title: How to use health and nutrition-related claims correctly on food advertising: comparison of benefit-seeking, risk-avoidance, and taste appeals on different food categories.
abstract: This study applies the concepts of health halos and unhealthy = tasty intuition to examine how the different health and nutrition-related (HNR) appeal types interact with different food product types compared with taste claims. The experiment investigated the impact of benefit-seeking and risk-avoidance HNR appeals compared with that of taste appeals on different food types. The authors found that although respondents evaluated food ads with the two HNR appeals as less risky/more beneficial and healthier than food ads with a taste claim, the respondents showed better ad-related evaluations on the HNR appeals for perceivably healthy food and on taste appeal for perceivably unhealthy food. The findings provide several theoretical and practical implications for health food marketing and public health policy.
authors.affiliation: a Jack J. Valenti School of Communication , College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Houston , Houston , Texas , USA.
authors.forename: Hojoon
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.forename: Jeffrey K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Springston
mesh_terms: D000329:Advertising; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004032:Diet / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D005502:Food / Q000145:classification; D005504:Food Analysis; D058870:Food, Organic; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009753:Nutritive Value; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013649:Taste