title: Communication of radiation risk in nuclear medicine: Are we saying the right thing?
abstract: The radiation risk arising from nuclear medicine investigations represents a small but manageable risk to patients and it needs to be effectively communicated to them. Frequently in the culture of "doctor knows best," patients trust their doctors to do whatever is right and appropriate and leave it to them to worry about any attendant risks associated with any tests involving the use of radiation. The benefit to the patient of having a speedier diagnosis and a further guide to management may not be effectively communicated in a comprehensive, timely and professional manner. In this article, we address the issue of communication of radiation risk and benefits to patients and the basis for such information. While there are different ways of communicating radiation risk, we recognize that certain basic parameters are absolutely essential for patients to enable them to make an informed choice about undergoing a nuclear medicine investigation under the direction of a well-trained and qualified individual.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, City Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Manish
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pandit
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, England, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Sobhan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Vinjamuri
keywords: Radiation risk; communication of risk; risk benefit analysis