title: Interpreting chronic disorders of consciousness: medical science and family experience.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Chronic disorders of consciousness (CDoC) pose significant problems of understanding for both medical professionals and the relatives and friends of the patient. This paper explores the tensions between the different interpretative resources that are drawn upon by lay people and professionals in their response to CDoC.
  
  
  METHODS
  A philosophical analysis of data from 51 interviews with people who have relatives who are (or have been) in a vegetative or minimally conscious state.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The medical specialist and the lay person tend to draw on two different interpretative frameworks: a medical science framework, which tends to construct the patient in terms of measurable physical parameters, and an interpretative framework that encompasses the uniqueness of the patient and the relative's relationship to them as a social being.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These differences potentially lead to ruptures in communication between medical professionals and relatives such that that an increased self-consciousness of the framing assumptions being made will facilitate communication and enrich understanding of CDoCs.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Applied Ethics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Edgar
authors.forename: Celia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kitzinger
authors.forename: Jenny
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kitzinger
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease; D003128:Coma; D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D018458:Persistent Vegetative State; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D014474:Unconsciousness
keywords: CDoC; communication; interpretative competences; patienthood; philosophy; vegetative states