Quantifying habitat impacts of natural gas infrastructure to facilitate biodiversity offsetting.
Habitat degradation through anthropogenic development is a key driver of biodiversity loss. One way to compensate losses is "biodiversity offsetting" (wherein biodiversity impacted is "replaced" through restoration elsewhere). A challenge in implementing offsets, which has received scant attention in the literature, is the accurate determination of residual biodiversity losses. We explore this challenge for offsetting gas extraction in the Ustyurt Plateau, Uzbekistan. Our goal was to determine the landscape extent of habitat impacts, particularly how the footprint of "linear" infrastructure (i.e. roads, pipelines), often disregarded in compensation calculations, compares with "hub" infrastructure (i.e. extraction facilities). We measured vegetation cover and plant species richness using the line-intercept method, along transects running from infrastructure/control sites outward for 500 m, accounting for wind direction to identify dust deposition impacts. Findings from 24 transects were extrapolated to the broader plateau by mapping total landscape infrastructure network using GPS data and satellite imagery. Vegetation cover and species richness were significantly lower at development sites than controls. These differences disappeared within 25 m of the edge of the area physically occupied by infrastructure. The current habitat footprint of gas infrastructure is 220 ± 19 km(2) across the Ustyurt (total ∼ 100,000 km(2)), 37 ± 6% of which is linear infrastructure. Vegetation impacts diminish rapidly with increasing distance from infrastructure, and localized dust deposition does not conspicuously extend the disturbance footprint. Habitat losses from gas extraction infrastructure cover 0.2% of the study area, but this reflects directly eliminated vegetation only. Impacts upon fauna pose a more difficult determination, as these require accounting for behavioral and demographic responses to disturbance by elusive mammals, including threatened species. This study demonstrates that impacts of linear infrastructure in regions such as the Ustyurt should be accounted for not just with respect to development sites but also associated transportation and delivery routes.
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Ascot, U. K.
Isabel L
IL
Jones
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Ascot, U. K.
Joseph W
JW
Bull
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Ascot, U. K.
Eleanor J
EJ
Milner-Gulland
Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Alexander V
AV
Esipov
Department of Life Sciences & Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus Ascot, U. K.
Kenwyn B
KB
Suttle
Compensation; Uzbekistan; ecological impact assessment; residual impact; semi-arid