title: Emergency department use: is frequent use associated with a lack of primary care provider?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine if having a primary care provider is an important factor in frequency of emergency department (ED) use.
  
  
  METHODS
  Analysis of a central computerized health network database.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three EDs in southern New Brunswick.
  
  
  METHODS
  All ED visits during 1 calendar year to an urban regional hospital (URH), an urban urgent care centre (UCC), and a rural community hospital (RCH) were captured.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with and without listed primary care providers were compared in terms of number of visits to the ED. A logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors predictive of frequent attendance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In total, 48 505, 41 004, and 27 900 visits were made to the URH, UCC, and RCH, respectively, in 2009. The proportion of patients with listed primary care providers was 36.6% for the URH, 37.1% for the UCC, and 89.4% for the RCH. Among ED patients at all sites, frequent attenders (4 or more visits to an ED in 1 year) were significantly more likely (59.6% vs 45.1%, P < .001) to have listed primary care providers. Other factors that predicted frequent use included attendance at a rural ED, female sex, and older age.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study characterizes attendance rates for 3 EDs in southern New Brunswick. Our findings highlight interesting differences between urban and rural ED populations, and suggest that frequent use of the ED might not be related to lack of a listed primary care provider.
authors.affiliation: Saint John Regional Hospital, Emergency Medicine, PO Box 2100, 400 University Ave, Saint John, NB E2L 4L2. paul.atkinson@dal.ca.
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Palmer
authors.forename: Denise
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Leblanc-Duchin
authors.forename: Joshua
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Murray
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Atkinson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D016208:Databases, Factual; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009509:New Brunswick / Q000453:epidemiology; D011320:Primary Health Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D019035:Rural Health Services; D012737:Sex Factors; D019037:Urban Health Services; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7
references.pmid: 15576522
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;32(5):563-8
references.pmid: 9795318
references.citation: J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):115-21
references.pmid: 18462906
references.citation: Can Fam Physician. 2012 Nov;58(11):e658-66
references.pmid: 23152473
references.citation: CMAJ. 2001 Oct 16;165(8):1049-50
references.pmid: 11699700
references.citation: Health Rep. 2004 Oct;16(1):35-9
references.pmid: 15581132
references.citation: J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Apr;31(2):139-44
references.pmid: 15834378
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-487-503
references.pmid: 15513956
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8
references.pmid: 20346540
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):320-8
references.pmid: 12670845
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):561-7
references.pmid: 11385324
references.citation: Med Care. 1998 Aug;36(8):1249-55
references.pmid: 9708596
references.citation: Emerg Med J. 2009 Apr;26(4):263-7
references.pmid: 19307386
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):1-8
references.pmid: 16781914