed from March through May 2012. Through open-ended interviews, respondents were asked about incentives that were currently in use in their settings and incentives they thought would help encourage participation in Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Incentives currently in use by public health agencies based on interviews include (1) financial support, (2) legal mandates, (3) technical assistance, (4) peer support workgroups, and (5) state agencies serving as role models by seeking accreditation themselves. Key informants noted that state agencies are playing valuable and diverse roles in providing incentives for accreditation within their own states. Key informants also identified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other players, such as private foundations, public health institutes, national and state associations, and academia as providing both technical and financial assistance to support accreditation efforts.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  State, tribal, local, and federal agencies, as well as related organizations can play an important role by providing incentives to move agencies toward accreditation.
authors: Thielen Consulting, Fort Collins, Colorado (Ms Thielen and Dr Leff); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Division of Public Health Performance Improvement, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms Corso); National Association of County & City Health Officials, Washington, District of Columbia (Mss Monteiro and Fisher); and Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, Virginia (Mr Pearsol).
authors: Lee
authors: L
authors: Thielen
authors: Marilyn
authors: M
authors: Leff
authors: Liza
authors: L
authors: Corso
authors: Erinn
authors: E
authors: Monteiro
authors: Jessica Solomon
authors: JS
authors: Fisher
authors: Jim
authors: J
authors: Pearsol
mesh_terms: D000068:Accreditation / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D002487:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D006077:Government Agencies / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States