title: Explicit polarization: a quantum mechanical framework for developing next generation force fields.
abstract: Conspectus Molecular mechanical force fields have been successfully used to model condensed-phase and biological systems for a half century. By means of careful parametrization, such classical force fields can be used to provide useful interpretations of experimental findings and predictions of certain properties. Yet, there is a need to further improve computational accuracy for the quantitative prediction of biomolecular interactions and to model properties that depend on the wave functions and not just the energy terms. A new strategy called explicit polarization (X-Pol) has been developed to construct the potential energy surface and wave functions for macromolecular and liquid-phase simulations on the basis of quantum mechanics rather than only using quantum mechanical results to fit analytic force fields. In this spirit, this approach is called a quantum mechanical force field (QMFF). X-Pol is a general fragment method for electronic structure calculations based on the partition of a condensed-phase or macromolecular system into subsystems ("fragments") to achieve computational efficiency. Here, intrafragment energy and the mutual electronic polarization of interfragment interactions are treated explicitly using quantum mechanics. X-Pol can be used as a general, multilevel electronic structure model for macromolecular systems, and it can also serve as a new-generation force field. As a quantum chemical model, a variational many-body (VMB) expansion approach is used to systematically improve interfragment interactions, including exchange repulsion, charge delocalization, dispersion, and other correlation energies. As a quantum mechanical force field, these energy terms are approximated by empirical functions in the spirit of conventional molecular mechanics. This Account first reviews the formulation of X-Pol, in the full variationally correct version, in the faster embedded version, and with systematic many-body improvements. We discuss illustrative examples involving water clusters (which show the power of two-body corrections), ethylmethylimidazolium acetate ionic liquids (which reveal that the amount of charge transfer between anion and cation is much smaller than what has been assumed in some classical simulations), and a solvated protein in aqueous solution (which shows that the average charge distribution of carbonyl groups along the polypeptide chain depends strongly on their position in the sequence, whereas they are fixed in most classical force fields). The development of QMFFs also offers an opportunity to extend the accuracy of biochemical simulations to areas where classical force fields are often insufficient, especially in the areas of spectroscopy, reactivity, and enzyme catalysis.
authors.affiliation: Theoretical Chemistry Institute, State Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Jilin University , Changchun, Jilin Province 130028, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Jiali
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.forename: Donald G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Truhlar
authors.forename: Yingjie
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Michael J M
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Mazack
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Löffler
authors.forename: Makenzie R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Provorse
authors.forename: Pavel
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rehak
mesh_terms: D052578:Ionic Liquids / Q000737:chemistry; D008956:Models, Chemical; D056004:Molecular Dynamics Simulation; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry; D011789:Quantum Theory; D055672:Static Electricity; D013696:Temperature; D014867:Water / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D052578:Ionic Liquids; D011506:Proteins; D014867:Water
references.citation: Theor Chem Acc. 2011 May 1;129(1):3-13
references.pmid: 23493545
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Oct 11;7(10):3040-4
references.pmid: 26598146
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 10;102(19):6665-70
references.pmid: 15870211
references.citation: Acc Chem Res. 2014 Sep 16;47(9):2828-36
references.pmid: 24883986
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2004 Oct;25(13):1584-604
references.pmid: 15264253
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2010 Aug 26;114(33):8742-53
references.pmid: 20441228
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Mar 12;9(3):1417-1427
references.pmid: 23814506
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Jun 7;14(21):7821-9
references.pmid: 22552612
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Apr 21;13(15):6760-75
references.pmid: 21369567
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2013 Dec 14;139(22):224102
references.pmid: 24329051
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Nov 9;6(11):3330-42
references.pmid: 26617087
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2002 May 1;124(17):4832-7
references.pmid: 11971733
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2009 Oct 29;113(43):11656-64
references.pmid: 19618944
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2003 Nov 6;107(44):12039-41
references.pmid: 26317889
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2007 Mar 22;111(11):2193-9
references.pmid: 17388268
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Jan;4(1):33-41
references.pmid: 26619977
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2014 May 28;140(20):204501
references.pmid: 24880295
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2008 Jan 21;128(3):034107
references.pmid: 18205488
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2013 Jul 21;139(3):034107
references.pmid: 23883010
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2012 Jun 14;116(23):6781-8
references.pmid: 22428657
references.citation: Acc Chem Res. 2014 Sep 16;47(9):2731-8
references.pmid: 24841937
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2004 Aug 8;121(6):2483-90
references.pmid: 15281845
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1969 Dec 14;46(2):269-79
references.pmid: 5360040
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2014 Mar 11;10(3):1086-1098
references.pmid: 24803856
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2012 Feb 21;136(7):071101
references.pmid: 22360228
references.citation: Theor Chem Acc. 2012 Mar;131(3):1161
references.pmid: 22707915
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2008 Jun 21;128(23):234108
references.pmid: 18570492
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2013 Jan 8;9(1):33-45
references.pmid: 23704835
references.citation: Acc Chem Res. 2014 Sep 16;47(9):2812-20
references.pmid: 24937206
references.citation: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008 Jan 7;10(1):128-35
references.pmid: 18075691
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2010;6(8):2469-2476
references.pmid: 20730021
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Apr 12;7(4):857-867
references.pmid: 23378824
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2008 Nov 13;112(45):14124-31
references.pmid: 18937511
references.citation: Chem Rev. 2012 Jan 11;112(1):632-72
references.pmid: 21866983
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2010 Aug 10;6(8):2402-10
references.pmid: 26613495
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2014 Jan 14;10(1):58-67
references.pmid: 26579891
references.citation: J Comput Chem. 2011 Jul 30;32(10):2127-39
references.pmid: 21541954
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2007 Nov;3(6):1890-1900
references.pmid: 18985172
references.citation: J Phys Chem A. 2007 Apr 12;111(14):2722-32
references.pmid: 17388363
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2011 Mar 28;134(12):124115
references.pmid: 21456653
references.citation: Chemphyschem. 2008 Aug 4;9(11):1548-58
references.pmid: 18613196
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2013 Aug 7;139(5):054503
references.pmid: 23927266
references.citation: J Chem Theory Comput. 2009 Feb 17;5(3):459-467
references.pmid: 20490369