title: Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to demonstrate that robotically assisted laparoscopy for aortic lymph node dissection was improved when double docking (DD) of the Da Vinci system is used for combined surgical procedures [defined by the combination of a pelvic procedure and a para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL)].
  
  
  METHODS
  From February 2007 to February 2013, 41 patients underwent combined procedures including PAL up to the left renal vein in 2 cancer centers. We used 2 different approaches as follows: a single docking (SD) of the Da Vinci system (transperitoneal PAL and pelvic surgery) during the first period (22 patients) and a DD during the second period (19 patients). We recorded retrospectively the lymph node count (main criteria), operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We observed a statistical difference between SD and DD concerning aortic lymph node count (5.86 vs 10.89, P < 0.005). Operative time is longer in the DD group (326.1 vs 239.4 minutes, P < 0.05). No difference was observed concerning estimated blood loss. Hospital stay was longer in the DD group (4.9 vs 3.2 days, P < 0.05). Only 1 conversion to open was described in the SD group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In our experience of robotically assisted laparoscopy, when PAL is combined to a pelvic procedure, the use of a DD seems to improve aortic lymph node count.Despite a longer operative time compared to SD, DD seems to be a good solution to combine the advantages of robotic assistance to our quality criteria of aortic dissection.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We compare 2 techniques to realize robotic assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy combined with pelvic procedure. Double docking seems to improve histological results compared to single docking.
authors.affiliation: Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille cedex, France.
authors.forename: Oona
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Franké
authors.forename: Fabrice
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Narducci
authors.forename: Elisabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Chereau-Ewald
authors.forename: Marion
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Orsoni
authors.forename: Camille
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jauffret
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Leblanc
authors.forename: Gilles
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Houvenaeghel
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lambaudie
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001011:Aorta; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008875:Middle Aged; D061646:Operative Time; D056888:Patient Positioning / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D010388:Pelvis / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D065287:Robotic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*