title: A dyadic analysis of relationships and health: does couple-level context condition partner effects?
abstract: Adding to the growing literature explicating the links between romantic relationships and health, this study examined how both couple-level characteristics, particularly union type (e.g., dating, cohabiting, or marriage) and interracial pairing, and interpersonal characteristics (e.g., partner strain and support), predicted young adults' physical and mental health. Using dyadic data from a sample of 249 young, primarily Black couples, we hypothesized and found support for the importance of couple-level context, partner behavior, and their interaction in predicting health. Interracial couples (all Black/non-Black pairings) reported worse health than monoracial Black couples. Union type, however, did not directly predict health but was a significant moderator of partner strain. That is, the negative association between partner strain and self-reported health was stronger for cohabiting and married couples versus their dating counterparts, suggesting that coresidence, more so than marital status, may be important for understanding partner effects on physical health. For psychological distress, however, partner support proved equally beneficial across union types.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology.
authors.forename: Ashley B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Barr
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, University of Georgia.
authors.forename: Ronald L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Simons
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D044383:Black People / Q000523:psychology*; D005191:Family Characteristics / Q000208:ethnology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D017533:Marital Status / Q000208:ethnology; D008393:Marriage / Q000208:ethnology; D008603:Mental Health / Q000208:ethnology; D012747:Sexual Partners / Q000523:psychology*; D012944:Social Support; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000523:psychology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2012 Apr;26(2):290-5
references.pmid: 22229879
references.citation: Demography. 2011 May;48(2):481-506
references.pmid: 21526396
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21-37
references.pmid: 9097506
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):928-32
references.pmid: 19549083
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2010 Jun;51(2):168-82
references.pmid: 20617757
references.citation: J Adolesc. 2011 Aug;34(4):619-28
references.pmid: 21044798
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):39-63
references.pmid: 1529039
references.citation: J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18
references.pmid: 22611285
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Sep;35(1):33-8
references.pmid: 19751761
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):826-33
references.pmid: 16380565
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2003 Aug;79(3):409-16
references.pmid: 12954435
references.citation: Sociol Q. 2011;52(3):400-20
references.pmid: 22081799
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):373-8
references.pmid: 23359109
references.citation: J Marriage Fam. 2013 Feb 1;75(1):127-141
references.pmid: 24700968
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2003 Jun;8(2):115-28
references.pmid: 12924810
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Nov;36(10):1495-504
references.pmid: 21601365
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):92-103
references.pmid: 20053034
references.citation: AJS. 2002 Jan;107(4):1065-96
references.pmid: 12227382
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Dec;24(6):791-4
references.pmid: 21171780
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2009 Feb;71(2):171-86
references.pmid: 19188531
references.citation: Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41
references.pmid: 28489526
references.citation: Ann Behav Med. 2008 Apr;35(2):239-44
references.pmid: 18347896
references.citation: J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):403-419
references.pmid: 22399825
references.citation: J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):367-70
references.pmid: 20545410
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51 Suppl:S28-40
references.pmid: 20943581
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2012 Sep;53(3):279-95
references.pmid: 22940811
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2006 Mar;47(1):1-16
references.pmid: 16583772
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2008 Sep;49(3):239-53
references.pmid: 18771061
references.citation: Adv Data. 2004 Dec 15;(351):1-32
references.pmid: 15633583
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2012 Mar;53(1):67-83
references.pmid: 22328171