title: Two Agendas for Bioethics: Critique and Integration.
abstract: Many bioethicists view the primary task of bioethics as 'value clarification'. In this article, I argue that the field must embrace two more ambitious agendas that go beyond mere clarification. The first agenda, critique, involves unmasking, interrogating, and challenging the presuppositions that underlie bioethical discourse. These largely unarticulated premises establish the boundaries within which problems can be conceptualized and solutions can be imagined. The function of critique, then, is not merely to clarify these premises but to challenge them and the boundaries they define. The second agenda, integration, involves honoring and unifying what is right in competing values. Integration is the morally ideal response to value conflict, offering the potential for transcending win/lose outcomes. The function of integration, then, is to envision actions or policies that not only resolve conflicts, but that do so by jointly realizing many genuine values in deep and compelling ways. My argument proceeds in stages. After critically examining the role and dominant status of value clarification in bioethical discourse, I describe the nature and value of the two agendas, identify concrete examples of where each has been and could be successful, and explain why a critical integrative bioethics--one that appreciates the joint necessity and symbiotic potential of the two agendas--is crucial to the future of the field. The ultimate goal of all of this is to offer a more compelling vision for how bioethics might conduct itself within the larger intellectual and social world it seeks to understand and serve.
authors.forename: Jeremy R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Garrett
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics / Q000639:trends*; D003210:Concept Formation; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D028663:Ethical Theory; D026822:Ethicists; D006801:Humans; D011340:Problem Solving; D012945:Social Values
keywords: animal research; critique; individual liberty; public health ethics; value clarification; value conflict; value integration