title: iPads in Breast Imaging - A Phantom Study.
abstract: Introduction:Modern tablet PCs as the iPad are becoming more and more integrated into medicine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the display quality of iPads regarding digital mammography.Materials and Methods:Three experienced readers compared the display quality of the iPad 2 and 3 with a dedicated 10 megapixel (MP) mammography liquid crystal display (LCD) screen in consensus using the standardized Contrast Detail Mammography (CDMAM) phantom. Phantom fields without agreement between the readers were classified as "uncertain", correct 2 : 1 decisions were classified as "uncertain/readable". In a second step display quality of the three reading devices was judged subjectively in a side by side comparison.Results:The 10 MP screen was superior to both iPads in 4 (phantom-)fields and inferior in 2 fields. Comparing the iPads, version 3 was superior in 4 fields and version 2 was superior in 1 field. However these differences were not significant. Total number of "uncertain" fields did not show significant differences. The number of "uncertain" fields was 15 with the 10 MP screen, 16 with the iPad 2 and 17 with the iPad 3 (p > 0.05), the number of "uncertain/readable" fields was 4, 7 and 8, respectively. Subjective image quality of the iPad 3 and the 10 MP screen was rated superior to the iPad 2.Conclusion:The evaluated iPads, especially in version 3, seem to be adequate to display mammograms in a diagnostic quality and thus could be useful e.g. for patient consultation, clinical demonstration or educational and teaching purposes. However primary mammogram reading should still be performed on dedicated large sized reading screens.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hammon
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
authors.forename: P M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Schlechtweg
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schulz-Wendtland
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Uder
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Schwab
keywords: CDMAM phantom; education/teaching; iPad; mammography; patient consultation
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun;26(3):383-92
references.pmid: 23250720
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):619-26
references.pmid: 19589307
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(8):1023-8
references.pmid: 22503894
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):127-33
references.pmid: 22173819
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2012 Jun;19(6):746-51
references.pmid: 22578228
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct;25(5):628-34
references.pmid: 22562174
references.citation: Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2006 Feb;99(2):95-101
references.pmid: 16555691
references.citation: J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Oct;9(10):759-60
references.pmid: 23025875
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):112-20
references.pmid: 21641573
references.citation: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Nov;15(11):2866-73
references.pmid: 18070779
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):323-7
references.pmid: 22450843
references.citation: Radiologe. 2011 May;51(5):392-6
references.pmid: 21487798
references.citation: J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):42-4
references.pmid: 23290673
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Dec;65(12):1746
references.pmid: 22578789
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD001877
references.pmid: 21249649