title: Attitudes toward neuroscience education in psychiatry: a national multi-stakeholder survey.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study is to assess the attitudes of chairs of psychiatry departments, psychiatrists, and psychiatry trainees toward neuroscience education in residency programs and beyond in order to inform future neuroscience education approaches.
  
  
  METHODS
  This multi-stakeholder survey captured data on demographics, self-assessments of neuroscience knowledge, attitudes toward neuroscience education, preferences in learning modalities, and interests in specific neuroscience topics. In 2012, the authors distributed the surveys: by paper to 133 US psychiatry department chairs and electronically through the American Psychiatric Association to 3,563 of its members (1,000 psychiatrists and 2,563 trainees).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response rates for the chair, psychiatrist, and trainee surveys were 53, 9, and 18 %, respectively. A large majority of respondents agreed with the need for more neuroscience education in general and with respect to their own training. Most respondents believed that neuroscience will help destigmatize mental illness and begin producing new treatments or personalized medicines in 5-10 years. Only a small proportion of trainees and psychiatrists, however, reported a strong knowledge base in neuroscience. Respondents also reported broad enthusiasm for transdiagnostic topics in neuroscience (such as emotion regulation and attention/cognition) and description at the level of neural circuits.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study demonstrates the opportunity and enthusiasm for teaching more neuroscience in psychiatry among a broad range of stakeholder groups. A high level of interest was also found for transdiagnostic topics and approaches. We suggest that a transdiagnostic framework may be an effective way to deliver neuroscience education to the psychiatric community and illustrate this through a case example, drawing the similarity between this neuroscience approach and problem-based formulations familiar to clinicians.
authors.affiliation: Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Lawrence K
authors.initials: LK
authors.lastname: Fung
authors.forename: Mayada
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Akil
authors.forename: Alik
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Widge
authors.forename: Laura Weiss
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.forename: Amit
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Etkin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003479:Curriculum / Q000592:standards; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020380:Needs Assessment; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000193:education*; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000193:education*; D012647:Self-Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States