title: Impact of cultivar selection and process optimization on ethanol yield from different varieties of sugarcane.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The development of 'energycane' varieties of sugarcane is underway, targeting the use of both sugar juice and bagasse for ethanol production. The current study evaluated a selection of such 'energycane' cultivars for the combined ethanol yields from juice and bagasse, by optimization of dilute acid pretreatment optimization of bagasse for sugar yields.
  
  
  METHODS
  A central composite design under response surface methodology was used to investigate the effects of dilute acid pretreatment parameters followed by enzymatic hydrolysis on the combined sugar yield of bagasse samples. The pressed slurry generated from optimum pretreatment conditions (maximum combined sugar yield) was used as the substrate during batch and fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes at different solid loadings and enzyme dosages, aiming to reach an ethanol concentration of at least 40 g/L.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Significant variations were observed in sugar yields (xylose, glucose and combined sugar yield) from pretreatment-hydrolysis of bagasse from different cultivars of sugarcane. Up to 33% difference in combined sugar yield between best performing varieties and industrial bagasse was observed at optimal pretreatment-hydrolysis conditions. Significant improvement in overall ethanol yield after SSF of the pretreated bagasse was also observed from the best performing varieties (84.5 to 85.6%) compared to industrial bagasse (74.5%). The ethanol concentration showed inverse correlation with lignin content and the ratio of xylose to arabinose, but it showed positive correlation with glucose yield from pretreatment-hydrolysis. The overall assessment of the cultivars showed greater improvement in the final ethanol concentration (26.9 to 33.9%) and combined ethanol yields per hectare (83 to 94%) for the best performing varieties with respect to industrial sugarcane.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results suggest that the selection of sugarcane variety to optimize ethanol production from bagasse can be achieved without adversely affecting juice ethanol and cane yield, thus maintaining first generation ethanol production levels while maximizing second generation ethanol production.
authors.affiliation: Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa.
authors.forename: Yuda
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Benjamin
authors.affiliation: Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa.
authors.forename: Maria P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: García-Aparicio
authors.affiliation: Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch 7602, South Africa.
authors.forename: Johann F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Görgens
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2007 Jul;98(10):2034-42
references.pmid: 17029957
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Dec;102(24):11089-96
references.pmid: 21741233
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jan;103(1):152-61
references.pmid: 22019267
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;172(2):610-30
references.pmid: 24104688
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 Apr;108(4):924-33
references.pmid: 21404265
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Dec;10(9):1067-76
references.pmid: 22924974
references.citation: Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):790-2
references.pmid: 20705851
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;25(4):153-7
references.pmid: 17320227
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;35(12):1605-13
references.pmid: 18685877
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2010 Apr;8(3):263-76
references.pmid: 20388126
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010 Mar 1;105(4):718-28
references.pmid: 19882718
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2002 May;83(1):1-11
references.pmid: 12058826
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011 Sep;38(9):1467-75
references.pmid: 21210180
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2003 May;3(3):319-26
references.pmid: 12689639
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2008 Sep;99(14):6046-53
references.pmid: 18262784
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Oct 1;111(3):206-15
references.pmid: 16945441
references.citation: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2008 May 01;1(1):7
references.pmid: 18471273
references.citation: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:5-37
references.pmid: 10849776
references.citation: Yeast. 1992 Jul;8(7):501-17
references.pmid: 1523884
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Sep;59(6):618-28
references.pmid: 12226717
references.citation: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Dec 06;4(1):55
references.pmid: 22145819