title: Fatness, medicalization, and stigma: on the need to do better.
abstract: This article comments on a collection of remarkable narratives authored by fat writers addressing the American Medical Association's decision to label obesity a disease. Endeavoring to avoid what has been termed "thinsplaining," the commentary examines the voices of the writers in the hopes of identifying key themes and points that emerge from these fat narratives. The commentary canvasses the writers' perspectives on topics such as the medicalization and pathologization of fat, the Western and especially American tendency to emphasize individual culpability for fatness, and, of course, the horrific commonality and intensity of fat stigma. Stigma is a particular focus for the commentary, both because it is a principal theme in the collection, and also because it is important to understand precisely what stigma is and its deep connections to larger macrosocial structures. The commentary concludes with a simple admonition, gleaned from the narratives: we should strive to do better.
authors.forename: Daniel S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Goldberg
mesh_terms: D000574:American Medical Association; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D015992:Body Mass Index; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D062528:Medicalization / Q000592:standards*; D033262:Narration; D020380:Needs Assessment; D009765:Obesity / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D057545:Social Stigma; D013240:Stereotyping; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D014481:United States