title: Carbon allocation and element composition in four Chlamydomonas mutants defective in genes related to the CO2 concentrating mechanism.
abstract: Four mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with defects in different components of the CO2 concentrating mechanism (CCM) or in Rubisco activase were grown autotrophically at high pCO2 and then transferred to low pCO2, in order to study the role of different components of the CCM on carbon allocation and elemental composition. To study carbon allocation, we measured the relative size of the main organic pools by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy. Total reflection X-ray fluorescence was used to analyze the elemental composition of algal cells. Our data show that although the organic pools increased their size at high CO2 in all strains, their stoichiometry was highly homeostatic, i.e., the ratios between carbohydrates and proteins, lipid and proteins, and carbohydrates and lipids, did not change significantly. The only exception was the wild-type 137c, in which proteins decreased relative to carbohydrates and lipids, when the cells were transferred to low CO2. It is noticeable that the two wild types used in this study responded differently to the transition from high to low CO2. Malfunctions of the CCM influenced the concentration of several elements, somewhat altering cell elemental stoichiometry: especially the C/P and N/P ratios changed appreciably in almost all strains as a function of the growth CO2 concentration, except in 137c and the Rubisco activase mutant rca1. In strain cia3, defective in the lumenal carbonic anhydrase (CA), the cell quotas of P, S, Ca, Mn, Fe, and Zn were about 5-fold higher at low CO2 than at high CO2. A Principle Components Analysis showed that, mostly because of its elemental composition, cia3 behaved in a substantially different way from all other strains, at low CO2. The lumenal CA thus plays a crucial role, not only for the correct functioning of the CCM, but also for element utilization. Not surprisingly, growth at high CO2 attenuated differences among strains.
authors.affiliation: Laboratorio di Fisiologia delle Alghe e delle Piante, Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy.
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Memmola
authors.forename: Bratati
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Mukherjee
authors.forename: James V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Moroney
authors.forename: Mario
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Giordano
mesh_terms: D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism*; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000378:metabolism*; D002696:Chlamydomonas / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D016825:Chlamydomonas reinhardtii / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D002244:Carbon
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2012 May;24(5):1860-75
references.pmid: 22634764
references.citation: Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):737-47
references.pmid: 8394263
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Oct;34(10):1666-77
references.pmid: 21707652
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Dec;133(4):1854-61
references.pmid: 14605215
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:99-131
references.pmid: 15862091
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2011 Jun;156(2):884-96
references.pmid: 21527423
references.citation: J Phycol. 2012 Jun;48(3):539-49
references.pmid: 27011069
references.citation: Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Aug;6(8):1251-9
references.pmid: 17557885
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1989 Mar;89(3):897-903
references.pmid: 16666639
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2001 Jul 1;15(13):1652-61
references.pmid: 11445540
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2011 Sep;109(1-3):281-96
references.pmid: 21327536
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):578-80
references.pmid: 11117743
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75
references.pmid: 14907713
references.citation: EMBO J. 1998 Aug 10;17(5):1208-16
references.pmid: 9482718
references.citation: Plant Sci. 2013 Oct;211:92-101
references.pmid: 23987815
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Dec;54(6):1665-9
references.pmid: 4379719
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5341-6
references.pmid: 11309511
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 1996 Jan;47(1):1-11
references.pmid: 24301702
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Jul;135(3):1595-607
references.pmid: 15235119
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 19;367(1588):493-507
references.pmid: 22232762
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5347-52
references.pmid: 11287669
references.citation: J Phycol. 2011 Apr;47(2):313-23
references.pmid: 27021863
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2014 Sep;121(2-3):111-24
references.pmid: 24390639
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960 Jan;46(1):83-91
references.pmid: 16590601
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Feb;37(2):512-9
references.pmid: 23927015
references.citation: J Phycol. 2009 Apr;45(2):522-31
references.pmid: 27033830
references.citation: Photosynth Res. 2011 Sep;109(1-3):133-49
references.pmid: 21365258