title: Quantification of penoxsulam in soil and rice samples by matrix solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction followed by HPLC-UV method.
abstract: The paper exploits the development of novel, simple and sensitive methodology involving matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the comparison of MSPD with liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) for the evaluation of residual penoxsulam in soil and rice samples. Extracted samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detector at 230 nm. Both methods were optimized, considering different parameters, and under optimum conditions, the mean recoveries obtained were in the range of 85-104 % for MSPD and 78.8-90.7 % for LLE. Precision values expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD) were ≤10 for MSPD and ≤15 for LLE. Linearity for penoxsulam was in the range of 0.01-20 μg mL(-1) with limits of detection and limits of quantification of 0.01 and 0.03 mg kg(-1), respectively.
authors.affiliation: Herbicide Residue Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India, pervi_7@yahoo.co.in.
authors.forename: Pervinder
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Kaur
authors.forename: Khushwinder
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kaur
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Bhullar
mesh_terms: D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000379:methods; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D006540:Herbicides / Q000032:analysis*; D059625:Liquid-Liquid Extraction / Q000379:methods; D012275:Oryza / Q000737:chemistry*; D012987:Soil / Q000737:chemistry*; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D052616:Solid Phase Extraction / Q000379:methods*; D013449:Sulfonamides / Q000032:analysis*; D014529:Uridine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000032:analysis
chemical_list: D006540:Herbicides; D012987:Soil; D012989:Soil Pollutants; D013449:Sulfonamides; C504402:penoxsulam; D014529:Uridine
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Mar;399(7):2539-47
references.pmid: 21221546
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Aug;155(1-4):31-8
references.pmid: 18587657
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 1998 Jan 19;46(1):152-156
references.pmid: 10554211
references.citation: Analyst. 1999 Jun;124(6):953-8
references.pmid: 10736879
references.citation: J Hazard Mater. 2009 May 30;164(2-3):918-22
references.pmid: 18930595
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2005 Apr 8;1070(1-2):171-7
references.pmid: 15861801
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jun;184(6):3463-8
references.pmid: 21713463
references.citation: Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Jan-Mar;15(1-2):231-9
references.pmid: 10188205
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Aug 9;54(16):5962-7
references.pmid: 16881702
references.citation: J Sep Sci. 2005 Jun;28(9-10):948-56
references.pmid: 16013821
references.citation: J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007 Mar 10;70(2):151-62
references.pmid: 17107714
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Jul;178(1-4):111-9
references.pmid: 20824333
references.citation: J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007 Mar 10;70(2):163-79
references.pmid: 17126908
references.citation: J Environ Sci Health B. 2007 Jun-Jul;42(5):481-90
references.pmid: 17562455
references.citation: J Hazard Mater. 2009 Sep 30;169(1-3):742-5
references.pmid: 19411135
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2000 Nov 3;897(1-2):405-13
references.pmid: 11128225
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Apr;175(1-4):103-8
references.pmid: 20480390
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2005 Dec 30;1100(2):236-42
references.pmid: 16212970
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Sep 7;53(18):7179-83
references.pmid: 16131127
references.citation: Talanta. 2010 Sep 15;82(4):1186-92
references.pmid: 20801317
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2013 Feb;185(2):1711-8
references.pmid: 22572798