title: All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks.
abstract: Whether encoding variability facilitates memory is shown to depend on whether item-specific and relational processing are both performed across study blocks, and whether study items are weakly versus strongly related. Variable-processing groups studied a word list once using an item-specific task and once using a relational task. Variable-task groups' two different study tasks recruited the same type of processing each block. Repeated-task groups performed the same study task each block. Recall and recognition were greatest in the variable-processing group, but only with weakly related lists. A variable-processing benefit was also found when task-based processing and list-type processing were complementary (e.g., item-specific processing of a related list) rather than redundant (e.g., relational processing of a related list). That performing both item-specific and relational processing across trials, or within a trial, yields encoding-variability benefits may help reconcile decades of contradictory findings in this area.
authors.affiliation: University of Calgary.
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Huff
authors.affiliation: University of Calgary.
authors.forename: Glen E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Bodner
keywords: encoding variability; false recognition; free recall; item-specific and relational processing; recognition