title: SPEECH SEGMENTATION IN A SIMULATED BILINGUAL ENVIRONMENT: A CHALLENGE FOR STATISTICAL LEARNING?
abstract: Studies using artificial language streams indicate that infants and adults can use statistics to correctly segment words. However, most studies have utilized only a single input language. Given the prevalence of bilingualism, how is multiple language input segmented? One particular problem may occur if learners combine input across languages: the statistics of particular units that overlap different languages may subsequently change and disrupt correct segmentation. Our study addresses this issue by employing artificial language streams to simulate the earliest stages of segmentation in adult L2-learners. In four experiments, participants tracked multiple sets of statistics for two artificial languages. Our results demonstrate that adult learners can track two sets of statistics simultaneously, suggesting that they form multiple representations when confronted with bilingual input. This work, along with planned infant experiments, informs a central issue in bilingualism research, namely, determining at what point listeners can form multiple representations when exposed to multiple languages.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
authors.forename: Daniel J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Weiss
authors.affiliation: Department of Spanish and Program in Linguistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
authors.forename: Chip
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gerfen
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
authors.forename: Aaron D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Mitchel
keywords: Bilingualism; Language Differentiation; Language Segmentation; Multiple Representations; Statistical Learning
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Jan;82(3):B101-11
references.pmid: 11747867
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Apr;60(3):355-76
references.pmid: 9599989
references.citation: Cognition. 1988 Jul;29(2):143-78
references.pmid: 3168420
references.citation: Cognition. 2005 Sep;97(2):B25-34
references.pmid: 16226557
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2003 Jul;39(4):706-16
references.pmid: 12859124
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 1994 Jan 1;5(1):42-46
references.pmid: 21526138
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1990 Apr;47(4):379-90
references.pmid: 2345691
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1985 Jun;12(2):297-324
references.pmid: 4019605
references.citation: Cognition. 2006 Jun;100(2):369-88
references.pmid: 16115614
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Feb;67(2):224-38
references.pmid: 15971687
references.citation: Science. 2000 Apr 14;288(5464):349-51
references.pmid: 10764650
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2005 Sep;51(2):141-78
references.pmid: 16095588
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):633-64
references.pmid: 17507006
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2004 Sep;49(2):85-117
references.pmid: 15304368
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1980 Jun;7(2):337-52
references.pmid: 7410498
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):867-75
references.pmid: 16334058
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1147-59
references.pmid: 16532850
references.citation: Infancy. 2001 Jan;2(1):29-49
references.pmid: 33451225
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):905-12
references.pmid: 17100792
references.citation: J Child Lang. 1989 Feb;16(1):161-79
references.pmid: 2647777
references.citation: J Child Lang. 2001 Jun;28(2):453-96
references.pmid: 11449947
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Mar;78(3):B53-64
references.pmid: 11124355
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):756-66
references.pmid: 9627414
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2003 Jun;6(2):131-6
references.pmid: 12728358
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Sep;22(5):1166-83
references.pmid: 8926483
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Apr;13(2):262-8
references.pmid: 16892992
references.citation: Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8
references.pmid: 8943209
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):915-30
references.pmid: 1402716
references.citation: Lang Speech. 2003;46(Pt 2-3):217-43
references.pmid: 14748445
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 Jan;8(1):26-35
references.pmid: 15647064
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1995;46:467-92
references.pmid: 7872735