title: Treatment of perforated giant gastric ulcer in an emergency setting.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study and assess clinical outcomes of various modes of treatment for perforated giant gastric ulcer in an emergency setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  From May 2010 to February 2013, 20 cases of perforated giant gastric ulcer (> 2 cm) were operated on in an emergency setting. All the patients presented with features of peritonitis and were resuscitated aggressively before taking for surgery. In the first 4 cases, primary closure was done after taking a biopsy and among these, the 3(rd) case also underwent partial distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy and the 4(th) case underwent a radical subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and gastrojejunostomy for malignancy. All the remaining 16 cases underwent partial distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Among the first 4 cases, 2 had an uneventful recovery and were discharged on the 6(th) postoperative day. The 3(rd) and 4(th) patients developed gastric fistula, leading to prolonged hospitalization. For the 3(rd) patient, conservative management was tried for 1 wk, followed by partial distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy, and he was discharged on the 20(th) day after admission, while the 4(th) patient underwent a radical subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and gastrojejunostomy. Postoperatively, he developed adult respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and expired on the 3(rd) postoperative day of the second surgery. All the remaining 16 patients underwent partial distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy and recovered well. Among these, 4 of them were malignant and the remaining were benign ulcers. All had an uneventful recovery. The percentage of malignancy in our series was 30% (6 out of 20 cases). In our study, 86% had an uneventful recovery, complications were seen in about 10%, and mortality was about 5%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In giant gastric ulcer, the chances of malignancy and leak after primary closure are high. So, we feel that partial distal gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy is better.
authors.affiliation: Pradeep Kumar, Hosni Mubarak Khan, Department of General Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR and Medical College, Bangalore 560010, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: Pradeep
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kumar
authors.affiliation: Pradeep Kumar, Hosni Mubarak Khan, Department of General Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR and Medical College, Bangalore 560010, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: Hosni Mubarak
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.affiliation: Pradeep Kumar, Hosni Mubarak Khan, Department of General Surgery, ESI-PGIMSR and Medical College, Bangalore 560010, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: Safarulla
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hasanrabba
keywords: Biopsy; Gastric; Giant; Partial gastrectomy; Primary closure; Ulcer