Ambivalent journeys of hope: embryonic stem cell therapy in a clinic in India.
Stem cell therapy in non-Western countries such as India has received a lot of attention. Apart from media reports, there are a number of social science analyses of stem cell policy, therapy, and research, their ethical implications, and impact of advertising on patients. Nevertheless, in the media reports as well as in academic studies, experiences of patients, who undertake overseas journeys for stem cell therapy, have largely been either ignored or presented reductively, often as a "false hope." In this article, I analyze the experiences of patients and their "journeys of hope" to NuTech Mediworld, an embryonic stem cell therapy clinic in New Delhi, India. My analysis, which draws on my observations in the clinic and patients' experiences, instead of seeking to adjudicate whether embryonic stem cell therapy in clinics such as NuTech is right or wrong, true or false, focuses on how patients navigate and contest these concerns. I utilize Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's "concepts," lines of flight and deterritorialization, to highlight how embryonic stem cell therapy's "political economy of hope" embodies deterritorialization of several "regimes of truth" and how these deterritorializations impact patients' experiences.
University of Missouri, USA prasada@missouri.edu.
Amit
A
Prasad
D003219:Confidentiality; D053595:Embryonic Stem Cells; D065026:Hope; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D057193:Medical Tourism / Q000523:psychology*; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D012961:Sociology; D033581:Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000523:psychology*
India; embryonic stem cell therapy; hope; medical imaginary; medical tourism; patient’s experiences