title: Further optimization of the reliability of the 28-joint disease activity score in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) combines scores on a 28-tender and swollen joint count (TJC28 and SJC28), a patient-reported measure for general health (GH), and an inflammatory marker (either the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or the C-reactive protein [CRP]) into a composite measure of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study examined the reliability of the DAS28 in patients with early RA using principles from generalizability theory and evaluated whether it could be increased by adjusting individual DAS28 component weights.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients were drawn from the DREAM registry and classified into a "fast response" group (N = 466) and "slow response" group (N = 80), depending on their pace of reaching remission. Composite reliabilities of the DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP were determined with the individual components' reliability, weights, variances, error variances, correlations and covariances. Weight optimization was performed by minimizing the error variance of the index.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Composite reliabilities of 0.85 and 0.86 were found for the DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP, respectively, and were approximately equal across patients groups. Component reliabilities, however, varied widely both within and between sub-groups, ranging from 0.614 for GH ("slow response" group) to 0.912 for ESR ("fast response" group). Weight optimization increased composite reliability even further. In the total and "fast response" groups, this was achieved mostly by decreasing the weight of the TJC28 and GH. In the "slow response" group, though, the weights of the TJC28 and SJC28 were increased, while those of the inflammatory markers and GH were substantially decreased.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The DAS28-ESR and the DAS28-CRP are reliable instruments for assessing disease activity in early RA and reliability can be increased even further by adjusting component weights. Given the low reliability and weightings of the general health component across subgroups it is recommended to explore alternative patient-reported outcome measures for inclusion in the DAS28.
authors: Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
authors: Liseth
authors: L
authors: Siemons
authors: Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
authors: Peter M
authors: PM
authors: ten Klooster
authors: Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
authors: Harald E
authors: HE
authors: Vonkeman
authors: Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Rheumatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
authors: Mart A F J
authors: MA
authors: van de Laar
authors: Department of Research Methodology, Measurement and Data Analysis, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
authors: Cees A W
authors: CA
authors: Glas
mesh_terms: D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D018450:Disease Progression; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index