title: Comparison of mechanical and ultrasound elastic modulus of ovine tibial cortical bone.
abstract: Finite element models of bones can be created by deriving geometry from an X-ray CT scan. Material properties such as the elastic modulus can then be applied using either a single or set of homogeneous values, or individual elements can have local values mapped onto them. Values for the elastic modulus can be derived from the CT density values using an elasticity versus density relationship. Many elasticity-density relationships have been reported in the literature for human bone. However, while ovine in vivo models are common in orthopaedic research, no work has been done to date on creating FE models of ovine bones. To create these models and apply relevant material properties, an ovine elasticity-density relationship needs to be determined. Using fresh frozen ovine tibias the apparent density of regions of interest was determined from a clinical CT scan. The bones were the sectioned into cuboid samples of cortical bone from the regions of interest. Ultrasound was used to determine the elastic modulus in each of three directions - longitudinally, radially and tangentially. Samples then underwent traditional compression testing in each direction. The relationships between apparent density and both ultrasound, and compression modulus in each direction were determined. Ultrasound testing was found to be a highly repeatable non-destructive method of calculating the elastic modulus, particularly suited to samples of this size. The elasticity-density relationships determined in the longitudinal direction were very similar between the compression and ultrasound data over the density range examined. A clear difference was seen in the elastic modulus between the longitudinal and transverse directions of the bone samples, and a transverse elasticity-density relationship is also reported.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: ca.grant@qut.edu.au.
authors.forename: Caroline A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Grant
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Lance J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.affiliation: Science and Engineering Faculty, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Langton
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Devakar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Epari
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003720:Densitometry / Q000379:methods*; D055119:Elastic Modulus / Q000502:physiology; D054459:Elasticity Imaging Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008954:Models, Biological; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012756:Sheep; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013718:Tensile Strength / Q000502:physiology; D013977:Tibia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000502:physiology*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
keywords: Bone; Elastic modulus; Mechanical testing; Ovine; Sheep; Ultrasound