title: Can we talk? Fostering interchange between scientists and practitioners.
abstract: In response to three surveys of (mostly) cognitive-behavioral practitioners about barriers to treatment success with cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and social phobia (McAleavey, Castonguay, & Goldfried, 2014-this issue; Szkodny, Newman, & Goldfried, 2014-this issue; Wolf & Goldfried, 2014-this issue), the author proposes several methods for tapping clinical expertise in the development and dissemination of psychological interventions. These include: following surveys with interviews of a subset of clinicians to obtain richer information, systematically incorporating answers to questions and problems trainees raise in supervision in efficacy or effectiveness trials, organizing clinical roundtables at meetings of the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies to discuss ways to address barriers identified in these surveys, and encouraging papers on these topics in Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. At the same time the author emphasizes that clinical observations are not facts and need to be verified in empirical research.
authors.affiliation: University of Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Chambless@psych.upenn.edu.
authors.forename: Dianne L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Chambless
mesh_terms: D001008:Anxiety Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination; D012106:Research; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: anxiety disorders; cognitive-behavioral therapy; dissemination; training; treatment manual