title: Comparison of stopped Cox regression with direct methods such as pseudo-values and binomial regression.
abstract: By far the most popular model to obtain survival predictions for individual patients is the Cox model. The Cox model does not make any assumptions on the underlying hazard, but it relies heavily on the proportional hazards assumption. The most common ways to circumvent this robustness problem are 1) to categorize patients based on their prognostic risk score and to base predictions on Kaplan-Meier curves for the risk categories, or 2) to include interactions with the covariates and suitable functions of time. Robust estimators of the t(0)-year survival probabilities can also be obtained from a "stopped Cox" regression model, in which all observations are administratively censored at t(0). Other recent approaches to solve this robustness problem, originally proposed in the context of competing risks, are pseudo-values and direct binomial regression, based on unbiased estimating equations. In this paper stopped Cox regression is compared with these direct approaches. This is done by means of a simulation study to assess the biases of the different approaches and an analysis of breast cancer data to get some feeling for the performance in practice. The tentative conclusion is that stopped Cox and direct models agree well if the follow-up is not too long. There are larger differences for long-term follow-up data. There stopped Cox might be more efficient, but less robust.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone S-5-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC , Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Hans C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: van Houwelingen
authors.forename: Hein
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Putter
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D016010:Binomial Distribution; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011336:Probability; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012044:Regression Analysis
references.citation: Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3921-30
references.pmid: 22865706
references.citation: Lifetime Data Anal. 2014 Apr;20(2):303-15
references.pmid: 23430270
references.citation: Lifetime Data Anal. 2009 Jun;15(2):241-55
references.pmid: 19051013
references.citation: Stat Med. 2012 May 20;31(11-12):1074-88
references.pmid: 22081496
references.citation: Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Feb;19(1):71-99
references.pmid: 19654170