title: Sampling plant diversity and rarity at landscape scales: importance of sampling time in species detectability.
abstract: Documenting and estimating species richness at regional or landscape scales has been a major emphasis for conservation efforts, as well as for the development and testing of evolutionary and ecological theory. Rarely, however, are sampling efforts assessed on how they affect detection and estimates of species richness and rarity. In this study, vascular plant richness was sampled in 356 quarter hectare time-unlimited survey plots in the boreal region of northeast Alberta. These surveys consisted of 15,856 observations of 499 vascular plant species (97 considered to be regionally rare) collected by 12 observers over a 2 year period. Average survey time for each quarter-hectare plot was 82 minutes, ranging from 20 to 194 minutes, with a positive relationship between total survey time and total plant richness. When survey time was limited to a 20-minute search, as in other Alberta biodiversity methods, 61 species were missed. Extending the survey time to 60 minutes, reduced the number of missed species to 20, while a 90-minute cut-off time resulted in the loss of 8 species. When surveys were separated by habitat type, 60 minutes of search effort sampled nearly 90% of total observed richness for all habitats. Relative to rare species, time-unlimited surveys had ∼ 65% higher rare plant detections post-20 minutes than during the first 20 minutes of the survey. Although exhaustive sampling was attempted, observer bias was noted among observers when a subsample of plots was re-surveyed by different observers. Our findings suggest that sampling time, combined with sample size and observer effects, should be considered in landscape-scale plant biodiversity surveys.
authors.affiliation: Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Jian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Scott E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Nielsen
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Tess N
authors.initials: TN
authors.lastname: Grainger
authors.affiliation: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Monica
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kohler
authors.affiliation: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Chipchar
authors.affiliation: Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Farr
mesh_terms: D000416:Alberta; D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification*; D018401:Sample Size; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Science. 1992 Nov 13;258(5085):1099-100
references.pmid: 17789079
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):101-18
references.pmid: 7972351
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2011 Mar;21(2):601-7
references.pmid: 21563589
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52762
references.pmid: 23285179
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2011 Aug;9(8):e1001127
references.pmid: 21886479
references.citation: Environ Entomol. 2007 Aug;36(4):766-75
references.pmid: 17716467
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2006 Apr;20(2):501-11
references.pmid: 16903111