title: A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Regular monitoring of patient progress is important to assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention. Recently, initiatives within UK child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) have advocated the use of session-by-session monitoring to continually evaluate the patient's outcome throughout the course of the intervention. However, the feasibility and acceptability of such regular monitoring is unknown.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10), administrative staff (n = 8) and families (n = 15) who participated in a feasibility study of an electronic session-by-session outcome monitoring tool, (SxS), which is based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study took place in three CAMHS clinics in Nottinghamshire. The interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found clinicians accepted the need to complete outcome measures, particularly valuing those completed by the patient. However, there were some difficulties with engaging clinicians in this practice and in the training offered. Generally, patients were supportive of completing SxS in the waiting room prior to the clinic session and assistance with the process from administrative staff was seen to be a key factor. Clinicians and families found the feedback reports created from SxS to be helpful for tracking progress, facilitating communication and engagement, and as a point of reflection. The use of technology was considered positively, although some technological difficulties hindered the completion of SxS. Clinicians and families appreciated the brevity of SxS, but some were concerned that a short questionnaire could not adequately encapsulate the complexity of the patient's issues.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings show the need for appropriate infrastructure, mandatory training, and support to enable an effective system of session-by-session monitoring. Our findings indicate that clinicians, administrative staff and young people and their parents/carers would support regular monitoring if the system is easy to implement, with a standard 'clinic-wide' adoption of the procedure, and the resulting data are clinically useful.
authors.affiliation: CLAHRC-NDL, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Charlotte.Hall@nottingham.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Charlotte L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Hall
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moldavsky
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Marriott
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pass
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Newell
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Goodman
authors.forename: Kapil
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sayal
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hollis
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D017028:Caregivers; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D008605:Mental Health Services; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000379:methods*; D010290:Parents; D063868:Patient Outcome Assessment; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
references.citation: Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;17(1):65-79
references.pmid: 21349884
references.citation: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;23(4):239-42
references.pmid: 23896764
references.citation: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;12(1):9-14
references.pmid: 12601559
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 May 01;346:f2669
references.pmid: 23635540
references.citation: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Mar;41(2):141-5
references.pmid: 23867978
references.citation: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 May;34(3):283-91
references.pmid: 17211715
references.citation: BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 20;13:270
references.pmid: 24139139
references.citation: J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Jun;18(2):109-15
references.pmid: 9631348
references.citation: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;47(10):1114-9
references.pmid: 20566188
references.citation: Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2006 Feb;11(1):50-52
references.pmid: 32811061
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Jan;41(1):15-20
references.pmid: 14670390
references.citation: Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2005 Sep;10(3):133-139
references.pmid: 32806837
references.citation: Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;16(3):407-20
references.pmid: 21482583
references.citation: Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;19(4):576-95
references.pmid: 23798719
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):791-9
references.pmid: 10433412
references.citation: BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3
references.pmid: 7627048
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2013 Sep;51(9):564-72
references.pmid: 23856657
references.citation: Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013 May;18(2):82-87
references.pmid: 32847291
references.citation: Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2012 Sep;17(3):129-130
references.pmid: 32847266
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6
references.pmid: 9255702
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;40(11):1228-31
references.pmid: 6639293
references.citation: Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2010 Feb;15(1):30-36
references.pmid: 32847206
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1996 Oct;51(10):1059-64
references.pmid: 8870542
references.citation: Psychother Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):49-68
references.pmid: 25849877
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:413-6
references.pmid: 10616607