title: Intracellular performance of tailored nanoparticle tracers in magnetic particle imaging.
abstract: Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) is a quantitative mass-sensitive, tracer-based imaging technique, with potential applications in various cellular imaging applications. The spatial resolution of MPI, in the first approximation, improves by decreasing the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the field-derivative of the magnetization, dm/dH of the nanoparticle (NP) tracers. The FWHM of dm/dH depends critically on NPs' size, size distribution, and their environment. However, there is limited information on the MPI performance of the NPs after their internalization into cells. In this work, 30 to 150μg of the iron oxide NPs were incubated in a lysosome-like acidic buffer (0.2 ml, 20 mM citric acid, pH 4.7) and investigated by vibrating sample magnetometry, magnetic particle spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and dynamic light scattering (DLS). The FWHM of the dm/dH curves of the NPs increased with incubation time and buffer to NPs ratio, consistent with a decrease in the median core size of the NPs from ∼20.1 ± 0.98 to ∼18.5 ± 3.15 nm. Further, these smaller degraded NPs formed aggregates that responded to the applied field by hysteretic reversal at higher field values and increased the FWHM. The rate of core size decrease and aggregation were inversely proportional to the concentration of the incubated NPs, due to their slower biodegradation kinetics. The results of this model experiment show that the MPI performance of the NPs in the acidic environments of the intracellular organelles (i.e., lysosomes and endosomes) can be highly dependent on their rate of internalization, residence time, and degradation.
authors.forename: Hamed
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Arami
authors.forename: Kannan M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Krishnan
references.citation: J Magn Magn Mater. 2009;321(10):1548-1551
references.pmid: 19606261
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2013 May;34(15):3837-45
references.pmid: 23434348
references.citation: J Blood Med. 2012;3:77-85
references.pmid: 22973119
references.citation: Nanoscale. 2013 May 21;5(10):4040-55
references.pmid: 23538400
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 May;34(5):1077-84
references.pmid: 25438306
references.citation: Med Phys. 2011 Mar;38(3):1619-26
references.pmid: 21520874
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e49635
references.pmid: 23272048
references.citation: ACS Nano. 2013 May 28;7(5):3939-52
references.pmid: 23634880
references.citation: IEEE Trans Magn. 2010 Jul 1;46(7):2523-2558
references.pmid: 20930943
references.citation: Small. 2009 Jul;5(14):1637-41
references.pmid: 19334014
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Jun 30;435(7046):1214-7
references.pmid: 15988521
references.citation: Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071904
references.pmid: 23822441
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Nov;29(11):1851-9
references.pmid: 20529726
references.citation: Adv Mater. 2012 Jul 24;24(28):3870-7
references.pmid: 22988557
references.citation: IEEE Trans Magn. 2013 Jul;49(7):3500-3503
references.pmid: 25554710
references.citation: Langmuir. 2007 May 22;23(11):6299-304
references.pmid: 17451262
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Mar 7;54(5):L1-L10
references.pmid: 19204385
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2011 Jun;32(16):3988-99
references.pmid: 21392823