title: Understanding factors associated with the translation of cardiovascular research: a multinational case study approach.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Funders of health research increasingly seek to understand how best to allocate resources in order to achieve maximum value from their funding. We built an international consortium and developed a multinational case study approach to assess benefits arising from health research. We used that to facilitate analysis of factors in the production of research that might be associated with translating research findings into wider impacts, and the complexities involved.
  
  
  METHODS
  We built on the Payback Framework and expanded its application through conducting co-ordinated case studies on the payback from cardiovascular and stroke research in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom. We selected a stratified random sample of projects from leading medical research funders. We devised a series of innovative steps to: minimize the effect of researcher bias; rate the level of impacts identified in the case studies; and interrogate case study narratives to identify factors that correlated with achieving high or low levels of impact.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-nine detailed case studies produced many and diverse impacts. Over the 15 to 20 years examined, basic biomedical research has a greater impact than clinical research in terms of academic impacts such as knowledge production and research capacity building. Clinical research has greater levels of wider impact on health policies, practice, and generating health gains. There was no correlation between knowledge production and wider impacts. We identified various factors associated with high impact. Interaction between researchers and practitioners and the public is associated with achieving high academic impact and translation into wider impacts, as is basic research conducted with a clinical focus. Strategic thinking by clinical researchers, in terms of thinking through pathways by which research could potentially be translated into practice, is associated with high wider impact. Finally, we identified the complexity of factors behind research translation that can arise in a single case.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We can systematically assess research impacts and use the findings to promote translation. Research funders can justify funding research of diverse types, but they should not assume academic impacts are proxies for wider impacts. They should encourage researchers to consider pathways towards impact and engage potential research users in research processes.
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wooding
authors.affiliation: Health Economics Research Group (HERG), Brunel University, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. stephen.hanney@brunel.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Stephen R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Hanney
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pollitt
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Grant
authors.forename: Martin J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Buxton
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical; D006113:United Kingdom
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2007 Dec;11(53):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-180
references.pmid: 18031652
references.citation: Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):16
references.pmid: 28083172
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Sep;44(9):1145-56
references.pmid: 16049052
references.citation: Resuscitation. 2008 Aug;78(2):127-34
references.pmid: 18486301
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50
references.pmid: 22651257
references.citation: Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 May 07;9(1):17
references.pmid: 23651523
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Summer;24(3):259-69
references.pmid: 18601793
references.citation: Science. 1976 Apr 9;192(4235):105-11
references.pmid: 769161
references.citation: J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;18(1):46-50
references.pmid: 19270848
references.citation: Science. 2005 May 20;308(5725):1087
references.pmid: 15905367
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 05;6:1
references.pmid: 21208425
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 03;14:2
references.pmid: 24383766
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2008 Mar;86(1):125-55
references.pmid: 18307479
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 May 10;11:15
references.pmid: 23663364
references.citation: Diabet Med. 2006 Feb;23(2):176-84
references.pmid: 16433716
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):236-40
references.pmid: 10812803
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):239-44
references.pmid: 12425783
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2003 Jan 13;1(1):2
references.pmid: 12646071
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Jan;1(1):35-43
references.pmid: 10180843
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
references.pmid: 24289295
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 22;5:91
references.pmid: 21092164
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2001 Sep;53(6):745-57
references.pmid: 11511050
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jul;14(3):156-64
references.pmid: 19541874
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12 Suppl 1:S1-23-31
references.pmid: 17411504
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):517-25
references.pmid: 10499952
references.citation: Rand Health Q. 2012 Dec 1;1(4):14
references.pmid: 28083221
references.citation: Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 24;9:26
references.pmid: 21702930
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8 Suppl 2:1-6
references.pmid: 14596741
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125-54
references.pmid: 11933791
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 07;4:18
references.pmid: 19351400