title: Preferences for structured reporting of measurement data: an institutional survey of medical oncologists, oncology registrars, and radiologists.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to determine whether key radiology report "consumers" in our institution prefer structured measurement reporting in a dedicated report section over the current practice of embedding measurements throughout the "Findings" section, given the availability of new tools for quantitative imaging interpretation that enable automated structured reporting of measurement data.
  
  
  METHODS
  Oncologic clinicians and radiologists at our institution were surveyed regarding their preferences for a standard report versus three reports each having uniquely formatted dedicated "Measurements" sections and regarding their impressions of various characteristics of report quality demonstrated by these reports. The online survey was completed by 25 radiologists, 16 oncologists, and 17 oncology nurses and research assistants (registrars).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Aggregation of respondents' preferences by group into single orderings using the Kemeny-Young method revealed that both oncology groups preferred all proposed reports to the standard report but that radiologists only preferred two of the proposed reports to the standard report. All preferences for proposed reports in the two oncology groups were statistically significant based on Wilcoxon tests, but the preference for only one of the proposed reports was significant for radiologists. Additional results suggest that these preferences are driven by respondent favor for the readability of and confidence conveyed by the proposed reports compared to the standard report.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Oncologic clinicians responding to our survey preferred communication of lesion measurements in a separate report section to the current practice of embedding measurements throughout the "Findings" section, based on their assessments of reports containing simulated measurement sections assembled from a single sample report using standardized formatting.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637. Electronic address: adam.travis.md@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Adam R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Travis
authors.affiliation: Clinical Informatics, Philips Research North America, Briarcliff, New York.
authors.forename: Merlijn
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sevenster
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.
authors.forename: Rajiv
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ganesh
authors.affiliation: PCCI-EICI R&D, Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Joost F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Peters
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: Paul J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Chang
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination / Q000379:methods*; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011871:Radiology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011873:Radiology Information Systems / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
keywords: AIM; Annotation and Image Markup; RECIST; Structured reporting; quantitative imaging