title: Prediction of formulation effects on dermal absorption of topically applied ectoparasiticides dosed in vitro on canine and porcine skin using a mixture-adjusted quantitative structure permeability relationship.
abstract: Topical application of ectoparasiticides for flea and tick control is a major focus for product development in animal health. The objective of this work was to develop a quantitative structure permeability relationship (QSPeR) model sensitive to formulation effects for predicting absorption and skin deposition of five topically applied drugs administered in six vehicle combinations to porcine and canine skin in vitro. Saturated solutions (20 μL) of (14) C-labeled demiditraz, fipronil, permethrin, imidacloprid, or sisapronil were administered in single or binary (50:50 v/v) combinations of water, ethanol, and transcutol (6 formulations, n = 4-5 replicates per treatment) nonoccluded to 0.64 cm(2) disks of dermatomed pig or dog skin mounted in flow-through diffusion cells. Perfusate flux over 24 h and skin deposition at termination were determined. Permeability (logKp), absorption, and penetration endpoints were modeled using a four-term Abrahams and Martin (hydrogen-bond donor acidity and basicity, dipolarity/polarizability, and excess molar refractivity) linear free energy QSPeR equation with a mixture factor added to compensate for formulation ingredient interactions. Goodness of fit was judged by r(2) , cross-validation coefficient, coefficients (q(2) s), and Williams Plot to visualize the applicability domain. Formulation composition was the primary determinant of permeation. Compounds generally penetrated dog skin better than porcine skin. The vast majority of permeated penetrant was deposited within the dosed skin relative to transdermal flux, an attribute for ectoparasiticides. The best QSPeR logKp model for pig skin permeation (r(2) = 0.86, q(2) s = 0.85) included log octanol/water partition coefficient as the mixture factor, while for dogs (r(2) = 0.91, q(2) s = 0.90), it was log water solubility. These studies clearly showed that the permeation of topical ectoparasiticides could be well predicted using QSPeR models that account for both the physical-chemical properties of the penetrant and formulation components.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and Pharmacokinetics, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Riviere
authors.forename: J D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Brooks
authors.forename: W T
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Collard
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Deng
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: de Rose
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Mahabir
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Merritt
authors.forename: A A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Marchiondo
mesh_terms: D000287:Administration, Topical; D000818:Animals; D055598:Chemical Phenomena; D004285:Dogs; D007306:Insecticides / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D008954:Models, Biological; D010539:Permeability; D012867:Skin / Q000187:drug effects*; D012869:Skin Absorption / Q000502:physiology*; D013552:Swine; D046509:Tissue Culture Techniques
chemical_list: D007306:Insecticides