title: The Relationship Between Gambling and Homelessness: A Commentary on Sharman et al. (2014).
abstract: The relationship between problem gambling and homelessness is a little studied area in the gambling studies field. A recent study by Sharman et al. (J Gambl Stud, doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9444-7, 2014) is the first quantitative study in Great Britain on this interesting and important topic. In this context, the study is to be commended and provides an empirical benchmark on which other studies can build. The study reported a problem gambling prevalence rate of 11.6% and is significantly higher than the problem gambling rate of the general population in Great Britain (which is <1%). However, given the political sensitivity surrounding the expansion of bookmakers in the UK, the study needs further contextualization otherwise the findings of such studies may be used by anti-gambling lobby groups to serve their own political agendas. While it is good that such an area has been empirically investigated in Great Britain, this paper briefly (1) places the issue of problem gambling among the homeless into the wider context of problems among the homeless more generally (particularly in relation to mental health problems and other addictive behaviors), (2) highlights some of the methodological problems and weaknesses of the study, and (3) notes a number of factual errors made in the paper.
authors.affiliation: International Gaming Research Unit, Nottingham Trent University, Burton Street, Nottingham, NG1 4BU, UK. mark.griffiths@ntu.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Mark D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Griffiths
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005715:Gambling / Q000453:epidemiology*; D006703:Ill-Housed Persons / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D035862:Vulnerable Populations / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
keywords: Betting shops; Homelessness; Problem gambling; Problem gambling severity index; Vulnerable groups
references.citation: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Jun;10(3):354-61
references.pmid: 17594259
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Apr 26;283(16):2152-7
references.pmid: 10791509
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Apr;54(7):1039-49
references.pmid: 11999501
references.citation: Community Ment Health J. 2000 Dec;36(6):597-601
references.pmid: 11079187
references.citation: JAMA. 2009 Apr 1;301(13):1349-57
references.pmid: 19336710
references.citation: CMAJ. 2002 Sep 3;167(5):477-9
references.pmid: 12240813
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2008 Dec 2;5(12):e225
references.pmid: 19053169
references.citation: J Gambl Stud. 2015 Jun;31(2):525-32
references.pmid: 24452367
references.citation: Arch Kriminol. 2001 Nov-Dec;208(5-6):129-38
references.pmid: 11824093
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Sep;53(9):1112-7
references.pmid: 12221309
references.citation: Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Mar;41(3):306-10
references.pmid: 2312077
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;144(9):1184-8
references.pmid: 3631315
references.citation: Science. 1987 Apr 10;236(4798):157-61
references.pmid: 3563494
references.citation: JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):640-6
references.pmid: 8773638