title: Comparison of calculation methods used for the determination of anthelmintic resistance in sheep in a temperate continental climate.
abstract: This study compared results obtained with five different fecal egg count reduction (FECR) calculation methods for defining resistance to ivermectin, fenbendazole, and levamisole in gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep in a temperate continental climate: FECR1 and FECR2 used pre- and posttreatment fecal egg count (FEC) means from both treated and control animals, but FECR1 used arithmetic means, whereas FECR2 used geometric means; FECR3 used arithmetic means for pre- and posttreatment FECs from treated animals only; FECR4 was calculated using only arithmetic means for posttreatment FECs from treated and control animals; and FECR5 was calculated using mean FEC estimates from a general linear mixed model. The classification of farm anthelmintic resistance (AR) status varied, depending on which FECR calculation method was used and whether a bias correction term (BCT, i.e., half the minimum detection limit) was added to the zeroes or not. Overall, agreement between all methods was higher when a BCT was used, particularly when levels of resistance were low. FECR4 showed the highest agreement with all the other FECR methods. We therefore recommend that small ruminant clinicians use the FECR4 formula with a BCT for AR determination, as this would reduce the cost of the FECRT, while still minimizing bias and allowing for comparisons between different farms. For researchers, we recommend the use of FECR1 or FECR2, as the inclusion of both pre- and posttreatment FECs and use of randomly allocated animals in treatment and control groups makes these methods mathematically more likely to estimate the true anthelmintic efficacy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2 W1, Canada, laura.falzon@vetsuisse.unibe.ch.
authors.forename: L C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Falzon
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: van Leeuwen
authors.forename: P I
authors.initials: PI
authors.lastname: Menzies
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jones-Bitton
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sears
authors.forename: J T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Jansen
authors.forename: A S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Peregrine
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000871:Anthelmintics / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002980:Climate; D004351:Drug Resistance; D005243:Feces / Q000469:parasitology; D008954:Models, Biological; D009348:Nematoda / Q000187:drug effects*; D009349:Nematode Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000469:parasitology / Q000662:veterinary*; D010270:Parasite Egg Count / Q000662:veterinary; D012756:Sheep; D012757:Sheep Diseases / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000469:parasitology*
chemical_list: D000871:Anthelmintics
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 4;186(1-2):79-92
references.pmid: 22154971
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 Aug 13;188(1-2):194-9
references.pmid: 22503038
references.citation: Vet Res. 2003 Jul-Aug;34(4):461-7
references.pmid: 12911862
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 23;196(3-4):433-7
references.pmid: 23601665
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2010 May 11;169(3-4):352-7
references.pmid: 20149547
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2004 May 7;121(1-2):105-13
references.pmid: 15110408
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2006 Mar 31;136(3-4):167-85
references.pmid: 16427201
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 1999 Mar 1;81(3):211-24
references.pmid: 10190865
references.citation: Aust Vet J. 1980 May;56(5):239-51
references.pmid: 7002142
references.citation: Parasitology. 2000;120 Suppl:S95-107
references.pmid: 10874713
references.citation: Aust Vet J. 1988 Feb;65(2):66-8
references.pmid: 3355458
references.citation: Parasitol Today. 1994 Nov;10(11):446-8
references.pmid: 15275533
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 4;186(1-2):143-9
references.pmid: 22154257
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2013 Mar 31;193(1-3):150-62
references.pmid: 23218224
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 Sep 30;189(1):89-96
references.pmid: 22520233
references.citation: Parasitol Res. 2011 Sep;109(3):953-7
references.pmid: 21472403
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 May 4;186(1-2):70-8
references.pmid: 22154968
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 1997 Jul 1;70(4):283-8
references.pmid: 9211654
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 Sep 30;189(1):85-8
references.pmid: 22503039
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 1995 Jun;58(3):181-213
references.pmid: 7571325
references.citation: N Z Vet J. 2006 Dec;54(6):323-8
references.pmid: 17151732
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2005 Mar 31;128(3-4):291-8
references.pmid: 15740866
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2012 Sep 10;188(3-4):391-6
references.pmid: 22521979
references.citation: N Z Vet J. 2006 Aug;54(4):202-3
references.pmid: 16915344
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 1992 Sep;44(1-2):35-44
references.pmid: 1441190
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):316-23
references.pmid: 19962203
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2009 Apr 6;161(1-2):162-7
references.pmid: 19135802
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1997 Nov 1;141(18):472-3
references.pmid: 9392066
references.citation: Trends Parasitol. 2004 Oct;20(10):477-81
references.pmid: 15363441