title: Constructing core competency indicators for clinical teachers in Taiwan: a qualitative analysis and an analytic hierarchy process.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The objective of this study was to construct a framework of core competency indicators of medical doctors who teach in the clinical setting in Taiwan and to evaluate the relative importance of the indicators among these clinical teachers.
  
  
  METHODS
  The preliminary framework of the indicators was developed from an in-depth interview conducted with 12 clinical teachers who had previously been recognized and awarded for their teaching excellence in university hospitals. The framework was categorized into 4 dimensions: 1) Expertise (i.e., professional knowledge and skill); 2) Teaching Ability; 3) Attitudes and Traits; and 4) Beliefs and Values. These areas were further divided into 11 sub-dimensions and 40 indicators. Subsequently, a questionnaire built upon this qualitative analysis was distributed to another group of 17 clinical teachers. Saaty's eigenvector approach, or the so-called analytic hierarchy process (AHP), was applied to perform the pairwise comparisons between indicators and to determine the ranking and relative importance of the indicators.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fourteen questionnaires were deemed valid for AHP assessment due to completeness of data input. The relative contribution of the four main dimensions was 31% for Attitudes and Traits, 30% for Beliefs and Values, 22% for Expertise, and 17% for Teaching Ability. Specifically, 9 out of the 10 top-ranked indicators belonged to the "Attitudes and Traits" or "Beliefs and Values" dimensions, indicating that inner characteristics (i.e., attitudes, traits, beliefs, and values) were perceived as more important than surface ones (i.e., professional knowledge, skills, and teaching competency).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We performed a qualitative analysis and developed a questionnaire based upon an interview with experienced clinical teachers in Taiwan, and used this tool to construct the key features for the role model. The application has also demonstrated the relative importance in the dimensions of the core competencies for clinical teachers in Taiwan.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Adult and Continuing Education, National Chung-Cheng University, 168 University Road, Min-Hsiung (621), Chia-Yi County, Taiwan. maggyirisli@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Ai-Tzu
authors.initials: AT
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Jou-Wei
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Lin
mesh_terms: D005180:Faculty, Medical / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013624:Taiwan; D013663:Teaching / Q000592:standards
references.citation: Acad Med. 2008 May;83(5):452-66
references.pmid: 18448899
references.citation: J Med Educ. 1981 Mar;56(3):181-6
references.pmid: 7205919
references.citation: J Nurs Care Qual. 2013 Jan-Mar;28(1):60-7
references.pmid: 22732676
references.citation: Acad Med. 1994 Feb;69(2):152-4
references.pmid: 8311888
references.citation: Am J Med. 2000 Feb;108(2):136-42
references.pmid: 11126307
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):707-10
references.pmid: 12351368
references.citation: Acad Med. 2006 Jul;81(7):661-7
references.pmid: 16799294
references.citation: Acad Med. 2005 Apr;80(4):344-8
references.pmid: 15793017
references.citation: Acad Med. 1991 Jan;66(1):54-5
references.pmid: 1985681
references.citation: J Med Educ. 1986 Sep;61(9 Pt 2):35-45
references.pmid: 3746867
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Jul;31(7):634-41
references.pmid: 19513926
references.citation: Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jan-Feb;35(1-2):53-5
references.pmid: 16489387
references.citation: CMAJ. 1998 Oct 6;159(7):765-9
references.pmid: 9805021
references.citation: Med Teach. 2012;34(3):187-91
references.pmid: 22364449
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Mar;31(3):e74-8
references.pmid: 19089730
references.citation: CMAJ. 2002 Sep 17;167(6):638-43
references.pmid: 12358197
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2012 Dec 22;12:127
references.pmid: 23259817
references.citation: J Med Educ. 1978 Oct;53(10):808-15
references.pmid: 712768
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 31;339(27):1986-93
references.pmid: 9869671
references.citation: Fam Med. 2005 Jan;37(1):30-5
references.pmid: 15619153
references.citation: Acad Med. 2000 Aug;75(8):843-5
references.pmid: 10965865
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 May;31(5):390-6
references.pmid: 19811129