title: New trends in assessing the outcomes of mental health interventions.
abstract: Assessing the outcomes of interventions in mental health care is both important and challenging. The aim of this paper is to advance the field of outcomes research by proposing a taxonomy of the decisions that clinicians and researchers need to consider when evaluating outcomes. Our taxonomy has eight components, framed as decisions: Whose outcome will be considered? Which scientific stage is being investigated? What outcome domain(s) matter? What level of assessment will be used? Will clinical and/or recovery outcomes be assessed? Whose perspective will be considered? Will deficits and/or strengths be the focus? Will invariant or individualized measures be preferred? We propose a future focus on understanding what matters most to people using mental health services, and on the use of measures rated by service users as the primary approach to evaluating outcome.
authors.affiliation: King's College London, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
authors.forename: Graham
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Thornicroft
authors.forename: Mike
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Slade
keywords: Outcomes research; assessment measures; mental health services research