title: Does interoceptive awareness affect the ability to regulate unfair treatment by others?
abstract: In this study we aimed to investigate how awareness of bodily responses, referred to as interoceptive awareness, influences decision-making in a social interactive context. Interoceptive awareness is thought to be crucial for adequate regulation of one's emotions. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine the association between interoceptive awareness and the ability to regulate emotions during interpersonal decision-making. Here, we quantified interoceptive awareness with a heartbeat detection task in which we measured the difference between subjective self-reports and an objective psychophysiological measurement of participant heart rates. Social decision-making was quantified using a two-round Ultimatum Game. Participants were asked to first reject or accept an unfair division of money proposed by a partner. In turn, participants could then make an offer on how to divide an amount of money with the same partner. Participants performed 20 rounds of the two-round Ultimatum Game twice, once during baseline condition and once while asked to reappraise emotional reactions when confronted with unfair offers from partners. Results showed that after reappraisal participants (1) accepted more unfair offers and (2) offered higher return divisions, as compared to baseline. With respect to interoceptive awareness, participants with better heartbeat detection scores tended to report less emotional involvement when they applied reappraisal while playing the Ultimatum Game. However, there was no reliably significant relationship between heartbeat detection and the acceptance of unfair offers. Similarly, heartbeat detection accuracy was not related to return offers made in the second round of the Ultimatum Game or the habitual use of emotion regulation. These preliminary findings suggest that the relationship between interoceptive awareness and behavioral changes due to emotion regulation in a social decision-making context appears to be complex.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School Brown University, Butler Hospital Providence, RI, USA ; Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.
authors.forename: Mascha
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: van 't Wout
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Faught
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences, Brown University Providence, RI, USA.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Menino
keywords: Ultimatum Game; decision-making; emotion; interoceptive awareness; reappraisal; regulation; social; unfairness