title: Cognitive control and unusual decisions about beauty: an fMRI study.
abstract: Studies of visual esthetic preference have shown that people without art training generally prefer representational paintings to abstract paintings. This, however, is not always the case: preferences can sometimes go against this usual tendency. We aimed to explore this issue, investigating the relationship between "unusual responses" and reaction time in an esthetic appreciation task. Results of a behavioral experiment confirmed the trend for laypeople to consider as beautiful mostly representational stimuli and as not beautiful mostly abstract ones ("usual response"). Furthermore, when participants gave unusual responses, they needed longer time, especially when considering abstract stimuli as beautiful. We interpreted this longer time as greater involvement of cognitive mastering and evaluation processes during the unusual responses. Results of an fMRI experiment indicated that the anterior cingulate (ACC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and insula were the main structures involved in this effect. We discuss the possible role of these areas in an esthetic appreciation task.
authors.affiliation: Human Evolution and Cognition (EvoCog) Group, IFISC (UIB-CSIC), Psychology, Universitat de les Illes Balears Palma, Spain.
authors.forename: Albert
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Flexas
authors.affiliation: Human Evolution and Cognition (EvoCog) Group, IFISC (UIB-CSIC), Psychology, Universitat de les Illes Balears Palma, Spain.
authors.forename: Jaume
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rosselló
authors.affiliation: Clínica Rotger Palma, Spain.
authors.forename: Pedro
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: de Miguel
authors.affiliation: Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: Marcos
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nadal
authors.affiliation: Human Evolution and Cognition (EvoCog) Group, IFISC (UIB-CSIC), Psychology, Universitat de les Illes Balears Palma, Spain.
authors.forename: Enric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Munar
keywords: art; conflict monitoring; esthetic appreciation; functional magnetic resonance imaging; reaction time
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1125-32
references.pmid: 19010423
references.citation: Science. 2007 Nov 9;318(5852):987-90
references.pmid: 17962523
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10;106(10):3847-52
references.pmid: 19237562
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1239:33-42
references.pmid: 22145873
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T142-54
references.pmid: 17499161
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
references.pmid: 12880848
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Mar;130(3):241-50
references.pmid: 19217589
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 12;5:94
references.pmid: 21941475
references.citation: Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1118-21
references.pmid: 15718473
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 1;58(1):250-8
references.pmid: 21699987
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Aug;95(1):91-100
references.pmid: 12365279
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1969 Aug;8(1):74-81
references.pmid: 5804593
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):367-79
references.pmid: 18189010
references.citation: J Vis. 2010 Feb 22;10(2):18.1-14
references.pmid: 20462319
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 30;14(12):1581-9
references.pmid: 22037498
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14529-34
references.pmid: 9826734
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):135-43
references.pmid: 19254086
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):413-22
references.pmid: 18189014
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 05;5:185
references.pmid: 22287948
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec;85(6):1035-48
references.pmid: 14674812
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):256-9
references.pmid: 2296583
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1699-705
references.pmid: 15010496
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):276-85
references.pmid: 16087351
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2009 Jun;70(1):84-91
references.pmid: 19223099
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):893-7
references.pmid: 15073538
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Feb;10(2):141-52
references.pmid: 19153577
references.citation: JRSM Short Rep. 2010 Nov 15;1(6):52
references.pmid: 21234115
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 20;101(16):6321-5
references.pmid: 15079079
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38152
references.pmid: 22675517
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):215-222
references.pmid: 10827444
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(10):475-83
references.pmid: 11006464
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jun;2(6):417-24
references.pmid: 11389475
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2004 Nov;95(Pt 4):489-508
references.pmid: 15527534
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Jun;13(2):336-62
references.pmid: 15134764