title: Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface.
abstract: One of the most challenging treatment planning decisions in restorative dentistry is the retention of a root filled tooth or its extraction and replacement with an implant. Making an informed judgement relies upon not only clinical experience and expertise but also interpretation of the published clinical evidence. In the last few years, more robust data and closer scrutiny of the evidence has helped to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these treatment modalities. The purpose of this paper is to provide a narrative review of some of the factors that may influence treatment planning for root canal treated teeth and indications for whether these teeth would be better replaced by an implant. From the evidence presented it is clear that both treatments have a place in contemporary restorative dental treatment and that survival for both root filled teeth and implants are similar. Unsurprisingly, both these treatment choices require high standards of clinical expertise and careful planning to ensure the best outcome.
authors.affiliation: Emeritus Professor of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee, DD1 4HN.
authors.forename: W P
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Saunders
mesh_terms: D016301:Alveolar Bone Loss / Q000150:complications; D019250:Dental Implants, Single-Tooth; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D004955:Esthetics, Dental; D006184:Habits; D006801:Humans; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000150:complications; D011788:Quality of Life; D012307:Risk Factors; D012390:Root Canal Therapy; D014081:Tooth Extraction