title: Human and animal evidence supports lower occupational exposure limits for poorly-soluble respirable particles: Letter to the Editor re: 'Low-toxicity dusts: Current exposure guidelines are not sufficiently protective' by Cherrie, Brosseau, Hay and Donaldson.
authors.affiliation: 1.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Education and Information Division, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, USA; ekuempel@cdc.gov.
authors.forename: Eileen D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Kuempel
authors.affiliation: 2.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, Morgantown, WV, USA;
authors.forename: Michael D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Attfield
authors.affiliation: 3.University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Chicago, IL, USA;
authors.forename: Leslie T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Stayner
authors.affiliation: 4.National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division, Morgantown, WV, USA; 5.Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
authors.forename: Vincent
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Castranova
mesh_terms: D004391:Dust / Q000032:analysis*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D019570:Inhalation Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*
chemical_list: D004391:Dust