title: In vitro transcription accurately predicts lac repressor phenotype in vivo in Escherichia coli.
abstract: A multitude of studies have looked at the in vivo and in vitro behavior of the lac repressor binding to DNA and effector molecules in order to study transcriptional repression, however these studies are not always reconcilable. Here we use in vitro transcription to directly mimic the in vivo system in order to build a self consistent set of experiments to directly compare in vivo and in vitro genetic repression. A thermodynamic model of the lac repressor binding to operator DNA and effector is used to link DNA occupancy to either normalized in vitro mRNA product or normalized in vivo fluorescence of a regulated gene, YFP. An accurate measurement of repressor, DNA and effector concentrations were made both in vivo and in vitro allowing for direct modeling of the entire thermodynamic equilibrium. In vivo repression profiles are accurately predicted from the given in vitro parameters when molecular crowding is considered. Interestingly, our measured repressor-operator DNA affinity differs significantly from previous in vitro measurements. The literature values are unable to replicate in vivo binding data. We therefore conclude that the repressor-DNA affinity is much weaker than previously thought. This finding would suggest that in vitro techniques that are specifically designed to mimic the in vivo process may be necessary to replicate the native system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
authors.forename: Matthew Almond
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Sochor
keywords: Allostery; Gene regulation; In vitro; In vitro transcription; In vivo; Lac repressor; MWC; Protein-DNA binding
references.citation: Biophys Chem. 2011 Nov;159(1):66-72
references.pmid: 21624765
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1990 May 22;29(20):4959-66
references.pmid: 2194564
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2011 May 27;409(1):76-87
references.pmid: 21459098
references.citation: Protein Eng Des Sel. 2009 Nov;22(11):673-83
references.pmid: 19729374
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2003 Aug;49(3):731-43
references.pmid: 12864855
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2009 Oct 9;392(5):1133-44
references.pmid: 19631220
references.citation: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001 Feb;11(1):114-9
references.pmid: 11179900
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990 Sep 10;1087(1):55-60
references.pmid: 2205296
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;12(2):129-37
references.pmid: 19269243
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 29;269(17):12482-7
references.pmid: 8175655
references.citation: Biophys Chem. 2011 Nov;159(1):142-51
references.pmid: 21715082
references.citation: Cell. 2011 Aug 5;146(3):462-70
references.pmid: 21802129
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1992 Nov 5;228(1):252-64
references.pmid: 1447786
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1986 Dec;168(3):1466-7
references.pmid: 3536882
references.citation: C R Biol. 2005 Jun;328(6):521-48
references.pmid: 15950160
references.citation: EMBO J. 1994 Jul 15;13(14):3348-55
references.pmid: 8045263
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1965 May;12:88-118
references.pmid: 14343300