title: Pedicle-Based Non-fusion Stabilization Devices: A Critical Review and Appraisal of Current Evidence.
abstract: Over the last decades, spinal fusion has become one of the most important principles in surgical treatment of spinal pathologies. Despite the undoubted benefits of fusion surgery, there are several drawbacks associated with this technique, including adjacent segment degeneration and pseudoarthrosis. Based on biomechanical data, dynamic stabilization of the spine is intended to ameliorate adjacent level degeneration by stabilizing vertebral motion in defined planes and mimicking natural spine movements.In this paper, we review the literature and discuss past and present pedicle-based non-fusion dynamic stabilization devices. Although there is a paucity of high-quality prospective trials, studies have indicated both promising and disappointing results. In comparison to 360° fusion surgery, the perioperative risk seems to be lower. Other complications like screw loosening, however, have been reported with various systems, while a reduction of adjacent segment disease has not yet been demonstrated. The necessary degree of restabilization to achieve pain-free motion seems to vary greatly between patients and current systems are far from perfection. If these problems can be solved, dynamic stabilization may nevertheless be an important option of spinal surgery in the future.
authors: Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria, jochen.obernauer@uki.at.
authors: Jochen
authors: J
authors: Obernauer
authors: Pujan
authors: P
authors: Kavakebi
authors: Sebastian
authors: S
authors: Quirbach
authors: Claudius
authors: C
authors: Thomé
mesh_terms: D001863:Bone Screws; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013123:Spinal Fusion