title: Customized epithelial debridement for thin ectatic corneas undergoing corneal cross-linking: epithelial island cross-linking technique.
abstract: Thin corneas with a minimum corneal thickness less than 400 μm after epithelial removal represent a contraindication to standard epithelium-off cross-linking (CXL) treatment due to a significant endothelial cell density decrease and potentiality of permanent haze development. Preoperative swelling of the cornea with hypoosmolar riboflavin solutions broadens the spectrum of CXL indications to thin corneas. However the iatrogenic swelling effect might not be durable throughout the CXL procedure increasing the risk of postoperative complications. The transepithelial CXL technique proposed for thin corneas demonstrated poor clinical results and mid- to long-term keratoconus instability. The epithelial island CXL technique with customized pachymetry-guided epithelial debridement was evaluated by means of in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy, corneal topography, and clinical examination in a 1-year follow-up, in order to assess if it may be considered an alternative surgical option for keratoconic patients with thin corneas undergoing corneal collagen CXL. According to our clinical and in-vivo micro-morphological results the technique results safe, and efficacious in stabilizing progressive keratoconus and may be considered a valid option in the treatment of thin ectatic corneas alone or in combination with hypoosmolar or dextran-free riboflavin solutions.
authors.affiliation: Unità Operativa Complessa di Oculistica, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
authors.forename: Cosimo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Mazzotta
authors.affiliation: Unità Operativa Complessa di Oculistica, San Severino Marche Hospital, San Severino Marche, Italy.
authors.forename: Vincenzo
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Ramovecchi
keywords: cross-linking; epithelial island; keratoconus; surgical technique; thin corneas
references.citation: J Refract Surg. 2010 Dec;26(12):942-8
references.pmid: 20166621
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Feb 19;54(2):1418-25
references.pmid: 23361513
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2009 Dec;116(12):2336-9
references.pmid: 19850346
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;95(6):876-80
references.pmid: 21357598
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;38(6):1000-5
references.pmid: 22624899
references.citation: Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22 Suppl 7:S81-8
references.pmid: 22344471
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):621-4
references.pmid: 19304080
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1156-62
references.pmid: 24582997
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;152(1):28-32.e1
references.pmid: 21529763
references.citation: Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;153(1):24-8
references.pmid: 21861976
references.citation: BMC Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug 28;9:10
references.pmid: 19715585
references.citation: Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:848363
references.pmid: 23984411
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1179-83
references.pmid: 23796621
references.citation: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1157-63
references.pmid: 23790530
references.citation: Cornea. 2012 May;31(5):486-90
references.pmid: 22314818