title: Payments, promotion, and the purple pill.
abstract: Understanding competition in the US drug market requires knowing how sensitive demand is to prices. The relevant prices for insured consumers are copayments. There are many studies of copayment elasticity in the health literature, but they are of limited applicability for studies of competition. Because of a paucity of data, such studies typically control for neither competitor copayment nor advertising. Whereas previous studies examined copayment sensitivity when copayments for branded drugs move in unison, this study examines copayment sensitivity when copayments diverge. This study uses unique panel data of insurance copayments and utilization for 77 insurance groups, as well as data on advertising. The results indicate that demand can be much more sensitive to copayment than previously recognized. Manufacturers selling drugs with higher copayments than branded competitors can lose substantial market share. Manufacturers can offset the loss of demand by increasing advertising to physicians, but it is costly.
authors.affiliation: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
authors.forename: David B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Ridley
mesh_terms: D017047:Cost Sharing / Q000191:economics*; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D007356:Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services / Q000191:economics*; D008389:Marketing of Health Services / Q000191:economics*; D017059:Models, Econometric
keywords: advertising; copayment; drug; elasticity; pharmaceutical; price