title: Time-based event expectations employ relative, not absolute, representations of time.
abstract: When the timing of an event is predictable, humans automatically form implicit time-based event expectations. We investigated whether these expectations rely on absolute (e.g., 800 ms) or relative (e.g., a shorter duration) representations of time. In a choice-response task with two different pre-target intervals, participants implicitly learned that targets were predictable by interval durations. In a test phase, the two intervals were either considerably shortened or lengthened. In both cases, behavioral tendencies transferred from practice to test according to relative, not absolute, interval duration. We conclude that humans employ relative representations of time periods when forming time-based event expectations. These results suggest that learned time-based event expectations (e.g., in communication and human-machine interaction) should transfer to faster or slower environments if the relative temporal distribution of events is preserved.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany, Roland.Thomaschke@psychologie.uni-regensburg.de.
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thomaschke
authors.forename: Marina
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kunchulia
authors.forename: Gesine
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Dreisbach
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D056344:Executive Function / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Sep;125(3):307-23
references.pmid: 8830109
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Apr;38(2):336-49
references.pmid: 21806310
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2309-22
references.pmid: 21755419
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;197(1):91-100
references.pmid: 19543720
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):234-41
references.pmid: 15657597
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2013 May;95:40-9
references.pmid: 23353726
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug;39(4):1165-80
references.pmid: 23181686
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):566-79
references.pmid: 8316614
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1335-40
references.pmid: 23698617
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):953-64
references.pmid: 21264746
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1305-13
references.pmid: 18927012
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):113-7
references.pmid: 15116995
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2007 Feb 22;74(2):286-92
references.pmid: 17110057
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2010;57(6):436-45
references.pmid: 20382630
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2010 Dec;85(3):481-6
references.pmid: 20883744
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):388-407
references.pmid: 22369178
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 15;18(4):1559-70
references.pmid: 9454861
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):230-7
references.pmid: 24659170
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Jan;106(1-2):121-45
references.pmid: 11256335
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Apr 24;38(2):317-27
references.pmid: 12718864
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul 8;36:313-36
references.pmid: 23725000
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):708-17
references.pmid: 20883507
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Mar;14(3):217-23
references.pmid: 23403747
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Feb;41(1):196-218
references.pmid: 25419671
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):444-74
references.pmid: 6449531
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):297-307
references.pmid: 18804193
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9238-53
references.pmid: 21697374
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jun;133(6):EL471-7
references.pmid: 23742442
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Sep;3(9):860-2
references.pmid: 10966614
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jul;98(1):23-44
references.pmid: 22851790
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2289-300
references.pmid: 21970615
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3956-63
references.pmid: 9133413
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jul;3(3):216-28
references.pmid: 881613
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Sep 08;5:50
references.pmid: 21927599
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2005 Oct;67(7):1161-70
references.pmid: 16502838
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2003 Aug;67(3):153-9
references.pmid: 12955506
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Oct;18(5):910-6
references.pmid: 21698510
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):431-6
references.pmid: 18488664