title: The impact of immediate verbal feedback on the improvement of swimming technique.
abstract: The present research attempts to ascertain the impact of immediate verbal feedback (IVF) on modifications of stroke length (SL). In all swimming styles, stroke length is considered an essential kinematic parameter of the swimming cycle. It is important for swimming mechanics and energetics. If SL shortens while the stroke rate (SR) remains unchanged or decreases, the temporal-spatial structure of swimming is considered erroneous. It results in a lower swimming velocity. Our research included 64 subjects, who were divided into two groups: the experimental - E (n=32) and the control - C (n=32) groups. A pretest and a post-test were conducted. The subjects swam the front crawl over the test distance of 25m at Vmax. Only the E group subjects were provided with IVF aiming to increase their SL. All tests were filmed by two cameras (50 samples•s-1). The kinematic parameters of the swimming cycle were analyzed using the SIMI Reality Motion Systems 2D software (SIMI Reality Motion Systems 2D GmbH, Germany). The movement analysis allowed to determine the average horizontal swimming velocity over 15 meters. The repeated measures analysis of variance ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey range test demonstrated statistically significant (p<0.05) differences between the two groups in terms of SL and swimming velocity. IVF brought about a 6.93% (Simi method) and a 5.09% (Hay method) increase in SL, as well as a 2.92% increase in swimming velocity.
authors.affiliation: University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland, Department of Swimming.
authors.forename: Krystyna
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Zatoń
authors.affiliation: University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Poland, Department of Swimming.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Szczepan
keywords: immediate verbal feedback; motor control; swimming technique; verbal information
references.citation: J Hum Kinet. 2013 Dec 31;39:203-11
references.pmid: 24511356
references.citation: Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1985;13:235-61
references.pmid: 3891368
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985 Dec;17(6):625-34
references.pmid: 4079732
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):185-211
references.pmid: 12120783
references.citation: Int J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;31(12):875-81
references.pmid: 21072734
references.citation: J Hum Kinet. 2012 May;32:97-107
references.pmid: 23486223
references.citation: Med Sci Sports. 1979 Fall;11(3):278-83
references.pmid: 522640
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Mar;93(5-6):519-23
references.pmid: 15605282
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Aug;85(1):167-77
references.pmid: 9293574
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2005 Jun;23(6):637-50
references.pmid: 16195012
references.citation: J Biomech. 1992 Mar;25(3):311-8
references.pmid: 1564064
references.citation: J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Mar 01;8(1):30-6
references.pmid: 24150553
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1956 Mar;63(2):81-97
references.pmid: 13310704
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2006 Feb;102(1):275-84
references.pmid: 16671629
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 1996 Dec;14(6):523-43
references.pmid: 8981291
references.citation: J Hum Kinet. 2012 Jun;33:15-23
references.pmid: 23486784
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 1971 Jun;3(2):111-49
references.pmid: 15155169
references.citation: J Hum Kinet. 2011 Sep;29:35-40
references.pmid: 23486761
references.citation: J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Mar 01;6(1):58-62
references.pmid: 24149225