title: Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations.
abstract: Globally, food-producing animals consume 70 to 90% of genetically engineered (GE) crop biomass. This review briefly summarizes the scientific literature on performance and health of animals consuming feed containing GE ingredients and composition of products derived from them. It also discusses the field experience of feeding GE feed sources to commercial livestock populations and summarizes the suppliers of GE and non-GE animal feed in global trade. Numerous experimental studies have consistently revealed that the performance and health of GE-fed animals are comparable with those fed isogenic non-GE crop lines. United States animal agriculture produces over 9 billion food-producing animals annually, and more than 95% of these animals consume feed containing GE ingredients. Data on livestock productivity and health were collated from publicly available sources from 1983, before the introduction of GE crops in 1996, and subsequently through 2011, a period with high levels of predominately GE animal feed. These field data sets, representing over 100 billion animals following the introduction of GE crops, did not reveal unfavorable or perturbed trends in livestock health and productivity. No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals. Because DNA and protein are normal components of the diet that are digested, there are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GE components in milk, meat, and eggs following consumption of GE feed. Globally, countries that are cultivating GE corn and soy are the major livestock feed exporters. Asynchronous regulatory approvals (i.e., cultivation approvals of GE varieties in exporting countries occurring before food and feed approvals in importing countries) have resulted in trade disruptions. This is likely to be increasingly problematic in the future as there are a large number of "second generation" GE crops with altered output traits for improved livestock feed in the developmental and regulatory pipelines. Additionally, advanced techniques to affect targeted genome modifications are emerging, and it is not clear whether these will be encompassed by the current GE process-based trigger for regulatory oversight. There is a pressing need for international harmonization of both regulatory frameworks for GE crops and governance of advanced breeding techniques to prevent widespread disruptions in international trade of livestock feedstuffs in the future.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616 alvaneenennaam@ucdavis.edu.
authors.forename: A L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Van Eenennaam
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616.
authors.forename: A E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Young
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D018744:DNA, Plant / Q000032:analysis / Q000235:genetics; D002523:Edible Grain / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics*; D004531:Eggs / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D005818:Genetic Engineering; D058751:Livestock / Q000502:physiology*; D008460:Meat / Q000032:analysis; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D015995:Prevalence
chemical_list: D018744:DNA, Plant
keywords: genetic engineering; genetically modified organisms; livestock feed; safety