title: Rich analysis and rational models: inferring individual behavior from infant looking data.
abstract: Studies of infant looking times over the past 50 years have provided profound insights about cognitive development, but their dependent measures and analytic techniques are quite limited. In the context of infants' attention to discrete sequential events, we show how a Bayesian data analysis approach can be combined with a rational cognitive model to create a rich data analysis framework for infant looking times. We formalize (i) a statistical learning model, (ii) a parametric linking between the learning model's beliefs and infants' looking behavior, and (iii) a data analysis approach and model that infers parameters of the cognitive model and linking function for groups and individuals. Using this approach, we show that recent findings from Kidd, Piantadosi and Aslin (iv) of a U-shaped relationship between look-away probability and stimulus complexity even holds within infants and is not due to averaging subjects with different types of behavior. Our results indicate that individual infants prefer stimuli of intermediate complexity, reserving attention for events that are moderately predictable given their probabilistic expectations about the world.
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, USA.
authors.forename: Steven T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Piantadosi
authors.forename: Celeste
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kidd
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Aslin
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011336:Probability; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Cognition. 2005 Mar;95(2):B15-26
references.pmid: 15694642
references.citation: Cognition. 2009 Jul;112(1):97-104
references.pmid: 19435629
references.citation: J Stat Softw. 2010 Jul;35(4):1-81
references.pmid: 21603108
references.citation: Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):121-8
references.pmid: 11890306
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):48-53
references.pmid: 17181699
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47419
references.pmid: 23110071
references.citation: Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1054-9
references.pmid: 21617069
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804
references.pmid: 18087943
references.citation: Child Dev. 1973 Jun;44(2):280-7
references.pmid: 4705555
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1957 Mar;64(2):91-6
references.pmid: 13420283
references.citation: Child Dev. 1976 Mar;47(1):145-54
references.pmid: 954492
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Dec;21(12):1871-7
references.pmid: 21078899
references.citation: Infancy. 2005 Mar;7(2):111-142
references.pmid: 33430550
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Feb;3(2):57-65
references.pmid: 10234228
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):391-402
references.pmid: 21109239
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 Sep;120(3):302-21
references.pmid: 21269608
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan 1;34(1):51-67
references.pmid: 20228968
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;103(3):325-37
references.pmid: 19345956
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15822-6
references.pmid: 12429858
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36399
references.pmid: 22649492
references.citation: Infancy. 2000 Oct;1(4):491-507
references.pmid: 32680296
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1558-68
references.pmid: 17692305
references.citation: Cognition. 1999 Feb 1;70(1):27-52
references.pmid: 10193055
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):287-91
references.pmid: 16807064
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):299-312
references.pmid: 26168520
references.citation: Ann Neurosci. 2013 Oct;20(4):155-6
references.pmid: 25206041
references.citation: Child Dev. 1976 Mar;47(1):155-64
references.pmid: 954493
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2006 Sep;9(5):482-9
references.pmid: 16911450
references.citation: Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8
references.pmid: 8943209
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 1;105(13):5012-5
references.pmid: 18378901
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2005 Jul;112(3):662-668
references.pmid: 16060758
references.citation: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;1(5):658-676
references.pmid: 26271651