title: Purifying selection in deeply conserved human enhancers is more consistent than in coding sequences.
abstract: Comparison of polymorphism at synonymous and non-synonymous sites in protein-coding DNA can provide evidence for selective constraint. Non-coding DNA that forms part of the regulatory landscape presents more of a challenge since there is not such a clear-cut distinction between sites under stronger and weaker selective constraint. Here, we consider putative regulatory elements termed Conserved Non-coding Elements (CNEs) defined by their high level of sequence identity across all vertebrates. Some mutations in these regions have been implicated in developmental disorders; we analyse CNE polymorphism data to investigate whether such deleterious effects are widespread in humans. Single nucleotide variants from the HapMap and 1000 Genomes Projects were mapped across nearly 2000 CNEs. In the 1000 Genomes data we find a significant excess of rare derived alleles in CNEs relative to coding sequences; this pattern is absent in HapMap data, apparently obscured by ascertainment bias. The distribution of polymorphism within CNEs is not uniform; we could identify two categories of sites by exploiting deep vertebrate alignments: stretches that are non-variant, and those that have at least one substitution. The conserved category has fewer polymorphic sites and a greater excess of rare derived alleles, which can be explained by a large proportion of sites under strong purifying selection within humans--higher than that for non-synonymous sites in most protein coding regions, and comparable to that at the strongly conserved trans-dev genes. Conversely, the more evolutionarily labile CNE sites have an allele frequency distribution not significantly different from non-synonymous sites. Future studies should exploit genome-wide re-sequencing to obtain better coverage in selected non-coding regions, given the likelihood that mutations in evolutionarily conserved enhancer sequences are deleterious. Discovery pipelines should validate non-coding variants to aid in identifying causal and risk-enhancing variants in complex disorders, in contrast to the current focus on exome sequencing.
authors: Systems Biology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, United Kingdom; School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
authors: Dilrini R
authors: DR
authors: De Silva
authors: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Nichols
authors: Systems Biology, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, United Kingdom.
authors: Greg
authors: G
authors: Elgar
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017124:Conserved Sequence; D004474:Ecthyma, Contagious; D004742:Enhancer Elements, Genetic; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005787:Gene Frequency; D015894:Genome, Human; D060148:HapMap Project; D006801:Humans; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D012641:Selection, Genetic