title: Limited added utility of performing follow-up contrast-enhanced CT in patients undergoing initial non-enhanced CT for evaluation of flank pain in the emergency department.
abstract: In our emergency department (ED), patients with flank pain often undergo non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) to assess for nephroureteral (NU) stone. After immediate image review, decision is made regarding need for subsequent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to help assess for other causes of pain. This study aimed to review the experience of a single institution with this protocol and to assess the utility of CECT. Over a 6 month period, we performed a retrospective analysis on ED patients presenting with flank pain undergoing CT for a clinical diagnosis of nephroureterolithiasis. Patients initially underwent abdominopelvic NECT. The interpreting radiologist immediately decided whether to obtain a CECT to evaluate for another etiology of pain. Medical records, CT reports and images, and 7-day ED return were reviewed. CT diagnoses on NECT and CECT were compared. Additional information from CECT and changes in management as documented in the patient's medical record were noted. Three hundred twenty-two patients underwent NECT for obstructing NU stones during the study period. Renal or ureteral calculi were detected in 143/322 (44.4 %). One hundred fifty-four patients (47.8 %) underwent CECT. CECT added information in 17/322 cases (5.3 %) but only changed management in 6/322 patients (1.9 %). In four of these patients with final diagnosis of renal infarct, splenic infarct, pyelonephritis and early acute appendicitis in a thin patient, there was no abnormality on the NECT (4/322 patients, 1.2 %). In the remaining 2 patients, an abnormality was visible on the NECT. In patients presenting with flank pain with a clinical suspicion of nephroureterolithiasis, CECT may not be indicated. While CECT provided better delineation of an abnormality in 5.3 % of cases, changes in management after CECT occurred only in 2 %. This included 1 % of patients in whom a diagnosis of organ infarct, pyelonephritis or acute appendicitis in a thin patient could only be made on CECT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
authors.forename: Monica D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Agarwal
authors.forename: Robin B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Levenson
authors.forename: Bettina
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Siewert
authors.forename: Marc A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Camacho
authors.forename: Vassilios
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Raptopoulos
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003287:Contrast Media; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D005260:Female; D021501:Flank Pain / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D007669:Kidney Calculi / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D052878:Urolithiasis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2014 Aug;21(4):391-405
references.pmid: 24676736
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jan;166(1):97-101
references.pmid: 8571915
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2004 Jul;10(6):327-33
references.pmid: 15278717
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):699-707
references.pmid: 21762233
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 1997;7(5):680-5
references.pmid: 9166565
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr;188(4):927-33
references.pmid: 17377025
references.citation: Clin Imaging. 2005 Sep-Oct;29(5):331-6
references.pmid: 16153539
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Dec;201(6):1283-90
references.pmid: 24261368
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2005 Nov;46(7):756-63
references.pmid: 16372698
references.citation: Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):119-25
references.pmid: 22570506
references.citation: Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):327-42
references.pmid: 24761954
references.citation: J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):735-40
references.pmid: 9474137
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 May;172(5):1199-206
references.pmid: 10227489
references.citation: Urology. 2000 Jul;56(1):53-7
references.pmid: 10869622
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2008 Jul;15(4):217-25
references.pmid: 18386086
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 Mar;194(3):789-94
references.pmid: 7862980
references.citation: Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;47(1):27-40
references.pmid: 19195532
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jan;178(1):101-3
references.pmid: 11756098
references.citation: Radiographics. 2004 Oct;24 Suppl 1:S11-28; discussion S28-33
references.pmid: 15486235