title: How does a carnivore guild utilise a substantial but unpredictable anthropogenic food source? Scavenging on hunter-shot ungulate carcasses by wild dogs/dingoes, red foxes and feral cats in south-eastern Australia revealed by camera traps.
abstract: There is much interest in understanding how anthropogenic food resources subsidise carnivore populations. Carcasses of hunter-shot ungulates are a potentially substantial food source for mammalian carnivores. The sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) is a large (≥ 150 kg) exotic ungulate that can be hunted throughout the year in south-eastern Australia, and hunters are not required to remove or bury carcasses. We investigated how wild dogs/dingoes and their hybrids (Canis lupus familiaris/dingo), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cats (Felis catus) utilised sambar deer carcasses during the peak hunting seasons (i.e. winter and spring). We placed carcasses at 1-km intervals along each of six transects that extended 4-km into forest from farm boundaries. Visits to carcasses were monitored using camera traps, and the rate of change in edible biomass estimated at ∼ 14-day intervals. Wild dogs and foxes fed on 70% and 60% of 30 carcasses, respectively, but feral cats seldom (10%) fed on carcasses. Spatial and temporal patterns of visits to carcasses were consistent with the hypothesis that foxes avoid wild dogs. Wild dog activity peaked at carcasses 2 and 3 km from farms, a likely legacy of wild dog control, whereas fox activity peaked at carcasses 0 and 4 km from farms. Wild dog activity peaked at dawn and dusk, whereas nearly all fox activity occurred after dusk and before dawn. Neither wild dogs nor foxes remained at carcasses for long periods and the amount of feeding activity by either species was a less important predictor of the loss of edible biomass than season. Reasons for the low impacts of wild dogs and foxes on sambar deer carcass biomass include the spatially and temporally unpredictable distribution of carcasses in the landscape, the rapid rate of edible biomass decomposition in warm periods, low wild dog densities and the availability of alternative food resources.
authors.affiliation: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Forsyth
authors.affiliation: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Luke
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Woodford
authors.affiliation: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Paul D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Moloney
authors.affiliation: Ecotone Wildlife Veterinary Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
authors.forename: Jordan O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Hampton
authors.affiliation: Invasive Plants and Animals Branch, Biosecurity Division, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Andrew P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Woolnough
authors.affiliation: Melbourne Water, Reefton, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tucker
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild / Q000502:physiology; D060435:Carnivory; D002415:Cats / Q000502:physiology; D003670:Deer / Q000502:physiology; D004285:Dogs / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005502:Food; D005589:Foxes / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D013021:South Australia; D014741:Video Recording