title: Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Expandable screws have greater pullout strength than conventional screws. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability provided by a new built-in expandable anterior spinal fixation system with that of 2 commonly used anterior fixation systems, the Z-Plate and the Kaneda, in a porcine partial vertebral corpectomy model.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighteen porcine thoracolumbar spine specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 6 each. A vertebral wedge osteotomy was performed by removing the anterior 2/3 of the L1 vertebral body and the T15/L1 disc. Vertebrae were fixed with the Z-Plate, Kaneda, or expandable fixation system. The 3-dimensional spinal range of motion (ROM) of specimens in the intact state (prior to osteotomy), injured state (after osteotomy), and after internal fixation were recorded. The pullout strength and maximum torque of common anterior screws, the expandable anterior fixation screw unexpanded, and the expandable anterior fixation screw expanded was tested.
  
  
  RESULTS
  After internal fixation, the expandable device and Z-plate system exhibited higher left bending motion than the Kaneda system (5.50° and 5.37° vs. 5.04, p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively), and the Z-plate and Kaneda groups had significantly higher left axial and right axial rotation ROM as compared to the expandable device group (left axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.02° vs. 4.53°; right axial rotation: 5.23° and 5.08° vs. 4.49°). The maximum insertion torque of the expandable device was significantly greater than of a common screw (5.10 vs. 3.75 Ns). The maximum pullout force of the expandable device expanded was significantly higher than that of the common screw and the expandable device unexpanded (3,035.48 N vs. 1,827.38 N and 2,333.49 N).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The built-in anterior fixation system provides better axial rotational stability as compared to the other 2 systems, and greater maximum torque and pullout strength than a common fixation screw.
authors.forename: Chu-Song
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhi City, No 83 Speace West Street, Changzhi City, Shanxi 046000, People's Republic of China. 13268379376@qq.com.
authors.forename: Yan-Fang
authors.initials: YF
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Yu
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Zhong
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Hai
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lv
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D001860:Bone Plates / Q000592:standards; D001863:Bone Screws / Q000592:standards; D016268:Internal Fixators / Q000592:standards*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000502:physiology*; D008422:Materials Testing / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D011897:Random Allocation; D012399:Rotation; D013552:Swine; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae / Q000502:physiology*