title: Prism adaptation does not alter configural processing of faces.
abstract: Patients with hemispatial neglect ('neglect') following a brain lesion show difficulty responding or orienting to objects and events on the left side of space. Substantial evidence supports the use of a sensorimotor training technique called prism adaptation as a treatment for neglect. Reaching for visual targets viewed through prismatic lenses that induce a rightward shift in the visual image results in a leftward recalibration of reaching movements that is accompanied by a reduction of symptoms in patients with neglect. The understanding of prism adaptation has also been advanced through studies of healthy participants, in whom adaptation to leftward prismatic shifts results in temporary neglect-like performance. Interestingly, prism adaptation can also alter aspects of non-lateralised spatial attention. We previously demonstrated that prism adaptation alters the extent to which neglect patients and healthy participants process local features versus global configurations of visual stimuli. Since deficits in non-lateralised spatial attention are thought to contribute to the severity of neglect symptoms, it is possible that the effect of prism adaptation on these deficits contributes to its efficacy. This study examines the pervasiveness of the effects of prism adaptation on perception by examining the effect of prism adaptation on configural face processing using a composite face task. The composite face task is a persuasive demonstration of the automatic global-level processing of faces: the top and bottom halves of two familiar faces form a seemingly new, unknown face when viewed together. Participants identified the top or bottom halves of composite faces before and after prism adaptation. Sensorimotor adaptation was confirmed by significant pointing aftereffect, however there was no significant change in the extent to which the irrelevant face half interfered with processing. The results support the proposal that the therapeutic effects of prism adaptation are limited to dorsal stream processing.
authors.affiliation: Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
authors.forename: Janet H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Bultitude
authors.affiliation: Wolfson Centre for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK.
authors.forename: Paul E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Downing
authors.affiliation: Wolfson Centre for Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK.
authors.forename: Robert D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Rafal
references.citation: Brain. 2009 Jun;132(Pt 6):1669-77
references.pmid: 19416951
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Apr;8(2):253-72
references.pmid: 6461721
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(3):327-34
references.pmid: 11684165
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2010 Apr 21;21(6):436-41
references.pmid: 20220540
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 05;7:255
references.pmid: 23761754
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(6):759-67
references.pmid: 3100983
references.citation: Cogn Behav Neurol. 2008 Dec;21(4):249-53
references.pmid: 19057176
references.citation: Cortex. 1978 Mar;14(1):129-33
references.pmid: 16295118
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(3):363-70
references.pmid: 3736818
references.citation: Cortex. 2002 Jun;38(3):309-20
references.pmid: 12146658
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Dec;35(12):1527-32
references.pmid: 9460722
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(9):1165-78
references.pmid: 2812299
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(11):1250-4
references.pmid: 11527562
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Apr;104(2):501-9
references.pmid: 17566440
references.citation: J Neurol. 1993 Jan;240(1):37-40
references.pmid: 8423461
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):426-30
references.pmid: 15147498
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1223-34
references.pmid: 15178174
references.citation: Behav Brain Funct. 2011 Aug 16;7:34
references.pmid: 21843368
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2541-52
references.pmid: 21601583
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Jun;107(3):1048-58
references.pmid: 17967445
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(4):493-503
references.pmid: 12559165
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jan;4(1):26-36
references.pmid: 12511859
references.citation: Cortex. 2011 Jun;47(6):734-40
references.pmid: 20691433
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):453-6
references.pmid: 15820653
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2010 Mar 31;21(5):386-9
references.pmid: 20186107
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):793-802
references.pmid: 11054921
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Nov;153(2):220-30
references.pmid: 12955382
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1750-6
references.pmid: 20219496
references.citation: Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):759-70
references.pmid: 22386659
references.citation: Acta Neurol Scand. 2000 Mar;101(3):195-201
references.pmid: 10705943
references.citation: Perception. 1987;16(6):747-59
references.pmid: 3454432
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 15;57(2):513-25
references.pmid: 21554967
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;14(7):308-16
references.pmid: 20444640
references.citation: Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
references.pmid: 11690606
references.citation: Neurocase. 2006 Jun;12(3):127-35
references.pmid: 16801148
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 21;7:44
references.pmid: 23437014
references.citation: Cortex. 2008 Jan;44(1):90-6
references.pmid: 18387535
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
references.pmid: 5146491
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1226-1235
references.pmid: 21333662
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(1):25-39
references.pmid: 12427563
references.citation: Neurology. 2003 Jun 10;60(11):1826-9
references.pmid: 12796541
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1038-42
references.pmid: 16615325
references.citation: Neurology. 2003 Jun 10;60(11):1829-31
references.pmid: 12796542
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2001 Apr 3;11(7):524-8
references.pmid: 11413004
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1979;17(1):33-40
references.pmid: 431807
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct;191(1):109-15
references.pmid: 18663435
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):166-9
references.pmid: 9744273
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2487-93
references.pmid: 16712882
references.citation: Brain. 2001 May;124(Pt 5):941-52
references.pmid: 11335696
references.citation: Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(4-6):409-18
references.pmid: 17119314