title: A call for change: clinical evaluation of student registered nurse anesthetists.
abstract: The ability to integrate theory with practice is integral to a student's success. A common reason for attrition from a nurse anesthesia program is clinical issues. To document clinical competence, students are evaluated using various tools. For use of a clinical evaluation tool as possible evidence for a student's dismissal, an important psychometric property to ensure is instrument validity. Clinical evaluation instruments of nurse anesthesia programs are not standardized among programs, which suggests a lack of instrument validity. The lack of established validity of the instruments used to evaluate students' clinical progress brings into question their ability to detect a student who is truly in jeopardy of attrition. Given this possibility, clinical instrument validity warrants research to be fair to students and improve attrition rates based on valid data. This ex post facto study evaluated a 17-item clinical instrument tool to demonstrate the need for validity of clinical evaluation tools. It also compared clinical scores with scores on the National Certification Examination.
authors.forename: Shawn
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Collins
authors.forename: Margaret Faut
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Callahan
mesh_terms: D002568:Certification; D003162:Competency-Based Education / Q000592:standards*; D004511:Education, Nursing, Graduate / Q000592:standards*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D009719:Nurse Anesthetists / Q000193:education*; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000592:standards; D013332:Student Dropouts / Q000523:psychology*; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*