title: Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT.
abstract: Most noise reduction methods involve nonlinear processes, and objective evaluation of image quality can be challenging, since image noise cannot be fully characterized on the sole basis of the noise level at computed tomography (CT). Noise spatial correlation (or noise texture) is closely related to the detection and characterization of low-contrast objects and may be quantified by analyzing the noise power spectrum. High-contrast spatial resolution can be measured using the modulation transfer function and section sensitivity profile and is generally unaffected by noise reduction. Detectability of low-contrast lesions can be evaluated subjectively at varying dose levels using phantoms containing low-contrast objects. Clinical applications with inherent high-contrast abnormalities (eg, CT for renal calculi, CT enterography) permit larger dose reductions with denoising techniques. In low-contrast tasks such as detection of metastases in solid organs, dose reduction is substantially more limited by loss of lesion conspicuity due to loss of low-contrast spatial resolution and coarsening of noise texture. Existing noise reduction strategies for dose reduction have a substantial impact on lowering the radiation dose at CT. To preserve the diagnostic benefit of CT examination, thoughtful utilization of these strategies must be based on the inherent lesion-to-background contrast and the anatomy of interest. The authors provide an overview of existing noise reduction strategies for low-dose abdominopelvic CT, including analytic reconstruction, image and projection space denoising, and iterative reconstruction; review qualitative and quantitative tools for evaluating these strategies; and discuss the strengths and limitations of individual noise reduction methods.
authors.affiliation: From the Departments of Radiology (E.C.E., L.Y., A.M., M.M.S., D.J., M.R.B., C.H.M., D.M.H., J.G.F.) and Biomedical Engineering (D.S.L., D.J.B.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (A.K.H., R.G.P.).
authors.forename: Eric C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Ehman
authors.forename: Lifeng
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Armando
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Manduca
authors.forename: Amy K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Hara
authors.forename: Maria M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Shiung
authors.forename: Dayna
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Jondal
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Lake
authors.forename: Robert G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Paden
authors.forename: Daniel J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Blezek
authors.forename: Michael R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Bruesewitz
authors.forename: Cynthia H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: McCollough
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Hough
authors.forename: Joel G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Fletcher
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal / Q000379:methods*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*