title: Mechanisms of noise robust representation of speech in primary auditory cortex.
abstract: Humans and animals can reliably perceive behaviorally relevant sounds in noisy and reverberant environments, yet the neural mechanisms behind this phenomenon are largely unknown. To understand how neural circuits represent degraded auditory stimuli with additive and reverberant distortions, we compared single-neuron responses in ferret primary auditory cortex to speech and vocalizations in four conditions: clean, additive white and pink (1/f) noise, and reverberation. Despite substantial distortion, responses of neurons to the vocalization signal remained stable, maintaining the same statistical distribution in all conditions. Stimulus spectrograms reconstructed from population responses to the distorted stimuli resembled more the original clean than the distorted signals. To explore mechanisms contributing to this robustness, we simulated neural responses using several spectrotemporal receptive field models that incorporated either a static nonlinearity or subtractive synaptic depression and multiplicative gain normalization. The static model failed to suppress the distortions. A dynamic model incorporating feed-forward synaptic depression could account for the reduction of additive noise, but only the combined model with feedback gain normalization was able to predict the effects across both additive and reverberant conditions. Thus, both mechanisms can contribute to the abilities of humans and animals to extract relevant sounds in diverse noisy environments.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
authors.forename: Nima
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Mesgarani
authors.forename: Stephen V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: David
authors.forename: Jonathan B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Fritz
authors.forename: Shihab A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Shamma
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000818:Animals; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005289:Ferrets / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D009622:Noise; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
keywords: cortical; hearing; phonemes; population code
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3329-39
references.pmid: 19759321
references.citation: Neuron. 2011 Jun 23;70(6):1178-91
references.pmid: 21689603
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Aug 29;382(6594):807-10
references.pmid: 8752273
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):899-909
references.pmid: 18247893
references.citation: Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):220-4
references.pmid: 8985017
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002942
references.pmid: 23505354
references.citation: Science. 2014 Feb 28;343(6174):1006-10
references.pmid: 24482117
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 18;29(11):3374-86
references.pmid: 19295144
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 Feb 12;61(3):467-80
references.pmid: 19217382
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Dec;10(12):1601-7
references.pmid: 17994016
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):719-23
references.pmid: 9012851
references.citation: Network. 2001 Aug;12(3):289-316
references.pmid: 11563531
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2013 Nov;11(11):e1001710
references.pmid: 24265596
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8621-44
references.pmid: 9334433
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jan;91(1):215-32
references.pmid: 1737873
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):604-12
references.pmid: 14762146
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Jan 14;397(6715):154-7
references.pmid: 9923676
references.citation: Science. 1991 Jun 28;252(5014):1854-7
references.pmid: 2063199
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2006 Apr;20(2):111-36
references.pmid: 16518572
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1981;39(3):195-209
references.pmid: 6972785
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(5):1476-88
references.pmid: 22090462
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 11;6(1):e16104
references.pmid: 21264310
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Jul 18;4(7):e1000119
references.pmid: 18636100
references.citation: Nature. 2012 May 10;485(7397):233-6
references.pmid: 22522927
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Oct;52(5):1230-40
references.pmid: 19380604
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2008 Aug;122(3):235-51
references.pmid: 18729652
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):603-8
references.pmid: 18425123
references.citation: Hear Res. 2011 Sep;279(1-2):131-9
references.pmid: 21586317
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1997 May 6;8(7):1779-83
references.pmid: 9189932
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Aug;19(4):402-7
references.pmid: 19665367