title: 'Practical' resources to support patient and family engagement in healthcare decisions: a scoping review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Extensive literature exists on public involvement or engagement, but what actual tools or guides exist that are practical, tested and easy to use specifically for initiating and implementing patient and family engagement, is uncertain. No comprehensive review and synthesis of general international published or grey literature on this specific topic was found. A systematic scoping review of published and grey literature is, therefore, appropriate for searching through the vast general engagement literature to identify 'patient/family engagement' tools and guides applicable in health organization decision-making, such as within Alberta Health Services in Alberta, Canada. This latter organization requested this search and review to inform the contents of a patient engagement resource kit for patients, providers and leaders.
  
  
  METHODS
  Search terms related to 'patient engagement', tools, guides, education and infrastructure or resources, were applied to published literature databases and grey literature search engines. Grey literature also included United States, Australia and Europe where most known public engagement practices exist, and Canada as the location for this study. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set, and include: English documents referencing 'patient engagement' with specific criteria, and published between 1995 and 2011. For document analysis and synthesis, document analysis worksheets were used by three reviewers for the selected 224 published and 193 grey literature documents. Inter-rater reliability was ensured for the final reviews and syntheses of 76 published and 193 grey documents.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seven key themes emerged from the literature synthesis analysis, and were identified for patient, provider and/or leader groups. Articles/items within each theme were clustered under main topic areas of 'tools', 'education' and 'infrastructure'. The synthesis and findings in the literature include 15 different terms and definitions for 'patient engagement', 17 different engagement models, numerous barriers and benefits, and 34 toolkits for various patient engagement and evaluation initiatives.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patient engagement is very complex. This scoping review for patient/family engagement tools and guides is a good start for a resource inventory and can guide the content development of a patient engagement resource kit to be used by patients/families, healthcare providers and administrators.
authors.affiliation: Health Sciences Council and Interdisciplinary Health Research Academy, 3-389 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton T6G 1C9, Alberta, Canada. kathy.kovacsburns@ualberta.ca.
authors.forename: Katharina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kovacs Burns
authors.forename: Mandy
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bellows
authors.forename: Carol
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Eigenseher
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gallivan
mesh_terms: D022126:Access to Information; D003657:Decision Making; D005190:Family; D006801:Humans; D010358:Patient Participation
references.citation: Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Apr;1(Pt 2):149-62
references.pmid: 18634687
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7
references.pmid: 17615222
references.citation: Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Autumn;21(3):24-8
references.pmid: 19086482
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2002 May;54(10):1471-80
references.pmid: 12061482
references.citation: Br J Community Nurs. 2002 Oct;7(10):546
references.pmid: 12399707
references.citation: J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):265-71
references.pmid: 20539154
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51
references.pmid: 12765705
references.citation: J Health Organ Manag. 2007;21(4-5):470-83
references.pmid: 17933377
references.citation: Healthc Q. 2005;8(3):56-60
references.pmid: 16078403
references.citation: J Interprof Care. 2006 Oct;20(5):527-34
references.pmid: 17000478
references.citation: Collegian. 2010;17(3):125-30
references.pmid: 21046966
references.citation: Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):37-50
references.pmid: 16996637
references.citation: J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;33(3):215-22
references.pmid: 20539148
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004563
references.pmid: 16856050
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Nov;36(3):450-9
references.pmid: 11686760
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2009 Sep;18(18):2547-54
references.pmid: 19207798
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):510-5
references.pmid: 21586433