title: Assessing security technology's impact: old tools for new problems.
abstract: The general idea developed in this paper from a sociological perspective is that some of the foundational categories on which the debate about privacy, security and technology rests are blurring. This process is a consequence of a blurring of physical and digital worlds. In order to define limits for legitimate use of intrusive digital technologies, one has to refer to binary distinctions such as private versus public, human versus technical, security versus insecurity to draw differences determining limits for the use of surveillance technologies. These distinctions developed in the physical world and are rooted in a cultural understanding of pre-digital culture. Attempts to capture the problems emerging with the implementation of security technologies using legal reasoning encounter a number of problems since law is by definition oriented backwards, adapting new developments to existing traditions, whereas the intrusion of new technologies in the physical world produces changes and creates fundamentally new problems.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Rechts- und Kriminalsoziologie, Museumsstr. 5/12, 1070, Vienna, Austria, reinhard.kreissl@univie.ac.at.
authors.forename: Reinhard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kreissl
mesh_terms: D016494:Computer Security; D003219:Confidentiality; D006801:Humans; D007254:Information Science; D007256:Information Systems; D020407:Internet; D018907:Privacy; D066269:Social Theory; D012945:Social Values; D013672:Technology