title: Early evidence kits in sexual assault: an observational study of spermatozoa detection in urine and other forensic specimens.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the detection frequency of spermatozoa in early evidence kit specimens and in subsequent full forensic specimens in alleged sexual assault.
  
  
  METHODS
  Observational cohort study of 100 consecutive alleged sexual assault cases, presenting in Western Australia between 19th July 2008 and 6th February 2012, with both early evidence kit and full forensic evidence specimen collections. Eighty-eight cases were included in the study. Smears from all forensic specimens were analyzed by light microscopy to determine the detection frequency and structural characteristics of spermatozoa. Patient demographic features, characteristics of the alleged assault and details and timing of forensic collections were also recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens in 35 % (31/88) and in full forensic specimens in 42 % (37/88) of all cases (irrespective of type of alleged penetration). In alleged penile-vaginal penetration, spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens in 40 % (21/53) of cases when both first void urine and vulval gauze wipe were collected. Spermatozoa were detected in full forensic specimens in 45 % (31/69) of cases. Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit oral rinse specimens in 6 % (1/18) of cases of alleged penile-oral penetration and in early evidence perianal gauze wipe specimens in 33 % (2/6) cases of alleged penile-anal penetration. Spermatozoa were detected in the early evidence kit first void urine specimen in a single case, 11 % (1/9), in which the nature of the alleged assault was unknown. Spermatozoa were detected in early evidence kit specimens and not in full forensic specimens in 3 % (3/88) of cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Early evidence kit specimens are effective in recovery of spermatozoa, and in particular urine and vulval gauze wipe are worthwhile early forensic specimens for the detection of spermatozoa. Collection of early evidence specimens led to detection of spermatozoa-positive cases, which were not detected by subsequent full forensic specimen collection.
authors.affiliation: Sexual Assault Resource Centre, Perth, WA, Australia, debbiesmith@amnet.net.au.
authors.forename: Debbie A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Laurance G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Webb
authors.forename: Angelika I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Fennell
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Nathan
authors.forename: Christine A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Bassindale
authors.forename: Maureen A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Phillips
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D035846:Law Enforcement; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011902:Rape / Q000175:diagnosis*; D013048:Specimen Handling; D013094:Spermatozoa; D013194:Staining and Labeling; D013997:Time Factors; D016482:Urinalysis; D014556:Urine / Q000166:cytology; D014844:Vulva / Q000166:cytology; D014904:Western Australia; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Jul;7(4):434-43
references.pmid: 23623709
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Apr;35(4):358-62
references.pmid: 10736122
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 1982 Mar-Apr;19(2):135-54
references.pmid: 7040183
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 2005 Feb;98(2):49-53
references.pmid: 15684353
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Sep 18;180(2-3):98-104
references.pmid: 18768274
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Sep 10;221(1-3):137-41
references.pmid: 22607978
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Jun;21(6):727-31
references.pmid: 1590616
references.citation: J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 Aug-Nov;13(6-8):300-3
references.pmid: 16931100
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Feb;27(1):77-90
references.pmid: 23062592
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jun;39(6):639-47
references.pmid: 12023707
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1985 May;14(5):447-53
references.pmid: 3985466
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;39(1):39-46
references.pmid: 11782729
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Jan 28;131(2-3):125-30
references.pmid: 12590050
references.citation: CMAJ. 1999 Jun 1;160(11):1565-9
references.pmid: 10373997
references.citation: JAMA. 1978 Oct 20;240(17):1875-7
references.pmid: 567701
references.citation: CMAJ. 2009 Mar 3;180(5):493-4
references.pmid: 19255067