Confirming feedback following a mistaken identification impairs memory for the culprit.
This research examined whether confirming postidentification feedback following a mistaken identification impairs eyewitness memory for the original culprit. We also examined whether the degree of similarity between a mistakenly identified individual and the actual culprit plays a role in memory impairment. Participant-witnesses (N = 145) made mistaken identifications from a "similar" or a "dissimilar" culprit-absent photo lineup. The similar lineup contained individuals who were similar in appearance to the actual culprit and the dissimilar lineup contained individuals who were dissimilar in appearance to the actual culprit. After their identifications, witnesses were given confirming feedback ("Good job! You identified the suspect.") or no feedback. The experimenter then feigned having accidentally given the witnesses the wrong photo lineup. After telling witnesses to disregard whatever they saw in the first lineup, the experimenter gave witnesses the "correct" (culprit-present) lineup and told the witnesses to do their best to identify the culprit. Identifying a dissimilar individual and receiving confirming feedback after a misidentification had independent impairing effects on memory for the original culprit. Results extend the traditional conceptualization of the postidentification feedback effect by showing that confirming feedback not only distorts witnesses' retrospective self-reports, but it also impairs recognition memory for the culprit.
Psychology Department, Iowa State University.
Laura
L
Smalarz
Psychology Department, Iowa State University.
Gary L
GL
Wells
D003415:Crime / Q000523:psychology*; D008192:Deception; D005246:Feedback; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D010865:Pilot Projects; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D035501:Uncertainty; D014796:Visual Perception