title: [Pitfalls in informed consent: a statistical analysis of malpractice law suits].
abstract: In medical malpractice law suits, the notion of informed consent is often relevant in assessing whether negligence can be attributed to the medical practitioner who has caused injury to a patient. Furthermore, it is not rare that courts award damages for a lack of appropriate informed consent alone. In this study, two results were arrived at from a statistical analysis of medical malpractice law suits. One, unexpectedly, was that the severity of a patient's illness made no significant difference to whether damages were awarded. The other was that cases of typical medical treatment that national medical insurance does not cover were involved significantly more often than insured treatment cases. In cases where damages were awarded, the courts required more disclosure and written documents of information by medical practitioners, especially about complications and adverse effects that the patient might suffer.
authors.forename: Junko
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Echigo
mesh_terms: D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007564:Japan; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*