Master apical file size - smaller or larger: a systematic review of microbial reduction.
The purpose of this systematic review was to determine, in patients undergoing root canal treatment, whether apical enlargement of canals affected microbial reduction. A PICO (population, intervention, comparison and outcome) strategy was developed to identify previously published studies dealing with apical size of canal and microbial reduction. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and PubMed databases were searched. Additionally, the bibliographies of all relevant articles and textbooks were manually searched. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently selected the relevant articles. Due to the variety of methodologies and different techniques used to measure outcome for master apical file enlargement, it was not possible to standardize the research data and to apply a meta-analysis. Seven articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Five of the seven articles generally concluded that canal enlargement reduced bioburden in the root canal system. Two articles reported no difference in canals enlarged to size 25 or 40. The results of the systematic review confirmed that more evidence-based research in this area is needed. With the limited information currently available, the best current available clinical evidence suggests that contemporary chemomechanical debridement techniques with canal enlargement techniques do not eliminate bacteria during root canal treatment at any size.
Department of Endodontics, Case School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
A
A
Aminoshariae
Dental School, UMKC, Kansas City, MO, USA.
J
J
Kulild
D003762:Dental Instruments; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity / Q000382:microbiology*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants; D018915:Root Canal Preparation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D019227:Tooth Apex
D012388:Root Canal Irrigants
apical enlargement; apical size; master apical file; microbial outcome; systematic review