title: Perceptions of document relevance.
abstract: This article presents a study of how humans perceive and judge the relevance of documents. Humans are adept at making reasonably robust and quick decisions about what information is relevant to them, despite the ever increasing complexity and volume of their surrounding information environment. The literature on document relevance has identified various dimensions of relevance (e.g., topicality, novelty, etc.), however little is understood about how these dimensions may interact. We performed a crowdsourced study of how human subjects judge two relevance dimensions in relation to document snippets retrieved from an internet search engine. The order of the judgment was controlled. For those judgments exhibiting an order effect, a q-test was performed to determine whether the order effects can be explained by a quantum decision model based on incompatible decision perspectives. Some evidence of incompatibility was found which suggests incompatible decision perspectives is appropriate for explaining interacting dimensions of relevance in such instances.
authors: Science and Engineering Faculty, Information Systems School, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Bruza
authors: Science and Engineering Faculty, Information Systems School, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
authors: Vivien
authors: V
authors: Chang
keywords: cognitive modeling; document relevance; information retrieval; quantum cognition; user modeling