title: How and where: theory-of-mind in the brain.
abstract: Theory of mind (ToM) is a core topic in both social neuroscience and developmental psychology, yet theory and data from each field have only minimally constrained thinking in the other. The two fields might be fruitfully integrated, however, if social neuroscientists sought evidence directly relevant to current accounts of ToM development: modularity, simulation, executive, and theory theory accounts. Here we extend the distinct predictions made by each theory to the neural level, describe neuroimaging evidence that in principle would be relevant to testing each account, and discuss such evidence where it exists. We propose that it would be mutually beneficial for both fields if ToM neuroimaging studies focused more on integrating developmental accounts of ToM acquisition with neuroimaging approaches, and suggest ways this might be achieved.
authors.affiliation: University of Oregon, USA; University of Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: cmahy@uoregon.edu.
authors.forename: Caitlin E V
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Mahy
authors.affiliation: University of Oregon, USA.
authors.forename: Louis J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Moses
authors.affiliation: University of Oregon, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Pfeifer
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000639:trends; D056345:Theory of Mind
keywords: Executive functioning; Modularity; Neuroimaging; Simulation; Theory of mind; Theory theory