Negotiated meanings of disability simulations in an adapted physical activity course: learning from student reflections.
Disability simulations have been used as a pedagogical tool to simulate the functional and cultural experiences of disability. Despite their widespread application, disagreement about their ethical use, value, and efficacy persists. The purpose of this study was to understand how postsecondary kinesiology students experienced participation in disability simulations. An interpretative phenomenological approach guided the study's collection of journal entries and clarifying one-on-one interviews with four female undergraduate students enrolled in a required adapted physical activity course. The data were analyzed thematically and interpreted using the conceptual framework of situated learning. Three themes transpired: unnerving visibility, negotiating environments differently, and tomorrow I'll be fine. The students described emotional responses to the use of wheelchairs as disability artifacts, developed awareness of environmental barriers to culturally and socially normative activities, and moderated their discomfort with the knowledge they could end the simulation at any time.
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer
J
Leo
Donna
D
Goodwin
D000328:Adult; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D018953:Kinesiology, Applied / Q000193:education*; D016544:Patient Simulation; D010806:Physical Education and Training / Q000379:methods*; D018794:Problem-Based Learning / Q000379:methods; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012647:Self-Assessment; D013336:Students, Health Occupations / Q000523:psychology*; D014910:Wheelchairs / Q000523:psychology*