title: Testing the economic independence hypothesis: the effect of an exogenous increase in child support on subsequent marriage and cohabitation.
abstract: We examine the effects of an increase in income on the cohabitation and marriage of single mothers. Using data from an experiment that resulted in randomly assigned differences in child support receipt for welfare-receiving single mothers, we find that exogenous income increases (as a result of receiving all child support that was paid) are associated with significantly lower cohabitation rates between mothers and men who are not the fathers of their child(ren). Overall, these results support the hypothesis that additional income increases disadvantaged women's economic independence by reducing the need to be in the least stable type of partnerships. Our results also show the potential importance of distinguishing between biological and social fathers.
authors.affiliation: La Follette School of Public Affairs, School of Social Work, and Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Room 3412, Madison, WI, 53706, USA, mcancian@wisc.edu.
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cancian
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Meyer
mesh_terms: D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D008393:Marriage / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009035:Mothers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011632:Public Assistance / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015406:Single Parent / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
references.citation: J Marriage Fam. 2008 Aug;70(3):625-639
references.pmid: 21909158
references.citation: Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2011 Apr 26;635(1):56-75
references.pmid: 21643452
references.citation: Demography. 2003 Aug;40(3):451-78
references.pmid: 12962058
references.citation: Demography. 1995 Nov;32(4):509-20
references.pmid: 8925943
references.citation: Demogr Res. 2008;19:1663-1692
references.pmid: 19119426
references.citation: Demography. 2003 Feb;40(1):105-26
references.pmid: 12647516
references.citation: Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41
references.pmid: 28489526
references.citation: Fam Relat. 2009 Dec 1;58(5):647-661
references.pmid: 26478647
references.citation: Annu Rev Sociol. 1997;23:431-53
references.pmid: 12348280
references.citation: Demography. 2003 May;40(2):351-67
references.pmid: 12846136
references.citation: Demography. 2011 Aug;48(3):957-82
references.pmid: 21671198
references.citation: Demography. 2004 May;41(2):237-61
references.pmid: 15209039
references.citation: Demography. 2006 Feb;43(1):53-77
references.pmid: 16579208
references.citation: Future Child. 2010 Fall;20(2):17-37
references.pmid: 20964130
references.citation: Demography. 2006 May;43(2):223-40
references.pmid: 16889126
references.citation: Soc Forces. 2012 Sep;91(1):45-53
references.pmid: 23378674
references.citation: AJS. 2011 Sep;117(2):627-67
references.pmid: 22268248
references.citation: Soc Forces. 2012;90(3):817-841
references.pmid: 23015762
references.citation: Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):331-41
references.pmid: 9275243