title: Measurement and modeling of phosphorous transport in shallow groundwater environments.
abstract: Leaching of phosphorus (P) from agricultural soils, especially those that are sandy, is adversely impacting P-limited ecosystems like Florida's Everglades. A more developed understanding of P and water management strategies and their effects on P leaching is needed to achieve reductions in subsurface P losses, especially from intensively managed dual cropping systems under plastic mulch in shallow water regions. We compared the effects of conservation P and water management strategies with traditional practices on P transport to groundwater. A 3-year experiment was conducted on hydrologically isolated plots with plastic-mulched successive cropping systems to compare high (HEI) and soil test based recommended (REI) external input (water and fertilizer P) systems with traditional sub-irrigation (seepage), and REI with a potential water conservation subsurface drip irrigation system (REI-SD) with regard to groundwater P concentrations above and below the low conductivity spodic horizon (Bh). The REI treatments had higher available storage for rainfall and P than HEI. Use of both REI systems (REI=2098μg/L and REI-SD=2048μg/L) reduced groundwater P concentrations above the Bh horizon by 33% compared to HEI (3090μg/L), and results were significant at the 0.05 level. Although the subsurface drip system saved water, it did not offer any groundwater quality (P) benefit. Mixing and dilution of influent P below the low conductivity Bh horizon between treatments and with the regional groundwater system resulted in no significant differences in groundwater P concentration below the Bh horizon. Groundwater P concentrations from this study were higher than reported elsewhere due to low soil P storage capacity (SPSC), high hydraulic conductivity of sandy soils, and a high water table beneath crop beds. The HEI system leached more P due to ferilizer P in excess of SPSC and used higher irrigation volumes compared with REI systems. Despite a 40% difference in the average amount of added fertilizer P between HEI (187kg P2O5/ha) and REI (124kg P2O5/ha), soil Mehlich 1 P (M1P) values were similar for both systems while they received Pinput. Soil M1P for REI and REI-SD increased to a maximum of 55mg/kg while they received Pinput, and then gradually decreased after Pinput ceased. However, M1P for HEI increased steadily to a maximum of 145mg/kg by the end of the study with continued Pinput. Mehlich-1 P measured six years after the study still showed relatively high levels of P, a legacy effect of Pinput. The main factors influencing groundwater P concentration varied by seasons. During fall with frequent rainfall, the concentrations were influenced mainly by M1P and Pinput, and highlight a need for greater focus on Pinput management (vs. water management) during this season. However, during the dry period of spring, a greater focus on irrigation management is required since depth to water table and rainfall also become contributing factors. Three multivariate models (r(2)=0.67 to 0.93), for spring, fall, and annual periods, were developed for predicting groundwater P concentrations for a wide range of water and P inputs (0 to 191kg P2O5/ha of Pinput). The uniqueness of these models is that they use readily available hydrologic (rainfall and water table depth), management (Pinput), and soil (M1P) data commonly monitored by growers when managing water and nutrient inputs on agricultural landscapes. The development of similar models may not be necessary for other agro-ecosystems in similar regions since long-term data collected in these regions may be applied, with verification, to the models presented here.
authors: Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department & Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 2685 State Road 29N, Immokalee, FL 34142, USA. Electronic address: hendrick@ufl.edu.
authors: G S
authors: GS
authors: Hendricks
authors: Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department & Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 2685 State Road 29N, Immokalee, FL 34142, USA. Electronic address: sshukla@ufl.edu.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Shukla
authors: Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, 2181 McCarty Hall, P.O. Box 110290, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: obreza@ufl.edu.
authors: T A
authors: TA
authors: Obreza
authors: Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, 2181 McCarty Hall, P.O. Box 110290, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. Electronic address: apatite@ufl.edu.
authors: W G
authors: WG
authors: Harris
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D018556:Crops, Agricultural; D017753:Ecosystem; D005308:Fertilizers / Q000032:analysis*; D005431:Florida; D060587:Groundwater / Q000737:chemistry*; D008956:Models, Chemical; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000032:analysis*; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D005308:Fertilizers; D012987:Soil; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D010758:Phosphorus
keywords: Flatwoods soils; Groundwater phosphorus; Phosphorus leaching; Phosphorus model; Seepage irrigation; vegetable production