title: Is "efficiency" a useful concept in cognitive neuroscience?
abstract: It is common in the cognitive neuroscience literature to explain differences in activation in terms of differences in the "efficiency" of neural function. I argue here that this usage of the concept of efficiency is empty and simply redescribes activation differences rather than providing a useful explanation of them. I examine a number of possible explanations for differential activation in terms of task performance, neuronal computation, neuronal energetics, and network organization. While the concept of "efficiency" is vacuous as it is commonly employed in the neuroimaging literature, an examination of brain development in the context of neural coding, neuroenergetics, and network structure provides a roadmap for future investigation, which is fundamental to an improved understanding of developmental effects and group differences in neuroimaging signals.
authors: University of Texas, Imaging Research Center, 100 East 24th Street, R9975, Austin, TX 78712, United States. Electronic address: poldrack@utexas.edu.
authors: Russell A
authors: RA
authors: Poldrack
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D004526:Efficiency; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D019303:Multilingualism; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology*; D009431:Neural Conduction; D059906:Neuroimaging / Q000379:methods; D009488:Neurosciences; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
keywords: Metabolism; Networks; Neural Energetics; Neuroimaging; Response Time; fMRI