title: Development of the first-mention bias.
abstract: In many contexts, pronouns are interpreted as referring to the character mentioned first in the previous sentence, an effect called the 'first-mention bias'. While adults can rapidly use the first-mention bias to guide pronoun interpretation, it is unclear when this bias emerges during development. Curiously, experiments with children between two and three years old show successful use of order of mention, while experiments with older children (four to five years old) do not. While this could suggest U-shaped development, it could also reflect differences in the methodologies employed. We show that children can indeed use first-mention information, but do so too slowly to have been detected in previous work reporting null results. Comparison across the present and previously published studies suggests that the speed at which children deploy first-mention information increases greatly during the preschool years.
authors.affiliation: Harvard University.
authors.forename: Joshua K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Hartshorne
authors.affiliation: Harvard University.
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Nappa
authors.affiliation: Harvard University.
authors.forename: Jesse
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Snedeker
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Apr;16(4):260-4
references.pmid: 15828971
references.citation: Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Mar 05;6:8
references.pmid: 22403538
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1990 Jul;19(4):245-64
references.pmid: 2231480
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):543-54
references.pmid: 26168111
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1632-4
references.pmid: 7777863
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 Jan;86(3):283-315
references.pmid: 12485741
references.citation: J Semant. 2008;25(1):1-44
references.pmid: 22923856
references.citation: Cognition. 2000 Jul 14;76(1):B13-26
references.pmid: 10822045
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):98-116
references.pmid: 16420121
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):283-94
references.pmid: 6621344
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
references.pmid: 19884961
references.citation: Lingua. 2007 Nov;117(11):1959-1987
references.pmid: 18978930
references.citation: Child Dev. 1968 Jun;39(2):433-48
references.pmid: 5649958
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):313-23
references.pmid: 7791600
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1971 Apr;11(2):244-50
references.pmid: 5103750
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2010 May;60(3):190-217
references.pmid: 20189552
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2010;57(1):5-16
references.pmid: 20176549
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1990 May;19(3):191-210
references.pmid: 2231478
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(4):1-182
references.pmid: 1518508