Claiming Darwin: Stephen Jay Gould in contests over evolutionary orthodoxy and public perception, 1977-2002.
This article analyzes the impact of the resurgence of American creationism in the early 1980s on debates within post-synthesis evolutionary biology. During this period, many evolutionists criticized Harvard biologist Stephen Jay Gould for publicizing his revisions to traditional Darwinian theory and opening evolution to criticism by creationists. Gould's theory of punctuated equilibrium was a significant source of contention in these disputes. Both he and his critics, including Richard Dawkins, claimed to be carrying the mantle of Darwinian evolution. By the end of the 1990s, the debate over which evolutionary thinkers were the rightful heirs to Darwin's evolutionary theory was also a conversation over whether Darwinism could be defended against creationists in the broader cultural context. Gould and others' claims to Darwin shaped the contours of a political, religious and scientific controversy.
Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Science Center 371, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States. Electronic address: myrna.sheldon@gmail.com.
Myrna Perez
MP
Sheldon
D005075:Biological Evolution; D003469:Culture; D034462:Dissent and Disputes / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D010465:Perception; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D011639:Public Opinion / Q000266:history*; D012072:Religious Philosophies / Q000266:history*; D012586:Science / Q000266:history*; D014481:United States
Creationism; Darwinism; Pseudoscience; Punctuated equilibrium; Scientific orthodoxy; Stephen Jay Gould