title: Negatively-biased credulity and the cultural evolution of beliefs.
abstract: The functions of cultural beliefs are often opaque to those who hold them. Accordingly, to benefit from cultural evolution's ability to solve complex adaptive problems, learners must be credulous. However, credulity entails costs, including susceptibility to exploitation, and effort wasted due to false beliefs. One determinant of the optimal level of credulity is the ratio between the costs of two types of errors: erroneous incredulity (failing to believe information that is true) and erroneous credulity (believing information that is false). This ratio can be expected to be asymmetric when information concerns hazards, as the costs of erroneous incredulity will, on average, exceed the costs of erroneous credulity; no equivalent asymmetry characterizes information concerning benefits. Natural selection can therefore be expected to have crafted learners' minds so as to be more credulous toward information concerning hazards. This negatively-biased credulity extends general negativity bias, the adaptive tendency for negative events to be more salient than positive events. Together, these biases constitute attractors that should shape cultural evolution via the aggregated effects of learners' differential retention and transmission of information. In two studies in the U.S., we demonstrate the existence of negatively-biased credulity, and show that it is most pronounced in those who believe the world to be dangerous, individuals who may constitute important nodes in cultural transmission networks. We then document the predicted imbalance in cultural content using a sample of urban legends collected from the Internet and a sample of supernatural beliefs obtained from ethnographies of a representative collection of the world's cultures, showing that beliefs about hazards predominate in both.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology and Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Daniel M T
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Fessler
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Anne C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Pisor
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
authors.forename: Carlos David
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Navarrete
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003468:Cultural Evolution; D003469:Culture; D005007:Ethnology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66
references.pmid: 16430328
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Nov 15;162(10):1024-31
references.pmid: 16177140
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2006 May 6;30(3):531-53
references.pmid: 21702824
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;28(8):474-81
references.pmid: 23787087
references.citation: Am Ann Deaf. 1995 Jul;140(3):271-8
references.pmid: 8651068
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;43(Pt 4):605-23
references.pmid: 15601511
references.citation: Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):58-62
references.pmid: 18832637
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2006 Dec;29(6):595-613; discussion 613-50
references.pmid: 17918647
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 7;276(1654):31-7
references.pmid: 18782752
references.citation: Hum Nat. 2007 Mar;18(1):35-46
references.pmid: 26181743
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2006 Aug;97(Pt 3):405-23
references.pmid: 16848951
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2012;59(1):38-46
references.pmid: 21768064
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):891-3
references.pmid: 21690315
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):81-91
references.pmid: 10653507
references.citation: Hum Nat. 1990 Sep;1(3):261-89
references.pmid: 24222085
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):1028-41
references.pmid: 11761305
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2003 Aug;23(4):717-26
references.pmid: 12926565
references.citation: Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4
references.pmid: 20299588
references.citation: Am Ann Deaf. 1992 Mar;137(1):44-7
references.pmid: 1605100
references.citation: Risk Anal. 2001 Feb;21(1):199-206
references.pmid: 11332549
references.citation: Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
references.pmid: 7455683
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 May;935:75-85
references.pmid: 11411177
references.citation: Cognition. 2012 Oct;125(1):37-48
references.pmid: 22832179