title: Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems.
abstract: Physical activity has a positive impact on people's well-being and it had been shown to decrease the occurrence of chronic diseases in the older adult population. To date, a substantial amount of research studies exist, which focus on activity recognition using inertial sensors. Many of these studies adopt a single sensor approach and focus on proposing novel features combined with complex classifiers to improve the overall recognition accuracy. In addition, the implementation of the advanced feature extraction algorithms and the complex classifiers exceed the computing ability of most current wearable sensor platforms. This paper proposes a method to adopt multiple sensors on distributed body locations to overcome this problem. The objective of the proposed system is to achieve higher recognition accuracy with "light-weight" signal processing algorithms, which run on a distributed computing based sensor system comprised of computationally efficient nodes. For analysing and evaluating the multi-sensor system, eight subjects were recruited to perform eight normal scripted activities in different life scenarios, each repeated three times. Thus a total of 192 activities were recorded resulting in 864 separate annotated activity states. The methods for designing such a multi-sensor system required consideration of the following: signal pre-processing algorithms, sampling rate, feature selection and classifier selection. Each has been investigated and the most appropriate approach is selected to achieve a trade-off between recognition accuracy and computing execution time. A comparison of six different systems, which employ single or multiple sensors, is presented. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed multi-sensor system can achieve an overall recognition accuracy of 96.4% by adopting the mean and variance features, using the Decision Tree classifier. The results demonstrate that elaborate classifiers and feature sets are not required to achieve high recognition accuracies on a multi-sensor system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland. Electronic address: lei.gao@ul.ie.
authors.forename: Lei
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.affiliation: Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland.
authors.forename: A K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Bourke
authors.affiliation: Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Nelson
mesh_terms: D061725:Accelerometry / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D018670:Monitoring, Ambulatory / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013848:Thigh; D013909:Thorax; D013995:Time; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology
keywords: Accelerometer; Activities of daily living; Activity recognition; Multi-sensor fusion