title: Risk adjustment for smoking identified through tobacco use diagnoses in hospital data: a validation study.
abstract: Adjustment for the differing risk profiles of patients is essential to the use of administrative hospital data for epidemiological research. Smoking is an important factor to include in such adjustments, but the accuracy of the diagnostic codes denoting smoking in hospital records is unknown. The aims of this study were to measure the validity of current smoking and ever smoked status identified from diagnoses in hospital records using a range of algorithms, relative to self-reported smoking status; and to examine whether the misclassification of smoking identified through hospital data is differential or non-differential with respect to common exposures and outcomes. Data from the baseline questionnaire of the 45 and Up Study, completed by 267,153 residents of New South Wales (NSW), Australia, aged 45 years and older, were linked to the NSW Admitted Patient Data Collection. Patients who had been admitted to hospital for an overnight stay between 1 July 2005 and the date of completion of the questionnaire (1 January 2006 to 2 March 2009) were included. Smokers were identified by applying a range of algorithms to hospital admission histories, and compared against self-reported smoking in the questionnaire ('gold standard'). Sensitivities for current smoking ranged from 59% to 84%, while specificities were 94% to 98%. Sensitivities for ever smoked ranged from 45% to 74% and specificities were 93% to 97%. For the majority of algorithms, sensitivities and/or specificities differed significantly according to principal diagnosis, number of comorbidities, socioeconomic status, residential remoteness, Indigenous status, 28 day readmission and 365 day mortality. The identification of smoking through diagnoses in hospital data results in differential misclassification. Risk adjustment based on smoking identified from these data will yield potentially misleading results. Systematic capture of information about smoking in hospital records using a mandatory item would increase the utility of administrative data for epidemiological research.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Alys
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Havard
authors.affiliation: Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Louisa R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Jorm
authors.affiliation: Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Sanja
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lujic
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006753:Hospital Records; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009517:New South Wales / Q000453:epidemiology; D011159:Population Surveillance; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D020379:Risk Adjustment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012907:Smoking; D064424:Tobacco Use
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002;26(3):251-5
references.pmid: 12141621
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;37(5):941-7
references.pmid: 17881411
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Oct;25(5):438-42
references.pmid: 11688624
references.citation: Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1011-9
references.pmid: 17063133
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 23;12:18
references.pmid: 22270080
references.citation: Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr;114(4):837-46
references.pmid: 21372682
references.citation: Med Care. 1999 Nov;37(11):1128-39
references.pmid: 10549615
references.citation: J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
references.pmid: 3558716
references.citation: Addiction. 2003 Sep;98(9):1307-13
references.pmid: 12930218
references.citation: Stroke. 2012 Jan;43(1):79-85
references.pmid: 22076008
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Dec;23(6):654-6
references.pmid: 10641361
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):264-71
references.pmid: 12882949
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1086-93
references.pmid: 8017530
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1989 May;129(5):1062-71
references.pmid: 2705426
references.citation: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;32(4):370-82
references.pmid: 21921601
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1295-304
references.pmid: 15617956
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;65(1):107-15
references.pmid: 21803545
references.citation: Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):151-8
references.pmid: 15917006
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Apr 01;10:26
references.pmid: 20356408
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):275-92
references.pmid: 21762143
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):564-9
references.pmid: 7424903
references.citation: Med J Aust. 2009 Aug 3;191(3):166-8
references.pmid: 19645648
references.citation: Health Policy. 2009 Aug;91(3):321-6
references.pmid: 19250696
references.citation: Circulation. 2013 Feb 19;127(7):811-9
references.pmid: 23319820
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):652-8
references.pmid: 23396545