Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care--systematic decision aid development and study protocol.
BACKGROUND
Care of patients with diabetes often occurs in the context of other chronic illness. Competing disease priorities and competing patient-physician priorities present challenges in the provision of care for the complex patient. Guideline implementation interventions to date do not acknowledge these intricacies of clinical practice. As a result, patients and providers are left overwhelmed and paralyzed by the sheer volume of recommendations and tasks. An individualized approach to the patient with diabetes and multiple comorbid conditions using shared decision-making (SDM) and goal setting has been advocated as a patient-centred approach that may facilitate prioritization of treatment options. Furthermore, incorporating interprofessional integration into practice may overcome barriers to implementation. However, these strategies have not been taken up extensively in clinical practice.


OBJECTIVE
To systematically develop and test an interprofessional SDM and goal-setting toolkit for patients with diabetes and other chronic diseases, following the Knowledge to Action framework.


METHODS
1. Feasibility study: Individual interviews with primary care physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and patients with diabetes will be conducted, exploring their experiences with shared decision-making and priority-setting, including facilitators and barriers, the relevance of a decision aid and toolkit for priority-setting, and how best to integrate it into practice.2. Toolkit development: Based on this data, an evidence-based multi-component SDM toolkit will be developed. The toolkit will be reviewed by content experts (primary care, endocrinology, geriatricians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, patients) for accuracy and comprehensiveness.3. Heuristic evaluation: A human factors engineer will review the toolkit and identify, list and categorize usability issues by severity.4. Usability testing: This will be done using cognitive task analysis.5. Iterative refinement: Throughout the development process, the toolkit will be refined through several iterative cycles of feedback and redesign.


CONCLUSIONS
Interprofessional shared decision-making regarding priority-setting with the use of a decision aid toolkit may help prioritize care of individuals with multiple comorbid conditions. Adhering to principles of user-centered design, we will develop and refine a toolkit to assess the feasibility of this approach.
Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St, Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. yuca@smh.ca.
Catherine H
CH
Yu
Dawn
D
Stacey
Joanna
J
Sale
Susan
S
Hall
David M
DM
Kaplan
Noah
N
Ivers
Jeremy
J
Rezmovitz
Fok-Han
FH
Leung
Baiju R
BR
Shah
Sharon E
SE
Straus
D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000628:therapy*; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration; D005260:Female; D006040:Goals; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000379:methods*; D012107:Research Design; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors