title: Assessing the quality of record keeping for cesarean deliveries: results from a multicenter retrospective record review in five low-income countries.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Reliable, timely information is the foundation of decision making for functioning health systems; the quality of decision making rests on quality data. Routine monitoring, reporting, and review of cesarean section (CS) indications, decision-to-delivery intervals, and partograph use are important elements of quality improvement for maternity services.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 2009 and 2010, a sample of CS records from calendar year 2008 was reviewed at nine facilities in Bangladesh, Guinea, Mali, Niger, and Uganda. Data from patient records and hospital registers were collected on key aspects of care such as timing of key events, indications, partograph use, maternal and fetal outcomes. Qualitative interviews were conducted with key informants at all study sites to provide contextual background about CS services and record keeping practices.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 2,941 records were reviewed and 57 key informant interviews were conducted. Patient record-keeping systems were of varying quality across study sites: at five sites, more than 20% of records could not be located. Across all sites, patient files were missing key aspects of CS care: timing of key events (e.g., examination, decision to perform CS), administration of prophylactic antibiotics, maternal complications, and maternal and fetal outcomes. Rates of partograph use were low at six sites: 0 to 23.9% of patient files at these sites had a completed partograph on file, and among those found, 2.1% to 65.1% were completed correctly. Information on fetal outcomes was missing in up to 40% of patient files.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Deficits in the quality of CS patient records across a broad range of health facilities in low-resource settings in four sub-Saharan Africa countries and Bangladesh indicate an urgent need to improve record keeping.
authors.affiliation: EngenderHealth, 440 Ninth Ave,, New York, NY 10001, USA. landry.evie@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Evelyn
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Landry
authors.forename: Celia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Pett
authors.forename: Renee
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Fiorentino
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ruminjo
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Mattison
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001459:Bangladesh / Q000453:epidemiology; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D016701:Guinea / Q000453:epidemiology; D006753:Hospital Records / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D008302:Mali / Q000453:epidemiology; D008428:Maternal Mortality / Q000639:trends; D009548:Niger / Q000453:epidemiology; D011203:Poverty; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014454:Uganda / Q000453:epidemiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):e14566
references.pmid: 21283801
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
references.pmid: 8042057
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):490-9
references.pmid: 20071021
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2007 Apr;11(1):22-32
references.pmid: 17982945
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Dec;90(12):1423-7
references.pmid: 21682698
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;107(3):191-7
references.pmid: 19782977
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001368
references.pmid: 23335862
references.citation: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jun;52(2):256-69
references.pmid: 19407533
references.citation: BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71
references.pmid: 21067593
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900
references.pmid: 15752534
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Apr;90(4):295-304
references.pmid: 21306336
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):693-711
references.pmid: 24553167
references.citation: Birth. 2008 Sep;35(3):204-11
references.pmid: 18844646
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Nov 17;335(7628):1025
references.pmid: 17977819
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1819-29
references.pmid: 16753484
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 09;9:17
references.pmid: 19426513
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 10;(7):CD005461
references.pmid: 23843091
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Mar 15;12:14
references.pmid: 22420615
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
references.pmid: 22696318
references.citation: BJOG. 2012 Apr;119(5):605-13
references.pmid: 22329559
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Dec;24(6):564-7
references.pmid: 22798693