Meta-analysis of first-line therapies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR-activating mutations.
BACKGROUND
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib have been compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapies for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutations. This meta-analysis compares gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and chemotherapy.


METHODS
Literature search was performed using relevant keywords. Direct and indirect meta-estimates were generated using log-linear mixed-effects models, with random effects for study. Study-to-study heterogeneity was summarized using I statistics and predictive intervals (PIs).


RESULTS
Literature search yielded eight randomized phase 3 clinical trials comparing gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer during the last 5 years. Hazard ratio meta-estimates for progression-free survival were for gefitinib versus chemotherapy 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.63; 95% PI, 0.22-0.88), erlotinib versus chemotherapy 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.42; 95% PI, 0.11-0.55), afatinib versus chemotherapy 0.44 (95% CI, 0.26-0.75; 95% PI, 0.20-0.98), erlotinib versus gefitinib 0.57 (95% CI, 0.30-1.08; 95% PI, 0.24-1.36), afatinib versus gefitinib 1.01 (95% CI, 0.53-1.92; 95% PI, 0.41-2.42), and erlotinib versus afatinib 0.56 (95% CI, 0.27-1.18; 95% PI, 0.22-1.46). Results for overall response rate and disease control rate were similar. There was no evidence that gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy.


CONCLUSIONS
Gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib out-performed chemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival, overall response rate, and disease control rate. Differences among gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib were not statistically significant.
*Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; †Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore; ‡Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore; §Clinical Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ‖Hospital do Coração Cancer Center (HCor Onco), São Paulo, Brazil; and ¶Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Benjamin
B
Haaland
Pui San
PS
Tan
Gilberto
G
de Castro
Gilberto
G
Lopes
D000077716:Afatinib; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000235:genetics; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D066246:ErbB Receptors / Q000235:genetics*; D000069347:Erlotinib Hydrochloride; D000077156:Gefitinib; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000235:genetics; D047428:Protein Kinase Inhibitors / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011799:Quinazolines / Q000627:therapeutic use; D015996:Survival Rate
D047428:Protein Kinase Inhibitors; D011799:Quinazolines; D000077716:Afatinib; D000069347:Erlotinib Hydrochloride; D066246:ErbB Receptors; D000077156:Gefitinib