Manipulating Morality: Third-Party Intentions Alter Moral Judgments by Changing Causal Reasoning.
The present studies investigate how the intentions of third parties influence judgments of moral responsibility for other agents who commit immoral acts. Using cases in which an agent acts under some situational constraint brought about by a third party, we ask whether the agent is blamed less for the immoral act when the third party intended for that act to occur. Study 1 demonstrates that third-party intentions do influence judgments of blame. Study 2 finds that third-party intentions only influence moral judgments when the agent's actions precisely match the third party's intention. Study 3 shows that this effect arises from changes in participants' causal perception that the third party was controlling the agent. Studies 4 and 5, respectively, show that the effect cannot be explained by changes in the distribution of blame or perceived differences in situational constraint faced by the agent.
Department of Psychology, Yale University.|Department of Philosophy, Yale University.
Jonathan
J
Phillips
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.
Alex
A
Shaw
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009014:Morals; D012919:Social Behavior; D055815:Young Adult
Causal chains; Causation; Intention; Manipulation; Morality