title: Lord's paradox in a continuous setting and a regression artifact in numerical cognition research.
abstract: In this paper we review, and elaborate on, the literature on a regression artifact related to Lord's paradox in a continuous setting. Specifically, the question is whether a continuous property of individuals predicts improvement from training between a pretest and a posttest. If the pretest score is included as a covariate, regression to the mean will lead to biased results if two critical conditions are satisfied: (1) the property is correlated with pretest scores and (2) pretest scores include random errors. We discuss how these conditions apply to the analysis in a published experimental study, the authors of which concluded that linearity of children's estimations of numerical magnitudes predicts arithmetic learning from a training program. However, the two critical conditions were clearly met in that study. In a reanalysis we find that the bias in the method can fully account for the effect found in the original study. In other words, data are consistent with the null hypothesis that numerical magnitude estimations are unrelated to arithmetic learning.
authors.affiliation: School of Education, Culture and Communication, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden; Centre for the Study of Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Kimmo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Eriksson
authors.affiliation: Mathematical Statistics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
authors.forename: Olle
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Häggström
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical
references.citation: Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):1016-31
references.pmid: 18717904
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Sep 04;8(9):e73364
references.pmid: 24023863
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 2013 Nov;48(6):895-922
references.pmid: 26745598
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1967 Nov;68(5):304-5
references.pmid: 6062585