title: Consensus and confusion in molluscan trees: evaluating morphological and molecular phylogenies.
abstract: Mollusks are the most morphologically disparate living animal phylum, they have diversified into all habitats, and have a deep fossil record. Monophyly and identity of their eight living classes is undisputed, but relationships between these groups and patterns of their early radiation have remained elusive. Arguments about traditional morphological phylogeny focus on a small number of topological concepts but often without regard to proximity of the individual classes. In contrast, molecular studies have proposed a number of radically different, inherently contradictory, and controversial sister relationships. Here, we assembled a data set of 42 unique published trees describing molluscan interrelationships. We used these data to ask several questions about the state of resolution of molluscan phylogeny compared with a null model of the variation possible in random trees constructed from a monophyletic assemblage of eight terminals. Although 27 different unique trees have been proposed from morphological inference, the majority of these are not statistically different from each other. Within the available molecular topologies, only four studies to date have included the deep sea class Monoplacophora; but 36.4% of all trees are not significantly different. We also present supertrees derived from two data partitions and three methods, including all available molecular molluscan phylogenies, which will form the basis for future hypothesis testing. The supertrees presented here were not constructed to provide yet another hypothesis of molluscan relationships, but rather to algorithmically evaluate the relationships present in the disparate published topologies. Based on the totality of available evidence, certain patterns of relatedness among constituent taxa become clear. The internodal distance is consistently short between a few taxon pairs, particularly supporting the relatedness of Monoplacophora and the chitons, Polyplacophora. Other taxon pairs are rarely or never found in close proximity, such as the vermiform Caudofoveata and Bivalvia. Our results have specific utility for guiding constructive research planning to better test relationships in Mollusca as well as other problematic groups. Taxa with consistently proximate relationships should be the focus of a combined approach in a concerted assessment of potential genetic and anatomical homology, whereas unequivocally distant taxa will make the most constructive choices for exemplar selection in higher level phylogenomic analyses.
authors.affiliation: Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, BT22 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK; and Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology and Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA j.sigwart@qub.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Julia D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Sigwart
authors.affiliation: Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, BT22 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK; and Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology and Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
authors.forename: David R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Lindberg
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D008974:Mollusca / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D010802:Phylogeny
keywords: Aculifera; Conchifera; Mollusca; Serialia; Testaria; supertree