title: Primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: analysis of different instrumentation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Intercondylar femoral bone removal during posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) makes many cruciate substituting implant designs less appealing than cruciate retaining implants. Bone stock conservation is considered fundamental in the prevision of future revision surgeries. The purpose of this study was to compare the quantity of intercondylar bone removable during PS housing preparation using three contemporary PS TKA instrumentations.
  
  
  METHODS
  We compared different box cutting jigs which were utilized for the PS housing of three popular PS knee prostheses. The bone removal area from every PS box cutting jig was three-dimensionally measured.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Independently from the implant size, the cutting jig for a specific PS TKA always resected significantly less bone than the others: this difference was statistically significant, especially for small- to medium-sized total knee femoral components.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study does not establish a clinical relevance of removing more or less bone at primary TKA, but suggests that if a PS design is indicated, it is preferable to select a model which possibly resects less distal femoral bone.
authors.forename: Pier Francesco
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Indelli
authors.forename: Massimiliano
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Marcucci
authors.forename: Angelo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Graceffa
authors.forename: Sophie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Charlton
authors.forename: Leonardo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Latella
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D004867:Equipment Design; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans