title: Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.
abstract: Motor behavior requires selecting between potential actions. The role of inhibition in response selection has frequently been examined in tasks in which participants are engaged in some advance preparation prior to the presentation of an imperative signal. Under such conditions, inhibition could be related to processes associated with response selection, or to more general inhibitory processes that are engaged in high states of anticipation. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the degree of anticipatory preparation. Participants performed a choice reaction time task that required choosing between a movement of the left or right index finger, and used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the left hand agonist. In high anticipation blocks, a non-informative cue (e.g., fixation marker) preceded the imperative; in low anticipation blocks, there was no cue and participants were required to divide their attention between two tasks to further reduce anticipation. MEPs were substantially reduced before the imperative signal in high anticipation blocks. In contrast, in low anticipation blocks, MEPs remained unchanged before the imperative signal but showed a marked suppression right after the onset of the imperative. This effect occurred regardless of whether the imperative had signalled a left or right hand response. After this initial inhibition, left MEPs increased when the left hand was selected and remained suppressed when the right hand was selected. We obtained similar results in Experiment 2 except that the persistent left MEP suppression when the left hand was not selected was attenuated when the alternative response involved a non-homologous effector (right foot). These results indicate that, even in the absence of an anticipatory period, inhibitory mechanisms are engaged during response selection, possibly to prevent the occurrence of premature and inappropriate responses during a competitive selection process.
authors.affiliation: Cognition and Actions Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Ave Mounier, 53, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: Julie.duque@uclouvain.be.
authors.forename: Julie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Duque
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
authors.forename: Ludovica
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Labruna
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cazares
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
authors.forename: Richard B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Ivry
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D059031:Anticipation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D011712:Pyramidal Tracts / Q000502:physiology*; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Action selection; Competition resolution; Impulse control; Inhibition; Motor preparation; Movement; Transcranial magnetic stimulation