title: How cultural capital, habitus and class influence the responses of older adults to the field of contemporary visual art.
abstract: This article explores the responses of 38 older people to contemporary visual art through the results of a 28-month study entitled,Contemporary Visual Art and Identity Construction: Wellbeing amongst Older People. A framework for the analysis is provided by previous work on the consumption of art and by Bourdieu's constructs of cultural capital, habitus and field. Five groups of older people, with a range of different backgrounds, were taken to galleries and their responses were recorded, transcribed and analysed. It is concluded that participants' responses are influenced by their cultural capital, habitus and class-which, in turn, are affected by their life course experiences. Those who could not recognise the field (e.g., did not view contemporary art as "art") created their own meanings that they associated with the artworks. Evidence indicates that group dynamics and class mobility are likewise important. Participants also used the experience to respond to real or anticipated age-associated deficits.
authors.affiliation: International Centre for Cultural and Heritage Studies, School of Arts and Cultures, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Newman
authors.affiliation: International Centre for Cultural and Heritage Studies, School of Arts and Cultures, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Goulding
authors.affiliation: International Centre for Cultural and Heritage Studies, School of Arts and Cultures, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
authors.forename: Christopher
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Whitehead
keywords: Class; Contemporary visual art; Cultural capital; Habitus; Older people
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2005 Mar;27(2):161-87
references.pmid: 15787774
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1986 Jun;26(3):239-44
references.pmid: 3721229