title: Hypermotility in Clostridium perfringens strain SM101 is due to spontaneous mutations in genes linked to cell division.
abstract: Clostridium perfringens is a Gram-positive anaerobic pathogen of humans and animals. Although they lack flagella, C. perfringens bacteria can still migrate across surfaces using a type of gliding motility that involves the formation of filaments of bacteria lined up in an end-to-end conformation. In strain SM101, hypermotile variants are often found arising from the edges of colonies on agar plates. Hypermotile cells are longer than wild-type cells, and video microscopy of their gliding motility suggests that they form long, thin filaments that move rapidly away from a colony, analogously to swarmer cells in bacteria with flagella. To identify the cause(s) of the hypermotility phenotype, the genome sequences of normal strains and their direct hypermotile derivatives were determined and compared. Strains SM124 and SM127, hypermotile derivatives of strains SM101 and SM102, respectively, contained 10 and 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) relative to their parent strains. While SNPs were located in different genes in the two sets of strains, one feature in common was mutations in cell division genes, an ftsI homolog in strain SM124 (CPR_1831) and a minE homolog in strain SM127 (CPR_2104). Complementation of these mutations with wild-type copies of each gene restored the normal motility phenotype. A model explaining the principles underlying the hypermotility phenotype is presented.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: Hualan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: Kristin D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: McCord
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: Jonathon
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Howarth
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: David L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Popham
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
authors.forename: Roderick V
authors.initials: RV
authors.lastname: Jensen
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA melville@vt.edu.
authors.forename: Stephen B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Melville
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D002455:Cell Division / Q000235:genetics; D002506:Cephalexin / Q000494:pharmacology; D003016:Clostridium perfringens / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial / Q000502:physiology*; D005816:Genetic Complementation Test; D009068:Movement; D009154:Mutation
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D002506:Cephalexin
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011 Jun 10;409(3):367-71
references.pmid: 21586276
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:333-60
references.pmid: 9891801
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2013 Feb;195(3):629-36
references.pmid: 23204460
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2010 Jun;76(6):1411-26
references.pmid: 20398206
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 Jan;190(1):48-60
references.pmid: 17981974
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(11):3328-35
references.pmid: 18378644
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2011 May;80(3):612-27
references.pmid: 21414037
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1998 Jan;180(1):136-42
references.pmid: 9422603
references.citation: Trends Genet. 1995 Jun;11(6):217-8
references.pmid: 7638902
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2003 Jul;185(13):3726-34
references.pmid: 12813065
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 9;92(10):4313-7
references.pmid: 7753804
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2001 Jun 29;310(1):243-57
references.pmid: 11419950
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2000 Aug;182(16):4491-9
references.pmid: 10913082
references.citation: Genome Res. 2006 Aug;16(8):1031-40
references.pmid: 16825665
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):996-1001
references.pmid: 11792842
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013 Sep;77(3):323-41
references.pmid: 24006467
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;77(2):471-8
references.pmid: 21097603
references.citation: Biophys J. 2007 Jul 15;93(2):699-703
references.pmid: 17483165
references.citation: Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:539-62
references.pmid: 17328675
references.citation: Infect Immun. 1994 Dec;62(12):5550-8
references.pmid: 7960138
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2006 Nov;62(3):680-94
references.pmid: 16999833
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1997 Jun;24(5):905-15
references.pmid: 9219999