title: Differential diagnosis of adrenal mass using imaging modality: special emphasis on f-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
abstract: Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal masses serendipitously detected during an imaging study performed for reasons unrelated to suspicion of adrenal disease. The incidence of adrenal incidentalomas has increased because of the widespread use of various imaging modalities. In oncology patients with adrenal incidentalomas, the characterization of the adrenal masses is challenging because nearly 50% of incidental adrenal masses are metastatic lesions that need special medical attention. Although unenhanced computed tomography (CT) densitometry, chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), delayed contrast-enhanced CT and CT histogram analysis have been used as sensitive and specific modalities for differentiating benign from malignant adrenal masses, F-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET)/CT is a highly accurate imaging modality compared to CT or MRI, especially when these two imaging modalities are combined. In addition, a semiquantitative analysis using standardized uptake value ratio further improves the diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant adrenal masses. Thus, F-18 FDG PET/CT is very helpful for determining the best therapeutic management, especially for assessing the need for surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea.
authors.forename: Hong Je
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
authors.forename: Jaetae
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lee
keywords: Adrenal incidentalomas; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multidetector computed tomography
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2001 Dec;42(12):1795-9
references.pmid: 11752075
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):970-7
references.pmid: 16505394
references.citation: Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):117-26
references.pmid: 21330566
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Dec;94(12):4757-67
references.pmid: 19864450
references.citation: Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):743-7
references.pmid: 8756925
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov;191(5):1545-51
references.pmid: 18941099
references.citation: Surgery. 2001 Dec;130(6):1060-7
references.pmid: 11742339
references.citation: Urol Ann. 2012 Sep;4(3):137-44
references.pmid: 23248518
references.citation: Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Dec;23(12):602-9
references.pmid: 23041413
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1649-57
references.pmid: 12760936
references.citation: Radiology. 1999 Jul;212(1):35-41
references.pmid: 10405717
references.citation: Radiology. 1996 Sep;200(3):749-52
references.pmid: 8756926
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):629-33
references.pmid: 11867777
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jul;191(1):234-8
references.pmid: 18562751
references.citation: Eur J Endocrinol. 2011 Jun;164(6):851-70
references.pmid: 21471169
references.citation: Radiographics. 2009 Sep-Oct;29(5):1319-31
references.pmid: 19755598
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):601-10
references.pmid: 17287480
references.citation: Radiographics. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):1811-24; discussion 1824-6
references.pmid: 17102052
references.citation: Radiology. 2000 Dec;217(3):629-32
references.pmid: 11110922
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Aug;37(9):1669-78
references.pmid: 20490488
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):209-16
references.pmid: 21701032
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):956-62
references.pmid: 19304700
references.citation: Acad Radiol. 2007 Apr;14(4):468-75
references.pmid: 17368217
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):2004-15
references.pmid: 21632813
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2004 Dec;45(12):2058-62
references.pmid: 15585482
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):32-7
references.pmid: 16391184
references.citation: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Nov;35(11):2018-25
references.pmid: 18566816