Satellite tagging and biopsy sampling of killer whales at subantarctic Marion Island: effectiveness, immediate reactions and long-term responses.
Remote tissue biopsy sampling and satellite tagging are becoming widely used in large marine vertebrate studies because they allow the collection of a diverse suite of otherwise difficult-to-obtain data which are critical in understanding the ecology of these species and to their conservation and management. Researchers must carefully consider their methods not only from an animal welfare perspective, but also to ensure the scientific rigour and validity of their results. We report methods for shore-based, remote biopsy sampling and satellite tagging of killer whales Orcinus orca at Subantarctic Marion Island. The performance of these methods is critically assessed using 1) the attachment duration of low-impact minimally percutaneous satellite tags; 2) the immediate behavioural reactions of animals to biopsy sampling and satellite tagging; 3) the effect of researcher experience on biopsy sampling and satellite tagging; and 4) the mid- (1 month) and long- (24 month) term behavioural consequences. To study mid- and long-term behavioural changes we used multievent capture-recapture models that accommodate imperfect detection and individual heterogeneity. We made 72 biopsy sampling attempts (resulting in 32 tissue samples) and 37 satellite tagging attempts (deploying 19 tags). Biopsy sampling success rates were low (43%), but tagging rates were high with improved tag designs (86%). The improved tags remained attached for 26±14 days (mean ± SD). Individuals most often showed no reaction when attempts missed (66%) and a slight reaction-defined as a slight flinch, slight shake, short acceleration, or immediate dive-when hit (54%). Severe immediate reactions were never observed. Hit or miss and age-sex class were important predictors of the reaction, but the method (tag or biopsy) was unimportant. Multievent trap-dependence modelling revealed considerable variation in individual sighting patterns; however, there were no significant mid- or long-term changes following biopsy sampling or tagging.
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ryan R
RR
Reisinger
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
W Chris
WC
Oosthuizen
Centre for Statistics in Ecology, Environment and Conservation, Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Guillaume
G
Péron
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Dawn
D
Cory Toussaint
School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America; Alaska SeaLife Center, Seward, Alaska, United States of America.
Russel D
RD
Andrews
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
P J Nico
PJ
de Bruyn
D000818:Animals; D001706:Biopsy / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D058998:Remote Sensing Technology / Q000379:methods*; D050685:Whale, Killer / Q000502:physiology*