title: Percutaneous adhesiolysis procedures in the medicare population: analysis of utilization and growth patterns from 2000 to 2011.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Multiple reviews have shown that interventional techniques for chronic pain have increased dramatically over the years. Of these interventional techniques, both sacroiliac joint injections and facet joint interventions showed explosive growth, followed by epidural procedures. Percutaneous adhesiolysis procedures have not been assessed for their utilization patterns separately from epidural injections.
  
  
  METHODS
  An analysis of the utilization patterns of percutaneous adhesiolysis procedures in managing chronic low back pain in the Medicare population from 2000 to 2011.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the utilization and growth patterns of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic low back pain.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was performed utilizing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master of Fee-For-Service (FFS) Data from 2000 to 2011.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Percutaneous adhesiolysis procedures increased 47% with an annual growth rate of 3.6% in the FFS Medicare population from 2000 to 2011. These growth rates are significantly lower than the growth rates for sacroiliac joint injections (331%), facet joint interventions (308%), and epidural injections (130%), but substantially lower than lumbar transforaminal injections (665%) and lumbar facet joint neurolysis (544%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Study limitations include lack of inclusion of Medicare Advantage patients. In addition, the statewide data is based on claims which may include the contiguous or other states.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Percutaneous adhesiolysis utilization increased moderately in Medicare beneficiaries from 2000 to 2011. Overall, there was an increase of 47% in the utilization of adhesiolysis procedures per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries, with an annual geometric average increase of 3.6%.
authors.affiliation: Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; The Helm Center for Pain Management, Laguna Hills, CA; and Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.
authors.forename: Laxmaiah
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Manchikanti
authors.forename: Standiford
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Helm Ii
authors.forename: Vidyasagar
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Pampati
authors.forename: Gabor B
authors.initials: GB
authors.lastname: Racz
mesh_terms: D017677:Age Distribution; D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D059350:Chronic Pain / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D007268:Injections, Epidural / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D006278:Medicare / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D044382:Population Groups; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014481:United States