title: Procedural justice and the judge-probationer relationship in a co-occurring disorders court.
abstract: Although a considerable amount of research has been conducted on treatment-based courts, there is little quantitative evidence that describes the relationship between the judge and the probationer. The present study examines perceptions of the judge-probationer relationship (JPR), procedural justice, and outcome satisfaction within a co-occurring disorders court (CODC) in Orange County, California. Based on interview and survey data from a sample of probationers within the CODC (n=24), this article argues that perceptions of procedural justice are linked to perceptions of relationship quality between the judge and probationer. Analysis of the data found that probationers in the CODC have very positive views of their relationships with the judge, and elements of relationship quality are significantly linked with perceptions of procedural justice. Procedural justice is also a predictor of satisfaction with outcome in this sample. The results show promise that procedural justice and the quality of the judge-probationer relationship can positively affect probationers with co-occurring disorders in specialty courts.
authors: School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, 176 Messines Ridge Road, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia. Electronic address: m.knoxmahoney@griffith.edu.au.
authors: Myesa Knox
authors: MK
authors: Mahoney
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002140:California; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D057237:Criminals / Q000523:psychology*; D017831:Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry); D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D033222:Judicial Role; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000150:complications; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Co-occurring disorders; Dual diagnosis; Judge–probationer relationship; Procedural justice