Neonatal viability evaluation by Apgar score in puppies delivered by cesarean section in two brachycephalic breeds (English and French bulldog).
This study tried to define neonatal viability after cesarean section in brachycephalic breeds and the efficacy of an adapted Apgar test to assess newborn survival. Data from 44 cesarean sections and 302 puppies were included. Before surgery (59-61 days after ovulation), an ultrasound evaluation defined the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD). Immediately after the uterine delivery, the pups were evaluated to detect birth defects and then, a modified Apgar score (range: 0-10) was used to define neonatal health at 5min (Apgar 1) and 60min (Apgar 2) after neonatal delivery; puppies were classified into three categories: critical neonates (score: 0-3), moderate viability neonates (score: 4-6) and normal viability neonates (score: 7-10). Mean (±SEM) value of BPD was 30.8±0.1mm and 28.9±0.1mm in English and French Bull-Dog fetus, respectively. The incidence of spontaneous neonatal mortality (4.98%, 14/281) and birth defects (6.95%) were not influenced by the sex; however, congenital anomalies and neonatal mortality were higher (p<0.01) in those litters with a greater number of neonates. In Apgar 1, the percentage of critical neonates, moderate viability neonates and normal viability neonates were 20.5%, 46.3% and 33.1% respectively; sixty minutes after birth, the critical neonates only represented 10.3% of the total puppies. Almost all neonates (238/239) showing moderate or normal viability at Apgar 1, survived for the first 24h after birth. The results of the study showed a direct relationship (p<0.01) between the Apgar score and neonatal viability. Therefore, the routine performance of the Apgar score would appear to be essential in the assessment of the status of brachycephalic breed puppies.
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain. Electronic address: mbatista@dpat.ulpgc.es.
M
M
Batista
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
C
C
Moreno
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
J
J
Vilar
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
M
M
Golding
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
C
C
Brito
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
M
M
Santana
Unit of Reproduction and Obstetrics, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Transmontaña s/n 35413, Arucas, Las Palmas, Spain.
D
D
Alamo
D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn / Q000502:physiology*; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000662:veterinary*; D004285:Dogs / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008098:Litter Size; D008297:Male; D011247:Pregnancy; D011379:Prognosis
Apgar score; Brachycephalic breed; Dog; Neonate; Viability