title: Is Biblioleaks inevitable?
abstract: In 2014, the vast majority of published biomedical research is still hidden behind paywalls rather than open access. For more than a decade, similar restrictions over other digitally available content have engendered illegal activity. Music file sharing became rampant in the late 1990s as communities formed around new ways to share. The frequency and scale of cyber-attacks against commercial and government interests has increased dramatically. Massive troves of classified government documents have become public through the actions of a few. Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. Should we truly expect that biomedical publishing is somehow at less risk than other content-generating industries? What of the larger threat--a "Biblioleaks" event--a database breach and public leak of the substantial archives of biomedical literature? As the expectation that all research should be available to everyone becomes the norm for a younger generation of researchers and the broader community, the motivations for such a leak are likely to grow. We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. a.dunn@unsw.edu.au.
authors.forename: Adam G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Coiera
authors.forename: Kenneth D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Mandl
mesh_terms: D022126:Access to Information / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035843:Biomedical Research; D016494:Computer Security; D003309:Copyright; D006801:Humans; D039781:PubMed; D011643:Publishing
keywords: bibliographic databases; compromising of data; open access; peer-to-peer architectures; public access to information
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Feb 12;20(3):389-98
references.pmid: 14960466
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):791-3
references.pmid: 23445091
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2010 Mar;36(3):130-1
references.pmid: 20211989
references.citation: Cell. 2008 Jul 11;134(1):9-13
references.pmid: 18614002
references.citation: Science. 1985 Feb 1;227(4686):480-4
references.pmid: 3966157
references.citation: FASEB J. 2013 Jul;27(7):2536-41
references.pmid: 23554455
references.citation: Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):185-7
references.pmid: 20510270
references.citation: Source Code Biol Med. 2012 May 28;7(1):7
references.pmid: 22640904
references.citation: J Med Libr Assoc. 2011 Jul;99(3):208-17
references.pmid: 21753913
references.citation: FASEB J. 2011 Jul;25(7):2129-34
references.pmid: 21450907
references.citation: Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5
references.pmid: 24092725
references.citation: BMC Med. 2012 Oct 22;10:124
references.pmid: 23088823
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 21;13(4):e97
references.pmid: 22106169
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Oct 12;345:e6909
references.pmid: 23065357