title: Objective volumetric comparison of room air versus carbon dioxide for colonic distention at screening CT colonography.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To objectively compare colonic distention at CT colonography (CTC) achieved with manual room air vs. automated low-pressure carbon dioxide (CO2) using a novel automated volumetric quality assessment tool.
  
  
  METHODS
  Volumetric analysis was retrospectively performed on CTC studies in 300 asymptomatic adults using an automated quality assessment tool (V3D Colon [beta version], Viatronix). Colonic distention was achieved with room air self-administered to tolerance via hand-held pump (mean number of pumps, 39 ± 32) in 150 individuals (mean age, 59 years; 98 men, 51 women) and via continuous low-pressure automated infusion of CO2 in 150 individuals (mean age, 57 years; 89 men, 61 women). CTC studies in supine and prone position were assessed to determine total colonic volume (luminal gas and fluid). The colonic length along the automated centerline was also recorded to enable calculation of length-adjusted colonic volumes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean total colonic volume (±SD) for individuals receiving room air and CO2 distention was 1809 ± 514 and 2223 ± 686 mL, respectively (p < 0.01). The prone position was better distended in 78.7% (118/150) of cases using room air; whereas, the supine was better in 66.0% (99/150) of CO2 cases (p < 0.01). Using a volume threshold of 2000 mL, 49 (32.7%) of room air cases and 92 (61.3%) of CO2 cases were above this cut-off. The mean length-adjusted colonic volume (mL/cm) for the room air and CO2 techniques was 9.9 ± 2.4 and 11.6 ± 2.6 mL/cm (p < 0.01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Using automated volumetry allowed quantitative analyses of colonic volumes and objectively confirmed that continuous low-pressure CO2 provides greater overall colonic distention than the manual room air technique at CTC. The supine position demonstrated better distention with CO2, whereas the prone position was better distended with the room air technique.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA.
authors.forename: James L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Patrick
authors.forename: Joshua R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Bakke
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bannas
authors.forename: David H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Meghan G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Lubner
authors.forename: Perry J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Pickhardt
mesh_terms: D000388:Air; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D023881:Colonography, Computed Tomographic / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007327:Insufflation / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016684:Prone Position; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016683:Supine Position
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2011 Oct;36(5):538-44
references.pmid: 21184064
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):317-21
references.pmid: 16641349
references.citation: Radiology. 2003 Oct;229(1):99-108
references.pmid: 12944595
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):543-54
references.pmid: 11818626
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jan;186(1):96-103
references.pmid: 16357385
references.citation: Gut. 2002 May;50(5):604-7
references.pmid: 11950803
references.citation: Clin Imaging. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):325-8
references.pmid: 17825740
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):698-706
references.pmid: 18287441
references.citation: Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(8):674-8
references.pmid: 19670134
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Aug;189(2):290-8
references.pmid: 17646453
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1491-6
references.pmid: 16714635
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1999 Nov 11;341(20):1496-503
references.pmid: 10559450
references.citation: Radiology. 2001 Jun;219(3):685-92
references.pmid: 11376255
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):313-6
references.pmid: 16641348
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2191-200
references.pmid: 14657426