title: Nanosafety research--are we on the right track?
abstract: The number of studies that have been published on the topic of nanosafety speaks for itself. We have seen an almost exponential rise over the past 15 years or so in the number of articles on nanotoxicology. Although only a couple of hundred papers had appeared on the topic of "Nanomaterials: environmental and health effects" before 2000, this number has exploded to over 10 000 since 2001. Most of these studies, however, do not offer any kind of clear statement on the safety of nanomaterials. On the contrary, most of them are either self-contradictory or arrive at completely erroneous conclusions. Three years ago in this Journal we underscored the deficiencies in the way these studies were designed and pointed out the sources of error in the methods used. Now, on the basis of a comprehensive review of the literature and with the help of selected toxicological end points, we attempt to indicate where the significant weaknesses of these studies lie and what we must improve in the future.
authors.affiliation: International Reserach Cooperations Manager, Empa, Lerchenfeldstrasse 5, St. Gallen, 9014 (Switzerland). harald.krug@empa.ch.
authors.forename: Harald F
authors.initials: HF
authors.lastname: Krug
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D054750:Ecotoxicology / Q000379:methods; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000032:analysis; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism / Q000633:toxicity*; D006801:Humans; D008168:Lung / Q000187:drug effects; D049329:Nanostructures / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity*; D012106:Research
chemical_list: D004785:Environmental Pollutants
keywords: environmental chemistry; nanoparticles; nanotechnology; safety research; toxicology