title: The influence of vegetation height heterogeneity on forest and woodland bird species richness across the United States.
abstract: Avian diversity is under increasing pressures. It is thus critical to understand the ecological variables that contribute to large scale spatial distribution of avian species diversity. Traditionally, studies have relied primarily on two-dimensional habitat structure to model broad scale species richness. Vegetation vertical structure is increasingly used at local scales. However, the spatial arrangement of vegetation height has never been taken into consideration. Our goal was to examine the efficacies of three-dimensional forest structure, particularly the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation height in improving avian richness models across forested ecoregions in the U.S. We developed novel habitat metrics to characterize the spatial arrangement of vegetation height using the National Biomass and Carbon Dataset for the year 2000 (NBCD). The height-structured metrics were compared with other habitat metrics for statistical association with richness of three forest breeding bird guilds across Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) routes: a broadly grouped woodland guild, and two forest breeding guilds with preferences for forest edge and for interior forest. Parametric and non-parametric models were built to examine the improvement of predictability. Height-structured metrics had the strongest associations with species richness, yielding improved predictive ability for the woodland guild richness models (r(2) = ∼ 0.53 for the parametric models, 0.63 the non-parametric models) and the forest edge guild models (r(2) = ∼ 0.34 for the parametric models, 0.47 the non-parametric models). All but one of the linear models incorporating height-structured metrics showed significantly higher adjusted-r2 values than their counterparts without additional metrics. The interior forest guild richness showed a consistent low association with height-structured metrics. Our results suggest that height heterogeneity, beyond canopy height alone, supplements habitat characterization and richness models of forest bird species. The metrics and models derived in this study demonstrate practical examples of utilizing three-dimensional vegetation data for improved characterization of spatial patterns in species richness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Qiongyu
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.affiliation: Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Anu
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Swatantran
authors.affiliation: Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Ralph
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dubayah
authors.affiliation: Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, United States of America.
authors.forename: Scott J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Goetz
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001717:Birds / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D065928:Forests; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011157:Population Dynamics; D014197:Trees / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014481:United States
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Mar;163(3):E1-23
references.pmid: 15026983
references.citation: Am Nat. 1999 Feb;153(2):165-182
references.pmid: 29578760
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11365-70
references.pmid: 11553792
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Jun;91(6):1569-76
references.pmid: 20583698
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 14;108(24):9899-904
references.pmid: 21628575
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 Feb;80(1):1-25
references.pmid: 15727036
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 22;270(1521):1293-300
references.pmid: 12816643
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28922
references.pmid: 22235254
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4534-9
references.pmid: 11296292
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Aug;170 Suppl 2:S16-27
references.pmid: 17874382
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1974;7(0):1-318
references.pmid: 4835705
references.citation: Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):83-97
references.pmid: 12650464
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):220-7
references.pmid: 10821282
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2012 Oct;26(5):821-9
references.pmid: 22731630
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Oct;17(7):1989-2010
references.pmid: 17974337
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 23;95(13):7497-501
references.pmid: 9636178
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jan 22;274(1607):165-74
references.pmid: 17148246
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 May 7;274(1614):1189-97
references.pmid: 17311781