title: Individual responses of mother sows to a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain lead to different microbiota composition in their offspring.
abstract: Pregnant gilts were fed the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB10415 (SF68) one month before birth of piglets. DNA extracts of sow faeces taken in weekly intervals as well as extracts from the intestine of their offspring during the suckling period at 12 and 26 days of life were analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative PCR. DGGE profiles of faecal bacterial communities from three out of six probiotic-fed sows were distinctly different from the control and other probiotic-fed sows at all time points after probiotic supplementation. The probiotic-fed sows and their offspring were therefore divided into non-responder (n=3) and responder (n=3) groups. The probiotic strain significantly increased faecal lactobacilli cell numbers in mother sows, which could be assigned to a significant increase of Lactobacillus amylovorus and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Responding sows showed a more pronounced increase than non-responding sows. Similarly, suckling piglets from non-responding and responding sows showed numeric and significant differences for different bacterial groups and species. DGGE profiles of suckling piglets from responding sows also grouped more closely than profiles from control animals. Non-metric multiscaling of suckling piglets showed the same tendency for suckling piglets, but not for post-weaning piglets. This study showed that the probiotic E. faecium strain modified the faecal microbiota of sows. This modification is carried over to their offspring, but leads to changes that do not mirror the quantitative composition in the mother sow. Individual variations in the bacterial composition of mother sows before probiotic feed intake may influence the impact of a probiotic in sows and their offspring.
authors: Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
authors: I C
authors: IC
authors: Starke
authors: Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Pieper
authors: Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Neumann
authors: Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Zentek
authors: Institute of Animal Nutrition, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 49, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
authors: W
authors: W
authors: Vahjen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics*; D058448:Biota; D058645:Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis; D016984:Enterococcus faecium / Q000254:growth & development*; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D005260:Female; D007422:Intestines / Q000382:microbiology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D019936:Probiotics / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D013552:Swine
keywords: DGGE; individuality; microbiota; piglets; probiotics