title: Evaluation of high-fidelity simulation training in radiation oncology using an outcomes logic model.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the feasibility and educational value of high-fidelity, interprofessional team-based simulation in radiation oncology.
  
  
  METHODS
  The simulation event was conducted in a radiation oncology department during a non-clinical day. It involved 5 simulation scenarios that were run over three 105 minute timeslots in a single day. High-acuity, low-frequency clinical situations were selected and included HDR brachytherapy emergency, 4D CT artifact management, pediatric emergency clinical mark-up, electron scalp trial set-up and a cone beam CT misregistration incident. A purposive sample of a minimum of 20 trainees was required to assess recruitment feasibility. A faculty radiation oncologist (RO), medical physicist (MP) or radiation therapist (RTT), facilitated each case. Participants completed a pre event survey of demographic data and motivation for participation. A post event survey collected perceptions of familiarity with the clinical content, comfort with interprofessional practice, and event satisfaction, scored on a 1-10 scale in terms of clinical knowledge, clinical decision making, clinical skills, exposure to other trainees and interprofessional communication. Means and standard deviations were calculated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-one trainees participated including 6 ROs (29%), 6 MPs (29%), and 9 RTTs (43%). All 12 cases (100%) were completed within the allocated 105 minutes. Nine faculty facilitators, (3MP, 2 RO, 4 RTTs) were required for 405 minutes each. Additional costs associated with this event were 154 hours to build the high fidelity scenarios, 2 standardized patients (SPs) for a total of 15.5 hours, and consumables.The mean (±SD) educational value score reported by participants with respect to clinical knowledge was 8.9 (1.1), clinical decision making 8.9 (1.3), clinical skills 8.9 (1.1), exposure to other trainees 9.1 (2.3) and interprofessional communication 9.1 (1.0). Fifteen (71%) participants reported the cases were of an appropriate complexity. The importance of further simulation events was rated highly at 9.1/10.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  High-fidelity simulation training is feasible and effective in a radiation oncology context. However, such educational activities require significant resources, including personnel and equipment.
authors.affiliation: Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. meredith.giuliani@rmp.uhn.ca.
authors.forename: Meredith
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Giuliani
authors.forename: Caitlin
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gillan
authors.forename: Olive
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Harnett
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Milne
authors.forename: Doug
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Moseley
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Catton
authors.forename: Jean-Pierre
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Bissonnette
mesh_terms: D000488:Allied Health Personnel / Q000193:education*; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010820:Physicians; D018787:Radiation Oncology / Q000193:education*