title: Density drives polyandry and relatedness influences paternal success in the Pacific gooseneck barnacle, Pollicipes elegans.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Polyandry is a common mating strategy in animals, increasing female fitness through direct (material) and indirect (genetic) benefits. Most theories about the benefits of polyandry come from studies of terrestrial animals, which have relatively complex mating systems and behaviors; less is known about the potential benefits of polyandry in sessile marine animals, for which potential mates may be scarce and females have less control over pre-copulatory mate choice. Here, we used microsatellite markers to examine multiple paternity in natural aggregations of the Pacific gooseneck barnacle Pollicipes elegans, testing the effect of density on paternity and mate relatedness on male reproductive success.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that multiple paternity was very common (79% of broods), with up to five fathers contributing to a brood, though power was relatively low to detect more than four fathers. Density had a significant and positive linear effect on the number of fathers siring a brood, though this relationship leveled off at high numbers of fathers, which may reflect a lack of power and/or an upper limit to polyandry in this species. Significant skew in male reproductive contribution in multiply-sired broods was observed and we found a positive and significant relationship between the proportion of offspring sired and the genetic similarity between mates, suggesting that genetic compatibility may influence reproductive success in this species.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To our knowledge, this is the first study to show high levels of multiple paternity in a barnacle, and overall, patterns of paternity in P. elegans appear to be driven primarily by mate availability. Evidence of paternity bias for males with higher relatedness suggests some form of post-copulatory sexual selection is taking place, but more work is needed to determine whether it operates during or post-fertilization. Overall, our results suggest that while polyandry in P. elegans is driven by mate availability, it may also provide a mechanism for females to ensure fertilization by compatible gametes and increase reproductive success in this sessile species.
authors.affiliation: Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P,O, Box 775, Cambridge, MD 21601, USA. lplough@umces.edu.
authors.forename: Louis V
authors.initials: LV
authors.lastname: Plough
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Moran
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Marko
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D001468:Thoracica / Q000235:genetics*
references.citation: Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):258-275
references.pmid: 28568555
references.citation: Evolution. 1987 Mar;41(2):372-384
references.pmid: 28568748
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 12;108(28):11512-7
references.pmid: 21709247
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Nov;174(5):741-52
references.pmid: 19772439
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 3;415(6867):71-3
references.pmid: 11780118
references.citation: Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2832-8
references.pmid: 17908250
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
references.pmid: 22820204
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 16;280(1754):20122919
references.pmid: 23325777
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):52-8
references.pmid: 21238200
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2002 Oct;11(10):2115-22
references.pmid: 12296953
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(5):1517-25
references.pmid: 15813789
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Nov;8(6):1263-6
references.pmid: 21586016
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
references.pmid: 10740892
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jun;14(7):2169-79
references.pmid: 15910335
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):526-8
references.pmid: 17638673
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2006 Aug;46(4):398-406
references.pmid: 21672752
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 May 7;275(1638):1081-7
references.pmid: 18252665
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jun 1;13(6):246-50
references.pmid: 21238286
references.citation: Genetics. 1999 Jul;152(3):1057-63
references.pmid: 10388824
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Jul;62(7):1653-65
references.pmid: 18315573
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Feb;59(2):317-23
references.pmid: 15807418
references.citation: J Hered. 2014 Jan-Feb;105(1):136-42
references.pmid: 24115106
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2005 May;18(3):735-41
references.pmid: 15842502
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jan;14(1):19-38
references.pmid: 15643948
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2371-5
references.pmid: 14667353
references.citation: Hum Hered. 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):45-52
references.pmid: 8514326
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9;17(1):32-6
references.pmid: 17208183
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6347
references.pmid: 19672289
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2009 Aug;18(15):3307-15
references.pmid: 19508451
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1948 Dec;2(Pt. 3):349-68
references.pmid: 18103134
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 7;267(1448):1107-13
references.pmid: 10885515
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Nov;15(13):4193-202
references.pmid: 17054512
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Aug;16(15):3253-62
references.pmid: 17651201
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Jan;11(1):141-5
references.pmid: 21429111
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7
references.pmid: 21565059
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 22;279(1739):2855-61
references.pmid: 22438495
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 31;96(18):10236-41
references.pmid: 10468592
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43234
references.pmid: 22937024
references.citation: Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1726-1730
references.pmid: 28565303
references.citation: Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1753-66
references.pmid: 10430599
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Sep;15(10):3009-21
references.pmid: 16911217
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Dec 22;3(6):685-8
references.pmid: 17911048
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):9916-8
references.pmid: 12097648
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Oct;21(20):5088-97
references.pmid: 22967221
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):145-164
references.pmid: 10973716
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 Jun;10(6):1539-49
references.pmid: 11412374
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 26;96(22):12632-7
references.pmid: 10535974
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2495-501
references.pmid: 21227973
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 Mar 1;64(3):785-97
references.pmid: 19796148
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Dec 22;254(1341):173-9
references.pmid: 8108451
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1198-202
references.pmid: 12082138
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 22;275(1637):971-8
references.pmid: 18230591