title: Feeding strategies and manure management for cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms in Wisconsin.
abstract: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from dairy farms are a major concern. Our objectives were to assess the effect of mitigation strategies on GHG emissions and net return to management on 3 distinct farm production systems of Wisconsin. A survey was conducted on 27 conventional farms, 30 grazing farms, and 69 organic farms. The data collected were used to characterize 3 feeding systems scaled to the average farm (85 cows and 127ha). The Integrated Farm System Model was used to simulate the economic and environmental impacts of altering feeding and manure management in those 3 farms. Results showed that incorporation of grazing practices for lactating cows in the conventional farm led to a 27.6% decrease in total GHG emissions [-0.16kg of CO2 equivalents (CO2eq)/kg of energy corrected milk (ECM)] and a 29.3% increase in net return to management (+$7,005/yr) when milk production was assumed constant. For the grazing and organic farms, decreasing the forage-to-concentrate ratio in the diet decreased GHG emissions when milk production was increased by 5 or 10%. The 5% increase in milk production was not sufficient to maintain the net return; however, the 10% increase in milk production increased net return in the organic farm but not on the grazing farm. A 13.7% decrease in GHG emissions (-0.08kg of CO2eq/kg of ECM) was observed on the conventional farm when incorporating manure the day of application and adding a 12-mo covered storage unit. However, those same changes led to a 6.1% (+0.04kg of CO2eq/kg of ECM) and a 6.9% (+0.06kg of CO2eq/kg of ECM) increase in GHG emissions in the grazing and the organic farms, respectively. For the 3 farms, manure management changes led to a decrease in net return to management. Simulation results suggested that the same feeding and manure management mitigation strategies led to different outcomes depending on the farm system, and furthermore, effective mitigation strategies were used to reduce GHG emissions while maintaining profitability within each farm.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dutreuil
authors.affiliation: Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wattiaux
authors.affiliation: Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Hardie
authors.affiliation: Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706. Electronic address: vcabrera@wisc.edu.
authors.forename: V E
authors.initials: VE
authors.lastname: Cabrera
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000032:analysis*; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003612:Dairying / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D007774:Lactation / Q000502:physiology; D008372:Manure / Q000032:analysis*; D008697:Methane / Q000032:analysis; D008892:Milk / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008954:Models, Biological; D009609:Nitrous Oxide / Q000032:analysis; D018505:Waste Management / Q000379:methods*; D014922:Wisconsin
chemical_list: D008372:Manure; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D009609:Nitrous Oxide; D008697:Methane
keywords: Integrated Farm System Model; environmental and economic sustainability; environmental stewardship; feeding system