title: Integrating mobile phones into medical abortion provision: intervention development, use, and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Medical abortion is legal in South Africa but access and acceptability are hampered by the current protocol requiring a follow-up visit to assess abortion completion.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the feasibility and efficacy of information and follow-up provided via mobile phone after medical abortion in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
  
  
  METHODS
  Mobile phones were used in three ways in the study: (1) coaching women through medical abortion using short message service (SMS; text messages); (2) a questionnaire to assess abortion completion via unstructured supplementary service data (USSD, a protocol used by GSM mobile telephones that allows the user to interact with a server via text-based menus) and the South African mobile instant message and social networking application Mxit; and (3) family planning information via SMS, mobisite and Mxit. A needs and context assessment was done to learn about women's experiences undergoing medical abortion and their use of mobile phones. After development, the mobile interventions were piloted. Recruitment was done by field workers at the clinics. In the RCT, women were interviewed at baseline and exit. Computer logs were also analyzed. All study participants received standard of care at the clinics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the RCT, 234 women were randomized to the intervention group. Eight did not receive the intervention due to invalid numbers, mis-registration, system failure, or opt-out, leaving 226 participants receiving the full intervention. Of the 226, 190 returned and were interviewed at their clinic follow-up visit. The SMSs were highly acceptable, with 97.9% (186/190) saying that the SMSs helped them through the medical abortion. In terms of mobile phone privacy, 86.3% (202/234) said that it was not likely or possible that someone would see SMSs on their phone, although at exit, 20% (38/190) indicated that they had worried about phone privacy. Having been given training at baseline and subsequently asked via SMS to complete the self-assessment questionnaire, 90.3% (204/226) attempted it, and of those, 86.3% (176/204) reached an endpoint of the questionnaire. For the family planning information, a preference for SMS was indicated by study clients, although the publicly available Mxit/mobisite was heavily used (813,375 pages were viewed) over the study duration.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  SMS provided a good medium for timed, "push" information that guided and supported women through medical abortion. Women were able to perform a self-assessment questionnaire via mobile phones if provided training and prompted by SMS. Phone privacy needs to be protected in similar settings. This study may contribute to the successful expansion of medical abortion provision aided by mobile phones.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR): PACTR201302000427144; http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201302000427144 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6N0fnZfzm).
authors.affiliation: Cell-Life, Cape Town, South Africa. kmdetolly@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Katherine Marianne
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: de Tolly
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Constant
keywords: SMS; USSD; mHealth; medical abortion; mobisite; telemedicine
references.citation: J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jul;34(3):159-64
references.pmid: 18577314
references.citation: Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):504-10
references.pmid: 21570546
references.citation: Telemed J E Health. 2009 Apr;15(3):231-40
references.pmid: 19382860
references.citation: Reprod Health Matters. 2005 Nov;13(26):35-43
references.pmid: 16291484
references.citation: Contraception. 2010 Feb;81(2):143-9
references.pmid: 20103453
references.citation: Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):67-73
references.pmid: 22225841
references.citation: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Apr-Jun;10(2):319-22
references.pmid: 19537904
references.citation: Telemed J E Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):18-23
references.pmid: 22150712
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 1):264-272
references.pmid: 20093898
references.citation: Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006 Dec;11(4):285-90
references.pmid: 17484194
references.citation: BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):569-75
references.pmid: 17439565
references.citation: J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:82-104
references.pmid: 22548603