Public moralities and markets in organs.
Schweda and Schicktanz argue that the debate over the ethics of using financial incentives to procure human transplant organs rests on socioempirical premises that need to be critically assessed. They contend that once this is achieved a completely new perspective on the debate should be adopted, with organ donation being viewed primarily as a reciprocal social interaction between donor and recipient. This paper challenges this conclusion, arguing that rather than supporting a new perspective on the debate over the commercial procurement of organs, the observations of Schweda and Schicktanz support the view that human organs should be commercialized.
The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA jtaylor@tcnj.edu.
James Stacey
JS
Taylor
D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000941:ethics*
commerce; commodification; organs; reciprocity; transplant