title: Banff Initiative for Quality Assurance in Transplantation (BIFQUIT): reproducibility of polyomavirus immunohistochemistry in kidney allografts.
abstract: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the gold standard for diagnosing (positive vs. negative) polyomavirus BK (BKV) nephropathy and has the potential for disease staging based on staining intensity and quantification of infected cells. This multicenter trial evaluated the reproducibility of BKV IHC among 81 pathologists at 60 institutions. Participants stained tissue microarray slides and scored them for staining intensity and percentage of positive nuclei. Staining protocol details and evaluation scores were collected online. Slides were returned for centralized panel re-evaluation and kappa statistics were calculated. Individual assessment of staining intensity and percentage was more reproducible than combined scoring. Inter-institutional reproducibility was moderate for staining intensity (κ = 0.49) and percentage (κ = 0.42), fair for combined (κ = 0.25) and best for simple positive/negative scoring (κ = 0.78). Inter-observer reproducibility was substantial for intensity (κ = 0.74), percentage (κ = 0.66), positive/negative (κ = 0.78) and moderate for combined scoring (κ = 0.43). Inter-laboratory reproducibility was fair for intensity (κ = 0.37), percentage (κ = 0.40) and combined (κ = 0.24), but substantial for positive/negative scoring (κ = 0.67). BKV RNA copies/cell correlated with staining intensity (r = 0.56) and percentage (r = 0.62). These results indicate that BKV IHC is reproducible between observers but scoring should be simplified to a single-feature schema. Standardization of tissue processing and staining protocols would further improve inter-laboratory reproducibility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Adam
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Randhawa
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zeng
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Regele
authors.forename: Y B
authors.initials: YB
authors.lastname: Kushner
authors.forename: R B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Colvin
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Reeve
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mengel
mesh_terms: D000416:Alberta; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D016030:Kidney Transplantation; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D011120:Polyomavirus / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous
keywords: Clinical research/practice; infection and infectious agents; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney disease: infectious; pathology/histopathology; viral: BK/JC/polyoma
references.citation: Kidney Int. 2003 Aug;64(2):665-73
references.pmid: 12846764
references.citation: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011 Jul;19(4):289-90
references.pmid: 21654365
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2012 Apr;12(4):907-18
references.pmid: 22390378
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2012 Mar;12(3):563-70
references.pmid: 22300494
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2007 Oct;7(10):2221-6
references.pmid: 17848174
references.citation: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2007 Jun;15(2):124-33
references.pmid: 17525622
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2006 May;6(5 Pt 1):1025-32
references.pmid: 16611340
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Mar;133(3):354-65
references.pmid: 20154273
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2010 Mar;10(3):464-71
references.pmid: 20121738
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2013 May;13(5):1235-45
references.pmid: 23464533
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2004 Dec;4(12):2082-92
references.pmid: 15575913
references.citation: Kidney Int. 2006 Feb;69(4):655-62
references.pmid: 16395271
references.citation: Hum Pathol. 2011 Dec;42(12):2018-24
references.pmid: 21733554
references.citation: J Pathol. 2002 Nov;198(3):292-9
references.pmid: 12375261
references.citation: Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 Nov;118(5):675-82
references.pmid: 12428786
references.citation: Virchows Arch. 2008 Dec;453(6):537-43
references.pmid: 18958494
references.citation: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2003 Sep;11(3):261-8
references.pmid: 12966354
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2009 Dec;9 Suppl 4:S136-46
references.pmid: 20070673
references.citation: Breast J. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):34-40
references.pmid: 15647076
references.citation: Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
references.pmid: 843571
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2014 Feb;14(2):272-83
references.pmid: 24472190
references.citation: Am J Surg Pathol. 2003 Jun;27(6):805-10
references.pmid: 12766585
references.citation: Am J Transplant. 2005 Mar;5(3):582-94
references.pmid: 15707414