title: Feedback versus no feedback in improving patient outcome in group psychotherapy for eating disorders (F-EAT): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Continuous feedback on patient improvement and the therapeutic alliance may reduce the number of dropouts and increase patient outcome. There are, however, only three published randomized trials on the effect of feedback on the treatment of eating disorders, showing inconclusive results, and there are no randomized trials on the effect of feedback in group therapy. Accordingly the current randomized clinical trial, initiated in September 2012 at the outpatient clinic for eating disorders at Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, aims to investigate the impact of continuous feedback on attendance and outcome in group psychotherapy.
  
  
  METHODS
  The hypothesis is that continuous feedback to both patient and therapist on treatment progress and alliance will increase attendance and treatment outcome. The trial is set up using a randomized design with a minimum of 128 patients allocated to either an experimental or control group at a ratio of 1:1. The experimental group will receive standard treatment (systemic and narrative group psychotherapy) with feedback intervention, whereas the control group will receive standard treatment only. The participants are diagnosed with bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, or an eating disorder not otherwise specified, according to the DSM-IV. In the experimental group feedback to the participants, based on the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Group Session Rating Scale (GSRS), is actively added to standard treatment. The ORS assesses areas of life functioning known to change as a result of therapeutic intervention. The GSRS assesses key dimensions of effective therapeutic relationships. In the control group, the patients fill out the Outcome Rating Scale only, and feedback is not provided.The primary outcome is the rate of attendance to treatment sessions. The secondary outcome is the severity of eating disorder symptoms. Exploratory outcomes are the level of psychological and social functioning, and suicide or self-harm. This is measured with the ORS, Symptom Check List, WHO-Five Wellbeing Index, Sheehan Disability Scale and a modified version of the Self-Harm Inventory.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  If the results will confirm the hypothesis, this trial will support feedback as a way to improve group treatment attendance for outpatients with eating disorders.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01693237.
authors.affiliation: Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Stolpegaardsvej 20, Gentofte 2820, Denmark. annika.helgadottir.davidsen@regionh.dk.
authors.forename: Annika Helgadóttir
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Davidsen
authors.forename: Stig
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Poulsen
authors.forename: Mette
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Waaddegaard
authors.forename: Jane
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lindschou
authors.forename: Marianne
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lau
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D057189:Checklist; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003718:Denmark; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D001068:Feeding and Eating Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010349:Patient Compliance; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group; D012107:Research Design; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012919:Social Behavior; D013405:Suicide / Q000523:psychology; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2010 Apr;7(4):16-20
references.pmid: 20508804
references.citation: J Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;61(2):145-53
references.pmid: 15609360
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 18;157(6):429-38
references.pmid: 22945832
references.citation: Psychother Res. 2013;23(3):287-300
references.pmid: 23656489
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):15-22
references.pmid: 19567889
references.citation: Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Dec;47(4):616-30
references.pmid: 21198247
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Feb 27;344:e1119
references.pmid: 22371859
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1976 Mar;128:280-9
references.pmid: 1252693
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2001 Dec 4;135(11):982-9
references.pmid: 11730399
references.citation: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Apr;28(3):247-54
references.pmid: 15857725
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1998 Dec;19(6):589-601
references.pmid: 9875838
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Apr;60(4):426-8
references.pmid: 19339314
references.citation: J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57
references.pmid: 9881538
references.citation: BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 03;13:4
references.pmid: 23286337
references.citation: Br J Clin Psychol. 2006 Mar;45(Pt 1):111-21
references.pmid: 16480570
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jul;69(1):69-79
references.pmid: 20630265
references.citation: Fam Process. 1998 Spring;37(1):3-15
references.pmid: 9589278
references.citation: Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jul;45:40-41
references.pmid: 28578218
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):116-28
references.pmid: 2161310
references.citation: Fam Process. 2010 Dec;49(4):457-85
references.pmid: 21083549
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;80(4):547-59
references.pmid: 22506792
references.citation: Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Mar;23(2):70-83
references.pmid: 18301121
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):159-72
references.pmid: 11393594
references.citation: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973 Jan;9(1):13-28
references.pmid: 4682398
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;183:228-32
references.pmid: 12948996
references.citation: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Feb;109(2):96-103
references.pmid: 14725589
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):311-9
references.pmid: 19074978
references.citation: Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11 Suppl 3:89-95
references.pmid: 8923116
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Mar 15;336(7644):601-5
references.pmid: 18316340
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1996 Oct;51(10):1059-64
references.pmid: 8870542