title: Analysis of age and disease status as predictors of thyroid cancer-specific mortality using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Age at diagnosis is incorporated into all relevant staging systems for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). There is growing evidence that a specific age cutoff may not be ideal for accurate risk stratification. We sought to evaluate the interplay between age and oncologic variables in patients with DTC using the largest cohort to date.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End RESULTS (SEER) database was queried to identify patients with DTC as their only malignancy for the period 1973 to 2009. Multivariate analyses using a range of age cutoffs and age subgroupings were utilized in order to search for an optimal age that would provide the most significant risk stratification between young and old patients. The primary outcome was disease-specific survival (DSS) and covariates included: age, race, sex, tumor/nodal/metastasis (TNM) stage, decade of diagnosis, and radioactive iodine therapy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 85,740 patients were identified. Seventy-six percent of patients were American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I, 8% were stage II, 7% were stage III, and 8% were stage IV. Age over 45 years (hazard ratio [HR] 19.2, p<0.001) and metastatic disease (HR 13.1, p<0.001) were the strongest predictors of DSS. Other factors that significantly predicted DSS included: not receiving radioactive iodine (RAI; HR 1.3, p=0.002), T3 (HR 2.6, p<0.001), and T4 disease (HR 3.3, p<0.001), and nodal spread (HR 2.6 to 3.3, p<0.001). Female sex showed a significant protective effect (HR 0.7, p=0.001). Adjusting the age-group cutoff from 25 to 55 years showed consistently high HRs for advanced age, without a distinct change at any point. Comparing HRs for T, N, and M stage between young and old patient subgroups showed that advanced disease increased the risk for DSS regardless of age, and was oftentimes a worse prognosticator in young patient groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The contribution of age at diagnosis to a patient's DSS is considerable, but there is no age cutoff that affords any unique risk-stratification in patients with DTC.
authors.affiliation: 1 Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, California.
authors.forename: Ryan K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Orosco
authors.forename: Timon
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hussain
authors.forename: Kevin T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Brumund
authors.forename: Deborah K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Oh
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Chang
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bouvet
mesh_terms: D018263:Adenocarcinoma, Follicular / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D002291:Carcinoma, Papillary / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000473:pathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D060787:Neoplasm Grading; D018426:SEER Program; D013961:Thyroid Gland / Q000473:pathology*; D013964:Thyroid Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology