title: Kidney retransplantation: removal or persistence of the previous failed allograft?
abstract: A significant percentage of patients with failed renal graft are candidates for retransplantation. The outcomes of retransplantation are poorer than those of primary transplantation and sensitization is documented to be a major reason. The management of a failed allograft that is not immediately symptomatic is still very controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the failed allograft nephrectomy on a subsequent transplantation and its importance in the sensitization. We performed a retrospective analysis of the local prospective transplantation registry of the outcome of 126 second kidney transplantations among 2438 transplantations performed in our unit between June 1980 and March 2013, comparing those who underwent allograft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation with those who retained the failed graft. Primary endpoints were graft and patient survival. The levels of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) and rate of acute rejections on retransplantation outcomes were also studied. Among the 126 patients who underwent a second renal transplantation, 76 (60.3%) had a prior graft nephrectomy (Group A), whereas 50 (39.7%) kept their failed graft (Group B). Group A showed significantly more positive PRA levels when compared with the other group (38% vs 10%; P < .001), as measured before the most recent transplantation, and a higher rate of acute rejection (19% vs 5.6%; P = .016). There were 28 (36%) renal allograft losses for Group A and 18 (36%) for those who had not had transplantectomy (P = not significant [NS]). One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 96.6%, 90.7%, and 83.4%, respectively, in Group A and 95%, 82%, and 68.4%, respectively, in Group B, with no statistical differences (P = .19). Five-year actuarial patient survival rates in the 2 groups was 89.3% and 82.8%, respectively (P = .55). Multivariate analysis showed that PRA level and delayed graft function (DGF) had a statistically significant influence on graft survival (P = .028; odds ratio [OR] = 1.029; and P = .024; OR = 8.6), irrespective of whether the patient had graft nephrectomy or not. The allosensitization indicated by PRA increases after transplantectomy and leads to a higher incidence of acute rejection after retransplantation. Nephrectomy of failed allograft does not seem to significantly influence the survival of a subsequent graft. The decision to remove or retain a failed graft in the context of retransplantation should thus be based on known clinical indications for the procedure.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: Pj.s.dinis@gmail.com.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dinis
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Nunes
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Marconi
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Furriel
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Parada
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Moreira
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Figueiredo
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bastos
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roseiro
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Dias
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rolo
authors.affiliation: Department of Nephrology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Macário
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mota
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D064591:Allografts; D051799:Delayed Graft Function; D005260:Female; D006084:Graft Rejection; D006085:Graft Survival; D006650:Histocompatibility Testing; D006801:Humans; D007518:Isoantibodies / Q000097:blood; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009392:Nephrectomy; D012042:Registries; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies
chemical_list: D007518:Isoantibodies