title: The Value of Ensari's Proposal in Evaluating the Mucosal Pathology of Childhood Celiac Disease: Old Classification versus New Version.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Small intestinal biopsy remains the gold standard in diagnosing celiac disease (CD); however, the wide spectrum of histopathological states and differential diagnosis of CD is still a diagnostic problem for pathologists. Recently, Ensari reviewed the literature and proposed an update of the histopathological diagnosis and classification for CD.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this study, the histopathological materials of 54 children in whom CD was diagnosed at our hospital were reviewed to compare the previous Marsh and Modified Marsh-Oberhuber classifications with this new proposal.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this study, we show that the Ensari classification is as accurate as the Marsh and Modified Marsh classifications in describing the consecutive states of mucosal damage seen in CD.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ensari's classification is simple, practical and facilitative in diagnosing and subtyping of mucosal pathology of CD.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
authors.forename: Servet
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Güreşci
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
authors.forename: Samil
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hızlı
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Keçiören Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
authors.forename: Gülçin Güler
authors.initials: GG
authors.lastname: Simşek
keywords: Celiac disease; Ensari classification; marsh classification; modified Marsh-Oberhuber classification