title: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A prospective comparative study of three surgical management procedures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The optimal surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation is controversial.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare prospectively the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by three different methods; discectomy alone, discectomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and diecectomy with posterolateral fusion (PLF), regardless of the postoperative radiological findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  This is a prospective, randomized, comparative study.
  
  
  METHODS
  This is a prospective, randomized, comparative study on 45 patients with first time recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Patients were evaluated clinically by using the criteria of the Japanese Orthopedic Association's evaluation system for low back pain syndrome (JOA score). The patients were classified into three groups: Group A; patients who had revision discectomy alone, group B; patients who had revision discectomy with TLIF, and group C; patients who had revision discectomy with PLF. The mean follow-up period was 37 (±7.85 STD) months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean overall recovery rate was 87.2% (±19.26 STD) and the satisfactory rate was 88.9%. Comparison between the three groups showed no significant difference with regard to the mean total postoperative JOA score, recovery rate, and satisfactory rate. However, the postoperative low back pain was significantly higher in group A than that of group B and C. Two patients in group A required further revision surgery. The incidences of dural tear and postoperative neurological deficit were higher in group A. The intraoperative blood loss and length of operation were significantly less in group A. The total cost of the procedure was significantly different between the three groups, being least in group A and highest in group B. There was no significant difference between the three groups with regard to the length of postoperative hospital stay.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Revision discectomy is effective in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Fusion with revision discectomy improves the postoperative low back pain, decreases the intraoperative risk of dural tear or neural damage and decreases the postoperative incidence of mechanical instability or re-recurrence. TLIF and PLF have comparable results when used with revision discectomy, but PLF has significantly less total cost than TLIF.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
authors.forename: Ayman A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: El Shazly
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
authors.forename: Mohammed A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: El Wardany
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
authors.forename: Ahmad M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Morsi
keywords: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; posterolateral fusion; recurrent lumbar disc herniation; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion