title: Mathematical Modeling and Data Analysis of NMR Experiments using Hyperpolarized (13)C Metabolites.
abstract: Rapid-dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) has made significant impact in the characterization and understanding of metabolism that occurs on the sub-minute timescale in several diseases. While significant efforts have been made in developing applications, and in designing rapid-imaging radiofrequency (RF) and magnetic field gradient pulse sequences, very few groups have worked on implementing realistic mathematical/kinetic/relaxation models to fit the emergent data. The critical aspects to consider when modeling DNP experiments depend on both nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and (bio)chemical kinetics. The former constraints are due to the relaxation of the NMR signal and the application of 'read' RF pulses, while the kinetic constraints include the total amount of each molecular species present. We describe the model-design strategy we have used to fit and interpret our DNP results. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a systematic analysis of DNP data.
authors.affiliation: Singapore BioImaging Consortium, A STAR, Helios, Singapore.
authors.forename: Guilhem
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pagès
authors.affiliation: School of Molecular Bioscience, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Philip W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Kuchel
keywords: dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP); kinetic; modeling; nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); relaxation
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1983 Dec 21;105(4):569-89
references.pmid: 6672473
references.citation: Circulation. 2011 Oct 4;124(14):1580-94
references.pmid: 21969318
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 2012 Nov;25(11):1286-94
references.pmid: 22451442
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jun 8;133(22):8673-80
references.pmid: 21539398
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jul;68(1):8-16
references.pmid: 22127962
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):872-80
references.pmid: 20373388
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;70(19):7400-10
references.pmid: 20858719
references.citation: J Magn Reson. 2011 Sep;212(1):40-6
references.pmid: 21742525
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010 Jun 14;12(22):5818-23
references.pmid: 20461252
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10435-9
references.pmid: 12930896
references.citation: Nature. 2008 Jun 12;453(7197):940-3
references.pmid: 18509335
references.citation: J Inorg Biochem. 2012 Oct;115:211-9
references.pmid: 22658754
references.citation: Nat Med. 2007 Nov;13(11):1382-7
references.pmid: 17965722
references.citation: J Magn Reson. 2010 Jan;202(1):85-92
references.pmid: 19884027
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18131-6
references.pmid: 19826085
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2011 Jul 15;286(28):24572-80
references.pmid: 21596745
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Aug;66(2):505-19
references.pmid: 21661043
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10158-63
references.pmid: 12930897
references.citation: J Magn Reson. 2012 Sep;222:68-73
references.pmid: 22820261
references.citation: J Magn Reson. 2012 Apr;217:41-7
references.pmid: 22405760
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 25;103(30):11270-5
references.pmid: 16837573
references.citation: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Jan 9;51(2):525-7
references.pmid: 21998014