title: Enfacing others but only if they are nice to you.
abstract: Experiencing tactile facial stimulation while seeing synchronous stimuli on the face of another individual induces "enfacement," i.e., the subjective illusory experience of ownership of the other's face (explicit measure) and the attribution of the others' facial features to one's own face (implicit measure). Here we expanded previous knowledge by investigating if the tendency to include the other into one's own representation is influenced by positive or negative interpersonal attitudes derived either from consolidated socio-cultural stereotypes or from newly acquired, short-term individual interactions with a specific person. To this aim, we tested in Caucasian white participants the enfacement with a white and a black confederate, before and after an experimental procedure inducing a positive or negative perception of each of them. The results show that the subjective experience of enfacement with in- and out-group others before and after the manipulation is similar. The bias in attributing other's facial features to one's own face after synchronous stroking was, instead, dependent on whether the other person was positively perceived, independently of his/her ethnicity. Thus, we show that realistic positive face-to-face interactions are more effective than consolidated racial biases in influencing the strength of self-attribution of another persons' facial features in the context of multisensory illusions. Results suggest that positive interpersonal interactions might powerfully change the plasticity of self-other representations.
authors.affiliation: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy ; Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Ilaria
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bufalari
authors.affiliation: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy ; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Bigna
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lenggenhager
authors.affiliation: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy ; Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Giuseppina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Porciello
authors.affiliation: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy ; Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Brittany
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Serra Holmes
authors.affiliation: IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia Rome, Italy ; Social and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Salvatore M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Aglioti
keywords: enfacement illusion; interpersonal perception; multisensory integration; racial bias; social cognition; stereotype
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(2):148-62
references.pmid: 19813138
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):13169-73
references.pmid: 18725630
references.citation: Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Nov 18;7:165
references.pmid: 24302900
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1242-56
references.pmid: 22658684
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Oct 03;2(10):e971
references.pmid: 17912350
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):373-80
references.pmid: 23347644
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80
references.pmid: 9654756
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1131-9
references.pmid: 19076485
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20195
references.pmid: 21633503
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Dec;13(12):524-31
references.pmid: 19896410
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):197-216
references.pmid: 12916565
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15387-92
references.pmid: 11742078
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2381-9
references.pmid: 19620109
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):779-87
references.pmid: 23727712
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 6;21(23):R945-6
references.pmid: 22153159
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):356-74
references.pmid: 20175618
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21659
references.pmid: 21738756
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e4040
references.pmid: 19107208
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 19;6(1):e16128
references.pmid: 21283823
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):703-12
references.pmid: 19819247
references.citation: Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jul 25;7:65
references.pmid: 23898244
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2007 Sep;16(3):583-99
references.pmid: 17533140
references.citation: Eur J Pain. 2011 Sep;15(8):874-9
references.pmid: 21570328
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):1018-22
references.pmid: 20537539
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21
references.pmid: 10637618
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1302-16
references.pmid: 18359642
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1997 Dec;20(12):560-4
references.pmid: 9416668
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1202-7
references.pmid: 20679523
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46809
references.pmid: 23071644
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):56-63
references.pmid: 15660852
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):466-9
references.pmid: 16421576
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2012 Dec;21(4):1725-38
references.pmid: 23123685
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50757
references.pmid: 23209824
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3832
references.pmid: 19050755
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50223
references.pmid: 23209680
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4930
references.pmid: 19293933
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52400
references.pmid: 23285026
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:575-604
references.pmid: 11752497
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Dec;34(12):3168-81
references.pmid: 22807311
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 26;7:393
references.pmid: 23898249
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Dec 16;5(12):e15268
references.pmid: 21179564
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9828-33
references.pmid: 17517605
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2003 Dec;12(4):717-31
references.pmid: 14656513
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Oct;3(10):1049-56
references.pmid: 11017179
references.citation: Science. 2007 Aug 24;317(5841):1096-9
references.pmid: 17717189
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96
references.pmid: 19338504
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40682
references.pmid: 22866177
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):343-52
references.pmid: 18164534
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):786-97
references.pmid: 22542636
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):711-47
references.pmid: 15367078
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Nov;32(11):1986-97
references.pmid: 20882581
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):173-179
references.pmid: 12691766
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):756
references.pmid: 9486643
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 30;110(31):12846-51
references.pmid: 23858436
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1994 Jul;116(1):21-7; discussion 28
references.pmid: 8078971