title: The role of semantics, pre-emption and skew in linguistic distributions: the case of the un-construction.
abstract: We use the Google Ngram database, a corpus of 5,195,769 digitized books containing ~4% of all books ever published, to test three ideas that are hypothesized to account for linguistic generalizations: verbal semantics, pre-emption and skew. Using 828,813 tokens of un-forms as a test case for these mechanisms, we found verbal semantics was a good predictor of the frequency of un-forms in the English language over the past 200 years-both in terms of how the frequency changed over time and their frequency rank. We did not find strong evidence for the direct competition of un-forms and their top pre-emptors, however the skew of the un-construction competitors was inversely correlated with the acceptability of the un-form. We suggest a cognitive explanation for this, namely, that the more the set of relevant pre-emptors is skewed then the more easily it is retrieved from memory. This suggests that it is not just the frequency of pre-emptive forms that must be taken into account when trying to explain usage patterns but their skew as well.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Childhood, Learning and Development, Open University Milton Keynes, UK.
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ibbotson
keywords: diachronic use; generalizations; pre-emption; skew; verbal semantics