title: Causal explanation in the face of contradiction.
abstract: Previous work has shown that predictions can be mediated by mechanistic beliefs. The present study shows that such mediation only occurs in the face of contradictory, and not corroborative, evidence. In four experiments, we presented participants with causal statements describing a common-cause structure (E1 ← C → E2). Then we informed them of the states of C and E1 and asked them to judge the likelihood of E2. In Experiments 1 and 2, we manipulated whether the mechanisms supporting the two effects were the same or different, and whether the evidence presented confirmed or contradicted the participants' expectations. The relation between the mechanisms only influenced predictions when evidence contradicted the expectations, but not when it was consistent. In Experiments 3 and 4, we used a common-cause structure with identical mechanisms. We manipulated the order in which predictions were made. When confirmatory predictions were made before contradictory predictions, mechanistic modulation was not observed in the confirmatory case. In contrast, the modulation was found when confirmatory predictions were made after contradictory ones. The results support the contradiction hypothesis that causal structure is revised during prediction, but only in the face of unexpected evidence.
authors.affiliation: Interaction Science Institute, SungKyunkwan University, 3 ga, Myungryndong, Jongrogu, Seoul, South Korea, jhpark.skku@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Juhwa
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Steven A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Sloman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D059031:Anticipation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult