title: Flea (Siphonaptera) species richness in the Great Basin Desert and island biogeography theory.
abstract: Numbers of flea (Siphonaptera) species (flea species richness) on individual mammals should be higher on large mammals, mammals with dense populations, and mammals with large geographic ranges, if mammals are islands for fleas. I tested the first two predictions with regressions of H. J. Egoscue's trapping data on flea species richness collected from individual mammals against mammal size and population density from the literature. Mammal size and population density did not correlate with flea species richness. Mammal geographic range did, in earlier studies. The intermediate-sized (31 g), moderately dense (0.004 individuals/m(2)) Peromyscus truei (Shufeldt) had the highest richness with eight flea species on one individual. Overall, island biogeography theory does not describe the distribution of flea species on mammals in the Great Basin Desert, based on H. J. Egoscue's collections. Alternatively, epidemiological or metapopulation theories may explain flea species richness.
authors.affiliation: Westminster College, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, U.S.A.. bossardtech@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Bossard
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003411:Arvicolinae / Q000469:parasitology; D005589:Foxes / Q000469:parasitology; D008322:Mammals / Q000469:parasitology*; D045969:Mustelidae / Q000469:parasitology; D005423:Siphonaptera / Q000502:physiology*; D001503:Ursidae / Q000469:parasitology
keywords: fleas; host density; host range; host size; island biogeography theory; species richness