title: Disentangling conscious and unconscious processing: a subjective trial-based assessment approach.
abstract: The most common method for assessing similarities and differences between conscious and unconscious processing is to compare the effects of unconscious (perceptually weak) stimuli, with conscious (perceptually strong) stimuli. Awareness of these stimuli is then assessed by objective performance on prime identification tasks. While this approach has proven extremely fruitful in furthering our understanding of unconscious cognition, it also suffers from some critical problems. We present an alternative methodology for comparing conscious and unconscious cognition. We used a priming version of a Stroop paradigm and after each trial, participants gave a subjective rating of the degree to which they were aware of the prime. Based on this trial-by-trial awareness assessment, conscious, uncertain, and unconscious trials were separated. Crucially, in all these conditions, the primes have identical perceptual strength. Significant priming was observed for all conditions, but the effects for conscious trials were significantly stronger, and no difference was observed between uncertain and unconscious trials. Thus, awareness of the prime has a large impact on congruency effects, even when signal strength is controlled for.
authors: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels, Belgium.
authors: Eva
authors: E
authors: Van den Bussche
authors: Astrid
authors: A
authors: Vermeiren
authors: Kobe
authors: K
authors: Desender
authors: Wim
authors: W
authors: Gevers
authors: Gethin
authors: G
authors: Hughes
authors: Tom
authors: T
authors: Verguts
authors: Bert
authors: B
authors: Reynvoet
keywords: awareness assessment; conscious processing; prime awareness; stimulus strength; unconscious processing