title: Use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care services: a narrative literature review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Mobile text messages are a widely recognized communication method in societies, as the global penetration of the technology approaches 100% worldwide. Systematic knowledge is still lacking on how the mobile telephone text messaging (short message service, SMS) has been used in health care services.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study aims to review the literature on the use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a systematic literature review of studies on mobile telephone text message reminders. The data sources used were PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Proquest Databases/ PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and hand searching since 2003. Studies reporting the use of SMS intended to remind patients in health services were included. Given the heterogeneity in the studies, descriptive characteristics, purpose of the study, response rates, description of the intervention, dose and timing, instruments, outcome measures, and outcome data from the studies were synthesized using a narrative approach.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From 911 initial citations, 60 studies were included in the review. The studies reported a variety of use for SMS. Mobile telephone text message reminders were used as the only intervention in 73% (44/60) of the studies, and in 27% (16/60) of the remaining studies, SMS was connected to another comprehensive health intervention system. SMS reminders were sent to different patient groups: patients with HIV/AIDS (15%, 9/60) and diabetes (13%, 8/60) being the most common groups. The response rates of the studies varied from 22-100%. Typically, the text message reminders were sent daily. The time before the specific intervention to be rendered varied from 10 minutes (eg, medication taken) to 2 weeks (eg, scheduled appointment). A wide range of different evaluation methods and outcomes were used to assess the impact of SMS varying from existing databases (eg, attendance rate based on medical records), questionnaires, and physiological measures. About three quarters of the studies (77%, 46/60) reported improved outcomes: adherence to medication or to treatment reportedly improved in 40% (24/60) of the studies, appointment attendance in 18% (11/60) of the studies, and non-attendance rates decreased in 18% (11/60) of the studies. Other positive impacts were decreased amount of missed medication doses, more positive attitudes towards medication, and reductions in treatment interruptions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We can conclude that although SMS reminders are used with different patient groups in health care, SMS is less systematically studied with randomized controlled trial study design. Although the amount of evidence for SMS application recommendations is still limited, having 77% (46/60) of the studies showing improved outcomes may indicate its use in health care settings. However, more well-conducted SMS studies are still needed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. kaankan@utu.fi.
authors.forename: Kati Anneli
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8357-8902
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Kannisto
authors.forename: Marita Hannele
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-4353
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Koivunen
authors.forename: Maritta Anneli
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-9290
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Välimäki
mesh_terms: D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000628:therapy; D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D040421:Cell Phone; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000628:therapy; D006296:Health Services; D006801:Humans; D017010:Reminder Systems; D012107:Research Design; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D060145:Text Messaging
keywords: cellular phone; reminder system; review; short message service; text messaging