title: Is periodontal disease a public health problem?
abstract: Clinically defined periodontal disease is highly prevalent, has considerable impacts on individuals and society and is costly to treat; the cost of dental care is the fourth highest costs of all diseases and consuming between 5 and 10% of all healthcare resources. Changes in the epidemiology of clinically defined periodontal diseases suggest that the prevalence of severe periodontal disease is low and rates of progression of periodontal destruction tend to be relatively slow. Current periodontal care modalities have a remarkably weak evidence base, with considerable resources allocated to fund interventions that include oral hygiene instruction, scale and polishes through to surgical interventions. The public health problem lies more in the failure in design of a contract between dental professionals and the state. Such a contract needs to recognise both the wider determinants of disease and the role that dental professionals could play: a contract that concentrated on rewarding outcomes, namely a diminution in treatment need, as opposed to one based simply on the number of interventions would be a major step forward.
authors.affiliation: Dental Public Health Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 119 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Batchelor
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D010518:Periodontitis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011634:Public Health; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology