title: Rich, white, and vulnerable: rethinking oppressive socialization in the euthanasia debate.
abstract: Anita Silvers (1998) has criticized those who argue that members of marginalized groups are vulnerable to a special threat posed by physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE). She argues that paternalistic measures prohibiting PAS/VAE in order to protect these groups only serve to marginalize them further by characterizing them as belonging to a definitively weak class. I offer a new conception of vulnerability, one that demonstrates how rich, educated, white males, who are typically regarded as having their autonomy enhanced by their social status, are just as, if not more, vulnerable to threats posed by PAS/VAE as a result of the harmful social messages at work just below the surface of contemporary Western culture. I use this new conception of vulnerability to reinforce arguments for continued statutory prohibitions on PAS/VAE.
authors: Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, USA ekrag@siue.edu.
authors: Erik
authors: E
authors: Krag
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D005065:Euthanasia / Q000941:ethics; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D008571:Men; D026706:Paternalism / Q000941:ethics; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D044469:Racial Groups; D012951:Socialization; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics* / Q000208:ethnology; D035862:Vulnerable Populations
keywords: euthanasia; socialization; vulnerability