title: Building robust conservation plans.
abstract: Systematic conservation planning optimizes trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human activities by accounting for socioeconomic costs while aiming to achieve prescribed conservation objectives. However, the most cost-efficient conservation plan can be very dissimilar to any other plan achieving the set of conservation objectives. This is problematic under conditions of implementation uncertainty (e.g., if all or part of the plan becomes unattainable). We determined through simulations of parallel implementation of conservation plans and habitat loss the conditions under which optimal plans have limited chances of implementation and where implementation attempts would fail to meet objectives. We then devised a new, flexible method for identifying conservation priorities and scheduling conservation actions. This method entails generating a number of alternative plans, calculating the similarity in site composition among all plans, and selecting the plan with the highest density of neighboring plans in similarity space. We compared our method with the classic method that maximizes cost efficiency with synthetic and real data sets. When implementation was uncertain--a common reality--our method provided higher likelihood of achieving conservation targets. We found that χ, a measure of the shortfall in objectives achieved by a conservation plan if the plan could not be implemented entirely, was the main factor determining the relative performance of a flexibility enhanced approach to conservation prioritization. Our findings should help planning authorities prioritize conservation efforts in the face of uncertainty about future condition and availability of sites.
authors.affiliation: Microsoft Research, 21 Station Road, Cambridge, CB1 2FB, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Piero
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Visconti
authors.forename: Lucas
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Joppa
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D017753:Ecosystem; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D035501:Uncertainty
keywords: complementariedad; complementarity; conservation implementation; conservation prioritization; decision theory; habitat loss; implementación de la conservación; incertidumbre; optimización; optimization; priorización de la conservación; protected areas; pérdida de hábitat; teoría de decisión; uncertainty; áreas protegidas