Controversies in cardioembolic stroke.
Cardioembolic (CE) stroke mechanisms account for a significant number of ischemic strokes; however, the true burden is likely underestimated. It is critically important to identify patients with CE strokes because these individuals have high recurrence rates and represent a subgroup of patients who may benefit from targeted therapy in the form of anticoagulation or device based treatments. Current guidelines offer recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of these patients; however, important questions remain. First, appropriate cardiac testing in the setting of CE must be individualized and the optimal duration of electrocardiographic monitoring to rule out atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. Second, risk stratification tools for AF remain understudied, and there is controversy about which anticoagulant agents are most appropriate. Lastly, important potential CE sources of stroke such as patent foramen ovale have garnered significant attention recently, and debate regarding how to manage these patients persists. In this review, we discuss some of the important controversies in diagnosing and treating patients with possible CE stroke, pointing to areas where future research might be particularly valuable.
Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies (ICRHPS), Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, 800 Washington St, Box 63, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Benjamin S
BS
Wessler
David M
DM
Kent