title: Unresolved issues in pre-meiotic anther development.
abstract: Compared to the diversity of other floral organs, the steps in anther ontogeny, final cell types, and overall organ shape are remarkably conserved among Angiosperms. Defects in pre-meiotic anthers that alter cellular composition or function typically result in male-sterility. Given the ease of identifying male-sterile mutants, dozens of genes with key roles in early anther development have been identified and cloned in model species, ordered by time of action and spatiotemporal expression, and used to propose explanatory models for critical steps in cell fate specification. Despite rapid progress, fundamental issues in anther development remain unresolved, and it is unclear if insights from one species can be applied to others. Here we construct a comparison of Arabidopsis, rice, and maize immature anthers to pinpoint distinctions in developmental pace. We analyze the mechanisms by which archesporial (pre-meiotic) cells are specified distinct from the soma, discuss what constitutes meiotic preparation, and review what is known about the secondary parietal layer and its terminal periclinal division that generates the tapetal and middle layers. Finally, roles for small RNAs are examined, focusing on the grass-specific phasiRNAs.
authors.affiliation: Syngenta Biotechnology Inc., Research Triangle Park NC, USA.
authors.forename: Timothy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kelliher
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Rachel L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Egger
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Han
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Stanford University Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Virginia
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Walbot
keywords: arabidopsis; cell fate specification; maize; meiosis; phased small RNA; rice; tapetum
references.citation: Plant J. 2014 May;78(3):385-97
references.pmid: 24635777
references.citation: Plant J. 2008 Jul;55(2):266-77
references.pmid: 18397379
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012;77:83-9
references.pmid: 23274454
references.citation: Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):755-67
references.pmid: 2152125
references.citation: Plant J. 2008 Mar;53(5):790-801
references.pmid: 18036205
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Aug;19(8):2583-94
references.pmid: 17675402
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2008 Oct 01;9:451
references.pmid: 18826656
references.citation: Planta. 2003 Mar;216(5):778-88
references.pmid: 12624765
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2011 Feb;23(2):443-58
references.pmid: 21325139
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2005 Nov;17(11):2899-910
references.pmid: 16199616
references.citation: J Genet Genomics. 2011 Sep 20;38(9):379-90
references.pmid: 21930097
references.citation: Plant J. 2012 Aug;71(3):378-89
references.pmid: 22443269
references.citation: J Integr Plant Biol. 2014 Nov;56(11):1042-52
references.pmid: 24735215
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;17:49-55
references.pmid: 24507494
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2012 Feb;24(2):577-88
references.pmid: 22319054
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2010 May;22(5):1452-62
references.pmid: 20511295
references.citation: Plant J. 2009 Sep;59(6):883-94
references.pmid: 19453441
references.citation: Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):1009-20
references.pmid: 8849906
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2000 Aug;87(8):1193-201
references.pmid: 10948005
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2002 Aug 1;16(15):2021-31
references.pmid: 12154130
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:393-434
references.pmid: 15862102
references.citation: Plant J. 2013 Nov;76(4):592-602
references.pmid: 24033746
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013 May;16(2):170-9
references.pmid: 23466255
references.citation: Dev Biol. 2011 Feb 1;350(1):32-49
references.pmid: 21070762
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2002 Oct 15;12(20):1718-27
references.pmid: 12401166
references.citation: Cell. 2005 Apr 22;121(2):207-21
references.pmid: 15851028
references.citation: Cell. 2012 Aug 31;150(5):1002-15
references.pmid: 22921914
references.citation: G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Jun 17;4(6):993-1010
references.pmid: 24939185
references.citation: Genes Dev. 1999 Aug 15;13(16):2108-17
references.pmid: 10465788
references.citation: Genome Res. 2009 Aug;19(8):1429-40
references.pmid: 19584097
references.citation: Development. 2012 Jul;139(14):2594-603
references.pmid: 22696296
references.citation: Cell. 2009 Feb 6;136(3):461-72
references.pmid: 19203581
references.citation: Plant J. 2012 Feb;69(3):462-74
references.pmid: 21973320
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2011 Dec 1;25(23):2540-53
references.pmid: 22156213
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2010 Nov;154(3):1492-504
references.pmid: 20805327
references.citation: Plant J. 2014 Feb;77(4):639-52
references.pmid: 24387628
references.citation: Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):345-8
references.pmid: 22822150
references.citation: Development. 2010 Jul;137(14):2409-16
references.pmid: 20570940
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Apr 17;508(7496):411-5
references.pmid: 24670663
references.citation: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:21-44
references.pmid: 19575669
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2007 Sep;19(9):2705-18
references.pmid: 17905898
references.citation: G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Feb;3(2):231-49
references.pmid: 23390600