title: Regulatory mechanisms that prevent re-initiation of DNA replication can be locally modulated at origins by nearby sequence elements.
abstract: Eukaryotic cells must inhibit re-initiation of DNA replication at each of the thousands of origins in their genome because re-initiation can generate genomic alterations with extraordinary frequency. To minimize the probability of re-initiation from so many origins, cells use a battery of regulatory mechanisms that reduce the activity of replication initiation proteins. Given the global nature of these mechanisms, it has been presumed that all origins are inhibited identically. However, origins re-initiate with diverse efficiencies when these mechanisms are disabled, and this diversity cannot be explained by differences in the efficiency or timing of origin initiation during normal S phase replication. This observation raises the possibility of an additional layer of replication control that can differentially regulate re-initiation at distinct origins. We have identified novel genetic elements that are necessary for preferential re-initiation of two origins and sufficient to confer preferential re-initiation on heterologous origins when the control of re-initiation is partially deregulated. The elements do not enhance the S phase timing or efficiency of adjacent origins and thus are specifically acting as re-initiation promoters (RIPs). We have mapped the two RIPs to ∼ 60 bp AT rich sequences that act in a distance- and sequence-dependent manner. During the induction of re-replication, Mcm2-7 reassociates both with origins that preferentially re-initiate and origins that do not, suggesting that the RIP elements can overcome a block to re-initiation imposed after Mcm2-7 associates with origins. Our findings identify a local level of control in the block to re-initiation. This local control creates a complex genomic landscape of re-replication potential that is revealed when global mechanisms preventing re-replication are compromised. Hence, if re-replication does contribute to genomic alterations, as has been speculated for cancer cells, some regions of the genome may be more susceptible to these alterations than others.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Christopher D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Richardson
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Joachim J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D018797:Cell Cycle Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000235:genetics; D018844:Cyclin-Dependent Kinases / Q000378:metabolism; D004261:DNA Replication / Q000235:genetics*; D004271:DNA, Fungal / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D014644:Genetic Variation; D016681:Genome, Fungal; D064110:Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D011401:Promoter Regions, Genetic / Q000235:genetics*; D018741:Replication Origin / Q000235:genetics; D016196:S Phase / Q000235:genetics; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000235:genetics*; D029701:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins / Q000096:biosynthesis
chemical_list: C066503:CDC6 protein, S cerevisiae; D018797:Cell Cycle Proteins; D004271:DNA, Fungal; D029701:Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins; D018844:Cyclin-Dependent Kinases; D064110:Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins