title: ILM peeling technique influences the degree of a dissociated optic nerve fibre layer appearance after macular hole surgery.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We sought to assess the effect of two different internal limiting membrane [ILM] peeling techniques carried out during surgery for idiopathic macular holes on the postoperative extent of a dissociated optic nerve fibre layer appearance [DONFL].
  
  
  METHODS
  We collected prospective data of surgical records, videos, and pre- and postoperative imaging of a consecutive series of patients undergoing surgery for idiopathic macular hole with one of two surgeons. One surgeon used a forceps pinch-peel technique to peel the ILM, whereas the other surgeon used a diamond dusted membrane scraper. The extent of any DONFL was measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and blue reflectance imaging at three months postoperatively. A proportion of the ILMs removed were examined with transmission electron microscopy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-seven patients were studied, with 41 in the forceps group and 16 in the scraper group. The groups were well matched, with no significant difference in any preoperative parameters. Some degree of DONFL was observed on the 3-month blue reflectance images in 88 % of the forceps group and 100 % of the scraper group [p = 0.14]. There was a significant difference in the total number of depressions in the nerve fibre layer typical of DONFL on OCT between the two groups [p = 0.001], and general regression analysis showed that the peeling technique used had the only significant association with the degree of DONFL observed. Electron microscopy showed large patches of cellular debris on the retinal side of the peeled ILM in 3 out of 4 cases in the scraper group and 1 out of 12 cases in the forceps group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ILM peeling technique and possibly other surgeon-specific factors appear to influence the extent of DONFL observed after ILM peeling macular hole surgery.
authors.affiliation: Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Queen Alexandra Road, Sunderland, UK, David.steel@ncl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: David H W
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Steel
authors.forename: Christiana
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dinah
authors.forename: Maged
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Habib
authors.forename: Kathryn
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: White
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001485:Basement Membrane / Q000601:surgery* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D058450:Endotamponade; D005260:Female; D005466:Fluorocarbons / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; D008875:Middle Aged; D009412:Nerve Fibers / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D013508:Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures; D009900:Optic Nerve / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012167:Retinal Perforations / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013459:Sulfur Hexafluoride / Q000008:administration & dosage; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology; D014821:Vitrectomy
chemical_list: D005466:Fluorocarbons; C048381:perfluoroethane; D013459:Sulfur Hexafluoride