title: Is anthelmintic resistance a concern for the control of human soil-transmitted helminths?
abstract: The major human soil-transmitted helminths (STH), Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) and Trichuris trichiura have a marked impact on human health in many parts of the world. Current efforts to control these parasites rely predominantly on periodic mass administration of anthelmintic drugs to school age children and other at-risk groups. After many years of use of these same drugs for controlling roundworms in livestock, high levels of resistance have developed, threatening the sustainability of these livestock industries in some locations. Hence, the question arises as to whether this is likely to also occur in the human STH, thereby threatening our ability to control these parasites. This is particularly important because of the recent increase in mass control programmes, relying almost exclusively on benzimidazole anthelmintics. It will be important to ensure that resistance is detected as it emerges in order to allow the implementation of mitigation strategies, such as use of drug combinations, to ensure that the effectiveness of the few existing anthelmintic drugs is preserved. In this review we address these issues by firstly examining the efficacy of anthelmintics against the human STH, and assessing whether there are any indications to date that resistance has emerged. We then consider the factors that influence the effect of current drug-use patterns in selecting for resistant parasite populations. We describe the tools currently available for resistance monitoring (field-based coprological methods), and those under development (in vitro bioassays and molecular tests), and highlight confounding factors that need to be taken into account when interpreting such resistance-monitoring data. We then highlight means to ensure that the currently available tools are used correctly, particularly with regard to study design, and we set appropriate drug-efficacy thresholds. Finally, we make recommendations for monitoring drug efficacy in the field, as components of control programmes, in order to maximise the ability to detect drug resistance, and if it arises to change control strategy and prevent the spread of resistance.
authors.affiliation: Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Laboratory of Parasitology, Merelbeke, Belgium.
authors.forename: Jozef
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Vercruysse
authors.affiliation: Ivo de Carneri Foundation, Milan, Italy.
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Albonico
authors.affiliation: School of Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Jerzy M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Behnke
authors.affiliation: Division of Livestock Industries, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Kotze
authors.affiliation: Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
authors.forename: Roger K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Prichard
authors.affiliation: Queensland Institute for Medical Research, University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.
authors.forename: James S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: McCarthy
authors.affiliation: Department of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Antonio
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Montresor
authors.affiliation: Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Laboratory of Parasitology, Merelbeke, Belgium.
authors.forename: Bruno
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Levecke
keywords: Anthelmintic resistance; Anthelmintics; Guidelines; Soil-transmitted helminths