title: Lesion-Related Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting with Closed-Cell Design without Embolic Protection Devices in High-Risk Elderly Patients-Can This Concept Work Out? A Single Center Experience Focusing on Stent Design.
abstract: To compare the performance differences of three carotid artery stents in high-risk elderly patients without embolic protection devices (EPDs) on the basis of stent design, procedure-related complications, conveniences in handling, in-stent restenosis, 30-day outcome, and long-term follow-up. A total of 101 symptomatic internal carotid stenoses of 94 patients were prospectively treated with stent-protected angioplasty to 94 patients. Three closed-cell stents, one of those being hybrid cell design, were chosen depending on vascular anatomy: curved vessel, lesion length > 1 cm: 64 Carotid Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA); curved vessel, lesion length < 1 cm: 21 Cristallo Ideale (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy); straight vessel, lesion length > 1 cm: 16 Xact (Vascular Abbott, Santa Clara, CA). Comparisons of demographics, procedures, and outcomes were performed. The mean age of patients was 73.1 years (standard deviation [SD], ± 7.9; range, 58-87 years), 71% of the patients were older than 70 years and 20% were octogenarians. Male/female ratio was 3.1:1. About 13.9% (14/101) had contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion. Overall peri-interventional complication rate was 2.9% and 30-day mortality rate was 1%. During the long-term follow-up (34 months, range 1-59) no ipsilateral stroke was documented. Ten deaths (three after MI) were recognized. Two in-stent restenosis were detected (> 70% North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) during follow-up, one patient was detected with previous carotid endarterectomy. Especially, if individual anatomical variance is considered, lesion-related stent-protected carotid angioplasty with lesion-adapted closed-cell design is an effective, reliable, safe, and comprehensible treatment option in symptomatic patients. Even without EPDs, the rate of complications is low, when compared with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis described in the literature. In-stent restenosis seems to play no significant role in follow-up.
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Diakonissenhospital Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Silke
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hopf-Jensen
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Diakonissenhospital Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Leonardo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Marques
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Diakonissenhospital Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Preiß
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Diakonissenhospital Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Müller-Hülsbeck
keywords: CAS; carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; carotid stent; closed-cell design; lesion related; symptomatic