title: Would you tell everyone this? Facebook conversations as health promotion interventions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Health promotion interventions on social networking sites can communicate individually tailored content to a large audience. User-generated content helps to maximize engagement, but health promotion websites have had variable success in supporting user engagement.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim of our study was to examine which elements of moderator and participant behavior stimulated and maintained interaction with a sexual health promotion site on Facebook.
  
  
  METHODS
  We examined the pattern and content of posts on a Facebook page. Google analytics was used to describe the number of people using the page and viewing patterns. A qualitative, thematic approach was used to analyze content.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During the study period (January 18, 2010, to June 27, 2010), 576 users interacted 888 times with the site through 508 posts and 380 comments with 93% of content generated by users. The user-generated conversation continued while new participants were driven to the site by advertising, but interaction with the site ceased rapidly after the advertising stopped. Conversations covered key issues on chlamydia and chlamydia testing. Users endorsed testing, celebrated their negative results, and modified and questioned key messages. There was variation in user approach to the site from sharing of personal experience and requesting help to joking about sexually transmitted infection. The moderator voice was reactive, unengaged, tolerant, simplistic, and was professional in tone. There was no change in the moderator approach throughout the period studied.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our findings suggest this health promotion site provided a space for single user posts but not a self-sustaining conversation. Possible explanations for this include little new content from the moderator, a definition of content too narrow to hold the interest of participants, and limited responsiveness to user needs. Implications for health promotion practice include the need to consider a life cycle approach to online community development for health promotion and the need for a developing moderator strategy to reflect this. This strategy should reflect two facets of moderation for online health promotion interventions: (1) unengaged and professional oversight to provide a safe space for discussion and to maintain information quality, and (2) a more engaged and interactive presence designed to maintain interest that generates new material for discussion and is responsive to user requests.
authors.affiliation: HIV & Sexual Health Research Group, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Syred
authors.forename: Carla
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Naidoo
authors.forename: Sarah C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Woodhall
authors.forename: Paula
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Baraitser
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002690:Chlamydia Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002692:Chlamydia trachomatis; D005260:Female; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D060728:Reproductive Health; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D061108:Social Media; D060756:Social Networking; D006113:United Kingdom; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: chlamydia; health promotion; social media
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2013 May 17;13:484
references.pmid: 23683345
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Apr 21;340:c1915
references.pmid: 20410164
references.citation: Health Educ Res. 2009 Aug;24(4):646-54
references.pmid: 19251770
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 07;15(6):e112
references.pmid: 23748147
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
references.pmid: 23615206
references.citation: J Sch Health. 2008 Sep;78(9):496-505
references.pmid: 18786042
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e9-18
references.pmid: 23153164
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273-92
references.pmid: 19296777
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1103-5
references.pmid: 11701577
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 21;11:583
references.pmid: 21777470
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e350-7
references.pmid: 18227194
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):e1169-77
references.pmid: 17015505
references.citation: Health Info Libr J. 2007 Mar;24(1):2-23
references.pmid: 17331140
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 06;10(3):e23
references.pmid: 18682374
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jan;163(1):27-34
references.pmid: 19124700