title: Overcoming cut-off restrictions in multimorbidity prevalence estimates.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Presently, there is no consensus on how to define multimorbidity. In this paper we investigate the connection between prevalence estimates for two or more and three or more chronic conditions to improve comparability of multimorbidity studies with different cut-offs.
  
  
  METHODS
  In a systematic review of the literature published between January, 1990 and December, 2011, we found 52 suitable studies, many providing prevalence estimates for several age groups. A total of 31 studies reported both the prevalence for multimorbidity based on two or more chronic conditions and three or more chronic conditions, which were analysed in this study. Our research question was whether there is a systematic interrelation between these two prevalence estimates, and how this could be used to improve the comparability of studies on the burden of multimorbidity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Actually, we found a tight relationship between the prevalence of two or more and three or more chronic conditions. Moreover, each of these estimates can be predicted from the other. I.e. the cut-offs of two or three for the number of chronic conditions produce essentially the same information on prevalence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study shows a way to enhance and improve the comparability of prevalence estimates from different multimorbidity studies.
authors.affiliation: Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. barbara.holzer@usz.ch.
authors.forename: Barbara M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Holzer
authors.forename: Klarissa
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Siebenhuener
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bopp
authors.forename: Christoph E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Minder
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease; D015897:Comorbidity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015995:Prevalence; D012016:Reference Values; D012107:Research Design
references.citation: Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002 Dec;14(4):387-92
references.pmid: 12534481
references.citation: Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14 Suppl 1:28-32
references.pmid: 18949641
references.citation: Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Sep 08;7:82
references.pmid: 19737412
references.citation: Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Nov 23;3:74
references.pmid: 16305743
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35
references.pmid: 18049195
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):142-51
references.pmid: 22412006
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):788-93
references.pmid: 18427902
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 14;11:101
references.pmid: 21320345
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):223-8
references.pmid: 15928225
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2008 Jul;98(7):1198-200
references.pmid: 18511722
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 11;162(20):2269-76
references.pmid: 12418941
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
references.pmid: 19631508
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2013 Aug;30(4):473-80
references.pmid: 23666805
references.citation: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Mar;66(3):301-11
references.pmid: 21112963
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):e12-21
references.pmid: 21401985
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):172-8
references.pmid: 23045354
references.citation: J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
references.pmid: 3558716
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):134-41
references.pmid: 22412005
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):175-84
references.pmid: 21184214
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1109-17
references.pmid: 21454049