title: Investigation of the genetic diversity of domestic Capra hircus breeds reared within an early goat domestication area in Iran.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Iran is an area of particular interest for investigating goat diversity. Archaeological remains indicate early goat domestication (about 10,000 years ago) in the Iranian Zagros Mountains as well as in the high Euphrates valley and southeastern Anatolia. In addition, mitochondrial DNA data of domestic goats and wild ancestors (C. aegagrusor bezoar) suggest a pre-domestication management of wild populations in southern Zagros and central Iranian Plateau. In this study genetic diversity was assessed in seven Iranian native goat breeds, namely Markhoz, Najdi, Taleshi, Khalkhali, Naini, native Abadeh and Turki-Ghashghaei. A total of 317 animals were characterized using 14 microsatellite loci. Two Pakistani goat populations, Pahari and Teddy, were genotyped for comparison.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Iranian goats possess a remarkable genetic diversity (average expected heterozygosity of 0.671 across loci, 10.7 alleles per locus) mainly accounted for by the within-breed component (GST = 5.9%). Positive and highly significant FIS values in the Naini, Turki-Ghashghaei, Abadeh and Markhoz breeds indicate some level of inbreeding in these populations. Multivariate analyses cluster Iranian goats into northern, central and western groups, with the western breeds relatively distinct from the others. Pakistani breeds show some relationship with Iranian populations, even if their position is not consistent across analyses. Gene flow was higher within regions (west, north, central) compared to between regions but particularly low between the western and the other two regions, probably due to the isolating topography of the Zagros mountain range. The Turki-Ghashghaei, Najdi and Abadeh breeds are reared in geographic areas where mtDNA provided evidence of early domestication. These breeds are highly variable, located on basal short branches in the neighbor-joining tree, close to the origin of the principal component analysis plot and, although highly admixed, they are quite distinct from those reared on the western side of the Zagros mountain range.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These observations call for further investigation of the nuclear DNA diversity of these breeds within a much wider geographic context to confirm or re-discuss the current hypothesis (based on maternal lineage data) of an almost exclusive contribution of the eastern Anatolian bezoar to the domestic goat gene pool.
authors.affiliation: Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), North branch, Rasht 41635-4115, Iran. vahidi@abrii.ac.ir.
authors.forename: Seyed Mohammad Farhad
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Vahidi
authors.forename: Ali Reza
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Tarang
authors.forename: Arif-un-Nisa
authors.initials: AU
authors.lastname: Naqvi
authors.forename: Mohsen
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Falahati Anbaran
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Boettcher
authors.forename: Stephane
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Joost
authors.forename: Licia
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Colli
authors.forename: Jose Fernando
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Garcia
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ajmone-Marsan
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D005838:Genotype; D006041:Goats / Q000235:genetics*; D006579:Heterozygote; D007178:Inbreeding; D007492:Iran; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D058974:Phylogeography; D025341:Principal Component Analysis
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Nov;93(5):504-9
references.pmid: 15292911
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
references.pmid: 3447015
references.citation: Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
references.pmid: 19325852
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 1996 May;92(7):832-9
references.pmid: 24166548
references.citation: Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2254-7
references.pmid: 10731145
references.citation: Anim Genet. 2006 Aug;37(4):327-34
references.pmid: 16879341
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 18;105(46):17659-64
references.pmid: 19004765
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 28;9:323
references.pmid: 18662398
references.citation: Anim Genet. 1999 Feb;30(1):36-41
references.pmid: 10050281
references.citation: Ann Hum Genet. 1983 Jul;47(3):253-9
references.pmid: 6614868
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20
references.pmid: 15969739
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Sep;10(9):639-50
references.pmid: 19687804
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Mar;24(3):621-31
references.pmid: 17150975
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2010 May;120(8):1635-51
references.pmid: 20143041
references.citation: Anim Genet. 2011 Aug;42(4):428-31
references.pmid: 20497158
references.citation: Genetics. 1964 Apr;49:725-38
references.pmid: 14156929
references.citation: Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
references.pmid: 28568501
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1983;19(2):153-70
references.pmid: 6571220
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106
references.pmid: 17305863
references.citation: Anim Genet. 1999 Dec;30(6):452-5
references.pmid: 10612235
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 Jan;21(1):1-17
references.pmid: 18028355
references.citation: Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Sep 16;42:36
references.pmid: 20846385
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
references.pmid: 10835412
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
references.pmid: 28563791
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 15;23(14):1801-6
references.pmid: 17485429
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2011 Apr;89(4):893-906
references.pmid: 21415418