title: A survey of retirement intentions of Baby Boomers: an overview of health, social and economic determinants.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Governments have been implementing policies aimed at halting the trend towards early retirement for Baby Boomers. Public policies can have a strong effect on when a person retires and this analysis contributes to an improved understanding of retirement aspirations in regards to health, social, workplace and economic determinants.
  
  
  METHODS
  In October 2011 a telephone survey was undertaken with participants aged 50 to 65 years who were in paid employment and who had been in the workforce for the previous three years. Participants were obtained from two identical South Australian cohort studies - the North West Adelaide Health Study and the Florey Adelaide Male Ageing Study. The results of the telephone survey were linked to the original cohort data. Data were weighted by sex, age, postcode and probability of selection in the household. Work related questions included how much they thought about their retirement, current occupation, employment status, type of workplace and hours worked per week. Health related questions included current smoking status, physical activity, body mass index, self-reported health status and overall life satisfaction. Uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were undertaken to compare the different associations between people who were and were not intending to retire.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In total, 25.9% (n = 210) of people who were currently in paid employment indicated that they intend to retire completely from the workforce. The remainder indicated that they will continue to work (41.8% retire from full-time work but work part-time, 25.7% continue working part-time but reduce their current hours, and 6.7% never retire). The multi-variable results indicate that those with lower education, having a savings habit, and sales workers more likely to anticipate complete retirement. The self-employed, and those thinking only moderately about retirement, were more likely to extend their working life beyond age 65.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  An important finding of this study is the large number of Baby Boomers who indicated that they would be happy to work part-time or never retire. Policies and continued dialogue aimed at making the workplace a safe, flexible and welcoming environment to accommodate this wish, and to entice others to take up this option over complete withdrawal from the labour force, is required.
authors.affiliation: Population Research & Outcome Studies, Discipline of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Anne.taylor@adelaide.edu.au.
authors.forename: Anne W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Taylor
authors.forename: Rhiannon
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pilkington
authors.forename: Helen
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Feist
authors.forename: Eleonora
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Dal Grande
authors.forename: Graeme
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hugo
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001290:Attitude; D001315:Australia; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D004522:Educational Status; D004651:Employment; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009790:Occupations; D011158:Population Growth; D011640:Public Policy; D012179:Retirement / Q000191:economics; D017132:Workplace
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 30;8:261
references.pmid: 18664294
references.citation: Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2006 Apr 12;3:4
references.pmid: 16608529
references.citation: J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):95-100
references.pmid: 21491301
references.citation: Australas J Ageing. 2010 Jun;29(2):88-91
references.pmid: 20553540
references.citation: J Aging Soc Policy. 2011 Apr;23(2):101-18
references.pmid: 21491302
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2013 May 28;13:516
references.pmid: 23714371
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 May;64(3):369-77
references.pmid: 19299256
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Oct;1114:230-40
references.pmid: 17717089
references.citation: J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):230-46
references.pmid: 21463050
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;66(4):461-4
references.pmid: 23021859
references.citation: Australas J Ageing. 2010 Sep;29(3):130-3
references.pmid: 20815843
references.citation: Chronobiol Int. 2008 Apr;25(2):165-81
references.pmid: 18484359
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2011 Jan;30(1):77-86
references.pmid: 21183235
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(7):1105-12
references.pmid: 21831493
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Mar;66(2):249-59
references.pmid: 21310772
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Oct;1114:267-78
references.pmid: 17986587
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76
references.pmid: 12214795
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Sep;62(5):S286-94
references.pmid: 17906172
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;38(6):1479-86
references.pmid: 19074192
references.citation: Australas J Ageing. 2010 Sep;29(3):100-2
references.pmid: 20815837
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 15;166(4):439-46
references.pmid: 17556762
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 May-Jun;19(3):191-203
references.pmid: 10812799
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 03;13:292
references.pmid: 23551994