title: Comparing multilevel and Bayesian spatial random effects survival models to assess geographical inequalities in colorectal cancer survival: a case study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Multilevel and spatial models are being increasingly used to obtain substantive information on area-level inequalities in cancer survival. Multilevel models assume independent geographical areas, whereas spatial models explicitly incorporate geographical correlation, often via a conditional autoregressive prior. However the relative merits of these methods for large population-based studies have not been explored. Using a case-study approach, we report on the implications of using multilevel and spatial survival models to study geographical inequalities in all-cause survival.
  
  
  METHODS
  Multilevel discrete-time and Bayesian spatial survival models were used to study geographical inequalities in all-cause survival for a population-based colorectal cancer cohort of 22,727 cases aged 20-84 years diagnosed during 1997-2007 from Queensland, Australia.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both approaches were viable on this large dataset, and produced similar estimates of the fixed effects. After adding area-level covariates, the between-area variability in survival using multilevel discrete-time models was no longer significant. Spatial inequalities in survival were also markedly reduced after adjusting for aggregated area-level covariates. Only the multilevel approach however, provided an estimation of the contribution of geographical variation to the total variation in survival between individual patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With little difference observed between the two approaches in the estimation of fixed effects, multilevel models should be favored if there is a clear hierarchical data structure and measuring the independent impact of individual- and area-level effects on survival differences is of primary interest. Bayesian spatial analyses may be preferred if spatial correlation between areas is important and if the priority is to assess small-area variations in survival and map spatial patterns. Both approaches can be readily fitted to geographically enabled survival data from international settings.
authors.forename: Paramita
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dasgupta
authors.forename: Susanna M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Cramb
authors.forename: Joanne F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Aitken
authors.forename: Gavin
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Turrell
authors.affiliation: Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia. peterbaade@cancerqld.org.au.
authors.forename: Peter D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Baade
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D015331:Cohort Studies; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality*; D005260:Female; D062305:Geographic Mapping; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055361:Multilevel Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D011793:Queensland / Q000453:epidemiology; D011897:Random Allocation; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D016019:Survival Analysis; D055815:Young Adult