title: The portrayal of healthy women requesting oocyte cryo-preservation.
abstract: The possibility to cryopreserve oocytes to be used in IVF treatment later in life has not only enlarged the reproductive options of cancer patients who are faced with gonadotoxic treatments, but also holds the promise of enlarging the reproductive options of healthy women whose personal circumstances (most often the absence of a partner) do not allow them to reproduce in their most fertile years. Opinions for and against this application of the cryopreservation technology are often based on different portrayals of the women who might use it. Three different portrayals can be discerned in the debate about the ethics of so-called 'social egg freezing' or 'non medical egg freezing'. First, these women have been portrayed as selfish career-pursuing women. Second, healthy women who might benefit from oocyte cryopreservation have been portrayed as victims of a male-oriented society that makes it difficult for women to combine motherhood with a good education or professional responsibilities. Third, healthy women -opting to cryopreserve oocytes have been portrayed as wise, proactive women who will not have to depend on -oocyte donors should they suffer from age-related infertility by the time they are ready to reproduce. Each of these three portrayals has its own shortcomings that one should be wary of, as they lead to an oversimplification of the ethical debate.
authors.affiliation: Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Mertes
keywords: Oocyte cryopreservation; delayed childbearing; ethics; social egg freezing
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1509-12
references.pmid: 19836734
references.citation: Matern Child Health J. 2007 Mar;11(2):189-98
references.pmid: 17237994
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2239-46
references.pmid: 20591872
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2000 Nov;74(5):1057-8
references.pmid: 11056263
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Dec;23(7):824-9
references.pmid: 22019616
references.citation: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jun;8(6):32-5
references.pmid: 18726778
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Mar;6(2):151-3
references.pmid: 12675988
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2007 Dec;88(6):1495-6
references.pmid: 17945220
references.citation: Bioethics. 2009 Jan;23(1):47-58
references.pmid: 19076941
references.citation: Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Mar;34(3):187-8, 206
references.pmid: 15799672
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Sep;23(3):334-40
references.pmid: 21775211
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2162-8
references.pmid: 19296943
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):291-4
references.pmid: 21722891
references.citation: Bioethics. 2009 Jan;23(1):39-46
references.pmid: 18945249
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2008 Oct;90(4):1036-42
references.pmid: 17905234
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(1):31-4
references.pmid: 25206964
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2012 Mar;38(3):154-7
references.pmid: 21964479
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):655-61
references.pmid: 21212052
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1779-85
references.pmid: 19386632
references.citation: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Jul 5;152(27):1507-12
references.pmid: 18681359
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Apr 19;1(8486):884-6
references.pmid: 2870356
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Dec;59(3):276-82
references.pmid: 16326266
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):558-64
references.pmid: 16293651
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Jan;25(1):66-73
references.pmid: 19861328
references.citation: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;35(5):625-33
references.pmid: 16958718
references.citation: J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Feb;27(2-3):69-74
references.pmid: 20140641
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2413.e7-9
references.pmid: 20097336
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2012 Jun;27(6):1606-12
references.pmid: 22442248
references.citation: Cancer Treat Res. 2010;156:223-35
references.pmid: 20811837