title: The Walking Egg Project: Universal access to infertility care - from dream to reality.
abstract: Childlessness and infertility care are neglected aspects of family planning in resource-poor countries, although the consequences of involuntary childlessness are much more dramatic and can create more wide ranging societal problems compared to Western societies, particularly for women. Because many families in developing countries completely depend on children for economic survival, childlessness has to be regarded as a social and public health issue and not only as an individual medical problem. In the Walking Egg Project we strive to raise awareness surrounding childlessness in resource-poor countries and to make infertility care in all its aspects, including assisted reproductive technologies, available and accessible for a much larger part of the world population. We hope to achieve this goal through innovation and research, advocacy and networking, training and capacity building and service delivery. The Walking Egg non-profit organization has chosen a holistic approach of reproductive health and therefore strengthening infertility care should go together with strengthening other aspects of family planning and mother care. Right from the start The Walking Project has approached the problem of infertility in a multidisciplinary and global manner. It gathers medical, social, ethical, epidemiological, juridical and economical scientists and experts along with artists and philosophers to discuss and work together towards its goal. We recently developed a simplified tWE lab IVF culture system with excellent results. According to our first cost calculation, the price of a single IVF cycle using the methodologies and protocols we described, seems to be less than 200 Euros. We realize that universal access to infertility care can only be achieved when good quality but affordable infertility care is linked to effective family planning and safe motherhood programmes. Only a global project with respect to sociocultural, ethical, economical and political differences can be successful.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuizen Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos, 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium ; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium ; President of "The Walking Egg non-profit organization.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Ombelet
keywords: Assisted reproduction; IVF; developing countries; infertility care; intrauterine insemination; medical education; one-step diagnostic phase; resource-poor countries; simplified IVF; sociocultural factors
references.citation: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000 Dec 1;25(4):345-52
references.pmid: 11114835
references.citation: Dev Biol. 1974 Sep;40(1):40-51
references.pmid: 4472058
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD001838
references.pmid: 17054143
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2009 May;24(5):1008-11
references.pmid: 19189993
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Aug;105(8):836-48
references.pmid: 9746375
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Sep;15(3):257-65
references.pmid: 17854519
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2010;2(3):194-207
references.pmid: 25013712
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1938-43
references.pmid: 15774542
references.citation: Africa (Lond). 1994;64(2):243-51
references.pmid: 12320088
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(2):77-88
references.pmid: 24753853
references.citation: Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Nov-Dec;14(6):605-21
references.pmid: 18820005
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Jun;22(6):1506-12
references.pmid: 17376819
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2000 May;8(15):33-44
references.pmid: 11424266
references.citation: J Med Assoc Thai. 1994 Jan;77(1):12-8
references.pmid: 7798825
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):258-63
references.pmid: 15550496
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2009;1(2):106-21
references.pmid: 25478076
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(11):1679-704
references.pmid: 9428088
references.citation: J Reprod Dev. 2011 Sep;57(4):551-5
references.pmid: 21532256
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(4):257-66
references.pmid: 24753875
references.citation: Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011;3(4):253-5
references.pmid: 24753874
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 1997 Jul;12(7):1458-63
references.pmid: 9262278
references.citation: Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-29
references.pmid: 19091755
references.citation: Sex Transm Infect. 2011 Feb;87(1):28-34
references.pmid: 20852311
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1959-66
references.pmid: 12923157
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Nov;22(11):2801-4
references.pmid: 17855409
references.citation: Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012 Apr 27;10:35
references.pmid: 22541043
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2001 Apr;16(4):696-702
references.pmid: 11278221
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2001 Feb;16(2):215-9
references.pmid: 11157809
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2002 Jun;17(6):1657-62
references.pmid: 12042294
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):960-7
references.pmid: 15016772
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Oct-Nov;7(4):485-92
references.pmid: 14656412
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 May;56(9):1837-51
references.pmid: 12650724
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 6;343(1):2-7
references.pmid: 10882762
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2002 Jun;17(6):1663-8
references.pmid: 12042295
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2001 Feb;16(2):259-62
references.pmid: 11157816
references.citation: Bioethics. 2001 Jun;15(3):218-30
references.pmid: 11700676
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Dec 9;368(9552):2095-100
references.pmid: 17161731
references.citation: Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002 Dec;267(2):67-71
references.pmid: 12439549