Disagreement between human papillomavirus assays: an unexpected challenge for the choice of an assay in primary cervical screening.
We aimed to determine the disagreement in primary cervical screening between four human papillomavirus assays: Hybrid Capture 2, cobas, CLART, and APTIMA. Material from 5,064 SurePath samples of women participating in routine cervical screening in Copenhagen, Denmark, was tested with the four assays. Positive agreement between the assays was measured as the conditional probability that the results of all compared assays were positive given that at least one assay returned a positive result. Of all 5,064 samples, 1,679 (33.2%) tested positive on at least one of the assays. Among these, 41% tested positive on all four. Agreement was lower in women aged ≥ 30 years (30%, vs. 49% at <30 years), in primary screening samples (29%, vs. 38% in follow-up samples), and in women with concurrent normal cytology (22%, vs. 68% with abnormal cytology). Among primary screening samples from women aged 30-65 years (n = 2,881), 23% tested positive on at least one assay, and 42 to 58% of these showed positive agreement on any compared pair of the assays. While 4% of primary screening samples showed abnormal cytology, 6 to 10% were discordant on any pair of assays. A literature review corroborated our findings of considerable disagreement between human papillomavirus assays. This suggested that the extent of disagreement in primary screening is neither population- nor storage media-specific, leaving assay design differences as the most probable cause. The substantially different selection of women testing positive on the various human papillomavirus assays represents an unexpected challenge for the choice of an assay in primary cervical screening, and for follow up of in particular HPV positive/cytology normal women.
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matejka
M
Rebolj
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark ; Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Sarah
S
Preisler
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark ; Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ditte Møller
DM
Ejegod
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Carsten
C
Rygaard
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elsebeth
E
Lynge
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark ; Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jesper
J
Bonde
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001681:Biological Assay / Q000379:methods*; D003718:Denmark; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D027383:Papillomaviridae / Q000737:chemistry*; D030361:Papillomavirus Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D055815:Young Adult