title: Has the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental illnesses (fifth edition) jumped the shark and is it now time for Australia to reconsider reliance on it?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this article is to consider whether, in light of the significant controversy surrounding the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental illnesses (fifth edition) (DSM-5), it may be time for Australia to reconsider the influence of, and its past reliance on, the DSM. Also considered is whether it is now time, with the imminent publication of the The international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (eleventh edition) (ICD-11), to move to the ICD-11 as the primary instrument for diagnosis and research in Australia.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  That DSM-5 begins its life in an unprecedented plethora of criticism, not only from lay people but also from mental health professionals, which should sound a note of caution for continued reliance on it in Australia.
authors.affiliation: Board Member, Guardianship Board of South Australia; Member, South Australian Health Practitioners Tribunal, Prospect, SA, Australia peter.gaughwin@live.com.au.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gaughwin
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D006801:Humans; D038801:International Classification of Diseases; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis
keywords: DSM-5; ICD-11; criticism; influence