title: The Austrian health reform 2013 is promising but requires continuous political ambition.
abstract: The Austrian health system is much more complex and fragmented than in other OECD countries. In 2013 legislation was adopted to enhance efficiency through better balancing care provision across providers by promoting new primary care models and better coordination of care. Reform objectives should be achieved by cooperative and unified decision making across key stakeholders and by adherence to a budget cap that prescribes fiscal containment on the order of 3.4 billion Euros until 2016. This is priced into the envisaged savings of the current consolidation program. Efforts have been made to bridge the accountability divide by establishing agreements and administrative layers to govern the health system by objectives. Yet, more could have been achieved. For example, cross-stakeholder pooling of funds for better contracting governance and effective purchasing across care settings could have been introduced. This would have required addressing over capacity and fragmentation within social security. At the same time, legal provisions for cooperative governance between Sickness Funds and the governments on the regional level should have been stipulated. The Austrian 2013 reform is interesting to other countries as it aims to ensure better-balanced care at a sustainable path by employing a public management approach to governance relations across key payers of care.
authors.affiliation: Health System Intelligence, Josefstädter Strasse 14/60, 1018 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: maria.hofmarcher@healthsystemintelligence.eu.
authors.forename: Maria M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Hofmarcher
mesh_terms: D001317:Austria; D033161:Government Regulation; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration
keywords: Better governance; Fiscal stability; Health reform; Primary care