title: What type of person are you? Old-fashioned thinking even in modern science.
abstract: People around the world have folk origin myths, stories that explain where they came from and account for their place in the world and their differences from other peoples. As scientists, however, we claim to be seeking literal historical truth. In Western culture, typological ideas about human variation are at least as ancient as written discussion of the subject, and have dominated both social and scientific thinking about race. From Herodotus to the Biblical lost tribes of Israel, and surprisingly even to today, it has been common to view our species as composed of distinct, or even discrete groups, types, or "races," with other individuals admixed from among those groups. Such rhetoric goes so much against the well-known evolutionary realities that it must reflect something deep about human thought, at least in Western culture. Typological approaches can be convenient for some pragmatic aspects of scientific analysis, but they can be seductively deceiving. We know how to think differently and should do so, given the historical abuses that have occurred as a result of typological thinking that seem always to lurk in the human heart.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.
authors.forename: Kenneth M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Weiss
authors.forename: Brian W
authors.initials: BW
authors.lastname: Lambert
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D010551:Personality; D012586:Science; D013850:Thinking