title: Bridging the gap between research-supported interventions and everyday social work practice: a new approach.
abstract: This article describes a rationale for a focus on case studies that would provide a database of single-group pre-post mean effect sizes that could be analyzed to identify which service provision characteristics are associated with more desirable outcomes when interventions supported by randomized clinical trials are adapted in everyday practice settings. In addition, meta-analyses are proposed that would provide benchmarks that agency practitioners could compare with their mean effect size to inform their decisions about whether to continue, modify, or replace existing efforts to adopt or adapt a specific research-supported treatment. Social workers should be at the forefront of the recommended studies in light of the profession's emphasis on applied research in real-world settings and the prominence of social work practitioners in such settings.
authors: Allen
authors: A
authors: Rubin
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012947:Social Work / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States