title: Understanding rising caesarean section trends: relevance of inductions and prelabour obstetric interventions at term.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Single center 10-years audit on the relation between labour ward management and caesarean section rate, with special emphasis on the impact of reduced induction rate and the use of strict criteria for the diagnosis of onset of spontaneous labour and the indication for induction of labour.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective classification of all deliveries between 1st January 2001 and 31st December 2010 in Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk Belgium, into the 10- group classification according to Robson. Numbers and rate of caesarean sections were defined for primiparous and multiparous women in spontaneous labour (groups 1 and 3 respectively), after induced labour (groups 2 and 4 respectively), with caesarean scar uterus (group 5) or with other gestational complications (groups 6 to 10). For these groups, a 10-years evolution was evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In a total of 19.675 deliveries, the overall caesarean section rate increased from 20% (380/1937) in 2001 to 25% (534/2121) in 2007 (p < 0.001), and decreased again to 20% in 2010 (415/2068) (p < 0.001). The increase of caesarean sections before 2007 was associated with an increase of inductions in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term from 28.5% (410/1437) in 2003 to 35.9% (551/1536) in 2006 (p < 0.001). The decrease of caesarean sections after 2007 occurred both in induced labours, as a direct consequence of rationalised reduction of induction rate, and in spontaneous labours, following introduction of strict criteria for diagnosis of labour. Despite a similar caesarean section rate of 20% in 2001 and 2010, the 6.6% (136/2068) repeat caesarean section rate in 2010 was higher than 4.2% (81/1937) in 2001 (p = 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This single centre audit illustrates that increased induction rate is associated with increased caesarean section rate. This evolution can be reverted through a rationalised management aiming for reduction of induced labours and improved diagnosis of labour.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thaens
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bonnaerens
authors.affiliation: Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology, Brussels.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Martens
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Mesens
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Van Holsbeke
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: De Jonge
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium ; Department of Physiology, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Gyselaers
keywords: Caesarean section rate; induction of labour; obstetric management; obstetrics
references.citation: J Nurse Midwifery. 1999 Jul-Aug;44(4):355-69
references.pmid: 10466282
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct;90(10):1094-9
references.pmid: 21679162
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Nov;29(8):714-7
references.pmid: 19821664
references.citation: Women Birth. 2007 Jun;20(2):49-55
references.pmid: 17369116
references.citation: Matern Child Health J. 2010 Sep;14(5):705-712
references.pmid: 19760498
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Apr;89(2):153-7
references.pmid: 10725574
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;172(6):1903-7; discussion 1907-11
references.pmid: 7778651
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;100(1):164-7
references.pmid: 12100818
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 1997 Mar-Apr;112(2):122-32; discussion 133-4
references.pmid: 9071274
references.citation: J Pak Med Assoc. 2008 Aug;58(8):444-8
references.pmid: 18822643
references.citation: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 May;84(5):456-62
references.pmid: 15842210
references.citation: BJOG. 2000 Jul;107(7):909-15
references.pmid: 10901564
references.citation: Rev Med Suisse. 2008 Feb 27;4(146):504-6, 508
references.pmid: 18402401
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Feb;154(2):136-40
references.pmid: 20970238
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994 Mar 31;54(1):13-20
references.pmid: 8045328
references.citation: Birth. 2004 Jun;31(2):148-51
references.pmid: 15153136
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):690-7
references.pmid: 15802392
references.citation: J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Dec;31(8):725-40
references.pmid: 12592192
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006794
references.pmid: 19370654
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):199-205
references.pmid: 8572006
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Apr 28;9:16
references.pmid: 19397827
references.citation: Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):273-7
references.pmid: 21355456
references.citation: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1133-7
references.pmid: 21668323
references.citation: Birth. 2007 Mar;34(1):53-64
references.pmid: 17324180
references.citation: Reprod Health. 2010 Jun 26;7:13
references.pmid: 20579388
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 04;8:3
references.pmid: 18177493
references.citation: Keio J Med. 2008 Mar;57(1):45-9
references.pmid: 18382124
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):35-42
references.pmid: 20567165
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1993 Nov;37(10):1199-218
references.pmid: 8272899
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Jun;50(1):59-64
references.pmid: 8365537
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;94(4):600-7
references.pmid: 10511367
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):287-93
references.pmid: 12907101
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD004907
references.pmid: 18843671
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):308.e1-8
references.pmid: 19733283
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;186(2):240-4
references.pmid: 11854642