title: Spatial resolution in visual memory.
abstract: Representations in visual short-term memory are considered to contain relatively elaborated information on object structure. Conversely, representations in earlier stages of the visual hierarchy are thought to be dominated by a sensory-based, feed-forward buildup of information. In four experiments, we compared the spatial resolution of different object properties between two points in time along the processing hierarchy in visual short-term memory. Subjects were asked either to estimate the distance between objects or to estimate the size of one of the objects' features under two experimental conditions, of either a short or a long delay period between the presentation of the target stimulus and the probe. When different objects were referred to, similar spatial resolution was found for the two delay periods, suggesting that initial processing stages are sensitive to object-based properties. Conversely, superior resolution was found for the short, as compared with the long, delay when features were referred to. These findings suggest that initial representations in visual memory are hybrid in that they allow fine-grained resolution for object features alongside normal visual sensitivity to the segregation between objects. The findings are also discussed in reference to the distinction made in earlier studies between visual short-term memory and iconic memory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105, Israel.
authors.forename: Asaf
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ben-Shalom
authors.forename: Tzvi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ganel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001364:Awareness; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D004215:Distance Perception; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011601:Psychophysics; D012858:Size Perception; D013028:Space Perception; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):861-72
references.pmid: 15288903
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Dec 11;426(6967):664-7
references.pmid: 14668865
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37
references.pmid: 11164022
references.citation: Perception. 2000;29(3):273-86
references.pmid: 10889938
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):122-36
references.pmid: 9526087
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1980 Nov;88(3):785-820
references.pmid: 7003642
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50042
references.pmid: 23209639
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):791-808
references.pmid: 22905874
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Jan;43(2):149-64
references.pmid: 12536137
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):63-71
references.pmid: 23228938
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54
references.pmid: 16407167
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Dec;15(12):567-75
references.pmid: 22078929
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):254-61
references.pmid: 15260190
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Dec;30(5-6):481-99; discussion 499-548
references.pmid: 18366828
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):845-66
references.pmid: 8409862
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):29-55
references.pmid: 24203413
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Aug;12(3):343-60
references.pmid: 2943863
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1199-204
references.pmid: 11127838
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Nov;14(4):671-681
references.pmid: 2974875
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1998 Mar;35(2):135-99
references.pmid: 9570898
references.citation: Perception. 2010;39(9):1175-84
references.pmid: 21125946
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):751-4
references.pmid: 15085133
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2004;144:131-44
references.pmid: 14650845
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1699
references.pmid: 18301775
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):150-60
references.pmid: 16556564
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):1707-12
references.pmid: 18993076
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):738-51
references.pmid: 17848031
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1980 Mar;27(3):183-228
references.pmid: 6992093
references.citation: J Vis. 2012 Jul 26;12(7):
references.pmid: 22836656
references.citation: Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Sep;1(3):204-20
references.pmid: 24168336
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17
references.pmid: 6240521
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34
references.pmid: 16462737
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Sep;109(3):279-95
references.pmid: 6447189
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):92-114
references.pmid: 11248943
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8
references.pmid: 17614871
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Oct;103(4):603-49
references.pmid: 8888649