title: The multidimensional assessment of perfectionistic automatic thoughts: a commentary on "Examining mutual suppression effects in the assessment of perfectionism cognitions: evidence supporting multidimensional assessment".
abstract: In the current article, we comment on a recent article by Stoeber, Kobori, and Brown that provided evidence suggesting that a multidimensional approach to perfectionistic cognitions is superior to a unidimensional approach in predicting maladjustment. They also showed with their data from a university student sample that our Perfectionism Cognitions Inventory has multiple factors in contrast to our unidimensional approach. Our commentary focuses primarily on the issue of whether the Perfectionism Cognitions Inventory should be considered unidimensional versus multidimensional and outlines concerns about how perfectionism cognition factors should be used and interpreted. Although there are serious interpretive problems inherent in existing multidimensional measures of perfectionism cognitions, it is apparent that a cognitive approach is an important and viable supplement to the extensive focus on the trait multidimensional perfectionism that is currently in vogue. We conclude by discussing the potential clinical uses of cognitive assessments of perfectionism.
authors.affiliation: York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada gflett@yorku.ca.
authors.forename: Gordon L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Flett
authors.affiliation: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: Paul L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Hewitt
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010551:Personality; D010552:Personality Assessment
keywords: automatic thoughts; cognition; perfectionism