title: Biogeographical and taxonomic biases in tropical forest fragmentation research.
abstract: Despite several decades of research on the effects of fragmentation and habitat change on biodiversity, there remain strong biases in the geographical regions and taxonomic species studied. The knowledge gaps resulting from these biases are of particular concern if the forests most threatened with modification are also those for which the effects of such change are most poorly understood. To quantify the nature and magnitude of such biases, we conducted a systematic review of the published literature on forest fragmentation in the tropics for the period 1980-2012. Studies included focused on any type of response of single species, communities, or assemblages of any taxonomic group to tropical forest fragmentation and on fragmentation-related changes to forests. Of the 853 studies we found in the SCOPUS database, 64% were conducted in the Neotropics, 13% in Asia, 10% in the Afrotropics, and 5% in Australasia. Thus, although the Afrotropics is subject to the highest rates of deforestation globally, it was the most disproportionately poorly studied biome. Significant taxonomic biases were identified. Of the taxonomic groups considered, herpetofauna was the least studied in the tropics, particularly in Africa. Research examining patterns of species distribution was by far the most common type (72%), and work focused on ecological processes (28%) was rare in all biomes, but particularly in the Afrotropics and for fauna. We suggest research efforts be directed toward less-studied biogeographic regions, particularly where the threat of forest fragmentation continues to be high. Increased research investment in the Afrotropics will be important to build knowledge of threats and inform responses in a region where almost no efforts to restore its fragmented landscapes have yet begun and forest protection is arguably most tenuous.
authors: Landscape Ecology and Conservation Group, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
authors: Justus P
authors: JP
authors: Deikumah
authors: Clive A
authors: CA
authors: McAlpine
authors: Martine
authors: M
authors: Maron
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D065928:Forests; D014197:Trees; D014329:Tropical Climate
keywords: Afrotropics; Afrotrópicos; biogeographic bias; biomas de bosque tropical; declinación poblacional de fauna; deforestación; deforestation; fauna population decline; sesgo biogeográfico; sesgo taxonómico; taxonomic bias; tropical forest biomes