title: Direct suppression as a mechanism for controlling unpleasant memories in daily life.
abstract: Suppressing unwanted memories can impair their later recall. Recent work shows that this forgetting is achieved by at least two mechanisms supported by distinct neural systems: thought substitution and direct suppression (Benoit & Anderson, 2012). Here, we examined whether direct suppression, thought to be achieved by down-regulation of hippocampal activity, can disrupt memory of aversive scenes, and, if so, whether this disruption is linked to people's perception of their ability to control intrusive thoughts. We presented participants with strong naturalistic reminders to aversive scenes and asked them to either covertly retrieve or directly suppress the associated scenes. Later, participants were cued with the reminders and asked to recall the scenes in detail. Direct suppression reduced recall probability of the scenes and also reduced the number of details recalled, even when scenes were remembered. Deficits in recall arose for minor details but also for details central to each scene's gist. Participants with higher self-perceived control abilities over intrusive thoughts showed greater forgetting than did those reporting lower levels of control. These findings suggest that inhibitory processes underlying direct suppression can disrupt retention of aversive visual memories and link those processes to individual differences in control over intrusive thoughts in everyday life. These findings reinforce the possibility that inhibition may be less efficient in people likely to acquire posttraumatic stress disorder in the wake of a traumatic experience.
authors.affiliation: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.
authors.forename: Charlotte S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Küpper
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
authors.forename: Roland G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Benoit
authors.affiliation: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Dalgleish
authors.affiliation: MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.
authors.forename: Michael C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Anderson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology / Q000502:physiology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Nebr Symp Motiv. 2012;58:53-120
references.pmid: 22303764
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Dec;52(12):1048-60
references.pmid: 7492257
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Dec;48(4):726-37
references.pmid: 19563900
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jul 13;317(5835):215-9
references.pmid: 17626877
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):573-8
references.pmid: 14629688
references.citation: Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(1):16-28
references.pmid: 19235599
references.citation: Clin Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;1(2):163-169
references.pmid: 25161828
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):441-7
references.pmid: 16683933
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2010 Jan;117(1):210-32
references.pmid: 20063969
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2013;27(6):1122-31
references.pmid: 23387794
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2008 Apr;46(4):496-513
references.pmid: 18328465
references.citation: Memory. 2013;21(6):675-94
references.pmid: 23301998
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Mar;127(3):623-35
references.pmid: 18242571
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14325-9
references.pmid: 18787113
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;68(7):701-13
references.pmid: 21727254
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jan 9;303(5655):232-5
references.pmid: 14716015
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):640-8
references.pmid: 16351371
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;18(6):279-92
references.pmid: 24747000
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):539-49
references.pmid: 20584747
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 21;32(47):16785-94
references.pmid: 23175832
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Oct 18;76(2):450-60
references.pmid: 23083745
references.citation: Z Psychol. 2010;218(2):141-145
references.pmid: 22095462
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2010 Mar;64(1):41-6
references.pmid: 20384417
references.citation: Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):403-15
references.pmid: 15487537
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2002 Sep;40(9):995-1002
references.pmid: 12296496
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2839-2848
references.pmid: 22917568
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Mar 4;29(9):2742-7
references.pmid: 19261868
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2000 Apr;38(4):319-45
references.pmid: 10761279
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1310-9
references.pmid: 24639546
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 10;5(11):e13706
references.pmid: 21085661
references.citation: Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;30(3):349-62
references.pmid: 20116915
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):34-43
references.pmid: 19222312
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2012 Feb;62(2):686-94
references.pmid: 21349277
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):366-9
references.pmid: 11268212
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):375-93
references.pmid: 22686849
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2009 Sep;47(9):761-73
references.pmid: 19559401