title: On the importance of electrostatic interactions between cell penetrating peptides and membranes: a pathway toward tumor cell selectivity?
abstract: Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are small molecules of major interest due to their ability to efficiently transport cargos across cell membranes in a receptor- and energy-independent way and without being cytotoxic to cells. Since their discovery 20 years ago their potential interest in drug delivery and diagnosis became undeniable. CPPs are being used to deliver inside cells a large variety of cargos such as proteins, DNA, antibodies, imaging agents and nanoparticle drug carriers. Their cellular uptake mechanisms are still debated and may vary depending on their structure, nature and size of cargo they transport and type of cell line targeted. CPPs are generally rich in positively charged residues, thus they are prone to establish electrostatic interactions with anionic membrane components (sugars and lipids). Understanding the molecular basis of CPP membrane interaction and cellular uptake is crucial to improve their in vivo efficiency target-specificity. A great number of studies demonstrated the high potential of CPPs to translocate efficiently therapeutic cargos into cells and some peptides are even in clinical phase studies. Although these molecules seem perfect for a therapeutic or diagnosis purpose, they still possess a small but non negligible drawback: a complete lack of cell type specificity. Tumor cells have recently been shown to over-express certain glycosaminoglycans at the cell membrane surface and to possess a higher amount of anionic lipids in their outer leaflet than healthy cells. Such molecules confer the cell membrane an enhanced anionic character, property that could be used by CPPs to selectively target these cells. Moreover previous studies demonstrate the importance of electrostatic interactions between basic residues in the peptide, especially Arg, and the lipid headgroups and glycosaminoglycans in the cell membrane. Electrostatic interactions put at stake in this process might be one of the keys to resolve the puzzle of CPP cell type specificity.
authors.affiliation: CBMN-Univ Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Allée Geoffroy St Hilaire, 33600 Pessac, France. Electronic address: ml.jobin@cbmn.u-bordeaux.fr.
authors.forename: Marie-Lise
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Jobin
authors.affiliation: CBMN-Univ Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Allée Geoffroy St Hilaire, 33600 Pessac, France. Electronic address: i.alves@cbmn.u-bordeaux.fr.
authors.forename: Isabel D
authors.initials: ID
authors.lastname: Alves
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D001120:Arginine / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D002462:Cell Membrane / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D057846:Cell-Penetrating Peptides / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000473:pathology; D011485:Protein Binding; D055672:Static Electricity
chemical_list: D057846:Cell-Penetrating Peptides; D001120:Arginine
keywords: Cell penetrating peptides; Electrostatic interactions; Peptide/lipid interactions; Tumor cell specificity