title: Cystic fibrosis: myths. mistakes, and dogma.
abstract: As a student I recall being told that half of what we would learn in medical school would be proven to be wrong. The challenges were to identify the incorrect half and, often more challenging, be willing to give up our entrenched ideas. Myths have been defined as traditional concepts or practice with no basis in fact. A misunderstanding is a mistaken approach or incomplete knowledge that can be resolved with better evidence, while firmly established misunderstandings can become dogma; a point of view put forth as authoritative without basis in fact. In this paper, I explore a number of myths, mistakes, and dogma related to cystic fibrosis disease and care. Many of these are myths that have long been vanquished and even forgotten, while others are controversial. In the future, many things taken as either fact or "clinical experience" today will be proven wrong. Let us examine these myths with an open mind and willingness to change our beliefs when justified.
authors: Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, U.S.A.. Electronic address: brubin@vcu.edu.
authors: Bruce K
authors: BK
authors: Rubin
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D003550:Cystic Fibrosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy*; D003657:Decision Making; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D008508:Medication Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*
keywords: Cystic fibrosis; Dogma; Myths; Treatment