The spatial Stroop effect: a comparison of color-word and position-word interference.
The Stroop effect is one of the most famous examples of interference in human perception. The present study demonstrates that a position Stroop paradigm, comparable to the classical color-word interference paradigm, resulted in the same pattern of interference for the spatial dimension; however, the interference was significantly weaker. By exchanging the original oral response for a manual response in the spatial paradigm, we showed that the verbal component is crucial for the Stroop effect: Manual responses lead to a disappearance of the interference effect. Moreover, with manual responses word position was recognized at the same speed for the baseline condition and for words that were incongruent as well as congruent with the spatial position. The results indicate (1) that the Stoop effect depends heavily on verbal components and (2) that differing processing speeds between reading and position recognition do not serve as a proper explanation for the effect. In addition, the provided paradigm plausibly transfers the classical color-word interference to the spatial dimension.
Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximiliens-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, München, Germany, sven.hilbert@psy.lmu.de.
Sven
S
Hilbert
Tristan Toyo
TT
Nakagawa
Manuela
M
Bindl
Markus
M
Bühner
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011932:Reading; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D057190:Stroop Test; D055815:Young Adult