title: A public health hazard mitigation planning process.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Rural Public Health, a member of the Training and Education Collaborative System Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Center (TECS-PERLC), has long-standing partnerships with 2 Health Service Regions (Regions) in Texas. TECS-PERLC was contracted by these Regions to address 2 challenges identified in meeting requirements outlined by the Risk-Based Funding Project. First, within Metropolitan Statistical Areas, there is not a formal authoritative structure. Second, preexisting tools and processes did not adequately satisfy requirements to assess public health, medical, and mental health needs and link mitigation strategies to the Public Health Preparedness Capabilities, which provide guidance to prepare for, respond to, and recover from public health incidents.
  
  
  METHODS
  TECS-PERLC, with its partners, developed a framework to interpret and apply results from the Texas Public Health Risk Assessment Tool (TxPHRAT). The 3-phase community engagement-based TxPHRAT Mitigation Planning Process (Mitigation Planning Process) and associated tools facilitated the development of mitigation plans. Tools included (1) profiles interpreting TxPHRAT results and identifying, ranking, and prioritizing hazards and capability gaps; (2) a catalog of intervention strategies and activities linked to hazards and capabilities; and (3) a template to plan, evaluate, and report mitigation planning efforts.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The Mitigation Planning Process provided a framework for Regions to successfully address all funding requirements. TECS-PERLC developed more than 60 profiles, cataloged and linked 195 intervention strategies, and developed a template resulting in 20 submitted mitigation plans.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A public health-focused, community engagement-based mitigation planning process was developed by TECS-PERLC and successfully implemented by the Regions. The outcomes met all requirements and reinforce the effectiveness of academic practice partnerships and importance of community engagement in mitigation planning.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Additional funding has been approved to expand the Mitigation Planning Process to all counties in Texas with local health departments.
authors: Training and Education Collaborative System Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Center (Drs Griffith and Quiram and Mss Carpender and Crouch), Office of Special Programs (Drs Griffith and Quiram), and Department of Health Policy and Management (Drs Griffith and Quiram and Ms Crouch), Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Rural Public Health, College Station.
authors: Jennifer M
authors: JM
authors: Griffith
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Kay Carpender
authors: Jill Artzberger
authors: JA
authors: Crouch
authors: Barbara J
authors: BJ
authors: Quiram
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D004189:Disaster Planning; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D010934:Planning Techniques; D015980:Public Health Practice; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013781:Texas; D014481:United States