title: Use of apparent diffusion coefficient values for diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors.
abstract: We prospectively compared the ability of neuroradiologists to diagnose medulloblastoma with novice raters using only apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values measured on ADC maps. One hundred and three pediatric patients with pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging scans showing a posterior fossa tumor with histological verification were retrospectively identified from a ten-year period at a tertiary care medical center. A single observer measured the lowest ADC values in all tumors to determine the mean minimum ADC (ADCmin) value that provided greatest accuracy in distinguishing medulloblastomas from other tumors, which was determined to be 0.66×10(-3) mm(2)/s. Imaging studies, including ADC maps, from 90 patients were provided to two neuroradiologists, who provided a diagnosis, which was later dichotomized as medulloblastoma or other. Two medical students measured ADCmin within tumors and those with ADCmin < 0.66×10(-3) mm(2)/s were recorded as medulloblastoma; any other value was recorded as other. Diagnostic accuracy was measured. ADCmin values allowed a correct identification of lesions as either medulloblastoma or other in 91% of cases. After diagnoses by the two neuroradiologists were categorized as either medulloblastoma or other, their diagnoses were correct in 90% and 84% of cases, respectively. In 19 cases, at least one neuroradiologist was incorrect; the addition of ADC values to clinical interpretation would have allowed a correct diagnosis in 63% of such cases. Diagnostic accuracy based on ADC values by medical students was comparable to that of subspecialty-trained neuroradiologists. Our findings suggest that the addition of ADC values to standard film interpretation may improve the diagnostic rate for these tumors.
authors.affiliation: Duke University School of Medicine; Durham, NC, USA - James.provenzale@duke.edu.
authors.forename: Theodore
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pierce
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center; Durham, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Peter G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Kranz
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center; Durham, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Christopher
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roth
authors.affiliation: Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School; Singapore.
authors.forename: Dalun
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Leong
authors.affiliation: Duke University School of Medicine; Durham, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wei
authors.affiliation: Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School; Singapore - Departments of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Oncology and Biomedical Engineering, Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors.forename: James M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Provenzale
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001254:Astrocytoma / Q000473:pathology; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology; D002528:Cerebellar Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D038524:Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004806:Ependymoma / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D015192:Infratentorial Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D008297:Male; D008527:Medulloblastoma / Q000473:pathology*; D015588:Observer Variation; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies
keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient; children; posterior fossa; tumors
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan;35(1):32-47
references.pmid: 21989968
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;31(6):1331-8
references.pmid: 20512884
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Oct;31(9):1613-6
references.pmid: 20538820
references.citation: Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Nov;22(11):1435-9
references.pmid: 17021722
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Nov;29(10):1872-7
references.pmid: 18719036
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 1999 Jul;29(7):524-6
references.pmid: 10398789
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul;19(7):794-800
references.pmid: 22513110
references.citation: J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar;34(1):49-58
references.pmid: 17316798
references.citation: Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
references.pmid: 843571
references.citation: Neurol Res. 2009 Nov;31(9):940-6
references.pmid: 19138469
references.citation: Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Sep;22(9):1083-92
references.pmid: 9737241
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Aug;177(2):449-54
references.pmid: 11461881
references.citation: J Neuroradiol. 2004 Jun;31(3):234-7
references.pmid: 15356452
references.citation: J Int Med Res. 2011;39(3):912-9
references.pmid: 21819724
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):839-46
references.pmid: 17032910
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):848-54
references.pmid: 17951348
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):447-57
references.pmid: 21918916
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):177-83
references.pmid: 12091680
references.citation: Neuroradiology. 2003 Apr;45(4):212-9
references.pmid: 12687303
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):985-91
references.pmid: 15833979
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jun-Jul;27(6):1362-9
references.pmid: 16775298