title: An exploration of the psycho-sexual experiences of women who have undergone female genital cutting: a case of the Maasai in Kenya.
abstract: The research explored the link between type II Female Genital Cutting (FGC) and sexual functioning. This thesis summary thus draws from an exploratory ethnographic field study carried out among the Maasai people of Kenya where type II FGC is still being practiced. A purposely sample consisting of 28 women and 19 men, within the ages of 15-80 years took part in individual interviews and 5 focus group discussions. Participants responded to open-ended questions, a method deemed appropriate to elicit insider's in-depth information. The study found out that one of the desired effects of FGC ritual among the Maasai was to reduce women's sexual desire, embodied as tamed sexuality. This consequence was however not experienced as an impediment to sexual function. The research established that esteeming transformational processes linked with the FGC 'rite of passage' are crucial in shaping a woman's femininity, identity, marriageable status and legitimating sexuality. In turn, these elements are imperative in inculcating and nurturing a positive body-self image and sex appeal and consequently, positive sexual self actualization. These finding brings to question the validity of conventional sexuality theory, particularly those that subscribe to bio-physical models as universal bases for understanding the subject of female sexual functioning among women with FGC. Socio-cultural-symbolic nexus and constructions of sexuality should also be considered when investigating psychosexual consequences of FGC.
authors.affiliation: Department of Reproduction, Development and Regeneration, Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Catholic University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Blok D - Bus 07001, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Esho
keywords: Female genital cutting; Maasai; female circumcision; psychosexual effects; sexual functioning
references.citation: East Afr Med J. 1992 Sep;69(9):479-82
references.pmid: 1286628
references.citation: BJOG. 2007 Feb;114(2):201-6
references.pmid: 17305892
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 May-Jun;31(3):187-200
references.pmid: 16020138
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2006 Nov;3(6):954-959
references.pmid: 17100927
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;24(3):281-3
references.pmid: 15203627
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2002 Jan-Feb;28(1):79-86
references.pmid: 11928182
references.citation: Cult Health Sex. 2005 Sep-Oct;7(5):443-61
references.pmid: 16864215
references.citation: Arch Sex Behav. 2002 Oct;31(5):405-11
references.pmid: 12238607
references.citation: Reprod Freedom News. 2000 Sep;9(9):1-3
references.pmid: 12296161
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003 Feb;29(1):12-9
references.pmid: 12696622
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2000 Apr-Jun;26(2):191-208
references.pmid: 10782451
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29 Suppl 1:11-21
references.pmid: 12735086
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2001 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43
references.pmid: 11224952
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2007 Nov;4(6):1666-78
references.pmid: 17970975
references.citation: BJOG. 2002 Oct;109(10):1089-96
references.pmid: 12387460
references.citation: J Sex Res. 2002 Feb;39(1):15-21
references.pmid: 12476251
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Jul 30-Aug 5;366(9483):385-91
references.pmid: 16054938
references.citation: J Sex Marital Ther. 2001 Oct-Dec;27(5):465-73
references.pmid: 11554208
references.citation: Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Winter;51(1):84-97
references.pmid: 18192768