title: Health belief model based evaluation of school health education programme for injury prevention among high school students in the community context.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although multifaceted community-based programmes have been widely developed, there remains a paucity of evaluation of the effectiveness of multifaceted injury prevention programmes implemented in different settings in the community context. This study was to provide information for the evaluation of community-based health education programmes of injury prevention among high school students.
  
  
  METHODS
  The pre-intervention survey was conducted in November 2009. Health belief model (HBM) based health education for injury prevention started in January 2010 and stopped in the end of 2011 among high school students in the community context in Shanghai, China. A post-intervention survey was conducted six weeks after the completion of intervention. Injury-related health belief indicators were captured by a short questionnaire before and after the intervention. Health belief scores were calculated and compared using the simple sum score (SSS) method and the confirmatory factor analysis weighted score (CFAWS) method, respectively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The average reliability coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.89. The factor structure of HBM was given and the data fit HBM in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) very well. The result of CFA showed that Perceived Benefits of Taking Action (BEN) and Perceived Seriousness (SER) had the greatest impact on the health belief, Perceived Susceptibility (SUS) and Cues to Action (CTA) were the second and third most important components of HBM respectively. Barriers to Taking Action (BAR) had no notable impact on HBM. The standardized path coefficient was only 0.35, with only a small impact on CTA. The health belief score was significantly higher after intervention (p < 0.001), which was similar in the CFAWS method and in the SSS method. However, the 95% confidential interval in the CFAWS method was narrower than that in the SSS method.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of CFA provide further empirical support for the HBM in injury intervention. The CFAWS method can be used to calculate the health belief scores and evaluate the injury related intervention. The community-based school health education might improve injury-related health belief among high school students; however, this preliminary observation needs to be confirmed in further research.
authors.forename: Zhi-Juan
authors.initials: ZJ
authors.lastname: Cao
authors.forename: Yue
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, "Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education", Fudan University, 130 Dong' an Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China. smwang@fudan.edu.cn.
authors.forename: Shu-Mei
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002681:China; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education / Q000592:standards*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D015397:Program Evaluation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012449:Safety; D012572:School Health Services; D012574:Schools; D013334:Students; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires / Q000592:standards*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000517:prevention & control*; D055815:Young Adult