title: Texture analysis of T1 - and T2 -weighted MR images and use of probabilistic neural network to discriminate posterior fossa tumours in children.
abstract: Brain tumours are the most common solid tumours in children, representing 20% of all cancers. The most frequent posterior fossa tumours are medulloblastomas, pilocytic astrocytomas and ependymomas. Texture analysis (TA) of MR images can be used to support the diagnosis of these tumours by providing additional quantitative information. MaZda software was used to perform TA on T1 - and T2 -weighted images of children with pilocytic astrocytomas, medulloblastomas and ependymomas of the posterior fossa, who had MRI at Birmingham Children's Hospital prior to treatment. The region of interest was selected on three slices per patient in Image J, using thresholding and manual outlining. TA produced 279 features, which were reduced using principal component analysis (PCA). The principal components (PCs) explaining 95% of the variance were used in a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and a probabilistic neural network (PNN) to classify the cases, using DTREG statistics software. PCA of texture features from both T1 - and T2 -weighted images yielded 13 PCs to explain >95% of the variance. The PNN classifier for T1 -weighted images achieved 100% accuracy on training the data and 90% on leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV); for T2 -weighted images, the accuracy was 100% on training the data and 93.3% on LOOCV. A PNN classifier with T1 and T2 PCs achieved 100% accuracy on training the data and 85.8% on LOOCV. LDA classification accuracies were noticeably poorer. The features found to hold the highest discriminating potential were all co-occurrence matrix derived, where adjacent pixels had highly correlated intensities. This study shows that TA can be performed on standard T1 - and T2 -weighted images of childhood posterior fossa tumours using readily available software to provide high diagnostic accuracy. Discriminatory features do not correspond to those used in the clinical interpretation of the images and therefore provide novel tumour information.
authors.affiliation: Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Eleni
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Orphanidou-Vlachou
authors.forename: Nikolaos
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Vlachos
authors.forename: Nigel P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Theodoros N
authors.initials: TN
authors.lastname: Arvanitis
authors.forename: Richard G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Grundy
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Peet
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D006801:Humans; D015192:Infratentorial Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D011336:Probability
keywords: MRI; paediatric posterior fossa tumours; texture analysis
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 2008 Oct;21(8):908-18
references.pmid: 18613254
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1997 May;86(5):755-61
references.pmid: 9126888
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 May;31(5):809-16
references.pmid: 20395383
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Oct;31(9):1613-6
references.pmid: 20538820
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Sep;17(7):1025-31
references.pmid: 10463653
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Mar 3;43(4):720-6
references.pmid: 19914622
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1398-405
references.pmid: 19796694
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Jan;40(1):3-30
references.pmid: 19937238
references.citation: J Child Neurol. 2009 Nov;24(11):1343-65
references.pmid: 19841424
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan;25(1):144-6
references.pmid: 17222726
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):447-57
references.pmid: 21918916
references.citation: Comput Biol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):519-24
references.pmid: 18342845
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1521-37
references.pmid: 12414291
references.citation: Anticancer Res. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):3399-405
references.pmid: 16101155
references.citation: Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2005 Jul;35(6):230-45
references.pmid: 15956960
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Oct;51(2):217-26
references.pmid: 12133614
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jan;22(1):81-91
references.pmid: 14972397
references.citation: Epilepsia. 2003 Dec;44(12):1546-50
references.pmid: 14636326
references.citation: Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Apr 15;14(8):2357-62
references.pmid: 18413825
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;23(3):458-64
references.pmid: 7960369
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Jan;15(1):68-74
references.pmid: 11793459
references.citation: Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Apr;94(1):66-76
references.pmid: 18922598
references.citation: IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1990;1(1):111-21
references.pmid: 18282828
references.citation: Mol Cancer. 2009 Feb 10;8:6
references.pmid: 19208232
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Aug;240(2):318-32
references.pmid: 16864664
references.citation: Cells Tissues Organs. 2006;182(3-4):182-92
references.pmid: 16914920
references.citation: J Child Neurol. 2009 Nov;24(11):1397-408
references.pmid: 19841428
references.citation: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1991 Nov;3(6):323-9
references.pmid: 1742231
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 2013 Feb;49(3):658-67
references.pmid: 23036849
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Nov;21(9):989-93
references.pmid: 14684201
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Nov;22(5):674-80
references.pmid: 16215966
references.citation: Radiographics. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):1613-37
references.pmid: 14615567