title: The debate over robotics in benign gynecology.
abstract: The debate over the role of the da Vinci surgical robotic platform in benign gynecology is raging with increasing fervor and, as product liability issues arise, greater financial stakes. Although the best currently available science suggests that, in the hands of experts, robotics offers little in surgical advantage over laparoscopy, at increased expense, the observed decrease in laparotomy for hysterectomy is almost certainly, at least in part, attributable to the availability of the robot. In this author's opinion, the issue is not whether the robot has any role but rather to define the role in an institutional environment that also supports the safe use of vaginal and laparoscopic approaches in an integrated minimally invasive surgery program. Programs engaging robotic surgery should have a clear and self-determined regulatory process and should resist pressures in place that may preferentially support robotics over other forms of minimally invasive surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903. Electronic address: Charles_Rardin@Brown.edu.
authors.forename: Charles R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Rardin
mesh_terms: D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D012371:Robotics
keywords: minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery