title: What are pregnant women told about models of maternity care in Australia? A retrospective study of women's reports.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe women's reports of the model of care options General Practitioners (GPs) discussed with them at the first pregnancy consultation and women's self-reported role in decision-making about model of care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Women who had recently given birth responded to survey items about the models of care GPs discussed, their role in final decision-making, and socio-demographic, obstetric history, and early pregnancy characteristics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The proportion of women with whom each model of care was discussed varied between 8.2% (for private midwifery care with home birth) and 64.4% (GP shared care). Only 7.7% of women reported that all seven models were discussed. Exclusive discussion about private obstetric care and about all public models was common, and women's health insurance status was the strongest predictor of the presence of discussions about each model. Most women (82.6%) reported active involvement in final decision-making about model of care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although most women report involvement in maternity model of care decisions, they remain largely uninformed about the breadth of available model of care options.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Strategies that facilitate women's access to information on the differentiating features and outcomes for all models of care should be prioritized to better ensure equitable and quality decisions.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: g.stevens@uq.edu.au.
authors.forename: Gabrielle
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Stevens
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, USA.
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Sue
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kruske
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Bernadette
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Watson
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Yvette D
authors.initials: YD
authors.lastname: Miller
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008880:Midwifery; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010358:Patient Participation; D011159:Population Surveillance; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People; D011295:Prenatal Care / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
keywords: Decision support; Information provision; Informed decision-making; Maternity care; Models of care; Patient participation; Primary care