title: The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.
abstract: The expressivist objection to prenatal testing is acknowledged as a significant critique of prenatal testing practices most commonly advanced by disability rights supporters. Such writers argue that prenatal testing and selective termination practices are objectionable as they express disvalue not only of the foetus being tested, but also of disabled people as a whole, by focusing exclusively on the disabling trait. While the objection has been widely critiqued on the basis of its theoretical incoherence, this paper highlights the way in which it, nevertheless, is a significant mediator in decisions around the use of reproductive genetic technologies. By drawing on 41 in-depth qualitative interviews (drawn from a sample of 61) conducted in the UK between 2007 and 2009 with families and individuals living with a genetic disease, Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), this paper highlights the ways in which expressivist objections feature prominently in the reproductive decisions of families living with SMA and the significant emotional burden they represent. While the literature on the expressivist objection has focused on the reproductive decisions of those undergoing prenatal testing for a condition of which they have little (or no) prior knowledge, the context of intimate familial relationships and extensive experience with the tested-for condition fundamentally alters the nature and impact of expressivist objections within families living with an inheritable condition. By focussing on the reproductive decisions of families living with SMA and their strategic management of the expressivist objection, this paper will address the call, made primarily by disability rights supporters, for 'experientially based' (as opposed to medical) information about the tested-for disability to be made available to would-be parents considering selective termination. It will be argued that parents' experiential knowledge of the tested-for disability can, in fact, amplify expressivist objections to prenatal testing, and thus paradoxically constrain, rather than facilitate, reproductive decisions.
authors.affiliation: Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. Electronic address: Felicity.Boardman@warwick.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Felicity Kate
authors.initials: FK
authors.lastname: Boardman
mesh_terms: D000025:Abortion, Eugenic / Q000523:psychology; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003657:Decision Making; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009134:Muscular Atrophy, Spinal / Q000235:genetics* / Q000523:psychology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D006113:United Kingdom; D026712:Value of Life
keywords: Disability rights; Expressivist objection; Genetic risk; Qualitative; Reproductive decision making; Spinal Muscular Atrophy; UK