title: Tinnitus in men, mice (as well as other rodents), and machines.
abstract: The phantom auditory sensation of tinnitus is now studied in humans, animals, and computer models, and our understanding of how tinnitus is triggered and which neural mechanisms give rise to the phantom sensation in the brain has increased considerably. In most cases, tinnitus is associated with hearing loss, and even tinnitus patients with normal hearing thresholds might have cochlear damage that is not detected through conventional audiometry, as has been recently shown through auditory brainstem response measurements. Animals show behavioural signs of tinnitus after induction of hearing loss, indicating a causal relation. Moreover, surgical reduction of hearing loss in otosclerosis can reduce or even abolish tinnitus. However, hearing loss does not always lead to tinnitus. Psychophysical measurements have indicated that certain types of cochlear damage might be more closely linked to tinnitus than others. Recent animal studies have used behavioural testing to distinguish between animals with and without tinnitus after noise exposure. Comparisons between these groups of animals have helped identify neural correlates of tinnitus as well as factors that could represent a predisposition for tinnitus. Human neuroimaging studies have also begun to separate the neural signature of tinnitus from other consequences of hearing loss. The functional mechanisms that could underlie tinnitus development tinnitus have been analysed in computational modelling studies, which indicate that tinnitus could be a side-effect of the brain's attempt to compensate for hearing loss. Even though causal treatments for tinnitus are currently not available, hearing aids can provide considerable benefit when used in conjunction with counselling, tinnitus retraining therapy or cognitive behavioural therapy. Finally, animal studies demonstrate that the development of chronic noise-induced tinnitus might be prevented through timely interventions after noise exposure. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Annual Reviews 2014>.
authors.affiliation: UCL Ear Institute, 332 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE, UK. Electronic address: r.schaette@ucl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schaette
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003198:Computer Simulation; D012048:Correction of Hearing Impairment / Q000295:instrumentation; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D006310:Hearing Aids; D034381:Hearing Loss / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D008959:Models, Neurological; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D013045:Species Specificity; D014012:Tinnitus / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation