title: How cognitive neuroscience could be more biological-and what it might learn from clinical neuropsychology.
abstract: Three widespread assumptions of Cognitive-affective Neuroscience are discussed: first, mental functions are assumed to be localized in circumscribed brain areas which can be exactly determined, at least in principle (localizationism). Second, this assumption is associated with the more general claim that these functions (and dysfunctions, such as in neurological or mental diseases) are somehow generated inside the brain (internalism). Third, these functions are seen to be "biological" in the sense that they can be decomposed and finally explained on the basis of elementary biological causes (i.e., genetic, molecular, neurophysiological etc.), causes that can be identified by experimental methods as the gold standard (isolationism). Clinical neuropsychology is widely assumed to support these tenets. However, by making reference to the ideas of Kurt Goldstein (1878-1965), one of its most important founders, I argue that none of these assumptions is sufficiently supported. From the perspective of a clinical-neuropsychological practitioner, assessing and treating brain damage sequelae reveals a quite different picture of the brain as well as of us "brain carriers", making the organism (or person) in its specific environment the crucial reference point. This conclusion can be further elaborated: all experimental and clinical research on humans presupposes the notion of a situated, reflecting, and interacting subject, which precedes all kinds of scientific decomposition, however useful. These implications support the core assumptions of the embodiment approach to brain and mind, and, as I argue, Goldstein and his clinical-neuropsychological observations are part of its very origin, for both theoretical and historical reasons.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Frisch
keywords: clinical neuropsychology; critical neuroscience; embodiment; kurt goldstein; localization; psychological experiments
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2000 Feb 7;11(2):237-40
references.pmid: 10674462
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002 Mar;8(3):448-60
references.pmid: 11939702
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Oct 1;6(10):416-421
references.pmid: 12413574
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2000 Jan;71(1):18-21
references.pmid: 10716795
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;88(6):3359-71
references.pmid: 12466452
references.citation: NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32(4):751-9
references.pmid: 23867401
references.citation: Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):195-231
references.pmid: 21162368
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 05;4:582
references.pmid: 24046754
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:285-93
references.pmid: 16226591
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2000;63(3-4):279-88
references.pmid: 11004881
references.citation: Science. 1980 Dec 12;210(4475):1232-4
references.pmid: 7434023
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 20;98(24):13763-8
references.pmid: 11698650
references.citation: Brain Inj. 2001 May;15(5):413-28
references.pmid: 11350655
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Sep;3(9):345-351
references.pmid: 10461197
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):234-9
references.pmid: 12612636
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jun 15;316(5831):1578-9
references.pmid: 17569852
references.citation: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;1(1):108-118
references.pmid: 26272844
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Jan;9(1):31-44
references.pmid: 12570356
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):457-69
references.pmid: 9545989
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Aug;33(4):245-66; discussion 266-313
references.pmid: 20964882
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 1997 Jun;34(1):72-87
references.pmid: 9209756
references.citation: Neurology. 2006 Mar 28;66(6):906-10
references.pmid: 16567710
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Jul 21;370(9583):262
references.pmid: 17658396
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):572-7
references.pmid: 14527617
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2013 May 1;71:298-306
references.pmid: 22906784
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 May;28(3-4):241-50
references.pmid: 21416411
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1997 Feb;5(2):164-71
references.pmid: 9345546
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Sep;14(9):659-64
references.pmid: 23958663
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Jul;11(4):488-93
references.pmid: 16209430
references.citation: Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):35-48
references.pmid: 24411730
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):566-89
references.pmid: 18609012
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):59-63
references.pmid: 16406760
references.citation: Science. 2006 Feb 3;311(5761):617-8
references.pmid: 16456067
references.citation: PLoS One. 2007 Oct 24;2(10):e1060
references.pmid: 17957244
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Nov 2;294(17):2221-4
references.pmid: 16264165
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2012 May 17;210:118-27
references.pmid: 22465437
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):1116-20
references.pmid: 22261373
references.citation: Brain Inj. 2004 Nov;18(11):1067-81
references.pmid: 15545205
references.citation: Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003 Dec;18(8):811-25
references.pmid: 14609578
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jan 07;7:918
references.pmid: 24431995
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):627-50
references.pmid: 18609024
references.citation: Int J Neurosci. 2007 Jul;117(7):935-69
references.pmid: 17613107
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Feb 9;359(9305):473
references.pmid: 11853792
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Nov 6;60(3):409-11
references.pmid: 18995813
references.citation: Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):30-4
references.pmid: 21371977
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Nov;5(11):826-37
references.pmid: 15520792
references.citation: Neuron. 2011 Dec 8;72(5):692-7
references.pmid: 22153367
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2002 May;51(5):567-77
references.pmid: 12112102
references.citation: Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2005 Jun;36(2):373-95
references.pmid: 19260197
references.citation: Brain. 1991 Apr;114 ( Pt 2):727-41
references.pmid: 2043945
references.citation: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(3):329-36
references.pmid: 23458357
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):513-21
references.pmid: 18923999
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2013 May;227(1):93-100
references.pmid: 23564316
references.citation: J Neuropsychol. 2012 Sep;6(2):257-69
references.pmid: 22329754
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2000 Oct-Nov;13(8-9):861-70
references.pmid: 11156197
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):333-339
references.pmid: 12140083
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;67(2):169-73
references.pmid: 10406983
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):541-52
references.pmid: 18095278
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Feb;6(2):119-26
references.pmid: 12555104
references.citation: Brain. 2007 Apr;130(Pt 4):898-914
references.pmid: 17121742
references.citation: J Anat. 2004 Dec;205(6):433-42
references.pmid: 15610392
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;17(4):153-5
references.pmid: 23507449
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55251
references.pmid: 23457466
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2000 Jan;11(1):66-84
references.pmid: 10686118
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1229-38
references.pmid: 10466148
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Oct 1;5(10):418-425
references.pmid: 11707380