title: Who would students ask for help in academic cheating? Cross-sectional study of medical students in Croatia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Academic cheating does not happen as an isolated action of an individual but is most often a collaborative practice. As there are few studies that looked at who are collaborators in cheating, we investigated medical students' readiness to engage others in academic dishonest behaviours.
  
  
  METHODS
  In a cross-sectional survey study in Zagreb, Croatia, 592 medical students from the first, 3rd and 6th (final) study year anonymously answered a survey of readiness to ask family, friends, colleagues or strangers for help in 4 different forms of academic cheating or for 2 personal material favours. Stepwise multiple linear regression models (MLR) were used to evaluate potential factors influencing propensity for engaging others in these two types of behaviour.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Many students would ask another person for help in academic cheating, from 88.8% to 26.9% depending on a cheating behaviour. Students would most often ask a family member or friend for help in academic cheating. The same "helpers" were identified for non-academic related behaviour - asking for personal material favours. More respondents, however, would include three or four persons for asking help in academic cheating than for routine material favours. Score on material favours survey was the strongest positive predictor of readiness for asking help in academic cheating (stepwise MLR model; beta = 0.308, P < 0.0001) followed by extrinsic motivation (compensation) and male gender, whereas intrinsic motivation, year of study and grade point average were weak negative predictors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study indicates that medical students are willing to engage more than one person in either close or distant relationships in academic cheating. In order to develop effective preventive measures to deter cheating at medical academic institutions, factors surrounding students' preference towards academic cheating rather than routine favours should be further investigated.
authors.forename: Varja
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Đogaš
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jerončić
authors.forename: Matko
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Marušić
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Marušić
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D017523:Croatia; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D008192:Deception; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010865:Pilot Projects; D028743:Professional Misconduct / Q000941:ethics; D012577:Schools, Medical; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult