title: Development and preliminary user testing of the DCIDA (Dynamic computer interactive decision application) for 'nudging' patients towards high quality decisions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patient decision aids (PtDA) are developed to facilitate informed, value-based decisions about health. Research suggests that even when informed with necessary evidence and information, cognitive errors can prevent patients from choosing the option that is most congruent with their own values. We sought to utilize principles of behavioural economics to develop a computer application that presents information from conventional decision aids in a way that reduces these errors, subsequently promoting higher quality decisions.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Dynamic Computer Interactive Decision Application (DCIDA) was developed to target four common errors that can impede quality decision making with PtDAs: unstable values, order effects, overweighting of rare events, and information overload. Healthy volunteers were recruited to an interview to use three PtDAs converted to the DCIDA on a computer equipped with an eye tracker. Participants were first used a conventional PtDA, and then subsequently used the DCIDA version. User testing was assessed based on whether respondents found the software both usable: evaluated using a) eye-tracking, b) the system usability scale, and c) user verbal responses from a 'think aloud' protocol; and useful: evaluated using a) eye-tracking, b) whether preferences for options were changed, and c) and the decisional conflict scale.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 20 participants recruited to the study, 11 were male (55%), the mean age was 35, 18 had at least a high school education (90%), and 8 (40%) had a college or university degree. Eye-tracking results, alongside a mean system usability scale score of 73 (range 68-85), indicated a reasonable degree of usability for the DCIDA. The think aloud study suggested areas for further improvement. The DCIDA also appeared to be useful to participants wherein subjects focused more on the features of the decision that were most important to them (21% increase in time spent focusing on the most important feature). Seven subjects (25%) changed their preferred option when using DCIDA.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preliminary results suggest that DCIDA has potential to improve the quality of patient decision-making. Next steps include larger studies to test individual components of DCIDA and feasibility testing with patients making real decisions.
authors.affiliation: School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. Nick.Bansback@ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bansback
authors.forename: Linda C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Larry
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lynd
authors.forename: Stirling
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bryan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008491:Medical Informatics Applications; D008875:Middle Aged; D010358:Patient Participation; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30
references.pmid: 7898294
references.citation: Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):50S-79S
references.pmid: 23124615
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726
references.pmid: 11301544
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431
references.pmid: 24470076
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):448-55
references.pmid: 18755566
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 1998 Jul-Sep;18(3):295-303
references.pmid: 9679994
references.citation: Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):163-70
references.pmid: 10539541
references.citation: JAMA. 1993 Jul 7;270(1):72-6
references.pmid: 8510300
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62
references.pmid: 7070445
references.citation: Lancet. 2001 Aug 18;358(9281):571-4
references.pmid: 11520546
references.citation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S8
references.pmid: 24625261
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2012 May;15(5):773-82
references.pmid: 22115180
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:156-63
references.pmid: 23219164
references.citation: Health Econ. 2005 Mar;14(3):307-22
references.pmid: 15386664
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2012 Jul-Aug;32(4):527-31
references.pmid: 22706638
references.citation: Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):689-702
references.pmid: 23910715
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61
references.pmid: 10452420
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1305
references.pmid: 17540908
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417
references.pmid: 16908462
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Aug;96(2):197-203
references.pmid: 24961445
references.citation: BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d228
references.pmid: 21266441
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 May 23;344:e3482
references.pmid: 22623635
references.citation: Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V39-44
references.pmid: 12226584
references.citation: Science. 2003 Nov 21;302(5649):1338-9
references.pmid: 14631022
references.citation: J Health Econ. 2002 Jul;21(4):585-99
references.pmid: 12146592
references.citation: Health Econ. 2000 Jan;9(1):47-55
references.pmid: 10694759
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):158-63
references.pmid: 20004545
references.citation: Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
references.pmid: 17835457
references.citation: Cancer. 2008 Dec 15;113(12):3382-90
references.pmid: 19012353
references.citation: Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1:i39-43
references.pmid: 11533437
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2010 May;64(5):563-6
references.pmid: 20395809
references.citation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Aug 20;9:40
references.pmid: 19695086
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Apr;56(7):1531-41
references.pmid: 12614703
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):303-10
references.pmid: 23381523
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):12-23
references.pmid: 19570647
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):961-4
references.pmid: 12399352
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1178-97
references.pmid: 12416921
references.citation: Patient. 2010;3(4):229-248
references.pmid: 21394218
references.citation: Patient Educ Couns. 2013 May;91(2):154-60
references.pmid: 23265430
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Nov 08;345:e6572
references.pmid: 23137819
references.citation: Health Econ. 2006 Nov;15(11):1217-28
references.pmid: 16786550
references.citation: Qual Health Care. 1995 Sep;4(3):207-13
references.pmid: 10153432