title: Should laptops be allowed in the classroom? Two viewpoints: viewpoint 1: laptops in classrooms facilitate curricular advancement and promote student learning and viewpoint 2: deconstructing and rethinking the use of laptops in the classroom.
abstract: This Point/Counterpoint article discusses the pros and cons of deploying one aspect of instructional technology in dental education: the use of laptops in the classroom. Two opposing viewpoints, written by different authors, evaluate the arguments. Viewpoint 1 argues that laptops in classrooms can be a catalyst for rapid curricular advancement and prepare dental graduates for the digital age of dentistry. As dental education is not limited to textual information, but includes skill development in spatial relationships and hands-on training, technology can play a transformative role in students' learning. Carefully implemented instructional technology can enhance student motivation when it transforms students from being the objects of teaching to the subjects of learning. Ubiquitous access to educational material allows for just-in-time learning and can overcome organizational barriers when, for instance, introducing interprofessional education. Viewpoint 2 argues that, in spite of widespread agreement that instructional technology leads to curricular innovation, the notion of the use of laptops in classrooms needs to be deconstructed and rethought when effective learning outcomes are sought. Analyzing the purpose, pedagogy, and learning product while applying lessons learned from K-12 implementation leads to a more complex picture of laptop integration in dental classrooms and forms the basis for questioning the value of such usage. For laptop use to contribute to student learning, rather than simply providing opportunity for students to take notes and access the Internet during class, this viewpoint emphasizes that dental educators need to think carefully about the purpose of this technology and to develop appropriate pedagogical strategies to achieve their objectives. The two viewpoints agree that significant faculty development efforts should precede any introduction of technology into the educational process and that technology alone cannot change education. While the first viewpoint emphasizes the pivotal role of technology in bringing dental education into the contemporary digital world, the second viewpoint focuses on challenges surrounding laptop usage in the classroom including the alignment of instructional methods with learning objectives.
authors.affiliation: Dr. Spallek is Associate Dean, Office of Faculty Affairs and Associate Professor, Dental Public Health, Center for Informatics in Oral Health Translational Research, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh. hspallek@pitt.edu.
authors.forename: Heiko
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Spallek
authors.affiliation: Dr. von Bergmann is Associate Professor in Education Research, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia. hsingchi.von.bergmann@ubc.ca.
authors.forename: HsingChi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: von Bergmann
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003162:Competency-Based Education; D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003479:Curriculum; D048048:Dental Informatics; D004497:Education, Dental; D018961:Educational Technology; D004526:Efficiency; D055094:Evidence-Based Dentistry / Q000193:education; D005179:Faculty, Dental; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007858:Learning; D008838:Microcomputers; D013192:Staff Development; D013335:Students, Dental; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods; D013850:Thinking
keywords: computers; decision support systems; dental education; educational technology; information systems; knowledge bases; student learning