title: Similarity of body size in queens of the wood ant Formica aquilonia from optimal and sub-optimal habitats indicates a strong heritable component.
abstract: Body size in animals is affected by both genes and the environment (e.g., the amount of food resources). In ants, body size is related to several traits in an individual's physiology and life history. For example, a large queen may increase offspring production, thus increasing her overall fitness. In this study, whether sub-optimal environmental conditions affect the body size of queens of the red wood ant, Formica aquilonia Yarrow (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). The sizes (head width in mm) of virgin queens, i.e., gynes, originating from forest interiors (resource rich) and from commercial forest clear-cuts (resource poor) were measured. No differences in the body size of the queens from the two habitats were found. In addition, the within-nest variation in queen size was similar between habitat types. The results indicate that the body size variation of F. aquilonia queens is not sensitive to environmental variation, unlike F. aquilonia workers. The lack of environmental variation in queen size in F. aquilonia may be due to a strong selection in the past to monomorphic size in this obligately polygynous (multi-queened) species.
authors.affiliation: 1 Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, FI-20014 University of Turku, Finland.
authors.forename: Marja-Katariina
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Haatanen
authors.forename: Jouni
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sorvari
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001000:Ants / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D049628:Body Size; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland
references.citation: Environ Entomol. 2008 Feb;37(1):51-6
references.pmid: 18348796
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2005 Sep;14(10):3123-32
references.pmid: 16101778
references.citation: Evolution. 1984 May;38(3):631-643
references.pmid: 28555968
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2552-61
references.pmid: 17263116
references.citation: Evolution. 1999 Apr;53(2):535-545
references.pmid: 28565418
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):324-9
references.pmid: 11308090
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 May 1;16(5):254-260
references.pmid: 11301155
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Sep;57(9):2179-83
references.pmid: 14575338
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 1982 Feb;48(Pt 1):95-106
references.pmid: 6951823
references.citation: Evolution. 2004 May;58(5):1056-63
references.pmid: 15212386
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 Aug;80(2):236-240
references.pmid: 28313113
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Aug;136(4):558-64
references.pmid: 12783299
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2009 Sep;22(9):1906-13
references.pmid: 19682304
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2007 May;94(5):392-5
references.pmid: 17160533
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Jul;87(Pt 1):33-40
references.pmid: 11678985