title: Tuning of automatic exposure control strength in lumbar spine CT.
abstract: To investigate the impact of tuning the automatic exposure control (AEC) strength curve (specific to Care Dose 4D®; Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) from "average" to "strong" on image quality, radiation dose and operator dependency during lumbar spine CT examinations.
  
  
  
  Two hospitals (H1, H2), both using the same scanners, were considered for two time periods (P1 and P2). During P1, the AEC curve was "average" and radiographers had to select one of two protocols according to the body mass index (BMI): "standard" if BMI <30.0 kg m(-2) (120 kV-330 mAs) or "large" if BMI >30.0 kg m(-2) (140 kV-280 mAs). During P2, the AEC curve was changed to "strong", and all acquisitions were obtained with one protocol (120 kV and 270 mAs). Image quality was scored and patients' diameters calculated for both periods.
  
  
  
  497 examinations were analysed. There was no significant difference in mean diameters according to hospitals and periods (p > 0.801) and in quality scores between periods (p > 0.172). There was a significant difference between hospitals regarding how often the "large" protocol was assigned [13 (10%)/132 patients in H1 vs 37 (28%)/133 in H2] (p < 0.001). During P1, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was higher in H2 (+13%; p = 0.050). In both hospitals, CTDIvol was reduced between periods (-19.2% in H1 and -29.4% in H2; p < 0.001).
  
  
  
  An operator dependency in protocol selection, unexplained by patient diameters or highlighted by image quality scores, has been observed. Tuning the AEC curve from average to strong enables suppression of the operator dependency in protocol selection and related dose increase, while preserving image quality.
  
  
  
  CT acquisition protocols based on weight are responsible for biases in protocol selection. Using an appropriate AEC strength curve reduces the number of protocols to one. Operator dependency of protocol selection is thereby eliminated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: Aurélie
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: D'Hondt
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cornil
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bohy
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: De Maertelaer
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Gevenois
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tack
mesh_terms: D015992:Body Mass Index; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):174-9
references.pmid: 22550311
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):547-52
references.pmid: 17242267
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1141-7
references.pmid: 19770340
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):1342-6
references.pmid: 21098193
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Aug;236(2):565-71
references.pmid: 16040914
references.citation: Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):218-24
references.pmid: 20308458
references.citation: Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):841-7
references.pmid: 23091173
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Sep;11(7):720-5
references.pmid: 2947336
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1988 Feb 4;318(5):291-300
references.pmid: 2961994
references.citation: Clin Radiol. 1994 Aug;49(8):537-40
references.pmid: 7955865
references.citation: Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Dec;142(2-4):244-54
references.pmid: 20926508
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):213-23
references.pmid: 16126917
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):619-28
references.pmid: 14739312
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;57(2):174-9
references.pmid: 15125627
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Feb;190(2):W100-5
references.pmid: 18212190
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2013 Jan;20(1):39-44
references.pmid: 22898866
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Aug;244(2):524-31
references.pmid: 17641371
references.citation: Rofo. 2022 Jul;194(7):717-719
references.pmid: 35817033
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Jun;50(3):347-52
references.pmid: 8935469
references.citation: Radiology. 2012 Dec;265(3):666-8
references.pmid: 23175540
references.citation: Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):889-905
references.pmid: 21163918