Do we need better methods of assessing urethral function: ICI-RS 2013?
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether current methods of urethral function assessment are sufficient for clinical requirement.


METHODS
A summary of the debate held at the 2013 meeting of the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society, with subsequent analysis by the authors.


RESULTS
All reported methods of assessment were reviewed and a summary of reported efficacy and clinical application for each is given. Every method of assessment has limitations as to its use, and in some cases the methods have yet to be proved reliable.


CONCLUSIONS
A gap exists between clinical requirements and the capacity of current urethral function assessments to assist diagnosis. Recommendations are therefore made for future research topics.
Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrew
A
Gammie
Ruud
R
Bosch
Jens Chr
JC
Djurhuus
Ing
I
Goping
Ruth
R
Kirschner-Hermanns
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011312:Pressure; D014521:Urethra / Q000502:physiology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014522:Urethral Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014563:Urodynamics / Q000502:physiology*
assessment; measurement; pressure; urethra