A relational approach to health practices: towards transcending the agency-structure divide.
Many health scholars find that Pierre Bourdieu's theory of practice leaves too little room for individual agency. We contend that, by virtue of its relational, field-theoretic underpinnings, the idea of leaving room for agency in Bourdieu's theory of practice is misguided. With agency manifested in interactions and social structures consisting of relations built upon relations, the stark distinction between agency and structure inherent to substantialist thinking is undermined, even dissolved, in a relational field-theoretic context. We also contend that, when treated as relationally bound phenomena, Bourdieu's notions of habitus, doxa, capital and field illuminate creative, adaptive and future-looking practices. We conclude by discussing difficulties inherent to implementing a relational theory of practice in health promotion and public health.
Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia.
Gerry
G
Veenstra
Patrick John
PJ
Burnett
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011634:Public Health / Q000379:methods; D015980:Public Health Practice
Bourdieu; field; health behaviour; health practices; relationality; structure-agency