title: When sex doesn't sell: using sexualized images of women reduces support for ethical campaigns.
abstract: Images of scantily clad women are used by advertisers to make products more attractive to men. This "sex sells" approach is increasingly employed to promote ethical causes, most prominently by the animal-rights organization PETA. Yet sexualized images can dehumanize women, leaving an unresolved paradox--is it effective to advertise an ethical cause using unethical means? In Study 1, a sample of Australian male undergraduates (N = 82) viewed PETA advertisements containing either sexualized or non-sexualized images of women. Intentions to support the ethical organization were reduced for those exposed to the sexualized advertising, and this was explained by their dehumanization of the sexualized women, and not by increased arousal. Study 2 used a mixed-gender community sample from the United States (N = 280), replicating this finding and extending it by showing that behaviors helpful to the ethical cause diminished after viewing the sexualized advertisements, which was again mediated by the dehumanization of the women depicted. Alternative explanations relating to the reduced credibility of the sexualized women and their objectification were not supported. When promoting ethical causes, organizations may benefit from using advertising strategies that do not dehumanize women.
authors.affiliation: University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Renata
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bongiorno
authors.affiliation: University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Paul G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Bain
authors.affiliation: University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Haslam
mesh_terms: D000329:Advertising; D017087:Animal Rights; D032981:Dehumanization; D004989:Ethics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012725:Sexual Behavior