title: Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis.
abstract: Wetlands are valuable ecosystems because they harbor a huge biodiversity and provide key services to societies. When natural or human factors degrade wetlands, ecological restoration is often carried out to recover biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). Although such restorations are routinely performed, we lack systematic, evidence-based assessments of their effectiveness on the recovery of biodiversity and ES. Here we performed a meta-analysis of 70 experimental studies in order to assess the effectiveness of ecological restoration and identify what factors affect it. We compared selected ecosystem performance variables between degraded and restored wetlands and between restored and natural wetlands using response ratios and random-effects categorical modeling. We assessed how context factors such as ecosystem type, main agent of degradation, restoration action, experimental design, and restoration age influenced post-restoration biodiversity and ES. Biodiversity showed excellent recovery, though the precise recovery depended strongly on the type of organisms involved. Restored wetlands showed 36% higher levels of provisioning, regulating and supporting ES than did degraded wetlands. In fact, wetlands showed levels of provisioning and cultural ES similar to those of natural wetlands; however, their levels of supporting and regulating ES were, respectively, 16% and 22% lower than in natural wetlands. Recovery of biodiversity and of ES were positively correlated, indicating a win-win restoration outcome. The extent to which restoration increased biodiversity and ES in degraded wetlands depended primarily on the main agent of degradation, restoration actions, experimental design, and ecosystem type. In contrast, the choice of specific restoration actions alone explained most differences between restored and natural wetlands. These results highlight the importance of comprehensive, multi-factorial assessment to determine the ecological status of degraded, restored and natural wetlands and thereby evaluate the effectiveness of ecological restorations. Future research on wetland restoration should also seek to identify which restoration actions work best for specific habitats.
authors.affiliation: Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos A.C., México DF, México; Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: Paula
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Meli
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: José María
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Rey Benayas
authors.affiliation: Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, México.
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Balvanera
authors.affiliation: Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, México.
authors.forename: Miguel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Martínez Ramos
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D053833:Wetlands
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56
references.pmid: 16972878
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9495-500
references.pmid: 18621701
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18619-24
references.pmid: 23091018
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2012 Jan;10(1):e1001247
references.pmid: 22291572
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):572-92
references.pmid: 21613148
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1121-4
references.pmid: 19644076
references.citation: Science. 2006 Nov 3;314(5800):787-90
references.pmid: 17082450
references.citation: Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):575-6
references.pmid: 19644112
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):402-407
references.pmid: 10998517
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20684-9
references.pmid: 18093933
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8
references.pmid: 21592274
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Nov;24(11):599-605
references.pmid: 19683830
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2013 Dec;27(6):1286-93
references.pmid: 24112105
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 7;269(1502):1781-9
references.pmid: 12350265