title: Some Challenges Posed by Coal Bed Methane Regional Assessment Modeling.
abstract: Coal measures (coal bearing rock strata) can contain large reserves of methane. These reserves are being exploited at a rapidly increasing rate in many parts of the world. To extract coal seam gas, thousands of wells are drilled at relatively small spacing to depressurize coal seams to induce desorption and allow subsequent capture of the gas. To manage this process effectively, the effect of coal bed methane (CBM) extraction on regional aquifer systems must be properly understood and managed. Groundwater modeling is an integral part of this management process. However, modeling of CBM impacts presents some unique challenges, as processes that are operative at two very different scales must be adequately represented in the models. The impacts of large-scale gas extraction may be felt over a large area, yet despite the significant upscaling that accompanies construction of a regional model, near-well conditions and processes cannot be ignored. These include the highly heterogeneous nature of many coal measures, and the dual-phase flow of water and gas that is induced by coal seam depressurization. To understand these challenges, a fine-scale model was constructed incorporating a detailed representation of lithological heterogeneity to ensure that near-well processes and conditions could be examined. The detail of this heterogeneity was at a level not previously employed in models built to assess groundwater impacts arising from CBM extraction. A dual-phase reservoir simulator was used to examine depressurization and water desaturation processes in the vicinity of an extractive wellfield within this fine-scale model. A single-phase simulator was then employed so that depressurization errors incurred by neglecting near-well, dual-phase flow could be explored. Two models with fewer lithological details were then constructed in order to examine the nature of depressurization errors incurred by upscaling and to assess the interaction of the upscaling process with the requirement for adequate representation of near-source, dual-phase processes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Groundwater, Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd, Porirua 5240, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Catherine R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.affiliation: National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. johndoherty@ozemail.com.au.|Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Australia. johndoherty@ozemail.com.au.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Doherty
authors.affiliation: QGC - A BG Group Business, Groundwater project, Level 18, 69 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia. Stephen.Howell@bg-group.com, leon.erriah@bg-group.com.
authors.forename: Stephen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Howell
authors.affiliation: QGC - A BG Group Business, Groundwater project, Level 18, 69 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
authors.forename: Leon
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Erriah
mesh_terms: D003031:Coal; D055593:Geological Phenomena; D060587:Groundwater; D062070:Hydrology; D008697:Methane / Q000737:chemistry*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011793:Queensland; D060986:Water Wells
chemical_list: D003031:Coal; D008697:Methane