title: Incidental findings detection using low tube potential for CT pulmonary angiography.
abstract: While lowering the radiation dose using a reduced tube potential (kVp) strategy for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) maintains accuracy for pulmonary embolism detection, there is no data regarding the effect of increased noise from lower kVp on both the accuracy of lung and mediastinum lesion detection in the same patient cohort. This study compares the accuracy and diagnostic confidence of lung nodules and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes detection between low and standard kVp CTPA. The study cohort included 272 CTPA studies acquired at low kVp and 274 studies at standard kVp. Each patient had a routine chest CT acquired within 60 days of the CTPA that served as a reference standard for lung and mediastinum lesions. In additional to the evaluation of image quality, two radiologists independently interpreted lung nodules and mediastinal lymph nodes on CTPA and recorded confidence level for each interpretation. Multivariate models assessed effect of kVp settings on diagnostic accuracy and confidence level in interpretation. Low kVp CTPAs had higher image noise. A significant decrease in the confidence levels for evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes was observed at low kVp by one of two readers, although there was no significant correlation between accuracy of interpretation and kVp settings for lung and mediastinum lesion detection (adjusted odds ratios = 0.67-1.22, p values >0.2). While increased image noise may decrease the diagnostic confidence of the radiologist, the detection of lung nodules and enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes was not compromised. Referring clinicians can expect that lower radiation dose CTPA answers questions related to lungs and mediastinum.
authors.affiliation: Applied Imaging Science Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, kkumamaru@partners.org.
authors.forename: Kanako K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Kumamaru
authors.forename: Frank J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Rybicki
authors.forename: Rachna
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Madan
authors.forename: Ritu
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gill
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Wake
authors.forename: Andetta R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Hunsaker
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D016015:Logistic Models; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008482:Mediastinum; D008875:Middle Aged; D061330:Multidetector Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D055613:Multiple Pulmonary Nodules / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D015588:Observer Variation; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011651:Pulmonary Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011655:Pulmonary Embolism / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D003074:Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 1999 Aug;29(8):565-9
references.pmid: 10415177
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov;197(5):W852-9
references.pmid: 22021532
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 2009 Dec;44(12):793-9
references.pmid: 19884825
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1961-5
references.pmid: 19933956
references.citation: Clin Imaging. 2008 Sep-Oct;32(5):335-41
references.pmid: 18760719
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):899-907
references.pmid: 17114631
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):649-57
references.pmid: 15498896
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2002 Jun;12(6):1571-6
references.pmid: 12042970
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1651-6
references.pmid: 19457830
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2013 Jan;20(1):39-44
references.pmid: 22898866
references.citation: Eur J Radiol. 2012 Apr;81(4):e580-4
references.pmid: 21763091
references.citation: Intern Med J. 2013 Feb;43(2):169-74
references.pmid: 22909177
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1019-24
references.pmid: 19770324
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):8-18
references.pmid: 22733888
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2009 Aug;19(8):1914-22
references.pmid: 19333605
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2002 Nov;12(11):2764-9
references.pmid: 12386771
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):116-24
references.pmid: 14645883
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):260-70
references.pmid: 20121673
references.citation: Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Feb;10(1):100
references.pmid: 20408324
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1966-8
references.pmid: 19933957
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 2008 Dec;43(12):871-6
references.pmid: 19002059
references.citation: Radiology. 2012 Feb;262(2):468-74
references.pmid: 22187633
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Oct;183(4):1093-6
references.pmid: 15385312
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2000 Jul;41(4):352-6
references.pmid: 10937757
references.citation: Ulster Med J. 2008 Sep;77(3):175-80
references.pmid: 18956799
references.citation: Emerg Radiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):437-45
references.pmid: 22527361
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):690-7
references.pmid: 16857975
references.citation: Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):453-61
references.pmid: 19710005
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):169-74
references.pmid: 15068946
references.citation: J Thorac Imaging. 2013 May;28(3):196-201
references.pmid: 23478511
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):W118-24
references.pmid: 20651170
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):577-83
references.pmid: 17940308
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1881-7
references.pmid: 19901140