The evidence for the use of nutritional support in liver disease.
OBJECTIVE
Although there is a well established association between malnutrition and poorer clinical outcomes in patients with liver disease, that fact alone does not prove that improving the malnutrition will improve outcome. The best way to determine if nutritional interventions are effective is to compare them to untreated control groups in well designed and executed randomized clinical trials.


RESULTS
A recent systematic review assessed 37 trials that compared parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, or nutritional supplements to no nutritional therapy in patients with a variety of liver diseases. Since the publication of that review, an additional three trials have become available. Whereas all but one of the trials did have methodologic shortcomings that may have allowed the introduction of bias (which usually results in an overestimation of benefit), the trials failed to show much, if any, benefit. In fact, the single trial at low risk of bias found that more deaths occurred in the recipients of the supplements.


CONCLUSIONS
Although malnutrition may be associated with a poor outcome, the current best evidence indicates that the provision of adjunctive nutritional support (parenteral or enteral nutrition, or nutritional supplements) to patients with a variety of liver diseases (alcoholic hepatitis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver surgery, liver transplantation, obstructive jaundice, hepatitis C antiviral treatment) does not improve clinical outcomes.
aDavid Geffen-UCLA School of Medicine bOlive View-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles and Sylmar, California, USA.
Ronald L
RL
Koretz
D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004750:Enteral Nutrition / Q000379:methods; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D018529:Nutritional Support / Q000379:methods*; D010288:Parenteral Nutrition / Q000379:methods