Stimulus-response mappings shape inhibition processes: a combined EEG-fMRI study of contextual stopping.
Humans are rarely faced with one simple task, but are typically confronted with complex stimulus constellations and varying stimulus-relevance in a given situation. Through modifying the prototypical stop-signal task and by combined recording and analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we studied the effects of stimulus relevance for the generation of a response or its inhibition. Stimulus response mappings were modified by contextual cues, indicating which of two different stimuli following a go stimulus was relevant for stopping. Overall, response inhibition, that is comparing successful stopping to a stop-signal against go-signal related processes, was associated with increased activity in right inferior and left midfrontal regions, as well as increased EEG delta and theta power; however, stimulus-response conditions in which the most infrequent stop-signal was relevant for inhibition, were associated with decreased activity in regions typically involved in response inhibition, as well as decreased activity in the delta and theta bands as compared to conditions wherein the relevant stop-signal frequency was higher. Behaviorally, this (aforementioned) condition, which demanded inhibition only from the most infrequent stimulus, was also associated with reduced reaction times and lower error rates. This pattern of results does not align with typical stimulus frequency-driven findings and suggests interplay between task relevance and stimulus frequency of the stop-signal. Moreover, with a multimodal EEG-fMRI analysis, we demonstrated significant parameterization for response inhibition with delta, theta and beta time-frequency values, which may be interpreted as reflecting conflict monitoring, evaluative and/or motor processes as suggested by previous work (Huster et al., 2013; Aron, 2011). Further multimodal results suggest a possible neurophysiological and behavioral benefit under conditions whereby the most infrequent stimulus demanded inhibition, indicating that the frequency of the stop-signal interacts with the current stimulus-response contingency. These results demonstrate that response inhibition is prone to influence from other cognitive functions, making it difficult to dissociate real inhibitory capabilities from the influence of moderating mechanisms.
Experimental Psychology Lab, Psychology Department, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christina F
CF
Lavallee
Experimental Psychology Lab, Psychology Department, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Centre Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christoph S
CS
Herrmann
Biological Psychology Lab, Psychology Department, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Riklef
R
Weerda
Experimental Psychology Lab, Psychology Department, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Centre Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
René J
RJ
Huster
D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time; D055815:Young Adult