title: Failure or success of search strategies to identify adverse effects of medical devices: a feasibility study using a systematic review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Research has indicated that adverse effects terms are increasingly prevalent in the title, abstract or indexing terms of articles that contain adverse drug effects data in MEDLINE and Embase. However, it is unknown whether adverse effects terms are present in the database records of articles that contain adverse effects data of medical devices, and thus, to what extent the development of an adverse effects search filter for medical devices may be feasible.
  
  
  METHODS
  A case study systematic review of a medical device was selected. The included studies from a systematic review of the safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) for spinal fusion were used in the analysis. For each included study, the corresponding database record on MEDLINE and Embase was assessed to measure the presence or absence of adverse effects terms in the title, abstract or indexing. The performance of each potential adverse effects search term was also measured and compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 82 publications (49 studies) included in the systematic review with 51 of these indexed on MEDLINE and 55 on Embase. Ninety-four percent (48/51) of the records on MEDLINE and 95% (52/55) of the records on Embase contained at least one adverse effects related search term. The wide variety of adverse effects terms included in the title, abstract or indexing of bibliographic records, and the lack of any individual high-performing search terms suggests that a combination of terms in different fields is required to identify adverse effects of medical devices. In addition, the most successful search terms differed from the most successful terms for identifying adverse drug effects.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The search filters currently available for adverse drug effects are not necessarily useful for searching adverse effects data of medical devices. The presence of adverse effects terms in the bibliographic records of articles on medical devices, however, indicates that combinations of adverse effects search terms may be useful in search strategies in MEDLINE and Embase. The results, therefore, suggest that not only a search filter for the adverse effects of medical devices is feasible, but also that it should be a research priority.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK. su.golder@york.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Su
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Golder
authors.forename: Kath
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rodgers
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D000043:Abstracting and Indexing; D055396:Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 / Q000009:adverse effects; D001861:Bone Regeneration; D004864:Equipment and Supplies / Q000009:adverse effects; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval; D016239:MEDLINE / Q000592:standards; D019736:Prostheses and Implants / Q000009:adverse effects; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000009:adverse effects; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D016212:Transforming Growth Factor beta / Q000009:adverse effects; D018875:Vocabulary, Controlled; D000078202:Systematic Reviews as Topic
chemical_list: D055396:Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2; C499469:recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D016212:Transforming Growth Factor beta