title: Functional analysis of normalized difference vegetation index curves reveals overwinter mule deer survival is driven by both spring and autumn phenology.
abstract: Large herbivore populations respond strongly to remotely sensed measures of primary productivity. Whereas most studies in seasonal environments have focused on the effects of spring plant phenology on juvenile survival, recent studies demonstrated that autumn nutrition also plays a crucial role. We tested for both direct and indirect (through body mass) effects of spring and autumn phenology on winter survival of 2315 mule deer fawns across a wide range of environmental conditions in Idaho, USA. We first performed a functional analysis that identified spring and autumn as the key periods for structuring the among-population and among-year variation of primary production (approximated from 1 km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)) along the growing season. A path analysis showed that early winter precipitation and direct and indirect effects of spring and autumn NDVI functional components accounted for 45% of observed variation in overwinter survival. The effect size of autumn phenology on body mass was about twice that of spring phenology, while direct effects of phenology on survival were similar between spring and autumn. We demonstrate that the effects of plant phenology vary across ecosystems, and that in semi-arid systems, autumn may be more important than spring for overwinter survival.
authors.affiliation: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, , Salmon, ID, USA.
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Hurley
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hebblewhite
authors.forename: Jean-Michel
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Gaillard
authors.forename: Stéphane
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dray
authors.forename: Kyle A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: W K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Pete
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Zager
authors.forename: Christophe
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bonenfant
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003670:Deer / Q000254:growth & development*; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D007061:Idaho; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D063245:Plant Development; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D012621:Seasons; D013686:Telemetry / Q000662:veterinary
keywords: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; demography; phenology curve; population dynamics; ungulate; winter severity
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10
references.pmid: 21560670
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Sep;75(5):1110-8
references.pmid: 16922846
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):503-10
references.pmid: 16701427
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2013 Mar;82(2):377-88
references.pmid: 23379674
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Mar;143(1):85-93
references.pmid: 15586292
references.citation: Oecologia. 2012 Jan;168(1):97-108
references.pmid: 21786022
references.citation: J Parasitol. 2003 Jun;89(3):445-51
references.pmid: 12880240
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Mar;151(2):232-9
references.pmid: 17102995
references.citation: Glob Chang Biol. 2012 Oct;18(10):3050-3062
references.pmid: 28741831
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Feb;90(2):363-8
references.pmid: 19323220
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2013 Nov;82(6):1326-39
references.pmid: 23855883
references.citation: Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1528-31
references.pmid: 11375487
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jul 12;363(1501):2359-68
references.pmid: 18006411
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2014 May;83(3):712-9
references.pmid: 24164593
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56450
references.pmid: 23451049
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):381-90
references.pmid: 17479756
references.citation: Stat Med. 2000 Jul 15;19(13):1771-81
references.pmid: 10861777
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jan;78(1):143-51
references.pmid: 18700872
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Sep;80(5):1078-87
references.pmid: 21545586
references.citation: Ecology. 2011 Sep;92(9):1789-98
references.pmid: 21939075
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Nov 22;272(1579):2357-64
references.pmid: 16243701
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Apr;25(4):207-14
references.pmid: 19897275
references.citation: Mov Ecol. 2013 Jul 03;1(1):3
references.pmid: 25709817
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Jun 18;8(6):e65582
references.pmid: 23824519
references.citation: Demography. 1979 Aug;16(3):439-54
references.pmid: 510638
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2011 Oct;25(5):1002-9
references.pmid: 21790785
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Sep 22;264(1386):1317-24
references.pmid: 9332016
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):681-6
references.pmid: 15209100