title: The role of configurality in the Thatcher illusion: an ERP study.
abstract: The Thatcher illusion (Thompson in Perception, 9, 483-484, 1980) is often explained as resulting from recognising a distortion of configural information when 'Thatcherised' faces are upright but not when inverted. However, recent behavioural studies suggest that there is an absence of perceptual configurality in upright Thatcherised faces (Donnelly et al. in Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 1475-1487, 2012) and both perceptual and decisional sources of configurality in behavioural tasks with Thatcherised stimuli (Mestry, Menneer et al. in Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 456, 2012). To examine sources linked to the behavioural experience of the illusion, we studied inversion and Thatcherisation of faces (comparing across conditions in which no features, the eyes, the mouth, or both features were Thatcherised) on a set of event-related potential (ERP) components. Effects of inversion were found at the N170, P2 and P3b. Effects of eye condition were restricted to the N170 generated in the right hemisphere. Critically, an interaction of orientation and eye Thatcherisation was found for the P3b amplitude. Results from an individual with acquired prosopagnosia who can discriminate Thatcherised from typical faces but cannot categorise them or perceive the illusion (Mestry, Donnelly et al. in Neuropsychologia, 50, 3410-3418, 2012) only differed from typical participants at the P3b component. Findings suggest the P3b links most directly to the experience of the illusion. Overall, the study showed evidence consistent with both perceptual and decisional sources and the need to consider both in relation to configurality.
authors.affiliation: Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK, Natalie.Mestry@soton.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Natalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Mestry
authors.forename: Tamaryn
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Menneer
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Wenger
authors.forename: Nicholas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Benikos
authors.forename: Rosaleen A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: McCarthy
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Donnelly
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D000066499:Facial Recognition / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009903:Optical Illusions / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010469:Perceptual Distortion / Q000502:physiology*; D020238:Prosopagnosia / Q000503:physiopathology; D011601:Psychophysics; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 1;32(1):352-67
references.pmid: 16632381
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):127-52
references.pmid: 10731765
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1986 Apr;93(2):154-79
references.pmid: 3714926
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Oct;74(7):1475-87
references.pmid: 22707354
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1999 Feb 5;10(2):255-9
references.pmid: 10203318
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Dec;50(14):3410-8
references.pmid: 23010063
references.citation: Perception. 1980;9(4):483-4
references.pmid: 6999452
references.citation: Perception. 1983;12(1):88
references.pmid: 6646959
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23340
references.pmid: 21912594
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Jun;48(6):609-21
references.pmid: 6155251
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):544-55
references.pmid: 16099365
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1986 Nov;23(6):695-703
references.pmid: 3823345
references.citation: Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9
references.pmid: 19564050
references.citation: J Vis. 2008 Sep 16;8(12):3.1-18
references.pmid: 18831616
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 15;3:456
references.pmid: 23162505
references.citation: Perception. 1985;14(4):515-6
references.pmid: 3834393
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1993 Jul;25(3):281-316
references.pmid: 8354050
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2003 Nov;40(6):967-78
references.pmid: 14986850
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):645-68
references.pmid: 21639673