title: Direct investment by stepfathers can mitigate effects on educational outcomes but does not improve behavioural difficulties.
abstract: In contemporary developed populations, stepfather presence has been associated with detrimental effects on child development. However, the proximate mechanisms behind such effects are yet to be fully explored. From a behavioural ecological perspective, the negative effects associated with stepfathers may be due to the reduced quantity and quality of investments children receive within stepfather households. Here, we build on previous studies by investigating whether the effects of stepfather presence on child outcomes are driven by differences in maternal and partner (i.e., father or stepfather) direct investments. We use data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to explore stepfather effects on children's educational achievement and behavioural difficulties at age 7. Our results indicate that, for educational achievement, stepfather effects are due to the lower levels of direct investments children receive. For behavioural difficulty, stepfather effects are due to multiple factors whereby stepfather presence is associated with greater difficulties independent of investment levels, and direct investments from stepfathers are ineffective. Our results suggest that the negative effects of stepfathers on child outcomes can be explained, in part, by the reduced quantity and the ineffectiveness of direct investments children receive from stepfathers. Furthermore, the effects of stepfather direct investments seem to vary between child outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University College London.
authors.forename: Emily H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Emmott
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, University College London.
authors.forename: Ruth
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mace
keywords: ALSPAC; Behavioural difficulties; Educational achievement; Parental investment; Stepfathers