title: Locomotor flexibility in Lepilemur explained by habitat and biomechanics.
abstract: There are at present few comparable studies of lemur locomotion in the wild. This has unfortunately meant we have little knowledge about locomotor variation, and hence flexibility, with regard to differences in support availability and habitat structure. Here we compare the locomotion of Lepilemur edwardsi at Ankarafantsika with that of Lepilemur ruficaudatus at Kirindy-Mitea National Park. While data were collected by two individuals, at different times, both studies used the same data collection protocol and are hence highly comparable. Locomotor mode, support diameter and orientation, heights, and distances traveled were all collected. We find that locomotor specialization, in this case for vertical leaping, has ensured that some support requirements are independent of habitat. For example, both species used vertical supports most often. However, overall support diameter does indicate a certain degree of flexibility, whereby L. ruficaudatus most often used supports ≤5 cm in diameter and L. edwardsi >5 cm in diameter.
authors.affiliation: Musculoskeletal Biology II, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK.
authors.forename: Mary L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Blanchard
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Furnell
authors.forename: William I
authors.initials: WI
authors.lastname: Sellers
authors.forename: Robin H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Crompton
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000885:Anthropology, Physical; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D007901:Lemuridae / Q000502:physiology*; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male
keywords: Madagascar; leaping; lemur; support diameter