title: Conflict adaptation is predicted by the cognitive, but not the affective alexithymia dimension.
abstract: Stimulus-induced response conflict (e.g., in Simon or Stroop tasks) is often reduced after conflict trials-the Gratton effect. It is generally assumed that this effect is due to a strengthening of the representation of the current intention or goal, which in turn increases the degree of stimulus and/or response control. Recent evidence suggests that the motivational signal driving the Gratton effect might be affective in nature. If so, individual differences in either the strength of affective signals and/or the ability to interpret such signals might explain individual differences in cognitive-control adjustments as reflected in the Gratton effect. We tested this hypothesis by relating individual sizes of the Gratton effect in a Simon task to scores on the affective and the cognitive dimension of the Bermond/Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire (BVAQ)-which we assumed to assess individual differences in affective-signal strength and ability to interpret affective signals, respectively. Results show that the cognitive, but not the affective dimension predicted control adjustment, while the accuracy of heartbeat detection was only (and only weakly) related to online control. This suggests that the motivation to fine-tune one's cognitive-control operations is mediated by, and may depend on one's ability to interpret one's own affective signals.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Michiel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: de Galan
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Roberta
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sellaro
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Lorenza S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Colzato
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Hommel
keywords: Alexithymia; Gratton effect; Simon effect; cognitive control; conflict adaptation
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Dec;28(6):1345-63
references.pmid: 12542132
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1701-18
references.pmid: 24708397
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55976
references.pmid: 23405242
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2012 Jul;90(3):234-41
references.pmid: 22504294
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):131-41
references.pmid: 23230991
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 May;41(3):476-82
references.pmid: 15102134
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1469-74
references.pmid: 19759538
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Dec;121(4):480-506
references.pmid: 1431740
references.citation: J Pers. 1977 Jun;45(2):191-206
references.pmid: 328850
references.citation: Emotion. 2007 Feb;7(1):68-76
references.pmid: 17352564
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1057-64
references.pmid: 22798023
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):189-95
references.pmid: 14730305
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Dec 31;6:342
references.pmid: 23293597
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):287-97
references.pmid: 12466926
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):176-86
references.pmid: 21745649
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Apr;38(2):290-301
references.pmid: 22201469
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2004 Feb;68(1):1-17
references.pmid: 14752663
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Aug 27;8(8):e72626
references.pmid: 24013455
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70
references.pmid: 19096369
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jun;13(6):252-7
references.pmid: 19428288
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1992 Mar;29(2):218-22
references.pmid: 1635964
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1989;40:109-31
references.pmid: 2648973
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Mar;75(3):227-33
references.pmid: 19951721
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Dec;20(12):1473-7
references.pmid: 19906127
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;12(2):280-6
references.pmid: 22218750
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 03;6:3
references.pmid: 22347176
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207
references.pmid: 24203654
references.citation: Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Sep;65(3):214-27
references.pmid: 17543405
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709
references.pmid: 12374324
references.citation: Neuron. 2013 Feb 20;77(4):624-38
references.pmid: 23439117
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2470-6
references.pmid: 21208964
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references.pmid: 11488380
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):356-66
references.pmid: 18189009
references.citation: Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(2):97-112
references.pmid: 18633852
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov;21(11):1629-34
references.pmid: 20943936
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Feb;136(2):189-202
references.pmid: 20507830
references.citation: J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1149-75
references.pmid: 21241306
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1999 Apr;101(2-3):379-94
references.pmid: 10344191