In vitro susceptibility test of sitafloxacin against resistant gram-negative bacilli isolated from Thai patients by disk diffusion method.
OBJECTIVE
To determine a correlation of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of sitafloxacin determined by agar dilution method with inhibition zone diameter of sitafloxacin determined by disk diffusion method, and to determine inhibition zone, diameter breakpoints of sitafloxacin against resistant gram-negative bacilli isolated from Thai patients.


METHODS
The study bacteria were 332 clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli including ESBL-producing E. coli, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa andA. baumannii. Each isolate of the present study bacteria was tested for minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of sitafloxacin by agar dilution method and inhibition zone diameter of sitafloxacin by disk diffusion method.


RESULTS
The MICs and inhibition zone diameters of sitafloxacin against gram-negative bacilli were well correlated (correlation coefficient -0.926, p-value < 0.001). The inhibition zone diameter > or = 15 mm had the least total error for determining susceptibility to sitafloxacin based on MIC value of sitafloxacin but the inhibition zone diameter > or = 16 mm had less false susceptibility than that of > or = 15 mm when compared with sitafloxacin MIC < or = 2 mg/l that was considered susceptible. The inhibition zone diameter > or = 19 mm had the least total error for determining susceptibility to sitafloxacin based on MIC value of sitafloxacin but the inhibition zone diameter > or = 18 mm had less false susceptibility than that of > or = 19 mm when compared with sitafloxacin MIC < or = 1 mg/l that was considered susceptible.


CONCLUSIONS
For the susceptibility test of sitafloxacin against resistant gram-negative bacilli by disk diffusion method, the inhibition zone diameter > or = 16 mm and > or = 18 mm seem to be the appropriate breakpoints for susceptibility for resistant gram-negative bacilli isolated from urine and blood, respectively, since the serum concentration of sitafloxacin is rather low whereas the urinary concentration of sitafloxacin is much higher.
Visanu
V
Thamlikitkul
Surapee
S
Tiengrim
D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D052978:Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Tests; D024841:Fluoroquinolones / Q000494:pharmacology*; D006090:Gram-Negative Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D006801:Humans; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests; D013785:Thailand
D024841:Fluoroquinolones; C076246:sitafloxacin