title: EAU standardised medical terminology for urologic imaging: a taxonomic approach.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The terminology and abbreviations used in urologic imaging have generally been adopted on an ad hoc basis by different speciality groups; however, there is a need for shared nomenclature to facilitate clinical communication and collaborative research.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This work reviews the current nomenclature for urologic imaging used in clinical practice and proposes a taxonomy and terminology for urologic imaging studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  A list of terms used in urologic imaging were compiled from guidelines published by the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association and from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria.
  
  
  METHODS
  Terms searched were grouped into broad categories based on technology, and imaging terms were further stratified based on the anatomic extent, contrast or phases, technique or modifiers, and combinations or fusions. Terms that had a high degree of utilisation were classified as accepted.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We propose a new taxonomy to define a more useful and acceptable nomenclature model acceptable to all health professionals involved in urology. The major advantage of a taxonomic approach to the classification of urologic imaging studies is that it provides a flexible framework for classifying the modifications of current imaging modalities and allows the incorporation of new imaging modalities. The adoption of this hierarchical classification model ranging from the most general to the most detailed descriptions should facilitate hierarchical searches of the medical literature using both general and specific terms. This work is limited in its scope, as it is not currently all-inclusive. This will hopefully be addressed by future modification as others embrace the concept and work towards uniformity in nomenclature.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This paper provides a noncomprehensive list of the most widely used terms across different specialties. This list can be used as the basis for further discussion, development, and enhancement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this paper we describe a classification system for urologic imaging terms with the aim of aiding health professionals and ensuring that the terms used are more consistent.
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Urologie, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg, Lehrkrankenhaus der Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Flensburg, Germany. Electronic address: lochti@diako.de.
authors.forename: Tillmann
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Loch
authors.affiliation: St. James Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: Brendan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Carey
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Institute Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France.
authors.forename: Jochen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Walz
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, Dallas TX, USA.
authors.forename: Pat Fox
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Fulgham
mesh_terms: D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000145:classification* / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D014572:Urology / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards*
keywords: Computed tomography; EAU guidelines; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography; Radiographs; Taxonomy; Terminology; Ultrasound; Urologic imaging