title: Cardiovascular risk factors differ between rural and urban Sweden: the 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA cohort.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Rural communities have a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors than urban communities. In Sweden, socioeconomic transition and urbanization have led to decreased populations in rural areas and changing characteristics of the remaining inhabitants. We investigated the risk factors in urban and rural populations in Northern Sweden.
  
  
  METHODS
  The 2009 Northern Sweden MONICA Study invited a random sample of 2,500 people, 25 to 74 years and 69.2% participated. Community size was classified as rural = <1,000 inhabitants, town = 1,000-15,000, or urban/city = >15,000. We adjusted our analysis for age, gender and education.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The rural population was older and the proportion of men was higher than in the urban areas. Having only primary education was more common in rural areas than in urban areas (26.2% vs. 12.3%). Waist and hip circumference, body mass index (BMI), and total cholesterol levels were higher in rural areas than in urban areas, even after adjusting for differences in age and gender. The largest differences between rural and urban dwellers were seen in waist circumference of women (4.8 cm), BMI of women (1.8 units) and cholesterol of men (0.37 mmol/l). Blood pressure was higher in rural areas, but not after adjusting for age and gender.Participants in rural areas were more often treated for hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, hospitalized for myocardial infarction and diagnosed with diabetes. However, after adjusting for age and gender, there were no differences. The odds ratio for being physically active comparing rural areas to urban areas was 0.73 (95% CI 0.53; 1.01). Smoking, snuff use and the prevalence of pathological glucose tolerance did not differ between community sizes. Middle-sized communities often had values in between those found in rural and urban communities, but overall they were more similar to the rural population. Further adjustment for education did not change the results for any variable.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In 2009 the rural population in northern Sweden was older, with less education, higher BMI, more sedentary lifestyle, and had higher cholesterol levels than the urban population. The rural population should be considered targets for focused preventive interventions, but with due consideration of the socioeconomic and cultural context.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lindroth
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lundqvist
authors.forename: Mikael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lilja
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Sunderby Research Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. mats.eliasson@nll.se.
authors.forename: Mats
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Eliasson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001794:Blood Pressure; D015992:Body Mass Index; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000097:blood / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology*; D002784:Cholesterol / Q000097:blood; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000453:epidemiology; D008019:Life Style; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D011157:Population Dynamics; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors; D012424:Rural Population; D012737:Sex Factors; D012907:Smoking; D013548:Sweden / Q000453:epidemiology; D014505:Urban Population; D014507:Urbanization; D055105:Waist Circumference
chemical_list: D002784:Cholesterol
references.citation: Diabet Med. 2013 Sep;30(9):1054-62
references.pmid: 23586854
references.citation: Glob Health Action. 2010 Mar 22;3:
references.pmid: 20339479
references.citation: Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):1973-98
references.pmid: 8403348
references.citation: Lakartidningen. 2012 Sep 5-11;109(36):1552-4
references.pmid: 23016239
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Apr;41(2):484-94
references.pmid: 22266094
references.citation: Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(5):359-66
references.pmid: 14555372
references.citation: Lakartidningen. 2007 Dec 19;104(51-52):3862-6
references.pmid: 18232527
references.citation: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2003;61:9-17
references.pmid: 14660242
references.citation: J Intern Med. 2006 Dec;260(6):551-9
references.pmid: 17116006
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Apr;66(4):372-8
references.pmid: 21282141
references.citation: Lakartidningen. 2006 Oct 4-10;103(40):3006-11
references.pmid: 17115672
references.citation: Glob Health Action. 2010 Oct 27;3:
references.pmid: 21042431
references.citation: Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Jun;34(6):949-59
references.pmid: 20065965
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 2000 Jan-Feb;115(1):52-64
references.pmid: 10968586
references.citation: Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2006 Jun;67:69-77
references.pmid: 16762900
references.citation: Obes Rev. 2013 Jan;14(1):86-94
references.pmid: 23072327
references.citation: Glob Health Action. 2012;5:
references.pmid: 22855645
references.citation: Public Health. 2012 Oct;126(10):813-20
references.pmid: 22922043
references.citation: Ethn Dis. 2011 Summer;21(3):307-13
references.pmid: 21942163
references.citation: J Intern Med. 2011 Feb;269(2):219-31
references.pmid: 21158982
references.citation: Glob Health Action. 2012;5:
references.pmid: 22468143