title: Cost-effective control of plant disease when epidemiological knowledge is incomplete: modelling Bahia bark scaling of citrus.
abstract: A spatially-explicit, stochastic model is developed for Bahia bark scaling, a threat to citrus production in north-eastern Brazil, and is used to assess epidemiological principles underlying the cost-effectiveness of disease control strategies. The model is fitted via Markov chain Monte Carlo with data augmentation to snapshots of disease spread derived from a previously-reported multi-year experiment. Goodness-of-fit tests strongly supported the fit of the model, even though the detailed etiology of the disease is unknown and was not explicitly included in the model. Key epidemiological parameters including the infection rate, incubation period and scale of dispersal are estimated from the spread data. This allows us to scale-up the experimental results to predict the effect of the level of initial inoculum on disease progression in a typically-sized citrus grove. The efficacies of two cultural control measures are assessed: altering the spacing of host plants, and roguing symptomatic trees. Reducing planting density can slow disease spread significantly if the distance between hosts is sufficiently large. However, low density groves have fewer plants per hectare. The optimum density of productive plants is therefore recovered at an intermediate host spacing. Roguing, even when detection of symptomatic plants is imperfect, can lead to very effective control. However, scouting for disease symptoms incurs a cost. We use the model to balance the cost of scouting against the number of plants lost to disease, and show how to determine a roguing schedule that optimises profit. The trade-offs underlying the two optima we identify-the optimal host spacing and the optimal roguing schedule-are applicable to many pathosystems. Our work demonstrates how a carefully parameterised mathematical model can be used to find these optima. It also illustrates how mathematical models can be used in even this most challenging of situations in which the underlying epidemiology is ill-understood.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Nik J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Cunniffe
authors.affiliation: Embrapa Cassava and Fruits, Cruz das Almas, Brazil.
authors.forename: Francisco F
authors.initials: FF
authors.lastname: Laranjeira
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Franco M
authors.initials: FM
authors.lastname: Neri
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: R Erik
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: DeSimone
authors.affiliation: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Christopher A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Gilligan
mesh_terms: D002957:Citrus; D019295:Computational Biology; D008390:Markov Chains; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D010935:Plant Diseases / Q000191:economics / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
references.citation: Plant Dis. 2008 Mar;92(3):409-414
references.pmid: 30769677
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Sep 14;5(9):e12317
references.pmid: 20856850
references.citation: Am Nat. 2005 Jul;166(1):42-55
references.pmid: 15937788
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2010 Sep 7;266(1):29-40
references.pmid: 20540953
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2013 Oct;103(10):1012-9
references.pmid: 23819548
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2013 Feb;103(2):117-28
references.pmid: 23075167
references.citation: Phytopathology. 1999 Nov;89(11):984-90
references.pmid: 18944652
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2010 Feb 21;262(4):757-63
references.pmid: 19900466
references.citation: Virus Res. 2004 Mar;100(1):115-22
references.pmid: 15036842
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2010 Mar 6;7(44):439-51
references.pmid: 19625305
references.citation: IMA J Math Appl Med Biol. 1998 Jun;15(2):97-116
references.pmid: 9661280
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002174
references.pmid: 21980273
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2009 Dec;99(12):1370-6
references.pmid: 19900003
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 May 08;8(5):e63003
references.pmid: 23667560
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2011 Jun;101(6):725-31
references.pmid: 21561315
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:381-410
references.pmid: 12147765
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2007 Feb;69(2):525-37
references.pmid: 16847718
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 20;104(12):4984-9
references.pmid: 17360397
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2004 Mar;66(2):341-71
references.pmid: 14871569
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Oct 6;6(39):941-50
references.pmid: 19126536
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Jun 7;278(1):32-43
references.pmid: 21382380
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2010 Nov;100(11):1146-61
references.pmid: 20932163
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 24;10(4):e1003587
references.pmid: 24762851
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2010 Jul;100(7):638-44
references.pmid: 20528181
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2008;46:385-418
references.pmid: 18680429
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:499-519
references.pmid: 23725470
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Dec;70(6 Pt 2):066145
references.pmid: 15697472
references.citation: Phytopathology. 2004 Dec;94(12):1390-8
references.pmid: 18943711
references.citation: New Phytol. 2004 Jul;163(1):125-132
references.pmid: 33873783
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2008 Oct 6;5(27):1203-13
references.pmid: 18302995
references.citation: Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1994;32:503-21
references.pmid: 19877849