title: Principles over principals? How innovation affects the agency relationship in medical and legal practice.
abstract: This Note outlines a conceptual framework for defining and analyzing innovation in the professional practice of medicine and law. The two professions have structural and historical similarities, and both are organized around the principal-agent relationship. Some types of professional activity adhere to the traditional agency model of principal-centered practice, but innovative professionals who develop novel tools and techniques often deviate from the agency model in interesting ways. This Note explores how that distinction plays out by identifying examples from academic medicine, public interest "cause lawyering", and corporate law. The field of medicine is governed by a regulatory regime that strictly differentiates routine practice from the experimental activities of clinical research, but the legal profession is governed by a monolithic code of conduct that does not explicitly acknowledge the types of innovation described here. Certain key events in the twentieth century help to explain why the government has chosen to tightly regulate innovation in medicine but not in law, and it turns out that innovators in both fields have found ways to stretch or bend the rules. These observations shed light on each profession's unique culture and can inform current debates over regulatory reform.
authors.forename: Julian J Z
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Polaris
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D033241:Lawyers; D008511:Medicine; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D011216:Practice Management, Medical; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D014481:United States