Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
Latent fingerprint examination is a complex task that, despite advances in image processing, still fundamentally depends on the visual judgments of highly trained human examiners. Fingerprints collected from crime scenes typically contain less information than fingerprints collected under controlled conditions. Specifically, they are often noisy and distorted and may contain only a portion of the total fingerprint area. Expertise in fingerprint comparison, like other forms of perceptual expertise, such as face recognition or aircraft identification, depends on perceptual learning processes that lead to the discovery of features and relations that matter in comparing prints. Relatively little is known about the perceptual processes involved in making comparisons, and even less is known about what characteristics of fingerprint pairs make particular comparisons easy or difficult. We measured expert examiner performance and judgments of difficulty and confidence on a new fingerprint database. We developed a number of quantitative measures of image characteristics and used multiple regression techniques to discover objective predictors of error as well as perceived difficulty and confidence. A number of useful predictors emerged, and these included variables related to image quality metrics, such as intensity and contrast information, as well as measures of information quantity, such as the total fingerprint area. Also included were configural features that fingerprint experts have noted, such as the presence and clarity of global features and fingerprint ridges. Within the constraints of the overall low error rates of experts, a regression model incorporating the derived predictors demonstrated reasonable success in predicting objective difficulty for print pairs, as shown both in goodness of fit measures to the original data set and in a cross validation test. The results indicate the plausibility of using objective image metrics to predict expert performance and subjective assessment of difficulty in fingerprint comparisons.
Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Philip J
PJ
Kellman
School of Law, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Jennifer L
JL
Mnookin
Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Gennady
G
Erlikhman
Department of Psychology, St. Joseph's University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Patrick
P
Garrigan
Department of Psychology, Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Tandra
T
Ghose
Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Everett
E
Mettler
Sussex Police, Sussex, United Kingdom.
David
D
Charlton
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Itiel E
IE
Dror
D003878:Dermatoglyphics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012107:Research Design