title: Cerebral palsy litigation: change course or abandon ship.
abstract: The cardinal driver of cerebral palsy litigation is electronic fetal monitoring, which has continued unabated for 40 years. Electronic fetal monitoring, however, is based on 19th-century childbirth myths, a virtually nonexistent scientific foundation, and has a false positive rate exceeding 99%. It has not affected the incidence of cerebral palsy. Electronic fetal monitoring has, however, increased the cesarian section rate, with the expected increase in mortality and morbidity risks to mothers and babies alike. This article explains why electronic fetal monitoring remains endorsed as efficacious in the worlds' labor rooms and courtrooms despite being such a feeble medical modality. It also reviews the reasons professional organizations have failed to condemn the use of electronic fetal monitoring in courtrooms. The failures of tort reform, special cerebral palsy courts, and damage limits to stem the escalating litigation are discussed. Finally, the authors propose using a currently available evidence rule-the Daubert doctrine that excludes "junk science" from the courtroom-as the beginning of the end to cerebral palsy litigation and electronic fetal monitoring's 40-year masquerade as science.
authors.affiliation: Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, LLP, Houston, TX, USA.
authors.forename: Thomas P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Sartwelle
authors.affiliation: Legal Medicine Consultants, LLC, Seattle, WA, USA Johnston@GlobalNeurology.com.
authors.forename: James C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Johnston
mesh_terms: D015148:Cardiotocography; D002547:Cerebral Palsy / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000196:embryology*; D006801:Humans; D007883:Legislation, Medical
keywords: cerebral palsy; electronic fetal monitoring; medical malpractice