Pellet cryopreservation for chicken semen: effects of sperm working concentration, cryoprotectant concentration, and equilibration time during in vitro processing.
The aim of the study was to standardize the pellet cryopreservation procedure for chicken semen. Mericanel della Brianza male chicken breeders (Italian breed) were used. Pooled semen samples were processed according to the following conditions: (1) dilution in prefreezing extender to 1 versus 1.5 bill cells/mL sperm working concentration (SWC); (2) 6% versus 9% dimethyl acetamide (DMA) concentration (DMAco); (3) 1 versus 30 minutes DMA equilibration (DMAeq) at 4 °C. Sperm viability and motility were assessed in semen (four replicates/treatment) soon after collection (time 0), after DMAeq (time D), and after freezing/thawing (time FT). The recovery rates (%) of viable and motile sperm after freezing/thawing were also calculated. The low SWC (1 bill/mL) and the low DMAco (6%) indicated a positive significant effect on the proportion of motile sperm (1 bill/mL = 53% vs. 1.5 bill/mL = 48%; 6% DMA = 55% vs. 9% DMA = 47%). Very short DMAeq (1 minute) did not significantly change sperm viability during processing (from time 0 to time D) before freezing whatever the DMAco, and, in contrast, the longer DMAeq showed a significant negative effect on sperm viability. The highest proportion of motile sperm was recorded in semen samples diluted to 1 bill/mL and added with 6% DMA; in this condition, DMAeq had no effect (57% 1 minute and 61% 30 minutes). Increasing SWC to 1.5 bill/mL and adding again 6% DMA, a significant effect of DMAeq was observed, and the higher proportion of motile sperm (58% vs. 43%) was recorded after 1 minute DMAeq. A general decrease in sperm motility was shown in semen samples with 9% DMA (47% vs. 55%), and different conditions in SWC and DMAeq were not effective in the prevention of such decrease.
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: luisa.zaniboni@unimi.it.
Luisa
L
Zaniboni
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chiara
C
Cassinelli
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Maria Grazia
MG
Mangiagalli
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, UOS Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Teresa Maria
TM
Gliozzi
Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Silvia
S
Cerolini
D000081:Acetamides / Q000494:pharmacology; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D012661:Semen / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D055101:Semen Analysis / Q000662:veterinary; D012662:Semen Preservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*
D000081:Acetamides; C013959:dimethylacetamide
Chicken; Dimethyl acetamide; Motility; Pellet cryopreservation; Semen; Viability