title: The Health Legislation Amendment Act 2013 (QLD) and Queensland's health assets privatisation dispute.
abstract: 'New legislation in Queensland has provided a "pathway" for the privatisation of health assets and services in Queensland, which effectively realigns the health care system to the financial market. This column explores how this legislation contained the antecedents of the Queensland doctors' dispute when doctors roundly rejected new employment contracts in February 2014. It also argues that such legislation and its attendant backlash provides a valuable case study in view of the federal government's 2014 budget offer to the States of extra funding if they sell their health assets to fund new infrastructure. The move to privatise health in Queensland has also resulted in a government assault on the ethical credibility of the opposing medical profession and changes to the health complaints system with the introduction of a Health Ombudsman under ministerial control. The column examines these changes in light of R (Heather) v Leonard Cheshire Foundation [2001] EWHC Admin 429, a case concerning the obligations of a private entity towards publically funded clients in the United Kingdom. In discussing concerns about the impact of privatisation on the medical profession, the column points to a stark conflict between the duty to operate hospitals as a business rather than as a duty to patients.
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Colton
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Faunce
mesh_terms: D032982:Contracts / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004651:Employment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010820:Physicians / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011332:Privatization / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011793:Queensland