title: Developing the radiation protection safety culture in the UK.
abstract: In the UK, as elsewhere, there is potential to improve how radiological challenges are addressed through improvement in, or development of, a strong radiation protection (RP) safety culture. In preliminary work in the UK, two areas have been identified as having a strong influence on UK society: the healthcare and nuclear industry sectors. Each has specific challenges, but with many overlapping common factors. Other sectors will benefit from further consideration.In order to make meaningful comparisons between these two principal sectors, this paper is primarily concerned with cultural aspects of RP in the working environment and occupational exposures rather than patient doses.The healthcare sector delivers a large collective dose to patients each year, particularly for diagnostic purposes, which continues to increase. Although patient dose is not the focus, it must be recognised that collective patient dose is inevitably linked to collective occupational exposure, especially in interventional procedures.The nuclear industry faces major challenges as work moves from operations to decommissioning on many sites. This involves restarting work in the plants responsible for the much higher radiation doses of the 1960/70s, but also performing tasks that are considerably more difficult and hazardous than those original performed in these plants.Factors which influence RP safety culture in the workplace are examined, and proposals are considered for a series of actions that may lead to an improvement in RP culture with an associated reduction in dose in many work areas. These actions include methods to improve knowledge and awareness of radiation safety, plus ways to influence management and colleagues in the workplace. The exchange of knowledge about safety culture between the nuclear industry and medical areas may act to develop RP culture in both sectors, and have a wider impact in other sectors where exposures to ionising radiations can occur.
authors.affiliation: Radiation Protection Office, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cole
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hallard
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Broughton
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Coates
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Croft
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Devine
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Marsden
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Marsh
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: McGeary
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Riley
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rogers
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Rycraft
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shaw
mesh_terms: D001938:Brazil; D005602:France; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D019981:Health Care Sector / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006293:Health Promotion / Q000458:organization & administration*; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants; D015279:Organizational Culture; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000592:standards*; D017751:Safety Management / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006113:United Kingdom