title: The role of professional societies in limiting indication creep.
abstract: New technology is a major driver of health care inflation. One contributor to this inflation is indication creep, the diffusion of interventions that have been proven beneficial in specific patient populations into untested broader populations who may be less likely to benefit. Professional societies sometimes promote indication creep, as we illustrate with the case of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Professional societies are in a unique position to limit indication creep. We propose that, at a minimum, professional societies should refrain from recommending new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies in their guidelines until they have been proven beneficial in the targeted populations. In some circumstances, professional societies could be more active in combatting indication creep, either recommending against expanded use of clinical interventions when evidence is lacking, or coordinating efforts to collect data in these broader populations.
authors.affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 2024 E. Monument Street, Room 2-604B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, kriggs3@jhmi.edu.
authors.forename: Kevin R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Riggs
authors.forename: Peter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Ubel
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D024382:Professional Role; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D012955:Societies, Medical / Q000592:standards*
references.citation: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Sep;2(5):421-8
references.pmid: 20031872
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):557-63
references.pmid: 11856794
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 5;369(23):2197-206
references.pmid: 24237006
references.citation: BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):285
references.pmid: 9472515
references.citation: JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):2005-6
references.pmid: 21586716
references.citation: Circulation. 2005 Dec 13;112(24 Suppl):IV1-203
references.pmid: 16314375
references.citation: JAMA. 1999 Feb 3;281(5):446-53
references.pmid: 9952205
references.citation: Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
references.pmid: 14568747
references.citation: JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1801-2
references.pmid: 22492759
references.citation: JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):831-41
references.pmid: 19244190
references.citation: CMAJ. 2007 Sep 25;177(7):697, 699
references.pmid: 17823137
references.citation: Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2848-55
references.pmid: 21478500
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1276-84
references.pmid: 19738242
references.citation: Blood. 2012 Feb 9;119(6):1356-62
references.pmid: 22223819
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 May 4;324(7345):1088-92
references.pmid: 11991918
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):549-56
references.pmid: 11856793
references.citation: Resuscitation. 2001 Oct;51(1):17-25
references.pmid: 11719169
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):18-22
references.pmid: 21220656