title: Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness.
abstract: This study examined metalinguistic awareness in children who were becoming bilingual in an immersion education program. The purpose was to determine at what point in emerging bilingualism the previously reported metalinguistic advantages appear and what types of metalinguistic tasks reveal these developmental differences. Participants were 124 children in second and fifth grades who were enrolled in either a French immersion or a regular English program. All children were from monolingual English-speaking homes and attended local public schools in middle socioeconomic neighborhoods. Measures included morphological awareness, syntactic awareness, and verbal fluency, with all testing in English. These tasks differed in their need for executive control, a cognitive ability that is enhanced in bilingual children. Overall, the metalinguistic advantages reported in earlier research emerged gradually, with advantages for tasks requiring more executive control (grammaticality judgment) appearing later and some tasks improving but not exceeding performance of monolinguals (verbal fluency) even by fifth grade. These findings demonstrate the gradual emergence of changes in metalinguistic concepts associated with bilingualism over a period of about 5 years. Performance on English-language proficiency tasks was maintained by French immersion children throughout in spite of schooling being conducted in French.
authors.affiliation: York University.
authors.forename: Ellen
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bialystok
authors.affiliation: Ryerson University.
authors.forename: Kathleen F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Peets
authors.affiliation: Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest.
authors.forename: Sylvain
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Moreno
references.citation: Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1356-66
references.pmid: 20840226
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2006 Dec;99(3):236-46
references.pmid: 16226804
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1972 Dec;1(4):299-310
references.pmid: 24197740
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):325-39
references.pmid: 15595373
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
references.pmid: 10945922
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 1992 Jul;21(4):301-16
references.pmid: 1403995
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2002 Oct;16(4):562-76
references.pmid: 12382994
references.citation: Int J Neurosci. 2002 Jun;112(6):759-76
references.pmid: 12325314
references.citation: Biling (Camb Engl). 2010 Oct;13(4):525-531
references.pmid: 25750580
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2008 Mar;11(2):282-98
references.pmid: 18333982
references.citation: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Mar;22(3):415-22
references.pmid: 17336036
references.citation: J Neurolinguistics. 2010 Nov 1;23(6):564-579
references.pmid: 21057658
references.citation: Cognition. 1990 Jan;34(1):1-56
references.pmid: 2302940
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):29-41
references.pmid: 19793584
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):93-105
references.pmid: 20053009