title: Surgical treatment of thoracic disc herniations using a modified transfacet approach.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ideal surgical treatment for thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is controversial due to variations in patient presentation, pathology, and possible surgical approach. Althougth discectomy may lead to improvements in neurologic function, it can be complicated by approach related morbidity. Various posterior surgical approaches have been developed to treate TDH, but the gold standard remains transthoracic decompression. Certain patients have comorbidities and herniation that are not optimally treated with an anterior approach. A transfacet pedicle approach was first described in 1995, but outcomes and complications have not been well described. The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical effect and complications in a consecutive series of patients with symptomatic thoracic disc herniations undergoing thoracic discectomy using a modified transfacet approach.
  
  
  METHODS
  33 patients with thoracic disc herniation were included in this study. Duration of the disease was from 12 days to 36 months, with less than 1 month in 13 patients. Of these, 15 patients were diagnosed with simple thoracic disc herniation, 6 were associated with ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, and 12 with ossified or hypertrophied yellow ligament. A total of 45 discs were involved. All the herniated discs and the ossified posterior longitudinal ligaments were excised using a modified transfacet approach. Laminectomy and replantation were performed for patients with ossified or hypertrophied yellow ligament. The screw-rod system was used on both sides in 14 patients and on one side in l9 patients.
  
  
  RESULTS
  29 patients were followed up for an average of 37 months (range 12-63 months) and 4 patients were lost to followup. Evaluation was based on Epstein and Schwall criteria.5 15 were classified as excellent and 10 as good, accounting for 86.21% (25/29); 2 patients were classified as improved and 2 as poor. All the patients recovered neurologically after surgery. A total of 25 patients had significantly improved motor function from 3 to 6 months after surgery and 10 patients had slow recovery 6 months after surgery.. Of the three patients with postoperative complications, two had exacerbated preexisting defects and one had implant failure. Postoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging showed that all patients had well fused replanted lamina and completely decompressed canal.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Thoracic discectomy using a modified transfacet approach can significantly improve the clinical outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Shandong University, Ji'nan, Jimo people's Hospital, Qing'dao, China ; Department of Orthopaedics, Jimo people's Hospital, Qing'dao, China.
authors.forename: Xizhong
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Ji'nan, China.
authors.forename: Xinyu
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Ji'nan, China.
authors.forename: Yanping
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zheng
keywords: Discectomy; intervertebral disc herniation; spinal stenosis; thoracic vertebrae; transfacet approach
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 1998 Jun;49(6):599-606; discussion 606-8
references.pmid: 9637619
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1995 Dec;83(6):971-6
references.pmid: 7490640
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Mar;16(3):264-79
references.pmid: 22176427
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 15;38(6):523-30
references.pmid: 22986841
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Nov 1;19(21):2461-6
references.pmid: 7846602
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971 Feb;34(1):68-77
references.pmid: 5551695
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):1199-208
references.pmid: 18469693
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 1985 Apr;23(4):356-61
references.pmid: 3975822
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Mar;87(3):356-60
references.pmid: 15773646
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1960 May;17:418-30
references.pmid: 13794536
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 1983 Mar;12(3):303-5
references.pmid: 6843801
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):79-88
references.pmid: 20065866
references.citation: Mt Sinai J Med. 1993 Sep;60(4):321-6
references.pmid: 8232379
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1978 May;48(5):768-72
references.pmid: 641556
references.citation: J Neurosurg Sci. 2008 Sep;52(3):83-5
references.pmid: 18636053
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):E157-60
references.pmid: 15083003
references.citation: Spinal Cord. 1996 Jun;34(6):333-7
references.pmid: 8963986
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):E635-9
references.pmid: 18090072
references.citation: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;116(1):49-52
references.pmid: 1615769
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 1;34(10):E359-62
references.pmid: 19404165
references.citation: Spinal Cord. 1997 Mar;35(3):183-6
references.pmid: 9076872