title: Team science for science communication.
abstract: Natural scientists from Climate Central and social scientists from Carnegie Mellon University collaborated to develop science communications aimed at presenting personalized coastal flood risk information to the public. We encountered four main challenges: agreeing on goals; balancing complexity and simplicity; relying on data, not intuition; and negotiating external pressures. Each challenge demanded its own approach. We navigated agreement on goals through intensive internal communication early on in the project. We balanced complexity and simplicity through evaluation of communication materials for user understanding and scientific content. Early user test results that overturned some of our intuitions strengthened our commitment to testing communication elements whenever possible. Finally, we did our best to negotiate external pressures through regular internal communication and willingness to compromise.
authors.affiliation: Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; and gwongpar@cmu.edu.
authors.forename: Gabrielle
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wong-Parodi
authors.affiliation: Climate Central, Princeton, NJ 08542.
authors.forename: Benjamin H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Strauss
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D055864:Droughts; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination / Q000379:methods*; D040242:Risk Reduction Behavior; D012586:Science
keywords: collaboration; informed decision-making