title: Managing Evaluation: A Community Arts Organisation Perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Arts and health organisations must increasingly provide measurable evidence of impact to stakeholders, which can pose both logistical and ideological challenges. This paper examines the relationship between the ethos of an arts and health organisation with external demands for evaluation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Research involved an ethnographic engagement where the first author worked closely with the organisation for a year. In addition to informal discussions, twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with core staff and participants. Transcribed interviews were coded and emerging themes were identified.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Staff considered evaluation to be necessary and useful, yet also to be time consuming and a potential threat to their ethos. Nevertheless, they were able to negotiate the terms of evaluation to enable them to meet their own needs as well as those of funders and other stakeholders.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While not completely resisting outside demands for evaluation, the organisation was seen to intentionally rework demands for evidence into processes they felt they could work with, thus enabling their ethos to be maintained.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Medical Humanities and Department of Geography, Durham University.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Swan
authors.affiliation: Centre for Medical Humanities and Department of Geography, Durham University.
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Atkinson
keywords: arts and health; evaluation; outcomes; social enterprise; third sector