Inferring the degree of incipient speciation in secondary contact zones of closely related lineages of Palearctic green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup).
Reproductive isolation between lineages is expected to accumulate with divergence time, but the time taken to speciate may strongly vary between different groups of organisms. In anuran amphibians, laboratory crosses can still produce viable hybrid offspring >20 My after separation, but the speed of speciation in closely related anuran lineages under natural conditions is poorly studied. Palearctic green toads (Bufo viridis subgroup) offer an excellent system to address this question, comprising several lineages that arose at different times and form secondary contact zones. Using mitochondrial and nuclear markers, we previously demonstrated that in Sicily, B. siculus and B. balearicus developed advanced reproductive isolation after Plio-Pleistocene divergence (2.6 My, 3.3-1.9), with limited historic mtDNA introgression, scarce nuclear admixture, but low, if any, current gene flow. Here, we study genetic interactions between younger lineages of early Pleistocene divergence (1.9 My, 2.5-1.3) in northeastern Italy (B. balearicus, B. viridis). We find significantly more, asymmetric nuclear and wider, differential mtDNA introgression. The population structure seems to be molded by geographic distance and barriers (rivers), much more than by intrinsic genomic incompatibilities. These differences of hybridization between zones may be partly explained by differences in the duration of previous isolation. Scattered research on other anurans suggests that wide hybrid zones with strong introgression may develop when secondary contacts occur <2 My after divergence, whereas narrower zones with restricted gene flow form when divergence exceeds 3 My. Our study strengthens support for this rule of thumb by comparing lineages with different divergence times within the same radiation.
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, Lausanne, Switzerland.
C
C
Dufresnes
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
L
L
Bonato
Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia, Sezione Erpetologia e Ittiologia delle Acque Interne, Venezia, Italy.
N
N
Novarini
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, Lausanne, Switzerland.
C
C
Betto-Colliard
Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, Lausanne, Switzerland.
N
N
Perrin
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany.
M
M
Stöck
D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002025:Bufonidae / Q000235:genetics*; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D051456:Gene Flow; D005819:Genetic Markers / Q000235:genetics; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D005843:Geography; D006824:Hybridization, Genetic / Q000235:genetics*; D007558:Italy; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D060047:Reproductive Isolation; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D005819:Genetic Markers