title: Hyaluronic acid hydrogel stiffness and oxygen tension affect cancer cell fate and endothelial sprouting.
abstract: Three-dimensional (3D) tissue culture models may recapitulate aspects of the tumorigenic microenvironmentin vivo, enabling the study of cancer progressionin vitro. Both hypoxia and matrix stiffness are known to regulate tumor growth. Using a modular culture system employing an acrylated hyaluronic acid (AHA) hydrogel, three hydrogel matrices with distinctive degrees of viscoelasticity - soft (78±16 Pa), medium (309± 57 Pa), and stiff (596± 73 Pa) - were generated using the same concentration of adhesion ligands. Oxygen levels within the hydrogel in atmospheric (21 %), hypoxic (5 %), and severely hypoxic (1 %) conditions were assessed with a mathematical model. HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells, encapsulated within the AHA hydrogels in high densities, generated nonuniform oxygen distributions, while lower cell densities resulted in more uniform oxygen distributions in the atmospheric and hypoxic environments. When we examined how varying viscoelasticity in atmospheric and hypoxic environments affects cell cycles and the expression ofBNIP3andBNIP3L(autophagy and apoptosis genes), andGLUT-1(a glucose transport gene), we observed that HT1080 cells in 3D hydrogel adapted better to hypoxic conditions than those in a Petri dish, with no obvious correlation to matrix viscoelasticity, by recovering rapidly from possible autophagy/apoptotic events and alternating metabolism mechanisms. Further, we examined how HT1080 cells cultured in varying viscoelasticity and oxygen tension conditions affected endothelial sprouting and invasion. We observed that increased matrix stiffness reduced endothelial sprouting and invasion in atmospheric conditions; however, we observed increased endothelial sprouting and invasion under hypoxia at all levels of matrix stiffness with the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoeitin-1 (ANG-1). Overall, HT1080 cells encapsulated in the AHA hydrogels under hypoxic stress recovered better from apoptosis and demonstrated greater angiogenic induction. Thus, we propose that oxygen tension more profoundly influences cell fate and the angiogenic potential of 3D cultured HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells than does matrix stiffness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
authors.forename: Yu-I
authors.initials: YI
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
authors.forename: Hasan E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Abaci
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
authors.forename: Yoni
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Krupsi
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
authors.forename: Lien-Chun
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Weng
authors.affiliation: Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
authors.forename: Jason A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Burdick
authors.affiliation: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
authors.forename: Sharon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gerecht
references.citation: Stem Cells. 2001;19(4):279-86
references.pmid: 11463947
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Jul;16(7):2147-52
references.pmid: 20214471
references.citation: Am J Pathol. 2000 May;156(5):1673-83
references.pmid: 10793078
references.citation: Cell. 2007 Aug 24;130(4):601-10
references.pmid: 17719539
references.citation: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2007 Feb;17(1):71-7
references.pmid: 17208433
references.citation: Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Apr;9(4):239-52
references.pmid: 19279573
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 1;72(3):726-35
references.pmid: 22298596
references.citation: Cell. 2006 Aug 25;126(4):677-89
references.pmid: 16923388
references.citation: J Mol Med (Berl). 2009 Jun;87(6):549-60
references.pmid: 19288062
references.citation: Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug;2(8):563-72
references.pmid: 12154349
references.citation: J Mol Med (Berl). 1998 May;76(6):391-401
references.pmid: 9625296
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 15;72(22):6013-23
references.pmid: 22952217
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 18;310(5751):1139-43
references.pmid: 16293750
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2009 Oct;30(30):6076-85
references.pmid: 19695694
references.citation: Hepatology. 2011 Apr;53(4):1192-205
references.pmid: 21442631
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2010 Nov;31(33):8596-607
references.pmid: 20727585
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 1;72(23):6089-96
references.pmid: 23172313
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2008 Apr 18;283(16):10892-903
references.pmid: 18281291
references.citation: Blood. 2005 Jan 15;105(2):659-69
references.pmid: 15374877
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Apr;9(4):285-96
references.pmid: 18285802
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):10334-9
references.pmid: 22689955
references.citation: Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 May;17(9-10):1351-61
references.pmid: 21247340
references.citation: FASEB J. 1992 Apr;6(7):2439-49
references.pmid: 1348714
references.citation: Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2007 Dec;81(4):270-85
references.pmid: 18228260
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 20;270(3):1230-7
references.pmid: 7836384
references.citation: Nat Med. 2000 Jan;6(1):100-2
references.pmid: 10613833
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2011 Nov;32(31):7905-12
references.pmid: 21782234
references.citation: Biochem Soc Trans. 2007 Nov;35(Pt 5):849-52
references.pmid: 17956230
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2007 Oct;4(10):855-60
references.pmid: 17767164
references.citation: Nat Med. 1995 Feb;1(2):149-53
references.pmid: 7585012
references.citation: Blood. 2011 Jul 21;118(3):804-15
references.pmid: 21527523
references.citation: J Cell Mol Med. 2010 Oct;14(10):2436-47
references.pmid: 19968735
references.citation: Exp Cell Res. 2004 Jul 15;297(2):574-84
references.pmid: 15212957
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2009;4(12):1888-98
references.pmid: 20010936
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2010 Jul;31(20):5472-8
references.pmid: 20398926
references.citation: Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74
references.pmid: 10197347
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2007 Feb;28(4):671-9
references.pmid: 17049594
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010 Jun;298(6):C1527-37
references.pmid: 20181925
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2012 Sep;33(26):6123-31
references.pmid: 22672833
references.citation: J Cell Commun Signal. 2011 Aug;5(3):239-48
references.pmid: 21499821
references.citation: Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3017-27
references.pmid: 23151342
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 2010 Mar 2;102(5):789-95
references.pmid: 20104230
references.citation: Circ Res. 2003 Oct 3;93(7):664-73
references.pmid: 12958144
references.citation: Radiol Clin North Am. 2002 Sep;40(5):991-1011
references.pmid: 12462465
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011 Aug;301(2):C431-40
references.pmid: 21543738