title: Men, maternity and moral residue: negotiating the moral demands of the transition to first time fatherhood.
abstract: This article discusses men's transition to first time fatherhood, with a focus on the way they recognise various in-tension moral demands and negotiate an appropriate role for themselves. The findings are taken from a longitudinal study, drawing on elements of grounded theory, comprising a series of face-to-face and telephone interviews with 11 men over a 9-month period from the 12(th) week of pregnancy to 8 weeks after the birth. The analysis focuses on men's feelings and experience of exclusion and participation, and their response and reaction to that experience. The findings present two descriptive themes, 'on the inside looking in' and 'present but not participating', followed by third theme 'deference and support: a moral response' that exposes the dilemmatic nature of men's experience and explains the participants' apparent acceptance of being less involved. The discussion explores the concept of moral residue, arguing that while deference and support may be an appropriate role for fathers in the perinatal period it may also be a compromise that leads to feelings of uncertainty and frustration, which is a consequence of being in a genuinely dilemmatic situation.
authors.affiliation: Medicine, Ethics, Society and History, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ives
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005220:Fathers / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008016:Life Change Events; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009014:Morals; D012380:Role; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
keywords: antenatal; fatherhood; involvement; maternity; moral residue
references.citation: Midwifery. 1997 Sep;13(3):132-8
references.pmid: 9362853
references.citation: Bioethics. 2014 Jul;28(6):302-12
references.pmid: 23444909
references.citation: Midwifery. 1998 Mar;14(1):10-7
references.pmid: 9633372
references.citation: Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):848-53
references.pmid: 20956030
references.citation: Bioethics. 2010 Jun;24(5):256-65
references.pmid: 20500762
references.citation: J Nurse Midwifery. 1997 Jan-Feb;42(1):17-24
references.pmid: 9037931
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Jan;50(1):121-33
references.pmid: 22683095
references.citation: Bioethics. 2008 Feb;22(2):92-100
references.pmid: 18251769
references.citation: Midwifery. 2012 Aug;28(4):362-71
references.pmid: 21820778
references.citation: Birth. 2009 Dec;36(4):305-18
references.pmid: 20002423
references.citation: Bioethics. 2012 May;26(4):198-206
references.pmid: 21039690
references.citation: Nurs Inq. 2003 Mar;10(1):66-77
references.pmid: 12622806
references.citation: Community Pract. 2011 Jul;84(7):19-23
references.pmid: 21941706
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2002 Sep;39(6):563-70
references.pmid: 12207754
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2008 Sep;63(6):626-33
references.pmid: 18808584
references.citation: Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):588-94
references.pmid: 20673600
references.citation: J Clin Ethics. 2009 Winter;20(4):330-42
references.pmid: 20120853
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Sep;42(Pt 3):337-55
references.pmid: 14567841
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1990 Jan-Feb;39(1):11-6
references.pmid: 2294508
references.citation: Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):723-9
references.pmid: 23522667