title: Use of silicate minerals for pH control during reductive dechlorination of chloroethenes in batch cultures of different microbial consortia.
abstract: In chloroethene-contaminated sites undergoing in situ bioremediation, groundwater acidification is a frequent problem in the source zone, and buffering strategies have to be implemented to maintain the pH in the neutral range. An alternative to conventional soluble buffers is silicate mineral particles as a long-term source of alkalinity. In previous studies, the buffering potentials of these minerals have been evaluated based on abiotic dissolution tests and geochemical modeling. In the present study, the buffering potentials of four silicate minerals (andradite, diopside, fayalite, and forsterite) were tested in batch cultures amended with tetrachloroethene (PCE) and inoculated with different organohalide-respiring consortia. Another objective of this study was to determine the influence of pH on the different steps of PCE dechlorination. The consortia showed significant differences in sensitivities toward acidic pH for the different dechlorination steps. Molecular analysis indicated that Dehalococcoides spp. that were present in all consortia were the most pH-sensitive organohalide-respiring guild members compared to Sulfurospirillum spp. and Dehalobacter spp. In batch cultures with silicate mineral particles as pH-buffering agents, all four minerals tested were able to maintain the pH in the appropriate range for reductive dechlorination of chloroethenes. However, complete dechlorination to ethene was observed only with forsterite, diopside, and fayalite. Dissolution of andradite increased the redox potential and did not allow dechlorination. With forsterite, diopside, and fayalite, dechlorination to ethene was observed but at much lower rates for the last two dechlorination steps than with the positive control. This indicated an inhibition effect of silicate minerals and/or their dissolution products on reductive dechlorination of cis-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride. Hence, despite the proven pH-buffering potential of silicate minerals, compatibility with the bacterial community involved in in situ bioremediation has to be carefully evaluated prior to their use for pH control at a specific site.
authors.affiliation: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecological Engineering Laboratory, Lausanne, Switzerland Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Enginerring (ENAC), Laboratory for Environmental Biotechnology, Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Elsa
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lacroix
authors.affiliation: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecological Engineering Laboratory, Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Brovelli
authors.affiliation: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Ecological Engineering Laboratory, Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: D A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Barry
authors.affiliation: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Enginerring (ENAC), Laboratory for Environmental Biotechnology, Lausanne, Switzerland christof.holliger@epfl.ch.
authors.forename: Christof
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Holliger
mesh_terms: D061249:Batch Cell Culture Techniques; D001711:Biotransformation; D002021:Buffers; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D059013:Microbial Consortia; D017640:Silicates / Q000737:chemistry*; D013750:Tetrachloroethylene / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D002021:Buffers; D017640:Silicates; D013750:Tetrachloroethylene
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1996 Feb;165(2):132-40
references.pmid: 8593100
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 2009 Jan;157(1):186-93
references.pmid: 18774208
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2261-9
references.pmid: 17438773
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Aug 1;407(16):4560-73
references.pmid: 19464727
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013 Feb;63(Pt 2):625-635
references.pmid: 22544797
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2002 Dec 1;36(23):5106-16
references.pmid: 12523427
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1998 Apr;169(4):313-21
references.pmid: 9531632
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1994;162(4):295-301
references.pmid: 7802545
references.citation: J Contam Hydrol. 2002 Jan;54(1-2):81-98
references.pmid: 11858196
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Nov;75(22):7268-70
references.pmid: 19749066
references.citation: J Contam Hydrol. 2014 May;160:21-9
references.pmid: 24589423
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Sep;36(9):1189-97
references.pmid: 19521729
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994 Oct;44(4):612-9
references.pmid: 7981092
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 May;69(5):2964-74
references.pmid: 12732573
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998 Dec;50(6):633-57
references.pmid: 9891928
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:423-52
references.pmid: 9891804
references.citation: Biodegradation. 2011 Sep;22(5):949-60
references.pmid: 21243405
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2318-23
references.pmid: 17438781
references.citation: Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2001 Jul;65(7):1474-81
references.pmid: 11515528
references.citation: Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000 Dec;27(10):812-820
references.pmid: 11118591
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Jun;57(3):369-78
references.pmid: 15134884
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Apr 1;38(7):2021-8
references.pmid: 15112802
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(8):1093-101
references.pmid: 12826480
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2012 Sep 13;11:128
references.pmid: 22974059
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Mar;79(3):728-40
references.pmid: 22098093
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jul;36(2-3):185-191
references.pmid: 11451523
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):2991-7
references.pmid: 8215370
references.citation: J Contam Hydrol. 2013 Apr;147:25-33
references.pmid: 23500838
references.citation: Water Res. 2008 Jun;42(12):2963-74
references.pmid: 18462771