title: Dynamic remodeling of microbial biofilms by functionally distinct exopolysaccharides.
abstract: Biofilms are densely populated communities of microbial cells protected and held together by a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances. The structure and rheological properties of the matrix at the microscale influence the retention and transport of molecules and cells in the biofilm, thereby dictating population and community behavior. Despite its importance, quantitative descriptions of the matrix microstructure and microrheology are limited. Here, particle-tracking microrheology in combination with genetic approaches was used to spatially and temporally study the rheological contributions of the major exopolysaccharides Pel and Psl in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Psl increased the elasticity and effective cross-linking within the matrix, which strengthened its scaffold and appeared to facilitate the formation of microcolonies. Conversely, Pel reduced effective cross-linking within the matrix. Without Psl, the matrix becomes more viscous, which facilitates biofilm spreading. The wild-type biofilm decreased in effective cross-linking over time, which would be advantageous for the spreading and colonization of new surfaces. This suggests that there are regulatory mechanisms to control production of the exopolysaccharides that serve to remodel the matrix of developing biofilms. The exopolysaccharides were also found to have profound effects on the spatial organization and integration of P. aeruginosa in a mixed-species biofilm model of P. aeruginosa-Staphylococcus aureus. Pel was required for close association of the two species in mixed-species microcolonies. In contrast, Psl was important for P. aeruginosa to form single-species biofilms on top of S. aureus biofilms. Our results demonstrate that Pel and Psl have distinct physical properties and functional roles during biofilm formation. Importance: Most bacteria grow as biofilms in the environment or in association with eukaryotic hosts. Removal of biofilms that form on surfaces is a challenge in clinical and industrial settings. One of the defining features of a biofilm is its extracellular matrix. The matrix has a heterogeneous structure and is formed from a secretion of various biopolymers, including proteins, extracellular DNA, and polysaccharides. It is generally known to interact with biofilm cells, thus affecting cell physiology and cell-cell communication. Despite the fact that the matrix may comprise up to 90% of the biofilm dry weight, how the matrix properties affect biofilm structure, maturation, and interspecies interactions remain largely unexplored. This study reveals that bacteria can use specific extracellular polymers to modulate the physical properties of their microenvironment. This in turn impacts biofilm structure, differentiation, and interspecies interactions.
authors.forename: Su Chuen
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Chew
authors.affiliation: BioSystems and Micromechanics IRG, Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Binu
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kundukad
authors.affiliation: Singapore Centre on Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Seviour
authors.forename: Johan R C
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: van der Maarel
authors.forename: Liang
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Scott A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Rice
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Doyle
authors.affiliation: LASKJELLEBERG@ntu.edu.sg.
authors.forename: Staffan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kjelleberg
mesh_terms: D018441:Biofilms / Q000254:growth & development*; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000378:metabolism; D011135:Polysaccharides, Bacterial / Q000378:metabolism*; D011550:Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D013211:Staphylococcus aureus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D011135:Polysaccharides, Bacterial
references.citation: Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2011 May;Chapter 1:Unit 1B.2
references.pmid: 21538301
references.citation: Carbohydr Res. 2003 Apr 22;338(9):903-22
references.pmid: 12681914
references.citation: Soft Matter. 2013 Apr 14;9(14):3871-3876
references.pmid: 23894249
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2004 Feb;51(3):675-90
references.pmid: 14731271
references.citation: Infect Immun. 1991 Jan;59(1):302-8
references.pmid: 1898898
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2003 Oct;50(1):61-8
references.pmid: 14507363
references.citation: Biomacromolecules. 2012 Jun 11;13(6):1965-72
references.pmid: 22587230
references.citation: Langmuir. 2008 Dec 2;24(23):13549-55
references.pmid: 18980352
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2013 Aug;15(8):2238-53
references.pmid: 23425591
references.citation: Nature. 2013 May 16;497(7449):388-391
references.pmid: 23657259
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49:711-45
references.pmid: 8561477
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2008 Jan;154(Pt 1):103-113
references.pmid: 18174130
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7907-12
references.pmid: 12810959
references.citation: Biophys J. 2005 Jan;88(1):623-38
references.pmid: 15533928
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Jan;176(2):269-75
references.pmid: 8288518
references.citation: ISME J. 2012 Feb;6(2):471-4
references.pmid: 21796216
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999 Oct 5;65(1):83-92
references.pmid: 10440674
references.citation: Biophys J. 2010 Sep 22;99(6):1906-15
references.pmid: 20858436
references.citation: Wound Repair Regen. 2011 Jan-Feb;19(1):80-8
references.pmid: 20946140
references.citation: Rep Prog Phys. 2016 Jul;79(7):074601
references.pmid: 27245584
references.citation: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2011 Aug;62(3):339-47
references.pmid: 21595754
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 12;110(11):4345-50
references.pmid: 23401501
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(14):4457-65
references.pmid: 15231777
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Feb;2(2):95-108
references.pmid: 15040259
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000354
references.pmid: 19325879
references.citation: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Jul;65(2):366-76
references.pmid: 22309122
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Sep;8(9):623-33
references.pmid: 20676145
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jul;13(7):1705-17
references.pmid: 21605307
references.citation: Water Res. 2009 Oct;43(18):4469-78
references.pmid: 19682721
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(15):4966-74
references.pmid: 17557861
references.citation: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;21(8):510-5
references.pmid: 10968716
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Jul;189(14):5383-6
references.pmid: 17496081
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 24;109(4):1116-21
references.pmid: 22232655
references.citation: FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010 Aug;59(3):253-68
references.pmid: 20497222
references.citation: Biophys J. 2012 Sep 19;103(6):1400-8
references.pmid: 22995513
references.citation: Thorax. 1992 Jan;47(1):6-13
references.pmid: 1539148
references.citation: Water Sci Technol. 2001;43(6):49-57
references.pmid: 11381972
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2012 Aug;14(8):1913-28
references.pmid: 22176658
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2006 Feb;59(4):1114-28
references.pmid: 16430688
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2001 Jul;45(3):187-95
references.pmid: 11348676
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2011 Jan 27;7(1):e1001264
references.pmid: 21298031
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Nov;189(22):7945-7
references.pmid: 17675377