title: "Real-world" practical evaluation strategies: a review of telehealth evaluation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Currently, the increasing interest in telehealth and significant technological breakthroughs of the past decade create favorable conditions for the widespread adoption of telehealth services. Therefore, expectations are high that telehealth can help alleviate prevailing challenges in health care delivery. However, in order to translate current research to policy and facilitate adoption by patients and health care providers, there is need for compelling evidence of the effectiveness of telehealth interventions. Such evidence is gathered from rigorously designed research studies, which may not always be practical in many real-world settings.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Our aim was to summarize current telehealth evaluation strategies and challenges and to outline practical approaches to conduct evaluation in real-world settings using one of our previously reported telehealth initiatives, the Diabetes Connect program, as a case study.
  
  
  METHODS
  We reviewed commonly used current evaluation frameworks and strategies, as well as best practices based on successful evaluative efforts to date to address commonly encountered challenges in telehealth evaluation. These challenges in telehealth evaluation and commonly used frameworks are described relevant to the evaluation of Diabetes Connect, a 12-month Web-based blood glucose monitoring program.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Designers of telehealth evaluation frameworks must give careful consideration to the elements of planning, implementation, and impact assessment of interventions. Evaluating performance at each of these phases is critical to the overall success of an intervention. Although impact assessment occurs at the end of a program, our review shows that it should begin at the point of problem definition. Critical to the success of an evaluative strategy is early planning that involves all stakeholders to identify the overall goals of the program and key measures of success at each phase of the program life cycle. This strategy should enable selection of an appropriate evaluation strategy and measures to aid in the ongoing development and implementation of telehealth and provide better evidence of program impact.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We recommend a pragmatic, multi-method, multi-phase approach to telehealth evaluation that is flexible and can be adapted to the characteristics and challenges unique to each telehealth program.
authors.affiliation: Partners Healthcare Center for Connected Health, Boston, MA, United States. sagboola@partners.org.
authors.forename: Stephen
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2161-8091
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Agboola
authors.forename: Timothy M
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-465X
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Hale
authors.forename: Caitlin
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0901-1518
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Masters
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7517-2291
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kvedar
authors.forename: Kamal
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-8002
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Jethwani
keywords: diabetes mellitus; eHealth; evaluation; evaluation framework; technology; telehealth