title: Evaluation of Faculty: Are medical students and faculty on the same page?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Student evaluation of individual teachers is important in the quality improvement cycle. The aim of this study was to explore medical student and faculty perceptions of teacher evaluation in the light of dwindling participation in online evaluations.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study was conducted at the United Arab Emirates University College of Medicine & Health Sciences between September 2010 and June 2011. A 21-item questionnaire was used to investigate learner and faculty perceptions of teacher evaluation in terms of purpose, etiquette, confidentiality and outcome on a five-point Likert scale.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The questionnaire was completed by 54% of faculty and 23% of students. Faculty and students generally concurred that teachers should be evaluated by students but believed that the purpose of the evaluation should be explained. Despite acknowledging the confidentiality of online evaluation, faculty members were less sure that they would not recognise individual comments. While students perceived that the culture allowed objective evaluation, faculty members were less convinced. Although teachers claimed to take evaluation seriously, with Medical Sciences faculty members in particular indicating that they changed their teaching as a result of feedback, students were unsure whether teachers responded to feedback.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite agreement on the value of evaluation, differences between faculty and student perceptions emerged in terms of confidentiality and whether evaluation led to improved practice. Educating both teachers and learners regarding the purpose of evaluation as a transparent process for quality improvement is imperative.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Pediatrics, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates;
authors.forename: Elhadi
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Aburawi
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
authors.forename: Michelle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: McLean
authors.affiliation: Departments of Medical Education, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates;
authors.forename: Sami
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shaban
keywords: Evaluation Studies; Faculty; Feedback; Medical Students; Undergraduate Medical Education; United Arab Emirates
references.citation: Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010 Feb;95(1):28-32
references.pmid: 20145016
references.citation: Acad Med. 2011 May;86(5):640-3
references.pmid: 21436669
references.citation: Med Teach. 2013;35(1):15-26
references.pmid: 23102151
references.citation: Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):313-9
references.pmid: 12098420
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Feb 15;326(7385):385-7
references.pmid: 12586676
references.citation: Acad Med. 1994 Nov;69(11):861-71
references.pmid: 7945681
references.citation: Med Teach. 2010;32(10):851-6
references.pmid: 20854162
references.citation: Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):264-9
references.pmid: 24362392
references.citation: Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S22-9
references.pmid: 17086041
references.citation: Med Teach. 2010;32(12):953-5
references.pmid: 21090947
references.citation: Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):171-5
references.pmid: 15679684
references.citation: Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):862-70
references.pmid: 11012937
references.citation: Med Educ Online. 2010 Sep 24;15:
references.pmid: 20922033
references.citation: Med Educ. 2000 Jun;34(6):465-7
references.pmid: 10792688