title: A genealogical map of the concept of habit.
abstract: The notion of information processing has dominated the study of the mind for over six decades. However, before the advent of cognitivism, one of the most prominent theoretical ideas was that of Habit. This is a concept with a rich and complex history, which is again starting to awaken interest, following recent embodied, enactive critiques of computationalist frameworks. We offer here a very brief history of the concept of habit in the form of a genealogical network-map. This serves to provide an overview of the richness of this notion and as a guide for further re-appraisal. We identify 77 thinkers and their influences, and group them into seven schools of thought. Two major trends can be distinguished. One is the associationist trend, starting with the work of Locke and Hume, developed by Hartley, Bain, and Mill to be later absorbed into behaviorism through pioneering animal psychologists (Morgan and Thorndike). This tradition conceived of habits atomistically and as automatisms (a conception later debunked by cognitivism). Another historical trend we have called organicism inherits the legacy of Aristotle and develops along German idealism, French spiritualism, pragmatism, and phenomenology. It feeds into the work of continental psychologists in the early 20th century, influencing important figures such as Merleau-Ponty, Piaget, and Gibson. But it has not yet been taken up by mainstream cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Habits, in this tradition, are seen as ecological, self-organizing structures that relate to a web of predispositions and plastic dependencies both in the agent and in the environment. In addition, they are not conceptualized in opposition to rational, volitional processes, but as transversing a continuum from reflective to embodied intentionality. These are properties that make habit a particularly attractive idea for embodied, enactive perspectives, which can now re-evaluate it in light of dynamical systems theory and complexity research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University School of Social Work, UPV/EHU University of the Basque Country Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain ; Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, UPV/EHU University of the Basque Country Donostia - San Sebastián, Spain.
authors.forename: Xabier E
authors.initials: XE
authors.lastname: Barandiaran
authors.affiliation: Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, UPV/EHU University of the Basque Country Donostia - San Sebastián, Spain ; Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science Bilbao, Spain ; Department of Informatics, Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, University of Sussex Brighton, UK.
authors.forename: Ezequiel A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Di Paolo
keywords: associationism; habit; history of philosophy; history of psychology; organicism
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1178-83
references.pmid: 11127835
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):843-63
references.pmid: 17907866
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jul;2(7):475-83
references.pmid: 11433372
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31:359-87
references.pmid: 18558860
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193-216
references.pmid: 15440996
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1704-11
references.pmid: 16286932
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031
references.pmid: 12239892
references.citation: Science. 2011 Jan 14;331(6014):176-82
references.pmid: 21163965
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Oct;21(5):615-28; discussion 629-65
references.pmid: 10097022
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 May;17(5):202-9
references.pmid: 23608361
references.citation: Biol Res. 1995;28(1):81-95
references.pmid: 8728823
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1036-51
references.pmid: 22487034
references.citation: J Hist Neurosci. 1997 Apr;6(1):21-37
references.pmid: 11619194
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Dec;20(4):537-56; discussion 556-96
references.pmid: 10097006