title: Measuring verticality perception after stroke: why and how?
abstract: About 80 papers dealing with verticality after stroke have been published in the last 20years. Here we reviewed the reasons and findings that explain why measuring verticality perception after stroke is interesting. Research on verticality perception after stroke has contributed to improve the knowledge on brain mechanisms, which build up and update a sense of verticality. Preliminary research using modern techniques of brain imaging has shown that the posterior lateral thalamus and the parietal insular cortex are areas of interest for this internal model of verticality. How they interact and are critical remains to be investigated. From a clinical standpoint, it has now been clearly established that biases in verticality perception are frequent after a stroke, causing postural disorders. Measuring the postural vertical with the wheel paradigm has allowed elucidating the mechanisms of lateropulsion, leading or not to a pushing. Schematically, patients with a hemispheric stroke align their erect posture with an erroneous reference of verticality, tilted to the side opposite the lesion. In patients with a brainstem stroke lateropulsion is usually ipsilesional, and results rather from a pathological asymmetry of tone, through vestibulo-spinal mechanisms. These evolutions of concepts and measurement standards of verticality representation should guide the emergence of rehabilitation programs specifically dedicated to the sense of verticality after stroke. Indeed, several pilot studies using appropriate somatosensory stimulation suggest the possibility to recalibrate the internal model of verticality biased by the stroke, and to improve uprightness. Vestibular stimulations seem to be less relevant and efficient.
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France. Electronic address: dperennou@chu-grenoble.fr.
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Pérennou
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France.
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Piscicelli
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France.
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Barbieri
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Jaeger
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Marquer
authors: Clinique MPR-CHU, Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG CNRS 5525 Equipe Santé-Plasticité-Motricité, Université Grenoble 1, Hôpital Sud, CHU, avenue de Kimberley, BP 338, 38000 Grenoble, France; Université Paris Descartes, laboratoire de Psychologie et Neuropsychologie Cognitive, FRE 3292, 71, avenue Edouard-Vaillant, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Barra
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D004856:Postural Balance; D013028:Space Perception; D020521:Stroke / Q000523:psychology*; D014796:Visual Perception
keywords: Haptical vertical; Internal model; Lateropulsion; Latéropulsion; Modèle interne; Neuromodulation; Plasticity; Plasticité; Postural vertical; Pusher syndrome; Pushing behavior; Rehabilitation; Rééducation; Verticale haptique; Verticale posturale; Verticale visuelle; Visual vertical