title: Systematic review of apraxia treatments to improve occupational performance outcomes.
abstract: The objective was to assess effectiveness of apraxia treatments using a systematic review. In contrast to previous reviews, each study was rated as to its applicability to occupational therapy practice and its focus on occupational performance using the FAME rating system (defined by four categories: Feasibility, Appropriateness, Meaningfulness, Effectiveness). This systematic review included eight studies: four randomized controlled trials (level 1 evidence) and four pre-post designs (level 3 evidence). Three treatment approaches were reported: errorless learning with training of details; gesture training; and strategy training. FAME scores ranged from A to C. All studies reported significant treatment effects, but only one demonstrated an impact on observed occupational performance that transferred from clinic to home.
authors.forename: Kathryn
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lindsten-McQueen
authors.forename: Nikki Williamson
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Weiner
authors.forename: Hsin-Yen
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Naomi
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Josman
authors.forename: Lisa Tabor
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Connor
mesh_terms: D001072:Apraxias / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D009788:Occupational Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome