title: 3D tumor models: history, advances and future perspectives.
abstract: Evaluation of cancer therapeutics by utilizing 3D tumor models, before clinical studies, could be more advantageous than conventional 2D tumor models (monolayer cultures). The 3D systems mimic the tumor microenvironment more closely than 2D systems. The following review discusses the various 3D tumor models present today with the advantages and limitations of each. 3D tumor models replicate the elements of a tumor microenvironment such as hypoxia, necrosis, angiogenesis and cell adhesion. The review introduces application of techniques such as microfluidics, imaging and tissue engineering to improve the 3D tumor models. Despite their tremendous potential to better screen chemotherapeutics, 3D tumor models still have a long way to go before they are used commonly as in vitro tumor models in pharmaceutical industrial research.
authors.affiliation: MCPHS University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
authors.forename: Parul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Benien
authors.forename: Archana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Swami
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002448:Cell Adhesion / Q000502:physiology; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D044085:Microfluidics / Q000379:methods; D008954:Models, Biological; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology*; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000379:methods; D059016:Tumor Microenvironment / Q000502:physiology
keywords: 3D co-culture; angiogenesis; cancer; hypoxia; invasion; microenvironment; microfluidics; spheroids; stem cells; tumors