title: Visual performance of a new bi-aspheric, segmented, asymmetric multifocal IOL.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the visual performance and subjective experience of eyes implanted with a new bi-aspheric, segmented, multifocal intraocular lens: the Mplus X (Topcon Europe Medical, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands).
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventeen patients (mean age: 64.0 + 12.8 years) had binocular implantation (34 eyes) with the Mplus X. Three months after the implantation, assessment was made of: manifest refraction; uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity; uncorrected and distance corrected near visual acuity; defocus curves in photopic conditions; contrast sensitivity; halometry as an objective measure of glare; and patient satisfaction with unaided near vision using the Near Acuity Visual Questionnaire.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean residual manifest refraction was -0.13 + 0.51 diopters (D). Twenty-five eyes (74%) were within a mean spherical equivalent of -0.50 D. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was +0.10 + 0.12 logMAR monocularly and 0.02 - 0.09 IogMAR binocularly. Thirty-two eyes (94%) could read 0.3 or better without any reading correction and all patients could read 0.3 or better with a reading correction. Mean monocular uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.18 + 0.16 logMAR, improving to 0.15 + 0.15 logMAR with distance correction. Mean binocular uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.11 - 0.11 logMAR, improving to 0.09 - 0.12 logMAR with distance correction. Mean binocular contrast sensitivity was 1.75 _ 0.14 log units at 3 cycles per degree, 1.88 _ 0.20 log units at 6 cycles per degree, 1.66 + 0.19 log units at 12 cycles per degree, and 1.11 - 0.20 log units at 18 cycles per degree. Mean binocular and monocular halometry showed a glare profile of less than 10 of debilitating light scatter. Mean Near Acuity Visual Questionnaire Rasch score (0 = no difficulty, 100 = extreme difficulty) for satisfaction for near vision was 20.43 - 14.64 log-odd units.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Mplus X provides a good visual outcome at distance and near with minimal dysphotopsia. Patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision.
authors.forename: Emma J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Berrow
authors.forename: James S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Wolffsohn
authors.forename: Paramdeep S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Bilkhu
authors.forename: Sandeep
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dhallu
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D019466:Glare; D006801:Humans; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D007910:Lenses, Intraocular; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018918:Phacoemulsification; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012029:Refraction, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology*