title: Technical considerations in robotic nephrectomy with vena caval tumor thrombectomy.
abstract: Robotic surgery has been applied to increasingly complex urologic procedures since its initial widespread adoption for prostatectomy. While laparoscopic nephrectomy was initially reported over 2 decades ago, renal tumors involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) appeared to be a limitation to the application of laparoscopy. Laparoscopic management had only been reported in a limited fashion for short tumor thrombi not requiring cross-clamping of the IVC. The first robotic nephrectomy for renal cancer with IVC tumor thrombus was performed in 2008 with the first series reported in 2011, including for larger tumor thrombi requiring IVC cross-clamping for thrombus extraction. Since then, several surgeons at various institutions have adopted robotic surgery for these complex procedures. With experience and meticulous surgical technique, the procedure can be reproduced in properly selected cases. Further adoption and reports of multi-institutional experiences are necessary to validate this still relatively new procedure, and such work is already underway.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Ohio Health Dublin Methodist Hospital, Dublin, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: Ronney
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Abaza
keywords: Inferior vena cava; renal cell carcinoma; thrombectomy
references.citation: Urology. 2014 Apr;83(4):818-23
references.pmid: 24529589
references.citation: Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):301-6
references.pmid: 23374787
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1432-6
references.pmid: 23021999
references.citation: J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):465-9
references.pmid: 15247704
references.citation: J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):176-9
references.pmid: 12050516
references.citation: Int Braz J Urol. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):327-31
references.pmid: 20602825
references.citation: Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Mar;24(2):140-7
references.pmid: 24451090
references.citation: Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):1112-4
references.pmid: 17095065
references.citation: J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):864-9
references.pmid: 16469567
references.citation: Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Mar;15(2):75-8
references.pmid: 15725928
references.citation: J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1155-9
references.pmid: 21631304
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2005 Mar;47(3):352-6
references.pmid: 15716200
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):652-6
references.pmid: 20846783
references.citation: J Endourol. 2008 Aug;22(8):1681-5
references.pmid: 18657033
references.citation: J Endourol. 2010 Jun;24(6):1005-12
references.pmid: 20491594
references.citation: Korean J Urol. 2012 Dec;53(12):879-82
references.pmid: 23301135
references.citation: Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):925-9
references.pmid: 15533479