title: SPIC: a novel similarity metric for comparing transcription factor binding site motifs based on information contents.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Discovering transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) is one of primary challenges to decipher complex gene regulatory networks encrypted in a genome. A set of short DNA sequences identified by a transcription factor (TF) is known as a motif, which can be expressed accurately in matrix form such as a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) and a position frequency matrix. Very frequently, we need to query a motif in a database of motifs by seeking its similar motifs, merge similar TFBS motifs possibly identified by the same TF, separate irrelevant motifs, or filter out spurious motifs. Therefore, a novel metric is required to seize slight differences between irrelevant motifs and highlight the similarity between motifs of the same group in all these applications. While there are already several metrics for motif similarity proposed before, their performance is still far from satisfactory for these applications.
  
  
  METHODS
  A novel metric has been proposed in this paper with name as SPIC (Similarity with Position Information Contents) for measuring the similarity between a column of a motif and a column of another motif. When defining this similarity score, we consider the likelihood that the column of the first motif's PFM can be produced by the column of the second motif's PSSM, and multiply the likelihood by the information content of the column of the second motif's PSSM, and vise versa. We evaluated the performance of SPIC combined with a local or a global alignment method having a function for affine gap penalty, for computing the similarity between two motifs. We also compared SPIC with seven existing state-of-the-arts metrics for their capability of clustering motifs from the same group and retrieving motifs from a database on three datasets.
  
  
  RESULTS
  When used jointly with the Smith-Waterman local alignment method with an affine gap penalty function (gap open penalty is equal to 1, gap extension penalty is equal to 0.5), SPIC outperforms the seven existing state-of-the-art motif similarity metrics combined with their best alignments for matching motifs in database searches, and clustering the same TF's sub-motifs or distinguishing relevant ones from a miscellaneous group of motifs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have developed a novel motif similarity metric that can more accurately match motifs in database searches, and more effectively cluster similar motifs and differentiate irrelevant motifs than do the other seven metrics we are aware of.
authors.forename: Shaoqiang
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Xiguo
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Chuanbin
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Du
authors.forename: Zhengchang
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Su
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001665:Binding Sites; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D030541:Databases, Genetic; D059372:Nucleotide Motifs; D014157:Transcription Factors / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D014157:Transcription Factors