Clinical scientists improving clinical practices: in thoughts and actions.
OBJECTIVE
In this article, the author comments on aspects of Kamhi's (2014) article, which caused the author to think more deeply about definitions of language, theories of learning, and how these two core components of intervention prepare clinical scientists as they search the literature for new knowledge. Interprofessional collaborative practice as a model for team-based intervention in school settings is also discussed.


METHODS
The article addresses aspects of Kamhi's article that aligned or did not align with the author's definition of language and theory of learning and explains why considering these alignments is important for clinical scientists. Two challenges to staying current with the research base are also described, and suggestions are offered for addressing these challenges. Finally, the article provides an overview of interprofessional collaborative practice.


CONCLUSIONS
Clinical scientists should continue to strive to use their knowledge of what language is and how it is learned, combined with the best available scientific information, to best serve their clients. Combining their thoughts and actions, they undoubtedly will continuously improve their clinical practices.
Kenn
K
Apel
D002648:Child; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007805:Language Development Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D007858:Learning; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000458:organization & administration*