title: Management of Meloidogyne incognita with Chemicals and Cultivars in Cotton in a Semi-Arid Environment.
abstract: Management of Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) in cotton in the United States was substantially affected by the decision to stop production of aldicarb by its principle manufacturer in 2011. The remaining commercially available tools to manage M. incognita included soil fumigation, nematicide seed treatments, postemergence nematicide application, and cultivars partially resistant to M. incognita. Small plot field studies were conducted on a total of nine sites from 2011-2013 to examine the effects of each of these tools alone or in combinations, on early season galling, late-season nematode density in soil, yield, and value ($/ha = lint value minus chemical costs/ha). The use of a partially resistant cultivar resulted in fewer galls/root system at 35 d after planting in eight of nine tests, lower root-knot nematode density late in the growing season for all test sites, higher lint yield in eight of nine sites, and higher value/ha in six of nine sites. Galls per root were reduced by aldicarb in three of nine sites and by 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) in two of eight sites, relative to the nontreated control (no insecticide or nematicide treatment). Soil fumigation reduced M. incognita density late in the season in three of nine sites. Value/ha was not affected by chemical treatment in four of nine sites, but there was a cultivar × chemical interaction in four of nine sites. When value/ha was affected by chemical treatment, the nontreated control had a similar value to the treatment with the highest value/ha in seven of eight cultivar-site combinations. The next "best" value/ha were associated with seed treatment insecticide (STI) + oxamyl and aldicarb (similar value to the highest value/ha in six of eight cultivar-site combinations). The lowest valued treatment was STI + 1,3-D. In a semi-arid region, where rainfall was low during the spring for all three years, cultivars with partial resistance to M. incognita was the most profitable method of managing root-knot nematode in cotton.
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 79403.
authors.forename: T A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Wheeler
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Levelland, TX 79336.
authors.forename: K T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Siders
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Seminole, TX 79360.
authors.forename: M G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Brownfield, TX 79316.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Russell
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Lubbock, TX 79403.
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Woodward
authors.affiliation: Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 79403.
authors.forename: B G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Mullinix
keywords: 1,3-dichloropropene; abamectin; aldicarb; oxamyl; resistance; root-knot nematode