title: All competition is not alike: neural mechanisms for resolving underdetermined and prepotent competition.
abstract: People must constantly select among potential thoughts and actions in the face of competition from (a) multiple task-relevant options (underdetermined competition) and (b) strongly dominant options that are not appropriate in the current context (prepotent competition). These types of competition are ubiquitous during language production. In this work, we investigate the neural mechanisms that allow individuals to effectively manage these cognitive control demands and to quickly choose words with few errors. Using fMRI, we directly contrast underdetermined and prepotent competition within the same task (verb generation) for the first time, allowing localization of the neural substrates supporting the resolution of these two types of competition. Using a neural network model, we investigate the possible mechanisms by which these brain regions support selection. Together, our findings demonstrate that all competition is not alike: resolving prepotent competition and resolving underdetermined competition rely on partly dissociable neural substrates and mechanisms. Specifically, activation of left ventrolateral pFC is specific to resolving underdetermined competition between multiple appropriate responses, most likely via competitive lateral inhibition. In contrast, activation of left dorsolateral pFC is sensitive to both underdetermined competition and prepotent competition from response options that are inappropriate in the current context. This region likely provides top-down support for task-relevant responses, which enables them to out-compete prepotent responses in the selection process that occurs in left ventrolateral pFC.
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado, Boulder.
authors.forename: Hannah R
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Snyder
authors.forename: Marie T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Banich
authors.forename: Yuko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Munakata
mesh_terms: D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75
references.pmid: 11301520
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):1-17
references.pmid: 17598730
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):402-8; discussion 409-11
references.pmid: 17048722
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1063-78
references.pmid: 18211237
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Feb 23;1256:92-100
references.pmid: 19111526
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):637-71
references.pmid: 12613671
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:419-51
references.pmid: 15217339
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):22-32
references.pmid: 16417680
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1083-8
references.pmid: 19001571
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70
references.pmid: 12656297
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2014;28(5):893-902
references.pmid: 24295077
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3470-82
references.pmid: 21452939
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Dec;16(6):987-99
references.pmid: 19966248
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16483-8
references.pmid: 20813959
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):453-9
references.pmid: 21889391
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 8;110(41):16390-5
references.pmid: 24062434
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov;26(11):2490-502
references.pmid: 24742191
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14792-7
references.pmid: 9405692
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Aug;16(4):1094-1102
references.pmid: 12202096
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2547-57
references.pmid: 16725162
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Mar;12(3):99-105
references.pmid: 18262825
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e113-25
references.pmid: 21531388
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Jan 25;273(4):302-5
references.pmid: 7815657
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61
references.pmid: 2200075
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jul;22(7):1597-613
references.pmid: 19580383
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Mar;4(1):43-57
references.pmid: 15259888
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1140-57
references.pmid: 19413479
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):2883-901
references.pmid: 17675110
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):167-76
references.pmid: 12747504
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
references.pmid: 11283309
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 22;95(26):15855-60
references.pmid: 9861060
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jan;23(1):168-82
references.pmid: 20146600
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1652-63
references.pmid: 20153763
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):995-1006
references.pmid: 11138768