title: Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Clinical trial results registries may contain relevant unpublished information. Our main aim was to investigate the potential impact of the inclusion of reports from industry results registries on systematic reviews (SRs).
  
  
  METHODS
  We identified a sample of 150 eligible SRs in PubMed via backward selection. Eligible SRs investigated randomized controlled trials of drugs and included at least 2 bibliographic databases (original search date: 11/2009). We checked whether results registries of manufacturers and/or industry associations had also been searched. If not, we searched these registries for additional trials not considered in the SRs, as well as for additional data on trials already considered. We reanalysed the primary outcome and harm outcomes reported in the SRs and determined whether results had changed. A "change" was defined as either a new relevant result or a change in the statistical significance of an existing result. We performed a search update in 8/2013 and identified a sample of 20 eligible SRs to determine whether mandatory results registration from 9/2008 onwards in the public trial and results registry ClinicalTrials.gov had led to its inclusion as a standard information source in SRs, and whether the inclusion rate of industry results registries had changed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  133 of the 150 SRs (89%) in the original analysis did not search industry results registries. For 23 (17%) of these SRs we found 25 additional trials and additional data on 31 trials already included in the SRs. This additional information was found for more than twice as many SRs of drugs approved from 2000 as approved beforehand. The inclusion of the additional trials and data yielded changes in existing results or the addition of new results for 6 of the 23 SRs. Of the 20 SRs retrieved in the search update, 8 considered ClinicalTrials.gov or a meta-registry linking to ClinicalTrials.gov, and 1 considered an industry results registry.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The inclusion of industry and public results registries as an information source in SRs is still insufficient and may result in publication and outcome reporting bias. In addition to an essential search in ClinicalTrials.gov, authors of SRs should consider searching industry results registries.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Regine
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Potthast
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Volker
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Vervölgyi
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Natalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: McGauran
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Michaela F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Kerekes
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Beate
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wieseler
authors.affiliation: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kaiser
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004345:Drug Industry; D039781:PubMed; D012042:Registries; D058028:Research Report; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 1986 Oct;4(10):1529-41
references.pmid: 3760920
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD006529
references.pmid: 19588396
references.citation: Trials. 2009 Jul 22;10:56
references.pmid: 19624821
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 18;145(2):81-90
references.pmid: 16847290
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29;289(4):454-65
references.pmid: 12533125
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006117
references.pmid: 19370626
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD004028
references.pmid: 18646098
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):824-30
references.pmid: 19228628
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Jan 03;344:d8141
references.pmid: 22214759
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Oct 12;341:c4737
references.pmid: 20940209
references.citation: Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 Nov;126(6):342-6
references.pmid: 19274323
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 16;351(12):1250-1
references.pmid: 15356289
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 12;361(20):1963-71
references.pmid: 19907043
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 Apr 23;346:f2231
references.pmid: 23613540
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD004367
references.pmid: 19160237
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 Jul 04;347:f4219
references.pmid: 23828897
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 May 20;367(9523):1631-3
references.pmid: 16714166
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):782
references.pmid: 17028106
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000144
references.pmid: 19901971
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):516-23
references.pmid: 12876095
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78
references.pmid: 17388659
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60
references.pmid: 18199864
references.citation: BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):956-8
references.pmid: 15845980
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2013 Oct;10(10):e1001526
references.pmid: 24115912
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000010
references.pmid: 17443631
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
references.pmid: 19621070
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42812
references.pmid: 22916163
references.citation: Trials. 2010 Apr 13;11:37
references.pmid: 20388211
references.citation: Trials. 2009 Dec 16;10:116
references.pmid: 20015404
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Jan 26;336(7637):170
references.pmid: 18219000
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1171-3
references.pmid: 12775615
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Jun 9;334(7605):1177-8
references.pmid: 17548363
references.citation: BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):753
references.pmid: 15681569
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14;356(24):2457-71
references.pmid: 17517853
references.citation: BMJ. 2013 Oct 29;347:f6104
references.pmid: 24169943
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(21):iii, xi-xiii, 1-212
references.pmid: 18485273
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70
references.pmid: 12775614
references.citation: Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):44-6
references.pmid: 18832629
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3081
references.pmid: 18769481