title: Anatomical eponyms, part 1: to look on the bright side.
abstract: The use of eponyms in medical sciences generally, and in anatomy specifically, remains controversial. In principle, this discussion should have been concluded as far back as 1895 (publication of the first Nomina anatomica): all eponyms should have been removed from the anatomical vocabulary then. In practice, what was believed to be a mere formality proved much more difficult to apply. Most eponyms remain in current use; moreover, their number goes on increasing. Assuming that there's no smoke without fire, we wondered why it seems impossible to get rid of a specific kind of term. The aim of this article and its successor is to weigh up the pros and cons.
authors: Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
authors: Regis
authors: R
authors: Olry
mesh_terms: D000715:Anatomy / Q000379:methods*; D004850:Eponyms; D006801:Humans
keywords: anatomical vocabulary; controversial; eponyms