title: Explaining the alluring influence of neuroscience information on scientific reasoning.
abstract: Previous studies have investigated the influence of neuroscience information or images on ratings of scientific evidence quality but have yielded mixed results. We examined the influence of neuroscience information on evaluations of flawed scientific studies after taking into account individual differences in scientific reasoning skills, thinking dispositions, and prior beliefs about a claim. We found that neuroscience information, even though irrelevant, made people believe they had a better understanding of the mechanism underlying a behavioral phenomenon. Neuroscience information had a smaller effect on ratings of article quality and scientist quality. Our study suggests that neuroscience information may provide an illusion of explanatory depth.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
authors.forename: Rebecca E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Rhodes
authors.affiliation: WestEd.
authors.forename: Fernando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rodriguez
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
authors.forename: Priti
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009488:Neurosciences; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult