title: Investigating the organisational impacts of quality improvement: a protocol for a realist evaluation of improvement approaches drawing on the Resource Based View of the Firm.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Little is understood about the role of quality improvement in enabling health organisations to survive and thrive in the contemporary context of financial and economic challenges. We will draw on the theoretical foundations of the 'Resource Based View of the Firm' (RBV) to develop insights into why health organisations engage in improvement work, how impacts are conceptualised, and 'what works' in delivering these impacts. Specifically, RBV theorises that the mix and use of resources across different organisations may explain differences in performance. Whether improvement work influences these resources is unclear.
  
  
  METHODS
  Case study research will be conducted across health organisations participating in four approaches to improvement, including: a national improvement programme; a multiorganisational partnership around implementation; an organisational strategy for quality improvement; and a coproduction project designed to enhance the experience of a clinical service from the perspective of patients. Data will comprise in-depth interviews with key informants, observation of key events and documents; analysed within and then across cases. Adopting a realist perspective, the core tenets of RBV will be evaluated as a programme theory, focusing on the interplay between organisational conditions and behavioural or resource responses that are reported through engagement in improvement.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The study has been approved by Bangor University Ethics Committee. The investigation will not judge the relative merits of different approaches to healthcare quality improvement. Rather, we will develop unique insights into the organisational consequences, and dependencies of quality improvement, providing an opportunity to add to the explanatory potential of RBV in this and other contexts. In addition to scientific and lay reports of the study findings, research outputs will include a framework for constructing the economic impacts of quality improvement and practical guidance for health service managers that maximises the impacts of investment in quality improvement.
authors.affiliation: School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
authors.forename: Christopher R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Burton
authors.affiliation: School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
authors.forename: Jo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rycroft Malone
authors.affiliation: King's College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Glenn
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Robert
authors.affiliation: Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK.
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Willson
authors.affiliation: Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, UK.
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hopkins
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration
keywords: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2009 Jan 05;4:1
references.pmid: 19123945
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 20;14:24
references.pmid: 24438592
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
references.pmid: 16204405
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(1):81-90
references.pmid: 15186471
references.citation: Health Econ. 2012 Jan;21(1):33-40
references.pmid: 22147627
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):1023-9
references.pmid: 20439901
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Oct;18(3 Suppl):13-26
references.pmid: 24127357
references.citation: Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Sep;7(3):121-2
references.pmid: 20840081
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
references.pmid: 17872937
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
references.pmid: 21513547
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):463-9
references.pmid: 22879374
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):307-10
references.pmid: 17074863
references.citation: Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 19;6:74
references.pmid: 21771329
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38
references.pmid: 22109631
references.citation: Evid Based Nurs. 2013 Oct;16(4):97
references.pmid: 23939760
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):445-52
references.pmid: 24840165
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD005470
references.pmid: 20238340