title: Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Interdisciplinary teamwork (ITW) is designed to promote the active participation of several disciplines in delivering comprehensive cancer care to patients. ITW provides mechanisms to support continuous communication among care providers, optimize professionals' participation in clinical decision-making within and across disciplines, and foster care coordination along the cancer trajectory. However, ITW mechanisms are not activated optimally by all teams, resulting in a gap between desired outcomes of ITW and actual outcomes observed. The aim of the present study is to identify the conditions underlying outcome production by ITW in local oncology teams.
  
  
  METHODS
  This retrospective multiple case study will draw upon realist evaluation principles to explore associations among context, mechanisms and outcomes (CMO). The cases are nine interdisciplinary cancer teams that participated in a previous study evaluating ITW outcomes. Qualitative data sources will be used to construct a picture of CMO associations in each case. For data collection, reflexive focus groups will be held to capture patients' and professionals' perspectives on ITW, using the guiding question, 'What works, for whom, and under what circumstances?' Intra-case analysis will be used to trace associations between context, ITW mechanisms, and patient outcomes. Inter-case analysis will be used to compare the different cases' CMO associations for a better understanding of the phenomenon under study.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This multiple case study will use realist evaluation principles to draw lessons about how certain contexts are more or less likely to produce particular outcomes. The results will make it possible to target more specifically the actions required to optimize structures and to activate the best mechanisms to meet the needs of cancer patients. This project could also contribute significantly to the development of improved research methods for conducting realist evaluations of complex healthcare interventions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use CMO associations to improved empirical and theoretical understanding of interdisciplinary teamwork in oncology, and its results could foster more effective implementation in clinical practice.
authors.affiliation: Charles-Le Moyne Hospital Research Centre, Greenfield Park, QC J4K 0A8, Canada. dominique.tremblay2@usherbrooke.ca.
authors.forename: Dominique
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tremblay
authors.forename: Nassera
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Touati
authors.forename: Danièle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Roberge
authors.forename: Jean-Louis
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Denis
authors.forename: Annie
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Turcotte
authors.forename: Benoît
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Samson
mesh_terms: D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003142:Communication; D003657:Decision Making; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011792:Quebec; D012107:Research Design; D012189:Retrospective Studies