title: Concepts of mental capacity for patients requesting assisted suicide: a qualitative analysis of expert evidence presented to the Commission on Assisted Dying.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In May 2013 a new Assisted Dying Bill was tabled in the House of Lords and is currently scheduled for a second reading in May 2014. The Bill was informed by the report of the Commission on Assisted Dying which itself was informed by evidence presented by invited experts.This study aims to explore how the experts presenting evidence to the Commission on Assisted Dying conceptualised mental capacity for patients requesting assisted suicide and examine these concepts particularly in relation to the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study was a secondary qualitative analysis of 36 transcripts of oral evidence and 12 pieces of written evidence submitted by invited experts to the Commission on Assisted Dying using a framework approach.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was agreement on the importance of mental capacity as a central safeguard in proposed assisted dying legislation. Concepts of mental capacity, however, were inconsistent. There was a tendency towards a conceptual and clinical shift toward a presumption of incapacity. This appeared to be based on the belief that assisted suicide should only be open to those with a high degree of mental capacity to make the decision.The 'boundaries' around the definition of mental capacity appeared to be on a continuum between a circumscribed legal 'cognitive' definition of capacity (in which most applicants would be found to have capacity unless significantly cognitively impaired) and a more inclusive definition which would take into account wider concepts such as autonomy, rationality, voluntariness and decision specific factors such as motivation for decision making.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ideas presented to the Commission on Assisted Dying about mental capacity as it relates to assisted suicide were inconsistent and in a number of cases at variance with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Further work needs to be done to establish a consensus as to what constitutes capacity for this decision and whether current legal frameworks are able to support clinicians in determining capacity for this group.
authors.affiliation: Clinical Research Worker in Palliative Care Psychiatry, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, 10 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK. Annabel.Price@kcl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Annabel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: Ruaidhri
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: McCormack
authors.forename: Theresa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wiseman
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hotopf
mesh_terms: D026683:Advisory Committees; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D005260:Female; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008297:Male; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000145:classification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D010166:Palliative Care; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D019452:Terminally Ill / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Oct;18(5):1038-44
references.pmid: 22995005
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):119
references.pmid: 16410598
references.citation: Issues Law Med. 2001 Spring;16(3):235-58
references.pmid: 11285862
references.citation: Palliat Med. 2011 Jan;25(1):36-51
references.pmid: 20935027
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;198(2):83-4
references.pmid: 21282775
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
references.pmid: 10625273
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Dec 13;284(22):2907-11
references.pmid: 11147988
references.citation: BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Sep;1(2):140-8
references.pmid: 24653226
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Oct 07;337:a1682
references.pmid: 18842645
references.citation: Psychosomatics. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):319-26
references.pmid: 22748750
references.citation: Palliat Med. 2011 Apr;25(3):229-41
references.pmid: 21228092
references.citation: All Engl Law Rep. 1992 Jul 30;[1992]4:649-70
references.pmid: 11648226
references.citation: Psychol Med. 1999 Mar;29(2):437-46
references.pmid: 10218935
references.citation: Int Psychogeriatr. 2004 Dec;16(4):397-419
references.pmid: 15715357
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 2004 Sep;97(9):415-20
references.pmid: 15340019
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;157(4):595-600
references.pmid: 10739419
references.citation: Psychopathology. 2005 Jul-Aug;38(4):171-6
references.pmid: 16145268
references.citation: Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Nov-Dec;5(6):580-4
references.pmid: 16411355
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1035
references.pmid: 18687726
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Nov;48(11):1415-9
references.pmid: 9355168
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Sep 07;341:c4489
references.pmid: 20823014