Substitution of fish oil with camelina oil and inclusion of camelina meal in diets fed to Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and their effects on growth, tissue lipid classes, and fatty acids.
Developing a commercially relevant Atlantic cod aquaculture industry will require improvements in feed sustainability. Camelina oil and meal are potential replacements of fish oil and fish meal in aquaculture feeds. Camelina oil is high in 18:3ω3 (30%), with an ω3/ω6 ratio > 1. Camelina meal has a considerable crude protein level (38%), which includes significant amounts of methionine and phenylalanine. Four diets were tested; each diet was fed to triplicate tanks (3 tanks per diet) of Atlantic cod (14.4 g/fish; 70 fish per tank) for 13 wk. The diets included a fish oil/fish meal control (FO) and three diets which replaced 100% of fish oil with camelina oil: one diet contained fish meal (100CO), another solvent extracted fish meal (100COSEFM), and another had fish meal partially reduced by 15% inclusion of camelina meal (100CO15CM). Growth was measured (length and weight) and tissue samples were collected for lipid analysis (muscle, liver, brain, gut, spleen, skin, and carcass) at wk 0 (before feeding the experimental diet) and at wk 13. Cod fed camelina oil had a lower (P < 0.001) final weight than cod fed the FO diet (50.8 ± 10.3 g/fish). Cod fed 100CO15CM had a lower (P < 0.001) final weight (35.0 ± 8.0 g) than those fed 100CO (43.6 ± 8.9 g) and 100COSEFM (46.7 ± 10.7 g). Cod tissues in the 100COSEFM treatment were most impacted by dietary fatty acid profile. Multivariate statistics revealed that FO and 100COSEFM tissue fatty acid profiles were 21 to 31% different, depending on tissue type. The full replacement of fish oil with camelina oil, plus solvent extracted fish meal had an overarching effect on the entire fatty acid profile of the whole animal. Fatty acid mass balance calculations indicated that cod fed 100COSEFM elongated 13% of 18:3ω3 to 20:3ω3 and oxidized the remaining 87%, whereas cod fed fish oil showed a much lower (P < 0.001) elongation of 18:3ω3 of 1.6%. These results suggest that excess 18:3ω3 from camelina oil caused some fatty acid elongation, but little desaturation. Energy budget estimates indicated that cod fed 100COSEFM deposited the most energy throughout the trial (60 kJ/fish; P = 0.019), mostly in the liver (90%). Excess camelina lipids were not necessarily utilized for energy, which likely impacted growth. Feeding 100% camelina oil to Atlantic cod impacted growth and lipid and fatty acid composition; however, additional removal of fish oil from fish meal caused the greatest change in cod lipid composition and utilization.
Department of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Marine Lab Road, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1C 5S7, Canada.
S M
SM
Hixson
C C
CC
Parrish
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D017756:Aquaculture; D019607:Brassicaceae / Q000737:chemistry*; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary*; D005227:Fatty Acids / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D048389:Gadus morhua / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism; D008055:Lipids / Q000737:chemistry*; D010938:Plant Oils / Q000737:chemistry / Q000494:pharmacology*
D005227:Fatty Acids; D008055:Lipids; D010938:Plant Oils