title: Initial pain management plans in response to severe pain indicators on oncology clinic previsit questionnaires.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The issue of how to address patient pain in the outpatient setting remains challenging. At the London Regional Cancer Program (London, Ontario), patients complete the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) before most visits.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To perform a chart review assessing the frequency and, if applicable, the type of a clinical care plan that was developed if a patient indicated pain ≥7 on a 10-point scale.
  
  
  METHODS
  The charts of 100 eligible sequential outpatient visits were reviewed and the initial pain management approaches were documented.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between December 2011 and May 2012, visits by 7265 unique patients included 100 eligible visits (pain ≥7 of 10). In 83 cases, active pain management plans, ranging from counselling to hospital admission, were proposed. Active pain management plans were more likely if the cause was believed to be cancer⁄treatment related: 63 of 65 (96.9%) versus 20 of 35&nbsp;(57.1%, noncancer⁄unknown pain cause); P<0.001. There were no differences depending on cancer treatment intent or medical service.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Active pain management plans were documented in 83% of visits. However, patients who reported severe pain that was assessed as benign or unknown in etiology received intervention less frequently, perhaps indicating that oncologists either consider themselves less responsible for noncancer pain, or believe that pain chronicity may lead to a higher ESAS pain score without indicating a need for acute intervention. Further study is needed to determine the subsequent effect of the care plans on patient-reported ESAS pain scores at future clinic visits.
authors.forename: Michael S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Sanatani
authors.forename: Maan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kattan
authors.forename: Dwight E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Moulin
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000150:complications; D010045:Outpatients; D059408:Pain Management / Q000379:methods*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):185-8
references.pmid: 16606379
references.citation: Med Care. 1992 May;30(5 Suppl):MS74-84
references.pmid: 1583942
references.citation: Acad Med. 1997 Sep;72(9):798-800
references.pmid: 9311323
references.citation: Eur J Pain. 2008 Jul;12(5):582-90
references.pmid: 18023377
references.citation: J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):6-9
references.pmid: 1714502
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep;44(3):340-50
references.pmid: 22699092
references.citation: Support Care Cancer. 2011 Nov;19(11):1865-71
references.pmid: 21052733
references.citation: Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;52(4):383-9
references.pmid: 18339446
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):241-9
references.pmid: 19963335
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):259-67
references.pmid: 20152589
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Aug;26(2):716-22
references.pmid: 12906956
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):592-6
references.pmid: 7508092
references.citation: Ann Oncol. 2008 Dec;19(12):1985-91
references.pmid: 18632721
references.citation: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jan;37(1):77-84
references.pmid: 18504094
references.citation: J Oncol Pract. 2011 Jan;7(1):19-23
references.pmid: 21532805