title: Electrophysiological evidence for failures of item individuation in crowded visual displays.
abstract: Visual perception is strongly impaired when peripheral targets are surrounded by nearby distractors, a phenomenon known as visual crowding. One common behavioral signature of visual crowding is an increased tendency for observers to mistakenly report the features of nearby distractors instead of the target item. Here, our goal was to distinguish between two possible explanations of such substitution errors. On the one hand, crowding may have its effects after the deployment of attention toward-and individuation of-targets and flankers, such that multiple individuated perceptual representations compete to guide the behavioral response. On the other hand, crowding may prevent the individuation of closely spaced stimuli, thereby reducing the number of apprehended items. We attempted to distinguish these alternatives using the N2pc, an ERP that has been shown to track the deployment of spatial attention and index the number of individuated items within a hemifield. N2pc amplitude increased monotonically with set size in uncrowded displays, but this set size effect was abolished in crowded visual displays. Moreover, these crowding-induced declines in N2pc amplitude predicted individual differences in the rate of substitution errors. Thus, crowding-induced confusions between targets and distractors may be a consequence of failures to individuate target and distractor stimuli during early stages of visual selection.
authors.affiliation: University of Oregon.
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: Edward F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Ester
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Klee
authors.forename: Edward K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Vogel
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Awh
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D007207:Individuation; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Jan 29;7(2):1.1-7
references.pmid: 18217816
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Jun;8(3):353-82
references.pmid: 6212628
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 Nov 18;11(13):18
references.pmid: 22101017
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 Sep;46(5):1080-9
references.pmid: 19497003
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 Dec 29;5(11):1024-37
references.pmid: 16441200
references.citation: Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57
references.pmid: 1455707
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(5):635-54
references.pmid: 18226828
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Mar 23;10(3):1.1-14
references.pmid: 20377278
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 16;5(9):
references.pmid: 20862327
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1994;8(2):255-79
references.pmid: 7993878
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Feb 07;7(2):5.1-26
references.pmid: 18217820
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):754-61
references.pmid: 22266261
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Sep 09;9(10):7.1-11
references.pmid: 19810788
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 Jul;46(4):771-5
references.pmid: 19490518
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1022-33
references.pmid: 24364703
references.citation: Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8
references.pmid: 5437004
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35
references.pmid: 18828191
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Jun 30;8(8):12.1-9
references.pmid: 18831635
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1981 Oct;30(4):330-40
references.pmid: 7322810
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1984 Sep;36(3):285-95
references.pmid: 6522221
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):546-60
references.pmid: 19883136
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 Sep;14(9):2057-68
references.pmid: 9291601
references.citation: Vision Res. 2005 May;45(11):1385-98
references.pmid: 15743609
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):641-4
references.pmid: 20483840
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):64-87
references.pmid: 9212722
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19;31(3):1128-38
references.pmid: 21248137
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7169-77
references.pmid: 22623661
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Jun;49(6):495-508
references.pmid: 1857623
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Nov 20;7(2):23.1-12
references.pmid: 18217838
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1975 May;82(3):184-99
references.pmid: 1153570
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):824-835
references.pmid: 23067117
references.citation: Vision Res. 2008 Oct;48(22):2352-8
references.pmid: 18723044
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):929-38
references.pmid: 23572280
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1983 Feb;33(2):129-38
references.pmid: 6844104
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1980 May;27(5):409-20
references.pmid: 7383829
references.citation: J Vis. 2009 Feb 06;9(2):5.1-11
references.pmid: 19271915
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Apr 16;28(16):4183-91
references.pmid: 18417697
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17453
references.pmid: 21387002
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Aug 18;10(10):17
references.pmid: 20884482
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44
references.pmid: 11426231
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
references.pmid: 7964526
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Jun;41(14):1833-50
references.pmid: 11369047
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):867-9
references.pmid: 10476964
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1982;44(1):51-65
references.pmid: 7111596
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Feb 14;7(2):7.1-23
references.pmid: 18217822
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1979 Jun;25(6):447-56
references.pmid: 492909
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1972 Apr;93(1):72-82
references.pmid: 5013342
references.citation: J Vis. 2007 Feb 05;7(2):4.1-12
references.pmid: 18217819
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000646
references.pmid: 20098499
references.citation: J Vis. 2011 Jan 05;11(1):6
references.pmid: 21209275
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Sep 26;12(10):13
references.pmid: 23019118