title: Handedness differences observed in episodic memory retrieval do not extend to the domain of prospective memory.
abstract: A robust inconsistent handed advantage exists for episodic retrospective memory processes. The current study was undertaken to test whether this handedness difference extends to the domain of prospective memory (PM). Two studies, one based on a self-report measure (the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire) and the second involving a performance-based test (Memory for Intentions Screening Test), were carried out. Handedness effects were absent for both measures of PM. The absence of a handedness effect strongly suggests that PM processes are primarily characterized by executing intentions that depend on semantic networks for retrieval and do not necessarily rely on recalling spatio-temporal context, as is the case with episodic retrospective memory.
authors.affiliation: University of Toledo, United States.
authors.forename: Aparna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sahu
authors.affiliation: University of Toledo, United States. Electronic address: stephen.christman@utoledo.edu.
authors.forename: Stephen D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Christman
keywords: Episodic memory; Handedness; Individual differences; Intentions; Prospective memory