title: EEG activity represents the correctness of perceptual decisions trial-by-trial.
abstract: Performance monitoring is an executive function, which we depend on for detecting and evaluating the consequences of our behavior. Although event related potentials (ERPs) have revealed the existence of differences after correct and incorrect decisions, it is not known whether there is a trial-by-trial representation of the accuracy of the decision. We recorded the electroencephalographic activity (EEG) while participants performed a perceptual discrimination task, with two levels of difficulty, in which they received immediate feedback. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to reveal two components that convey trial-by-trial representations of the correctness of the decisions. Firstly, the performance monitoring-related negativity (PM-N), a negative deflection whose amplitude is higher (more negative) after incorrect trials. Secondly, the performance monitoring-related positivity (PM-P), a positive deflection whose amplitude is higher after incorrect trials. During the time periods corresponding to these components, trials can be accurately categorized as correct or incorrect by looking at the EEG activity; this categorization is more accurate when based on the PM-P. We further show that the difficulty of the discrimination task has a different effect on each component: after easy trials the latency of the PM-N is shorter and the amplitude of the PM-P is higher than after difficult trials. Consistent with previous interpretations of performance-related ERPs, these results suggest a functional differentiation between these components. The PM-N could be related to an automatic error detection system, responsible for fast behavioral corrections of ongoing actions, while the PM-P could reflect the difference between expected and actual outcomes and be related to long-term changes in the decision process.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina and Complejo Hospitalario Universitario (CHUS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
authors.forename: Jose L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Pardo-Vazquez
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina and Complejo Hospitalario Universitario (CHUS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain ; Departamento de Psicología Social, Básica y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
authors.forename: Isabel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Padrón
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Psicología Social, Básica y Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
authors.forename: José
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fernández-Rey
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina and Complejo Hospitalario Universitario (CHUS), Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
authors.forename: Carlos
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Acuña
keywords: event-related potential (ERP); feedback; perceptual decision-making; performance-monitoring; trial-by-trial
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Aug;39(2):131-43
references.pmid: 50210
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2011 Jun 7;21(11):980-3
references.pmid: 21620706
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):777-87
references.pmid: 16249075
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2009 Nov;73(6):786-93
references.pmid: 19034500
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Dec 1;21(23):9430-7
references.pmid: 11717376
references.citation: Audiol Neurootol. 2000 May-Aug;5(3-4):111-39
references.pmid: 10859408
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 1;51(3):1194-204
references.pmid: 20302950
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):221-32
references.pmid: 20510376
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1995;44:287-96
references.pmid: 7649035
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jun;78(6):447-55
references.pmid: 1712280
references.citation: Brain. 2003 Mar;126(Pt 3):610-22
references.pmid: 12566282
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Sep;17(1):223-30
references.pmid: 12482079
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Oct;48(12):3606-13
references.pmid: 20727905
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 May;46(3):531-8
references.pmid: 19226310
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2003 Nov;40(6):895-903
references.pmid: 14986842
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Apr;25(8):2571-9
references.pmid: 17445253
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 19;28(47):12396-408
references.pmid: 19020032
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Sep;26(6):1714-20
references.pmid: 17880402
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 Mar;41(2):245-53
references.pmid: 15032989
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2006;137(1):13-7
references.pmid: 16343779
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2000 Jan;51(2-3):87-107
references.pmid: 10686361
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18815-9
references.pmid: 19846763
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 17;30(46):15643-53
references.pmid: 21084620
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Nov 3;1296:56-62
references.pmid: 19679114
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):599-611
references.pmid: 16351383
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):913-7
references.pmid: 17640267
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):189-97
references.pmid: 15518935
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Aug 11;1105(1):93-101
references.pmid: 16427615
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):215-33
references.pmid: 15518937
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Apr;16(4):509-18
references.pmid: 16014865
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 1;64(1):26-33
references.pmid: 18549874
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2007 Apr;13(2):160-72
references.pmid: 17404376
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1983 Dec;17(4):241-76
references.pmid: 6661481
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2008 Sep;45(5):688-97
references.pmid: 18513364
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 Sep;38(5):752-60
references.pmid: 11577898
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Jan 8;41(1):165-73
references.pmid: 14715143
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):788-98
references.pmid: 23964600
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2012 Jun;49(6):733-43
references.pmid: 22417070
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 May;15(5):535-44
references.pmid: 15319308
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1790-806
references.pmid: 12736235
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1302-9
references.pmid: 15945130
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):495-501
references.pmid: 16102533
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Nov 07;6:304
references.pmid: 23162451
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;39(1):101-7
references.pmid: 6119966
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):874-91
references.pmid: 17973802
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2013 Apr;93(1):122-31
references.pmid: 23318942
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Feb;108(1):120-33
references.pmid: 10066998
references.citation: Science. 1965 Nov 26;150(3700):1187-8
references.pmid: 5852977
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;22(22):9990-6
references.pmid: 12427856
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2013 Jul;93(3):377-85
references.pmid: 23607999
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):161-70
references.pmid: 15787853
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jul;28(4):441-8
references.pmid: 15289008
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Jul;44(4):579-85
references.pmid: 17437556
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
references.pmid: 12374324
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1637-55
references.pmid: 18345992
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):464-9
references.pmid: 10627622
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1506-17
references.pmid: 20851194
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1993 Jul;35(3):201-24
references.pmid: 8218614
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2009 Nov 25;20(17):1513-7
references.pmid: 19829164
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Jul 14;24(28):6258-64
references.pmid: 15254080
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
references.pmid: 17600525
references.citation: Science. 2002 Mar 22;295(5563):2279-82
references.pmid: 11910116
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2009 Jul;46(4):747-57
references.pmid: 19386045
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84
references.pmid: 6187540
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Feb;49(3):405-15
references.pmid: 21130788
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11730-7
references.pmid: 16354931
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 06;6:204
references.pmid: 22783182
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 1993 Apr;35(2):123-38
references.pmid: 8507742
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Sep;48(11):3343-50
references.pmid: 20655319
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1975 Apr;38(4):387-401
references.pmid: 46819