title: Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Computerized tomography DICOM file can be relatively easily transformed to a virtual 3D model. With the help of additional software we are able to create the mirrored model of an undamaged orbit and on this basis produce an individual implant for the patient Authors decided to apply implants with any thickness, which are authors own invention to obtain volumetric support and more stable orbital wall reconstruction outcome. Material of choice was ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to present and compare functional results of individual reconstructions of orbital wall using either titanium mesh or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.
  
  
  METHODS
  57 consecutive patients affected by orbital wall fracture (46 males, 11 females, mean age 34±14 year) were treated in Department of Maxillofacial Surgery from 2010 to 2012. In the first group we used patient specific treatment by titanium mesh shaped on a 3D printed model of a mirrored intact orbit (37 orbits) or by individually manufactured UHMW-PE implantby CAM milling in second group (20 orbits). All of these patients were subjected to preoperative helical computerized tomography and consultation of an ophthalmologist (including binocular single vision loss test - BSVL). Further on, patients were operated under general anaesthesia using transconjuctival approach. BSVL was again evaluated post-operationally in 1 month and 6 months later.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Functional treatment results (BSVL) for both groups were similar in 1 month as well as 6 months post operational time. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study of 6 months functional result assessment of pre-bent individual implants and CNC milled ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene of the orbital wall has shown it to be a predictable reconstruction method. Individually shaped UHMWPE seems to be as good as pre-bent titanium mesh.
authors.forename: Marcin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kozakiewicz
authors.forename: Piotr
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Szymor
mesh_terms: D000063:Accidents, Traffic; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009915:Orbit / Q000601:surgery*; D009917:Orbital Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D020273:Orbital Implants; D011095:Polyethylenes; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D014025:Titanium; D014754:Violence; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D011095:Polyethylenes; C111601:ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene; D014025:Titanium