title: What decides the suspicion of acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain patients?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Physicians assessing chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED) base the likelihood of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) mainly on ECG, symptom history and blood markers of myocardial injury. Among these, the ECG has been stated to be the most important diagnostic tool. We aimed to analyze the relative contributions of these three diagnostic modalities to the ED physicians' evaluation of ACS likelihood in clinical practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  1151 consecutive ED chest pain patients were prospectively included. The ED physician's subjective assessment of the patient's likelihood of ACS (obvious ACS, strong, vague or no suspicion of ACS), the symptoms and the ECG were recorded on a special form. The ED TnT value was retrieved from the medical records. Frequency tables and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the contributions of the diagnostic tests to the level of ACS suspicion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Symptoms determined whether the physician had any suspicion of ACS (odds ratio, OR 526 for symptoms typical compared to not suspicious of ACS) since neither ECG nor TnT contributed significantly (ORs not significantly different from 1) to this assessment. ACS was suspected in only one in ten patients with symptoms not suspicious of ACS. Symptoms were also more important (OR 620 for typical symptoms) than ECG (OR 31 for ischemic ECG) and TnT (OR 3.4 for a positive TnT) for the assessment of obvious ACS/strong suspicion versus vague/no suspicion. Of the patients with ST-elevation on ECG, 71% were considered to have an obvious ACS, as opposed to only 6% of those with symptoms typical of ACS and 10% of those with a positive TnT.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The ED physicians used symptoms as the most important assessment tool and applied primarily the symptoms to determine the level of ACS suspicion and to rule out ACS. The ECG was primarily used to rule in ACS. The TnT level played a minor role for the assessment of ACS likelihood. Further studies regarding ACS prediction based on symptoms may help improve decision-making in ED patients with possible ACS.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Halmstad Hospital, Halland, Sweden. alexander.kamali@regionhalland.se.
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kamali
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Söderholm
authors.forename: Ulf
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Ekelund
mesh_terms: D054058:Acute Coronary Syndrome / Q000150:complications* / Q000175:diagnosis*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000097:blood; D002637:Chest Pain / Q000209:etiology*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D020107:Troponin T / Q000097:blood*
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers; D020107:Troponin T
references.citation: Clin Chem. 2010 Apr;56(4):642-50
references.pmid: 20167697
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;9(3):203-8
references.pmid: 11874776
references.citation: BMC Emerg Med. 2002 Oct 3;2(1):1
references.pmid: 12361481
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Feb;58(547):105-11
references.pmid: 18307844
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 16;139(12):987-95
references.pmid: 14678918
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 2000 Mar 9;85(5A):32B-39B
references.pmid: 11076129
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2345-53
references.pmid: 14581255
references.citation: Lakartidningen. 2005 Jul 11-24;102(28-29):2073-7
references.pmid: 16097178
references.citation: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006 May;26(3):151-6
references.pmid: 16640509
references.citation: Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003 Feb;21(1):27-59
references.pmid: 12630730
references.citation: Emerg Med J. 2010 Dec;27(12):896-902
references.pmid: 20682952
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 20;58(13):1340-2
references.pmid: 21920262
references.citation: Heart. 2009 Jun;95(11):888-94
references.pmid: 19246481
references.citation: JAMA. 1998 Oct 14;280(14):1256-63
references.pmid: 9786377
references.citation: Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2543-9
references.pmid: 14610011
references.citation: Circulation. 2007 Nov 27;116(22):2634-53
references.pmid: 17951284
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;73(8):550-3
references.pmid: 8147299
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1187-95
references.pmid: 10770985
references.citation: Circulation. 1997 Sep 16;96(6):1798-802
references.pmid: 9323064
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):537-43
references.pmid: 18616439
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2000 May;35(5):521-5
references.pmid: 10783419
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;40(2):180-6
references.pmid: 12140497
references.citation: Emerg Med J. 2012 Aug;29(8):644-9
references.pmid: 21810926
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;58(6):501-7
references.pmid: 21802776
references.citation: Arq Bras Cardiol. 2000 Jan;74(1):13-29
references.pmid: 10904517
references.citation: J Electrocardiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):58-63
references.pmid: 18804783
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2623-9
references.pmid: 16304077
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 1996 Aug;17(8):1181-91
references.pmid: 8869859
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 22;54(13):1173-5
references.pmid: 19761939
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69
references.pmid: 10987628