title: The politics of color: preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue.
abstract: The present study reveals that Election Day differentially affects the color preferences of US Republicans and Democrats. Voters' preferences for Republican red and Democratic blue were assessed, along with several distractor colors, on and around the 2010 interim and 2012 presidential elections. On non-Election Days, Republicans and Democrats preferred Republican red equally, and Republicans actually preferred Democratic blue more than Democrats did. On Election Day, however, Republicans' and Democrats' color preferences changed to become more closely aligned with their own party's colors. Republicans liked Republican red more than Democrats did, and no longer preferred Democratic blue more than Democrats did. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that color preferences are determined by people's preferences for correspondingly colored objects/entities (Palmer & Schloss in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:8877-8882, 2010). They further suggest that color preferences are calculated at a given moment, depending on which color-object associations are currently most activated or salient. Color preferences are thus far more dynamic and context-dependent than has previously been believed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, 190 Thayer Street, Providence, RI, 02912, USA, karenschloss@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Karen B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Schloss
authors.forename: Stephen E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Palmer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001244:Association; D001290:Attitude; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D003116:Color; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D014481:United States
references.citation: Perception. 1982;10(6):651-66
references.pmid: 7110879
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1246-7
references.pmid: 17828253
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1959 Dec;72:487-502
references.pmid: 13830144
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82
references.pmid: 20421475
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:77-107
references.pmid: 23020642
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):8836-41
references.pmid: 23671106
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):339-75
references.pmid: 12784934
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2011 Apr 26;21(8):677-80
references.pmid: 21474316
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):190-7
references.pmid: 22302645
references.citation: Science. 2008 Sep 19;321(5896):1667-70
references.pmid: 18801995
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):847-57
references.pmid: 22829343
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504
references.pmid: 21380587
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):935-43
references.pmid: 23616112