title: What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Numerous worksite health promotion program (WHPPs) have been implemented the past years to improve employees' health and lifestyle (i.e., physical activity, nutrition, smoking, alcohol use and relaxation). Research primarily focused on the effectiveness of these WHPPs. Whereas process evaluations provide essential information necessary to improve large scale implementation across other settings. Therefore, this review aims to: (1) further our understanding of the quality of process evaluations alongside effect evaluations for WHPPs, (2) identify barriers/facilitators affecting implementation, and (3) explore the relationship between effectiveness and the implementation process.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pubmed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane (controlled trials) were searched from 2000 to July 2012 for peer-reviewed (randomized) controlled trials published in English reporting on both the effectiveness and the implementation process of a WHPP focusing on physical activity, smoking cessation, alcohol use, healthy diet and/or relaxation at work, targeting employees aged 18-65 years.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 307 effect evaluations identified, twenty-two (7.2%) published an additional process evaluation and were included in this review. The results showed that eight of those studies based their process evaluation on a theoretical framework. The methodological quality of nine process evaluations was good. The most frequently reported process components were dose delivered and dose received. Over 50 different implementation barriers/facilitators were identified. The most frequently reported facilitator was strong management support. Lack of resources was the most frequently reported barrier. Seven studies examined the link between implementation and effectiveness. In general a positive association was found between fidelity, dose and the primary outcome of the program.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Process evaluations are not systematically performed alongside effectiveness studies for WHPPs. The quality of the process evaluations is mostly poor to average, resulting in a lack of systematically measured barriers/facilitators. The narrow focus on implementation makes it difficult to explore the relationship between effectiveness and implementation. Furthermore, the operationalisation of process components varied between studies, indicating a need for consensus about defining and operationalising process components.
authors.affiliation: Body@Work, Research Centre on Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands. debbie.wierenga@tno.nl.
authors.forename: Debbie
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wierenga
authors.forename: Luuk H
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: Engbers
authors.forename: Pepijn
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Van Empelen
authors.forename: Saskia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Duijts
authors.forename: Vincent H
authors.initials: VH
authors.lastname: Hildebrandt
authors.forename: Willem
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Van Mechelen
mesh_terms: D006293:Health Promotion / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D016272:Occupational Health; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D017132:Workplace