A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone.
Evaluation of mandibular movements is necessary to form the occlusal anatomical contour, analyze the temporomandibular joint status, and evaluate the patient's occlusion. This clinical study was conducted to compare the mandibular recording device Cadiax Compact II with routine intraoral records for measuring condylar inclinations. The results showed that the differences between Cadiax and intraoral records were statistically significant for all measurements. Cadiax measurements had a stronger correlation with silicone records. The quantities of recorded Bennett angles were lower and the values of sagittal condylar inclination were higher with Cadiax than with routine intraoral records.
Kianoosh
K
Torabi
Sasan Rasaei
SR
Pour
Ahmad Hassan
AH
Ahangari
Safoura
S
Ghodsi
D000328:Adult; D016302:Centric Relation; D003199:Computer Systems; D003725:Dental Articulators; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D003766:Dental Occlusion; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007574:Jaw Relation Record / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D008335:Mandibular Condyle / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D003765:Models, Dental; D009068:Movement; D012828:Silicones / Q000737:chemistry; D014885:Waxes / Q000737:chemistry; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement / Q000737:chemistry
D003764:Dental Materials; D012828:Silicones; D014885:Waxes; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement