Two samples for blood transfusion: single centre experience.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the introduction of two-sample policy for transfusion at our hospital and reduction of the risk of ABO incompatible transfusion.


BACKGROUND
ABO incompatible transfusion can be a fatal but avoidable event. Wrong blood in tube is a cause of ABO incompatible transfusion and there are various strategies available to try and expunge this event.


METHODS
Survey of policy/practice before and after the introduction of a two-sample policy.


RESULTS
Staff training is inadequate in reducing the risk of ABO incompatible transfusion. A two-sample policy was introduced and does not significantly increase workload or use of group O blood and does not compromise patient safety by causing delay in blood provision. Post hoc analysis confirms good understanding of the policy by medical staff. Observation of medical staff taking transfusion samples demonstrated consistent deviation from policy, enforcing the need for confirmatory samples.


CONCLUSIONS
A two-sample policy adds an extra layer of safety to transfusion practice and can be introduced without creating new problems.
Haematology Department, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
W
W
Thomas
J
J
Davies
A
A
Asamoah
C
C
Scott-Molloy
V
V
Sansom
J
J
Kerr
D000017:ABO Blood-Group System; D001787:Blood Group Incompatibility / Q000517:prevention & control*; D001803:Blood Transfusion; D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D055991:Health Records, Personal; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012307:Risk Factors
D000017:ABO Blood-Group System
ABO incompatability; WBIT; transfusion safety; two samples