title: End-of-Life Decisions about Withholding or Withdrawing Therapy: Medical, Ethical, and Religio-Cultural Considerations.
abstract: Towards the end of life, physicians face dilemmas of discontinuing life-sustaining treatments or interventions. In some circumstances, these treatments are no longer of benefit, while in others the patient or family no longer want them. The physician plays an essential role in clarifying the goals of medical treatment, defining the care plan, initiating discussions about life-sustaining therapy, educating patients and families, helping them deliberate, making recommendations, and implementing the treatment plan. Communication is key. It should be clarified that when inevitable death is imminent, it is legitimate to refuse or limit forms of treatment that would only secure a precarious and burdensome prolongation of life, for as long as basic humane, compassionate care is not interrupted. Agreement to DNR status does not preclude supportive measures that keep patients free from pain and suffering as possible. Acceptable clinical practice on withdrawing or withholding treatment is based on an understanding of the medical, ethical, cultural, and religious issues. There is a need to individualize care option discussions to illness status, and patient and family preferences, beliefs, values, and cultures. The process of shared decision making between the patient, the family, and the clinicians should continue as goals evolve and change over time.
authors.affiliation: Palliative Care Unit, Cancer Center, The Medical City, Ortigas, Pasig City, Philippines; Supportive and Palliative Care Service, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Far Eastern University-Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, Fairview, Quezon City, Philippines.
authors.forename: Maria Fidelis C
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Manalo
keywords: CPR; DNR; euthanasia; withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment