Making working memory work: the effects of extended practice on focus capacity and the processes of updating, forward access, and random access.
We investigated the effects of 10h of practice on variations of the N-Back task to investigate the processes underlying possible expansion of the focus of attention within working memory. Using subtractive logic, we showed that random access (i.e., Sternberg-like search) yielded a modest effect (a 50% increase in speed) whereas the processes of forward access (i.e., retrieval in order, as in a standard N-Back task) and updating (i.e., changing the contents of working memory) were executed about 5 times faster after extended practice. We additionally found that extended practice increased working memory capacity as measured by the size of the focus of attention for the forward-access task, but not for variations where probing was in random order. This suggests that working memory capacity may depend on the type of search process engaged, and that certain working-memory-related cognitive processes are more amenable to practice than others.
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States. Electronic address: jprice3@gatech.edu.
John M
JM
Price
University of Maryland, United States.
Gregory J H
GJ
Colflesh
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, United States.
John
J
Cerella
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States.
Paul
P
Verhaeghen
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011214:Practice, Psychological
N-Back; Practice; Working memory