title: Re: Coster et al.: A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study (Ophthalmology 2014;121:979-87).
authors.affiliation: Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: jsomner@googlemail.com.
authors.forename: John E A
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Somner
authors.affiliation: Ipswich General hospital, Ipswich, UK.
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hardman-Lea
authors.affiliation: Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
authors.forename: Rupert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bourne
authors.affiliation: University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Burr
authors.affiliation: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D003316:Corneal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D057111:Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015948:Keratoplasty, Penetrating / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012042:Registries / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*