title: A comparison between the example reference biosphere model ERB 2B and a process-based model: simulation of a natural release scenario.
abstract: The BIOMASS methodology was developed with the objective of constructing defensible assessment biospheres for assessing potential radiological impacts of radioactive waste repositories. To this end, a set of Example Reference Biospheres were developed to demonstrate the use of the methodology and to provide an international point of reference. In this paper, the performance of the Example Reference Biosphere model ERB 2B associated with the natural release scenario, discharge of contaminated groundwater to the surface environment, was evaluated by comparing its long-term projections of radionuclide dynamics and distribution in a soil-plant system to those of a process-based, transient advection-dispersion model (AD). The models were parametrised with data characteristic of a typical rainfed winter wheat crop grown on a sandy loam soil under temperate climate conditions. Three safety-relevant radionuclides, (99)Tc, (129)I and (237)Np with different degree of sorption were selected for the study. Although the models were driven by the same hydraulic (soil moisture content and water fluxes) and radiological (Kds) input data, their projections were remarkably different. On one hand, both models were able to capture short and long-term variation in activity concentration in the subsoil compartment. On the other hand, the Reference Biosphere model did not project any radionuclide accumulation in the topsoil and crop compartments. This behaviour would underestimate the radiological exposure under natural release scenarios. The results highlight the potential role deep roots play in soil-to-plant transfer under a natural release scenario where radionuclides are released into the subsoil. When considering the relative activity and root depth profiles within the soil column, much of the radioactivity was taken up into the crop from the subsoil compartment. Further improvements were suggested to address the limitations of the Reference Biosphere model presented in this paper.
authors.affiliation: Biosphere Impact Studies, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, Mol 2400, Belgium. Electronic address: talal.al.mahain@sckcen.be.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Almahayni
mesh_terms: D001530:Belgium; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000378:metabolism*; D007457:Iodine Radioisotopes / Q000378:metabolism; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009405:Neptunium / Q000378:metabolism*; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000378:metabolism; D011834:Radiation Monitoring; D012990:Soil Pollutants, Radioactive / Q000378:metabolism*; D013667:Technetium / Q000378:metabolism*; D014908:Triticum / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D007457:Iodine Radioisotopes; D012990:Soil Pollutants, Radioactive; D009405:Neptunium; D013667:Technetium
keywords: Advection-dispersion model; BIOMASS methodology; Example Reference Biosphere; Radiological impact assessment; Weighted transfer factor