title: Open exchange of scientific knowledge and European copyright: The case of biodiversity information.
abstract: Background. The 7(th) Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development is helping the European Union to prepare for an integrative system for intelligent management of biodiversity knowledge. The infrastructure that is envisaged and that will be further developed within the Programme "Horizon 2020" aims to provide open and free access to taxonomic information to anyone with a requirement for biodiversity data, without the need for individual consent of other persons or institutions. Open and free access to information will foster the re-use and improve the quality of data, will accelerate research, and will promote new types of research. Progress towards the goal of free and open access to content is hampered by numerous technical, economic, sociological, legal, and other factors. The present article addresses barriers to the open exchange of biodiversity knowledge that arise from European laws, in particular European legislation on copyright and database protection rights. We present a legal point of view as to what will be needed to bring distributed information together and facilitate its re-use by data mining, integration into semantic knowledge systems, and similar techniques. We address exceptions and limitations of copyright or database protection within Europe, and we point to the importance of data use agreements. We illustrate how exceptions and limitations have been transformed into national legislations within some European states to create inconsistencies that impede access to biodiversity information. Conclusions. The legal situation within the EU is unsatisfactory because there are inconsistencies among states that hamper the deployment of an open biodiversity knowledge management system. Scientists within the EU who work with copyright protected works or with protected databases have to be aware of regulations that vary from country to country. This is a major stumbling block to international collaboration and is an impediment to the open exchange of biodiversity knowledge. Such differences should be removed by unifying exceptions and limitations for research purposes in a binding, Europe-wide regulation.
authors.affiliation: Plazi, Zinggstrasse 16, 3007 Berne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Willi
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Egloff
authors.affiliation: Plazi, Zinggstrasse 16, 3007 Berne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Patterson
authors.affiliation: Plazi, Zinggstrasse 16, 3007 Berne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Donat
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Agosti
authors.affiliation: Plazi, Zinggstrasse 16, 3007 Berne, Switzerland ; Museum für Naturkunde, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Gregor
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hagedorn
keywords: Biodiversity knowledge; European copyright; European database protection right; Open Access to data and information; data use agreement; intellectual property rights; taxonomy