title: Quality improvement or research--deciding which road to take.
abstract: Critical care nurses are constantly challenged to provide safe, high-quality patient care at a low cost with increasingly scarce resources while implementing the latest evidence-based practices into their own clinical practice. This article is the first in a 4-part series to provide a practical quality improvement guide for critical care nurses interested in implementing system process or performance improvement projects within their own units. Part 1 is designed to answer the question "What method is better for measuring real-world patient outcomes-quality improvement or clinical research?" A broad overview of the differences between quality improvement and clinical research is provided. A newly published checklist to differentiate between attributes of each process is introduced, and readers can test their own knowledge between quality improvement and research with a quick quiz of studies recently published in Critical Care Nurse.
authors.affiliation: Julie M. Stausmire is an academic research coordinator at Mercy St Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio. julie_stausmire@mercy.com.
authors.forename: Julie M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Stausmire
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D064648:Critical Care Nursing / Q000592:standards*; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice; D006801:Humans; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000592:standards*