title: Use of the distress thermometer to evaluate symptoms, outcome and satisfaction in a specialist psycho-oncology service.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends the use of structured tools to improve holistic care for patients with cancer. The Distress Thermometer and Problem Checklist (DT) is commonly used for screening in physical health settings. However, it has not been integrated into the clinical pathway within specialist psycho-oncology services. We used the DT to examine the broad clinical effectiveness of psycho-oncology intervention and to ascertain factors from the DT linked to an improved outcome. We also evaluated patients' satisfaction with their care.
  
  
  METHODS
  We asked 111 adult outpatients referred to York Psycho-Oncology Service to complete the DT at their first appointment. Individuals offered a period of psycho-oncology care re-rated their emotional distress, problems and service satisfaction on the DT at discharge.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Median distress scores decreased significantly (from 6 to 4, Wilcoxon's z = -4.83, P < .001) indicating a large clinical effect size (Cohen's d = 1.22). Frequency of emotional problems (anxiety, depression and anger) fell significantly by 15-24% despite no significant change in patients' physical health or practical problems. Number of emotional problems was the best predictor of distress at discharge (beta = 0.468, P = .002). Satisfaction was high and correlated with lower distress scores (r = -0.42, P = .005) and fewer emotional problems (r = -0.31, P = .04) at discharge but not with number of appointments attended. Qualitative thematic analysis showed patients particularly value supportive listening and advice on coping strategies from professionals independent of their physical care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The DT is an acceptable and useful tool for enhancing the delivery of structured psycho-oncology care. It may also provide evidence to support the effectiveness of specialist psycho-oncology interventions.
authors: Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, and Hull York Medical School, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: paul.blenkiron@nhs.net.
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Blenkiron
authors: Cancer Psychology Service, Psychological Medicine, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alexander.brooks@nhs.net.
authors: Alexander
authors: A
authors: Brooks
authors: Cancer Psychology Service, Psychological Medicine, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: R.S.Dearden@2011.hull.ac.uk.
authors: Richard
authors: R
authors: Dearden
authors: Cancer Psychology Service, Psychological Medicine, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire YO31 8HE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Joanne.Mcvey@York.nhs.uk.
authors: Joanne
authors: J
authors: McVey
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002173:Cancer Care Facilities; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology*; D016522:Oncology Service, Hospital; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011584:Psychology; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D064232:Visual Analog Scale
keywords: Cancer; Distress; Oncology; Problems; Satisfaction