Comparing the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the antibacterial activity of gaseous ozone and chlorhexidine solution on a tooth cavity model.


METHODS
Twenty-one human molars were divided into 3 groups. Cavities were then cut into the teeth (4 per tooth, 28 cavities per group). After sterilization, the teeth were left in broth cultures of 106 colony-forming units (CFU) ml-1 of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) at 36°C for 48 h. The appropriate treatment followed (group A, control; group B, 2% chlorhexidine solution; and group C, 80s of treatment with ozone, and the cavities were then filled with composite resin. After 72h, the restorations were removed, dentin chips were collected with an excavator, and the total number of microorganisms was determined.


RESULTS
Both of the treatments significantly reduced the number of S. mutans present compared with the control group and there was a significant difference between the all groups in terms of the amount of the microorganisms grown (p < 0.05). Group B was beter than group C; and group C was better than group A. Moreover, it was found that the amount of the growth in the group of chlorhexidine was significantly less than that of the ozone group (p < 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
Chlorhexidine solution was the antibacterial treatment most efficacious on S. mutans; however, ozone application could be an anlternative cavity disinfection method because of ozone's cavity disinfection activity. Key words:Antibacterial activity, chlorhexidine, ozone, streptococcus mutans, tooth cavity.
DDS, PhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Arife
A
Kapdan
DDS, PhD. Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nurhan
N
Oztaş
DDS, PhD. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Zeynep
Z
Sümer