title: Transient protein-protein interface prediction: datasets, features, algorithms, and the RAD-T predictor.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Transient protein-protein interactions (PPIs), which underly most biological processes, are a prime target for therapeutic development. Immense progress has been made towards computational prediction of PPIs using methods such as protein docking and sequence analysis. However, docking generally requires high resolution structures of both of the binding partners and sequence analysis requires that a significant number of recurrent patterns exist for the identification of a potential binding site. Researchers have turned to machine learning to overcome some of the other methods' restrictions by generalising interface sites with sets of descriptive features. Best practices for dataset generation, features, and learning algorithms have not yet been identified or agreed upon, and an analysis of the overall efficacy of machine learning based PPI predictors is due, in order to highlight potential areas for improvement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The presence of unknown interaction sites as a result of limited knowledge about protein interactions in the testing set dramatically reduces prediction accuracy. Greater accuracy in labelling the data by enforcing higher interface site rates per domain resulted in an average 44% improvement across multiple machine learning algorithms. A set of 10 biologically unrelated proteins that were consistently predicted on with high accuracy emerged through our analysis. We identify seven features with the most predictive power over multiple datasets and machine learning algorithms. Through our analysis, we created a new predictor, RAD-T, that outperforms existing non-structurally specializing machine learning protein interface predictors, with an average 59% increase in MCC score on a dataset with a high number of interactions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Current methods of evaluating machine-learning based PPI predictors tend to undervalue their performance, which may be artificially decreased by the presence of un-identified interaction sites. Changes to predictors' training sets will be integral to the future progress of interface prediction by machine learning methods. We reveal the need for a larger test set of well studied proteins or domain-specific scoring algorithms to compensate for poor interaction site identification on proteins in general.
authors.forename: Calem J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Bendell
authors.forename: Shalon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Tristan
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Aumentado-Armstrong
authors.forename: Bogdan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Istrate
authors.forename: Paul T
authors.initials: PT
authors.lastname: Cernek
authors.forename: Samuel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.forename: Sergiu
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Picioreanu
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill, Montreal, CA. robert.murgita@mcgill.ca.
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Murgita
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D001665:Binding Sites; D054730:Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins