title: Virtual patients as activities: exploring the research implications of an activity theoretical stance.
abstract: Virtual patients are computer-based simulators of patient encounters for the purposes of instruction, practice, and assessment. Although virtual patients have been around for some time they have yet to become part of mainstream medical education. A major reason for this would seem to be a lack of clarity as to what educational value virtual patients actually have. This paper argues that virtual patients should be seen as activities rather than artifacts and that activity theory can be used to generate different ways to frame scholarship in and around virtual patients. Drawing on the work of Leont'ev and Engeström this paper describes a range of perspectives based on the operations, actions, and objectives in and around virtual patients; the use of virtual patients to mediate activities; and the sociocultural context and the participants in virtual patient activities. This approach allows us to move beyond the 'does or does not work' discourse of much of the existing scholarship around virtual patients and, to an extent, around educational technologies as a whole. Activity perspectives, and activity theory in particular, offer new horizons for research and evaluation that address many of the limitations of intervention-based paradigms of inquiry.
authors.affiliation: Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. rachel.ellaway@nosm.ca.
authors.forename: Rachel H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Ellaway
references.citation: Harless WG, Drennon GG, Marxer JJ, Root JA, Miller GE. CASE: a computer-aided simulation of the clinical encounter. J Med Educ. 1971;46:443–8.
references.pmid: 5553433
references.citation: van Meer E. PLATO: from computer-based education to corporate social responsibility. Iterations—an interdisciplinary journal of software. Minneapolis: The Charles Babbage Institute for the History of Information Technology; 2003.
references.citation: Ellaway RH, Poulton T, Smothers T, Greene P. Virtual patients come of age. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):683–4.
references.pmid: 19811203
references.citation: Kononowicz AA, Hege I. Virtual patients as a practical realisation of the e-learning idea in medicine. In: Soomro S, editor. E-learning experiences and future. Rijeka: InTech; 2010. http://www.intechopen.com/books/e-learning-experiences-and-future/virtual-patients-as-a-practical-realisation-of-the-e-learning-idea-in-medicine . Accessed 17 Dec 2013.
references.citation: Huwendiek S, de Leng B, Zary N, Ruiz J, Ellaway R. Towards a typology of virtual patients. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):743–8.
references.pmid: 19811212
references.citation: Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, et al. Design principles for virtual patients: a focus group study among students. Med Educ. 2009;43(6):580–8.
references.pmid: 19493183
references.citation: Posel N, Fleiszer D, Shore BM. 12 tips: guidelines for authoring virtual patient cases. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):701–8.
references.pmid: 19513927
references.citation: Poulton T, Conradi E, Kavia S, Round J. The replacement of ‘paper’ cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning (PBL). Med Teach. 2009;31(8):752–8.
references.pmid: 19811214
references.citation: Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, et al. Integration strategies for using virtual patients in clinical clerkships. Acad Med. 2009;84(7):942–9.
references.pmid: 19550193
references.citation: Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):303–11.
references.pmid: 19335571
references.citation: Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990.
references.citation: Leont’ev A. Activity and consciousness. In: Philosophy in the USSR, problems of dialectical materialism. Moscow: Progress Publishers; 1977. pp. 180–202. http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1977/leon1977.htm . Accessed 31 Dec 2013.
references.citation: Ellaway R, Davies D. Design for learning: deconstructing virtual patient activities. Med Teach. 2011;33(4):303–10.
references.pmid: 21456988
references.citation: Engeström Y. Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit; 1987.
references.citation: Engeström Y. From teams to knots: activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
references.citation: Ellaway R, Pusic M, Yavner S, Kalet A. Context matters: emergent variability in an effectiveness trial of online teaching modules. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):386–96.
references.pmid: 24606622
references.citation: Mayer RE. Multimedia learning. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 222–4.
references.citation: Issenberg S, McGaghie W. Assessing knowledge and skills in the health professions: a continuum of simulation fidelity. In: Tekian A, McGuire C, McGaghie W, editors. Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence: from paper and pencil to virtual reality. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago; 1999. p. 125–46.
