title: Mandatory reporting of impaired medical practitioners: protecting patients, supporting practitioners.
abstract: Taking action to protect patients from impaired colleagues is a long-standing ethical and professional obligation. In 2010, this responsibility was codified in law with the introduction, across Australia, of a new mandatory reporting regimen. While several concerns remain to be addressed, mandatory reporting has the potential not only to reinforce the primacy of patient safety, but also to open internal dialogue about the profession's response to concerns about practitioner health and well-being. Four years after the introduction of the scheme, key challenges include ensuring the reporting threshold is appropriately defined and clearly understood, improving access to evidence-based health programmes for practitioners, and strengthening upstream protections to prevent and minimise impairment at its roots.
authors.affiliation: School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Bismark
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Morris
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Clarke
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001315:Australia; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008007:Licensure, Medical / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019221:Mandatory Reporting / Q000941:ethics; D061214:Patient Safety / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010815:Physician Impairment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012944:Social Support; D035642:Whistleblowing / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
keywords: impairment; mandatory reporting; medical regulation; patient safety