title: Polarization signaling in swordtails alters female mate preference.
abstract: Polarization of light, and visual sensitivity to it, is pervasive across aquatic and terrestrial environments. Documentation of invertebrate use of polarized light is widespread from navigation and foraging to species recognition. However, studies demonstrating that polarization body patterning serves as a communication signal (e.g., with evidence of changes in receiver behavior) are rare among invertebrate taxa and conspicuously absent among vertebrates. Here, we investigate polarization-mediated communication by northern swordtails, Xiphophorus nigrensis, using a custom-built videopolarimeter to measure polarization signals and an experimental paradigm that manipulates polarization signals without modifying their brightness or color. We conducted mate choice trials in an experimental tank that illuminates a pair of males with light passed through a polarization filter and a diffusion filter. By alternating the order of these filters between males, we presented females with live males that differed in polarization reflectance by >200% but with intensity and color differences below detection thresholds (∼5%). Combining videopolarimetry and polarization-manipulated mate choice trials, we found sexually dimorphic polarized reflectance and polarization-dependent female mate choice behavior with no polarization-dependent courtship behavior by males. Male swordtails exhibit greater within-body and body-to-background polarization contrast than females, and females preferentially associate with high-polarization-reflecting males. We also found limited support that males increase polarization contrast in social conditions over asocial conditions. Polarization cues in mate choice contexts may provide aquatic vertebrates with enhanced detection of specific display features (e.g., movements, angular information), as well as a signaling mechanism that may enhance detection by intended viewers while minimizing detection by others.
authors.affiliation: Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; and.
authors.forename: Gina M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Calabrese
authors.affiliation: Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; and.
authors.forename: Parrish C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Brady
authors.affiliation: Advanced Sensors Research Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63130.
authors.forename: Viktor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Gruev
authors.affiliation: Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712; and mcummings@austin.utexas.edu.
authors.forename: Molly E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Cummings
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D003532:Cyprinodontiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008027:Light; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D012919:Social Behavior
keywords: animal communication; dynamic signals; sensory ecology; sexual selection