title: Neural correlates of moral judgments in first- and third-person perspectives: implications for neuroethics and beyond.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There appears to be an inconsistency in experimental paradigms used in fMRI research on moral judgments. As stimuli, moral dilemmas or moral statements/ pictures that induce emotional reactions are usually employed; a main difference between these stimuli is the perspective of the participants reflecting first-person (moral dilemmas) or third-person perspective (moral reactions). The present study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in order to investigate the neural correlates of moral judgments in either first- or third-person perspective.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Our results indicate that different neural mechanisms appear to be involved in these perspectives. Although conjunction analysis revealed common activation in the anterior medial prefrontal cortex, third person-perspective elicited unique activations in hippocampus and visual cortex. The common activation can be explained by the role the anterior medial prefrontal cortex may play in integrating different information types and also by its involvement in theory of mind. Our results also indicate that the so-called "actor-observer bias" affects moral evaluation in the third-person perspective, possibly due to the involvement of the hippocampus. We suggest two possible ways in which the hippocampus may support the process of moral judgment: by the engagement of episodic memory and its role in understanding the behaviors and emotions of others.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We posit that these findings demonstrate that first or third person perspectives in moral cognition involve distinct neural processes, that are important to different aspects of moral judgments. These results are important to a deepened understanding of neural correlates of moral cognition-the so-called "first tradition" of neuroethics, with the caveat that any results must be interpreted and employed with prudence, so as to heed neuroethics "second tradition" that sustains the pragmatic evaluation of outcomes, capabilities and limitations of neuroscientific techniques and technologies.
authors.forename: Mihai
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Avram
authors.forename: Kristina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hennig-Fast
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Bao
authors.forename: Ernst
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Pöppel
authors.forename: Maximilian
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Reiser
authors.forename: Janusch
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Blautzik
authors.affiliation: Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. giordano@grp.hwz.uni-muenchen.de.
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Giordano
authors.forename: Evgeny
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Gutyrchik
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016477:Artifacts; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods*; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D035481:Retrospective Moral Judgment
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77
references.pmid: 16552413
references.citation: Brain. 2012 Jul;135(Pt 7):2006-21
references.pmid: 22334584
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):799-809
references.pmid: 16276356
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Aug 15;20(16):6225-31
references.pmid: 10934272
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):77-83
references.pmid: 12584026
references.citation: Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):564-83
references.pmid: 16399806
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):988-99
references.pmid: 15298786
references.citation: Brain Res. 2002 May 31;938(1-2):92-7
references.pmid: 12031540
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Jan;6(1):138-48
references.pmid: 20231177
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):331-48
references.pmid: 12030820
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2013 Feb 8;534:128-32
references.pmid: 23262080
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8
references.pmid: 11557895
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 30;96(7):4034-9
references.pmid: 10097158
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Mar;5(3):184-94
references.pmid: 14976518
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):243-9
references.pmid: 11994756
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1887-96
references.pmid: 19487191
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1813-22
references.pmid: 20226799
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Apr;34(4):945-55
references.pmid: 22012639
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Jul 3;35(1):21-3
references.pmid: 12123605
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Dec;16(10):1746-72
references.pmid: 15701226
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jan;7(1):38-42
references.pmid: 12517357
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):59-66
references.pmid: 23159344
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Dec;1(3):203-13
references.pmid: 18985107
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):517-523
references.pmid: 12475712
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):467-70
references.pmid: 9624001
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
references.pmid: 11771995
references.citation: Perspect Biol Med. 2011 Summer;54(3):367-80
references.pmid: 21857127
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 19;26(16):4415-25
references.pmid: 16624961
references.citation: Monist. 1976 Apr;59(2):204-17
references.pmid: 11662247
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Jun;17(11):2475-80
references.pmid: 12814380
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 May;25(5):670-84
references.pmid: 23249349
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Oct;36(9):2143-6
references.pmid: 22813993
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(1):1-10
references.pmid: 21590587
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1257
references.pmid: 18033875
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1669-76
references.pmid: 20817106
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):171-80
references.pmid: 12526782
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2004 Jan;16(1):1-38
references.pmid: 15006021
references.citation: Neuron. 2000 Sep;27(3):623-33
references.pmid: 11055443
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 May;4(5):546-50
references.pmid: 11319565
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004 Nov;23(3):967-74
references.pmid: 15528097
references.citation: Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Nov;3(6):561-3
references.pmid: 21331239
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1789-801
references.pmid: 20211193
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):527-33
references.pmid: 14643368
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2007;2(3-4):336-52
references.pmid: 18633822