title: Single port versus multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a comparative study.
abstract: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) was introduced to minimize postoperative morbidity and improve cosmesis. We performed a comparative study to assess feasibility, safety and perceived benefits of SPLC. Two groups of patients (104 each) with comparable demographic characteristics were selected for SPLC and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) between May 2010 to March 2011. SPLC was performed using X cone® with 5 mm extra long telescope and 3 ports for hand instruments. MPLC was performed with traditional 4 port technique. A large window was always created during dissection to obtain the critical view of safety. Data collection was prospective. The primary end points were post-operative pain and surgical complications. Secondary end points were patient assessed cosmesis and satisfaction scores and operating time. The mean VAS scores for pain in SPLC group were higher on day 0 (SPLC 3.37 versus MPLC 2.72, p = 0.03) and equivalent to MPLC group on day 1(SPLC 1.90 versus MPLC 1.79, p = 0.06). Number of patients requiring analgesia for breakthrough pain (SPLC 21.1 % versus MPLC 26.9 %, p = 0.31) was similar. Number and nature of surgical complications was similar (SPLC 17.3 % versus MPLC 21.2 %, p =0.59). Mean patient assessed cosmesis scores (SPLC 7.96 versus MPLC 7.16, p = 0.003) and mean patient satisfaction scores (SPLC 8.66 versus MPLC 8.16, p = 0.004) were higher in SPLC group indicating better cosmesis and greater patient satisfaction. SPLC took longer to perform (61 min versus 26 min, p = 0.00). Conversion was required in 5 patients in SPLC group. SPLC appears to be feasible and safe with cosmetic benefits in selected patients. However, challenges remain to improve operative ergonomics. SPLC needs to be proven efficacious with a high safety profile to be accepted as standard laparoscopic technique.
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sharma
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Soni
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Baijal
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Khullar
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Najma
authors.affiliation: Max Institute of Minimal Access, Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd., 1-2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi 110017 India.
authors.forename: P K
authors.initials: PK
authors.lastname: Chowbey
keywords: Learning curve; Patient assessed cosmesis; Patient satisfaction scores; Single incision laparoscopic surgery; Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy; X cone®