title: Anthelmintic resistance in cattle nematodes in the US.
abstract: The first documented case of macrocyclic lactone resistance in gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes of cattle was seen in the US approximately 10 years ago. Since that time the increase incidence of anthelmintic resistance has continued at an alarming rate. Currently parasites of the genera Cooperia and/or Haemonchus resistant to generic or brand-name macrocyclic lactones have be demonstrated in more than half of all operations examined. Both of these parasite genera are capable of causing economic losses by decreasing food intake and subsequently animal productivity. Currently, there are no easy and quick means to detect anthelmintic resistant GI nematodes. Definitive identification requires killing of cattle. The most commonly used field detection method is the fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). This method can be adapted for use as a screening agent for Veterinarians and producers to identify less than desired clearance of the parasites after anthelmintic treatment. Further studies can then define the reasons for persistence of the egg counts. The appearance of anthelmintic resistance is largely due to the development of very effective nematode control programs that have significantly improved the productivity of the US cattle industry, but at the same time has placed a high level of selective pressure on the parasite genome. The challenges ahead include the development of programs that control the anthelmintic resistant nematodes but at the same time result in more sustainable parasite control. The goal is to maintain high levels of productivity but to exert less selective pressures on the parasites. One of the most effective means to slow the development of drug resistance is through the simultaneous use of multiple classes of anthelmintics, each of which has a different mode of action. Reduction of the selective pressure on the parasites can be attained through a more targeted approach to drug treatments where the producer's needs are met by selective treatment of different classes of animals and not by blanket treatment at a location. The implementation of such programs will vary by the sector of the industry and the individual site. In general, the feedlot will be the easiest sector for developing of programs, while stocker/backgrounder operations will provide the most challenging problems. A major question that must be addressed is whether it is important that parasite control programs to be sustainable over time, or if the pharmaceutical industry develop new control agents at a rate sufficient to render sustainability unimportant.
authors.affiliation: Gasbarre Consulting, United States. Electronic address: Lcg190@hughes.net.
authors.forename: Louis C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Gasbarre
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry; D000818:Animals; D000871:Anthelmintics / Q000494:pharmacology* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000469:parasitology*; D003612:Dairying; D004351:Drug Resistance; D009348:Nematoda / Q000187:drug effects*; D009349:Nematode Infections / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000469:parasitology / Q000662:veterinary*; D021261:Parasitic Sensitivity Tests; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D000871:Anthelmintics
keywords: Anthelmintic resistance; Bovine; Cattle; Cows; Drug; Gastrointestinal nematodes