title: Making waste management public (or falling back to sleep).
abstract: Human-produced waste is a major environmental concern, with communities considering various waste management practices, such as increased recycling, landfilling, incineration, and waste-to-energy technologies. This article is concerned with how and why publics assemble around waste management issues. In particular, we explore Noortje Marres and Bruno Latour's theory that publics do not exist prior to issues but rather assemble around objects, and through these assemblages, objects become matters of concern that sometimes become political. The article addresses this theory of making things public through a study of a small city in Ontario, Canada, whose landfill is closed and waste diversion options are saturated, and that faces unsustainable costs in shipping its waste to the United States, China, and other regions. The city's officials are undertaking a cost-benefit assessment to determine the efficacy of siting a new landfill or other waste management facility. We are interested in emphasizing the complexity of making (or not making) landfills public, by exploring an object in action, where members of the public may or may not assemble, waste may or may not be made into an issue, and waste is sufficiently routinized that it is not typically transformed from an object to an issue. We hope to demonstrate Latour's third and fifth senses of politics best account for waste management's trajectory as a persistent yet inconsistent matter of public concern.
authors: Myra J
authors: MJ
authors: Hird
authors: Scott
authors: S
authors: Lougheed
authors: R Kerry
authors: RK
authors: Rowe
authors: Cassandra
authors: C
authors: Kuyvenhoven
mesh_terms: D002947:Cities; D058735:Environmental Policy; D009864:Ontario; D011639:Public Opinion; D017150:Public Sector; D018505:Waste Management / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*