title: Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services.
abstract: Within-city green infrastructure can offer opportunities and new contexts for people to become stewards of ecosystem services. We analyze cities as social-ecological systems, synthesize the literature, and provide examples from more than 15 years of research in the Stockholm urban region, Sweden. The social-ecological approach spans from investigating ecosystem properties to the social frameworks and personal values that drive and shape human interactions with nature. Key findings demonstrate that urban ecosystem services are generated by social-ecological systems and that local stewards are critically important. However, land-use planning and management seldom account for their role in the generation of urban ecosystem services. While the small scale patchwork of land uses in cities stimulates intense interactions across borders much focus is still on individual patches. The results highlight the importance and complexity of stewardship of urban biodiversity and ecosystem services and of the planning and governance of urban green infrastructure.
authors.affiliation: Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden, erik.andersson@su.se.
authors.forename: Erik
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Andersson
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Barthel
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Borgström
authors.forename: Johan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Colding
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Elmqvist
authors.forename: Carl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Folke
authors.forename: Åsa
authors.initials: Å
authors.lastname: Gren
mesh_terms: D002947:Cities; D055669:Ecological and Environmental Phenomena; D017753:Ecosystem
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Apr;25(4):241-9
references.pmid: 19923035
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23777
references.pmid: 21876770
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):468-79
references.pmid: 21352450
references.citation: Ambio. 2011 Nov;40(7):719-38
references.pmid: 22338712
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22;100(15):8788-92
references.pmid: 12847293
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Feb;14(2):101-12
references.pmid: 21087380
references.citation: Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4
references.pmid: 16040698
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jul 4;321(5885):123-6
references.pmid: 18599788
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Sep 24;461(7263):472-5
references.pmid: 19779433
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Aug;20(8):430-4
references.pmid: 16701413
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Jul;17(5):1267-78
references.pmid: 17708207
references.citation: Science. 2008 Feb 8;319(5864):756-60
references.pmid: 18258902
references.citation: Ambio. 2006 Aug;35(5):237-44
references.pmid: 16989508
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Feb;25(2):90-8
references.pmid: 19758724