title: Mental mechanisms for topics identification.
abstract: Topics identification (TI) is the process that consists in determining the main themes present in natural language documents. The current TI modeling paradigm aims at acquiring semantic information from statistic properties of large text datasets. We investigate the mental mechanisms responsible for the identification of topics in a single document given existing knowledge. Our main hypothesis is that topics are the result of accumulated neural activation of loosely organized information stored in long-term memory (LTM). We experimentally tested our hypothesis with a computational model that simulates LTM activation. The model assumes activation decay as an unavoidable phenomenon originating from the bioelectric nature of neural systems. Since decay should negatively affect the quality of topics, the model predicts the presence of short-term memory (STM) to keep the focus of attention on a few words, with the expected outcome of restoring quality to a baseline level. Our experiments measured topics quality of over 300 documents with various decay rates and STM capacity. Our results showed that accumulated activation of loosely organized information was an effective mental computational commodity to identify topics. It was furthermore confirmed that rapid decay is detrimental to topics quality but that limited capacity STM restores quality to a baseline level, even exceeding it slightly.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Royal Military College, Kingston, ON, Canada K7K 7B4.
authors.forename: Louis
authors.identifier: 0000-0001-7295-934X
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Massey
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological
references.citation: Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;3(1):3-17
references.pmid: 25164173
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97
references.pmid: 13310704
references.citation: Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):103-20
references.pmid: 22253184
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2003 Jun-Jul;16(5-6):771-8
references.pmid: 12850033
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Apr;114(2):211-44
references.pmid: 17500626
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 13;5(1):e8622
references.pmid: 20084104
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):703-10
references.pmid: 16447385
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 May;16(5):262-8
references.pmid: 22516238
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):1-37
references.pmid: 17227180
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1974 Jan;2(1):130-8
references.pmid: 24214711