Dimensions of self-rated health in older adults.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the association between negative self-rated health and indicators of health, wellbeing and sociodemographic variables in older adults.


METHODS
Cross-sectional study that used data from a population-based health survey with a probability cluster sample that was carried out in Campinas, SP, Southeastern Brazil,, in 2008 and 2009. The participants were older adults (≥ 60 years) and the dependent variable was self-rated health, categorized as: excellent, very good, good, bad and very bad. The adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated by means of Poisson multiple regression.


RESULTS
The highest prevalences of bad/very bad self-rated health were observed in the individuals who never attended school, in those with lower level of schooling, with monthly per capita family income lower than one minimum salary. Individuals who scored five or more in the physical health indicator also had bad self-rated health, as well as those who scored five or more in the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 and those who did not refer feeling happiness all the time.


CONCLUSIONS
The independent effects of material life conditions, physical and mental health and subjective wellbeing, observed in self-rated health, suggest that older adults can benefit by health policies supported by a global and integrative view of old age.
Flávia Silva Arbex
FS
Borim
Anita Liberalesso
AL
Neri
Priscila Maria Stolses Bergamo
PM
Francisco
Marilisa Berti de Azevedo
MB
Barros
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001938:Brazil; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D059026:Diagnostic Self Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires