title: Reliability and validity of a modified MEDFICTS dietary fat screener in South African schoolchildren are determined by use and outcome measures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In South Africa, noncommunicable diseases and obesity are increasing and also affect children. No validated assessment tools for fat intake are available.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine test-retest reliability and relative validity of a pictorial modified meats, eggs, dairy, fried foods, fats in baked goods, convenience foods, table fats, and snacks (MEDFICTS) dietary fat screener.
  
  
  METHODS
  We determined test-retest reliability and diagnostic accuracy with the modified MEDFICTS as the index test and a 3-day weighed food record and parental completion of the screener as primary and secondary reference methods, respectively.
  
  
  METHODS
  Grade-six learners (aged 12 years, 4 months) in an urban, middle-class school (n=93) and their parents (n=72).
  
  
  METHODS
  Portion size, frequency of intake, final score, and classification of fat intake of the modified MEDFICTS, and percent energy from fat, saturated fatty acids, and cholesterol of the food record.
  
  
  METHODS
  For categorical data agreement was based on kappa statistics, McNemar's test for symmetry, and diagnostic performance parameters. Continuous data were analyzed with correlations, mean differences, the Bland-Altman method, and receiver operating characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The classification of fat intake by the modified MEDFICTS was test-retest reliable. Final scores of the group did not differ between administrations (P=0.86). The correlation of final scores between administrations was significant for girls only (r=0.58; P=0.01). Reliability of portion size and frequency of intake scores depended on the food category. For girls the screener final score was significantly (P<0.5) correlated to total, saturated fat, and cholesterol intakes (but not to percent energy from fat and saturated fatty acids intakes). The sensitivity of the modified MEDFICTS was very high (>90%), but chance corrected agreement between the classifications was poor. Parents did not agree with their children.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Test-retest reliability and relative validity of a modified MEDFICTS dietary fat screener in South African schoolchildren depended on the use and outcome measures applied.
authors.forename: Friedeburg Anna Maria
authors.initials: FAM
authors.lastname: Wenhold
authors.forename: Una Elizabeth
authors.initials: UE
authors.lastname: MacIntyre
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rheeder
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002652:Child Behavior / Q000208:ethnology; D002664:Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena / Q000208:ethnology; D015930:Diet Records; D059305:Diet, High-Fat / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000208:ethnology; D004041:Dietary Fats / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000032:analysis; D057140:Fast Foods / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D055951:Functional Food / Q000032:analysis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015596:Nutrition Assessment; D010290:Parents; D064787:Portion Size / Q000208:ethnology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D057566:Self Report; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D062410:Snacks / Q000208:ethnology; D013019:South Africa; D014504:Urban Health / Q000208:ethnology
chemical_list: D004041:Dietary Fats
keywords: Assessment; Children; Diet; Reliability; Validity