Endoscopic management of posterior epistaxis: a review.
The paradigm for the management of epistaxis, specifically posterior epistaxis, has undergone significant changes in the recent past. Recent prospective and retrospective data has shown that the endonasal surgical management of posterior epistaxis is superior to posterior nasal packing and angiography/embolization with regards to various factors including pain, cost-effectiveness, risk and overall control of bleeding. Endonasal endoscopic surgical techniques for posterior epistaxis include direct cauterization and transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine/ posterior nasal artery ligation or cauterization with or without control of the anterior ethmoidal artery. Despite the evidence provided by the current literature, a universal treatment protocol has not yet been established. This review article provides an up-to-date assessment of the available literature, and presents a structured paradigm for the management of posterior epistaxis.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
S W
SW
McClurg
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
R
R
Carrau
D004724:Endoscopy; D004844:Epistaxis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans
Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation; Epistaxis; Posterior epistaxis; Sphenopalatine artery