title: [The comparation of the efficacy of surgical treatment for lung cancer by minimally invasive thoracoscopic and by traditional thoracotomy].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To observe the clinical effects of lung cancer, 75 patients with lung cancer were randomly divided into two groups, observation group underwent minimally invasive thoracic surgery 38 cases and the control group underwent conventional thoracotomy 37 cases.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Observation group was significantly reduced compared with the control group in blood loss, postoperative pleural fluid drainage, postoperative hospital stay, the difference was statistically significant. While there was no statistically significant in the number of lymph node dissection, operative time and postoperative chest tube drainage time.
authors.forename: Sijie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zheng
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013906:Thoracoscopy; D013908:Thoracotomy; D016896:Treatment Outcome