title: Tests of measurement invariance without subgroups: a generalization of classical methods.
abstract: The issue of measurement invariance commonly arises in factor-analytic contexts, with methods for assessment including likelihood ratio tests, Lagrange multiplier tests, and Wald tests. These tests all require advance definition of the number of groups, group membership, and offending model parameters. In this paper, we study tests of measurement invariance based on stochastic processes of casewise derivatives of the likelihood function. These tests can be viewed as generalizations of the Lagrange multiplier test, and they are especially useful for: (i) identifying subgroups of individuals that violate measurement invariance along a continuous auxiliary variable without prespecified thresholds, and (ii) identifying specific parameters impacted by measurement invariance violations. The tests are presented and illustrated in detail, including an application to a study of stereotype threat and simulations examining the tests' abilities in controlled conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA, merklee@missouri.edu.
authors.forename: Edgar C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Merkle
authors.forename: Achim
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Zeileis
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods*; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Psychometrika. 2011 Apr 1;76(2):306-317
references.pmid: 23258944
references.citation: Exp Aging Res. 1992 Autumn-Winter;18(3-4):117-44
references.pmid: 1459160
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):101-25
references.pmid: 19485624
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):696-716
references.pmid: 16351363
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2004 Mar;9(1):3-29
references.pmid: 15053717
references.citation: Methodology (Gott). 2008;4(1):22-36
references.pmid: 20046801
references.citation: Twin Res. 2002 Dec;5(6):554-71
references.pmid: 12573187
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2009 Dec;14(4):323-48
references.pmid: 19968396
references.citation: Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S176-81
references.pmid: 17060825
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:577-605
references.pmid: 18817479
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2005 Mar;10(1):21-39
references.pmid: 15810867
references.citation: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 Feb;64(Pt 1):161-81
references.pmid: 21506949
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1292-306
references.pmid: 17100485
references.citation: Addict Behav. 2006 Jun;31(6):1010-34
references.pmid: 16723188
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):19-40
references.pmid: 11928888