title: Peer review to ensure quality in forensic mental health publication.
abstract: Peer reviewers have been called the gatekeepers of science. For journal publications in forensic psychiatry, as well as other disciplines, the purposes of peer review are to assist in the selection of manuscripts to publish, improve the quality of manuscripts before their publication, and promote the fairness of the process. In this article, we examine, in particular, characteristics of high-quality peer reviewers, selection of peer reviewers, recruitment and retention of peer reviewers, desired quality of peer-reviewer ratings, and the value of peer review. We conclude with specific, albeit largely untested, recommendations for improvements in peer review of forensic mental health publications.
authors.affiliation: Dr. Felthous is Professor and Director, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, the Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr. Wettstein is Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. felthous@slu.edu.
authors.forename: Alan R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Felthous
authors.affiliation: Dr. Felthous is Professor and Director, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, the Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. Dr. Wettstein is Clinical Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Wettstein
mesh_terms: D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008374:Manuscripts, Medical as Topic; D010380:Peer Review / Q000592:standards*; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States