title: Individual differences in the balance of GABA to glutamate in pFC predict the ability to select among competing options.
abstract: Individuals vary greatly in their ability to select one item or response when presented with a multitude of options. Here we investigate the neural underpinnings of these individual differences. Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we found that the balance of inhibitory versus excitatory neurotransmitters in pFC predicts the ability to select among task-relevant options in two language production tasks. The greater an individual's concentration of GABA relative to glutamate in the lateral pFC, the more quickly he or she could select a relevant word from among competing options. This outcome is consistent with our computational modeling of this task [Snyder, H. R., Hutchison, N., Nyhus, E., Curran, T., Banich, M. T., O'Reilly, R. C., et al. Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 107, 16483-16488, 2010], which predicts that greater net inhibition in pFC increases the efficiency of resolving competition among task-relevant options. Moreover, the association with the GABA/glutamate ratio was specific to selection and was not observed for executive function ability in general. These findings are the first to link the balance of excitatory and inhibitory neural transmission in pFC to specific aspects of executive function.
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado, Boulder.
authors.forename: Alejandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: de la Vega
authors.forename: Mark S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Hannah R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Snyder
authors.forename: Debra
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Singel
authors.forename: Yuko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Munakata
authors.forename: Marie T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Banich
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D018698:Glutamic Acid / Q000378:metabolism*; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D009682:Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D014825:Vocabulary; D055815:Young Adult; D005680:gamma-Aminobutyric Acid / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D018698:Glutamic Acid; D005680:gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2608-23
references.pmid: 24742155
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Sep;26(6):527-67
references.pmid: 20183014
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Feb 23;1256:92-100
references.pmid: 19111526
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14792-7
references.pmid: 9405692
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):201-225
references.pmid: 18473654
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1993 Dec;30(6):672-9
references.pmid: 8139448
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Jul;13(7):825-7
references.pmid: 20512136
references.citation: Commun Integr Biol. 2011 Sep;4(5):573-5
references.pmid: 22046466
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):869-78
references.pmid: 18548064
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):745-50
references.pmid: 23349060
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:28-34
references.pmid: 23370056
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16483-8
references.pmid: 20813959
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):453-9
references.pmid: 21889391
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Sep;75(5):1182-9
references.pmid: 16922854
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Oct 12;20(19):1779-85
references.pmid: 20888227
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1124-40
references.pmid: 11009248
references.citation: J Physiol. 1999 Jun 1;517 ( Pt 2):591-7
references.pmid: 10332104
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):302-5
references.pmid: 7815657
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1980 Nov;8(6):631-42
references.pmid: 7219183
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;1(2):137-60
references.pmid: 12467110
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Jan;173(1):119-23
references.pmid: 19049440
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Apr;59(4):745-59
references.pmid: 16707360
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1140-57
references.pmid: 19413479
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):167-76
references.pmid: 12747504
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
references.pmid: 11283309
references.citation: Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(7):495-517
references.pmid: 17117412
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1083-8
references.pmid: 19001571
references.citation: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14
references.pmid: 22773897
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9910-8
references.pmid: 20660273
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;25(7):1032-8
references.pmid: 17707165
references.citation: Eur J Radiol. 2010 Mar;73(3):526-31
references.pmid: 19201120
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:43-52
references.pmid: 23246994
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3470-82
references.pmid: 21452939
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 1998 Oct;11(6):266-72
references.pmid: 9802468
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1184-91
references.pmid: 11127836
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2006 Feb;18(2):283-328
references.pmid: 16378516
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2004 Jan;18(1):163-73
references.pmid: 14744199
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):485-94
references.pmid: 10627624
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Jun 10;29(23):7513-7518
references.pmid: 19515919
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr;20(2):242-50
references.pmid: 20381337
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):995-1006
references.pmid: 11138768