title: How (not) to argue about is/ought inferences in the cognitive sciences.
authors.affiliation: Department of International Strategy and Marketing, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Katinka J P
authors.initials: KJ
authors.lastname: Quintelier
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: Lieuwe
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Zijlstra
keywords: defeasible reasoning; deontic reasoning; deontic “oughts”; epistemic “oughts”; is/ought gap; is/ought inferences; naturalistic fallacy