title: Use of 3 tools to assess nutrition risk in the intensive care unit.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Identifying patients at nutrition risk proves difficult in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to the nature of critical illness. No consensus exists on the most appropriate method to identify these patients. Traditional screens and assessments are often limited due to their subjective nature. The purpose of the quality improvement project was to compare proportions of ICU patients deemed at nutrition risk using 3 different tools.
  
  
  METHODS
  A convenience sample of 294 patients admitted to the ICU was used. Patients were assessed using the institution's routine nutrition screening method, the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and the NUTrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) score. Information was collected on demographics, severity of illness, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), and disposition. Descriptive statistics were used to examine counts/proportions of risk categories; means ± SD were used to summarize demographic and clinical variables.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 139 patients (47%) were deemed at nutrition risk or malnourished by at least 1 tool. Patients identified were older and had a lower body mass index, more weight loss, more fat and muscle wasting, more fluid accumulation, and lower average handgrips than those not at nutrition risk; they also had longer hospital and ICU LOS, higher rates of requiring further rehabilitation upon discharge, and higher mortality during hospitalization.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Traditional screening and assessment tools did not uniformly identify patients as malnourished or at nutrition risk in the ICU and therefore may be inappropriate for use in this population. Inclusion of physical assessment, functional status, and severity of illness may be useful in predicting nutrition risk in the ICU.
authors.affiliation: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois anne.e.coltman@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Coltman
authors.affiliation: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Peterson
authors.affiliation: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: Kelly
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Roehl
authors.affiliation: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: Hannah
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Roosevelt
authors.affiliation: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: Diane
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sowa
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015992:Body Mass Index; D016638:Critical Illness / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D044342:Malnutrition / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000517:prevention & control; D008875:Middle Aged; D015596:Nutrition Assessment; D009752:Nutritional Status; D012307:Risk Factors
keywords: adult; life cycle; nutrition; nutrition assessment; nutrition support practice; outcomes research/quality