title: Should assisted dying be legalised?
abstract: When an individual facing intractable pain is given an estimate of a few months to live, does hastening death become a viable and legitimate alternative for willing patients? Has the time come for physicians to do away with the traditional notion of healthcare as maintaining or improving physical and mental health, and instead accept their own limitations by facilitating death when requested? The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge held the 2013 Varsity Medical Debate on the motion "This House Would Legalise Assisted Dying". This article summarises the key arguments developed over the course of the debate. We will explore how assisted dying can affect both the patient and doctor; the nature of consent and limits of autonomy; the effects on society; the viability of a proposed model; and, perhaps most importantly, the potential need for the practice within our current medico-legal framework.
authors.forename: Thomas D G
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Frost
authors.forename: Devan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sinha
authors.affiliation: Green Templeton College, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HG, UK. Barnabas.gilbert@gtc.ox.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Barnabas J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Gilbert
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D028701:Patient Rights; D010819:Physician's Role; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006113:United Kingdom