Illusory line motion is not caused by object-differentiating mechanisms or endogenous attention.
Christie and Klein [2005. Does attention cause illusory line motion? Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 1032-1043] published line motion ratings consistent with illusory line motion (ILM) after peripheral endogenous cues but not central arrow cues. When attention was directed endogenously on the basis of the shape of one of two peripherally presented objects, participants reported small, but significant motion away from the attended object, and this was attributed to participant bias, or to a peripherally directed object-based attention system endogenously recruited to differentiate the peripheral shapes. By using a unique cueing method with identical peripheral markers, but still allowing them to act as cues, the findings of Christie and Klein Experiment 4 were replicated. This reduces the likelihood that object discrimination or object attention mechanisms are responsible for the reported ILM-like effects.
a Psychology and Neuroscience , Dalhousie University , Halifax , NS , Canada.
John
J
Christie
D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D009903:Optical Illusions / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D065855:Spatial Processing
Attention; Endogenous cue; Exogenous cue; Illusory movement; Orienting; Response bias; Visual illusion