title: Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
abstract: We examined whether normal aging spares or compromises cue-driven spontaneous retrieval processes that support prospective remembering. In Experiment 1, young and older adults performed prospective-memory tasks that required either strategic monitoring processes for retrieval (nonfocal) or for which participants relied on spontaneous retrieval processes (focal). We found age differences for nonfocal, but not focal, prospective-memory performance. Experiments 2 and 3 used an intention-interference paradigm in which participants were asked to perform a prospective-memory task (e.g., press "Q" when the word money appears) in the context of an image-rating task and were then told to suspend their prospective-memory intention until after completing an intervening lexical-decision task. During the lexical-decision task, we presented the exact prospective-memory cue (e.g., money; Experiments 2 and 3) or a semantically related lure (e.g., wallet; Experiment 3), and we inferred spontaneous retrieval from slowed lexical-decision responses to these items relative to matched control items. Young and older adults showed significant slowing when the exact prospective-memory cue was presented. Only young adults, however, showed significant slowing to the semantically related lure items. Collectively, these results partially support the multiprocess theory prediction that aging spares spontaneous retrieval processes. Spontaneous retrieval processes may become less sensitive with aging, such that older adults are less likely to respond to cues that do not exactly match their encoded targets.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Hillary G
authors.initials: HG
authors.lastname: Mullet
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Scullin
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Theodore J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Hess
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Rachel B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Scullin
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Kathleen M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Arnold
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Furman University.
authors.forename: Gilles O
authors.initials: GO
authors.lastname: Einstein
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D061212:Memory, Episodic; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D055815:Young Adult