The good and bad of being fair: effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources.
The justice literature has paid considerable attention to the beneficial effects of fair behaviors for recipients of such behaviors. It is possible, however, that exhibiting fair behaviors may come at a cost for actors. In this article, we integrate ego depletion theory with organizational justice research in order to examine the consequences of justice behaviors for actors. We used an experience-sampling method in a sample of managerial employees to examine the relations of performing procedural justice and interpersonal justice behaviors with subsequent changes in actors' regulatory resources. Our results indicate that procedural justice behaviors are draining, whereas interpersonal justice behaviors are replenishing for actors. Depletion, in turn, adversely affected the performance of citizenship behavior, and depletion mediated relations of justice behavior with citizenship. Furthermore, 2 traits that impact self-regulatory skills--extraversion and neuroticism--moderated the replenishing effects of engaging in interpersonal justice behaviors. We conclude by discussing implications and avenues for future research.
Department of Management, Michigan State University.
Russell E
RE
Johnson
Department of Management, University of Florida.
Klodiana
K
Lanaj
Department of Management and Organization, University of Washington.
Christopher M
CM
Barnes
D000328:Adult; D001008:Anxiety Disorders / Q000523:psychology; D005120:Extraversion, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008297:Male; D000075384:Neuroticism; D015279:Organizational Culture; D012919:Social Behavior; D012935:Social Justice / Q000523:psychology*