title: Median-evoked somatosensory potentials in severe brain injury: does initial loss of cortical potentials exclude recovery?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  In patients with severe brain injury (SBI) median-evoked somatosensory potentials (M-SSEP) serve as a prognostic tool. Bilateral loss of cortical responses (BLCR) is usually thought to be a reliable marker of poor prognosis. Prognostic accuracy to predict a poor outcome depends on the cause of coma and is best in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) reaching almost 100% which is in contrast to patients with other etiologies of coma, especially traumatic brain injury (TBI). Only little evidence exists on the possibility of electrophysiological recovery of BLCR in repeated or serial SSEP-examinations and detailed functional outcome in these cases.
  
  
  METHODS
  28 patients (78.6% male, 21.4% female, mean age 43.1±18.6 years) from our in-patient early (post-acute) neurorehabilitation center with BLCR in their first M-SSEP were re-examined after a mean interval of 66±55.8 days. SBI was caused by different etiologies. We retrospectively analyzed (a) the recovery rate from BLCR in consecutive M-SSEP and (b) the detailed functional outcome of those patients with recovered cortical responses.
  
  
  RESULTS
  14/28 (50%) patients with primarily BLCR showed re-occurrence of cortical potentials, either uni- or bilaterally. Of the 14 patients, one died due to a non-neurological cause. Of the remaining 13 patients 6 - most of them suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) - could be transferred to further continuing neurorehabilitation and achieved good functional long-term outcome. BLCR in HIE still had a poor prognosis with none of our patients achieving an outcome better than vegetative state.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Electrophysiological recovery from primarily BLCR seems possible and is accompanied by good functional outcome in a relevant number of patients. Thus caution is warranted in predicting a poor prognosis based predominantly on SSEP, especially in patients with TBI. Focusing SSEP-examination on the early days after severe brain injury and performing only one examination in the case of BLCR may lead to systematic underestimation of the possibility of recovery.
authors.affiliation: SRH Fachkrankenhaus Neresheim, Kösinger Street 11, D-73450 Neresheim, Germany; Asklepios Schlossberg-Klinik, Frankfurter Street 33, D-64732 Bad König, Germany. Electronic address: mschorl@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schorl
authors.affiliation: SRH Fachkrankenhaus Neresheim, Kösinger Street 11, D-73450 Neresheim, Germany.
authors.forename: Seung-Ja
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Valerius-Kukula
authors.affiliation: SRH Fachkrankenhaus Neresheim, Kösinger Street 11, D-73450 Neresheim, Germany.
authors.forename: Thomas P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Kemmer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery; D003128:Coma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D005073:Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020925:Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D020127:Recovery of Function / Q000502:physiology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Brain injury; Evoked potentials; Outcome; Prognosis; Rehabilitation