title: The Multidimensional Structure of Subjective Well-Being In Later Life.
abstract: Subjective well-being can be measured in different ways, depending on the conceptual perspective one adopts. Hedonic well-being, emphasising emotions and evaluation, is often contrasted with eudemonic well-being, stressing self-actualisation and autonomy. In this paper we investigate the background, structure and compatibility of empirical measures of hedonic and eudemonic well-being in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We use a confirmatory factor approach to investigate the internal of structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D), Satisfaction with Life scale (SWLS) and CASP, a measure of quality of life in old age. In a second step, we examine the higher order structure of well-being using these measures. Next to highlighting specific issues about the structure of these measures in connection to older populations, we illustrate that a threefold structure, distinguishing affective, cognitive and eudemonic aspects of well-being, is more informative than the two dimensional hedonic and eudemonic well-being that is often propagated.
authors.affiliation: Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
authors.forename: Bram
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Vanhoutte
keywords: Confirmatory factor analysis; Measurement; Subjective well-being
references.citation: BMJ. 2005 Dec 24;331(7531):1548-51
references.pmid: 16373748
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2549-59
references.pmid: 23504522
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 1995 Dec 24;36(1-2):65-75
references.pmid: 8988267
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jun;119(6):997-1004
references.pmid: 6731436
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
references.pmid: 3397865
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2007 Sep;62(6):612-3
references.pmid: 17874913
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):193-210
references.pmid: 3283814
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1411-26
references.pmid: 14583411
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2005 Jun;17(2):231-6
references.pmid: 16029110
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 2001 Jun;65(1):19-26
references.pmid: 11426505
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1908-10
references.pmid: 16809528
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1997 Aug;37(4):433-40
references.pmid: 9279031
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141-66
references.pmid: 11148302
references.citation: JAMA. 1997 Oct 8;278(14):1186-90
references.pmid: 9326481
references.citation: Psychiatry Res. 2010 May 15;177(1-2):120-3
references.pmid: 20207424
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 May;26(3):132-8
references.pmid: 1887291
references.citation: J Aging Health. 1993 May;5(2):179-93
references.pmid: 10125443
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):719-27
references.pmid: 7473027
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2008 Oct 14;8:355
references.pmid: 18854015
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):810-9
references.pmid: 8636900
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):542-75
references.pmid: 6399758
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1383-94
references.pmid: 15347530
references.citation: J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
references.pmid: 16367493
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):166-71
references.pmid: 21228133
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):5-14
references.pmid: 11392865
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
references.pmid: 11392867
references.citation: Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):727-33
references.pmid: 12451153
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Jun 4-10;365(9475):1961-70
references.pmid: 15936426
references.citation: Aging Ment Health. 2003 May;7(3):186-94
references.pmid: 12775399
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2000 Aug;91(1):62-8
references.pmid: 11011872