title: Threat ≠ prevention, challenge ≠ promotion: the impact of threat, challenge and regulatory focus on attention to negative stimuli.
abstract: The purpose of the current experiment was to distinguish between the impact of strategic and affective forms of gain- and loss-related motivational states on the attention to negative stimuli. On the basis of the counter-regulation principle and regulatory focus theory, we predicted that individuals would attend more to negative than to neutral stimuli in a prevention focus and when experiencing challenge, but not in a promotion focus and under threat. In one experiment (N = 88) promotion, prevention, threat, or challenge states were activated through a memory task, and a subsequent dot probe task was administered. As predicted, those in the prevention focus and challenge conditions had an attentional bias towards negative words, but those in promotion and threat conditions did not. These findings provide support for the idea that strategic mindsets (e.g., regulatory focus) and hot emotional states (e.g., threat vs. challenge) differently affect the processing of affective stimuli.
authors.affiliation: a Social Processes Lab , Knowledge Media Research Center , Tübingen , Germany.
authors.forename: Kai
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sassenberg
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sassenrath
authors.forename: Adam K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Fetterman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011930:Reaction Time; D012927:Social Control, Informal; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Attention; Challenge; Regulatory focus; Self-regulation; Threat