title: Abdominal wall-lifting versus CO2 pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopy: a review and meta-analysis.
abstract: The aim of this study is to compare the operative parameters and outcomes of conventional CO2-pneumoperitoneum (PP) versus gasless abdominal wall-lifting (AWL) for laparoscopic surgery. The literature databases of PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that had compared the CO2-PP approach with that of gasless AWL for laparoscopic surgery and which had been published between 1995 and 2012. Data for the operative parameters (i.e. surgery duration, intraoperative heart rate (HR), perioperative complications, and postoperative duration of hospital stay and time to activity) and outcomes (postoperative shoulder pain, nausea/vomiting (PONV), partial pressure of CO2 in the blood (PaCO2), blood pH, and serum levels of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-6) were extracted from the identified RCTs. RevMan software, version 5.2, was used for data synthesis and statistical analysis. Nineteen RCTs were selected for the meta-analysis, involving a total of 791 patients who had undergone laparoscopic operations with CO2-PP (n = 399) or gasless AWL (n = 392). Sub-group analysis indicated that the patients who underwent gasless AWL had significantly shorter postoperative time to activity (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.23 d, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.37 to -0.09; P = 0.001), lower incidence of PONV (odds ratio (OR) = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.57; P = 0.001) and lower postoperative PaCO2 level (WMD = -3.09 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.66 to -1.53; P = 0.0001), compared to the patients who underwent CO2-PP. However, the CO2-PP method was associated with a significantly shorter surgery duration than the gasless AWL method (WMD = 8.61, 95% CI: 3.19 to 14.03; P = 0.002). There were no significant advantages detected for either approach with respect to the intraoperative HR, the perioperative complication rate, or the postoperative parameters of duration of hospital stay, shoulder pain, blood pH, or serum IL-6 level. We concluded form present study that the gasless AWL method has the features of shorter time, lower postoperative PaCO2, and lower PONV incidence while the CO2-PP method for laparoscopy requires shorter surgical time.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
authors.forename: Hao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ren
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, China.
authors.forename: Yao
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tong
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, China.
authors.forename: Xi-Bing
authors.initials: XB
authors.lastname: Ding
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, First Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
authors.forename: Xin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, China.
authors.forename: Shu-Qing
authors.initials: SQ
authors.lastname: Jin
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200072, China.
authors.forename: Xiao-Yin
authors.initials: XY
authors.lastname: Niu
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, China.
authors.forename: Xiang
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, China.
authors.forename: Quan
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Li
keywords: Meta-analysis; Pneumoperitoneum; abdominal wall-lifting; laparoscopic surgery; randomized controlled trials