title: The process of developing and implementing a telephone-based peer support program for postpartum depression: evidence from two randomized controlled trials.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of telephone-based peer support on preventing postpartum depression (PPD) among high-risk mothers. The results indicated that support provided by peer volunteers may be an effective preventative strategy. The purpose of this paper is to outline the process of developing, implementing, maintaining, and evaluating the peer support program that we used in this PPD prevention trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  The peer support program had been used successfully in a pilot trial and a previous breastfeeding peer support trial. Based on our experience and lessons learned, we developed a 4-phase, 12-step approach so that the peer support model could be copied and used by different health providers in various settings. We will use the PPD prevention trial to demonstrate the suggested steps.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The trial aim to prevent the onset of PPD was established. Peer volunteers who previously experienced and recovered from self-reported PPD were recruited and attended a four-hour training session. Volunteers were screened and those identified as appropriate to provide support to postpartum mothers were selected. Women who scored more than 9 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale within the first two weeks after childbirth were recruited to participate in the trial and proactive, individualized, telephone-based peer support (mother-to-mother) was provided to those randomized to the intervention group. Peer volunteers maintained the intervention, supported other volunteers, and evaluated the telephone-based support program. Possible negative effects of the intervention were assessed. An in-depth assessment of maternal perspectives of the program at 12 weeks postpartum was performed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The 4-phase, 12-step approach delineated in this paper provides clear and concise guidelines for health professionals to follow in creating and implementing community-based, peer-support interventions with the potential to prevent PPD.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68337727.
authors.affiliation: Lawrence S, Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada. cindylee.dennis@utoronto.ca.
authors.forename: Cindy-Lee
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Dennis
mesh_terms: D019052:Depression, Postpartum / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology*; D010379:Peer Group; D011247:Pregnancy; D016730:Program Development; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012944:Social Support; D013689:Telephone; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014838:Volunteers / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;41(6):737-46
references.pmid: 11039686
references.citation: Health Promot Int. 2013 Jun;28(2):187-96
references.pmid: 22388589
references.citation: Acta Paediatr. 2007 Apr;96(4):590-4
references.pmid: 17391475
references.citation: Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2006 Mar;9(1):65-83
references.pmid: 16817009
references.citation: J Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;65(12):1258-69
references.pmid: 19827112
references.citation: BMJ. 2009 Jan 15;338:a3064
references.pmid: 19147637
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;163(6):1026-32
references.pmid: 16741203
references.citation: Birth. 1997 Jun;24(2):109-15
references.pmid: 9271977
references.citation: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):289-95
references.pmid: 15234824
references.citation: Nurs Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;50(5):275-85
references.pmid: 11570712
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2009 Apr;123(4):e736-51
references.pmid: 19336362
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):321-32
references.pmid: 12605954
references.citation: CMAJ. 2002 Jan 8;166(1):21-8
references.pmid: 11800243
references.citation: Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003 Nov;6(4):263-74
references.pmid: 14628179
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 May;42(5):389-95
references.pmid: 17396205
references.citation: Clin Psychol Rev. 2000 Aug;20(5):561-92
references.pmid: 10860167
references.citation: Can J Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;48(2):115-24
references.pmid: 12655910
references.citation: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;40(1):18-26
references.pmid: 11195555
references.citation: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Apr;(153):1-186
references.pmid: 17764214
references.citation: Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):253-60
references.pmid: 9089818
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 May;47(5):560-8
references.pmid: 19962699
references.citation: Birth. 2006 Dec;33(4):323-31
references.pmid: 17150072
references.citation: Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):187-93
references.pmid: 16128972
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
references.pmid: 3651732
references.citation: Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2005 Feb;(119):1-8
references.pmid: 15760246
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;166(2):191-5
references.pmid: 7728362
references.citation: Am J Perinatol. 2013 Sep;30(8):631-42
references.pmid: 23283805
references.citation: Acta Paediatr. 2007 Dec;96(12):1777-83
references.pmid: 18001335