title: I feel what you feel if I like you: the effect of attractiveness on visual remapping of touch.
abstract: Observing touch being applied to another human's face enhances tactile perception for touch being applied to one's own face. This effect, termed the Visual Remapping of Touch (VRT), is maximal the greater the physical or conceptual similarity between observer and observed. An interesting possibility, however, is that even though the basic nature of the VRT is multisensory, a high cognitive level affinity from the observer toward the observed could modulate the VRT even in the face of decreased physical similarity. In the present study we manipulate the level of attractiveness of the avatars that participants observed being touched. By doing so, we either increased (attractive) or decreased (unattractive) the interpersonal judgment value toward the avatar, while always decreasing the physical semblance between the avatar shown and the original image. Results revealed that both for an avatar depicting oneself or a stranger, the VRT is present when touch is applied to an attractive, but not to an unattractive avatar. These findings suggest that basic multisensory effects, such as visuo-tactile interaction, are modulated by higher-level cognitive representations of the self and of others.
authors.forename: Jean-Paul
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Noel
authors.forename: Giulia
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Giovagnoli
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Costa
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Serino
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001828:Body Image; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Perception. 2007;36(8):1244-52
references.pmid: 17972486
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):630-7
references.pmid: 23276110
references.citation: Perception. 2006;35(2):229-46
references.pmid: 16583768
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;34(9):1159-70
references.pmid: 18550861
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4930
references.pmid: 19293933
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 May;19(5):434-8
references.pmid: 18466402
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2010;57(6):412-8
references.pmid: 20178935
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Apr 22;42(2):335-46
references.pmid: 15091347
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):503-13
references.pmid: 20350177
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 2013 Oct;54(5):401-6
references.pmid: 23786165
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):635-53
references.pmid: 16187849
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Dec;24(3):285-90
references.pmid: 4655540
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Sep;20(9):1611-23
references.pmid: 18345991
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):782-95
references.pmid: 19837101
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):289-94
references.pmid: 22406357
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1202-7
references.pmid: 20679523
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):815-6
references.pmid: 17572672
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Sep;8(9):396-403
references.pmid: 15350240
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):61-72
references.pmid: 2213490
references.citation: Brain. 2005 Jul;128(Pt 7):1571-83
references.pmid: 15817510