title: Sterilization as last resort in women with intellectual disabilities: protection or disservice?
abstract: The legacy of the eugenics movement in the United States, including the involuntary sterilization of those deemed unfit to reproduce, has created a profound backlash against sterilization among certain populations. Particularly in treating women with intellectual disabilities, the field of obstetrics and gynecology has widely adopted an antisterilization stance. When treating women with intellectual disabilities, sterilization is generally considered a last resort. This essay revisits the issue of sterilization in women with intellectual disabilities, asking whether the field's stance of sterilization as a last resort is best viewed as a protection of this vulnerable population or one that actually does significant harm. We use a hypothetical but realistic patient case to examine the potential risks and benefits of sterilization. After reviewing the arguments against sterilization as a first-line treatment, we defend the controversial position that, in some cases, sterilization should be presented as an equally legitimate choice to reversible contraceptives.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
authors.forename: Iris
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Insogna
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: fiester@upenn.edu.
authors.forename: Autumn
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fiester
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability; D013245:Sterilization, Reproductive / Q000941:ethics
keywords: contraception; ethics; intellectual disability; sterilization