title: [Is the standard retention of syndesmotic positioning screws after ankle fracture fixation safe and feasible? A retrospective cohort study in 140 consecutive patients at a North American trauma centre].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Unstable ankle injuries with associated disruption of the distal-fibular syndesmosis are typically managed by adjunctive placement of temporary syndesmotic positioning screws. The widespread notion that positioning screws must be removed by default after healing of the syndesmosis remains a topic of debate which lacks scientific support. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that syndesmotic positioning screws are safely retained per protocol in asymptomatic patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective analysis of an institutional prospective database was performed during a 5-year time-window at an academic level 1 trauma centre in the United States. All ankle fractures requiring surgical fixation were included in the analysis. The primary outcome parameter consisted of the rate of elective hardware removal for syndesmotic positioning screws within 6 months after surgical fixation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 496 consecutive patients with 496 isolated ankle fractures managed by surgical fixation were included in this study. Of these, 140 injuries were managed by placement of syndesmotic positioning screws. Within 6 months follow-up, 17.1% of all syndesmotic screws were found to be radiographically broken, and 13.6% of syndesmotic screws revealed radiographic signs of loosening. Only 2 patients (1.4%) required the elective removal of symptomatic positioning screws within 6 months of surgical fracture fixation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite the high rate of radiographic complications related to breaking or loosening of syndesmotic screws in almost one third of all cases, more than 98% of all patients remain asymptomatic and do not require a scheduled hardware removal. The routine removal of syndesmotic positioning screws does not appear to be justified from a patient safety perspective.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, United States.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Weckbach
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, United States.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hahnhaussen
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, United States.
authors.forename: J T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Losacco
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gebhard
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, United States.
authors.forename: P F
authors.initials: PF
authors.lastname: Stahel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D064386:Ankle Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D016512:Ankle Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D001863:Bone Screws; D015331:Cohort Studies; D020878:Device Removal; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014193:Trauma Centers; D014481:United States