title: Adverse moisture events predict seasonal abundance of Lyme disease vector ticks (Ixodes scapularis).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most commonly reported vector-borne disease in north temperate regions worldwide, affecting an estimated 300,000 people annually in the United States alone. The incidence of LB is correlated with human exposure to its vector, the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis). To date, attempts to model tick encounter risk based on environmental parameters have been equivocal. Previous studies have not considered (1) the differences between relative humidity (RH) in leaf litter and at weather stations, (2) the RH threshold that affects nymphal blacklegged tick survival, and (3) the time required below the threshold to induce mortality. We clarify the association between environmental moisture and tick survival by presenting a significant relationship between the total number of tick adverse moisture events (TAMEs - calculated as microclimatic periods below a RH threshold) and tick abundance each year.
  
  
  METHODS
  We used a 14-year continuous statewide tick surveillance database and corresponding weather data from Rhode Island (RI), USA, to assess the effects of TAMEs on nymphal populations of I. scapularis. These TAMEs were defined as extended periods of time (>8 h below 82% RH in leaf litter). We fit a sigmoid curve comparing weather station data to those collected by loggers placed in tick habitats to estimate RH experienced by nymphal ticks, and compiled the number of historical TAMEs during the 14-year record.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total number of TAMEs in June of each year was negatively related to total seasonal nymphal tick densities, suggesting that sub-threshold humidity episodes >8 h in duration naturally lowered nymphal blacklegged tick abundance. Furthermore, TAMEs were positively related to the ratio of tick abundance early in the season when compared to late season, suggesting that lower than average tick abundance for a given year resulted from tick mortality and not from other factors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results clarify the mechanism by which environmental moisture affects blacklegged tick populations, and offers the possibility to more accurately predict tick abundance and human LB incidence. We describe a method to forecast LB risk in endemic regions and identify the predictive role of microclimatic moisture conditions on tick encounter risk.
authors.affiliation: Center for Vector-Borne Disease, University of Rhode Island, 02881 Kingston, RI, USA. kaberger@ucalgary.ca.
authors.forename: Kathryn A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Berger
authors.forename: Howard S
authors.initials: HS
authors.lastname: Ginsberg
authors.forename: Katherine D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Dugas
authors.forename: Lutz H
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: Hamel
authors.forename: Thomas N
authors.initials: TN
authors.lastname: Mather
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001096:Arachnid Vectors / Q000382:microbiology*; D018884:Ixodes / Q000502:physiology*; D008193:Lyme Disease / Q000635:transmission*; D009758:Nymph; D011156:Population Density; D011891:Rain; D012621:Seasons
references.citation: Parasitol Res. 2000 Jul;86(7):554-7
references.pmid: 10935905
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2007 Mar;44(2):372-5
references.pmid: 17427711
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1998 Nov;35(6):1025-8
references.pmid: 9835697
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e145
references.pmid: 16669698
references.citation: Exp Appl Acarol. 1999 Dec;23(12):977-86
references.pmid: 10737732
references.citation: Science. 1998 Jul 17;281(5375):349-50
references.pmid: 9705710
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Mar 15;157(6):531-8
references.pmid: 12631543
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 1991;36:659-81
references.pmid: 2006871
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2007 Sep;44(5):898-900
references.pmid: 17915524
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2000 May;37(3):357-63
references.pmid: 15535578
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec 1;144(11):1066-9
references.pmid: 8942438
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1996 Sep;33(5):711-20
references.pmid: 8840676
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1993 Jan;30(1):144-50
references.pmid: 8433321
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1994 Mar;31(2):310-4
references.pmid: 8189424
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2000 May;37(3):408-15
references.pmid: 15535585
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 1988 Jul;25(4):224-8
references.pmid: 3404540
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 2002 Jul;32(8):979-89
references.pmid: 12076627
references.citation: Science. 1998 Feb 13;279(5353):1023-6
references.pmid: 9461433
references.citation: Int J Med Microbiol. 2004 Apr;293 Suppl 37:55-62
references.pmid: 15146985
references.citation: J Med Entomol. 2009 Sep;46(5):1025-9
references.pmid: 19769032
references.citation: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004 Summer;4(2):143-8
references.pmid: 15228815