title: Improving outcome of bariatric surgery: best practices in an accredited surgical center.
abstract: The number of laparoscopic bariatric procedures being performed in the USA has increased dramatically in the past decade. Because of limited health-care resources, hospital administrators and insurance carriers are placing emphasis on length of stay and patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a clinical pathway in managing patients undergoing bariatric surgery in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) accredited center. The setting was a university hospital in USA. A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively on patients undergoing bariatric surgery at St Luke's University was performed. Patients included underwent either a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Patients were subjected to a clinical protocol and discharged when discharge criteria were met. The primary outcomes were length of stay, 30 day readmission, complication, and reoperation rates. A cost analysis of the savings accrued was also performed. Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in our analysis (80.4% females and 19.6% males). Seventy-one patients (31%) underwent LSG, and 158 patients (69%) underwent LRYGB. The average length of stay was 32.45 h (range 24-72 h). The 30-day readmission rate was 3.0% (7/229 patients). The 30 day complication rate (including intervention, reintubation, and reoperation) was 2.6% (6/229). The 30 day mortality rate was 0. The average prospective cost savings were $2,016 and $1,209 per LRYGB and LSG patient, respectively. Our bariatric surgery clinical protocol is feasible and safe with substantial prospective cost savings at St Luke's University and Health Network. Patients subjected to our protocol have low readmission and complication rates. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the benefit of this innovative new protocol in bariatric surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Division of Bariatric and Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Medical School of Temple University/St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network, 1736 Hamilton Boulevard, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA, Maher.ElChaar@sluhn.org.
authors.forename: Maher
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: El Chaar
authors.forename: Leonardo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Claros
authors.forename: George C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Ezeji
authors.forename: Maureen
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Miletics
authors.forename: Jill
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Stoltzfus
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D050110:Bariatric Surgery / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D009767:Obesity, Morbid / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012086:Reoperation / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D015431:Weight Loss