title: Carotid artery stenting.
abstract: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has achieved clinical equipoise with carotid endarterectomy (CEA), as evidenced by 2 large U.S. randomized clinical trials, multiple pivotal registry trials, and 2 multispecialty guideline documents endorsed by 14 professional societies. The largest randomized trial conducted in patients at average surgical risk of CEA, CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial) found no difference between CAS and CEA for the combined endpoint of stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI) after 4 years of follow-up. The largest randomized trial comparing CAS and CEA in patients at increased surgical risk, SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy), looked at 1-year stroke, death, and MI incidence and found no difference in symptomatic patients, but a significantly better outcome in asymptomatic patients for CAS (9.9% vs. 21.5%; p = 0.02). Given that >70% of carotid revascularization procedures are performed in asymptomatic patients for primary prevention of stroke, it is incumbent upon clinicians to demonstrate that revascularization has an incremental benefit over highly effective modern medical therapy alone.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, John Ochsner Heart & Vascular Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana. Electronic address: cwhite@ochsner.org.
authors.forename: Christopher J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: White
mesh_terms: D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D015607:Stents; D020521:Stroke / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*
keywords: angioplasty; cerebral angiography; embolic protection; neurovascular; stroke prevention