title: A study on characteristics of core projects described in 3rd community health plans.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The 3rd community health plan let health centers select and promote core projects considering budget and manpower. This study analyzed the content and selection processes of core projects, using the nationwide 3rd community health plans, to give relevant information on health center policies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Classification criteria for content analysis of core projects were established and verified through a literature review and by specialist discussions. Fifty plans were selected by stratified proportional random sampling for regional characteristics. And coding criteria standardized through coding repetition and discussion, by 2 persons (k> 0.7). Using stratified proportional random sampling for 16 cities and provinces, regional characteristics, 117 plans were selected, and the contents of the core project selection processes and program contents analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The survey was used by 59.8 % of samples as a core project decision-making method. The participants included 98.6, 81.4, 40 and 38.6% of the health staffs, residents, medical institutions, and administrators, respectively. Discussion was used by 15.4% of samples. The participants were health staffs by 100% as a great. The ranking of the frequencies of the selected core projects were, in order; chronic disease control, health promotion, elderly health, maternal-child health, and oral health at 16.4, 14.8, 14.3, 12.7 and 11.9%, respectively. Analyses on the chronic disease control and elderly health contents showed the diversity of object disease, high rates of visitors on patient detection programs, high rates of unclear target populations, and the provision of medical exams and treatments as the main services, with high variations in business per-formance. The national health budgets for health centers in 2003 were about 910 and 240 million won for chronic disease control and elderly health, respectively, which were less than for the other five priority core projects.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The chronic disease control and elderly health at the health centers were not standardized for object disease, patient detection program, target population, service provision, and national support budget was insufficient. Thus it is necessary to develop standard guidelines, and increase financial support, for chronic disease control and elderly health.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea.
authors.forename: Dong Moon
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea.
authors.forename: Weon Young
authors.initials: WY
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea.
authors.forename: Chang Yup
authors.initials: CY
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Korea.
authors.forename: Ok Ryun
authors.initials: OR
authors.lastname: Moon
keywords: Community health plan; Content analysis; Core project; Health center; Health center function; Priority setting