title: Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics.
abstract: The nature of the links between speech production and perception has been the subject of longstanding debate. The present study investigated the articulatory parameter of tongue height and the acoustic F1-F0 difference for the phonological distinction of vowel height in American English front vowels. Multiple repetitions of /i, ɪ, e, ε, æ/ in [(h)Vd] sequences were recorded in seven adult speakers. Articulatory (ultrasound) and acoustic data were collected simultaneously to provide a direct comparison of variability in vowel production in both domains. Results showed idiosyncratic patterns of articulation for contrasting the three front vowel pairs /i-ɪ/, /e-ε/ and /ε-æ/ across subjects, with the degree of variability in vowel articulation comparable to that observed in the acoustics for all seven participants. However, contrary to what was expected, some speakers showed reversals for tongue height for /ɪ/-/e/ that was also reflected in acoustics with F1 higher for /ɪ/ than for /e/. The data suggest the phonological distinction of height is conveyed via speaker-specific articulatory-acoustic patterns that do not strictly match features descriptions. However, the acoustic signal is faithful to the articulatory configuration that generated it, carrying the crucial information for perceptual contrast.
authors.affiliation: Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven CT 06510, USA.
authors.forename: Aude
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Noiray
authors.affiliation: Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven CT 06510, USA.
authors.forename: Khalil
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Iskarous
authors.affiliation: Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven CT 06510, USA.
authors.forename: D H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Whalen
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Aug;94(2 Pt 1):701-14
references.pmid: 8370875
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1970 May;77(3):182-96
references.pmid: 5454132
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1661-76
references.pmid: 16240825
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 May;69(5):1465-75
references.pmid: 7240581
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Jun;48(3):543-53
references.pmid: 16197271
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jun;127(6):3717-28
references.pmid: 20550270
references.citation: J Phon. 2011 Oct;39(4):683-693
references.pmid: 22125350
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Aug;45(4):651-62
references.pmid: 12199396
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Nov;64(5):1358-68
references.pmid: 744836
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 29;336(1278):367-73
references.pmid: 1354376
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
references.pmid: 19565683
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jun;125(6):3936-49
references.pmid: 19507976
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Sep;74(3):695-705
references.pmid: 6630725
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111
references.pmid: 7759650
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Feb 15;16(4):1570-9
references.pmid: 8778306
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1963 Jun;6:111-28
references.pmid: 13984031
references.citation: Infancy. 2010 Nov 1;15(6):
references.pmid: 24358016
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Apr;79(4):1086-100
references.pmid: 3700864
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Nov;116(5):3099-107
references.pmid: 15603155
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 May;93(5):2948-61
references.pmid: 8315158
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Jan;67(1):253-61
references.pmid: 7354193
references.citation: J Phon. 2010 Apr 1;38(2):167-184
references.pmid: 21173864
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Oct;50(4):1166-79
references.pmid: 5117649
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jul;106(1):381-93
references.pmid: 10420629
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 May;85(5):2114-34
references.pmid: 2659639
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2002 Jun;34(2):99-125
references.pmid: 12057885