title: SUPPORTING CHILDREN IN U.S. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: Descriptive and Attitudinal Data From a National Survey of Victim/Witness Assistants.
abstract: We conducted a national survey of 786 victim/witness assistants (VWAs) to provide descriptive and attitudinal information about support person use in U.S. legal proceedings involving children. VWAs (N= 414) from 46 states returned completed surveys (response rate = 53%). Prosecutor-based VWAs or parents/guardians most frequently served as support persons. One support person was almost always or often used with child victims and/or witnesses of all ages. Support persons were extremely common in cases involving child sexual abuse, physical abuse, neglect, and adult domestic violence. Overall, support persons provided more informational than emotional support. The most common informational support was to provide referrals to community resources, conduct courtroom visit/orientation, and disseminate relevant procedural information. The most common emotional support was to accompany the child to trial. Support persons rarely or never questioned children directly during investigative interviews or in court. Respondents believed support persons decrease children's stress and increase accuracy and credibility; however, this effect varied as a function of who provided support, child age, case type, and type of emotional or informational support. Respondents believed that support person presence at trial probably does not prejudice jurors against defendants. These survey data provide a benchmark for legal professionals and a foundation for future social scientific research examining the effects of support person use on children.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge.
authors.forename: Bradley D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: McAuliff
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge.
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Nicholson
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge.
authors.forename: Diana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Amarilio
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, California State University, Northridge.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ravanshenas
keywords: alternative testimony; child witness; support persons; victim/witness assistants
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 1998 Apr;22(2):165-203
references.pmid: 9566121
references.citation: Child Care Health Dev. 2005 Mar;31(2):233-43
references.pmid: 15715702
references.citation: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;38(12):1544-50
references.pmid: 10596255
references.citation: Med J Aust. 1987 Dec 7-21;147(11-12):544-8
references.pmid: 3696041
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Oct;51(5):783-5
references.pmid: 6630696
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(5):1-142; discussion 143-61
references.pmid: 1470193
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Apr;72(4):235-70
references.pmid: 10074380
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(4):262-90
references.pmid: 12470961
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2005;70(2):vii, 1-128
references.pmid: 16159360
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1989 Aug;80 ( Pt 3):285-97
references.pmid: 2790389
references.citation: Child Abuse Negl. 1993 Sep-Oct;17(5):613-22
references.pmid: 8221216
references.citation: Child Maltreat. 2010 Aug;15(3):255-60
references.pmid: 20395223
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):97-117
references.pmid: 19156680
references.citation: Child Maltreat. 2001 Nov;6(4):344-52
references.pmid: 11675817
references.citation: Psychol Crime Law. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):27-47
references.pmid: 22523466
references.citation: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;46(2):162-70
references.pmid: 17242619
references.citation: Violence Vict. 1996 Spring;11(1):71-91
references.pmid: 8870217
references.citation: Child Abuse Negl. 1987;11(2):267-72
references.pmid: 3594286
references.citation: Child Maltreat. 2003 Aug;8(3):204-10
references.pmid: 12934637