title: A critical review: a combined conceptual framework of severity of illness and clinical judgement for analysing diagnostic judgements in critical illness.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To analyse theoretical literature on severity of illness and clinical judgement and propose a combined conceptual framework for judgements taken to identify patients' clinical states in critical illness and also to critically review and synthesise general severity of illness prognostic models to identify dimensions and attributes of severity of illness in critical illness.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The effective treatment of the critically ill requires the early identification of severe illness, and in acute wards, this is predominantly addressed by applying early warning scores focusing on indicators of physiological severity. Clinical judgement complements the application of early warning scores, but is generally not the focus of research and so requires further investigation.
  
  
  METHODS
  A critical review of the literature.
  
  
  METHODS
  Severity of illness and clinical judgement literature was reviewed to identify themes for a combined conceptual framework for patient assessment in critical illness. MEDLINE and CINAHL (January 1981-December 2011) were searched for general severity of illness prognostic models in critical illness. Eleven research and five systematic review papers meeting review inclusion criteria were selected.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Severity of illness is found to be a crucial theoretical construct in critical illness. It can enhance descriptive models of clinical judgement (such as social judgment theory and an inference/correspondence model in diagnostic judgment) when used to analyse and reflect on judgements made to diagnose the clinical state of the patient.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A combined conceptual framework of severity of illness and a descriptive clinical judgement model further informs patient assessments about the identification of clinical states in critical illness, alongside early warning scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This article contributes to an understanding of the complexity of patient assessment and diagnostic judgement in critical illness.
authors.affiliation: Division of Nursing, Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
authors.forename: Margaret A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Coulter Smith
authors.forename: Pam
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Rosemary
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Crow
mesh_terms: D016638:Critical Illness; D006801:Humans; D011379:Prognosis; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
keywords: critical illness; diagnostic judgement; patient assessment; severity of illness