title: Cognitive requirements of competing neuro-behavioral decision systems: some implications of temporal horizon for managerial behavior in organizations.
abstract: Interpretation of managerial activity in terms of neuroscience is typically concerned with extreme behaviors such as corporate fraud or reckless investment (Peterson, 2007; Wargo et al., 2010a). This paper is concerned to map out the neurophysiological and cognitive mechanisms at work across the spectrum of managerial behaviors encountered in more day-to-day contexts. It proposes that the competing neuro-behavioral decisions systems (CNBDS) hypothesis (Bickel et al., 2012b) captures well the range of managerial behaviors that can be characterized as hyper- or hypo-activity in either the limbically-based impulsive system or the frontal-cortically based executive system with the corresponding level of activity encountered in the alternative brain region. This pattern of neurophysiological responding also features in the Somatic Marker Hypothesis (Damasio, 1994) and in Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST; Gray and McNaughton, 2000; McNaughton and Corr, 2004), which usefully extend the thesis, for example in the direction of personality. In discussing these theories, the paper has three purposes: to clarify the role of cognitive explanation in neuro-behavioral decision theory, to propose picoeconomics (Ainslie, 1992) as the cognitive component of competing neuro-behavioral decision systems theory and to suggest solutions to the problems of imbalanced neurophysiological activity in managerial behavior. The first is accomplished through discussion of the role of picoeconomics in neuro-behavioral decision theory; the second, by consideration of adaptive-innovative cognitive styles (Kirton, 2003) in the construction of managerial teams, a theme that can now be investigated by a dedicated research program that incorporates psychometric analysis of personality types and cognitive styles involved in managerial decision-making and the underlying neurophysiological bases of such decision-making.
authors.affiliation: Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: Gordon R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Foxall
keywords: adaption-innovation; cognitive style; decision-making; neuro-behavioral decisions systems; organizational management; picoeconomics
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jun;221(3):361-87
references.pmid: 22441659
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3801-11
references.pmid: 18829433
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;44(6):573-88
references.pmid: 3579504
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:186-205
references.pmid: 17804525
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:473-500
references.pmid: 10845072
references.citation: Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;20:289-309
references.pmid: 19552313
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:102-8
references.pmid: 17717098
references.citation: Psychiatr Dev. 1986 Autumn;4(3):167-226
references.pmid: 3809156
references.citation: Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):406-15
references.pmid: 21732213
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1458-63
references.pmid: 16251988
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2007 Jun;75(2):129-45
references.pmid: 17379454
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Feb;63(2):199-204
references.pmid: 16769143
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):334-42
references.pmid: 10731228
references.citation: Addiction. 2001 Jan;96(1):73-86
references.pmid: 11177521
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):241-63
references.pmid: 12383780
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):503-7
references.pmid: 15486304
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:122-41
references.pmid: 17717092
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 22;301(5636):1104-7
references.pmid: 12934011
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:43-73
references.pmid: 17804523
references.citation: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Dec;18(6):546-52
references.pmid: 21186929
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):295-307
references.pmid: 10731224
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):199-207
references.pmid: 11257908
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:163-85
references.pmid: 17804524
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Aug 28;39(5):855-67
references.pmid: 12948451
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:206-10
references.pmid: 17717095
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):447-54
references.pmid: 10550495
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:1-17
references.pmid: 17717101
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94
references.pmid: 9000892
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):285-305
references.pmid: 15225972
references.citation: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep;90 Suppl 1:S85-91
references.pmid: 17101239
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:109-21
references.pmid: 17717094
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):373-90
references.pmid: 10550488
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:90-101
references.pmid: 17717096
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Sep;217(2):177-87
references.pmid: 21487658
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Nov;1118:18-42
references.pmid: 17717097
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Apr 15;15(5):669-74
references.pmid: 22504347