title: Effects of combining tactile with visual and spatial cues in conditioned place preference.
abstract: Previous research provides little information about variables that determine which elements of contextual cues gain associative control over behavior in the conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure. These studies examined the effect of external visual-spatial cues on CPP when tactile cues served as the conditioned stimuli. DBA/2J mice were trained in the dark (Experiment 1) or light (Experiment 2) using unbiased procedures in which the spatial location of an ethanol-paired tactile cue during training was relevant (two-compartment procedure) or irrelevant (one-compartment procedure). All groups developed CPP, but it was weakest after one-compartment training in the light. In Experiment 3, tactile cues were tested either in the same locations used during training or reversed after two-compartment training in either the dark or light. CPP was unaffected by cue location reversal in the dark, but it was reduced when cue locations changed in the light. Mice in Experiment 4 also received two-compartment training in either the light or dark, but the spatial locations of the drug- and vehicle-paired cues alternated over trials, making external visual-spatial cues irrelevant. In this case, lighting had no effect on CPP. These studies show that cue location does not affect CPP when tactile cue training occurs in the dark. Moreover, they suggest that external visual-spatial cues might enhance CPP when those cues are relevant, but not when an alternating two-compartment procedure is used. The cue reversal effect suggests that relevant external visual-spatial cues acquire associative strength when combined with tactile cues in a two-compartment procedure in the light. Overall, these studies improve our understanding of how external visual-spatial cues interact with tactile cues during drug-induced conditioning, which could have important implications for studies that use CPP to study the neurobiological bases of drug seeking and drug reward.
authors.affiliation: Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA; Portland Alcohol Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA. Electronic address: cunningh@ohsu.edu.
authors.forename: Christopher L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Cunningham
authors.affiliation: Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA; Portland Alcohol Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
authors.forename: Courtney L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Zerizef
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008811:Mice, Inbred DBA; D010775:Photic Stimulation
keywords: Ethanol; Inbred mice (DBA/2J); Light; Locomotor activity; Reward; Stimulus modality
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:28-37
references.pmid: 23742917
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;85(3):383-5
references.pmid: 3923526
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2006;1(4):1662-70
references.pmid: 17487149
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2006 Sep 18;17(13):1443-7
references.pmid: 16932155
references.citation: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Aug;13(2):167-70
references.pmid: 6106204
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2014 Aug;128(4):430-45
references.pmid: 24841742
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Dec;170(4):409-22
references.pmid: 12955296
references.citation: Genes Brain Behav. 2006 Jul;5(5):389-403
references.pmid: 16879633
references.citation: Addict Biol. 2007 Sep;12(3-4):227-462
references.pmid: 17678505
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;93(2):257-60
references.pmid: 3122259
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Dec;56(6):613-72
references.pmid: 9871940
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;91(3):375-80
references.pmid: 3104962
references.citation: Life Sci. 1985 Jan 28;36(4):363-8
references.pmid: 3965852
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2006 Oct;120(5):1115-32
references.pmid: 17014262
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Nov;201(1):97-106
references.pmid: 18633601
references.citation: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Aug;81(4):786-96
references.pmid: 16009410
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1992;107(2-3):385-93
references.pmid: 1352057
references.citation: Brain Res. 1984 Jan 16;291(1):119-24
references.pmid: 6320951
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(2):195-202
references.pmid: 17216157
references.citation: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Sep;82(1):163-9
references.pmid: 16143377
references.citation: Brain Res. 1982 Jul 8;243(1):91-105
references.pmid: 6288174
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1991;105(1):84-92
references.pmid: 1745716