title: Competition between phytoplankton and bacteria: exclusion and coexistence.
abstract: Resource-based competition between microorganisms species in continuous culture has been studied extensively both experimentally and theoretically, mostly for bacteria through Monod and Contois "constant yield" models, or for phytoplankton through the Droop "variable yield" models. For homogeneous populations of N bacterial species (Monod) or N phytoplanktonic species (Droop), with one limiting substrate and under constant controls, the theoretical studies indicated that competitive exclusion occurs: only one species wins the competition and displaces all the others (Armstrong and McGehee in Am Nat 115:151, 1980; Hsu and Hsu in SIAM J Appl Math 68:1600-1617, 2008). The winning species expected from theory is the one with the lowest "substrate subsistence concentration" s([star]), such that its corresponding equilibrium growth rate is equal to the dilution rate D. This theoretical result was validated experimentally with phytoplankton (Tilman and Sterner in Oecologia 61(2):197-200, 1984) and bacteria (Hansen and Hubell in Science 207(4438):1491-1493, 1980), and observed in a lake with microalgae (Tilman in Ecology 58(22):338-348, 1977). On the contrary for aggregating bacterial species described by a Contois model, theory predicts coexistence between several species (Grognard et al. in Discrete Contin Dyn Syst Ser B 8(1):73-93, 2007). In this paper we present a generalization of these results by studying a competition between three different types of microorganisms: planktonic (or free) bacteria (represented by a generalized Monod model), aggregating bacteria (represented by a Contois model) and free phytoplankton (represented by a Droop model). We prove that the outcome of the competition is a coexistence between several aggregating bacterial species with a free species of bacteria or phytoplankton, all the other free species being washed out. This demonstration is based mainly on the study of the substrate concentration's evolution caused by competition; it converges towards the lowest subsistence concentration s([star]), leading to three different types of competition outcomes: (1) the best free bacteria or phytoplankton competitor excludes all other species; (2) only some aggregating bacterial species coexist in the chemostat; (3) A coexistence between the single best free species, with one or several aggregating species.
authors.affiliation: INRIA Sophia-Antipolis-Team BIOCORE, 2004 route des lucioles, BP 93, 06902 , Sophia Antipolis, France, frederic.grognard@inria.fr.
authors.forename: Frédéric
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Grognard
authors.forename: Pierre
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Masci
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Benoît
authors.forename: Olivier
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Bernard
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000254:growth & development; D018407:Bacterial Physiological Phenomena; D005075:Biological Evolution; D017753:Ecosystem; D055641:Mathematical Concepts; D008954:Models, Biological; D010839:Phytoplankton / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Nov;65(6):635-48
references.pmid: 15300417
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1975 Mar;50(1):185-201
references.pmid: 1127957
references.citation: J Biosci Bioeng. 2006 Feb;101(2):87-96
references.pmid: 16569602
references.citation: Science. 1959 Aug 28;130(3374):477-82
references.pmid: 14444298
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Jun;57(4):325-37
references.pmid: 10900186
references.citation: J Math Biol. 2003 Jan;46(1):48-70
references.pmid: 12525935
references.citation: Math Biosci. 1994 Jun;121(2):127-39
references.pmid: 8054762
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1959 Aug;21:40-50
references.pmid: 13811643
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2012 Sep;119:79-87
references.pmid: 22728186
references.citation: Science. 1980 Mar 28;207(4438):1491-3
references.pmid: 6767274
references.citation: Science. 1981 Aug 28;213(4511):972-9
references.pmid: 7268409
references.citation: Math Biosci. 1995 May;127(1):19-43
references.pmid: 7734856
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Oct 1;42(1):25-35
references.pmid: 19709263
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Dec;64(4):655-71
references.pmid: 11104813
references.citation: Math Biosci. 1992 Oct;111(2):261-78
references.pmid: 1515747
references.citation: Oecologia. 1984 Feb;61(2):197-200
references.pmid: 28309411
references.citation: Biotechnol Adv. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):294-306
references.pmid: 17350212
references.citation: Science. 1960 Apr 29;131(3409):1292-7
references.pmid: 14399717