title: WUSCHEL-related Homeobox genes in Populus tomentosa: diversified expression patterns and a functional similarity in adventitious root formation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  WUSCHEL (WUS)-related homeobox (WOX) protein family members play important roles in the maintenance and proliferation of the stem cell niche in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), root apical meristem (RAM), and cambium (CAM). Although the roles of some WOXs in meristematic cell regulation have been well studied in annual plants such as Arabidopsis and rice, the expression and function of WOX members in woody plant poplars has not been systematically investigated. Here, we present the identification and comprehensive analysis of the expression and function of WOXs in Populus tomentosa.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A genome-wide survey identified 18 WOX encoding sequences in the sequenced genome of Populus trichocarpa (PtrWOXs). Phylogenetic and gene structure analysis revealed that these 18 PtrWOXs fall into modern/WUS, intermediate, and ancient clades, but that the WOX genes in P. trichocarpa may have expanded differently from the WOX genes in Arabidopsis. In the P. trichocarpa genome, no WOX members could be closely classified as AtWOX3, AtWOX6, AtWOX7, AtWOX10, and AtWOX14, but there were two copies of WOX genes that could be classified as PtrWUS, PtrWOX2, PtrWOX4, PtrWOX5, PtrWOX8/9, and PtrWOX11/12, and three copies of WOX genes that could be classified as PtrWOX1 and PtrWOX13. The use of primers specific for each PtrWOX gene allowed the identification and cloning of 18 WOX genes from P. tomentosa (PtoWOXs), a poplar species physiologically close to P. trichocarpa. It was found that PtoWOXs and PtrWOXs shared very high amino acid sequence identity, and that PtoWOXs could be classified identically to PtrWOXs. We revealed that the expression patterns of some PtoWOXs were different to their Arabidopsis counterparts. When PtoWOX5a and PtoWOX11/12a, as well as PtoWUSa and PtoWOX4a were ectopically expressed in transgenic hybrid poplars, the regeneration of adventitious root (AR) was promoted, indicating a functional similarity of these four WOXs in AR regeneration.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This is the first attempt towards a systematical analysis of the function of WOXs in P. tomentosa. A diversified expression, yet functional similarity of PtoWOXs in AR regeneration is revealed. Our findings provide useful information for further elucidation of the functions and mechanisms of WOXs in the development of poplars.
authors.forename: Bobin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Lin
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Jin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Jianbo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Huanquan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Zheng
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Forest Genetics & Biotechnology of Ministry of Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210 037, China. chenjun@caf.ac.cn.
authors.forename: Jun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Mengzhu
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lu
mesh_terms: D021581:Active Transport, Cell Nucleus; D032461:Chromosomes, Plant; D020440:Gene Duplication; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant; D017343:Genes, Plant; D018398:Homeodomain Proteins / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D005810:Multigene Family; D010641:Phenotype; D010802:Phylogeny; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D018520:Plant Shoots / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D032107:Populus / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D011401:Promoter Regions, Genetic; D021381:Protein Transport; D012038:Regeneration / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D018398:Homeodomain Proteins
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Jul;5(7):916-20
references.pmid: 20495368
references.citation: Development. 2005 Feb;132(4):841-9
references.pmid: 15659481
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(1):46-53
references.pmid: 22474686
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 30;105(39):15208-13
references.pmid: 18812507
references.citation: Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):241-3
references.pmid: 1672445
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Apr 12;446(7137):811-4
references.pmid: 17429400
references.citation: Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604
references.pmid: 16973872
references.citation: New Phytol. 2010 Oct;188(1):122-35
references.pmid: 20561212
references.citation: Development. 2004 Feb;131(3):657-68
references.pmid: 14711878
references.citation: Dev Cell. 2008 Jun;14(6):867-76
references.pmid: 18539115
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
references.pmid: 9396791
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2012 Feb;24(2):519-35
references.pmid: 22374393
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Mar 8;15(5):436-40
references.pmid: 15753038
references.citation: Development. 2004 Jun;131(12):2827-39
references.pmid: 15169755
references.citation: Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):211-23
references.pmid: 8044836
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Oct 24;8:291
references.pmid: 18950478
references.citation: Yi Chuan. 2007 Aug;29(8):1023-6
references.pmid: 17681935
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2010 Mar;152(3):1346-56
references.pmid: 20044450
references.citation: Gene. 1993 Dec 15;135(1-2):215-21
references.pmid: 7903947
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2011 Sep;23(9):3247-59
references.pmid: 21926336
references.citation: Cell. 1998 Dec 11;95(6):805-15
references.pmid: 9865698
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Jun;13(3):299-304
references.pmid: 20381410
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2;110(1):366-71
references.pmid: 23248305
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W369-73
references.pmid: 16845028
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Sep;12(9):419-26
references.pmid: 17698401
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):248
references.pmid: 20067590
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
references.pmid: 14530136
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(3):1089-101
references.pmid: 21127025
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2010 Aug;22(8):2618-29
references.pmid: 20729381
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Feb;149(2):841-50
references.pmid: 19073779
references.citation: Development. 2013 May;140(10):2224-34
references.pmid: 23578929
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15;15(24):3355-64
references.pmid: 11751640
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):713-725
references.pmid: 22861491
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2007 Sep 15;309(2):306-16
references.pmid: 17706632
references.citation: EMBO J. 1983;2(11):2027-36
references.pmid: 6416827
references.citation: Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):635-44
references.pmid: 10761929
references.citation: J Integr Plant Biol. 2010 Nov;52(11):1016-26
references.pmid: 20977659
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Jun 9;19(11):909-14
references.pmid: 19398337
references.citation: Plant J. 2013 Jan;73(1):37-49
references.pmid: 22946675
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2013 Jan;161(1):240-51
references.pmid: 23124326
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Aug;26(8):1745-55
references.pmid: 19387013
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2009 Mar;21(3):736-48
references.pmid: 19258439
references.citation: Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Jun;8(3):275-82
references.pmid: 1633570
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2013 Jun 12;13:89
references.pmid: 23758772