title: Evolution of positive and negative density-dependent dispersal.
abstract: Understanding the evolution of density-dependent dispersal strategies has been a major challenge for evolutionary ecologists. Some existing models suggest that selection should favour positive and others negative density-dependence in dispersal. Here, we develop a general model that shows how and why selection may shift from positive to negative density-dependence in response to key ecological factors, in particular the temporal stability of the environment. We find that in temporally stable environments, particularly with low dispersal costs and large group sizes, habitat heterogeneity selects for negative density-dependent dispersal, whereas in temporally variable environments, particularly with high dispersal costs and small group sizes, habitat heterogeneity selects for positive density-dependent dispersal. This shift reflects the changing balance between the greater competition for breeding opportunities in more productive patches, versus the greater long-term value of offspring that establish themselves there, the latter being very sensitive to the temporal stability of the environment. In general, dispersal of individuals out of low-density patches is much more sensitive to habitat heterogeneity than is dispersal out of high-density patches.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK ammr3@cam.ac.uk.
authors.forename: António M M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Rodrigues
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
authors.forename: Rufus A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Johnstone
mesh_terms: D063147:Animal Distribution; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D008954:Models, Biological; D011156:Population Density; D012100:Reproduction, Asexual
keywords: conditional dispersal; local competition; phenotypic plasticity; spatial and temporal heterogeneity; unconditional dispersal
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1996 May 7;180(1):27-37
references.pmid: 8763356
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2010 Jul;23(7):1374-85
references.pmid: 20492084
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1529-35
references.pmid: 16777748
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Mar 7;268(1466):499-508
references.pmid: 11296862
references.citation: Am Nat. 2013 May;181(5):609-22
references.pmid: 23594545
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 22;269(1491):637-45
references.pmid: 11916481
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2011 Jun;79(4):139-54
references.pmid: 21426910
references.citation: Evolution. 2012 Jul;66(7):2065-79
references.pmid: 22759285
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1980 Jan 21;82(2):205-30
references.pmid: 7374178
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1999 Aug 7;199(3):275-90
references.pmid: 10433892
references.citation: Evolution. 2011 Feb;65(2):490-500
references.pmid: 20874811
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 May 18;5(5):e10694
references.pmid: 20502694
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Sep;62(2):169-80
references.pmid: 12167355
references.citation: Oecologia. 1981 May;49(1):123-126
references.pmid: 28309460
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2003 Nov 06;3:22
references.pmid: 14604443
references.citation: Oecologia. 1983 Mar;57(1-2):166-169
references.pmid: 28310171