title: Visuospatial tasks affect locomotor control more than nonspatial tasks in older people.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Previous research has shown that visuospatial processing requiring working memory is particularly important for balance control during standing and stepping, and that limited spatial encoding contributes to increased interference in postural control dual tasks. However, visuospatial involvement during locomotion has not been directly determined. This study examined the effects of a visuospatial cognitive task versus a nonspatial cognitive task on gait speed, smoothness and variability in older people, while controlling for task difficulty.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-six people aged ≥75 years performed three walking trials along a 20 m walkway under the following conditions: (i) an easy nonspatial task; (ii) a difficult nonspatial task; (iii) an easy visuospatial task; and (iv) a difficult visuospatial task. Gait parameters were computed from a tri-axial accelerometer attached to the sacrum. The cognitive task response times and percentage of correct answers during walking and seated trials were also computed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No significant differences in either cognitive task type error rates or response times were evident in the seated conditions, indicating equivalent task difficulty. In the walking trials, participants responded faster to the visuospatial tasks than the nonspatial tasks but at the cost of making significantly more cognitive task errors. Participants also walked slower, took shorter steps, had greater step time variability and less smooth pelvis accelerations when concurrently performing the visuospatial tasks compared with the nonspatial tasks and when performing the difficult compared with the easy cognitive tasks.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with nonspatial cognitive tasks, visuospatial cognitive tasks led to a slower, more variable and less smooth gait pattern. These findings suggest that visuospatial processing might share common networks with locomotor control, further supporting the hypothesis that gait changes during dual task paradigms are not simply due to limited attentional resources but to competition for common networks for spatial information encoding.
authors.affiliation: Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Jasmine C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Menant
authors.affiliation: Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Daina L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Sturnieks
authors.affiliation: Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Matthew A D
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Brodie
authors.affiliation: Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Health Science, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia.
authors.forename: Stuart T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.affiliation: Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Stephen R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Lord
mesh_terms: D000058:Accidental Falls; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013037:Spatial Behavior / Q000502:physiology*