title: Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge.
abstract: Coccidiosis is an inherent risk in the commercial broiler industry and inflicts devastating economic losses to poultry operations. Probiotics may provide a potential alternative to the prophylactic use of anticoccidials in commercial production. This study evaluated the effects of probiotic applications (feed and water) on bird performance and resistance to a mixed Eimeria infection in commercial broilers. On day of hatch, 1,008 commercial male broilers (Cobb 500) were assigned to 1 of 6 treatments (8 replicate floor pens; 21 birds/pen), including noninfected negative control (NEG), Eimeria-infected positive control (POS), anticoccidial control (0.01% salinomycin, SAL), intermittent high-dose water-applied probiotic (WPI), continuous low-dose water-applied probiotic (WPC), and feed-supplemented probiotic (FSP). On d 15, all birds except those in NEG were challenged with a mixed inoculum of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima, and Eimeria tenella. Measurements were taken on d 7, 15, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Fecal samples were collected from d 20 to 24 for oocyst counts, and lesion scores were evaluated on d 21. Data were analyzed using the Fit Model platform in JMP Pro 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Differences in experimental treatments were tested using Tukey's honestly significant difference following ANOVA with significance reported at P ≤ 0.05. Overall, NEG birds outperformed all other groups. For performance, the probiotic groups were comparable with the SAL-treated birds, except during the 6 d immediately following the Eimeria species challenge, where the SAL birds exhibited better performance. The WPC birds had lower duodenal and jejunal lesion scores, indicating a healthier intestine and enhanced resistance to Eimeria species compared with POS. Birds in the WPI treatment shed fewer oocysts in the feces, although this was not a trend for all of the probiotic treatment groups. The results of this study suggest probiotic supplementation without anticoccidials can enhance performance and help alleviate the negative effects of a mixed Eimeria infection.
authors.affiliation: Avian Immunobiology Laboratory, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061.
authors.forename: Miranda M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Ritzi
authors.affiliation: BIOMIN Holding GmbH, 3130 Herzogenburg 3130, Austria Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt 41522.
authors.forename: Wael
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Abdelrahman
authors.affiliation: BIOMIN Holding GmbH, 3130 Herzogenburg 3130, Austria.
authors.forename: Michaela
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mohnl
authors.affiliation: Avian Immunobiology Laboratory, Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061 RDalloul@vt.edu.
authors.forename: Rami A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Dalloul
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D001644:Bifidobacterium / Q000502:physiology; D002645:Chickens / Q000254:growth & development; D003048:Coccidiosis / Q000469:parasitology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000662:veterinary*; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary; D060467:Disease Resistance; D004539:Eimeria / Q000502:physiology*; D016983:Enterococcus / Q000502:physiology; D007778:Lactobacillus / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D033661:Oocysts / Q000502:physiology; D010270:Parasite Egg Count / Q000662:veterinary; D011201:Poultry Diseases / Q000469:parasitology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019936:Probiotics / Q000032:analysis / Q000627:therapeutic use*
keywords: Eimeria; broiler; coccidiosis; performance; probiotic