title: Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
abstract: Two experiments aimed to determine why adults with dyslexia have higher global motion thresholds than typically reading controls. In Experiment 1, the dot density and number of animation frames presented in the dot stimulus were manipulated because of findings that use of a high dot density can normalize coherence thresholds in individuals with dyslexia. Dot densities were 14.15 and 3.54 dots/deg(2). These were presented for five (84 ms) or eight (134 ms) frames. The dyslexia group had higher coherence thresholds in all conditions than controls. However, in the high dot density, long duration condition, both reader groups had the lowest thresholds indicating normal temporal recruitment. These results indicated that the dyslexia group could sample the additional signals dots over space and then integrate these with the same efficiency as controls. In Experiment 2, we determined whether briefly presenting a fully coherent prime moving in either the same or opposite direction of motion to a partially coherent test stimulus would systematically increase and decrease global motion thresholds in the reader groups. When the direction of motion in the prime and test was the same, global motion thresholds increased for both reader groups. The increase in coherence thresholds was significantly greater for the dyslexia group. When the motion of the prime and test were presented in opposite directions, coherence thresholds were reduced in both groups. No group threshold differences were found. We concluded that the global motion processing deficit found in adults with dyslexia can be explained by undersampling of the target motion signals. This might occur because of difficulties directing attention to the relevant motion signals in the random dot pattern, and not a specific difficulty integrating global motion signals. These effects are most likely to occur in the group with dyslexia when more complex computational processes are required to process global motion.
authors.affiliation: Griffith Health Institute, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Elizabeth G
authors.initials: EG
authors.lastname: Conlon
authors.affiliation: Griffith Health Institute, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Gry
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lilleskaret
authors.affiliation: Griffith Health Institute, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Craig M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.affiliation: Griffith Health Institute, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Stuksrud
keywords: attention; coherent motion; dyslexia; perceptual contrast effect; temporal recruitment