title: A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A virtual reality-based simulator for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures may be used for training and discovery of new tools and procedures. Our previous study (Sankaranarayanan et al. in Surg Endosc 27:1607-1616, 2013) shows that developing such a simulator for the transvaginal cholecystectomy procedure using a rigid endoscope will have the most impact on the field. However, prior to developing such a simulator, a thorough task analysis is necessary to determine the most important phases, tasks, and subtasks of this procedure.
  
  
  METHODS
  19 rigid endoscope transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy procedures and 11 traditional laparoscopic procedures have been recorded and de-identified prior to analysis. Hierarchical task analysis was conducted for the rigid endoscope transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy. A time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of the transvaginal NOTES and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. Finally, a comparison of electrosurgery-based errors was performed by two independent qualified personnel.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The most time-consuming tasks for both laparoscopic and NOTES cholecystectomy are removing areolar and connective tissue surrounding the gallbladder, exposing Calot's triangle, and dissecting the gallbladder off the liver bed with electrosurgery. There is a positive correlation of performance time between the removal of areolar and connective tissue and electrosurgery dissection tasks in NOTES (r = 0.415) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (r = 0.684) with p < 0.10. During the electrosurgery task, the NOTES procedures had fewer errors related to lack of progress in gallbladder removal. Contrarily, laparoscopic procedures had fewer errors due to the instrument being out of the camera view.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A thorough task analysis and video-based quantification of NOTES cholecystectomy has identified the most time-consuming tasks. A comparison of the surgical errors during electrosurgery gallbladder dissection establishes that the NOTES procedure, while still new, is not inferior to the established laparoscopic procedure.
authors.affiliation: Center for Modeling, Simulation and Imaging in Medicine (CeMSIM), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA, nemana@rpi.edu.
authors.forename: Arun
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nemani
authors.forename: Ganesh
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sankaranarayanan
authors.forename: Jaisa S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Olasky
authors.forename: Souheil
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Adra
authors.forename: Kurt E
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.forename: Lucian
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Panait
authors.forename: Steven D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Schwaitzberg
authors.forename: Daniel B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Suvranu
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: De
mesh_terms: D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000379:methods*; D004598:Electrosurgery; D019723:Endoscopes; D005260:Female; D005704:Gallbladder / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D065186:Interrupted Time Series Analysis; D007431:Intraoperative Complications; D057605:Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery / Q000379:methods*; D061646:Operative Time; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery*; D014743:Videotape Recording