title: Pelvic autonomic neuromonitoring: present reality, future prospects.
abstract: Currently, the means to assess the autonomic nervous system primarily depend on end organ functional measurement: intravesical pressure, skin resistance, and penile strain gauge tension, for example. None of these measures has been generally accepted in the operating room. Nevertheless, the segmental and peripheral pelvic autonomic nerve supply is placed at risk during both pelvic and lower spine surgery. In this difficult era of suboptimal post-prostatectomy outcomes, the urological literature does reveal the salutary development of safer dissection techniques about the peri-prostatic and cavernous plexus. Means of reliably specific nerve identification remain elusive. The need for actual nerve monitoring (not just identification) has only recently been proposed. Data from the animal lab reinforce an appreciation of the intimate and elegant interconnectedness of autonomic and somatic structures, particularly at the segmental level. Also, the biochemistry of erectile tissue engorgement (in both sexes) is very well understood (the electrophysiology increasingly so). Understanding these principles should permit parallel investigation and implementation of neurophysiological techniques which both identify and monitor pelvic autonomic function. The predicates for these proposed new approaches in the operating room are discussed in this review.
authors.forename: Stanley A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Skinner
mesh_terms: D001341:Autonomic Nervous System / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D010388:Pelvis / Q000294:innervation* / Q000601:surgery*; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000601:surgery