title: Systems approach to monitoring and evaluation guides scale up of the Standard Days Method of family planning in Rwanda.
abstract: There is no guarantee that a successful pilot program introducing a reproductive health innovation can also be expanded successfully to the national or regional level, because the scaling-up process is complex and multilayered. This article describes how a successful pilot program to integrate the Standard Days Method (SDM) of family planning into existing Ministry of Health services was scaled up nationally in Rwanda. Much of the success of the scale-up effort was due to systematic use of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) data from several sources to make midcourse corrections. Four lessons learned illustrate this crucially important approach. First, ongoing M&E data showed that provider training protocols and client materials that worked in the pilot phase did not work at scale; therefore, we simplified these materials to support integration into the national program. Second, triangulation of ongoing monitoring data with national health facility and population-based surveys revealed serious problems in supply chain mechanisms that affected SDM (and the accompanying CycleBeads client tool) availability and use; new procedures for ordering supplies and monitoring stockouts were instituted at the facility level. Third, supervision reports and special studies revealed that providers were imposing unnecessary medical barriers to SDM use; refresher training and revised supervision protocols improved provider practices. Finally, informal environmental scans, stakeholder interviews, and key events timelines identified shifting political and health policy environments that influenced scale-up outcomes; ongoing advocacy efforts are addressing these issues. The SDM scale-up experience in Rwanda confirms the importance of monitoring and evaluating programmatic efforts continuously, using a variety of data sources, to improve program outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Georgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health , Washington, DC , USA.
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Igras
authors.affiliation: Georgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health , Washington, DC , USA.
authors.forename: Irit
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Sinai
authors.affiliation: Institute for Reproductive Health , Kigali , Rwanda.
authors.forename: Marie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mukabatsinda
authors.affiliation: Ministry of Health [Rwanda] , Kigali , Rwanda.
authors.forename: Fidele
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Ngabo
authors.affiliation: Georgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health , Washington, DC , USA.
authors.forename: Victoria
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Jennings
authors.affiliation: Georgetown University's, Institute for Reproductive Health , Washington, DC , USA.
authors.forename: Rebecka
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lundgren
mesh_terms: D003267:Contraception / Q000379:methods*; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000592:standards; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005193:Family Planning Services / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008597:Menstrual Cycle; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012432:Rwanda; D012736:Sex Education; D012725:Sexual Behavior