title: The communication of the radiation risk from CT in relation to its clinical benefit in the era of personalized medicine: part 2: benefits versus risk of CT.
abstract: In order to personalize the communication of the CT risk, we need to describe the risk in the context of the clinical benefit of CT, which will generally be much higher, provided a CT scan has a well-established clinical indication. However as pediatric radiologists we should be careful not to overstate the benefit of CT, being aware that medico-legal pressures and the realities of health care economics have led to overutilization of the technology. And even though we should not use previously accumulated radiation dose to a child as an argument against conducting a clinically indicated scan (the "sunk-cost" bias), we should consider patients' radiation history in the diagnostic decision process. As a contribution to future public health, it makes more sense to look for non-radiating alternatives to CT in the much larger group of basically healthy children who are receiving occasional scans for widely prevalent conditions such as appendicitis and trauma than to attempt lowering CT use in the smaller group of patients with chronic conditions with a limited life expectancy. When communicating the CT risk with individual patients and their parents, we should acknowledge and address their concerns within the framework of informed decision-making. When appropriate, we may express the individual radiation risk, based on estimates of summated absorbed organ dose, as an order of magnitude rather than as an absolute number, and compare this with the much larger natural cancer incidence over a child's lifetime, and with other risks in medicine and daily life. We should anticipate that many patients cannot make informed decisions on their own in this complex matter, and we should offer our guidance while maintaining respect for patient autonomy. Proper documentation of the informed decision process is important for future reference. In concert with our referring physicians, pediatric radiologists are well-equipped to tackle the complexities associated with the communication of CT risk, a task that often falls upon us, and by becoming more involved in the diagnostic decision process we can add value to the health care system.
authors.affiliation: Division of Pediatric Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 34 Fruit St., White 246A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA, swestra@partners.org.
authors.forename: Sjirk J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Westra
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D038622:Internationality; D008297:Male; D009381:Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / Q000517:prevention & control*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D010372:Pediatrics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010819:Physician's Role; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D057285:Precision Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D015995:Prevalence; D011871:Radiology / Q000458:organization & administration*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014481:United States