title: On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: an international qualitative study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The pathogenesis of chronic cough is not well understood and treatment options are limited. In this study we sought to explore the current understanding and management of chronic cough across an international group of specialists.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was an international study of cross sectional qualitative design. In depth interviews were carried out with "Respiratory Specialists" experienced in treating treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), idiopathic chronic cough (ICC) and/or lung cancer patients and with "Disease Experts" in the field of Chronic Cough. Participants in the study were recruited from the USA, UK, Germany, Ireland, Australia and Japan. Interviews with specialists were held at research facilities and with DEs over the telephone. These were preceded by the specialists completing case records of patients recently seen. All interviews were conducted by native speaking trained moderators using a semi-structured interview guide script. This was designed to elicit the definition of chronic cough, explore the unmet needs for each disease state, define therapy goals, identify patient phenotypes and give an overview of the treatment pathway.
  
  
  RESULTS
  76 specialists and 10 experts took part in the study. Over two thirds (70%) of respondents defined chronic cough as "cough lasting more than 8/12 weeks" (range 2 weeks to 2 years). Physicians emphasised three interdependent aspects of clinical assessment: impact on quality of life, type of cough (productive versus non-productive) and the underlying pathology. Specialists emphasised treating the underlying cause rather than the cough, this being most prominent in Japan. Experts as a group focussed on chronic cough independently. Evaluation of the respiratory system, GI tract and upper airway (ENT) for establishing an underlying cause was recommended. Type of cough (productive vs non-productive) and impact on quality of life influenced treatment initiation. 33% of patients with ICC were prescribed anti-tussives. With associated diagnoses of COPD, IPF or lung cancer the emphasis was on treating the underlying condition. Alternatives to pharmacological treatments were frequently considered.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is significant international variation in our understanding and management of chronic cough. Further work is required to bring forth clear guidance and effective medicines for these patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Studies, University of Hull and the Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
authors.forename: Shoaib
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Faruqi
authors.affiliation: Respiratory Discovery Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, UK.
authors.forename: Robert D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Murdoch
authors.affiliation: Global Market Research, Double Helix, London, UK.
authors.forename: Fabrice
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Allum
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Studies, University of Hull and the Hull York Medical School, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.
authors.forename: Alyn H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Morice
keywords: Chronic cough; Definition; Management; Qualitative research