title: Examining the ethical and social issues of health technology design through the public appraisal of prospective scenarios: a study protocol describing a multimedia-based deliberative method.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The design of health technologies relies on assumptions that affect how they will be implemented, such as intended use, complexity, impact on user autonomy, and appropriateness. Those who design and implement technologies make several ethical and social assumptions on behalf of users and society more broadly, but there are very few tools to examine prospectively whether such assumptions are warranted and how the public define and appraise the desirability of health innovations. This study protocol describes a three-year study that relies on a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations that will enable a critical examination of the social and ethical issues of health technology design.
  
  
  METHODS
  The first two steps of our mixed-method study were completed: relying on a literature review and the support of our multidisciplinary expert committee, we developed scenarios depicting social and technical changes that could unfold in three thematic areas within a 25-year timeframe; and for each thematic area, we created video clips to illustrate prospective technologies and short stories to describe their associated dilemmas. Using this multimedia material, we will: conduct four face-to-face deliberative workshops with members of the public (n=40) who will later join additional participants (n=25) through an asynchronous online forum; and analyze and integrate three data sources: observation, group deliberations, and a self-administered participant survey.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study protocol will be of interest to those who design and assess public involvement initiatives and to those who examine the implementation of health innovations. Our premise is that using user-friendly tools in a deliberative context that foster participants' creativity and reflexivity in pondering potential technoscientific futures will enable our team to analyze a range of normative claims, including some that may prove problematic and others that may shed light over potentially more valuable design options. This research will help fill an important knowledge gap; intervening earlier in technological development could help reduce undesirable effects and inform the design and implementation of more appropriate innovations.
authors: Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal, Institute of Public Health Research of University of Montreal (IRSPUM), Montreal, Canada. pascale.lehoux@umontreal.ca.
authors: Pascale
authors: P
authors: Lehoux
authors: Philippe
authors: P
authors: Gauthier
authors: Bryn
authors: B
authors: Williams-Jones
authors: Fiona A
authors: FA
authors: Miller
authors: Jennifer R
authors: JR
authors: Fishman
authors: Myriam
authors: M
authors: Hivon
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Vachon
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D019212:Multimedia; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011639:Public Opinion; D018581:Technology Transfer