title: A flexible Bayesian method for detecting allelic imbalance in RNA-seq data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  One method of identifying cis regulatory differences is to analyze allele-specific expression (ASE) and identify cases of allelic imbalance (AI). RNA-seq is the most common way to measure ASE and a binomial test is often applied to determine statistical significance of AI. This implicitly assumes that there is no bias in estimation of AI. However, bias has been found to result from multiple factors including: genome ambiguity, reference quality, the mapping algorithm, and biases in the sequencing process. Two alternative approaches have been developed to handle bias: adjusting for bias using a statistical model and filtering regions of the genome suspected of harboring bias. Existing statistical models which account for bias rely on information from DNA controls, which can be cost prohibitive for large intraspecific studies. In contrast, data filtering is inexpensive and straightforward, but necessarily involves sacrificing a portion of the data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Here we propose a flexible Bayesian model for analysis of AI, which accounts for bias and can be implemented without DNA controls. In lieu of DNA controls, this Poisson-Gamma (PG) model uses an estimate of bias from simulations. The proposed model always has a lower type I error rate compared to the binomial test. Consistent with prior studies, bias dramatically affects the type I error rate. All of the tested models are sensitive to misspecification of bias. The closer the estimate of bias is to the true underlying bias, the lower the type I error rate. Correct estimates of bias result in a level alpha test.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To improve the assessment of AI, some forms of systematic error (e.g., map bias) can be identified using simulation. The resulting estimates of bias can be used to correct for bias in the PG model, without data filtering. Other sources of bias (e.g., unidentified variant calls) can be easily captured by DNA controls, but are missed by common filtering approaches. Consequently, as variant identification improves, the need for DNA controls will be reduced. Filtering does not significantly improve performance and is not recommended, as information is sacrificed without a measurable gain. The PG model developed here performs well when bias is known, or slightly misspecified. The model is flexible and can accommodate differences in experimental design and bias estimation.
authors.forename: Luis G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: León-Novelo
authors.forename: Lauren M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: McIntyre
authors.forename: Justin M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fear
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 101 Rouse Life Science Building, 36849 Auburn, AL, USA. rmgraze@auburn.edu.
authors.forename: Rita M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Graze
mesh_terms: D022981:Allelic Imbalance; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D015233:Models, Statistical; D016012:Poisson Distribution; D017423:Sequence Analysis, RNA / Q000379:methods*