title: Dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination first-line therapy versus tamsulosin monotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a budget impact analysis in the Greek healthcare setting.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of this study was to explore the budget impact of dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination (DUT + TAM FDC) versus tamsulosin monotherapy, in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from the perspective of the Greek healthcare insurance system.
  
  
  METHODS
  A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to estimate the financial consequences of adopting DUT + TAM FDC within the Greek healthcare setting. The model, compared six mutually exclusive health states in two alternative treatment options: current standard of care and the introduction of DUT + TAM FDC in the market. The model used clinical inputs from the CombAT study; data on resource use associated with the management of BPH in Greece were derived from expert panel, and unit cost data were derived from official reimbursement tariffs. A payer perspective was taken into account. As patient distribution data between public and private sectors are not available in Greece two scenarios were investigated, considering the whole eligible population in each scenario. A 4 year time horizon was taken into account and included treatment costs, number of transurethral resections of the prostate (TURPs) and acute urinary retention (AUR) episodes avoided.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The clinical benefit from the market adoption of DUT + TAM FDC in Greece was 1,758 TURPs and 972 episodes of AUR avoided cumulatively in a four year period. The increase in total costs from the gradual introduction of DUT + TAM FDC to the Greek healthcare system ranges from €1.3 million in the first year to €5.8 million in the fourth year, for the public sector, and €1.2 million to €4.0 million, for the private sector. This represents an increase of 1.91% to 7.94% for the public sector and 1.10% 3.29% in the private sector, during the 4-year time horizon.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Budget impact analysis (BIA) results indicated that the gradual introduction of DUT + TAM FDC, would increase the overall budget of the disease, however providing better clinical outcomes. DUT + TAM FDC drug acquisition cost is partly offset by the reduction in the costs associated with the treatment of the disease.
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Geitona
authors.affiliation: GlaxoSmithKline, Athens, Greece. pinelopi.a.karabela@gsk.com.
authors.forename: Pinelopi
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Karabela
authors.forename: Ioannis A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Katsoulis
authors.forename: Hara
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Kousoulakou
authors.forename: Eleni
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lyberopoulou
authors.forename: Eleftherios
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bitros
authors.forename: Loukas
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Xaplanteris
authors.forename: Sotiria
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Papanicolaou
mesh_terms: D001378:Azasteroids / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002017:Budgets; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D000068538:Dutasteride; D006115:Greece; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009819:Office Visits / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000601:surgery; D013449:Sulfonamides / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000077409:Tamsulosin; D020728:Transurethral Resection of Prostate / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016055:Urinary Retention / Q000517:prevention & control; D064804:Urological Agents / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D001378:Azasteroids; D013449:Sulfonamides; D064804:Urological Agents; D000077409:Tamsulosin; D000068538:Dutasteride