title: Does transferring three or more embryos make sense for a well-defined population of infertility patients undergoing IVF/ICSI?
abstract: Recently, there has been a marked increase in the use of Single Embryo Transfer (SET) subsequent to In Vitro Fertili-zation (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI), with the aim of reducing the risk of multiple gestations. However, critics have stated that by reducing the number of embryos transferred, a group of women with an a priori reduced chance of pregnancy are at particular greater risk of undertreatment. This group includes women who are of a certain age (≥ 40 years) or have already received a number of - failed - IVF attempts. We wanted to study whether the practice of three or more embryos being transferred would be of added value to these patients and whether the strategy of Heavy Load Transfer (HLT) is likely to boost the pregnancy rates to an acceptable level. We performed both a literature study and a retrospective cohort analysis of 7,850 IVF/ICSI cycles of early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Notwithstanding the limitations associated with this approach, we contend that HLT in the group of patients with poor prognosis should be recommended. This article outlines a suggested protocol within the legal framework relevant to Belgium.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Masschaele
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gerris
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Vandekerckhove
authors.affiliation: Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: De Sutter
keywords: Heavy Load Transfer; advanced maternal age; embryo transfer; multiple gestations; never pregnant prone; subfertility
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2000 Dec;15(12):2621-33
references.pmid: 11098036
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1996 Jan;65(1):103-8
references.pmid: 8557122
references.citation: Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1402-6
references.pmid: 8937279
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2005 Aug;84(2):435-45
references.pmid: 16084887
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;997:93-104
references.pmid: 14644814
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1996 Dec;66(6):969-73
references.pmid: 8941063
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2005 Dec;84(6):1613-9
references.pmid: 16359954
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):491
references.pmid: 20813358
references.citation: Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Jan;8(1):45-58
references.pmid: 14759287
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 1997 Nov;12(11):2542-5
references.pmid: 9436703
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2004 Jul;19(7):1548-53
references.pmid: 15205397
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 2006 Mar;51(3):157-63
references.pmid: 16674009
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):767-76
references.pmid: 18321489
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2202-7
references.pmid: 17562674
references.citation: Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):3-14
references.pmid: 15528214
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1998 Sep;70(3):478-81
references.pmid: 9757876
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):4-8
references.pmid: 15567878
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1998 Dec;70(6):1030-4
references.pmid: 9848290
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2005 Dec;84(6):1637-42
references.pmid: 16359957
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Nov 17;282(19):1832-8
references.pmid: 10573274
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):40-6
references.pmid: 21621770
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 1999 Oct;14(10):2581-7
references.pmid: 10527991
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;177(2):350-5; discussion 355-7
references.pmid: 9290450
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan;87(1):74-6
references.pmid: 17197285
references.citation: J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Oct;18(10):551-6
references.pmid: 11699127
references.citation: Hum Reprod Update. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):261-76
references.pmid: 15831503
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 27;339(9):573-7
references.pmid: 9718375
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2010 Aug;25(8):1851-62
references.pmid: 20570973