title: Patients with hip fracture admitted to critical care: epidemiology, interventions and outcome.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although there is much current debate about the use of critical care to enhance peri-operative care of patients with hip fracture there are limited supporting data. We investigated the epidemiology, critical care interventions and outcomes of patients with hip fracture admitted to a large UK critical care unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  We reviewed all patients with hip fracture (excluding those with multiple trauma, and those with femoral shaft or peri-prosthetic fracture) who were admitted to our critical care unit during a four year period. We recorded patient characteristics, reason for admission to critical care, interventions and organ support performed, and patient outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified 99 patients with a mean age of 81 years; this represented 1% of patients admitted to critical care, and 2.4% of patients with hip fracture admitted to hospital during the study period. Fifty-two patients required no organ support; 19 received only respiratory support, 13 only cardiovascular support, 12 received both respiratory and cardiovascular support, and 3 received respiratory, cardiovascular and renal support. Outcome worsened as the level of organ support increased (p=0.01). Fifteen patients died in critical care, acute hospital mortality was 33% and 1-year mortality was 54%. No patient for whom admission was planned before surgery died in critical care and the 30-day mortality for this group was 13%. Outcome was related to the time between surgery and critical care admission: patients admitted before surgery or longer than 2 days after surgery had worse outcomes (p=0.001). The reason for admission to critical care also influenced outcome: patients with sepsis had poor outcome with one-third dying in critical care and a further one-third not surviving to hospital discharge.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The major determinants of outcome in this population were reason for admission, and timing of admission to critical care. One year survival was better than that for unselected patients aged >80 years admitted to critical care. Admission to critical care and use of enhanced peri-operative care for selected hip fracture patients is entirely appropriate and beneficial.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Alistair A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Gibson
authors.affiliation: Department of Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Alasdair W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Hay
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Electronic address: david.ray@luht.scot.nhs.uk.
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Ray
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015897:Comorbidity; D003422:Critical Care; D005260:Female; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000150:complications / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology
keywords: Complication; Critical care; Geriatric fracture; Hip fracture; Mortality; Organ support; Outcome