Genomics education for the public: perspectives of genomic researchers and ELSI advisors.
OBJECTIVE
For more than two decades genomic education of the public has been a significant challenge. As genomic information becomes integrated into daily life and routine clinical care, the need for public education is even more critical. We conducted a pilot study to learn how genomic researchers and ethical, legal, and social implications advisors who were affiliated with large-scale genomic variation studies have approached the issue of educating the public about genomics.


RESULTS
Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with researchers and advisors associated with the SNP/HAPMAP studies and the Cancer Genome Atlas Study. Respondents described approach(es) associated with educating the public about their study. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed by team review. Although few respondents described formal educational efforts, most provided recommendations for what should/could be done, emphasizing the need for an overarching entity(s) to take responsibility to lead the effort to educate the public. Opposing views were described related to: who this should be; the overall goal of the educational effort; and the educational approach. Four thematic areas emerged: What is the rationale for educating the public about genomics?; Who is the audience?; Who should be responsible for this effort?; and What should the content be? Policy issues associated with these themes included the need to agree on philosophical framework(s) to guide the rationale, content, and target audiences for education programs; coordinate previous/ongoing educational efforts; and develop a centralized knowledge base. Suggestions for next steps are presented.


CONCLUSIONS
A complex interplay of philosophical, professional, and cultural issues can create impediments to genomic education of the public. Many challenges, however, can be addressed by agreement on a guiding philosophical framework(s) and identification of a responsible entity(s) to provide leadership for developing/overseeing an appropriate infrastructure to support the coordination/integration/sharing and evaluation of educational efforts, benefiting consumers and professionals.
1 Mission Health , Fullerton Genetics Center, Personalized Medicine, Asheville, North Carolina.
Lynn G
LG
Dressler
Sondra Smolek
SS
Jones
Janell M
JM
Markey
Katherine W
KW
Byerly
Megan C
MC
Roberts
D022126:Access to Information / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003253:Consultants / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D023281:Genomics / Q000193:education* / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires