title: Investigating the faculty evaluation system in Iranian Medical Universities.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To achieve a valid evaluation of faculty members, it is necessary to develop an inclusive and dynamic system of evaluation addressing all the activities and responsibilities of faculty members. Among these responsibilities, educational activities comprise an important part which needs to be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the current system of evaluating the faculty members' educational duties.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this descriptive cross-sectional study, a checklist for investigating the current evaluation system and was developed confirmed by a focus group. The data for checklist were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire and interview with eight experts of faculty evaluation that worked in different Iranian Medical Universities. For completion of information, the available documents and records were studied. Finally, the current evaluation system of different universities was depicted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The developed checklist had six themes and 123 subthemes. The extracted themes included: Tools, evaluators, processes, appropriateness of faculty field of work with evaluation, feedback status, and university status regarding decisions made based on faculty evaluation results. As for comprehensiveness, all evaluation items except for evaluation and assessment skills and religiosity from personality traits subtheme were fully investigated. The evaluation tools were not enough for different types of education such as clinical education. In six universities, the feedbacks provided were only for making inter/intra department comparison, and no scientific suggestions were included. The results of evaluations were used only for the faculties' promotions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Suitability between evaluation and performance components is a necessity in every evaluation system. The study showed this does not exist in Iranian Universities. For instance, there was no appropriate tool for the evaluation of clinical education. Also, the results of the faculty evaluation were not used for the improvement of their educational performance.
authors.affiliation: Research Center for Social Determinants on Health Promotion, Education Development Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
authors.forename: Farahnaz
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Kamali
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
authors.forename: Nikoo
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Yamani
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
authors.forename: Tahereh
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Changiz
keywords: Education performance; Iran; Medical University; faculty evaluation
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2009 Apr 28;9:18
references.pmid: 19400932
references.citation: J Dent Educ. 2003 Jan;67(1):10-22
references.pmid: 12540101
references.citation: Med Educ. 1998 Nov;32(6):597-606
references.pmid: 10211249
references.citation: Acad Med. 2002 Jan;77(1):15-30
references.pmid: 11788318
references.citation: Am J Occup Ther. 1999 Jan-Feb;53(1):56-63
references.pmid: 9926220
references.citation: Fam Med. 2005 Jan;37(1):43-7
references.pmid: 15619155