title: Judging statistical models of individual decision making under risk using in- and out-of-sample criteria.
abstract: Despite the fact that conceptual models of individual decision making under risk are deterministic, attempts to econometrically estimate risk preferences require some assumption about the stochastic nature of choice. Unfortunately, the consequences of making different assumptions are, at present, unclear. In this paper, we compare three popular error specifications (Fechner, contextual utility, and Luce error) for three different preference functionals (expected utility, rank-dependent utility, and a mixture of those two) using in- and out-of-sample selection criteria. We find drastically different inferences about structural risk preferences across the competing functionals and error specifications. Expected utility theory is least affected by the selection of the error specification. A mixture model combining the two conceptual models assuming contextual utility provides the best fit of the data both in- and out-of-sample.
authors.affiliation: Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
authors.forename: Andreas C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Drichoutis
authors.affiliation: Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America.
authors.forename: Jayson L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Lusk
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007753:Laboratories; D015233:Models, Statistical; D012309:Risk-Taking; D013269:Stochastic Processes