title: The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Several studies have shown that hearing thresholds alone cannot adequately predict listeners' success with hearing-aid amplification. Furthermore, previous studies have shown marked differences in listeners' susceptibility to distortions introduced by certain nonlinear amplification parameters.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to examine the role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining perceptual susceptibility to temporal envelope and other hearing-aid compression-induced distortions for listeners with mild to moderate and moderate to severe hearing loss.
  
  
  METHODS
  A between-subjects repeated-measures design was used to compare speech recognition scores with linear versus compression amplification, for listeners with mild to moderate and moderate to severe hearing loss.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study included 15 adult listeners with mild to moderate hearing loss and 13 adults with moderate to severe hearing loss.
  
  
  METHODS
  Speech recognition scores were measured for vowel-consonant-vowel syllables processed with linear, moderate compression, and extreme compression amplification. Perceptual susceptibility to compression-induced temporal envelope distortion was defined as the difference in scores between linear and compression amplification. Both overall scores and consonant feature scores (i.e., place, manner, and voicing) were analyzed. Narrowband spectral resolution was measured using individual measures of auditory filter bandwidth at 2000 Hz. Working memory was measured using the reading span test. Signal audibility was quantified using the Aided Audibility Index. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the predictive role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility benefit on listeners' susceptibility to compression-induced distortions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For all listeners, spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility benefit were significant predictors of overall distortion scores. For listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss, spectral resolution and audibility benefit predicted distortion scores for consonant place and manner of articulation features, and audibility benefit predicted distortion scores for consonant voicing features. For listeners with mild to moderate hearing loss, the model did not predict distortion scores for overall or consonant feature scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results from this study suggest that when audibility is adequately controlled, measures of spectral resolution may identify the listeners who are most susceptible to compression-induced distortions. Working memory appears to modulate the negative effect of these distortions for listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, MN.
authors.forename: Evelyn
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Davies-Venn
authors.affiliation: Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowles Hearing Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Souza
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D006309:Hearing; D006310:Hearing Aids; D034381:Hearing Loss / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008570:Memory, Short-Term