title: The politics of Golden Rice.
abstract: Genetic knowledge applicable to crop improvement has erupted over the past 60 years, and the techniques of introducing genes from one organism to another have enabled new varieties of crops not achievable by previously available methodologies of crop breeding. Research and particularly development of these GMO-crops to a point where they are useful for growers and consumers in most countries is subject to complex national and international rules arising out of the UN's Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, with 167 country signatories. (The USA and Canada are not signatories.) The Protocol was developed based on concerns initially expressed in the 1970's that such technology presented unusual risks to man and the environment. Those ideas have comprehensively and authoritatively been proven to be wrong. The Protocol has nevertheless spawned significant regulatory obstacles to the development of GMO-crop technology at great cost to global society and in conflict with many other UN objectives. The suspicion induced by the Protocol is also widely used, overtly or covertly, for political purposes. These points are illustrated by reference to the not-for-profit Golden Rice project.
authors.affiliation: a Executive Secretary; Golden Rice Humanitarian Board ; Switzerland.
authors.forename: Adrian
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dubock
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000235:genetics*; D012275:Oryza / Q000235:genetics*; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified / Q000235:genetics
keywords: Cartagena Protocol (CP); Convention on Biodiversity (CBD); GMO-crop; Golden Rice; Tufts University; regulation; vitamin A deficiency