title: Mathematical models for sleep-wake dynamics: comparison of the two-process model and a mutual inhibition neuronal model.
abstract: Sleep is essential for the maintenance of the brain and the body, yet many features of sleep are poorly understood and mathematical models are an important tool for probing proposed biological mechanisms. The most well-known mathematical model of sleep regulation, the two-process model, models the sleep-wake cycle by two oscillators: a circadian oscillator and a homeostatic oscillator. An alternative, more recent, model considers the mutual inhibition of sleep promoting neurons and the ascending arousal system regulated by homeostatic and circadian processes. Here we show there are fundamental similarities between these two models. The implications are illustrated with two important sleep-wake phenomena. Firstly, we show that in the two-process model, transitions between different numbers of daily sleep episodes can be classified as grazing bifurcations. This provides the theoretical underpinning for numerical results showing that the sleep patterns of many mammals can be explained by the mutual inhibition model. Secondly, we show that when sleep deprivation disrupts the sleep-wake cycle, ostensibly different measures of sleepiness in the two models are closely related. The demonstration of the mathematical similarities of the two models is valuable because not only does it allow some features of the two-process model to be interpreted physiologically but it also means that knowledge gained from study of the two-process model can be used to inform understanding of the behaviour of the mutual inhibition model. This is important because the mutual inhibition model and its extensions are increasingly being used as a tool to understand a diverse range of sleep-wake phenomena such as the design of optimal shift-patterns, yet the values it uses for parameters associated with the circadian and homeostatic processes are very different from those that have been experimentally measured in the context of the two-process model.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Anne C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Skeldon
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Derk-Jan
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Dijk
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Gianne
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Derks
mesh_terms: D002940:Circadian Rhythm / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012890:Sleep / Q000502:physiology*; D012892:Sleep Deprivation / Q000503:physiopathology; D014851:Wakefulness / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2011 Oct;26(5):441-53
references.pmid: 21921298
references.citation: Obes Rev. 2011 Feb;12(2):78-92
references.pmid: 20345429
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):051920
references.pmid: 19113168
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2008 Dec 21;255(4):413-23
references.pmid: 18805427
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 21;256(2):227-39
references.pmid: 18938181
references.citation: Front Biosci. 2003 May 01;8:s683-93
references.pmid: 12700054
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):1937-53
references.pmid: 20107121
references.citation: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1998 Apr;52(2):131-3
references.pmid: 9628111
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2009 Dec;24(6):523-35
references.pmid: 19926811
references.citation: Sleep. 2005 Nov;28(11):1446-54
references.pmid: 16335485
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Apr 15;21(8):2610-21
references.pmid: 11306614
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):270-9
references.pmid: 23998671
references.citation: J Math Biol. 2010 May;60(5):615-44
references.pmid: 19557415
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 19;110(12):E1132-41
references.pmid: 23440187
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1995 May;15(5 Pt 1):3526-38
references.pmid: 7751928
references.citation: J Math Biol. 1999 Jun;38(6):479-533
references.pmid: 10422266
references.citation: Hum Neurobiol. 1982;1(3):195-204
references.pmid: 7185792
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Mar 21;273(1):44-54
references.pmid: 21176782
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2010 Jun;25(3):217-27
references.pmid: 20484693
references.citation: Methods Inf Med. 1997 Dec;36(4-5):282-5
references.pmid: 9470379
references.citation: J Sleep Res. 2011 Jun;20(2):288-97
references.pmid: 21129054
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jun 24;6(6):e1000826
references.pmid: 20585613
references.citation: Nature. 1976 Jun 10;261(5560):459-67
references.pmid: 934280
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jun;97(6):3828-40
references.pmid: 17409167
references.citation: Math Biosci. 2014 Apr;250:54-68
references.pmid: 24530893
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2007 Apr;22(2):167-79
references.pmid: 17440218
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 1999 Dec;14(6):557-68
references.pmid: 10643753
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):2055-69
references.pmid: 16282204
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2010 May 21;264(2):407-19
references.pmid: 20176034
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 11;111(6):E682-91
references.pmid: 24449876
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Oct;24(5):731-43
references.pmid: 21112022
references.citation: Sleep. 2010 May;33(5):585-92
references.pmid: 20469800
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1984 Feb;246(2 Pt 2):R161-83
references.pmid: 6696142
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 2011 Jun;32(12):1484-92
references.pmid: 21300732
references.citation: J Sleep Res. 2014 Jun;23(3):240-52
references.pmid: 24750198
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 2000 Sep;62(3 Pt B):4057-66
references.pmid: 11088930