Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought.
In the face of water stress, plants evolved with different abilities to limit the decrease in leaf water potential, notably in the daytime (ΨM). So-called isohydric species efficiently maintain high ΨM, whereas anisohydric species cannot prevent ΨM from dropping as soil water deficit develops. The genetic and physiological origins of these differences in (an)isohydric behaviours remain to be clarified. This is of particular interest within species such as Vitis vinifera L. where continuous variation in the level of isohydry has been observed among cultivars. With this objective, a 2 year experiment was conducted on the pseudo-F1 progeny from a cross between the two widespread cultivars Syrah and Grenache using a phenotyping platform coupled to a controlled-environment chamber. Potted plants of all the progeny were analysed for ΨM, transpiration rate, and soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance, under both well-watered and water deficit conditions. A high genetic variability was found for all the above traits. Four quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected for ΨM under water deficit conditions, and 28 other QTLs were detected for the different traits in either condition. Genetic variation in ΨM maintenance under water deficit weakly correlated with drought-induced reduction in transpiration rate in the progeny, and QTLs for both traits did not completely co-localize. This indicates that genetic variation in the control of ΨM under water deficit was not due simply to variation in transpiration sensitivity to soil drying. Possible origins of the diversity in (an)isohydric behaviours in grapevine are discussed on the basis of concurrent variations in soil-to-leaf hydraulic conductance and stomatal control of transpiration.
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Aude
A
Coupel-Ledru
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Éric
É
Lebon
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Angélique
A
Christophe
INRA UMR AGAP, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Agnès
A
Doligez
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Llorenç
L
Cabrera-Bosquet
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Philippe
P
Péchier
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Philippe
P
Hamard
INRA UMR AGAP, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Patrice
P
This
INRA Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Environnementaux, Place Viala, F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France simonnea@supagro.inra.fr.
Thierry
T
Simonneau
D055864:Droughts; D014644:Genetic Variation; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000502:physiology*; D018526:Plant Transpiration; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci; D027843:Vitis / Q000235:genetics*; D014867:Water / Q000502:physiology*
D014867:Water
Anisohydric; QTL; Vitis vinifera L.; drought; high-throughput phenotyping; hydraulic conductance; isohydric; leaf water potential; transpiration rate