title: Coyotes, deer, and wildflowers: diverse evidence points to a trophic cascade.
abstract: Spatial gradients in human activity, coyote activity, deer activity, and deer herbivory provide an unusual type of evidence for a trophic cascade. Activity of coyotes, which eat young mule deer (fawns), decreased with proximity to a remote biological field station, indicating that these predators avoided an area of high human activity. In contrast, activity of adult female deer (does) and intensity of herbivory on palatable plant species both increased with proximity to the station and were positively correlated with each other. The gradient in deer activity was not explained by availabilities of preferred habitats or plant species because these did not vary with distance from the station. Does spent less time feeding when they encountered coyote urine next to a feed block, indicating that increased vigilance may contribute, along with avoidance of areas with coyotes, to lower herbivory away from the station. Judging from two palatable wildflower species whose seed crop and seedling recruitment were greatly reduced near the field station, the coyote-deer-wildflower trophic cascade has the potential to influence plant community composition. Our study illustrates the value of a case-history approach, in which different forms of ecological data about a single system are used to develop conceptual models of complex ecological phenomena. Such an iterative model-building process is a common, but underappreciated, way of understanding how ecological systems work.
authors.affiliation: Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL), P. O. Box 519, Crested Butte, CO, 81224, USA, nickolas.waser@ucr.edu.
authors.forename: Nickolas M
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: Waser
authors.forename: Mary V
authors.initials: MV
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: Daniel T
authors.initials: DT
authors.lastname: Blumstein
authors.forename: S Reneé
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Arózqueta
authors.forename: Betsabé D Castro
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Escobar
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pickens
authors.forename: Alessandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pistoia
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D044822:Biodiversity; D046029:Coyotes / Q000502:physiology*; D003670:Deer / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D005518:Food Preferences / Q000502:physiology; D060434:Herbivory / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000502:physiology*; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1192-202
references.pmid: 23730871
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Dec;14(12):483-488
references.pmid: 10542455
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3249-56
references.pmid: 19535372
references.citation: Science. 2014 Jan 10;343(6167):1241484
references.pmid: 24408439
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1596-604
references.pmid: 18589524
references.citation: Am Nat. 2000 Feb;155(2):141-153
references.pmid: 10686157
references.citation: Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1054-9
references.pmid: 21617069
references.citation: Oecologia. 2004 Feb;138(3):396-404
references.pmid: 14669005
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Dec 22;3(6):620-3
references.pmid: 17925272