title: Meta-analysis of attitudes toward damage-causing mammalian wildlife.
abstract: Many populations of threatened mammals persist outside formally protected areas, and their survival depends on the willingness of communities to coexist with them. An understanding of the attitudes, and specifically the tolerance, of individuals and communities and the factors that determine these is therefore fundamental to designing strategies to alleviate human-wildlife conflict. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify factors that affected attitudes toward 4 groups of terrestrial mammals. Elephants (65%) elicited the most positive attitudes, followed by primates (55%), ungulates (53%), and carnivores (44%). Urban residents presented the most positive attitudes (80%), followed by commercial farmers (51%) and communal farmers (26%). A tolerance to damage index showed that human tolerance of ungulates and primates was proportional to the probability of experiencing damage while elephants elicited tolerance levels higher than anticipated and carnivores elicited tolerance levels lower than anticipated. Contrary to conventional wisdom, experiencing damage was not always the dominant factor determining attitudes. Communal farmers had a lower probability of being positive toward carnivores irrespective of probability of experiencing damage, while commercial farmers and urban residents were more likely to be positive toward carnivores irrespective of damage. Urban residents were more likely to be positive toward ungulates, elephants, and primates when probability of damage was low, but not when it was high. Commercial and communal farmers had a higher probability of being positive toward ungulates, primates, and elephants irrespective of probability of experiencing damage. Taxonomic bias may therefore be important. Identifying the distinct factors explaining these attitudes and the specific contexts in which they operate, inclusive of the species causing damage, will be essential for prioritizing conservation investments.
authors.affiliation: Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. ruthkansky@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: Ruth
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kansky
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kidd
authors.forename: Andrew T
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Knight
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001290:Attitude; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D019049:Developed Countries; D003906:Developing Countries; D006801:Humans; D008322:Mammals / Q000502:physiology*; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
keywords: Carnívoros; carnivores; conflicto humano-vida silvestre; conservation psychology; elefante; elephant; human-wildlife conflict; primates; psicología de la conservación; tolerance; tolerancia; ungulado; ungulates