title: Cancer conversations in context: naturalistic observation of couples coping with breast cancer.
abstract: This study explored the feasibility and potentials of a naturalistic observation approach to studying dyadic coping in everyday life. Specifically, it examined the natural context and content of the spontaneous cancer conversations of couples coping with cancer, and how they relate to patients' and spouses' psychological adjustment. Women with breast cancer (N = 56) and their spouses wore the electronically activated recorder (EAR), an unobtrusive observation method that periodically records snippets of ambient sounds, over one weekend to observe the couples' cancer conversations in their natural context. Both patients and spouses completed self-reported measures of psychological adjustment at baseline and at a 2-month follow-up. Cancer was a topic of approximately 5% of couples' conversations. Cancer conversations occurred more often within the couple than with friends and family, and they were more often informational than emotional or supportive. Consistent with research on the social cognitive processing model (Lepore & Revenson, 2007), spouses' engagement in emotional disclosure and informational conversation with patients predicted better patient adjustment. This first naturalistic observation study of dyadic coping revealed that the EAR method can be implemented with high compliance and relatively low obtrusiveness within the sensitive context of couples coping with cancer, and having a spouse who discussed cancer in an emotional or informational way predicted better patient adjustment. As a complement to in-lab and other momentary assessment methods, a naturalistic observation approach with a method such as the EAR can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the role that communication processes play in coping with cancer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California.
authors.forename: Megan L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Robbins
authors.affiliation: University of Arizona Cancer Center.
authors.forename: Ana María
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: López
authors.affiliation: University of Arizona Cancer Center.
authors.forename: Karen L
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Weihs
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Arizona.
authors.forename: Matthias R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Mehl
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D001294:Attitude to Health; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology*; D003142:Communication; D004644:Emotions; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018454:Spouses / Q000523:psychology*; D013637:Tape Recording
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;118(3):482-95
references.pmid: 21534704
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2007 Mar;19(1):25-43
references.pmid: 17371121
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2008 Jan;70(1):117-24
references.pmid: 18158376
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):359-66
references.pmid: 20545409
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Oct;68(5):875-82
references.pmid: 11068973
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):20-30
references.pmid: 21299291
references.citation: J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(4):543-52
references.pmid: 20460411
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2013 Apr;45(2):192-202
references.pmid: 23150234
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2006 Aug;15(8):673-83
references.pmid: 16287210
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2005 Mar;19(1):86-97
references.pmid: 15796655
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2000 May;19(3):274-82
references.pmid: 10868772
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2004 Dec;18(4):589-99
references.pmid: 15598164
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Nov;33(4):517-23
references.pmid: 11816455
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):579-85
references.pmid: 14629689
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):665-73
references.pmid: 21823795
references.citation: Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 Mar 05;32(2):273-9
references.pmid: 15759065
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):221-5
references.pmid: 3648695
references.citation: Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2006 May;27(4):371-89
references.pmid: 16546936
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2012 Aug;26(4):661-7
references.pmid: 22686265
references.citation: J Behav Med. 1981 Dec;4(4):381-406
references.pmid: 7338894
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18
references.pmid: 472086
references.citation: J Res Pers. 2010 Aug 1;44(4):478-484
references.pmid: 20711512
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;56(4):340-7
references.pmid: 10197829
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Aug;72(4):660-70
references.pmid: 15301651
references.citation: Br J Health Psychol. 2009 Feb;14(Pt 1):49-68
references.pmid: 18435865
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):410-7
references.pmid: 22582338
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):753-62
references.pmid: 21688913
references.citation: Health Psychol. 1996 Mar;15(2):135-48
references.pmid: 8681922
references.citation: Psychooncology. 2009 Nov;18(11):1147-55
references.pmid: 19140125
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):539-41
references.pmid: 20424097
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):106-24
references.pmid: 1388280
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):862-77
references.pmid: 16737378
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;134(1):1-30
references.pmid: 18193993
references.citation: Cancer. 2008 Jun 1;112(11 Suppl):2541-55
references.pmid: 18428202