title: Rethinking the moral permissibility of gamete donation.
abstract: The dominant philosophical view of gamete donation as morally permissible (when practiced in the right way) rests on two premises: (1) parental obligations are triggered primarily by playing a causal role (as agent cause) in procreation, not by genetic ties, and (2) those obligations are transferable-that is, they are obligations to make adequate provision for the child's needs, not necessarily to raise the child oneself. Thus while gamete donors are indeed agent causes of the children that their donation helps to bring into existence, most think that donors' obligations are discharged insofar as they know that competent others intend to care for those children. In this article, I call into question this dominant view by challenging both of its premises. Challenging the first premise, I argue that genetic parenthood is what primarily triggers parental obligations. Challenging the second premise, I claim that those obligations are non-transferable-i.e., that they are obligations not simply to ensure that someone will raise one's genetic child, but to raise that child oneself (unless one is incompetent). The implication of my argument is that gamete donation is inherently wrong insofar as it involves acquiring non-transferable obligations that one has no intention of fulfilling.
authors.affiliation: School of Philosophy, The Catholic University of America, Aquinas Hall 100, 620 Michigan Ave. NE, Washington, DC, 20064, USA, melissamoschella1@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Melissa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moschella
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002668:Child Rearing; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005854:Germ Cells; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009014:Morals; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D010290:Parents; D036801:Parturition; D012098:Reproduction / Q000941:ethics*; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000941:ethics*