title: Investigating the performance of AIC in selecting phylogenetic models.
abstract: The popular likelihood-based model selection criterion, Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), is a breakthrough mathematical result derived from information theory. AIC is an approximation to Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence with the derivation relying on the assumption that the likelihood function has finite second derivatives. However, for phylogenetic estimation, given that tree space is discrete with respect to tree topology, the assumption of a continuous likelihood function with finite second derivatives is violated. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the expected log likelihood of a candidate model, and the expected KL divergence in the context of phylogenetic tree estimation. We find that given the tree topology, AIC is an unbiased estimator of the expected KL divergence. However, when the tree topology is unknown, AIC tends to underestimate the expected KL divergence for phylogenetic models. Simulation results suggest that the degree of underestimation varies across phylogenetic models so that even for large sample sizes, the bias of AIC can result in selecting a wrong model. As the choice of phylogenetic models is essential for statistical phylogenetic inference, it is important to improve the accuracy of model selection criteria in the context of phylogenetics.
authors.forename: Dwueng-Chwuan
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Jhwueng
authors.forename: Snehalata
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Huzurbazar
authors.forename: Brian C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: O'Meara
authors.forename: Liang
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Liu
mesh_terms: D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010802:Phylogeny; D018401:Sample Size