title: Gray and green revisited: a multidisciplinary perspective of gardens, gardening, and the aging process.
abstract: Over fourteen years ago, the concept of "gray and green" was first introduced by Wright and Lund (2000) to represent a new awareness and a call for increased scholarship at the intersection of environmental issues and the aging process. This review paper revisits that concept with a fresh perspective on the specific role of gardens and gardening in the aging experience. As example, gardening is one of the most popular home-based leisure activities in the US and represents an important activity in the lives of older adults in a variety of residential settings. Yet, there has been a lack of any comprehensive and multidisciplinary (science and humanities) examination of the nexus between gardening and the aging experience, and in particular with research connections to stewardship and caring. In this paper, we review contemporary articles demonstrating the multidisciplinarity of gardening and the aging process. First, we will focus on the beneficial psychological effects resulting from the cultivation of caring, including personal contentment and artistic expression. Second, we will focus on stewardship and how gardening increases health, community awareness, and a connection to future generations. On the surface, this may demonstrate a separation between the humanities and science, but we will clarify a symbiotic relationship between the two disciplines in our conclusion.
authors.affiliation: Gerontology Interdisciplinary Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5880, USA.
authors.forename: Scott D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.affiliation: Family and Consumer Studies Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
authors.forename: Amy Maida
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Wadsworth
references.citation: J Gerontol Nurs. 2004 Oct;30(10):34-42
references.pmid: 15515443
references.citation: Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):303-20
references.pmid: 19196369
references.citation: J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34(1):325-38
references.pmid: 23207487
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Dec;107(3):974-80
references.pmid: 19235426
references.citation: J Aging Health. 2008 Aug;20(5):504-25
references.pmid: 18436856
references.citation: Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 May-Jun;48(3):340-5
references.pmid: 18423909
references.citation: J Aging Res. 2013;2013:324624
references.pmid: 23431446
references.citation: J Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;16(1):3-11
references.pmid: 20522508
references.citation: Am Demogr. 2002 Nov;24(10):40-1
references.pmid: 12425328
references.citation: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 May;23(5):485-9
references.pmid: 17918774
references.citation: Psychiatry Investig. 2012 Jun;9(2):100-10
references.pmid: 22707959
references.citation: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;20(8):796-7
references.pmid: 16035132
references.citation: J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(1):20-39
references.pmid: 10754796
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2010 Apr;19(7-8):949-58
references.pmid: 20492039
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(9):1781-93
references.pmid: 14990378
references.citation: HERD. 2013 Winter;6(2):27-42
references.pmid: 23532694
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;124(12):1764-9
references.pmid: 17159037
references.citation: Geriatr Nurs. 1997 Mar-Apr;18(2):53-6
references.pmid: 9119272
references.citation: Aging Ment Health. 2008 May;12(3):302-9
references.pmid: 18728942
references.citation: J Aging Phys Act. 2012 Jan;20(1):15-31
references.pmid: 22190117
references.citation: J Aging Health. 2011 Apr;23(3):433-53
references.pmid: 20858911
references.citation: Gerontology. 2009;55(1):64-72
references.pmid: 18566534