title: Comparison of alternative MS/MS and bioinformatics approaches for confident phosphorylation site localization.
abstract: Over the past years, phosphoproteomics has advanced to a prime tool in signaling research. Since then, an enormous amount of information about in vivo protein phosphorylation events has been collected providing a treasure trove for gaining a better understanding of the molecular processes involved in cell signaling. Yet, we still face the problem of how to achieve correct modification site localization. Here we use alternative fragmentation and different bioinformatics approaches for the identification and confident localization of phosphorylation sites. Phosphopeptide-enriched fractions were analyzed by multistage activation, collision-induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation (ETD), yielding complementary phosphopeptide identifications. We further found that MASCOT, OMSSA and Andromeda each identified a distinct set of phosphopeptides allowing the number of site assignments to be increased. The postsearch engine SLoMo provided confident phosphorylation site localization, whereas different versions of PTM-Score integrated in MaxQuant differed in performance. Based on high-resolution ETD and higher collisional dissociation (HCD) data sets from a large synthetic peptide and phosphopeptide reference library reported by Marx et al. [Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31 (6), 557-564], we show that an Andromeda/PTM-Score probability of 1 is required to provide an false localization rate (FLR) of 1% for HCD data, while 0.55 is sufficient for high-resolution ETD spectra. Additional analyses of HCD data demonstrated that for phosphotyrosine peptides and phosphopeptides containing two potential phosphorylation sites, PTM-Score probability cutoff values of <1 can be applied to ensure an FLR of 1%. Proper adjustment of localization probability cutoffs allowed us to significantly increase the number of confident sites with an FLR of <1%.Our findings underscore the need for the systematic assessment of FLRs for different score values to report confident modification site localization.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Biology, Functional Proteomics, University of Freiburg , 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Heike
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wiese
authors.forename: Katja
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kuhlmann
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wiese
authors.forename: Nadine S
authors.initials: NS
authors.lastname: Stoepel
authors.forename: Magdalena
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pawlas
authors.forename: Helmut E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Meyer
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Stephan
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Eisenacher
authors.forename: Friedel
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Drepper
authors.forename: Bettina
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Warscheid
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D045744:Cell Line, Tumor; D002852:Chromatography, Ion Exchange; D019295:Computational Biology; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010748:Phosphopeptides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D010766:Phosphorylation; D053719:Tandem Mass Spectrometry / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D010748:Phosphopeptides