title: PLAB and UK graduates' performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess whether international medical graduates passing the two examinations set by the Professional and Linguistic Assessments Board (PLAB1 and PLAB2) of the General Medical Council (GMC) are equivalent to UK graduates at the end of the first foundation year of medical training (F1), as the GMC requires, and if not, to assess what changes in the PLAB pass marks might produce equivalence.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data linkage of GMC PLAB performance data with data from the Royal Colleges of Physicians and the Royal College of General Practitioners on performance of PLAB graduates and UK graduates at the MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations.
  
  
  METHODS
  Doctors in training for internal medicine or general practice in the United Kingdom.
  
  
  METHODS
  7829, 5135, and 4387 PLAB graduates on their first attempt at MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2, and PACES assessments from 2001 to 2012 compared with 18,532, 14,094, and 14,376 UK graduates taking the same assessments; 3160 PLAB1 graduates making their first attempt at the MRCGP AKT during 2007-12 compared with 14,235 UK graduates; and 1411 PLAB2 graduates making their first attempt at the MRCGP CSA during 2010-12 compared with 6935 UK graduates.
  
  
  METHODS
  Performance at MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2, and PACES assessments, and MRCGP AKT and CSA assessments in relation to performance on PLAB1 and PLAB2 assessments, as well as to International English Language Testing System (IELTS) scores. MRCP(UK), MRCGP, and PLAB results were analysed as marks relative to the pass mark at the first attempt.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PLAB1 marks were a valid predictor of MRCP(UK) Part 1, MRCP(UK) Part 2, and MRCGP AKT (r=0.521, 0.390, and 0.490; all P<0.001). PLAB2 marks correlated with MRCP(UK) PACES and MRCGP CSA (r=0.274, 0.321; both P<0.001). PLAB graduates had significantly lower MRCP(UK) and MRCGP assessments (Glass's Δ=0.94, 0.91, 1.40, 1.01, and 1.82 for MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2, and PACES and MRCGP AKT and CSA), and were more likely to fail assessments and to progress more slowly than UK medical graduates. IELTS scores correlated significantly with later performance, multiple regression showing that the effect of PLAB1 (β=0.496) was much stronger than the effect of IELTS (β=0.086). Changes to PLAB pass marks that would result in international medical graduate and UK medical graduate equivalence were assessed in two ways. Method 1 adjusted PLAB pass marks to equate median performance of PLAB and UK graduates. Method 2 divided PLAB graduates into 12 equally spaced groups according to PLAB performance, and compared these with mean performance of graduates from individual UK medical schools, assessing which PLAB groups were equivalent in MRCP(UK) and MRCGP performance to UK graduates. The two methods produced similar results. To produce equivalent performance on the MRCP and MRGP examinations, the pass mark for PLAB1 would require raising by about 27 marks (13%) and for PLAB2 by about 15-16 marks (20%) above the present standard.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  PLAB is a valid assessment of medical knowledge and clinical skills, correlating well with performance at MRCP(UK) and MRCGP. PLAB graduates' knowledge and skills at MRCP(UK) and MRCGP are over one standard deviation below those of UK graduates, although differences in training quality cannot be taken into account. Equivalent performance in MRCGP(UK) and MRCGP would occur if the pass marks of PLAB1 and PLAB2 were raised considerably, but that would also reduce the pass rate, with implications for medical workforce planning. Increasing IELTS requirements would have less impact on equivalence than raising PLAB pass marks.
authors.affiliation: UCL Medical School, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
authors.forename: I C
authors.initials: IC
authors.lastname: McManus
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wakeford
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002568:Certification / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards; D003625:Data Collection; D004521:Educational Measurement; D005260:Female; D005550:Foreign Medical Graduates / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D006113:United Kingdom; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):50-7
references.pmid: 16354141
references.citation: BMJ. 2011 Mar 08;342:d901
references.pmid: 21385802
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jul 30;13:103
references.pmid: 23899223
references.citation: Postgrad Med J. 2012 May;88(1039):249-54
references.pmid: 22331918
references.citation: BMC Med. 2008 Feb 14;6:5
references.pmid: 18275598
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):553-65
references.pmid: 8316613
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2010 Jun 02;10:40
references.pmid: 20525220
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 Sep 26;347:f5662
references.pmid: 24072882
references.citation: BMC Med. 2007 May 03;5:8
references.pmid: 17477862
references.citation: BMC Med. 2012 Jun 14;10:60
references.pmid: 22697599
references.citation: BMJ. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):542-3
references.pmid: 8400976
references.citation: Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Jun;11(3):231-4
references.pmid: 21902073
references.citation: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 May;13(2):203-11
references.pmid: 17043915
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Feb;166(2):124-6
references.pmid: 23149096
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jan 16;15:1
references.pmid: 25592199
references.citation: J R Coll Physicians Lond. 2000 Jan-Feb;34(1):57-60
references.pmid: 10717883
references.citation: Med Teach. 2012;34(7):577-86
references.pmid: 22746963
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e718-25
references.pmid: 24267854
references.citation: Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Mar;83(Pt 1):135-59
references.pmid: 23369179
references.citation: BMC Med. 2013 Nov 14;11:242
references.pmid: 24229333
references.citation: Educ Prim Care. 2012 May;23(3):148-52
references.pmid: 22762872
references.citation: BMJ. 2014 Apr 17;348:g2622
references.pmid: 24742539
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jun 29;9:38
references.pmid: 19563655