title: Drawing conclusions: The effect of instructions on children's confabulation and fantasy errors.
abstract: Drawing is commonly used in forensic and clinical interviews with children. In these interviews, children are often allowed to draw without specific instructions about the purpose of the drawing materials. Here, we examined whether this practice influenced the accuracy of children's reports. Seventy-four 5- and 6-year-old children were interviewed one to two days after they took part in an interactive event. Some children were given drawing materials to use during the interview. Of these children, some were instructed to draw about the event, and some were given no additional instructions at all. Children who were instructed to draw about the event, or who were interviewed without drawing, made few errors. In contrast, children who drew without being given specific instructions reported more errors that were associated with both confabulation and fantasy. We conclude that, to maximise accuracy during interviews involving drawing, children should be directed to draw specifically about the interview topic.
authors.affiliation: a Department of Psychological Medicine , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Macleod
authors.affiliation: b Department of Psychology , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Julien
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gross
authors.affiliation: b Department of Psychology , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand.
authors.forename: Harlene
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hayne
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005201:Fantasy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall
keywords: Children; Drawing; Errors; Interview