title: A pilot randomised controlled trial of a Telehealth intervention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: challenges of clinician-led data collection.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The increasing prevalence and associated cost of treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unsustainable, and focus is needed on self-management and prevention of hospital admissions. Telehealth monitoring of patients' vital signs allows clinicians to prioritise their workload and enables patients to take more responsibility for their health. This paper reports the results of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Telehealth-supported care within a community-based COPD supported-discharge service.
  
  
  METHODS
  A two-arm pragmatic pilot RCT was conducted comparing the standard service with a Telehealth-supported service and assessed the potential for progressing into a full RCT. The co-primary outcome measures were the proportion of COPD patients readmitted to hospital and changes in patients' self-reported quality of life. The objectives were to assess the suitability of the methodology, produce a sample size calculation for a full RCT, and to give an indication of cost-effectiveness for both pathways.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty three participants were recruited (n = 31 Standard; n = 32 Telehealth); 15 participants were excluded from analysis due to inadequate data completion or withdrawal from the Telehealth arm. Recruitment was slow with significant gaps in data collection, due predominantly to an unanticipated 60% reduction of staff capacity within the clinical team. The sample size calculation was guided by estimates of clinically important effects and COPD readmission rates derived from the literature. Descriptive analyses showed that the standard service group had a lower proportion of patients with hospital readmissions and a greater increase in self-reported quality of life compared to the Telehealth-supported group. Telehealth was cost-effective only if hospital admissions data were excluded.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Slow recruitment rates and service reconfigurations prevented progression to a full RCT. Although there are advantages to conducting an RCT with data collection conducted by a frontline clinical team, in this case, challenges arose when resources within the team were reduced by external events. Gaps in data collection were resolved by recruiting a research nurse. This study reinforces previous findings regarding the difficulty of undertaking evaluation of complex interventions, and provides recommendations for the introduction and evaluation of complex interventions within clinical settings, such as prioritisation of research within the clinical remit.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN68856013, registered Nov 2010.
authors.forename: Claire L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Bentley
authors.affiliation: School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, England. g.a.mountain@sheffield.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Gail A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Mountain
authors.forename: Jill
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Deborah A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Fitzsimmons
authors.forename: Kinga
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lowrie
authors.forename: Stuart G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Parker
authors.forename: Mark S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Hawley
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D018579:Patient Selection; D010865:Pilot Projects; D029424:Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D011788:Quality of Life; D018401:Sample Size; D017216:Telemedicine
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Sep 1;370(9589):765-73
references.pmid: 17765526
references.citation: Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):354-60
references.pmid: 21402304
references.citation: Respir Med. 1991 Sep;85 Suppl B:25-31; discussion 33-7
references.pmid: 1759018
references.citation: J Nurs Manag. 2008 Mar;16(2):173-80
references.pmid: 18269548
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 15;12:403
references.pmid: 23153014
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2009 Nov 12;4:72
references.pmid: 19906317
references.citation: J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(2):71-7
references.pmid: 21097563
references.citation: Prim Care Respir J. 2007 Dec;16(6):363-8
references.pmid: 18038104
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 01;11:24
references.pmid: 21362159
references.citation: Trials. 2011 Jan 07;12:6
references.pmid: 21214895
references.citation: Telemed J E Health. 2008 Dec;14(10):1118-26
references.pmid: 19119835
references.citation: BMJ. 2004 Aug 7;329(7461):315
references.pmid: 15242868
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Nov;62(604):e739-49
references.pmid: 23211177
references.citation: Stat Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;9(1-2):65-71; discussion 71-2
references.pmid: 2345839
references.citation: Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72
references.pmid: 10158943
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 23;4:69
references.pmid: 19852784
references.citation: J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010 Jul;1(2):100-7
references.pmid: 21350618
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Jun 21;344:e3874
references.pmid: 22723612