title: The 'nonmenstrual woman' in the new millennium? Discourses on menstrual suppression in the first decade of extended cycle oral contraception use in Canada.
abstract: In the early-twenty-first century, extended cycle oral contraception (ECOC) became available by physician prescription in North America. Researchers speculate that this drug, with its capacity to reduce or eliminate menstrual bleeding, may shift not only women's biological processes but also their experiences of menstruation. In this paper, I discuss women's experiences of menstrual suppression drawing on findings from a qualitative study conducted before ECOC was available, and examine these findings against recently published research on menstrual suppression in an ECOC era. Findings suggest that the body as a natural entity figures strongly in women's discourses on suppression. They further suggest that suppression is a contingent, paradoxical and practical achievement, not a securely or fully realised embodied state. This paper reads women's accounts of menstrual suppression prior to ECOC as a challenge to the modern artifice of a mind/body split, and questions whether this challenge is perhaps made less discernible in an ECOC era, where attention may no longer be paid to the daily practices of menstrual suppression. Hence, a case is made for the varied political effects of ongoing non-menstruation versus event-specific practices of non-menstruation.
authors.affiliation: a Department of Sociology , University of Lethbridge , Lethbridge , Canada.
authors.forename: Kara
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Granzow
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002170:Canada; D003276:Contraceptives, Oral; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008598:Menstruation / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000523:psychology*; D009864:Ontario; D034445:Ovulation Inhibition / Q000523:psychology
chemical_list: D003276:Contraceptives, Oral
keywords: ECOC; discourse; feminism; gender; menstrual suppression; the pill