title: Drugs for some but not all: inequity within community health worker teams during introduction of integrated community case management.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The Ugandan health system now supports integrated community case management (iCCM) by community health workers (CHWs) to treat young children ill with fever, presumed pneumonia, and diarrhea. During an iCCM pilot intervention study in southwest Uganda, two CHWs were selected from existing village teams of two to seven CHWs, to be trained in iCCM. Therefore, some villages had both 'basic CHWs' who were trained in standard health promotion and 'iCCM CHWs' who were trained in the iCCM intervention. A qualitative study was conducted to investigate how providing training, materials, and support for iCCM to some CHWs and not others in a CHW team impacts team functioning and CHW motivation.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 2012, iCCM was implemented in Kyabugimbi sub-county of Bushenyi District in Uganda. Following seven months of iCCM intervention, focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted alongside other end line tools as part of a post-iCCM intervention study. Study participants were community leaders, caregivers of young children, and the CHWs themselves ('basic' and 'iCCM'). Qualitative content analysis was used to identify prominent themes from the transcribed data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The five main themes observed were: motivation and self-esteem; selection, training, and tools; community perceptions and rumours; social status and equity; and cooperation and team dynamics. 'Basic CHWs' reported feeling hurt and overshadowed by 'iCCM CHWs' and reported reduced self-esteem and motivation. iCCM training and tools were perceived to be a significant advantage, which fueled feelings of segregation. CHW cooperation and team dynamics varied from area to area, although there was an overall discord amongst CHWs regarding inequity in iCCM participation. Despite this discord, reasonable personal and working relationships within teams were retained.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Training and supporting only some CHWs within village teams unexpectedly and negatively impacted CHW motivation for 'basic CHWs', but not necessarily team functioning. A potential consequence might be reduced CHW productivity and increased attrition. CHW programmers should consider minimizing segregation when introducing new program opportunities through providing equal opportunities to participate and receive incentives, while seeking means to improve communication, CHW solidarity, and motivation.
authors: Hannah Faye G
authors: HF
authors: Mercader
authors: Teddy
authors: T
authors: Kyomuhangi
authors: Denise L
authors: DL
authors: Buchner
authors: Jerome
authors: J
authors: Kabakyenga
authors: Jennifer L
authors: JL
authors: Brenner
mesh_terms: D019090:Case Management; D002662:Child Health Services; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003150:Community Health Workers / Q000193:education* / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006293:Health Promotion; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012424:Rural Population; D012649:Self Concept; D014454:Uganda; D000078329:Workforce