Diagnosis Performance of Different MR Imaging Signs of Cirrhosis: the Caudate to Right Lobe Ratio, the Posterior Right Hepatic Notch, and the Expanded Gallbladder Fossa.
Background & Aims The purpose of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of the C/RL, RPN, and EGF in diagnosing cirrhosis. Methods The study population included 95 cirrhotic patients in the cirrhosis group (56 men, 39 women, age range 14-76;mean age 52.3) and 57 subjects in the control group (26 men, 31 women, age range 18-83;mean age 51). All MR examinations were performed by using the same protocol. Two radiologists independently assessed data sets in two different reading sessions. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and the relative risk of the signs in diagnosing cirrhosis were calculated. The diagnosis accuracy of the C/RL sign was calculated using the ROC curve. The statistical significance of any difference of each sign between different classes of cirrhosis was also calculated. Results The interobserver agreement between the readers was excellent (κ≥ 0.81;95% CI:0.92, 1.0). There was a significant statistical difference of the diagnostic value of C/RL, RPN, and EGF between cirrhotic patients and control group (p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of C/RL were 72%, 87%, and 78%; 67%, 87%, and 75% for RPN; and 49%, 91%, and 65% for EGF. C/RL (OR=18.95) and RPN (OR=14.74) showed a higher risk for cirrhosis compared to EGF (OR=14.74). There was a statistical significance difference between C/RL and EGF (p=0.002) and between RPN and EGF for Child A class of cirrhosis (p-0.037). Conclusion The C/RL and RPN have similar performance regarding the diagnosis of cirrhosis having a higher diagnostic performance compared to EGF in cirrhosis.
Phoenix Diagnostic Clinic, Bucharest.
N
N
Bolog
Phoenix Diagnostic Clinic, Bucharest.
I
I
Oancea
University Hospital, Zurich.
G
G
Andreisek
Phoenix Diagnostic Clinic, Bucharest.
Angelica
A
Mangrau
Institute of Infectious Diseases "Matei Bals", Bucharest.
F
F
Caruntu
Cirrhosis; Liver; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Relative risk