title: A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
abstract: Identifying stakeholder beliefs and attitudes is critical for resolving management conflicts. Debate over outdoor cat management is often described as a conflict between two groups, environmental advocates and animal welfare advocates, but little is known about the variables predicting differences among these critical stakeholder groups. We administered a mail survey to randomly selected stakeholders representing both of these groups (n=1,596) in Florida, where contention over the management of outdoor cats has been widespread. We used a structural equation model to evaluate stakeholder intention to support non-lethal management. The cognitive hierarchy model predicted that values influenced beliefs, which predicted general and specific attitudes, which in turn, influenced behavioral intentions. We posited that specific attitudes would mediate the effect of general attitudes, beliefs, and values on management support. Model fit statistics suggested that the final model fit the data well (CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.062). The final model explained 74% of the variance in management support, and positive attitudes toward lethal management (humaneness) had the largest direct effect on management support. Specific attitudes toward lethal management and general attitudes toward outdoor cats mediated the relationship between positive (p<0.05) and negative cat-related impact beliefs (p<0.05) and support for management. These results supported the specificity hypothesis and the use of the cognitive hierarchy to assess stakeholder intention to support non-lethal cat management. Our findings suggest that stakeholders can simultaneously perceive both positive and negative beliefs about outdoor cats, which influence attitudes toward and support for non-lethal management.
authors.affiliation: Center for Policy Informatics, School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America.
authors.forename: Dara M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wald
authors.affiliation: Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
authors.forename: Susan K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Jacobson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001290:Attitude; D002415:Cats; D003469:Culture; D004777:Environment; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Jun 1;220(11):1627-33
references.pmid: 12051500
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 Nov 1;225(9):1354-60
references.pmid: 15552308
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2012 Apr;26(2):345-56
references.pmid: 22443133
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Apr 15;232(8):1159-67
references.pmid: 18412526
references.citation: Aust Vet J. 2002 Sep;80(9):536-43
references.pmid: 12398314
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2013 Jun;33(6):1049-65
references.pmid: 23278120
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1994 Aug;49(8):709-24
references.pmid: 8092614
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):27-35
references.pmid: 18254850
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44616
references.pmid: 22970269
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91
references.pmid: 18697684
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 2010 Aug 6;45(4):627-60
references.pmid: 26735713
references.citation: Risk Anal. 1994 Dec;14(6):1085-96
references.pmid: 7846317
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2009 Aug;23(4):887-94
references.pmid: 19245489
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2008 Apr 17;84(1-2):27-47
references.pmid: 18055046