title: Brain regions involved in processing facial identity and expression are differentially selective for surface and edge information.
abstract: Although different brain regions are widely considered to be involved in the recognition of facial identity and expression, it remains unclear how these regions process different properties of the visual image. Here, we ask how surface-based reflectance information and edge-based shape cues contribute to the perception and neural representation of facial identity and expression. Contrast-reversal was used to generate images in which normal contrast relationships across the surface of the image were disrupted, but edge information was preserved. In a behavioural experiment, contrast-reversal significantly attenuated judgements of facial identity, but only had a marginal effect on judgements of expression. An fMR-adaptation paradigm was then used to ask how brain regions involved in the processing of identity and expression responded to blocks comprising all normal, all contrast-reversed, or a mixture of normal and contrast-reversed faces. Adaptation in the posterior superior temporal sulcus--a region directly linked with processing facial expression--was relatively unaffected by mixing normal with contrast-reversed faces. In contrast, the response of the fusiform face area--a region linked with processing facial identity--was significantly affected by contrast-reversal. These results offer a new perspective on the reasons underlying the neural segregation of facial identity and expression in which brain regions involved in processing invariant aspects of faces, such as identity, are very sensitive to surface-based cues, whereas regions involved in processing changes in faces, such as expression, are relatively dependent on edge-based cues.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Andrew W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Young
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: timothy.andrews@york.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Andrews
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D005145:Face; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D012938:Social Perception; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Expression; Face; Identity; Vision
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):905-13
references.pmid: 15528090
references.citation: Perception. 1999;28(9):1171-5
references.pmid: 10694965
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):80-4
references.pmid: 10607399
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Apr;107(1-3):293-321
references.pmid: 11388140
references.citation: Perception. 1983;12(2):195-201
references.pmid: 6657426
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Nov 5;45(14):3234-41
references.pmid: 17707444
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
references.pmid: 9151747
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Feb;21(2):467-76
references.pmid: 20576927
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):624-31
references.pmid: 12740580
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Aug;6(8):641-51
references.pmid: 16062171
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 29;101(26):9827-32
references.pmid: 15210952
references.citation: Perception. 2005;34(1):77-86
references.pmid: 15773608
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):308-18
references.pmid: 12814581
references.citation: Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):187-203
references.pmid: 10677037
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Mar;17(3):713-31
references.pmid: 16648452
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233
references.pmid: 10827445
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar;24(3):737-44
references.pmid: 23172771
references.citation: Perception. 2006;35(6):749-59
references.pmid: 16836042
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 May 10;74(3):567-81
references.pmid: 22578507
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):128-36
references.pmid: 24264941
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Sep;92(3):1830-9
references.pmid: 15115795
references.citation: Perception. 2001;30(8):969-81
references.pmid: 11578082
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2013 Feb;23(2):370-7
references.pmid: 22345357
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2005 Nov;51(3):256-84
references.pmid: 16198327
references.citation: Perception. 1994;23(7):803-22
references.pmid: 7845771
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Apr;41(9):1179-208
references.pmid: 11292507
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jan;8(1):107-13
references.pmid: 15592463
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):21164-9
references.pmid: 23213218
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(3):391-405
references.pmid: 18815774
references.citation: Cortex. 1994 Jun;30(2):215-29
references.pmid: 7924346
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):555-62
references.pmid: 15077112
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2009 Nov 10;163(4):1078-91
references.pmid: 19660529
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1986 Aug;77 ( Pt 3):305-27
references.pmid: 3756376
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 3;30(9):3544-52
references.pmid: 20203214