title: The time-event correlation effect is due to temporal expectancy, not to partial transition costs.
abstract: Humans are sensitive to temporal redundancies in their environment. When the identity of a target stimulus is correlated with the duration of the preceding interval, performance is better for frequent than for infrequent combinations of target and interval. This effect has been demonstrated several times in current timing research. However, it can be accounted for by 2 starkly contrasting explanations. The standard account has explained it in terms of learning associations between intervals and stimulus-response events. But, alternatively the effect might be due to partial trial transition costs, because infrequent time-event combinations are proportionally more often partial transitions (i.e., transitions of either interval, or target). We conducted 3 choice response time experiments to distinguish between both explanations. The results clearly show that the time-event correlation effect is due to learning, not to partial transition costs.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University.
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thomaschke
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University.
authors.forename: Gesine
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Dreisbach
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D059031:Anticipation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult