title: The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate whether the policy of increasing National Health Service funding to a greater extent in deprived areas in England compared with more affluent areas led to a reduction in geographical inequalities in mortality amenable to healthcare.
  
  
  METHODS
  Longitudinal ecological study.
  
  
  METHODS
  324 lower tier local authorities in England, classified by their baseline level of deprivation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Differential trends in NHS funds allocated to local areas resulting from the NHS resource allocation policy in England between 2001 and 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  Trends in mortality from causes considered amenable to healthcare in local authority areas in England. Using multivariate regression, we estimated the reduction in mortality that was associated with the allocation of additional NHS resources in these areas.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between 2001 and 2011 the increase in NHS resources to deprived areas accounted for a reduction in the gap between deprived and affluent areas in male mortality amenable to healthcare of 35 deaths per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval 27 to 42) and female mortality of 16 deaths per 100,000 (10 to 21). This explained 85% of the total reduction of absolute inequality in mortality amenable to healthcare during this time. Each additional £10 m of resources allocated to deprived areas was associated with a reduction in 4 deaths in males per 100,000 (3.1 to 4.9) and 1.8 deaths in females per 100,000 (1.1 to 2.4). The association between absolute increases in NHS resources and improvements in mortality amenable to healthcare in more affluent areas was not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Between 2001 and 2011, the NHS health inequalities policy of increasing the proportion of resources allocated to deprived areas compared with more affluent areas was associated with a reduction in absolute health inequalities from causes amenable to healthcare. Dropping this policy may widen inequalities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK benbarr@liverpool.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Ben
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Barr
authors.affiliation: Department of Geography, Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University, Stockton on Tees, UK.
authors.forename: Clare
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bambra
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Policy, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.
authors.forename: Margaret
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Whitehead
mesh_terms: D004739:England; D005260:Female; D005380:Financing, Government; D006291:Health Policy; D054625:Healthcare Disparities / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D009026:Mortality / Q000639:trends*; D011204:Poverty Areas; D040841:Resource Allocation / Q000191:economics*; D012737:Sex Factors; D013222:State Medicine / Q000191:economics*