title: Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Prostate cancer poses many challenges for both the man and his partner. Partners have reported a range of issues that impact their own mental health following their partner's diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically evaluate the current literature reporting psychosocial intervention studies for partners of prostate cancer patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  An extensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted (OvidMEDLINE 1946, 26th September 2013, and psychINFO 1967, 26th September 2013) using the keywords prostate cancer AND intervention* OR therapy* OR psychosocial intervention* OR support* AND couple* or Spouse* or Partner* or Intimate partner* matched to the title as well as secondary scanning of reference lists. Studies were included if they described interventions for partners of prostate cancer patients, either solely for the partners or as a couple, intended to alleviate distress and enhance the partner's or couple's quality of life, and reported a measurable outcome for partners.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 11 prostate cancer-specific intervention studies that included partners and reported separate results for the partners were found. Only one of these interventions was partner specific, the other eight involved the patient-partner dyad. The studies identified primarily focussed on two areas: emotional distress and sexual intimacy, and mixed findings were reported for efficacy of interventions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite strong evidence that partners of men with prostate cancer experience difficulties associated with the impact of prostate cancer, there is limited research that has investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partners. Of the reviewed studies, it is evident that interventions targeting the reduction of emotional distress, improved communication and sexual intimacy between the couple and utilisation of strategies that enable partners to express their distress, learn new strategies and implement behavioural change show the most promising results in enhancing partner well-being.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Significant progress is required in developing and evaluating appropriate and effective psychosocial support interventions for partners of prostate cancer survivors as partners appear to have significant unmet needs in this area.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 3 Centre, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia, addie.wootten@mh.org.au.
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Wootten
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Abbott
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Farrell
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Austin
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Klein
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology*; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D018454:Spouses / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: Cancer. 2005 Dec 15;104(12):2689-700
references.pmid: 16294343
references.citation: Cancer Invest. 2006 Mar;24(2):192-8
references.pmid: 16537189
references.citation: Urology. 1998 Jun;51(6):991-7
references.pmid: 9609638
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2002 May;21(3):288-93
references.pmid: 12027035
references.citation: Urol Nurs. 2007 Feb;27(1):65-77; discussion 78-80
references.pmid: 17390930
references.citation: Urology. 1999 Jan;53(1):180-6
references.pmid: 9886609
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 2011 Aug;20(6):833-44
references.pmid: 21170682
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2006 Nov;15(11):937-53
references.pmid: 16521081
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1989 Apr;29(2):159-65
references.pmid: 2753377
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Apr;53(1):57-64
references.pmid: 15062905
references.citation: J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):587-92
references.pmid: 11458073
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):1197-209
references.pmid: 21210958
references.citation: J Behav Med. 1997 Aug;20(4):333-49
references.pmid: 9298433
references.citation: Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2 Suppl):414-24
references.pmid: 17173280
references.citation: Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2809-18
references.pmid: 17999405
references.citation: BMC Cancer. 2008 Jul 24;8:207
references.pmid: 18651985
references.citation: Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Mar;34(2):227-31
references.pmid: 23220254
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 2001 Mar;50(3):226-31
references.pmid: 11252211
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):465-9
references.pmid: 21990204
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2004 Jan;13(1):37-46
references.pmid: 14745744
references.citation: Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Aug;10(4):503-8
references.pmid: 16927903
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(11):1517-24
references.pmid: 12855257
references.citation: Urol Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):140-7
references.pmid: 23930447
references.citation: J Behav Med. 2014 Oct;37(5):931-54
references.pmid: 24488543
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Mar 08;11:19
references.pmid: 20211019
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2000 Jan-Feb;9(1):44-56
references.pmid: 10668059
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):179-85
references.pmid: 15288912
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2003 Jul-Aug;12(5):463-73
references.pmid: 12833559
references.citation: Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3403-9
references.pmid: 23934226
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1217-27
references.pmid: 18164111
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2009 Jul;18(7):735-46
references.pmid: 19061199
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):482-92
references.pmid: 19816159
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2006 Oct 16;185(8):428-32
references.pmid: 17137432
references.citation: Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011 Nov;27(4):300-8
references.pmid: 22018409