Lineage tracing of resident tendon progenitor cells during growth and natural healing.
Unlike during embryogenesis, the identity of tissue resident progenitor cells that contribute to postnatal tendon growth and natural healing is poorly characterized. Therefore, we utilized 1) an inducible Cre driven by alpha smooth muscle actin (SMACreERT2), that identifies mesenchymal progenitors, 2) a constitutively active Cre driven by growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF5Cre), a critical regulator of joint condensation, in combination with 3) an Ai9 Cre reporter to permanently label SMA9 and GDF5-9 populations and their progeny. In growing mice, SMA9+ cells were found in peritendinous structures and scleraxis-positive (ScxGFP+) cells within the tendon midsubstance and myotendinous junction. The progenitors within the tendon midsubstance were transiently labeled as they displayed a 4-fold expansion from day 2 to day 21 but reduced to baseline levels by day 70. SMA9+ cells were not found within tendon entheses or ligaments in the knee, suggesting a different origin. In contrast to the SMA9 population, GDF5-9+ cells extended from the bone through the enthesis and into a portion of the tendon midsubstance. GDF5-9+ cells were also found throughout the length of the ligaments, indicating a significant variation in the progenitors that contribute to tendons and ligaments. Following tendon injury, SMA9+ paratenon cells were the main contributors to the healing response. SMA9+ cells extended over the defect space at 1 week and differentiated into ScxGFP+ cells at 2 weeks, which coincided with increased collagen signal in the paratenon bridge. Thus, SMA9-labeled cells represent a unique progenitor source that contributes to the tendon midsubstance, paratenon, and myotendinous junction during growth and natural healing, while GDF5 progenitors contribute to tendon enthesis and ligament development. Understanding the mechanisms that regulate the expansion and differentiation of these progenitors may prove crucial to improving future repair strategies.
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Nathaniel A
NA
Dyment
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Yusuke
Y
Hagiwara
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Brya G
BG
Matthews
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America; Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Yingcui
Y
Li
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Ivo
I
Kalajzic
Department of Reconstructive Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
David W
DW
Rowe
D000199:Actins / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D019070:Cell Lineage; D055428:Growth Differentiation Factor 5 / Q000378:metabolism; D008022:Ligaments / Q000166:cytology; D059630:Mesenchymal Stem Cells / Q000378:metabolism*; D051379:Mice; D008822:Mice, Transgenic; D017847:Patellar Ligament / Q000166:cytology / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000293:injuries; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000378:metabolism; D014945:Wound Healing
C558396:Acta2 protein, mouse; D000199:Actins; C525894:Gdf5 protein, mouse; D055428:Growth Differentiation Factor 5