title: Peer review in cardiothoracic radiology.
abstract: A variety of peer review methods can be used as part of quality assurance and quality improvement in cardiothoracic radiology. Traditionally, peer review in radiology is a retrospective process relying primarily on review of previously interpreted studies at the time of follow-up or additional imaging. However, peer review can be enhanced with other methods such as double reads, focused practice review, practice audit, and correlation with operative and pathologic findings. Furthermore, feedback from referring physicians can be extremely useful in improving the quality of a radiology practice. This article discusses peer review in radiology with a focus on cardiothoracic imaging. Types of peer review, advantages and shortcomings, and future challenges are addressed.
authors.affiliation: Associate Professor of Radiology, Chief of Thoracic Imaging, Vice Chair of Quality and Safety, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
authors.forename: Jeffrey P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Kanne
mesh_terms: D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards; D011871:Radiology / Q000592:standards*