title: A framework to integrate habitat monitoring and restoration with endangered insect recovery.
abstract: Monitoring is essential to track the long-term recovery of endangered species. Greater emphasis on habitat monitoring is especially important for taxa whose populations may be difficult to quantify (e.g., insects) or when true recovery (delisting) requires continuous species-specific habitat management. In this paper, we outline and implement a standardized framework to facilitate the integration of habitat monitoring with species recovery efforts. The framework has five parts: (1) identify appropriate sample units, (2) select measurable indicators of habitat requirements, (3) determine rating categories for these indicators, (4) design and implement appropriate data collection protocols, and (5) synthesize the ratings into an overall measure of habitat potential. Following these steps, we developed a set of recovery criteria to estimate habitat potential and initially assess restoration activities in the context of recovering an endangered insect, the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). We recommend basing the habitat potential grading scheme on recovery plan criteria, the latest information on species biology, and working hypotheses as needed. The habitat-based assessment framework helps to identify which recovery areas and habitat patches are worth investing in and what type of site-specific restoration work is needed. We propose that the transparency and decision-making process in endangered insect recovery efforts could be improved through adaptive management that explicitly identifies and tracks progress toward habitat objectives and ultimate population recovery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University, 501 Life Sciences West, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA, bried@okstate.edu.
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bried
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tear
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Shirer
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zimmerman
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gifford
authors.forename: Steve
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Kathy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: O'Brien
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002080:Butterflies; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem; D056727:Endangered Species; D009518:New York
references.citation: Science. 2005 Apr 29;308(5722):636-7
references.pmid: 15860611
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Dec;26(12):641-6
references.pmid: 21880394
references.citation: Science. 1993 Nov 12;262(5136):976-7
references.pmid: 17782035
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2011 Feb;47(2):161-72
references.pmid: 21161526
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1148-53
references.pmid: 20412087
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Apr;21(2):422-33
references.pmid: 17391192
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Apr;12(4):293-301
references.pmid: 19243409
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2012 Jun;49(6):1103-14
references.pmid: 22535183
references.citation: Oecologia. 1998 Apr;114(2):243-250
references.pmid: 28307938
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2013 Mar;51(3):786-800
references.pmid: 23322128
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1313-9
references.pmid: 23982737
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2013 Jun;27(3):480-5
references.pmid: 23565990