title: The prevalence of encoded digital trace evidence in the nonfile space of computer media(,) (.).
abstract: Forensically significant digital trace evidence that is frequently present in sectors of digital media not associated with allocated or deleted files. Modern digital forensic tools generally do not decompress such data unless a specific file with a recognized file type is first identified, potentially resulting in missed evidence. Email addresses are encoded differently for different file formats. As a result, trace evidence can be categorized as Plain in File (PF), Encoded in File (EF), Plain Not in File (PNF), or Encoded Not in File (ENF). The tool bulk_extractor finds all of these formats, but other forensic tools do not. A study of 961 storage devices purchased on the secondary market and shows that 474 contained encoded email addresses that were not in files (ENF). Different encoding formats are the result of different application programs that processed different kinds of digital trace evidence. Specific encoding formats explored include BASE64, GZIP, PDF, HIBER, and ZIP.
authors: Department of Computer Science, Naval Postgraduate School, 1186 North Utah Street, Arltington, VA, 22201-4758.
authors: Simson L
authors: SL
authors: Garfinkel
keywords: BASE64; GZIP; Microsoft Xpress; PDF; ZIP; bulk_extractor; digital forensics; encoded nonfile; forensic science; optimistic decompression; real data corpus