title: Response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens predicts behavior in an independent test of honesty.
abstract: This study examines the cognitive and neural determinants of honesty and dishonesty. Human subjects undergoing fMRI completed a monetary incentive delay task eliciting responses to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens. Subjects next performed an incentivized prediction task, giving them real and repeated opportunities for dishonest gain. Subjects attempted to predict the outcomes of random computerized coin-flips and were financially rewarded for accuracy. In some trials, subjects were rewarded based on self-reported accuracy, allowing them to gain money dishonestly by lying. Dishonest behavior was indexed by improbably high levels of self-reported accuracy. Nucleus accumbens response in the first task, involving only honest rewards, accounted for ∼25% of the variance in dishonest behavior in the prediction task. Individuals showing relatively strong nucleus accumbens responses to anticipated reward also exhibited increased dorsolateral prefrontal activity (bilateral) in response to opportunities for dishonest gain. These results address two hypotheses concerning (dis)honesty. According to the "Will" hypothesis, honesty results from the active deployment of self-control. According to the "Grace" hypothesis, honesty flows more automatically. The present results suggest a reconciliation between these two hypotheses while explaining (dis)honesty in terms of more basic neural mechanisms: relatively weak responses to anticipated rewards make people morally "Graceful," but individuals who respond more strongly may resist temptation by force of Will.
authors.affiliation: Kokoro Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan, and abe.nobuhito.7s@kyoto-u.ac.jp.
authors.forename: Nobuhito
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9897-4414
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Abe
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
authors.forename: Joshua D
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-2966
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Greene
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001931:Brain Mapping; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation / Q000502:physiology*; D009714:Nucleus Accumbens / Q000098:blood supply / Q000502:physiology*; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012201:Reward; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D010100:Oxygen
keywords: dishonesty; fMRI; moral; morality; nucleus accumbens; reward
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar;100(3):407-25
references.pmid: 21280961
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:279-89
references.pmid: 24001457
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Dec;14(6):769-76
references.pmid: 15582382
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1264-70
references.pmid: 22972904
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2011 Oct;17(5):560-74
references.pmid: 21454323
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56
references.pmid: 17329432
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):59-63
references.pmid: 16406760
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
references.pmid: 10846167
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Dec;22(6):594-600
references.pmid: 19786872
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7
references.pmid: 10875899
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
references.pmid: 12880848
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references.pmid: 18545266
references.citation: Science. 2012 Mar 16;335(6074):1351-5
references.pmid: 22422983
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):RC159
references.pmid: 11459880
references.citation: J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(3):594-597
references.pmid: 20047023
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Oct;32(10):1557-65
references.pmid: 20845394
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 28;106(30):12506-11
references.pmid: 19622733
references.citation: Science. 2004 Oct 15;306(5695):503-7
references.pmid: 15486304
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):4-26
references.pmid: 19812543
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Aug 26;67(4):667-77
references.pmid: 20797542
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:1061-9
references.pmid: 23313571
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Feb 15;445(7129):727-31
references.pmid: 17301784
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 May;12(5):193-200
references.pmid: 18403252
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):419-21
references.pmid: 20228805
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34
references.pmid: 11699120
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202
references.pmid: 11283309
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19
references.pmid: 10197361
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr;13(4):501-6
references.pmid: 20190745
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12(17):3683-7
references.pmid: 11726774
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1148-53
references.pmid: 19328237
references.citation: Science. 1997 Mar 14;275(5306):1593-9
references.pmid: 9054347