title: Non-degree allopathic practitioners as first contact points for acute illness episodes: insights from a qualitative study in rural northern India.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In 2005, the Indian government launched the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) to improve the quality of and access to rural public health care. Despite these efforts, recent evidence shows that the rural poor continue to primarily consult private non-degree allopathic practitioners (NDAPs) for acute illness episodes. To examine this phenomenon, we explore the rural poor's perception and utilization of the rural health care system and the role and accessibility of NDAPs therein.
  
  
  METHODS
  Our study is based on qualitative data from focus group discussions conducted in three rural districts in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, two high-focus states of the NRHM in northern India, in 2009/2010. Our study population consists of female micro-credit self-help group members and their male household heads. We apply a directed content analysis and use a theoretical framework to differentiate between physical, financial and cultural access to care.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Our study population distinguishes between "home treatment" (informal self-care), "local treatment" (formally unqualified care) and "outside treatment" (formally qualified care). Because of their proximity, flexible payment options and familiarity with patients' belief systems, among other things, local NDAPs are physically, financially and culturally accessible. They are usually the first contact points for patients before turning to qualified practitioners, and treat minor illnesses, provide first relief, refer patients to other providers and administer formally prescribed treatments.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings are similar for all three study sites and reinforce recent findings from southern and eastern India. The poor's understanding and utilization of the rural health system deviates from governmental ideas. Because of their embeddedness in the community, private NDAPs are the most accessible medical providers and first contact points for acute illness episodes. Thus, they de-facto fulfill the role envisaged by the Indian government for accredited social health activists introduced as part of the NRHM. We conclude that instead of trying to replace NDAPs with public initiatives, the Indian government should regulate, qualify and integrate them as part of the existing public health care system. This way, we argue, India can improve the rural poor's access to formally qualified practitioners.
authors.affiliation: Department for Cooperative Studies, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany. christina.may@uni-koeln.de.
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: May
authors.forename: Katja
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Roth
authors.forename: Pradeep
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Panda
mesh_terms: D000068:Accreditation; D000208:Acute Disease; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D008297:Male; D009313:National Health Programs; D011204:Poverty Areas; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D019035:Rural Health Services; D012424:Rural Population; D012657:Self-Help Groups
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:297-304
references.pmid: 23484865
references.citation: Health Care Anal. 2007 Sep;15(3):223-33
references.pmid: 17922199
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1992 Aug;11(2):199-205; discussion 207-10
references.pmid: 10122979
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 28;11:351
references.pmid: 22204447
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
references.pmid: 16204405
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1992 May;11(1):93-8
references.pmid: 10119759
references.citation: Trials. 2011 Oct 11;12:224
references.pmid: 21988774
references.citation: Natl Med J India. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):163-70
references.pmid: 20949722
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54978
references.pmid: 23405101
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 04;16:1
references.pmid: 26728278
references.citation: Med Care. 1981 Feb;19(2):127-40
references.pmid: 7206846
references.citation: Health Econ Policy Law. 2009 Apr;4(Pt 2):179-93
references.pmid: 19187569
references.citation: Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1953
references.pmid: 22931065
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2014 Dec;29(8):960-74
references.pmid: 24162838
references.citation: Indian J Med Res. 2012 Nov;136(5):868-76
references.pmid: 23287137
references.citation: Indian J Community Med. 2009 Jan;34(1):3-5
references.pmid: 19876447
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:161-71
references.pmid: 17954679
references.citation: Indian Pediatr. 2012 Feb;49(2):136-8
references.pmid: 21992866
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10
references.pmid: 7738325
references.citation: Health Millions. 1994 Feb;2(1):13-6
references.pmid: 12288589
references.citation: Glob Health Action. 2013 Mar 01;6:1-11
references.pmid: 23458089
references.citation: Am Econ Rev. 2004 May 1;94(2):326-330
references.pmid: 19305517
references.citation: Indian J Med Res. 2011 Nov;134(5):627-38
references.pmid: 22199101