title: Clinical performance of laminate and non-laminate resin composite restorations: a systematic review.
abstract: A systematic review was undertaken to determine the clinical outcomes of resin modified glass-ionomer cement or glass-ionomer cement-resin composite (RMGIC/GIC-RC) laminate restorations and flowable resin composite (FRC)-lined RC restorations compared to that of non-laminate RC restorations.
  
  
  
  Electronic databases were searched and filtered for relevant papers by assessing titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included, comparing the clinical performance of RMGIC/GIC-RC laminate restorations and FRC-lined restorations with RC restorations as the control. The articles were categorized and critically appraised. Raw data were used for a fixed effects meta-analysis.
  
  
  
  Thirteen articles were included in the review. Five evaluated FRC-lined restorations, and eight studies evaluated RMGIC/GIC-RC laminate restorations, comparing with non-laminate RC restorations. Three of eight RMGIC/GIC-RC laminate restorations assessed only postoperative sensitivity. A meta-analysis could only be conducted in three studies with the FRC-lined restorations as the intervention. The meta-analysis found no significant difference in clinical failures between FRC-lined RC restorations and RC restorations with no lining (p > 0.05).
  
  
  
  Based on current clinical evidence, a FRC lining is no more advantageous than RC restorations with no FRC lining. More long-term RCTs are required, particularly for evaluating RMGIC/GIC-RC laminate restorations.
authors.affiliation: Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.
authors.forename: K V
authors.initials: KV
authors.lastname: Nguyen
authors.affiliation: Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Sathorn
authors.affiliation: Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.
authors.forename: R H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.affiliation: Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria.
authors.forename: M F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Burrow
mesh_terms: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D006801:Humans; D011140:Polyurethanes
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins; C029012:Composite Dental Resin; D003188:Composite Resins; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D011140:Polyurethanes; C111840:flowable hybrid composite
keywords: Comparison; flowable resin composite; laminate restorations