title: Is spacing really the "friend of induction"?
abstract: Inductive learning takes place when people learn a new concept or category by observing a variety of exemplars. Kornell and Bjork (2008) asked participants to learn new painting styles either by presenting different paintings of the same artist consecutively (massed presentation) or by mixing paintings of different artists (spaced presentation). In their second experiment, Kornell and Bjork (2008) showed with a final style recognition test, that spacing resulted in better inductive learning than massing. Also, by using this style recognition test, they ruled out the possibility that spacing merely resulted in a better memory for the labels of the newly learned painting styles. The findings from Kornell and Bjork's (2008) second experiment are important because they show that the benefit of spaced learning generalizes to complex learning tasks and outcomes, and that it is not confined to rote memory learning. However, the findings from Kornell and Bjork's (2008) second experiment have never been replicated. In the present study we performed an exact and high-powered replication of Kornell and Bjork's (2008) second experiment with a Web-based sample. Such a replication contributes to establish the reliability of the original finding and hence to more conclusive evidence of the spacing effect in inductive learning. The findings from the present replication attempt revealed a medium-sized advantage of spacing over massing in inductive learning, which was comparable to the original effect in the experiment by Kornell and Bjork (2008). Also, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the effect sizes from both experiments overlapped considerably. Hence, the findings from the present replication experiment and the original experiment clearly reinforce each other.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Peter P J L
authors.initials: PP
authors.lastname: Verkoeijen
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Samantha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bouwmeester
keywords: distributed practice; inductive learning; new statistics; replication; spacing effect
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:188-94
references.pmid: 24589374
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57410
references.pmid: 23516406
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):559-69
references.pmid: 25800521
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):95-111
references.pmid: 23670340
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Oct;109(1):163-7
references.pmid: 18835602
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):585-92
references.pmid: 18578849
references.citation: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):498-503
references.pmid: 20545435
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):392-402
references.pmid: 23138567
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51382
references.pmid: 23300547
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
references.pmid: 17695343
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):847-57
references.pmid: 22829343
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210
references.pmid: 26151629