Force control in manipulation tasks: comparison of two common methods of grip force calculation.
We compared two standard methods routinely used to assess the grip force (GF; perpendicular force that hand exerts upon the hand-held object) in the studies of coordination of GF and load force (LF; tangential force) in manipulation tasks. A variety of static tasks were tested, and GF-LF coupling (i.e., the maximum cross-correlation between the forces) was assessed. GF was calculated either as the minimum value of the two opposing GF components acting upon the hand-held object (GFmin) or as their average value (GFavg). Although both methods revealed high GF-LF correlation coefficients, most of the data revealed the higher values for GFavg than for GFmin. Therefore, we conclude that the CNS is more likely to take into account GFavg than GFmin when controlling static manipulative actions as well as that GFavg should be the variable of choice in kinetic analyses of static manipulation tasks.
Dept. of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Mehmet
M
Uygur
Goran
G
Prebeg
Slobodan
S
Jaric
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D018953:Kinesiology, Applied / Q000295:instrumentation; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture; D014159:Transducers