title: Recovery of paretic lower extremity loading ability and physical function in the first six months after stroke.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate poststroke recovery of paretic lower extremity loading, walking ability, and self-reported physical function; and to identify subject characteristics associated with recovery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Inception cohort study, with testing at monthly intervals from 1 to 6 months poststroke.
  
  
  METHODS
  Medical center and research laboratory.
  
  
  METHODS
  Volunteer sample of individuals with first-ever, unilateral, noncerebellar stroke (N=33). A total of 78 individuals underwent screening, and 45 were found to be eligible. Of these, 8 declined participation, 2 were excluded because of deteriorating cognitive status, and 2 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 33 individuals enrolled in the study, and 30 (91%) completed the study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Not applicable.
  
  
  METHODS
  Outcomes were loading of the paretic lower extremity when standing up from a chair, self-selected gait speed (GS), and Physical Functioning Index.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Data analyses using linear mixed models indicated that subjects improved over time for all outcomes. Baseline Fugl-Meyer (FM) lower extremity motor scale score was a predictor of immediate poststroke performance for paretic lower extremity loading and self-selected GS, and a predictor of recovery rate for paretic lower extremity loading. Factors identified as having significant effects on performance at 6 months poststroke were baseline FM lower extremity motor scale score for paretic lower extremity loading and self-selected GS and baseline star cancellation score (from the Behavioral Inattention Test) for paretic lower extremity loading.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Individuals with better baseline paretic lower extremity motor function have better ability to load that extremity during functional activities and faster walking speeds, and these advantages are still present at 6 months poststroke. Individuals with severe visuospatial neglect demonstrate less ability to load the paretic leg during functional activities at 6 months poststroke.
authors.affiliation: Center for Human Movement Science and Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: vmercer@med.unc.edu.
authors.forename: Vicki Stemmons
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Mercer
authors.affiliation: Center for Human Movement Science and Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
authors.forename: Janet Kues
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Freburger
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
authors.forename: Zhaoyu
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Yin
authors.affiliation: Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
authors.forename: John S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Preisser
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000377:Agnosia / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010291:Paresis / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Gait; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Stroke
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1606-10
references.pmid: 6622535
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2007 Dec;87(12):1651-66
references.pmid: 17940102
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):886-95
references.pmid: 15179641
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1993 Jul;73(7):447-54
references.pmid: 8316578
references.citation: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May-Jun;74(3):218-23
references.pmid: 7779333
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):755-62
references.pmid: 15827928
references.citation: Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):281-99
references.pmid: 15502272
references.citation: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
references.pmid: 1135616
references.citation: Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):209-15
references.pmid: 17119299
references.citation: Int Disabil Stud. 1990 Jul-Sep;12(3):95-9
references.pmid: 2096121
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2009 Jul;89(7):653-64
references.pmid: 19465370
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2006 Mar;20(3):262-8
references.pmid: 16634346
references.citation: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;81(10):726-30
references.pmid: 12362111
references.citation: Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S5-12
references.pmid: 23319486
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Oct;81(10):1357-63
references.pmid: 11030501
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Mar;65B(2):174-84
references.pmid: 20051464
references.citation: Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40
references.pmid: 6691052
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):379-84
references.pmid: 10206598
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Jan;76(1):27-32
references.pmid: 7811170
references.citation: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Nov;87(11):910-20
references.pmid: 18936556
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23299
references.pmid: 21853107
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1998 Feb 1;63(3):319-28
references.pmid: 9469722
references.citation: BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4
references.pmid: 1285753
references.citation: J Commun Disord. 2011 Sep-Oct;44(5):515-20
references.pmid: 21600588
references.citation: Eur J Neurol. 2010 Feb;17(2):219-25
references.pmid: 19682061
references.citation: Biometrics. 1982 Dec;38(4):963-74
references.pmid: 7168798
references.citation: Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):15-9
references.pmid: 9143432
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2009 Oct;89(10):1061-71
references.pmid: 19661158
references.citation: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):610-5
references.pmid: 21493090
references.citation: Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1898-902
references.pmid: 9341692
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;90(2):149-56
references.pmid: 20007664
references.citation: Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245
references.pmid: 23239837
references.citation: NeuroRx. 2006 Oct;3(4):505-24
references.pmid: 17012065
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):296-301
references.pmid: 19236983
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):173-9
references.pmid: 17876069
references.citation: NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;14(3):139-150
references.pmid: 11455076
references.citation: Stroke. 1996 Oct;27(10):1812-6
references.pmid: 8841336
references.citation: Stroke. 1997 Jul;28(7):1386-91
references.pmid: 9227688
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2006 May;20(5):438-44
references.pmid: 16774095
references.citation: Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
references.pmid: 1593914
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):306-14
references.pmid: 12017517
references.citation: Gait Posture. 2005 Oct;22(2):126-31
references.pmid: 16139747
references.citation: Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1781-7
references.pmid: 23054237
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(3):267-74
references.pmid: 19074685
references.citation: Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97
references.pmid: 9333350
references.citation: Stroke. 2005 Dec;36(12):2676-80
references.pmid: 16282540
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1250-6
references.pmid: 21807144
references.citation: Clin Rehabil. 2002 Mar;16(2):149-59
references.pmid: 11911513