title: Facts and myths in serological screening of ART couples.
abstract: Serological screening of couples attending for ART therapy is now common practice. The frequency of such screening is a topic of debate as few publications have addressed this question. Emerging evidence shows that the ART population has similar prevalence of infectious diseases compared with the general EU population. The need to pursue repeat screening is mainly related to the risk of seroconversion in this highly selected population. The -evidence presented here shows that seroconversion among cohabitating ART couples is negligible. Even if a -theoretical risk of seroconversion during therapy exists, with correct laboratory practice the risk of cross--contamination is negligible as laboratory processing eliminates the infective risk. As such ART laboratory processing of contaminated samples becomes an indication rather than a risk. To strengthen the evidence it is recommended that data on prevalence and incidence should be prospectively collected by all ART units.
authors.affiliation: Human Assisted Reproduction Ireland and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Rotunda Hospital, Dublin.
authors.forename: E V
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Mocanu
keywords: ART; European reports; assisted reproduction; incidence; prevalence; seroconversion risk; serological viral screening
references.citation: Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011 Dec;14(4):224-9
references.pmid: 22088129
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1986 Feb 6;314(6):386
references.pmid: 3945259
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Dec;25(12):3058-65
references.pmid: 20956268
references.citation: J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Jul;16(6):337-9
references.pmid: 10394532
references.citation: Lancet. 1992 Nov 28;340(8831):1317-9
references.pmid: 1360037
references.citation: Lancet. 1998 Jun 13;351(9118):1812-3
references.pmid: 9635976
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Mar 15;273(11):854-8
references.pmid: 7869555
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2011 Nov;26(11):3169-72
references.pmid: 21865236
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2006 May;21(5):1117-21
references.pmid: 16361281
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):1012-1015
references.pmid: 19328477
references.citation: BJOG. 2001 Jun;108(6):654-6
references.pmid: 11426904
references.citation: AIDS. 2007 Sep 12;21(14):1909-14
references.pmid: 17721098
references.citation: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Mar;18(3):310-1
references.pmid: 10093965