title: Web-based virtual patients in nursing education: development and validation of theory-anchored design and activity models.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Research has shown that nursing students find it difficult to translate and apply their theoretical knowledge in a clinical context. Virtual patients (VPs) have been proposed as a learning activity that can support nursing students in their learning of scientific knowledge and help them integrate theory and practice. Although VPs are increasingly used in health care education, they still lack a systematic consistency that would allow their reuse outside of their original context. There is therefore a need to develop a model for the development and implementation of VPs in nursing education.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a virtual patient model optimized to the learning and assessment needs in nursing education.
  
  
  METHODS
  The process of modeling started by reviewing theoretical frameworks reported in the literature and used by practitioners when designing learning and assessment activities. The Outcome-Present State Test (OPT) model was chosen as the theoretical framework. The model was then, in an iterative manner, developed and optimized to the affordances of virtual patients. Content validation was performed with faculty both in terms of the relevance of the chosen theories but also its applicability in nursing education. The virtual patient nursing model was then instantiated in two VPs. The students' perceived usefulness of the VPs was investigated using a questionnaire. The result was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A virtual patient Nursing Design Model (vpNDM) composed of three layers was developed. Layer 1 contains the patient story and ways of interacting with the data, Layer 2 includes aspects of the iterative process of clinical reasoning, and finally Layer 3 includes measurable outcomes. A virtual patient Nursing Activity Model (vpNAM) was also developed as a guide when creating VP-centric learning activities. The students perceived the global linear VPs as a relevant learning activity for the integration of theory and practice.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Virtual patients that are adapted to the nursing paradigm can support nursing students' development of clinical reasoning skills. The proposed virtual patient nursing design and activity models will allow the systematic development of different types of virtual patients from a common model and thereby create opportunities for sharing pedagogical designs across technical solutions.
authors.affiliation: Center for Learning and Knowledge (CLK), Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics ( LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. carina.georg@ki.se.
authors.forename: Carina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Georg
authors.forename: Nabil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Zary
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003657:Decision Making; D004506:Education, Nursing / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017145:Models, Educational; D016544:Patient Simulation
keywords: clinical reasoning; e-learning, simulation technology; nursing education; patient simulation; virtual patient
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Aug;30(6):515-20
references.pmid: 19948370
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):739-42
references.pmid: 19811211
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):683-4
references.pmid: 19811203
references.citation: Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):303-11
references.pmid: 19335571
references.citation: Simul Healthc. 2012 Feb;7(1):10-7
references.pmid: 22228285
references.citation: J Nurs Educ. 2002 Apr;41(4):145-53
references.pmid: 11954966
references.citation: Int J Aviat Psychol. 1998;8(3):197-208
references.pmid: 11541532
references.citation: Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):580-8
references.pmid: 19493183
references.citation: Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Jun;30(6):312-8; quiz 319-20
references.pmid: 22411409
references.citation: JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88
references.pmid: 21900138
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 06;16(1):e3
references.pmid: 24394603
references.citation: Nurse Educ Pract. 2011 May;11(3):192-8
references.pmid: 20869319
references.citation: Nurs Outlook. 1998 Jan-Feb;46(1):29-36
references.pmid: 9513228
references.citation: Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:e178-85
references.pmid: 19667766
references.citation: Med Teach. 2008;30(2):170-4
references.pmid: 18464142
references.citation: Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2005;2:Article 1
references.pmid: 16646903
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Nov;30(8):809-15
references.pmid: 20409620
references.citation: Nurse Educ Pract. 2008 May;8(3):177-83
references.pmid: 17869587
references.citation: Adv Physiol Educ. 2012 Mar;36(1):48-53
references.pmid: 22383412
references.citation: Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):743-8
references.pmid: 19811212
references.citation: BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 01;12:62
references.pmid: 22853706
references.citation: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Jun;19(5):410-8
references.pmid: 22070549
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 23;16(1):e23
references.pmid: 24463466
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i2-10
references.pmid: 15465951
references.citation: Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1589-602
references.pmid: 20703150