title: Can adaptive modulation of traits to urban environments facilitate Ricinus communis L. invasiveness?
abstract: This paper addresses the phenotypic variation among Ricinus communis L. populations in four urban habitat types (road verges, garbage dumps, construction debris, and natural area) in Delhi, India, by evaluating important traits such as plant height, basal circumference, seeds per plant, seed size, seed weight, specific leaf area, and reproductive index. An important biochemical marker, proline, considered as a good plant performance indicator under stress was also quantified in leaves of R. communis to evaluate its response in different habitats. Interestingly, the species showed significant variation in plant height, specific leaf area, seed size, seed weight, and leaf proline content in different habitat types. Leaf proline content was positively related to plant height, specific leaf area, and seed size while negatively related to the total number of seeds/plant. Interestingly, reproductive index, calculated as a ratio of the total number of seeds to the plant height also showed a negative relation with leaf proline content. Results indicated that R. communis exhibits adaptive modulation of growth, reproductive traits, and leaf proline content in various urban habitats which contributes to invasiveness, range expansion, and establishment of the species. The study also gives evidence of how morphological and physiological traits could directly affect invasiveness of R. communis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007, India.
authors.forename: Neha
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Goyal
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pardha-Saradhi
authors.forename: Gyan P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Sharma
mesh_terms: D017753:Ecosystem; D004777:Environment; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D007194:India; D058865:Introduced Species; D010641:Phenotype; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000737:chemistry; D011392:Proline / Q000032:analysis; D012278:Ricinus / Q000254:growth & development*; D012639:Seeds / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D011392:Proline
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Oct;157(1-4):191-8
references.pmid: 18855111
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Feb 6;421(6923):625-7
references.pmid: 12571594
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(7):1429-38
references.pmid: 22247125
references.citation: Oecologia. 1998 Jan;113(2):188-196
references.pmid: 28308196
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Feb;13(2):235-45
references.pmid: 20002494
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):981-93
references.pmid: 16913942
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13730-4
references.pmid: 9391094
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):223-8
references.pmid: 16701373
references.citation: Science. 2001 Oct 12;294(5541):321-6
references.pmid: 11598291
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2009 Nov;4(11):1016-8
references.pmid: 20009553
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):481-6
references.pmid: 16701424
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):531-42
references.pmid: 15459883
references.citation: Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(2):183-192
references.pmid: 28308558
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 May;10(5):212-7
references.pmid: 21237012
references.citation: Oecologia. 1993 Mar;93(3):336-342
references.pmid: 28313432
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Apr 6;209(1):1-5
references.pmid: 7726821
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1499-512
references.pmid: 17601142
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2006 Feb;16(1):166-75
references.pmid: 16705970
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Dec;5(12):537-42
references.pmid: 11120476
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2008 Aug;83(3):315-37
references.pmid: 18979594
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993 May 28;193(1):54-8
references.pmid: 8503937
references.citation: Ecology. 2013 May;94(5):985-94
references.pmid: 23858639
references.citation: Evol Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):25-33
references.pmid: 12492406
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Nov;7(11):1456-66
references.pmid: 22951402
references.citation: Science. 2013 Oct 18;342(6156):364-6
references.pmid: 24136968
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):58-66
references.pmid: 22889499