title: Unmodified electroconvulsive therapy: a false dilemma.
abstract: A recent statement commissioned by the Indian Association of Private Psychiatry recommends that unmodified electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) should still be used in some settings in India, invoking the principle of beneficence. This paper critically analyses the IAPP statement in terms of both scientific accuracy and ethical principles. It is found that the statement falls short of the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. It is the duty of psychiatrists and psychiatric associations to offer the best available care to their patients, both on scientific and ethical grounds.
authors.affiliation: Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry. raviphilip.r@jipmer.edu.in.
authors.forename: Ravi Philip
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Rajkumar
mesh_terms: D004565:Electroconvulsive Therapy / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*