title: Assessing sarcopenic prevalence and risk factors in residential aged care: methodology and feasibility.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Sarcopenia is a significant geriatric syndrome with both health care expenditure and personal burden. Most recently, the European Working Group in Sarcopenia in Older Adults has established a consensus definition and assessment criteria for sarcopenia that includes a below-normal muscle mass and muscle function (either or both of below-normal muscle strength and physical performance). Using these criteria, work is needed to identify the prevalence and risk factors among the old, and those most susceptible to sarcopenia, the very old. This manuscript describes the recruitment and data collection methodology, and direct burden to participants, among a very old cohort residing in a residential aged care (RAC) setting.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eleven RAC facilities participated in the study. Potential participants were identified by the facility service manager and then randomised into the study. All participants gave self or substitute decision maker consent. Participants undertook a single one on one assessment that included measures of sarcopenia, functional capacity, cognitive and nutritional health, falls, activity, facility and hospital history, physical activity and assessment burden. A sub-study of physical activity and sedentary behaviours measured by activPAL3™ inclinometer was also conducted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 709 residents, 328 were ineligible to participate. Two hundred and seventy-three residents were randomised to the study and 102 gave informed or substitute decision maker consent. Participants were 84.5 ± 8.2 years of age and had been in care for 1,204.2 ± 1,220.1 days. The groups need for care was high (Aged Care Funding Instrument score of 2.6 ± 1.7) and they had a below-normal functional (Short Physical Performance Battery summery score of 3.5 ± 2.4). The larger percentage of participants had no depression and normal cognitive capacity. A total of 33 residents participated in the activPAL study. Each assessment took an average of 27.0 ± 7.0 min, with a low assessment burden reported by participants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The successful assessment of sarcopenia and physical activity in a RAC setting is labour intensive to establish, but feasible to conduct. Low recruitment numbers and the restrictive exclusion criteria, may have limited the accuracy of this work. However, this work is a primary step in establishing the level of sarcopenia and its risk factors for those in end-of-life care.
authors.affiliation: University of Queensland and Blue Care Research and Practice Development Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Queensland, 56 Sylvan Rd, Brisbane, Queensland, 4066, Australia, t.henwood@uq.edu.au.
authors.forename: Timothy R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Henwood
authors.forename: Justin W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Keogh
authors.forename: Natasha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Reid
authors.forename: Will
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Jordan
authors.forename: Hugh E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Senior
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Apr;55(4):M221-31
references.pmid: 10811152
references.citation: Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):430-6
references.pmid: 21502163
references.citation: QJM. 2007 Aug;100(8):469-84
references.pmid: 17566006
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Jun;19(3):177-82
references.pmid: 17337519
references.citation: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jun;13(5):418-28
references.pmid: 22169509
references.citation: J Nutr Health Aging. 2011 Jun;15(6):450-5
references.pmid: 21623466
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):56-62
references.pmid: 16420198
references.citation: Australas J Ageing. 2011 Jun;30(2):63-9
references.pmid: 21672114
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Aug;89(2):465-71
references.pmid: 10926627
references.citation: Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 04;10(12):6783-98
references.pmid: 24304508
references.citation: Geriatr Nurs. 1999 Jul-Aug;20(4):212-3
references.pmid: 10711094
references.citation: J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
references.pmid: 1202204
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Oct;61(10):1059-64
references.pmid: 17077199
references.citation: J Nutr Health Aging. 2006 Nov-Dec;10(6):466-85; discussion 485-7
references.pmid: 17183419
references.citation: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 May;12(4):249-56
references.pmid: 21527165
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Nov;95(5):1851-60
references.pmid: 14555665
references.citation: Geriatr Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):31-6
references.pmid: 24139206
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Jan;67(1):48-55
references.pmid: 21393423
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 15;147(8):755-63
references.pmid: 9554417
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34
references.pmid: 7814786
references.citation: Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Mar;35(3):130-4
references.pmid: 16525526
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep;53(9):1618-22
references.pmid: 16137297
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1994 Mar;49(2):M85-94
references.pmid: 8126356
references.citation: Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23
references.pmid: 20392703
references.citation: JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8
references.pmid: 21205966
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Dec;57(12):M772-7
references.pmid: 12456735
references.citation: Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Feb 21;9:369-76
references.pmid: 24591821
references.citation: J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Apr;18(2):171-84
references.pmid: 20440029
references.citation: Clin Nutr. 2010 Dec;29(6):745-8
references.pmid: 20627486
references.citation: Clin Geriatr Med. 2011 Aug;27(3):355-63
references.pmid: 21824552
references.citation: JAMA. 1990 Jun 13;263(22):3029-34
references.pmid: 2342214
references.citation: Mech Ageing Dev. 2003 Mar;124(3):247-8
references.pmid: 12663121
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):556-61
references.pmid: 7838189