title: Prospective peer review quality assurance for outpatient radiation therapy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We implemented a peer review program that required presentation of all nonpalliative cases to a weekly peer review conference. The purpose of this review is to document compliance and determine how this program impacted care.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 2988 patients were eligible for peer review. Patient data were presented to a group of physicians, physicists, and dosimetrists, and the radiation therapy plan was reviewed. Details of changes made were documented within a quality assurance note dictated after discussion. Changes recommended by the peer review process were categorized as changes to radiation dose, target, or major changes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Breast cancer accounted for 47.9% of all cases, followed in frequency by head-and-neck (14.8%), gastrointestinal (9.9%), genitourinary (9.3%), and thoracic (6.7%) malignancies. Of the 2988 eligible patients, 158 (5.3%) were not presented for peer review. The number of missed presentations decreased over time; 2007, 8.2%; 2008, 5.7%; 2009, 3.8%; and 2010, 2.7% (P < .001). The reason for a missed presentation was unknown but varied by disease site and physician. Of the 2830 cases presented for peer review, a change was recommended in 346 cases (12.2%) and categorized as a dose change in 28.3%, a target change in 69.1%, and a major treatment change in 2.6%. When examined by year of treatment the number of changes recommended decreased over time: 2007, 16.5%; 2008, 11.5%; 2009, 12.5%; and 2010, 7.8% (P < .001). The number of changes recommended varied by disease site and physician. The head-and-neck, gynecologic, and gastrointestinal malignancies accounted for the majority of changes made.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compliance with this weekly program was satisfactory and improved over time. The program resulted in decreased treatment plan changes over time reflecting a move toward treatment consensus. We recommend that peer review be considered for patients receiving radiation therapy as it creates a culture where guideline adherence and discussion are part of normal practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: mballo@westclinic.com.
authors.forename: Matthew T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Ballo
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Gregory M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Chronowski
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Pamela J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Schlembach
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Elizabeth S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Bloom
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Isadora Y
authors.initials: IY
authors.lastname: Arzu
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Care Centers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
authors.forename: Deborah A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Kuban
mesh_terms: D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D010045:Outpatients; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal / Q000592:standards*