title: Reply to 'The 'extremely ancient' chromosome that isn't' by Elhaik et al.
authors.affiliation: 1] ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA [2] Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Fernando L
authors.initials: FL
authors.lastname: Mendez
authors.affiliation: 1] ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA [2] Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Krishna R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Veeramah
authors.affiliation: Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Mark G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.affiliation: ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
authors.forename: Tatiana M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Karafet
authors.affiliation: ARL Division of Biotechnology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
authors.forename: Michael F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Hammer
mesh_terms: D001741:Black or African American / Q000235:genetics*; D041322:Chromosomes, Human, Y / Q000235:genetics*; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial