title: An exploratory, population-based, mixed-methods program evaluation of user satisfaction of services provided by a regional extension center (REC).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate user satisfaction among practices receiving services provided by the Arizona Regional Extension Center (REC).
  
  
  METHODS
  This program evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach including: 1) a mail-based survey targeting all 489 REC member practices; and 2) a series of telephone-based focus groups using a convenience sample of rural and urban REC member practices. Targeted respondents were key contacts who handle interactions with the REC at each practice. Program evaluators at the University of Arizona and experts at Arizona Health-e Connection (AzHeC) created the questionnaires, focus group script, participant invitation and follow up documents via a collaborative process. Regression and Rasch analyses were used to identify key factors associated with satisfaction with REC and to assess questionnaire validity, respectively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Responses from both the focus groups and survey revealed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the current services, despite the presence of satisfaction gaps between practices of various characteristics: respondents that were clinicians, practices using web-based electronic health record systems (EHRs), and practices that had achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use had a higher level of satisfaction compared with their respective counterparts. Focus group participants provided suggestions for improving REC services.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most respondents reported being satisfied with REC services. Specialized representatives may be needed for practices at different stages of Meaningful Use to further improve REC satisfaction in order to facilitate more efficient adoption of EHRs.
authors.affiliation: The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy , Tucson, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tang
authors.affiliation: Arizona Health-e Connection , Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rutala
authors.affiliation: Arizona Health-e Connection , Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ihde
authors.affiliation: Arizona Health-e Connection , Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bills
authors.affiliation: The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy , Tucson, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mollon
authors.affiliation: The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy , Tucson, Arizona, United States.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Warholak
mesh_terms: D001130:Arizona; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D003625:Data Collection; D003710:Demography; D017144:Focus Groups; D006268:Health Facilities; D006296:Health Services; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D015397:Program Evaluation
keywords: Health information technology; meaningful use; mixed-methods study; regional extension center; user satisfaction
references.citation: NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Jul;(98):1-8
references.pmid: 23050588
references.citation: JAMA. 2010 Oct 20;304(15):1709-10
references.pmid: 20959581
references.citation: Health Policy. 2009 May;90(2-3):239-46
references.pmid: 19038472
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w282-93
references.pmid: 19174390
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(1):87-91
references.pmid: 2319285
references.citation: Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):883-91, quiz 891.e1
references.pmid: 19152911
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):647-54
references.pmid: 20368594
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Apr;29(4):601-6
references.pmid: 20368588
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):357-60
references.pmid: 19275990
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
references.pmid: 16702590
references.citation: J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85-106
references.pmid: 11997586
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1214-9
references.pmid: 20530358
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):666-70
references.pmid: 21079224
references.citation: Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49-79
references.pmid: 10125117
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):501-4
references.pmid: 20647183