title: The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
abstract: Some issues in medical ethics have been present throughout the history of medicine, and thus provide us with an opportunity to ascertain: (1) whether there is progress in medical ethics; and (2) what it means to do good medical ethics. One such perennial issue is physician assistance in dying (PAD). This paper provides an account of the PAD debate in this journal over the last 40 years. It concludes that there is some (but limited) progress in the debate. The distinctions, analogies and hypothetical examples have proliferated, as have empirical studies, but very little has changed in terms of the basic arguments. The paper further argues that many of the contributions to the debate fail to engage fully with the concerns people have about the legal introduction of PAD in the healthcare system, perhaps because many of the contributions sit on the borderline between academic analysis and social activism.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Medical Ethics, HELSAM, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Centre for Ethics in Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
authors.forename: Søren
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Holm
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence
keywords: Physician assistance in dying; conscientious objection; euthanasia; method in medical ethics; physician assisted suicide; progress in medical ethics