title: Chemically moderated gamete preferences predict offspring fitness in a broadcast spawning invertebrate.
abstract: Sperm chemoattraction, where sperm locate unfertilized eggs by following a concentration gradient of egg-derived chemoattractants, has been widely documented across numerous taxa. While marine invertebrates are favoured models for understanding the underlying mechanisms of sperm chemoattraction, the evolutionary forces underpinning the process remain enigmatic. Here, we show that in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis), chemically moderated gamete preferences promote assortative fertilizations between genetically compatible gametes. When offered the choice of egg clutches from two females, sperm exhibited consistent but differential 'preferences' for chemical cues secreted from conspecific eggs. Critically, our data reveal that the preferences shown by sperm during the egg-choice trials are highly predictive of early embryonic viability when eggs and sperm from the same individuals are mixed during standard (no-choice) fertilization assays. Moreover, we demonstrate that by experimentally separating chemoattractants from eggs, sperm swimming behaviour is differentially regulated by egg-derived chemoattractants, and that these changes in sperm behaviour are highly consistent with observed patterns of gamete preferences, fertilization and larval survival. Together, this integrated series of experiments reveals that the behaviour of sperm is fine-tuned to respond differentially to the chemical signals emitted from different conspecific eggs, and that these choices have measurable fitness benefits.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, , Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
authors.forename: Mathew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Oliver
authors.forename: Jonathan P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Evans
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002630:Chemotactic Factors / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002633:Chemotaxis; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000187:drug effects; D005260:Female; D005306:Fertilization; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal / Q000187:drug effects*; D049878:Mytilus / Q000502:physiology*; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D002630:Chemotactic Factors
keywords: cryptic female choice; gamete choice; genetic compatibility; sperm attractants; sperm chemotaxis; sperm–egg interaction
references.citation: Biol Bull. 2013 Aug;224(3):166-83
references.pmid: 23995741
references.citation: Oecologia. 2009 Mar;159(2):325-36
references.pmid: 19050932
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S254-6
references.pmid: 14667398
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Mar;62(3):603-11
references.pmid: 18081715
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Oct;19(10):554-9
references.pmid: 16701321
references.citation: Science. 1999 Jan 8;283(5399):217-20
references.pmid: 9880253
references.citation: Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;2(1):80-94
references.pmid: 22408728
references.citation: Rev Reprod. 1999 Jan;4(1):56-66
references.pmid: 10051103
references.citation: Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):619-21
references.pmid: 1865924
references.citation: Am Nat. 2009 Nov;174(5):741-52
references.pmid: 19772439
references.citation: Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2832-8
references.pmid: 17908250
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2000 Aug;9(8):1013-27
references.pmid: 10964221
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Feb;155(1):43-52
references.pmid: 17965888
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9;17(1):32-6
references.pmid: 17208183
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 Jun;64(6):1683-96
references.pmid: 20148959
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 22;279(1739):2855-61
references.pmid: 22438495
references.citation: Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2451-60
references.pmid: 22834744
references.citation: Evolution. 2013 Dec;67(12):3523-36
references.pmid: 24299405
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Jan;59(1):106-12
references.pmid: 15792231
references.citation: Theriogenology. 2007 Feb;67(3):661-72
references.pmid: 17137620
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471-9
references.pmid: 9364787
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 1994 Apr;50(4):774-85
references.pmid: 8199258
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 7;280(1772):20132047
references.pmid: 24266039
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1324-35
references.pmid: 1032893
references.citation: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Apr;7(4):276-85
references.pmid: 16607290
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 30;101(13):4501-6
references.pmid: 15070747
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Jul 13;9:162
references.pmid: 19594896
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Sep 22;264(1386):1271-5
references.pmid: 9332012
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1083-92
references.pmid: 19129124