title: Qualitative inquiry and the debate between hermeneutics and critical theory.
abstract: Two issues have been central to ongoing disputes about judgments of quality in qualitative inquiry: (a) the ways in which paradigmatic orientations are understood to guide procedural decisions and (b) the meaning and intelligibility of paradigmatic incommensurability. In this article, we address these two key issues through an exploration of the debates between hermeneutics and critical social theory, including the exchanges between Hans-Georg Gadamer and Jurgen Habermas, and between Richard Rorty and Thomas McCarthy. We suggest that the key epistemological issue addressed in these debates is the nature of interpretation, separating the two philosophical camps based on beliefs about whether foundational knowledge is possible to achieve. We conclude the article by discussing the implications of these different positions for beliefs about quality in qualitative inquiry, and comment on the role of judgment in assessments of the value and quality of different approaches to qualitative research.
authors.affiliation: Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada james.shaw@uhn.ca.
authors.forename: James A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Shaw
authors.affiliation: St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Ryan T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: DeForge
mesh_terms: D066297:Hermeneutics; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design
keywords: critical methods; hermeneutics; interpretive methods; language / linguistics; research design; research evaluation; research, qualitative