title: Infants' ability to respond to depth from the retinal size of human faces: comparing monocular and binocular preferential-looking.
abstract: To examine sensitivity to pictorial depth cues in young infants (4 and 5 months-of-age), we compared monocular and binocular preferential looking to a display on which two faces were equidistantly presented and one was larger than the other, depicting depth from the size of human faces. Because human faces vary little in size, the correlation between retinal size and distance can provide depth information. As a result, adults perceive a larger face as closer than a smaller one. Although binocular information for depth provided information that the faces in our display were equidistant, under monocular viewing, no such information was provided. Rather, the size of the faces indicated that one was closer than the other. Infants are known to look longer at apparently closer objects. Therefore, we hypothesized that infants would look longer at a larger face in the monocular than in the binocular condition if they perceived depth from the size of human faces. Because the displays were identical in the two conditions, any difference in looking-behavior between monocular and binocular viewing indicated sensitivity to depth information. Results showed that 5-month-old infants preferred the larger, apparently closer, face in the monocular condition compared to the binocular condition when static displays were presented. In addition, when presented with a dynamic display, 4-month-old infants showed a stronger 'closer' preference in the monocular condition compared to the binocular condition. This was not the case when the faces were inverted. These results suggest that even 4-month-old infants respond to depth information from a depth cue that may require learning, the size of faces.
authors.affiliation: Research and Development Initiative, Chuo University, Japan. Electronic address: aki.tsuruhara@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Aki
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tsuruhara
authors.affiliation: Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, United States.
authors.forename: Sherryse
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Corrow
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Japan Women's University, Japan.
authors.forename: So
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kanazawa
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Chuo University, Japan.
authors.forename: Masami K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Yamaguchi
authors.affiliation: Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, United States.
authors.forename: Albert
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Yonas
mesh_terms: D003463:Cues; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012160:Retina / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Depth; Face; Familiar size; Infant; Preferential looking; Relative size
references.citation: Child Dev. 2009 Jul-Aug;80(4):1259-71
references.pmid: 19630907
references.citation: Science. 1980 Jan 18;207(4428):323-4
references.pmid: 7350666
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5572-4
references.pmid: 6933571
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2009 Jun;32(3):245-53
references.pmid: 19328557
references.citation: Infancy. 2004 Sep;6(2):275-297
references.pmid: 33430531
references.citation: Child Dev. 1976 Mar;47(1):304-8
references.pmid: 954500
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Oct 01;10(12):2
references.pmid: 21047734
references.citation: Science. 1972 Dec 8;178(4065):1108-10
references.pmid: 17741984
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1976 Dec;22(3):413-22
references.pmid: 993723
references.citation: Dev Psychobiol. 2014 Jan;56(1):109-16
references.pmid: 23280555
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2008 Sep;31(3):470-80
references.pmid: 18289692
references.citation: Curr Eye Res. 1982-1983;2(3):199-210
references.pmid: 6759054
references.citation: Nature. 1980 Nov 27;288(5789):363-5
references.pmid: 7432532
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Sep;70(3):207-24
references.pmid: 9742180
references.citation: Science. 1978 Apr 7;200(4337):77-9
references.pmid: 635576
references.citation: Cognition. 1991 Aug;40(1-2):1-19
references.pmid: 1786670
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Feb;35(1):109-28
references.pmid: 21893347
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Apr;49(2):314-22
references.pmid: 2332727
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2009 Dec;32(4):468-75
references.pmid: 19801169
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(5):507-13
references.pmid: 6981241
references.citation: Child Dev. 1982 Oct;53(5):1285-90
references.pmid: 7140431
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;18(4):303-7
references.pmid: 17470252