title: Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy and flow cytometric assessment of the antibacterial mechanism of action of aqueous extract of garlic (Allium sativum) against selected probiotic Bifidobacterium strains.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It is generally reported that garlic (Allium sativum) harms pathogenic but not beneficial bacteria. Although numerous studies supporting the alleged garlic effects on pathogens are available, there are limited studies to prove this claim for beneficial bacteria. We have recently shown that garlic exhibits antibacterial activity against probiotic bifidobacteria. The aim of the current study was to elucidate the mechanism of action of garlic clove extract (GCE) on Bifidobacterium bifidum LMG 11041, B. longum LMG 13197 and B. lactis Bb12 using Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy and flow cytometry.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cultures (1 × 108 CFU ml-1) were individually incubated for 6 h at 37°C in garlic clove extract containing allicin at a corresponding predetermined minimum bactericidal concentration for each strain. For FTIR, an aliquot of each culture was deposited on CaF2 slide and vacuum dried. The slides were immediately viewed using a Bruker Vertex 70 V FT-IR spectrometer equipped with a Hyperion microscope and data analyzed using OPUS software (version 6, Bruker). Spectra were smoothed with a Savitsky-Goly function algorithim, base-line corrected and normalized. Samples for flow cytometry were stained using the Live/Dead BacLight bacterial viability kit L7012. Data compensation and analysis was performed using a BD FACSAria and FlowJo (version 7.6.1).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy showed changes in spectral features of lipids and fatty acids in cell membranes, proteins, polysaccharides and nucleic acids. Spectral data as per principle component analysis (PCA) revealed segregation of control and GCE-treated cells for all the tested bifidobacteria. Flow cytometry not only showed increase in numbers of membrane damaged and possibly lysed cells after GCE treatment, but also displayed diffuse light scatter patterns for GCE treated cells, which is evidence for changes to the size, granularity and molecular content of the cells.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Garlic has multiple target sites in bifidobacteria, penetrating the cell membrane and entering the cytoplasm, where it causes changes to carbohydrates, fatty acids, proteins and nucleic acids. These changes, for example, modification of membrane properties, may prevent exposed bifidobacteria from colonizing the intestinal mucosa. Loss of colonization potential would render them less efficient as probiotics.
authors.forename: Jemma
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Booyens
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, New Agricultural Sciences Building Room 9-10, University of Pretoria, Lunnon road, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. mapitsi.thantsha@up.ac.za.
authors.forename: Mapitsi Silvester
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Thantsha
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000737:chemistry / Q000494:pharmacology*; D001644:Bifidobacterium / Q000187:drug effects*; D005434:Flow Cytometry / Q000379:methods; D005737:Garlic / Q000737:chemistry*; D050296:Microbial Viability / Q000187:drug effects; D010936:Plant Extracts / Q000737:chemistry / Q000494:pharmacology*; D019936:Probiotics; D017550:Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D010936:Plant Extracts
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Jun 15;101(3):341-6
references.pmid: 15925715
references.citation: J Med Food. 2007 Mar;10(1):208-12
references.pmid: 17472490
references.citation: J Food Sci. 2008 Mar;73(2):M54-61
references.pmid: 18298736
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Nov;68(11):5209-16
references.pmid: 12406706
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 May;67(5):2326-35
references.pmid: 11319119
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 1990 Feb 12;261(1):106-8
references.pmid: 1968399
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2011 Jun 1;83(11):4137-46
references.pmid: 21553849
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Aug 15;142(1-2):97-105
references.pmid: 20633942
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Nov;1788(11):2427-35
references.pmid: 19716799
references.citation: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Dec;32(12):1763-8
references.pmid: 2469386
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Nov 15;144(1):202-7
references.pmid: 20952082
references.citation: Food Microbiol. 2011 May;28(3):537-46
references.pmid: 21356462
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Aug;77(15):5257-69
references.pmid: 21642409
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Sep 22;52(19):5769-72
references.pmid: 15366818
references.citation: Res Microbiol. 1999 Mar;150(2):117-27
references.pmid: 10209767
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 2007 Feb 1;361(1):7-14
references.pmid: 17169320
references.citation: Free Radic Biol Med. 2010 Dec 15;49(12):1916-24
references.pmid: 20883774
references.citation: Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2014 Jun;6(2):82-7
references.pmid: 24676721
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jun;68(6):2934-42
references.pmid: 12039752
references.citation: Cryobiology. 2007 Aug;55(1):35-43
references.pmid: 17577587
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2012 Aug 17;158(2):147-54
references.pmid: 22835228
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007 Dec;10(6):596-600
references.pmid: 17981076
references.citation: Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2010 Jan;5(1):91-3
references.pmid: 19929845