title: Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation.
abstract: Original interpretations of fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns equated FHR decelerations with 'fetal distress', requiring expeditious delivery. This simplistic interpretation is still implied in our clinical guidelines despite 40 years of increasing understanding of the behaviour and regulation of the fetal cardiovascular system during labour. The physiological basis of FHR responses and adaptations to oxygen deprivation is de-emphasised, whilst generations of obstetricians and midwives are trained to focus on, and classify, the morphological appearances of decelerations into descriptive categories, with no attempt to understand how the fetus defends itself and compensates for intrapartum hypoxic ischaemic insults, or the patterns that suggest progressive loss of compensation. Consequently, there is a lack of confidence, marked variation in FHR interpretation, defensive practices, unnecessary operative interventions, and a failure to recognise abnormal FHR patterns, resulting in adverse outcomes and expensive litigation.
authors.affiliation: St George's Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ugwumadu
mesh_terms: D000138:Acidosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D005316:Fetal Distress / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D005311:Fetal Hypoxia / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005323:Fetal Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006340:Heart Rate, Fetal / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007743:Labor, Obstetric / Q000502:physiology; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011247:Pregnancy
keywords: CTG practice algorithm; deceleration; fetal cardiovascular physiology; intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring