title: Time course of auditory streaming: do CI users differ from normal-hearing listeners?
abstract: In a complex acoustical environment, the auditory system decides which stimulus components originate from the same source by forming auditory streams, where temporally non-overlapping stimulus portions are considered to originate from one source if their stimulus characteristics are similar. The mechanisms underlying streaming are commonly studied by alternating sequences of A and B signals which are often tones with different frequencies. For similar frequencies, they are grouped into one stream. Otherwise, they are considered to belong to different streams. The present study investigates streaming in cochlear implant (CI) users, where hearing is restored by electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. CI users listened to 30-s long sequences of alternating A and B harmonic complexes at four different fundamental frequency separations, ranging from 2 to 14 semitones. They had to indicate as promptly as possible after sequence onset, if they perceived one stream or two streams and, in addition, any changes of the percept throughout the rest of the sequence. The conventional view is that the initial percept is always that of a single stream which may after some time change to a percept of two streams. This general build-up hypothesis has recently been challenged on the basis of a new analysis of data of normal-hearing listeners. Using the same experimental paradigm and analysis, the present study found that the results of CI users agree with those of the normal-hearing listeners: (i) the probability of the first decision to be a one-stream percept decreased and that of a two-stream percept increased as Δf increased, and (ii) a build-up was only found for 6 semitones. Only the time elapsed before the listeners made their first decision of the percept was prolonged as compared to normal-hearing listeners. The similarity in the data of the CI user and the normal-hearing listeners indicates that the quality of stream formation is similar in these groups of listeners.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Böckmann-Barthel
authors.affiliation: Special Lab Non-invasive Brain Imaging, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Susann
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Deike
authors.affiliation: Special Lab Non-invasive Brain Imaging, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
authors.forename: André
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Brechmann
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ziese
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Jesko L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Verhey
keywords: auditory streaming; build-up; cochlear implant; perception; psychoacoustics
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 06;4:790
references.pmid: 24223563
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Mar;17(3):501-12
references.pmid: 16581981
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Oct;126(4):1975-87
references.pmid: 19813809
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 31;3:461
references.pmid: 23118731
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Oct 6;48(1):139-48
references.pmid: 16202714
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1971 Aug;89(2):244-9
references.pmid: 5567132
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):1088-101
references.pmid: 16396016
references.citation: Hear Res. 2006 Dec;222(1-2):100-7
references.pmid: 17071032
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Aug 5;18(15):1124-8
references.pmid: 18656355
references.citation: Hear Res. 2005 Jun;204(1-2):16-28
references.pmid: 15925188
references.citation: Hear Res. 2007 Mar;225(1-2):11-24
references.pmid: 17257790
references.citation: Hear Res. 2008 Oct;244(1-2):77-84
references.pmid: 18692556
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul;120(1):360-74
references.pmid: 16875232
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):115-27
references.pmid: 11248927
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Aug;4(3):380-7
references.pmid: 681887
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 Dec;33(6):547-55
references.pmid: 4117332
references.citation: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jul;147(1):112-8
references.pmid: 22344289
references.citation: Hear Res. 2014 Feb;308:13-26
references.pmid: 23665130