title: Changing ecosystem service values following technological change.
abstract: Research on ecosystem services has focused mostly on natural areas or remote places, with less attention given to urban ecosystem services and their relationship with technological change. However, recent work by urban ecologists and urban designers has more closely examined and appreciated the opportunities associated with integrating natural and built infrastructures. Nevertheless, a perception remains in the literature on ecosystem services that technology may easily and irreversibly substitute for services previously obtained from ecosystems, especially when the superiority of the engineered system motivated replacement in the first place. We emphasize that the expected tradeoff between natural and manufactured capital is false. Rather, as argued in other contexts, the adoption of new technologies is complementary to ecosystem management. The complementarity of ecosystem services and technology is illustrated with a case study in Barcelona, Spain where the installation of sophisticated water treatment technology increased the value of the ecosystem services found there. Interestingly, the complementarity between natural and built infrastructures may remain even for the very ecosystems that are affected by the technological change. This finding suggests that we can expect the value of ecosystem services to co-evolve with new technologies. Technological innovation can generate new opportunities to harness value from ecosystems, and the engineered structures found in cities may generate more reliance on ecosystem processes, not less.
authors.affiliation: School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, 1933 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada, jhoney@mail.ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Jordi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Honey-Rosés
authors.forename: Daniel W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Schneider
authors.forename: Nicholas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Brozović
mesh_terms: D002947:Cities; D017753:Ecosystem; D004738:Engineering; D013030:Spain; D013672:Technology / Q000639:trends
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jan 18;319(5861):321-3
references.pmid: 18202288
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 22;276(1669):2903-11
references.pmid: 19474040
references.citation: Water Res. 2002 Sep;36(16):3989-4000
references.pmid: 12405408
references.citation: J Hazard Mater. 2007 Feb 9;140(1-2):1-6
references.pmid: 17129670
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2006 Oct;4(11):e360
references.pmid: 17076583
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:54-78
references.pmid: 20146762
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 7;278(1722):3201-8
references.pmid: 21389035
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 25;310(5752):1333-7
references.pmid: 16254151
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):27-8
references.pmid: 16957711
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1383-4
references.pmid: 18173455
references.citation: Science. 1976 Feb 20;191(4228):683-9
references.pmid: 17754162
references.citation: J Environ Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):285-93
references.pmid: 14964383
references.citation: Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1002
references.pmid: 16709769
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Feb;21(1):48-58
references.pmid: 17298510
references.citation: Environ Geochem Health. 2003 Dec;25(4):453-74
references.pmid: 14740988
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jun 29;316(5833):1866-9
references.pmid: 17600209
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2008 Apr;18(3):789-804
references.pmid: 18488635
references.citation: Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1088-90
references.pmid: 16931754