title: A new fiber-optic non-contact compact laser-ultrasound scanner for fast non-destructive testing and evaluation of aircraft composites.
abstract: Laser ultrasonic (LU) inspection represents an attractive, non-contact method to evaluate composite materials. Current non-contact systems, however, have relatively low sensitivity compared to contact piezoelectric detection. They are also difficult to adjust, very expensive, and strongly influenced by environmental noise. Here, we demonstrate that most of these drawbacks can be eliminated by combining a new generation of compact, inexpensive fiber lasers with new developments in fiber telecommunication optics and an optimally designed balanced probe scheme. In particular, a new type of a balanced fiber-optic Sagnac interferometer is presented as part of an all-optical LU pump-probe system for non-destructive testing and evaluation of aircraft composites. The performance of the LU system is demonstrated on a composite sample with known defects. Wide-band ultrasound probe signals are generated directly at the sample surface with a pulsed fiber laser delivering nanosecond laser pulses at a repetition rate up to 76 kHz rate with a pulse energy of 0.6 mJ. A balanced fiber-optic Sagnac interferometer is employed to detect pressure signals at the same point on the composite surface. A- and B-scans obtained with the Sagnac interferometer are compared to those made with a contact wide-band polyvinylidene fluoride transducer.
authors.forename: Ivan
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Pelivanov
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Buma
authors.forename: Jinjun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Xia
authors.forename: Chen-Wei
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Wei
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: O'Donnell
references.citation: Photoacoustics. 2013 Oct 07;1(3-4):54-61
references.pmid: 25302150
references.citation: Appl Phys Lett. 2010 Dec 6;97(23):234104
references.pmid: 21200445
references.citation: Ultrasonics. 2002 May;40(1-8):803-7
references.pmid: 12160048
references.citation: Opt Express. 2011 Jan 17;19(2):861-9
references.pmid: 21263625
references.citation: Ultrasonics. 2010 Feb;50(2):167-71
references.pmid: 19783270
references.citation: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005 Dec;52(12):2220-34
references.pmid: 16463488
references.citation: Opt Lett. 2011 Sep 1;36(17):3449-51
references.pmid: 21886240
references.citation: Appl Opt. 1975 Dec 1;14(12):2809-10
references.pmid: 20155108
references.citation: Ultrasonics. 2008 Nov;48(6-7):488-91
references.pmid: 18649909
references.citation: Opt Express. 2012 Aug 13;20(17):19016-29
references.pmid: 23038542
references.citation: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002 Jun;49(6):767-75
references.pmid: 12080962
references.citation: Appl Opt. 2000 Jul 1;39(19):3276-84
references.pmid: 18349893
references.citation: Opt Express. 2012 Jan 16;20(2):1588-96
references.pmid: 22274501
references.citation: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1986;33(5):485-99
references.pmid: 18291813
references.citation: Appl Phys Lett. 2008 May 12;92(19):193509-1935093
references.pmid: 19479044
references.citation: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2007 May;54(5):957-65
references.pmid: 17523560
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2009 Oct 7;54(19):R59-97
references.pmid: 19724102
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1498-506
references.pmid: 15478415