title: Information for coarticulation: Static signal properties or formant dynamics?
abstract: Perception of a speech segment changes depending on properties of surrounding segments in a phenomenon called compensation for coarticulation (Mann, 1980). The nature of information that drives these perceptual changes is a matter of debate. One account attributes perceptual shifts to low-level auditory system contrast effects based on static portions of the signal (e.g., third formant [F3] center or average frequency; Lotto & Kluender, 1998). An alternative account is that listeners' perceptual shifts result from listeners attuning to the acoustic effects of gestural overlap and that this information for coarticulation is necessarily dynamic (Fowler, 2006). In a pair of experiments, we used sinewave speech precursors to investigate the nature of information for compensation for coarticulation. In Experiment 1, as expected by both accounts, we found that sinewave speech precursors produce shifts in following segments. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether effects in Experiment 1 were driven by static F3 offsets of sinewave speech precursors, or by dynamic relationships among their formants. We temporally reversed F1 and F2 in sinewave precursors, preserving static F3 offset and average F1, F2 and F3 frequencies, but disrupting dynamic formant relationships. Despite having identical F3s, selectively reversed precursors produced effects that were significantly smaller and restricted to only a small portion of the continuum. We conclude that dynamic formant relations rather than static properties of the precursor provide information for compensation for coarticulation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, State University of New York.
authors.forename: Navin
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Viswanathan
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The University of Connecticut.
authors.forename: James S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Magnuson
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The University of Connecticut.
authors.forename: Carol A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Fowler
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D005868:Gestures; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D010700:Phonetics; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013067:Speech Perception; D014796:Visual Perception; D014833:Voice Quality; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Feb;16(1):74-9
references.pmid: 19145013
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):2173-8
references.pmid: 21973371
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(3):581-9
references.pmid: 23883307
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):305-12
references.pmid: 15828978
references.citation: Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):1-36
references.pmid: 4075760
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 May;73(5):1751-5
references.pmid: 6863754
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Aug;102(2 Pt 1):1134-40
references.pmid: 9265760
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Jun;26(3):877-88
references.pmid: 10883999
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Aug;50(2):637-55
references.pmid: 4106390
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 May;60(4):602-19
references.pmid: 9628993
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Nov;120(5 Pt 1):2801-17
references.pmid: 17091133
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1980 Nov;28(5):407-12
references.pmid: 7208250
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1227-40
references.pmid: 17355045
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1980 Sep;28(3):213-28
references.pmid: 7432999
references.citation: Science. 1981 May 22;212(4497):947-9
references.pmid: 7233191
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):1181-92
references.pmid: 23148469
references.citation: J Phon. 2010 Jul 1;38(3):375-387
references.pmid: 20871808
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:149-79
references.pmid: 14744213
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2006 Feb;68(2):161-77
references.pmid: 16773890
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):1005-15
references.pmid: 20695714
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1990 Dec;48(6):559-70
references.pmid: 2270188
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2006 Feb;68(2):178-83
references.pmid: 16773891
references.citation: Phonetica. 2000 Apr-Dec;57(2-4):170-80
references.pmid: 10992137
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):2021-32
references.pmid: 20968373
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Aug;108(2):710-22
references.pmid: 10955638