title: Development of a forensic identity SNP panel for Indonesia.
abstract: Genetic markers included in forensic identity panels must exhibit Hardy-Weinberg and linkage equilibrium (HWE and LE). "Universal" panels designed for global use can fail these tests in regional jurisdictions exhibiting high levels of genetic differentiation such as the Indonesian archipelago. This is especially the case where a single DNA database is required for allele frequency estimates to calculate random match probabilities (RMPs) and associated likelihood ratios (LRs). A panel of 65 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and a reduced set of 52 SNPs have been selected from 15 Indonesian subpopulations in the HUGO Pan Asian SNP database using a SNP selection strategy that could be applied to any panel of forensic identity markers. The strategy consists of four screening steps: (1) application of a G test for HWE; (2) ranking for high heterozygosity; (3) selection for LE; and (4) selection for low inbreeding depression. SNPs in our Indonesian panel perform well in comparison to some other universal SNP and short tandem repeat (STR) panels as measured by Fisher's exact test for HWE and LE and Wright's F statistics.
authors.affiliation: Forensic DNA Laboratory, Police Medicine Centre, Indonesian National Police, Jakarta, Indonesia.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Augustinus
authors.forename: Michelle E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Gahan
authors.forename: Dennis
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: McNevin
mesh_terms: D016172:DNA Fingerprinting; D030561:Databases, Nucleic Acid; D005787:Gene Frequency; D005819:Genetic Markers; D005828:Genetics, Population; D006579:Heterozygote; D006720:Homozygote; D006801:Humans; D007214:Indonesia; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
chemical_list: D005819:Genetic Markers
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21451
references.pmid: 21731755
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Oct 28;467(7319):1061-73
references.pmid: 20981092
references.citation: Science. 2002 Apr 12;296(5566):261-2
references.pmid: 11954565
references.citation: J Forensic Sci. 2012 Jul;57(4):1031-5
references.pmid: 22390235
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1589-96
references.pmid: 20106848
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Jul;6(4):477-86
references.pmid: 22153980
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 20;109(12):4574-9
references.pmid: 22396590
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;22(2):170-85
references.pmid: 11788962
references.citation: Int J Legal Med. 2001;114(4-5):204-10
references.pmid: 11355396
references.citation: Science. 2009 Dec 11;326(5959):1541-5
references.pmid: 20007900
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Jun;1(2):186-90
references.pmid: 19083753
references.citation: Electrophoresis. 2006 May;27(9):1713-24
references.pmid: 16586411
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Sep 2;467(7311):52-8
references.pmid: 20811451
references.citation: Hum Genet. 2010 Mar;127(3):315-24
references.pmid: 19937056
references.citation: Ann Hum Genet. 1977 Oct;41(2):225-33
references.pmid: 596830
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320
references.pmid: 16255080
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Aug;27(8):1833-44
references.pmid: 20207712
references.citation: Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361-72
references.pmid: 1637966
references.citation: Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Dec 17;138(1-3):134-7
references.pmid: 14642733