title: Assessing vocal performance in complex birdsong: a novel approach.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Vocal performance refers to the ability to produce vocal signals close to physical limits. Such motor skills can be used by conspecifics to assess a signaller's competitive potential. For example it is difficult for birds to produce repeated syllables both rapidly and with a broad frequency bandwidth. Deviation from an upper-bound regression of frequency bandwidth on trill rate has been widely used to assess vocal performance. This approach is, however, only applicable to simple trilled songs, and even then may be affected by differences in syllable complexity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Using skylarks (Alauda arvensis) as a birdsong model with a very complex song structure, we detected another performance trade-off: minimum gap duration between syllables was longer when the frequency ratio between the end of one syllable and the start of the next syllable (inter-syllable frequency shift) was large. This allowed us to apply a novel measure of vocal performance ¿ vocal gap deviation: the deviation from a lower-bound regression of gap duration on inter-syllable frequency shift. We show that skylarks increase vocal performance in an aggressive context suggesting that this trait might serve as a signal for competitive potential.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We suggest using vocal gap deviation in future studies to assess vocal performance in songbird species with complex structure.
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Geberzahn
authors.forename: Thierry
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Aubin
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D008297:Male; D020308:Songbirds / Q000502:physiology*; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D014828:Vocalization, Animal; D015046:Zoology / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:109-29
references.pmid: 15313772
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 4;103(14):5543-8
references.pmid: 16567614
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2009 Apr 23;5(2):163-5
references.pmid: 19087921
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2009 Mar 1;77(3):701-706
references.pmid: 20161558
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e72768
references.pmid: 23967338
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Jan 11;409(6817):185-8
references.pmid: 11196640
references.citation: Am Nat. 2014 Feb;183(2):214-28
references.pmid: 24464196
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2010 Oct;115(1):69-80
references.pmid: 20153887
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009 Dec;64(2):193-204
references.pmid: 19946649
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1479-85
references.pmid: 12137578
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2000 Jun;203(Pt 12):1845-55
references.pmid: 10821742
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2014;68:1-12
references.pmid: 24436508
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59208
references.pmid: 23527137
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 1989 Dec;76(12):584-6
references.pmid: 2622484
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013 Mar 1;67(3):409-419
references.pmid: 23543812
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Aug 7;273(1596):1907-12
references.pmid: 16822751
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2008 Feb;211(Pt 3):317-26
references.pmid: 18203986
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Dec 22;269(1509):2525-31
references.pmid: 12573066
references.citation: Ethology. 2012 Jun;118(6):584-593
references.pmid: 33859448
references.citation: Evolution. 1997 Apr;51(2):537-551
references.pmid: 28565357