title: The (dis)unity of nursing science.
abstract: This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as an adequate philosophy of science. Combined with the need to establish nursing as an autonomous profession, nursing theory's use of logical empiricism has led to serious conceptual problems. Philosophers of science have also rejected many of the central tenets of logical empiricism, including its focus on the logical justification of theories and the idea that science is, or should be, unified. Instead, there has been an increasing focus on the practice of science, which in turn has led to a pluralist understanding of science that emphasizes the construction of scientific models that are appropriate for certain purposes or in certain contexts. I suggest that this approach to philosophy of science may provide better resources for nursing science.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
authors.forename: Robyn L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Bluhm
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005544:Forecasting; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D009732:Nursing Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000523:psychology* / Q000639:trends; D009740:Nursing Staff / Q000523:psychology*; D009742:Nursing Theory; D015279:Organizational Culture; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing / Q000266:history*
keywords: epistemology; philosophy of science; positivism