title: Land usage attributed to corn ethanol production in the United States: sensitivity to technological advances in corn grain yield, ethanol conversion, and co-product utilization.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although the system for producing yellow corn grain is well established in the US, its role among other biofeedstock alternatives to petroleum-based energy sources has to be balanced with its predominant purpose for food and feed as well as economics, land use, and environmental stewardship. We model land usage attributed to corn ethanol production in the US to evaluate the effects of anticipated technological change in corn grain production, ethanol processing, and livestock feeding through a multi-disciplinary approach. Seven scenarios are evaluated: four considering the impact of technological advances on corn grain production, two focused on improved efficiencies in ethanol processing, and one reflecting greater use of ethanol co-products (that is, distillers dried grains with solubles) in diets for dairy cattle, pigs, and poultry. For each scenario, land area attributed to corn ethanol production is estimated for three time horizons: 2011 (current), the time period at which the 15 billion gallon cap for corn ethanol as per the Renewable Fuel Standard is achieved, and 2026 (15 years out).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Although 40.5% of corn grain was channeled to ethanol processing in 2011, only 25% of US corn acreage was attributable to ethanol when accounting for feed co-product utilization. By 2026, land area attributed to corn ethanol production is reduced to 11% to 19% depending on the corn grain yield level associated with the four corn production scenarios, considering oil replacement associated with the soybean meal substituted in livestock diets with distillers dried grains with solubles. Efficiencies in ethanol processing, although producing more ethanol per bushel of processed corn, result in less co-products and therefore less offset of corn acreage. Shifting the use of distillers dried grains with solubles in feed to dairy cattle, pigs, and poultry substantially reduces land area attributed to corn ethanol production. However, because distillers dried grains with solubles substitutes at a higher rate for soybean meal, oil replacement requirements intensify and positively feedback to elevate estimates of land usage.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Accounting for anticipated technological changes in the corn ethanol system is important for understanding the associated land base ascribed, and may aid in calibrating parameters for land use models in biofuel life-cycle analyses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
authors.forename: Rita H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Mumm
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
authors.forename: Peter D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Goldsmith
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
authors.forename: Kent D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Rausch
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
authors.forename: Hans H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Stein
keywords: Agricultural biotechnology; Corn ethanol; Corn ethanol co-products; Corn gluten feed; Corn gluten meal; Corn grain production; DDGS; Distillers dried grains with solubles; Livestock feeding; Technological change
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2006 Dec;84(12):3356-63
references.pmid: 17093228
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2010 Apr;88(4):1398-410
references.pmid: 19966160
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;45(1):334-9
references.pmid: 21142000
references.citation: Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):784-5
references.pmid: 20705847
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 May;38(5):617-26
references.pmid: 20714780
references.citation: Biotechnol Lett. 2010 Sep;32(9):1261-4
references.pmid: 20473631
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1292-303
references.pmid: 19028847
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004 Spring;113-116:937-49
references.pmid: 15054243
references.citation: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Apr 10;6(1):51
references.pmid: 23575438
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jul;147(3):969-77
references.pmid: 18612074
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2011 Feb;90(2):369-76
references.pmid: 21248334
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Oct;92(1):77-84
references.pmid: 21655987
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jun 5;46(11):6379-84
references.pmid: 22533454
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2004 Nov;83(11):1891-6
references.pmid: 15554067
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jan;93(1):288-303
references.pmid: 20059927
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2011 Sep;89(9):2801-11
references.pmid: 21454866
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):5802-13
references.pmid: 19923586
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2008 Aug;86(8):1819-31
references.pmid: 18375667
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8
references.pmid: 16439656