title: Genome analysis of poplar LRR-RLP gene clusters reveals RISP, a defense-related gene coding a candidate endogenous peptide elicitor.
abstract: In plants, cell-surface receptors control immunity and development through the recognition of extracellular ligands. Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like proteins (LRR-RLPs) constitute a large multigene family of cell-surface receptors. Although this family has been intensively studied, a limited number of ligands has been identified so far, mostly because methods used for their identification and characterization are complex and fastidious. In this study, we combined genome and transcriptome analyses to describe the LRR-RLP gene family in the model tree poplar (Populus trichocarpa). In total, 82 LRR-RLP genes have been identified in P. trichocarpa genome, among which 66 are organized in clusters of up to seven members. In these clusters, LRR-RLP genes are interspersed by orphan, poplar-specific genes encoding small proteins of unknown function (SPUFs). In particular, the nine largest clusters of LRR-RLP genes (47 LRR-RLPs) include 71 SPUF genes that account for 59% of the non-LRR-RLP gene content within these clusters. Forty-four LRR-RLP and 55 SPUF genes are expressed in poplar leaves, mostly at low levels, except for members of some clusters that show higher and sometimes coordinated expression levels. Notably, wounding of poplar leaves strongly induced the expression of a defense SPUF gene named Rust-Induced Secreted protein (RISP) that has been previously reported as a marker of poplar defense responses. Interestingly, we show that the RISP-associated LRR-RLP gene is highly expressed in poplar leaves and slightly induced by wounding. Both gene promoters share a highly conserved region of ~300 nucleotides. This led us to hypothesize that the corresponding pair of proteins could be involved in poplar immunity, possibly as a ligand/receptor couple. In conclusion, we speculate that some poplar SPUFs, such as RISP, represent candidate endogenous peptide ligands of the associated LRR-RLPs and we discuss how to investigate further this hypothesis.
authors.affiliation: INRA, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Champenoux, France ; Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Petre
authors.affiliation: INRA, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Champenoux, France ; Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
authors.forename: Stéphane
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hacquard
authors.affiliation: INRA, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Champenoux, France ; Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
authors.forename: Sébastien
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Duplessis
authors.affiliation: INRA, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Champenoux, France ; Université de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres/Microorganismes, UMR 1136 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Rouhier
keywords: gene clustering; immunity; ligands; poplar; receptors; wounding
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun;147(2):503-17
references.pmid: 18434605
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 27;109(13):5110-5
references.pmid: 22416119
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2009 May;14(5):255-63
references.pmid: 19362511
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Apr;28(4):365-9
references.pmid: 20231819
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011 Aug;14(4):351-7
references.pmid: 21636314
references.citation: Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):789-93
references.pmid: 7973631
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Jul 1;36(Web Server issue):W465-9
references.pmid: 18424797
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 11;110(24):10010-5
references.pmid: 23716655
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Aug;15(4):415-23
references.pmid: 22683039
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):10098-103
references.pmid: 16785434
references.citation: Front Plant Sci. 2011 Nov 29;2:88
references.pmid: 22645555
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Aug;15(4):349-57
references.pmid: 22705024
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2007 May;144(1):347-66
references.pmid: 17400708
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jul 19;448(7151):370-4
references.pmid: 17637671
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):611-23
references.pmid: 15955925
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44408
references.pmid: 22952974
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2010 May;5(5):540-2
references.pmid: 20139740
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2012 Aug;24(8):3198-217
references.pmid: 22932676
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1999 Oct;11(10):1925-34
references.pmid: 10521522
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100 Suppl 2:14577-80
references.pmid: 12949264
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2010 Apr 30;285(18):13471-9
references.pmid: 20200150
references.citation: Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1697-700
references.pmid: 12040198
references.citation: Science. 2013 Nov 1;342(6158):624-8
references.pmid: 24114786
references.citation: Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604
references.pmid: 16973872