title: Tailoring dietary approaches for weight loss.
abstract: Although the 'Low-Fat' diet was the predominant public health recommendation for weight loss and weight control for the past several decades, the obesity epidemic continued to grow during this time period. An alternative 'low-carbohydrate' (Low-Carb) approach, although originally dismissed and even vilified, was comparatively tested in a series of studies over the past decade, and has been found in general to be as effective, if not more, as the Low-Fat approach for weight loss and for several related metabolic health measures. From a glass half full perspective, this suggests that there is more than one choice for a dietary approach to lose weight, and that Low-Fat and Low-Carb diets may be equally effective. From a glass half empty perspective, the average amount of weight lost on either of these two dietary approaches under the conditions studied, particularly when followed beyond 1 year, has been modest at best and negligible at worst, suggesting that the two approaches may be equally ineffective. One could resign themselves at this point to focusing on calories and energy intake restriction, regardless of macronutrient distributions. However, before throwing out the half-glass of water, it is worthwhile to consider that focusing on average results may mask important subgroup successes and failures. In all weight-loss studies, without exception, the range of individual differences in weight change within any particular diet groups is orders of magnitude greater than the average group differences between diet groups. Several studies have now reported that adults with greater insulin resistance are more successful with weight loss on a lower-carbohydrate diet compared with a lower-fat diet, whereas adults with greater insulin sensitivity are equally or more successful with weight loss on a lower-fat diet compared with a lower-carbohydrate diet. Other preliminary findings suggest that there may be some promise with matching individuals with certain genotypes to one type of diet over another for increasing weight-loss success. Future research to address the macronutrient intake component of the obesity epidemic should build on these recent insights and be directed toward effectively classifying individuals who can be differentially matched to alternate types of weight-loss diets that maximize weight-loss and weight-control success.
authors.affiliation: Division of Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: C D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Gardner
keywords: gene–diet interaction; high protein; insulin resistance; low-carbohydrate; low-fat; weight-loss diets
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2004 Oct 25;164(19):2141-6
references.pmid: 15505128
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jul;82(1):41-8
references.pmid: 16002798
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2010 Nov;42(11):937-48
references.pmid: 20935630
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Apr;88(4):1617-23
references.pmid: 12679447
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Jul;78(1):31-9
references.pmid: 12816768
references.citation: Circulation. 2011 Aug 2;124(5):563-71
references.pmid: 21747052
references.citation: Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11):1011-20
references.pmid: 19704096
references.citation: Diabetologia. 2005 Jan;48(1):8-16
references.pmid: 15616799
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):802-9
references.pmid: 14623617
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Jun;81(6):1298-306
references.pmid: 15941879
references.citation: Obes Res. 2001 Mar;9 Suppl 1:1S-40S
references.pmid: 11374180
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2004 May 18;140(10):778-85
references.pmid: 15148064
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 May 16;297(19):2092-102
references.pmid: 17507345
references.citation: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Dec;24(12):1545-52
references.pmid: 11126204
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2074-81
references.pmid: 12761364
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 17;359(3):229-41
references.pmid: 18635428
references.citation: J Nutr. 2005 Aug;135(8):1903-10
references.pmid: 16046715
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2004 May 18;140(10):769-77
references.pmid: 15148063
references.citation: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Oct;28(10):1283-90
references.pmid: 15303109
references.citation: Obes Res. 2005 Apr;13(4):703-9
references.pmid: 15897479
references.citation: Nutr Rev. 2006 Oct;64(10 Pt 1):435-48
references.pmid: 17063925
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2007 Apr;62(3):220-33
references.pmid: 17469900
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2102-13
references.pmid: 21105792
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Mar;85(3):724-34
references.pmid: 17344493
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2005 Dec;28(12):2939-41
references.pmid: 16306558
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Jan 5;293(1):43-53
references.pmid: 15632335
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2082-90
references.pmid: 12761365
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):969-77
references.pmid: 17341711
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 Apr 9;289(14):1837-50
references.pmid: 12684364
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Apr;81(4):762-72
references.pmid: 15817850
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 26;360(9):859-73
references.pmid: 19246357
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 25;170(2):136-45
references.pmid: 20101008
references.citation: Obes Res. 1998 Sep;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S
references.pmid: 9813653
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Jun 3;332(7553):1309-14
references.pmid: 16720619