title: Collective defence portfolios of ant hosts shift with social parasite pressure.
abstract: Host defences become increasingly costly as parasites breach successive lines of defence. Because selection favours hosts that successfully resist parasitism at the lowest possible cost, escalating coevolutionary arms races are likely to drive host defence portfolios towards ever more expensive strategies. We investigated the interplay between host defence portfolios and social parasite pressure by comparing 17 populations of two Temnothorax ant species. When successful, collective aggression not only prevents parasitation but also spares host colonies the cost of searching for and moving to a new nest site. However, once parasites breach the host's nest defence, host colonies should resort to flight as the more beneficial resistance strategy. We show that under low parasite pressure, host colonies more likely responded to an intruding Protomognathus americanus slavemaker with collective aggression, which prevented the slavemaker from escaping and potentially recruiting nest-mates. However, as parasite pressure increased, ant colonies of both host species became more likely to flee rather than to fight. We conclude that host defence portfolios shift consistently with social parasite pressure, which is in accordance with the degeneration of frontline defences and the evolution of subsequent anti-parasite strategies often invoked in hosts of brood parasites.
authors.affiliation: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes von Müller Weg 6, Mainz 55128, Germany evelien.jongepier@uni-mainz.de.
authors.forename: Evelien
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Jongepier
authors.affiliation: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes von Müller Weg 6, Mainz 55128, Germany.
authors.forename: Isabelle
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kleeberg
authors.affiliation: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes von Müller Weg 6, Mainz 55128, Germany.
authors.forename: Sylwester
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Job
authors.affiliation: Department of Evolutionary Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes von Müller Weg 6, Mainz 55128, Germany.
authors.forename: Susanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Foitzik
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression; D000818:Animals; D001000:Ants / Q000469:parasitology* / Q000502:physiology*; D006790:Host-Parasite Interactions; D011792:Quebec; D012919:Social Behavior; D014481:United States
keywords: brood parasites; defence portfolios; frontline defences; host–parasite interaction; social insects
references.citation: Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):316-23
references.pmid: 11308089
references.citation: Evolution. 2010 May;64(5):1459-69
references.pmid: 20015240
references.citation: Evolution. 1992 Apr;46(2):334-340
references.pmid: 28564028
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2007 May;98(5):249-58
references.pmid: 17344805
references.citation: Behav Ecol. 2011 Mar;22(2):255-260
references.pmid: 22476194
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Apr;63(4):1068-75
references.pmid: 19243573
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1989 Sep;4(9):274-8
references.pmid: 21227369
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2002 Nov;64(6):1045-68
references.pmid: 12508530
references.citation: Evolution. 2002 Oct;56(10):2067-82
references.pmid: 12449493
references.citation: Evolution. 2013 Dec;67(12):3545-55
references.pmid: 24299407
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2003 Oct;12(10):2809-16
references.pmid: 12969483
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011 Nov;86(4):836-52
references.pmid: 21223481
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2005 May;18(3):576-86
references.pmid: 15842487
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 May;90(5):1195-206
references.pmid: 19537541
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 2007 Apr;69(3):957-88
references.pmid: 17265120
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Mar 04;483(7389):328-30
references.pmid: 22388815
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Feb 10;19(3):235-40
references.pmid: 19185495
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1139-46
references.pmid: 11375101
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jun 13;417(6890):735-8
references.pmid: 12066183
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Apr;59(4):823-840
references.pmid: 10792938
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1585-94
references.pmid: 16910987