title: Fractal branching organizations of Ediacaran rangeomorph fronds reveal a lost Proterozoic body plan.
abstract: The branching morphology of Ediacaran rangeomorph fronds has no exact counterpart in other complex macroorganisms. As such, these fossils pose major questions as to growth patterns, functional morphology, modes of feeding, and adaptive optimality. Here, using parametric Lindenmayer systems, a formal model of rangeomorph morphologies reveals a fractal body plan characterized by self-similar, axial, apical, alternate branching. Consequent morphological reconstruction for 11 taxa demonstrates an adaptive radiation based on 3D space-filling strategies. The fractal body plan of rangeomorphs is shown to maximize surface area, consistent with diffusive nutrient uptake from the water column (osmotrophy). The enigmas of rangeomorph morphology, evolution, and extinction are resolved by the realization that they were adaptively optimized for unique ecological and geochemical conditions in the late Proterozoic. Changes in ocean conditions associated with the Cambrian explosion sealed their fate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom jfh41@cam.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Jennifer F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Hoyal Cuthill
authors.affiliation: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Conway Morris
mesh_terms: D000825:Animal Structures / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D000818:Animals; D005580:Fossils; D017709:Fractals; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D013997:Time Factors
keywords: paleobiology; paleontology
references.citation: Science. 2004 Aug 20;305(5687):1141-4
references.pmid: 15256615
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 25;106(34):14438-43
references.pmid: 19706530
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2014 Feb 3;24(3):305-9
references.pmid: 24462003
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 25;4:4180
references.pmid: 24566959
references.citation: Science. 2010 Apr 2;328(5974):53-4
references.pmid: 20360098
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jan;24(1):31-40
references.pmid: 18952316
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jan 4;319(5859):81-4
references.pmid: 18174439
references.citation: Geobiology. 2011 Jan;9(1):24-33
references.pmid: 21044251
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2003 Feb;43(1):114-26
references.pmid: 21680416
references.citation: Astrobiology. 2005 Jun;5(3):415-38
references.pmid: 15941384
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2001 Sep;118(3):267-76
references.pmid: 11524457
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2010 May;61(8):2117-29
references.pmid: 20388746
references.citation: Geobiology. 2009 Jan;7(1):1-7
references.pmid: 19200141
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
references.pmid: 22930834
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 1968 Mar;18(3):280-99
references.pmid: 5659071