title: Visuospatial selective attention in chickens.
abstract: Voluntary control of attention promotes intelligent, adaptive behaviors by enabling the selective processing of information that is most relevant for making decisions. Despite extensive research on attention in primates, the capacity for selective attention in nonprimate species has never been quantified. Here we demonstrate selective attention in chickens by applying protocols that have been used to characterize visual spatial attention in primates. Chickens were trained to localize and report the vertical position of a target in the presence of task-relevant distracters. A spatial cue, the location of which varied across individual trials, indicated the horizontal, but not vertical, position of the upcoming target. Spatial cueing improved localization performance: accuracy (d') increased and reaction times decreased in a space-specific manner. Distracters severely impaired perceptual performance, and this impairment was greatly reduced by spatial cueing. Signal detection analysis with an "indecision" model demonstrated that spatial cueing significantly increased choice certainty in localizing targets. By contrast, error-aversion certainty (certainty of not making an error) remained essentially constant across cueing protocols, target contrasts, and individuals. The results show that chickens shift spatial attention rapidly and dynamically, following principles of stimulus selection that closely parallel those documented in primates. The findings suggest that the mechanisms that control attention have been conserved through evolution, and establish chickens--a highly visual species that is easily trained and amenable to cutting-edge experimental technologies--as an attractive model for linking behavior to neural mechanisms of selective attention.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 dsridhar@stanford.edu.
authors.forename: Devarajan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sridharan
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
authors.forename: Deepa L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Ramamurthy
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
authors.forename: Jason S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Schwarz
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
authors.forename: Eric I
authors.initials: EI
authors.lastname: Knudsen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D002645:Chickens / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D011323:Primates; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: avian vision; competitive selection; executive functions; top-down control; voluntary attention
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Nov 26;60(4):528-30
references.pmid: 19038210
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64136
references.pmid: 23734188
references.citation: Neuron. 2011 Dec 8;72(5):832-46
references.pmid: 22153378
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):553-8
references.pmid: 21646014
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1297-320
references.pmid: 15066392
references.citation: Biomed Opt Express. 2011 Jun 1;2(6):1637-48
references.pmid: 21698025
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(2):319-37
references.pmid: 22950887
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):382-90
references.pmid: 16843702
references.citation: Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):75-97
references.pmid: 8997171
references.citation: Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):65-9
references.pmid: 23708965
references.citation: Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Nov 19;7:91
references.pmid: 24312023
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525
references.pmid: 21549742
references.citation: Vision Res. 1990;30(11):1897-911
references.pmid: 2288097
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:203-8
references.pmid: 13741095
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 Apr;45(9):1129-37
references.pmid: 15707921
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(10-12):1269-92
references.pmid: 10788639
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41136
references.pmid: 22815942
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1965 Aug;64:124-50
references.pmid: 14320077
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Dec;13(12):1554-9
references.pmid: 21057509
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):759-64
references.pmid: 19423820
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):434-7
references.pmid: 22972195
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993 Jan;19(1):26-37
references.pmid: 8418214
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1981 Feb 1;195(4):643-57
references.pmid: 7462446
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):207-12
references.pmid: 16811942
references.citation: Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1045-64
references.pmid: 18405935
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 May;38(9):1183-98
references.pmid: 9666987
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 May 19;8(5):7.1-10
references.pmid: 18842078
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:57-78
references.pmid: 17417935
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1297-309
references.pmid: 22492748
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 May 19;367(1594):1322-37
references.pmid: 22492750
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):31-45
references.pmid: 14979750
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):771-80
references.pmid: 21551339