Monitoring equine visceral pain with a composite pain scale score and correlation with survival after emergency gastrointestinal surgery.
Recognition and management of equine pain have been studied extensively in recent decades and this has led to significant advances. However, there is still room for improvement in the ability to identify and treat pain in horses that have undergone emergency gastrointestinal surgery. This study assessed the validity and clinical application of the composite pain scale (CPS) in horses after emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Composite pain scores were determined every 4h over 3 days following emergency gastrointestinal surgery in 48 horses. Inter-observer reliability was determined and another composite visceral pain score (numerical rating scale, NRS) was determined simultaneously with CPS scores. CPS scores had higher inter-observer reliability (r=0.87, K=0.84, P<0.001), compared to NRS scores (r=0.68, K=0.72, P<0.001). Horses that survived without complications had significantly lower CPS and NRS scores compared to horses that were euthanased or had to undergo re-laparotomy (P<0.001). Breed and the location in the intestinal tract (small or large intestine) did not influence pain scores. In conclusion, the use of the CPS improved objectivity of pain scoring in horses following emergency gastrointestinal surgery. High inter-observer reliability allows for comparisons between different observers. This will be of great benefit in larger veterinary hospitals where several attending clinicians are often involved in the care of each case.
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.p.a.m.vanloon@uu.nl.
Johannes P A M
JP
van Loon
Department of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 102, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Valerie S M
VS
Jonckheer-Sheehy
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Domestic Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Willem
W
Back
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P René
PR
van Weeren
Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 114, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands; Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, NL-3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ludo J
LJ
Hellebrekers
D004638:Emergency Treatment / Q000662:veterinary*; D041981:Gastrointestinal Tract / Q000601:surgery*; D015588:Observer Variation; D059408:Pain Management / Q000662:veterinary*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000662:veterinary*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D059265:Visceral Pain / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000662:veterinary*
Colic; Composite; Equine; Pain; Scale