title: Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.
abstract: This study intended to compare the productive performance of three different layer raising systems; conventional cage (CC), barn (BR) and aviary (AV). The AV is welfare bestowed housing that allows free locomotion for birds within the BR. The BR allows bird's free locomotion inside BR but without multilevel structures. Both pullets and cockerels were housed together in both AV and BR, but only pullets in CC. Seventeen weeks old Lohmann Brown Lite (n = 800) pullets were housed in AV during this study. The same age layer pullets were simultaneously assigned to either at CC or BR to compare egg production performance with AV. The duration of experiment was 40 weeks (from 21st to 60th week). There were no remarkable differences in egg production, hen day egg production (HDEP) and average egg weight among three rearing systems. First 20 weeks (phase-1) average HDEP (%) of AV, CC, and BR were 85.9, 88.8, 87.1 and average egg weights (g) were 57.5, 59.9, and 56.9 respectively. Those of the remaining 20 weeks (phase-2) were 87.1, 87.9, 85.5 and 64.2, 63.0 62.1, respectively. Daily feed intakes (122 g, 110 g, 125 g); feed conversion ratio (2.4, 2.1, 2.5) and daily egg mass (53.9 g, 54.4 g, 52.8 g) data from AV, CC, and BR were not influenced significantly by the respective raising systems. Daily feed intake of layers in both AV (124 g) and BR (127 g) tended to be higher than that in CC (113 g) during phase-2. Overall, exterior egg quality (dirty and cracked eggs) in both phases was superior in BR compared with AV and CC, whereas CC generated intermediate results. This study indicated that the HDEP per se in AV and BR were not significantly different from that in CC. The study implied that the facility depreciation cost for AV and cost for increased feed intake in AV compared to CC are believed to be critical to evaluate the cost effectiveness of egg production in AV.
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ahammed
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: B J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Chae
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lohakare
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Keohavong
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: J Y
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: National Institute of Animal Science, Suwon, Korea .
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Ohh
keywords: Aviary System; Chicken Welfare; Egg Traits; Poultry Housing; Productive Performance
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2005 Apr;46(2):149-55
references.pmid: 15957434
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2005 Oct;46(5):553-9
references.pmid: 16359107
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2009 Feb;88(2):256-64
references.pmid: 19151338
references.citation: Poult Sci. 1996 Jan;75(1):47-51
references.pmid: 8650110
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2004 Dec;45(6):745-52
references.pmid: 15697013
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Mar 22;54(6):2267-73
references.pmid: 16536606
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;47(1):30-5
references.pmid: 16546794
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2009 Apr;88(4):698-707
references.pmid: 19276411
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;47(1):1-12
references.pmid: 16546790
references.citation: Br Vet J. 1992 Nov-Dec;148(6):475-7
references.pmid: 1467917
references.citation: Br Poult Sci. 1999 May;40(2):227-32
references.pmid: 10465390
references.citation: Acta Vet Scand. 2009 Jan 15;51:3
references.pmid: 19146656
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2153-61
references.pmid: 21933995