title: An evolutionary model explaining the Neolithic transition from egalitarianism to leadership and despotism.
abstract: The Neolithic was marked by a transition from small and relatively egalitarian groups to much larger groups with increased stratification. But, the dynamics of this remain poorly understood. It is hard to see how despotism can arise without coercion, yet coercion could not easily have occurred in an egalitarian setting. Using a quantitative model of evolution in a patch-structured population, we demonstrate that the interaction between demographic and ecological factors can overcome this conundrum. We model the coevolution of individual preferences for hierarchy alongside the degree of despotism of leaders, and the dispersal preferences of followers. We show that voluntary leadership without coercion can evolve in small groups, when leaders help to solve coordination problems related to resource production. An example is coordinating construction of an irrigation system. Our model predicts that the transition to larger despotic groups will then occur when: (i) surplus resources lead to demographic expansion of groups, removing the viability of an acephalous niche in the same area and so locking individuals into hierarchy; (ii) high dispersal costs limit followers' ability to escape a despot. Empirical evidence suggests that these conditions were probably met, for the first time, during the subsistence intensification of the Neolithic.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland simon.powers@unil.ch.
authors.forename: Simon T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Powers
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Laurent
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lehmann
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D001318:Authoritarianism; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003710:Demography; D006801:Humans; D007857:Leadership; D008954:Models, Biological
keywords: Neolithic; despotism; dispersal; egalitarian; hierarchy; leadership
references.citation: Science. 1970 Aug 21;169(3947):733-8
references.pmid: 17820299
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Jun;60(6):1137-51
references.pmid: 16892965
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):323-9
references.pmid: 18812292
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):354-71
references.pmid: 17201593
references.citation: Curr Anthropol. 2009 Oct;50(5):603-8
references.pmid: 20642145
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1981;16:1-388
references.pmid: 7300842
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1356-64
references.pmid: 24015852
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2010 Aug 21;265(4):633-46
references.pmid: 20665973
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 22;108(12):4760-5
references.pmid: 21383181
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2009 Oct 13;19(19):R911-6
references.pmid: 19825357
references.citation: Science. 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):560-1
references.pmid: 21798934