title: Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging in the detection of HCCs and allocation of transplant recipients on the basis of the Milan criteria and UNOS guidelines: correlation with histopathologic findings.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether hepatobiliary phase ( HBP hepatobiliary phase ) imaging can improve the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas ( HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s) and to investigate the accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in the allocation of transplant recipients on the basis of the Milan criteria and United Network for Organ Sharing ( UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing ) guidelines.
  
  
  METHODS
  This retrospective study had institutional review board approval; the requirement for informed consent was waived. Between June 2008 and June 2011, 63 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) were included. All patients underwent a gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0-T MR imaging examination of the liver that included HBP hepatobiliary phase images obtained 20 minutes after contrast material administration. Two abdominal radiologists independently assessed two MR imaging data sets to detect HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s: Set 1 included unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic images, and set 2 also included HBP hepatobiliary phase images. Patients were allocated into three groups: Those who did not meet the Milan criteria, those who did meet the Milan criteria with additional priority according to UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing guidelines, and those who did meet the Milan criteria without additional priority. Diagnostic performance of each data set in depicting HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s was compared by using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics ( JAFROC jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic s). Sensitivity and accuracy of patient allocation were compared by using generalized estimating equations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty-three HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s were found in 36 of 63 patients. Eight patients were classified as not meeting Milan criteria, 12 as meeting Milan criteria with additional priority, and 43 as meeting Milan criteria without additional priority. For the detection of HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s, reader-averaged figures of merit estimated with JAFROC jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic s were 0.761 for set 1 and 0.791 for set 2 (P < .001). Addition of HBP hepatobiliary phase images significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s, particularly 1-2-cm HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s (six [20.7%] vs 13 [44.8%] of 29 [P = .008] for reader 1 and eight [27.6%] vs 12 [41.4%] of 29 [P = .041] for reader 2). Accuracy of patient allocation was 88.9% for set 1 and 92.1% for set 2 (P = .151).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Addition of HBP hepatobiliary phase images can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging in the detection of 1-2-cm HCC hepatocellular carcinoma s in liver transplantation candidates. In addition, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging showed 92.1% accuracy in patient allocation on the basis of the Milan criteria and UNOS United Network for Organ Sharing guidelines.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Radiology (D.H.L., J.M.L., J.H.B., C.i.S., J.K.H., B.I.C.) and Institute of Radiation Medicine (J.M.L., J.K.H., B.I.C.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
authors.forename: Dong Ho
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Jeong Min
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Jee Hyun
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Baek
authors.forename: Cheong-Il
authors.initials: CI
authors.lastname: Shin
authors.forename: Joon Koo
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Byung Ihn
authors.initials: BI
authors.lastname: Choi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D006528:Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016031:Liver Transplantation; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D060787:Neoplasm Grading; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D066027:Transplant Recipients
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; C073590:gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA