title: Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank Reduces Test Burden With Less Ceiling Effects Compared With the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Patient-reported outcomes are important to assess effectiveness of clinical interventions. For orthopaedic trauma patients, the short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (sMFA) is a commonly used questionnaire. Recently, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PF Function Computer Adaptive Test (PF CAT) was developed using item response theory to efficiently administer questions from a calibrated bank of 124 PF questions using computerized adaptive testing. In this study, we compared the sMFA versus the PROMIS PF CAT for trauma patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Orthopaedic trauma patients completed the sMFA and the PROMIS PF CAT on a tablet wirelessly connected to the PROMIS Assessment Center. The time for each test administration was recorded. A 1-parameter item response theory model was used to examine the psychometric properties of the instruments, including precision and floor/ceiling effects.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred fifty-three orthopaedic trauma patients participated in the study. Mean test administration time for PROMIS PF CAT was 44 seconds versus 599 seconds for sMFA (P < 0.05). Both instruments showed extremely high item reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.98). In terms of instrument coverage, neither instrument showed any floor effect; however, the sMFA revealed 14.4% ceiling effect, whereas the PROMIS PF CAT had no appreciable ceiling effect.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Administered by electronic means, the PROMIS PF CAT required less than one-tenth the amount of time for patients to complete than the sMFA while achieving equally high reliability and less ceiling effects. The PROMIS PF CAT is a very attractive and innovative method for assessing patient-reported outcomes with minimal burden to patients.
authors.affiliation: Departmant of Orthopaedic Surgery Operations, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
authors.forename: Man
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hung
authors.forename: Ami R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Stuart
authors.forename: Thomas F
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Higgins
authors.forename: Charles L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Saltzman
authors.forename: Erik N
authors.initials: EN
authors.lastname: Kubiak
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008491:Medical Informatics Applications; D008875:Middle Aged; D009141:Musculoskeletal System / Q000293:injuries*; D063868:Patient Outcome Assessment; D011594:Psychometrics; D020127:Recovery of Function; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000628:therapy*; D055815:Young Adult