title: The influence of between-farm distance and farm size on the spread of classical swine fever during the 1997-1998 epidemic in The Netherlands.
abstract: As the size of livestock farms in The Netherlands is on the increase for economic reasons, an important question is how disease introduction risks and risks of onward transmission scale with farm size (i.e. with the number of animals on the farm). Here we use the epidemic data of the 1997-1998 epidemic of Classical Swine Fever (CSF) Virus in The Netherlands to address this question for CSF risks. This dataset is one of the most powerful ones statistically as in this epidemic a total of 428 pig farms where infected, with the majority of farm sizes ranging between 27 and 1750 pigs, including piglets. We have extended the earlier models for the transmission risk as a function of between-farm distance, by adding two factors. These factors describe the effect of farm size on the susceptibility of a 'receiving' farm and on the infectivity of a 'sending' farm (or 'source' farm), respectively. Using the best-fitting model, we show that the size of a farm has a significant influence on both farm-level susceptibility and infectivity for CSF. Although larger farms are both more susceptible to CSF and, when infected, more infectious to other farms than smaller farms, the increase is less than linear. The higher the farm size, the smaller the effect of increments of farm size on the susceptibility and infectivity of a farm. Because of changes in the Dutch pig farming characteristics, a straightforward extrapolation of the observed farm size dependencies from 1997/1998 to present times would not be justified. However, based on our results one may expect that also for the current pig farming characteristics in The Netherlands, farm susceptibility and infectivity depend non-linearly on farm size, with some saturation effect for relatively large farm sizes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Crisis organization and Diagnostics, Central Veterinary Institute (CVI) of Wageningen, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Gert Jan
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Boender
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Crisis organization and Diagnostics, Central Veterinary Institute (CVI) of Wageningen, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Rob
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: van den Hengel
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Crisis organization and Diagnostics, Central Veterinary Institute (CVI) of Wageningen, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Herman J W
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: van Roermund
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Crisis organization and Diagnostics, Central Veterinary Institute (CVI) of Wageningen, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Hagenaars
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D006691:Classical Swine Fever / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000635:transmission; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D013552:Swine
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21484-9
references.pmid: 20018697
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(10):e1002699
references.pmid: 23093917
references.citation: Vet Microbiol. 2000 Apr 13;73(2-3):183-96
references.pmid: 10785327
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2007 Nov 15;82(1-2):90-101
references.pmid: 17602765
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Apr 20;3(4):e71
references.pmid: 17447838
references.citation: Epidemiol Infect. 2002 Apr;128(2):285-91
references.pmid: 12002547
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):235-48
references.pmid: 10619158
references.citation: Math Biosci. 2003 Dec;186(2):145-73
references.pmid: 14583170
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2003 Jul 30;60(1):27-36
references.pmid: 12900147
references.citation: BMC Vet Res. 2008 Feb 25;4:9
references.pmid: 18298803
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Oct 6;6(39):849-61
references.pmid: 19054739
references.citation: Epidemics. 2009 Mar;1(1):21-34
references.pmid: 21352749
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):219-34
references.pmid: 10619157
references.citation: Vet Q. 2000 Oct;22(4):228-33
references.pmid: 11087136
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):271-95
references.pmid: 10619160
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):157-84
references.pmid: 10619154
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 1999 Dec 1;42(3-4):139-55
references.pmid: 10619153