title: Clinical applications of wavefront refraction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine normative reference ranges for higher-order wavefront error (HO-WFE), compare these values with those in common ocular pathologies, and evaluate treatments.
  
  
  METHODS
  A review of 17 major studies on HO-WFE was made, involving data for a total of 31,605 subjects. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for HO-WFE was calculated from the most comprehensive of these studies using normal healthy patients aged 20 to 80 years. There were no studies identified using the natural pupil size for subjects, and for this reason, the HO-WFE was tabulated for pupil diameters of 3 to 7 mm. Effects of keratoconus, pterygium, cataract, and dry eye on HO-WFE were reviewed and treatment efficacy was considered.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The calculated upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE in a healthy normal 35-year-old patient with a mesopic pupil diameter of 6 mm would be 0.471 μm (471 nm) root-mean-square or less. Although the normal HO-WFE increases with age for a given pupil size, it is not yet completely clear how the concurrent influence of age-related pupillary miosis affects these findings. Abnormal ocular conditions such as keratoconus can induce a large HO-WFE, often in excess of 3.0 μm, particularly attributed to coma. For pterygium or cortical cataract, a combination of coma and trefoil was more commonly induced. Nuclear cataract can induce a negative spherical HO-WFE, usually in excess of 1.0 μm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE root-mean-square is about 0.5 μm with normal physiological pupil sizes. With ocular pathologies, HO-WFE can be in excess of 1.0 μm, although many devices and therapeutic and surgical treatments are reported to be highly effective at minimizing HO-WFE. More accurate normative reference ranges for HO-WFE will require future studies using the subjects' natural pupil size.
authors.affiliation: *BScOptom, PhD, FAAO †OD, DSc (Hon), FAAO Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Victoria, Australia (ASB); Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia (ASB); and Nicolitz Eye Consultants, Jacksonville, Florida (LJC).
authors.forename: Adrian S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Bruce
authors.forename: Louis J
authors.initials: LJ
authors.lastname: Catania
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002386:Cataract / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D003261:Contact Lenses; D057108:Corneal Wavefront Aberration / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007640:Keratoconus / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000628:therapy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012029:Refraction, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult