Barriers to legal and human rights in Australia in the era of HIV treatment as prevention.
This paper analyses developments and debates regarding legal and human rights issues relevant to the Australian HIV response in the context of treatment as prevention (TasP). A refocusing of prevention priorities on individual responsibilities to 'test and treat' without regard to the legal and human rights context is, we argue, problematic. The paper maintains that the justification of testing and treating for the greater good risks eroding the foundations of a human rights-based approach to HIV prevention, and that the TasP agenda as presently conceived may divert attention from pressing law reform issues relating to sex work, illicit drug use, and criminalization of HIV transmission.
Sally
S
Cameron
John
J
Godwin
D019380:Anti-HIV Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D033161:Government Regulation; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000628:therapy*; D006291:Health Policy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health; D011640:Public Policy; D011477:Sex Work / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
D019380:Anti-HIV Agents