title: Clinical implications of non-steatotic hepatic fat fractions on quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver.
abstract: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an important diagnostic tool in the assessment of focal liver lesions and diffuse liver diseases such as cirrhosis and fibrosis. Quantitative DWI parameters such as molecular diffusion, microperfusion and their fractions, are known to be affected when hepatic fat fractions (HFF) are higher than 5.5% (steatosis). However, less is known about the effect on DWI for HFF in the normal non-steatotic range below 5.5%, which can be found in a large part of the population. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the diagnostic implications of non-steatotic HFF on quantitative DWI parameters in eight liver segments. For this purpose, eleven healthy volunteers (2 men, mean-age 31.0) were prospectively examined with DWI and three series of in-/out-of-phase dual-echo spoiled gradient-recalled MRI sequences to obtain the HFF and T2*. DWI data were analyzed using the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Four circular regions (ø22.3 mm) were drawn in each of eight liver segments and averaged. Measurements were divided in group 1 (HFF ≤ 2.75%), group 2 (2.75< HFF ≤ 5.5%) and group 3 (HFF>5.5%). DWI parameters and T2* were compared between the three groups and between the segments. It was observed that the molecular diffusion (0.85, 0.72 and 0.49 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and T2* (32.2, 27.2 and 21.0 ms) differed significantly between the three groups of increasing HFF (2.18, 3.50 and 19.91%). Microperfusion and its fraction remained similar for different HFF. Correlations with HFF were observed for the molecular diffusion (r = -0.514, p<0.001) and T2* (-0.714, p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for the majority of individual liver segments. It was concluded that fat significantly decreases molecular diffusion in the liver, also in absence of steatosis (HFF ≤ 5.5%). Also, it was confirmed that fat influences T2*. Determination of HFF prior to quantitative DWI is therefore crucial.
authors: Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands ; Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Hildebrand
authors: H
authors: Dijkstra
authors: Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Astri
authors: A
authors: Handayani
authors: Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Kappert
authors: Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Matthijs
authors: M
authors: Oudkerk
authors: Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors: Paul E
authors: PE
authors: Sijens
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000473:pathology*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D038524:Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008099:Liver / Q000473:pathology*; D008103:Liver Cirrhosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult