title: National Lung Screening Trial findings by age: Medicare-eligible versus under-65 population.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) showed reduced lung cancer mortality in high-risk participants (smoking history of ≥30 pack-years) aged 55 to 74 years who were randomly assigned to screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus those assigned to chest radiography. An advisory panel recently expressed reservations about Medicare coverage of LDCT screening because of concerns about performance in the Medicare-aged population, which accounted for only 25% of the NLST participants.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the results of the NLST LDCT group by age (Medicare-eligible vs. <65 years).
  
  
  METHODS
  Secondary analysis of a group from a randomized trial (NCT00047385).
  
  
  METHODS
  33 U.S. screening centers.
  
  
  METHODS
  19 612 participants aged 55 to 64 years (under-65 cohort) and 7110 participants aged 65 to 74 years (65+ cohort) at randomization.
  
  
  METHODS
  3 annual rounds of LDCT screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  Demographics, smoking and medical history, screening examination adherence and results, diagnostic follow-up procedures and complications, lung cancer diagnoses, treatment, survival, and mortality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The aggregate false-positive rate was higher in the 65+ cohort than in the under-65 cohort (27.7% vs. 22.0%; P < 0.001). Invasive diagnostic procedures after false-positive screening results were modestly more frequent in the older cohort (3.3% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.039). Complications from invasive procedures were low in both groups (9.8% in the under-65 cohort vs. 8.5% in the 65+ cohort). Prevalence and positive predictive value (PPV) were higher in the 65+ cohort (PPV, 4.9% vs. 3.0%). Resection rates for screen-detected cancer were similar (75.6% in the under-65 cohort vs. 73.2% in the 65+ cohort). Five-year all-cause survival was lower in the 65+ cohort (55.1% vs. 64.1%; P = 0.018).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The oldest screened patient was aged 76 years.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  NLST participants aged 65 years or older had a higher rate of false-positive screening results than those younger than 65 years but a higher cancer prevalence and PPV. Screen-detected cancer was treated similarly in the groups.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  National Institutes of Health.
authors.forename: Paul F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Pinsky
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Gierada
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Hocking
authors.forename: Edward F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Patz
authors.forename: Barnett S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Kramer
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006801:Humans; D008168:Lung / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011013:Pneumonectomy; D012907:Smoking; D016019:Survival Analysis; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed