title: Functional morbidity following latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction.
abstract: According to the National Institutes of Health, more than 230,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2014 alone. Following mastectomy, several reconstructive options exist for women with breast cancer. The timing and approach for reconstruction must be addressed rapidly. Although abdominal tissue transfer is described as the preferred method, it may not be best suited to all patients. The latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap is a widely available, proven, and reliable modality. The majority of studies support that shoulder functional morbidity is minimal, but this should be more accurately quantified to allow patients to assess the possible impact on their daily lives. A critical appraisal of the available evidence was undertaken to determine the incidence of new functional morbidity involving the ipsilateral arm following LD pedicled flap breast reconstruction. The process for identifying articles included preappraised and secondary literature sources published between 2005 and 2013. Randomized controlled trials, evidence-based practice, clinical guidelines, and systematic reviews were the quality filters applied. This literature review confirmed that LD muscle transfer does lead to measurable reductions in shoulder joint stability, strength, range of motion, and general functionality. However, these deficiencies resolve in the vast majority of women within 6 to 12 months. Ultimately, the consequences of shoulder function morbidity must be considered and discussed with patients prior to making a final decision.
authors.affiliation: UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida.
authors.forename: Susan L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Smith
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Jul;53(1):6-11
references.pmid: 15211190
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jun;115(7):2070-3
references.pmid: 15923857
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Apr;64(4):402-8
references.pmid: 20224337
references.citation: Scand J Surg. 2011;100(3):202-7
references.pmid: 22108750
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Sep;63(9):1505-12
references.pmid: 19819774
references.citation: Ann Plast Surg. 2008 Feb;60(2):134-40
references.pmid: 18216502
references.citation: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Nov;30(6):406-12
references.pmid: 20633032
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Nov;122(5):1334-1340
references.pmid: 18971716
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Apr 15;117(5):1387-94
references.pmid: 16641703
references.citation: ANZ J Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;79(1-2):42-7
references.pmid: 19183378
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1111-1117
references.pmid: 18827644
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):673e-680e
references.pmid: 23629106
references.citation: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 May;66(5):640-6
references.pmid: 23428931