title: The effects of incidentally learned temporal and spatial predictability on response times and visual fixations during target detection and discrimination.
abstract: Responses are quicker to predictable stimuli than if the time and place of appearance is uncertain. Studies that manipulate target predictability often involve overt cues to speed up response times. However, less is known about whether individuals will exhibit faster response times when target predictability is embedded within the inter-trial relationships. The current research examined the combined effects of spatial and temporal target predictability on reaction time (RT) and allocation of overt attention in a sustained attention task. Participants responded as quickly as possible to stimuli while their RT and eye movements were measured. Target temporal and spatial predictability were manipulated by altering the number of: 1) different time intervals between a response and the next target; and 2) possible spatial locations of the target. The effects of target predictability on target detection (Experiment 1) and target discrimination (Experiment 2) were tested. For both experiments, shorter RTs as target predictability increased across both space and time were found. In addition, the influences of spatial and temporal target predictability on RT and the overt allocation of attention were task dependent; suggesting that effective orienting of attention relies on both spatial and temporal predictability. These results indicate that stimulus predictability can be increased without overt cues and detected purely through inter-trial relationships over the course of repeated stimulus presentations.
authors.affiliation: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
authors.forename: Melissa R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Beck
authors.affiliation: Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America.
authors.forename: S Lee
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Hong
authors.affiliation: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
authors.forename: Amanda E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: van Lamsweerde
authors.affiliation: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
authors.forename: Justin M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Ericson
mesh_terms: D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(2):326-39
references.pmid: 23085375
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2004 Feb;66(2):264-78
references.pmid: 15129748
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 7;25(36):8259-66
references.pmid: 16148233
references.citation: Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):211-21
references.pmid: 21982581
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):460-6
references.pmid: 15200630
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):520-5
references.pmid: 12430835
references.citation: Vision Res. 1988;28(1):95-104
references.pmid: 3414004
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jun;36(1):28-71
references.pmid: 9679076
references.citation: J Consult Psychol. 1956 Oct;20(5):343-50
references.pmid: 13367264
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Dec;36(11):3568-79
references.pmid: 22925196
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1957 Sep;54(3):195-200
references.pmid: 13475646
references.citation: Brain. 1999 Aug;122 ( Pt 8):1507-18
references.pmid: 10430834
references.citation: Front Biosci. 2001 Apr 01;6:D660-71
references.pmid: 11282565
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1489-95
references.pmid: 16360710
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Jun;27(3):664-79
references.pmid: 11424653
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Nov 7;1179:106-18
references.pmid: 17894934
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Feb;17(1):125-41
references.pmid: 1826307
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(13):2325-40
references.pmid: 12417462
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1192-208
references.pmid: 18684642
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):877-83
references.pmid: 15000534
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(12):1317-28
references.pmid: 11566314
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2009 Aug;7(8):e1000166
references.pmid: 19652699
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7426-35
references.pmid: 9736662
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
references.pmid: 17835457
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91
references.pmid: 13174710
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1631-47
references.pmid: 2635486
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Nov;134(4):552-64
references.pmid: 16316291
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 1986 Apr;5(2):131-62
references.pmid: 3964469
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):972-9
references.pmid: 18018979
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Mar 3;1076(1):116-28
references.pmid: 16516173
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1953 Mar;45(3):188-96
references.pmid: 13052851