title: Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex correlates with objective clinical measures in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
abstract: METHODS
  Prospective cohort study.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the correlation between central motor conduction time (CMCT) and various subjective and objective clinical assessment measures in patients undergoing decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  CSM can cause a spectrum of neurological deficits among individuals. Subjective clinical assessments of disease severity may lack the sensitivity of objective tests. Transcranial magnetic stimulation provides objective electrophysiological data on the integrity of the corticospinal tracts, which may be useful for monitoring disease progression or neurological improvement after surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients undergoing surgical decompression for CSM underwent subjective and objective testing before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Subjective measures included modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, Nurick grade, and visual analogue scale score. Objective measures included CMCT as measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation, the 10-m walk test, the 9-hole peg task, and the grip and release test. Primary outcome was the correlation between CMCT and subjective or objective measures at preoperative and postoperative time points. Secondary outcome was the correlation between preoperative CMCT and performance in subjective or objective testing after surgical intervention.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Improvement in both subjective and objective measures was observed after surgery. CMCT correlated with other objective measures (10-m walk test, 9-hole peg task, and grip and release test) both at baseline and after decompressive surgery in these 17 patients with CSM. Patients with high baseline CMCTs were associated with poor performance on the 10-m walk test, 9-hole peg task, and grip and release test. Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score correlated with CMCT at baseline but not after surgical intervention. CMCT was not associated with other subjective measures, such as Neck Disability Index, Nurick grade, and visual analogue scale score, at preoperative or postoperative time points.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CMCT as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation is a responsive objective assessment of CSM. It can be used to monitor disease severity and neurological function before and after surgical intervention. Prolonged baseline CMCT may be associated with worse surgical outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  2.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
authors.forename: Marcus D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Mazur
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McEvoy
authors.forename: Erica F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Bisson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery*; D019299:Decompression, Surgical; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000503:physiopathology*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D055009:Spondylosis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Mar 15;22(6):636-40
references.pmid: 9089936
references.citation: World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr;81(3-4):623-33
references.pmid: 24056096
references.citation: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(3-4):127-35
references.pmid: 3354360
references.citation: Neurology. 1991 Jan;41(1):75-80
references.pmid: 1985298
references.citation: Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):645-9
references.pmid: 18586200
references.citation: Br J Neurosurg. 1990;4(3):187-92
references.pmid: 2397044
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 1;38(5):392-400
references.pmid: 23448898
references.citation: Eur J Neurol. 2005 Jan;12(1):55-63
references.pmid: 15613148
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD001466
references.pmid: 20091520
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):112-8
references.pmid: 19769490
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):238-44
references.pmid: 19769503
references.citation: Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106-7
references.pmid: 2860322
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 May 1;20(9):1004-10
references.pmid: 7631229
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1991 Sep;4(3):286-95
references.pmid: 1802159
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Sep;90(9):1210-3
references.pmid: 18757962
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;79(8):965-7
references.pmid: 18420728
references.citation: Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84
references.pmid: 1026900
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 May 15;29(10):1137-45
references.pmid: 15131444
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):82-6
references.pmid: 19127165
references.citation: Surg Neurol. 1985 Apr;23(4):350-5
references.pmid: 2983449
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Oct;85(5):311-20
references.pmid: 1385091
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S111-22
references.pmid: 23963009
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):E15-20
references.pmid: 18165736
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;112(6):1035-40
references.pmid: 11377262
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Mar;69(2):215-9
references.pmid: 3818752
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;119(3):504-532
references.pmid: 18063409
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2005 Dec;29(6):343-6
references.pmid: 16132989
references.citation: Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1077-9
references.pmid: 23562331
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;75(2):256-61
references.pmid: 14742600
references.citation: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15
references.pmid: 1834753
references.citation: Brain. 1972;95(1):101-8
references.pmid: 5023079
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 May;73(5):442-6
references.pmid: 1580771
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jan;82(1):9-13
references.pmid: 11239279
references.citation: Muscle Nerve. 1994 Feb;17(2):235-41
references.pmid: 8114794
references.citation: Br J Neurosurg. 1989;3(5):541-8
references.pmid: 2818847
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr;44(4):762-9; discussion 769-70
references.pmid: 10201301
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 1998 Sep 18;160(1):26-32
references.pmid: 9804113