title: Rectification is required to extract oscillatory envelope modulation from surface electromyographic signals.
abstract: Rectification of surface electromyographic (EMG) recordings prior to their correlation with other signals is a widely used form of preprocessing. Recently this practice has come into question, elevating the subject of EMG rectification to a topic of much debate. Proponents for rectifying suggest it accentuates the EMG spike timing information, whereas opponents indicate it is unnecessary and its nonlinear distortion of data is potentially destructive. Here we examine the necessity of rectification on the extraction of muscle responses, but for the first time using a known oscillatory input to the muscle in the form of electrical vestibular stimulation. Participants were exposed to sinusoidal vestibular stimuli while surface and intramuscular EMG were recorded from the left medial gastrocnemius. We compared the unrectified and rectified surface EMG to single motor units to determine which method best identified stimulus-EMG coherence and phase at the single-motor unit level. Surface EMG modulation at the stimulus frequency was obvious in the unrectified surface EMG. However, this modulation was not identified by the fast Fourier transform, and therefore stimulus coherence with the unrectified EMG signal failed to capture this covariance. Both the rectified surface EMG and single motor units displayed significant coherence over the entire stimulus bandwidth (1-20 Hz). Furthermore, the stimulus-phase relationship for the rectified EMG and motor units shared a moderate correlation (r = 0.56). These data indicate that rectification of surface EMG is a necessary step to extract EMG envelope modulation due to motor unit entrainment to a known stimulus.
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
authors.forename: Christopher J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Dakin
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
authors.forename: Brian H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Dalton
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
authors.forename: Billy L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Luu
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Brain Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Institute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada jsblouin@mail.ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Jean-Sébastien
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Blouin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004576:Electromyography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009046:Motor Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D058585:Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: EMG preprocessing; motor unit; oscillatory input; rectification; vestibular stimuli