title: Understanding publication bias in reintroduction biology by assessing translocations of New Zealand's herpetofauna.
abstract: The intentional translocation of animals is an important tool for species conservation and ecosystem restoration, but reported success rates are low, particularly for threatened and endangered species. Publication bias further distorts success rates because the results of successful translocations may be more likely to be published than failed translocations. We conducted the first comprehensive review of all published and unpublished translocations of herpetofauna in New Zealand to assess publication bias. Of 74 translocations of 29 species in 25 years, 35 have been reported in the published literature, and the outcomes of 12 have been published. Using a traditional definition of success, publication bias resulted in a gross overestimate of translocation success rates (41.7% and 8.1% for published and all translocations, respectively), but bias against failed translocations was minimal (8.3% and 6.8%, respectively). Publication bias against translocations with uncertain outcomes, the vast majority of projects, was also strong (50.0% and 85.1% for published and all translocations, respectively). Recent translocations were less likely to be published than older translocations. The reasons behind translocations were related to publication. A greater percentage of translocations for conservation and research were published (63.3% and 40.0%, respectively) than translocations for mitigation during land development (10.0%). Translocations conducted in collaboration with a university were more frequently published (82.7% and 24.4%, respectively). To account for some of this publication bias, we reassessed the outcome of each translocation using a standardized definition of success, which takes into consideration the species' life history and the time since release. Our standardized definition of translocation success provided a more accurate summary of success rates and allows for a more rigorous evaluation of the causes of translocation success and failure in large-scale reviews.
authors.affiliation: Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Building 18, Victoria, 3800, Australia; Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Victoria, Australia. Kim.Miller@unimelb.edu.au.
authors.forename: Kimberly A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: Trent P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Bell
authors.forename: Jennifer M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Germano
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D017753:Ecosystem; D056727:Endangered Species; D009520:New Zealand; D017594:Publication Bias
keywords: Leiopelmatidae; criterios de éxito; reintroducción; reintroduction; success criteria; tuatara