title: Love as a regulative ideal in surrogate decision making.
abstract: This discussion aims to give a normative theoretical basis for a "best judgment" model of surrogate decision making rooted in a regulative ideal of love. Currently, there are two basic models of surrogate decision making for incompetent patients: the "substituted judgment" model and the "best interests" model. The former draws on the value of autonomy and responds with respect; the latter draws on the value of welfare and responds with beneficence. It can be difficult to determine which of these two models is more appropriate for a given patient, and both approaches may seem inadequate for a surrogate who loves the patient. The proposed "best judgment" model effectively draws on the values incorporated in each of the traditional standards, but does so because these values are important to someone who loves a patient, since love responds to the patient as the specific person she is.
authors.affiliation: College of St. Benedict | St. John's University, St. Joseph and Collegeville, Minnesota, USA estonestreet@csbsju.edu.
authors.forename: Erica Lucast
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Stonestreet
mesh_terms: D016223:Advance Directives; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007600:Judgment / Q000941:ethics*; D008149:Love; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011340:Problem Solving / Q000941:ethics*; D019727:Proxy; D028722:Virtues
keywords: authenticity; identity; love; surrogate decision making