Prioritization of Potential Mates' History of Sexual Fidelity During a Conjoint Ranking Task.
This series of studies is the first to use conjoint analysis to examine how individuals make trade-offs during mate selection when provided information about a partner's history of sexual infidelity. Across three studies, participants ranked profiles of potential mates, with each profile varying across five attributes: financial stability, physical attractiveness, sexual fidelity, emotional investment, and similarity. They also rated each attribute separately for importance in an ideal mate. Overall, we found that for a long-term mate, participants prioritized a potential partner's history of sexual fidelity over other attributes when profiles were ranked conjointly. For a short-term mate, sexual fidelity, physical attractiveness, and financial stability were equally important, and each was more important than emotional investment and similarity. These patterns contrast with participants' self-reported importance ratings of each individual attribute. Our results are interpreted within the context of previous literature examining how making trade-offs affect mate selection.
Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA jkmogils@oakland.edu.
Justin K
JK
Mogilski
Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA.
T Joel
TJ
Wade
Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Lisa L M
LL
Welling
evolution; judgment and decision making; relationship cognition; romantic relationships