title: Cost analysis of the development and implementation of a spatial decision support system for malaria elimination in Solomon Islands.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The goal of malaria elimination faces numerous challenges. New tools are required to support the scale up of interventions and improve national malaria programme capacity to conduct detailed surveillance. This study investigates the cost factors influencing the development and implementation of a spatial decision support system (SDSS) for malaria elimination in the two elimination provinces of Isabel and Temotu, Solomon Islands.
  
  
  METHODS
  Financial and economic costs to develop and implement a SDSS were estimated using the Solomon Islands programme's financial records. Using an ingredients approach, verified by stakeholders and operational reports, total costs for each province were quantified. A budget impact sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the influence of variations in standard budgetary components on the costs and to identify potential cost savings.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total investment of US$ 96,046 (2012 constant dollars) was required to develop and implement the SDSS in two provinces (Temotu Province US$ 49,806 and Isabel Province US$ 46,240). The single largest expense category was for computerized equipment totalling approximately US$ 30,085. Geographical reconnaissance was the most expensive phase of development and implementation, accounting for approximately 62% of total costs. Sensitivity analysis identified different cost factors between the provinces. Reduced equipment costs would deliver a budget saving of approximately 10% in Isabel Province. Combined travel costs represented the greatest influence on the total budget in the more remote Temotu Province.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study provides the first cost analysis of an operational surveillance tool used specifically for malaria elimination in the South-West Pacific. It is demonstrated that the costs of such a decision support system are driven by specialized equipment and travel expenses. Such factors should be closely scrutinized in future programme budgets to ensure maximum efficiencies are gained and available resources are allocated effectively.
authors.forename: Luke
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Marston
authors.forename: Gerard C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.forename: Erick
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hale
authors.forename: Archie C A
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Clements
authors.affiliation: The University of Queensland, School of Population Health, Public Health Building, Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia. a.hodge@uq.edu.au.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hodge
authors.forename: Eliana
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Jimenez-Soto
mesh_terms: D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003660:Decision Support Systems, Management / Q000191:economics*; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D006801:Humans; D008288:Malaria / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008542:Melanesia / Q000453:epidemiology