title: Chestnut, American (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.).
abstract: The key to successful transformation of American chestnut is having the correct combination of explant tissue, selectable markers, a very robust DNA delivery system, and a reliable regeneration system. The most important components of this transformation protocol for American chestnut are the following: starting out with rapidly dividing somatic embryos, treating the embryos gently throughout the Agrobacterium inoculation and cocultivation steps, doing the cocultivation step in desiccation plates, and finally transferring the embryos into temporary-immersion bioreactors for selection. None of these departures from standard Agrobacterium transformation protocols is sufficient by itself to achieve transgenic American chestnut, but each component makes a difference, resulting in a highly robust protocol. The average transformation efficiency that can be expected using the described protocol is approximately 170 stable embryogenic transformation events per gram of somatic embryo tissue, a considerable improvement over the 20 transformation events per gram we reported in 2006 (Maynard et al. American chestnut (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) Agrobacterium protocols, 2nd ed., 2006). We have regenerated nearly 100 of these events, containing 23 different gene constructs, into whole plants. As of the fall of 2013, we had a total of 1,275 transgenic chestnut trees planted at eight locations in New York State and one in Virginia. Based on a combination of field-trial inoculations, greenhouse small-stem inoculations, and detached-leaf assays, we have identified three transgenes that produce stronger resistance to chestnut blight than non-transgenic American chestnut. Depending on the transgene and the event, this resistance can be either intermediate between American chestnut and Chinese chestnut, approximately equal to or even higher than the resistance naturally found in Chinese chestnut.
authors.affiliation: Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 1 Forestry Dr., Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA, cmaynard@syr.edu.
authors.forename: Charles A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Maynard
authors.forename: Linda D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: McGuigan
authors.forename: Allison D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Oakes
authors.forename: Bo
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Andrew E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Newhouse
authors.forename: Lilibeth C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Northern
authors.forename: Allison M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Chartrand
authors.forename: Logan R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Will
authors.forename: Kathleen M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Baier
authors.forename: William A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Powell
mesh_terms: D000064:Acclimatization; D016960:Agrobacterium tumefaciens / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development; D018920:Coculture Techniques; D029962:Fagaceae / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000379:methods*; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000254:growth & development; D012639:Seeds / Q000254:growth & development; D014170:Transformation, Genetic