title: [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].
abstract: Evidence-based patient information is an essential part of decision making in health issues. A qualitative study was conducted to examine whether consumers consider the health information on colorectal cancer screening in Germany helpful in supporting their decision making. In this study, eight texts from different German authors about colorectal cancer screening were evaluated with a criteria-based selection. The texts were tested for understandability, structure, design, and effect on readers. Thirteen semi-structured focus groups were formed including 59 higher-educated and 15 lower-educated testers, 46 % of them being male with a mean age of 62.9 years. The transcripts were analyzed by content-analytic assessment. The testers provided detailed comments on the content and design of the texts. They revealed inaccuracies and suggested improvements of the texts. The testers differed from each other in terms of the intensity of their participation in the discussions and comprehension of the material. The reception of the flyers and brochures varied according to the educational level of the testers. Lower-educated testers often skipped passages of texts about risks as well as passages containing numbers and graphics. The texts had different effects on the testers, regardless of the level of education. If adverse effects were presented, some testers became scared while others were reassured because they felt informed. Most of the testers appreciated a call for participation as a central message of the text. Sometimes, if there was no clear appeal to attend the screening, the testers even asked for it. The recently introduced political strategy of promoting an informed choice is applied to an unprepared population who was used to getting a clear yes-or-no recommendation. Thus, at first, the population has to learn how to make an informed choice. This topic must be addressed and taken into account in the process of developing health information. Since this is not always the case, we conclude that current materials are limited in their contribution toward the decision of attending CRC screening.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung, OE 5410, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland, Seidel.Gabriele@mh-hannover.de.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Seidel
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Münch
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dreier
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Borutta
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Walter
authors.forename: M-L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Dierks
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000517:prevention & control; D003256:Community Participation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D032882:Comprehension; D054626:Consumer Health Information / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer; D004522:Educational Status; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006266:Health Education / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057220:Health Literacy / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010174:Pamphlets
vernacular_title: Sind Informationsmaterialien zur Darmkrebsfrüherkennung in Deutschland verständlich oder verfehlen sie ihre Wirkung? : Bewertung von Gesundheitsinformationen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer mit unterschiedlichem Bildungshintergrund.