title: Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses.
abstract: Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute tointergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Glückschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We find also that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.
authors.affiliation: Harvard University.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cikara
authors.affiliation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bruneau
authors.affiliation: New York University.
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Van Bavel
authors.affiliation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Saxe
keywords: Competition; Conflict; Empathy; Intergroup; Schadenfreude; Social Identity
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1383-96
references.pmid: 19025290
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;3(2):87-93
references.pmid: 26158875
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 15;51(4):1468-75
references.pmid: 20302945
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Apr;31(4):443-53
references.pmid: 15743980
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):793-806
references.pmid: 18391025
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):466-9
references.pmid: 16421576
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Apr;103(2):336-55
references.pmid: 8637962
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Jun;7(5):596-603
references.pmid: 21705345
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902
references.pmid: 12051578
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Mar;88(3):532-46
references.pmid: 15740444
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):953-66
references.pmid: 8939043
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):698-722
references.pmid: 12956540
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):985-97
references.pmid: 19425830
references.citation: Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):
references.pmid: 24416471
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Nov;7(8):909-16
references.pmid: 22156723
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jun;36(6):768-79
references.pmid: 20445026
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Dec;30(12):1537-49
references.pmid: 15536238
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1063-79
references.pmid: 18954194
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 17;3:389
references.pmid: 23087657
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Nov;95(5):1136-49
references.pmid: 18954198
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):932-43
references.pmid: 12757139
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):1018-22
references.pmid: 20537539
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):3791-803
references.pmid: 21671744
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 5;367(1589):717-30
references.pmid: 22271787
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;56(3):364-73
references.pmid: 2926634
references.citation: J Exp Soc Psychol. 1997 Jul;33(4):401-20
references.pmid: 9247370
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;45(Pt 2):357-71
references.pmid: 16869064
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):77-83
references.pmid: 17188552
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Apr;92(4):631-48
references.pmid: 17469949
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan 1;23(1):77-85
references.pmid: 22157677
references.citation: Neuron. 2010 Oct 6;68(1):149-60
references.pmid: 20920798
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8525-9
references.pmid: 19571143
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Mar;76(3):388-402
references.pmid: 10101876
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1131-9
references.pmid: 19076485
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;35(3):321-35
references.pmid: 19098257
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;79(4):602-16
references.pmid: 11045741
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Dec;38(12):3139-44
references.pmid: 24099859
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):R478-80
references.pmid: 20541493
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jun-Jul;106(2-3):115-28
references.pmid: 20202649
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111
references.pmid: 22529829
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3343-54
references.pmid: 21452952
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):499-529
references.pmid: 9697429
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5
references.pmid: 26162106
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15387-92
references.pmid: 11742078
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):306-13
references.pmid: 21270447
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):372-90
references.pmid: 17201594
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2006 Mar;71(3):303-11
references.pmid: 16054283
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2011 Feb;25(2):360-8
references.pmid: 21432678
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Jul;32(7):943-56
references.pmid: 16738027
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):105-18
references.pmid: 9008376
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Dec;38(12):1566-78
references.pmid: 22914991
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;17(12):1068-74
references.pmid: 17201789
references.citation: Emotion. 2009 Oct;9(5):659-65
references.pmid: 19803588
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):997-1003
references.pmid: 24219023