title: Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance?
abstract: We surveyed experts (N = 109) who conduct sexually violent predator (SVP) evaluations to obtain information about their Static-99R score reporting and interpretation practices. Although most evaluators reported providing at least 1 normative sample recidivism rate estimate, there were few other areas of consensus. Instead, reporting practices differed depending on the side for which evaluators typically performed evaluations. Defense evaluators were more likely to endorse reporting practices that convey the lowest possible level of risk (e.g., routine sample recidivism rates, 5-year recidivism rates) and the highest level of uncertainty (e.g., confidence intervals, classification accuracy), whereas prosecution evaluators were more likely to endorse practices suggesting the highest possible level of risk (e.g., high risk/need sample recidivism rates, 10-year recidivism rates). Reporting practices from state-agency evaluators tended to be more consistent with those of prosecution evaluators than defense evaluators, although state-agency evaluators were more likely than other evaluators to report that it was at least somewhat difficult to choose an appropriate normative comparison group. Overall, findings provide evidence for adversarial allegiance in Static-99R score reporting and interpretation practices.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Philosophy.
authors.forename: Caroline S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Chevalier
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Philosophy.
authors.forename: Marcus T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Boccaccini
authors.affiliation: Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia.
authors.forename: Daniel C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Murrie
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Philosophy.
authors.forename: Jorge G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Varela
mesh_terms: D057237:Criminals / Q000523:psychology*; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019221:Mandatory Reporting; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States