title: Mechanical analysis of the roundhouse kick according to height and distance in taekwondo.
abstract: Competition regulation in taekwondo has experienced several changes during the last few years, for example, kicks to the head score more points than kicks to the chest. In addition, some external factors such as the height of target and execution distance seem to affect the kick performance. The aim of this study was to analyse selected biomechanical parameters (impact force, reaction time, and execution time) according to the height and execution distance in two different male groups (experts (n = 12) and novices (n = 21)). Athletes kicked twice from every execution distance (short, normal and long) and towards two different heights of target (chest and head) in a random order. Novices kicked to the head with a longer reaction time than to the chest (p < 0.05) but experts were able to kick with similar performance for both heights. From short and normal distances experts kicked with similar performance; whereas from the normal distance novices had longer reaction and execution time than from the short distance (p < 0.05). In conclusion, in counterattacking situations, experts should perform the roundhouse kick to the head instead of to the chest, because it produces better scores with similar performance; whereas novice athletes should avoid kicking to the head because they are not able to kick with similar performance. Moreover, it is recommended that during counterattacks higher-level taekwondo athletes should intend to kick from normal distances.
authors.affiliation: Universidad Católica de Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Spain.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Estevan
authors.affiliation: Universidad Católica de Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Spain.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Falco
keywords: Biomechanics; execution distance; height; kick; taekwondo combat
references.citation: J Biomech. 1991;24(10):951-60
references.pmid: 1744152
references.citation: J Hum Kinet. 2012 Mar;31:37-43
references.pmid: 23486074
references.citation: J Biomech. 2009 Feb 9;42(3):242-8
references.pmid: 19124126
references.citation: J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Nov 01;8(CSSI3):13-6
references.pmid: 24474880
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2002 Jul;21(2):213-30
references.pmid: 12167300
references.citation: Sports Biomech. 2010 Jun;9(2):98-114
references.pmid: 20806845
references.citation: Sports Biomech. 2013 Nov;12(4):381-8
references.pmid: 24466650
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2013;31(16):1815-22
references.pmid: 23879570
references.citation: Sports Biomech. 2008 Sep;7(3):361-71
references.pmid: 18972885
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):591-605
references.pmid: 17944619
references.citation: J Appl Biomech. 2007 May;23(2):139-48
references.pmid: 17603133
references.citation: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Oct;25(10):2851-6
references.pmid: 21912286
references.citation: J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Nov;12(6):614-21
references.pmid: 19054714
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2008 Jan 15;26(2):189-96
references.pmid: 17943591