title: The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters.
abstract: A key component of social understanding is the ability to read intentions from movements. But how do we discern intentions in others' actions? What kind of intention information is actually available in the features of others' movements? Based on the assumption that intentions are hidden away in the other person's mind, standard theories of social cognition have mainly focused on the contribution of higher level processes. Here, we delineate an alternative approach to the problem of intention-from-movement understanding. We argue that intentions become "visible" in the surface flow of agents' motions. Consequently, the ability to understand others' intentions cannot be divorced from the capability to detect essential kinematics. This hypothesis has far reaching implications for how we know other minds and predict others' behavior.
authors.affiliation: Department of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Italian Institute of Technology Genova, Italy.
authors.forename: Caterina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ansuini
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Torino Torino, Italy.
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cavallo
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Torino Torino, Italy.
authors.forename: Cesare
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bertone
authors.affiliation: Department of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Italian Institute of Technology Genova, Italy ; Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Torino Torino, Italy.
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Becchio
keywords: action observation; intention; kinematics; reach-to-grasp; social interaction
references.citation: Can J Psychol. 1987 Sep;41(3):365-78
references.pmid: 3502905
references.citation: Front Neurorobot. 2013 Oct 04;7:14
references.pmid: 24109450
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2007 Sep;39(5):353-67
references.pmid: 17827113
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2012 Jul;76(4):434-45
references.pmid: 22398683
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 15;48(3):564-84
references.pmid: 19524046
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2010 Sep 1;169(3):1158-67
references.pmid: 20538048
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):493-501
references.pmid: 21227300
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2009 Sep;18(3):766-72
references.pmid: 19632134
references.citation: Cogn Process. 2007 Sep;8(3):159-66
references.pmid: 17429704
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(2):261-75
references.pmid: 23247469
references.citation: Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):662-7
references.pmid: 15860620
references.citation: Motor Control. 2005 Jul;9(3):332-51
references.pmid: 16239719
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Sep;6(9):726-36
references.pmid: 16100518
references.citation: Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):415-33
references.pmid: 16516188
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Sep;17(3):557-64
references.pmid: 17446089
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Nov;38(10):3507-12
references.pmid: 23961848
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):590-616
references.pmid: 17706312
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Jun;17(2):535-43
references.pmid: 18442924
references.citation: Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):242-52
references.pmid: 21349505
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jul;212(1):119-24
references.pmid: 21547559
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):894-912
references.pmid: 17585893
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(2):273-84
references.pmid: 21863262
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):3050-9
references.pmid: 22019857
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 25;18(6):454-7
references.pmid: 18356050
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):547-56
references.pmid: 21465414
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Apr;11(4):153-7
references.pmid: 17300981
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):1095-104
references.pmid: 23545395
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):393-414
references.pmid: 23883742
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Aug;15(8):352-7
references.pmid: 21775191
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Jul 17;17(14):1235-40
references.pmid: 17629484
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92
references.pmid: 15217330
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Oct;14(10):441-7
references.pmid: 20674467
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):21-5
references.pmid: 15639437
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Apr;9(4):174-9
references.pmid: 15808499
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):240-8
references.pmid: 22440652
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Apr 1;5(4):171-178
references.pmid: 11287271
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2792-800
references.pmid: 21414901
references.citation: Perception. 2008;37(6):931-48
references.pmid: 18686711
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2456-65
references.pmid: 16381806
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 May;11(5):194-6
references.pmid: 17344090
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(1):111-9
references.pmid: 17909766
references.citation: Motor Control. 2006 Oct;10(4):311-29
references.pmid: 17293615