The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions.
The conflict monitoring hypothesis signals the need for cognitive controlThe Gratton effect is a key result attributed to the conflict monitoring hypothesisSome argue that controlling binding confounds eliminates the Gratton effect A Gratton effect remains in a vocal Stroop task after eliminating confounds The Gratton effect, the observation that the size of the Stroop effect is larger following a congruent trial compared to an incongruent trial, is one pivotal observation in support of the conflict-monitoring hypothesis. Previous reports have demonstrated that non-conflict components, such as feature binding, also contribute to this effect. Critically, Schmidt and De Houwer (2011) report a flanker task and a button-press Stroop task suggesting that there is no conflict adaptation in the Gratton effect; it is entirely caused by feature binding. The current investigation attempts to replicate and extend this important finding across two experiments using a canonical four-choice Stroop task with vocal responses. In contrast to Schmidt and De Houwer, we observe reliable conflict adaptation after controlling for feature binding. We argue that the overall strength of conflict is critical for determining whether a conflict adaptation component will remain in the Gratton effect after explaining binding components.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA ; Department of Communications, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA ; Center for Strategic Communication, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Chris
C
Blais
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Aikaterini
A
Stefanidi
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Gene A
GA
Brewer
Gratton effect; Stroop effect; cognitive control; cognitive control mechanisms; conflict adaptation; conflict monitoring; feature binding