references.citation: Colvin Clark R. Scenario-based learning: evidence-based guidelines for online workforce e-learning. San Francisco: Wiley; 2013.
references.citation: Huwendiek S, Duncker C, Reichert F, et al. Learner preferences regarding integrating, sequencing and aligning virtual patients with other activities in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a focus group study. Med Teach. 2013;35(11):920–9.
references.pmid: 24003850
references.citation: Clauser BE, Margolis MJ, Swanson DB. An examination of the contribution of computer based case simulations to the USMLE step 3 examination. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):S80–2.
references.pmid: 12377713
references.citation: Ellaway R, Kneebone R, Lachapelle K, Topps D. Practica continua: connecting and combining simulation modalities for integrated teaching, learning and assessment. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):725–31.
references.pmid: 19811209
references.citation: Ellaway R. Activity designs for professional learning. In: Beetham H, Sharpe R, editors. Design for learning: rethinking pedagogy for the digital age. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 188–203.
references.citation: Ellaway R. Educational methods, educational systems. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):428–30.
references.pmid: 22515307
references.citation: Schunk DH. Learning theories: an educational perspective. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Merrill; 2000.
references.citation: Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):792–806.
references.pmid: 21752076
references.citation: Dormans J: Beyond iconic simulation. In: IADIS gaming conference. 2008. http://www.jorisdormans.nl/article.php?ref=beyondiconicsimulation . Accessed 22 July 2014.
references.citation: Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
references.citation: Douglass MA, Casale JP, Skirvin JA, DiVall MV. A virtual patient software program to improve pharmacy student learning in a comprehensive disease management course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(8):172.
references.pmid: 24159213
references.citation: Bediang G, Franck C, Raetzo MA, et al. Developing clinical skills using a virtual patient simulator in a resource-limited setting. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:102–6.
references.pmid: 23920524
references.citation: Harris JM, Sun H. A randomized trial of two e-learning strategies for teaching substance abuse management skills to physicians. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1357–62.
references.pmid: 23887001
references.citation: Edelbring S, Broström O, Henriksson P, et al. Integrating virtual patients into courses: follow-up seminars and perceived benefit. Med Educ. 2012;46(4):417–25.
references.pmid: 22429178
references.citation: Frambach J, Driessen E, Chan L, van der Vleuten C. Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: how culture challenges self-directed learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(8):738–47.
references.pmid: 22803751
references.citation: MacLeod A. Six ways problem-based learning cases can sabotage patient-centered medical education. Acad Med. 2011;86(7):818–25.
references.pmid: 21617504
references.citation: Dewhurst D, Borgstein E, Grant ME, Begg M. Online virtual patients—A driver for change in medical and healthcare professional education in developing countries? Med Teach. 2009;31(8):721–4.
references.pmid: 19811208
references.citation: Bearman M. Is virtual the same as real? medical students’ experiences of a virtual patient. Acad Med. 2003;78(5):538–45.
references.pmid: 12742794
references.citation: Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. London: SAGE; 2013.
references.citation: Anderson T, Shattuck J. Design-based research: a decade of progress in education research? Educ Res. 2012;41(1):16–25.
references.citation: Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):312–9.
references.pmid: 19335572
references.citation: Rees CE, Monrouxe LV. Theory in medical education research: how do we get there? Med Educ. 2010;44(4):334–9.
references.pmid: 20444069
references.citation: Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science. Med Educ. 2009;43(3):196–8.
references.pmid: 19250344
references.citation: Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011;45(1):60–8.
references.pmid: 21155869
references.citation: Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ. 2010;44(4):358–66.
references.pmid: 20444071
references.citation: Ellaway R. Evaluating a virtual learning environment in medical education. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh; 2006. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/885/1/Ellaway_thesis.pdf . Accessed 22 July 2014.
references.citation: Edelbring S, Dastmalchi M, Hult H, Lundberg IE, Dahlgren LO. Experiencing virtual patients in clinical learning: a phenomenological study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16(3):331–45.
references.pmid: 21656337