title: Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Insertions/deletions (indels) are the second most common type of genomic variant and the most common type of structural variant. Identification of indels in next generation sequencing data is a challenge, and algorithms commonly used for indel detection have not been compared on a research cohort of human subject genomic data. Guidelines for the optimal detection of biologically significant indels are limited. We analyzed three sets of human next generation sequencing data (48 samples of a 200 gene target exon sequencing, 45 samples of whole exome sequencing, and 2 samples of whole genome sequencing) using three algorithms for indel detection (Pindel, Genome Analysis Tool Kit's UnifiedGenotyper and HaplotypeCaller).
  
  
  RESULTS
  We observed variation in indel calls across the three algorithms. The intersection of the three tools comprised only 5.70% of targeted exon, 19.52% of whole exome, and 14.25% of whole genome indel calls. The majority of the discordant indels were of lower read depth and likely to be false positives. When software parameters were kept consistent across the three targets, HaplotypeCaller produced the most reliable results. Pindel results did not validate well without adjustments to parameters to account for varied read depth and number of samples per run. Adjustments to Pindel's M (minimum support for event) parameter improved both concordance and validation rates. Pindel was able to identify large deletions that surpassed the length capabilities of the GATK algorithms.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite the observed variability in indel identification, we discerned strengths among the individual algorithms on specific data sets. This allowed us to suggest best practices for indel calling. Pindel's low validation rate of indel calls made in targeted exon sequencing suggests that HaplotypeCaller is better suited for short indels and multi-sample runs in targets with very high read depth. Pindel allows for optimization of minimum support for events and is best used for detection of larger indels at lower read depths.
authors.affiliation: Center for Neural Development and Disease, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, USA. Dalia_Ghoneim@urmc.rochester.edu.
authors.forename: Dalia H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Ghoneim
authors.forename: Jason R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Myers
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Tuttle
authors.forename: Alex R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Paciorkowski
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D017353:Gene Deletion; D006801:Humans; D016254:Mutagenesis, Insertional; D017421:Sequence Analysis / Q000379:methods*