title: Redistribution of health care costs after the adoption of positron emission tomography among medicare beneficiaries with non-small-cell lung cancer, 1998-2005.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Treatment patterns and cost implications of increased positron emission tomography imaging use since Medicare approval in 1998 are not well understood. We examined rates of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and inpatient and total health care costs between 1998 and 2005 among Medicare beneficiaries with non-small-cell lung cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients in this retrospective cohort study were 51,374 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer between 1996 and 2005. The main outcome measures were receipt of surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and inpatient and total health care costs within 1 year of diagnosis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between 1996-1997 and 2004-2005, the proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection decreased from 29% to 25%, the proportion receiving radiation therapy decreased from 49% to 43%, and inpatient costs decreased from $28,900 to $26,900. The proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy increased from 25% to 40% and total costs increased from $47,300 to $52,200 (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Changes in use and costs remained after adjustment for shifting demographic characteristics during the study period.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Adoption of positron emission tomography between 1998 and 2005 was accompanied by decreases in rates of surgery and radiotherapy and in short-term inpatient costs among Medicare beneficiaries with non-small-cell lung cancer, although there was an increase in chemotherapy and overall costs.
authors.affiliation: *Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; †Department of Health Policy and Administration, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‡Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; §Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; and ‖Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
authors.forename: Michaela A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Dinan
authors.forename: Lesley H
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: Curtis
authors.forename: William R
authors.initials: WR
authors.lastname: Carpenter
authors.forename: Andrea K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Biddle
authors.forename: Amy P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Abernethy
authors.forename: Edward F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Patz
authors.forename: Kevin A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Schulman
authors.forename: Morris
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Weinberger
mesh_terms: D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy; D008297:Male; D006278:Medicare; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014481:United States