title: Morphological assessment of ancestry using cranial macromorphoscopics.
abstract: Ancestry estimation is essential for biological profile estimation in forensic anthropology. Hefner (2009) and Osteoware (Smithsonian Institution, 2011) presented 16 macromorphoscopic traits that can be scored for standardized data collection and can also be used within a statistical framework to estimate ancestry. The primary purpose of this research was to examine the utility of these traits for assessing ancestry. Tests of observer agreement and the range of variation in trait expression were evaluated. A sample of 208 American whites and blacks from the Hamann-Todd Collection were scored, and several classification methods were utilized in accordance with Hefner (2009). Correct classifications for the pooled sex analyses ranged from 73.3% to 86.6% and from 46.7% to 64.3% when the sexes were analyzed independently. Interobserver agreement was variable and was found to be lower than that presented in Hefner (2009). Trait expression was variable in both groups and was generally consistent with Hefner's findings.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University of Manitoba, 432 Fletcher Argue Building, 15 Chancellor Circle, Manitoba, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada.
authors.forename: Alexandra R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Klales
authors.forename: Michael W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Kenyhercz
mesh_terms: D044383:Black People; D002508:Cephalometry; D005260:Female; D018732:Forensic Anthropology / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D015588:Observer Variation; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D044465:White People
keywords: ancestry estimation; biological profile; cranial nonmetrics; forensic anthropology; forensic science; standardization; validation study