title: Removal of nail polish and finger rings to prevent surgical infection.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Surgical wound infections may be caused by the transfer of bacteria from the hands of surgical teams to patients during operations. Surgical scrubbing prior to surgery reduces the number of bacteria on the skin, but wearing rings and nail polish on the fingers may reduce the efficacy of scrubbing, as bacteria may remain in microscopic imperfections of nail polish and on the skin beneath rings.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effect of the presence or absence of rings and nail polish on the hands of the surgical scrub team on postoperative wound infection rates.
  
  
  METHODS
  For this fifth update, we searched The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 23 July 2014); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid EMBASE and EBSCO CINAHL.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of wearing or removing finger rings and nail polish on the efficacy of the surgical scrub and postoperative wound infection rate.
  
  
  METHODS
  All abstracts were checked against a checklist to determine whether they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Full reports of relevant studies were obtained. Excluded trial reports were checked by all review authors to ensure appropriate exclusion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We identified: no new trials; no RCTs that compared wearing of rings with the removal of rings; and no trials of nail polish versus no nail polish that measured surgical infection rates. We found one small RCT (102 scrub nurses) that evaluated the effect of nail polish on the number of bacterial colony forming units left on hands after pre-operative surgical scrubbing. Nurses had either unpolished nails, freshly-applied nail polish (less than two days old), or old nail polish (more than four days old). There were no significant differences in the number of bacteria on hands between the groups before and after surgical scrubbing.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  No trials have investigated whether wearing nail polish or finger rings affects the rate of surgical wound infection. There is insufficient evidence to determine whether wearing nail polish affects the number of bacteria on the skin post-scrub.
authors.affiliation: c/o Cochrane Wounds Group, University of York, Heslington, York, UK, YO10 5DD.
authors.forename: Vickie A
authors.initials: VA
authors.lastname: Arrowsmith
authors.forename: Rosemary
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Taylor
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000302:isolation & purification; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D003358:Cosmetics / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013502:General Surgery; D006225:Hand / Q000382:microbiology*; D006235:Hand Disinfection; D006801:Humans; D055498:Jewelry / Q000382:microbiology*; D007764:Lacquer / Q000382:microbiology*; D009262:Nails / Q000382:microbiology*; D009740:Nursing Staff; D009872:Operating Room Technicians; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000517:prevention & control*
chemical_list: D003358:Cosmetics
references.citation: AORN J. 1993 Jul;58(1):84-8
references.pmid: 8338363
references.citation: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jan 19;290(6463):206-7
references.pmid: 3917754
references.citation: Nurs Stand. 1998 Sep 9-15;12(51):35-9; quiz 41-2
references.pmid: 9823164
references.citation: Nurs Times. 1998 Jan 28-Feb 3;94(4):63-6
references.pmid: 9510814
references.citation: NATNEWS. 1982 Apr;19(4):19-25
references.pmid: 6918784
references.citation: Nurs Times. 1997 Sep 10-16;93(37):suppl 1-2
references.pmid: 9348939
references.citation: Am J Infect Control. 1997 Feb;25(1):24-7
references.pmid: 9057940
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1985 May-Jun;34(3):186-8
references.pmid: 3889854
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;47(1):54-9
references.pmid: 9478185
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
references.pmid: 12958120
references.citation: AORN J. 1994 Nov;60(5):796, 799-805
references.pmid: 7826049
references.citation: AORN J. 1999 Apr;69(4):842, 845-50
references.pmid: 11838095