Historical trauma: politics of a conceptual framework.
The concept of historical trauma (HT) is compelling: Colonialism has set forth cumulative cycles of adversity that promote morbidity and mortality at personal and collective levels, with especially strong mental health impacts. Yet as ongoing community-based as well as scholarly discussions attest, lingering questions continue to surround HT as a framework for understanding the relationships between colonialism and indigenous mental health. Through an overview of 30 recent peer-reviewed publications that aim to clarify, define, measure, and interpret how HT impacts American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) mental health, this paper examines how the conceptual framework of HT has circulated in ways shaped by interactions among three prominent research approaches: evidence-based, culturally relevant, and decolonizing. All define current approaches to AIAN mental health research, but each sets forth different conceptualizations of the connections between colonialism and psychological distress. The unfolding trajectory of research about HT reflects persistent tensions in how these frameworks interact, but also possibilities for better integrating them. These considerations aim to advance conversations about the politics of producing knowledge about AIAN mental health, and support ongoing calls for greater political pluralism in mental health research.
University of Iowa erica-prussing@uiowa.edu.
Erica
E
Prussing
D018595:Colonialism; D054521:Cultural Competency; D018864:Cultural Diversity; D006801:Humans; D007198:Indians, North American / Q000523:psychology*; D008603:Mental Health; D011057:Politics; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D014481:United States
American Indian; cultural competence; decolonization; evidence-based; historical trauma