Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using a direct (open tray) impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the 3-dimensional spatial orientation of implants intraorally to the cast. Consequently, the prosthesis may require corrective procedures. This in vitro study evaluated the accuracy of 3 different impression techniques using polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression material to obtain a precise cast for multiple internal connection implants. A reference acrylic resin model with 4 internal connection implants was fabricated. Impressions of the reference model were made using 3 different techniques and 2 different impression materials. The study consisted of 24 specimens divided into 6 groups of 4 each. Impressions were poured with ADA type IV stone (Kalrock, Kalabhai Karson Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India). All casts were evaluated for the positional accuracy (mm) of the implant replica heads using a profile projector. These measurements were compared to the measurements calculated on the reference resin model, which served as a control. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison procedures to evaluate group means. The results revealed significant difference for anterior implant distance between the 2 impression materials (P < .01) and also among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). The lowest mean variation was found with the polyether impression material and the splinted technique. For posterior implants, the results suggested no significant difference between the 2 impression materials (P ≥ .05). Although results were not statistically significant, the polyether impression material showed the lowest mean variation as compared to the VPS impression material. However, there was a significant difference among the 3 different techniques (P < .05). Among the 3 different techniques, the lowest mean variation between 2 posterior implants was found in the splinted technique. Casts obtained from impression techniques using square impression copings splinted together with autopolymerizing acrylic resin prior to the impression procedure were more accurate than casts obtained from impressions with nonmodified implant impression copings and with airborne particle-abraded, adhesive-coated copings. Casts obtained from polyether impression material were more accurate than casts obtained from vinyl polysiloxane impression material.
1 Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Dental College and Hospital, Solapur, India.
Malesh
M
Pujari
Pooja
P
Garg
D R
DR
Prithviraj
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D000269:Adhesives / Q000737:chemistry; D002133:Calcium Sulfate / Q000737:chemistry; D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible / Q000737:chemistry; D003734:Dental Casting Investment / Q000737:chemistry; D003735:Dental Casting Technique / Q000592:standards*; D045662:Dental Etching / Q000379:methods; D015921:Dental Implants; D003760:Dental Impression Materials / Q000592:standards*; D003761:Dental Impression Technique / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D011145:Polyvinyls / Q000592:standards; D012117:Resins, Synthetic / Q000592:standards; D012833:Siloxanes / Q000592:standards; D013165:Splints; D013499:Surface Properties
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000269:Adhesives; D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible; D003734:Dental Casting Investment; D015921:Dental Implants; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; C022821:Impregum; D011145:Polyvinyls; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D012833:Siloxanes; C034183:vinyl polysiloxane; D002133:Calcium Sulfate