title: Experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing in women with breast cancer: a systematic review.
abstract: Recurrence tests, such as Adjuvant! Online and Oncotype DX, can be used to determine an individual's risk of developing recurrent cancer. These technologies are useful for helping health care practitioners make treatment recommendations. With increasing use, it is necessary to consider patients' experience with and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing. Factors such as anxiety, influence on decision making, confidence in results, and satisfaction with testing are important to consider. To understand experiences and attitudes toward risk of recurrence testing, from the perspective of women who have used these technologies following a breast cancer diagnosis. A systematic review was completed. Eight multidisciplinary electronic databases, including MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ERIC, were searched from 1950 to December 17, 2012. Abstracts and full-text papers were screened for inclusion, in duplicate, based on established criteria. Recurrent themes and key concepts were identified and analyzed. One-thousand and twenty-two abstracts were retrieved, and fifty-one proceeded to full-text review. Ten studies reporting on eight populations were included in this review. Key themes that emerged from the literature include: experience with the testing process; influence testing has on treatment; and comprehension of results. The literature suggests that testing for breast cancer recurrence can have a negative impact on women; poor comprehension of test results, and anxiety/distress were the most frequently cited reasons for a negative experience. Despite these drawbacks, women consistently reported that they would recommend testing to others. The literature on this topic is limited, and heterogeneous. The available literature suggests that women are generally satisfied with risk of recurrence testing for breast cancer. Potential drawbacks of risk of recurrence testing include anxiety and comprehension of test results. Additional high-quality research on women's experiences with risk of recurrence testing for breast cancer would improve the evidence base, and would allow stronger conclusions to be drawn.
authors.affiliation: The Department Community Health Sciences, 3D18, Teaching Research and Wellness Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
authors.forename: Laura E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Leggett
authors.forename: Diane L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Lorenzetti
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Noseworthy
authors.forename: Simran
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tiwana
authors.forename: Gail
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Mackean
authors.forename: Fiona
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Clement
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires