title: Growth of mycorrhizal jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings planted in oil sands reclaimed areas.
abstract: The effectiveness of ectomycorrhizal inoculation at the tree nursery seedling production stage on growth and survival was examined in jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and white spruce (Picea glauca) planted in oil sands reclamation sites. The seedlings were inoculated with Hebeloma crustuliniforme strain # UAMH 5247, Suillus tomentosus strain # UAMH 6252, and Laccaria bicolor strain # UAMH 8232, as individual pure cultures and in combinations. These treatments were demonstrated to improve salinity resistance and water uptake in conifer seedlings. The field responses of seedlings to ectomycorrhizal inoculation varied between plant species, inoculation treatments, and measured parameters. Seedling inoculation resulted in higher ectomycorrhizal colonization rates compared with non-inoculated control, which had also a relatively small proportion of roots colonized by the nursery contaminant fungi identified as Amphinema byssoides and Thelephora americana. Seedling inoculation had overall a greater effect on relative height growth rates, dry biomass, and stem volumes in jack pine compared with white spruce. However, when examined after two growing seasons, inoculated white spruce seedlings showed up to 75% higher survival rates than non-inoculated controls. The persistence of inoculated fungi in roots of planted seedlings was examined at the end of the second growing season. Although the inoculation with H. crustuliniforme triggered growth responses, the fungus was not found in the roots of seedlings at the end of the second growing season suggesting a possibility that the observed growth-promoting effect of H. crustuliniforme may be transient. The results suggest that the inoculation of conifer seedlings with ectomycorrhizal fungi could potentially be carried out on a large scale in tree nurseries to benefit postplanting performance in oil sands reclamation sites. However, these practices should take into consideration the differences in responses between the different plant species and fungal strains.
authors.affiliation: Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
authors.forename: Nnenna E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: Onwuchekwa
authors.forename: Janusz J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Zwiazek
authors.forename: Ali
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Quoreshi
authors.forename: Damase P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Khasa
mesh_terms: D001487:Basidiomycota / Q000254:growth & development*; D018533:Biomass; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000254:growth & development*; D009821:Oils; D028222:Picea / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology; D028223:Pinus / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology; D063245:Plant Development; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000382:microbiology; D036226:Seedlings / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology; D012987:Soil; D012989:Soil Pollutants; D016019:Survival Analysis
chemical_list: D009821:Oils; D012987:Soil; D012989:Soil Pollutants