title: Tissue engineering in animal models for urinary diversion: a systematic review.
abstract: Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) approaches may provide alternatives for gastrointestinal tissue in urinary diversion. To continue to clinically translatable studies, TERM alternatives need to be evaluated in (large) controlled and standardized animal studies. Here, we investigated all evidence for the efficacy of tissue engineered constructs in animal models for urinary diversion. Studies investigating this subject were identified through a systematic search of three different databases (PubMed, Embase and Web of Science). From each study, animal characteristics, study characteristics and experimental outcomes for meta-analyses were tabulated. Furthermore, the reporting of items vital for study replication was assessed. The retrieved studies (8 in total) showed extreme heterogeneity in study design, including animal models, biomaterials and type of urinary diversion. All studies were feasibility studies, indicating the novelty of this field. None of the studies included appropriate control groups, i.e. a comparison with the classical treatment using GI tissue. The meta-analysis showed a trend towards successful experimentation in larger animals although no specific animal species could be identified as the most suitable model. Larger animals appear to allow a better translation to the human situation, with respect to anatomy and surgical approaches. It was unclear whether the use of cells benefits the formation of a neo urinary conduit. The reporting of the methodology and data according to standardized guidelines was insufficient and should be improved to increase the value of such publications. In conclusion, animal models in the field of TERM for urinary diversion have probably been chosen for reasons other than their predictive value. Controlled and comparative long term animal studies, with adequate methodological reporting are needed to proceed to clinical translatable studies. This will aid in good quality research with the reduction in the use of animals and an increase in empirical evidence of biomedical research.
authors: Department of Urology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Marije
authors: M
authors: Sloff
authors: SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal experimentation), Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Rob
authors: R
authors: de Vries
authors: Department of Urology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Geutjes
authors: Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Joanna
authors: J
authors: IntHout
authors: SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal experimentation), Central Animal Laboratory, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Merel
authors: M
authors: Ritskes-Hoitinga
authors: Department of Urology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Egbert
authors: E
authors: Oosterwijk
authors: Department of Urology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors: Wout
authors: W
authors: Feitz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D006801:Humans; D023421:Models, Animal; D013045:Species Specificity; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000379:methods*; D014547:Urinary Diversion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*