title: Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients' perceived burdens.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess patient-perceived process-related quality of care in patients undergoing different prosthodontic treatments, and to investigate whether perceived burdens are related to specific procedures during prosthodontic treatments, i.e., to specific treatment components.
  
  
  METHODS
  In this non-randomised prospective intervention study, 104 dental patients (mean age: 52.2±13.9 years, 50% female) were included. Burdens during treatments with fixed dental prostheses (FDP, n=90), removable dental prostheses (RDP, n=10), and complete dentures (CD; n=4) were assessed with the Burdens in Prosthetic Dentistry Questionnaire (BiPD-Q). The BiPD-Q total score was calculated as mean of all 25 items, and subscale scores were derived from items corresponding to six specific treatment components (anesthesia, preparation, impression, provisional care/try-in, fixation, global perception), with values ranging from 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Subscale scores were compared by using repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and effect sizes, to identify treatment components with highest burdens.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean BiPD-Q total score was 22.1, ranging from 8.6 for patients with CD to 24.0 for FDP patients. Perceived burdens differed significantly between treatment components, with highest burdens for anesthesia (score: 34.0), followed by preparation (score: 26.8) and impression (score: 24.7). When subscale score for anesthesia was compared to scores for other treatment components, effect sizes were medium to large.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While prosthodontic treatment is overall perceived as only moderately burdening, specific treatment components differ significantly in perceived burdens.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Anesthesia, preparation, and impression are treatment components with most unpleasant perceptions, offering the highest potential for improvements for patient-perceived process-related quality of care in prosthetic dentistry.
authors.affiliation: Department of Periodontology, University Medical Center Münster, Waldeyerstraße 30, 48149 Münster, Germany.
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hacker
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Guido
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Heydecke
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: d.reissmann@uke.de.
authors.forename: Daniel R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Reissmann
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000758:Anesthesia / Q000009:adverse effects*; D017266:Dental Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D003824:Denture, Complete / Q000009:adverse effects; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed / Q000009:adverse effects; D003832:Denture, Partial, Removable / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011476:Prosthodontics / Q000379:methods*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
keywords: Burdens; Patient perception; Prosthodontics; Quality of care; Treatment steps