title: Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The rise of social media and microblogging platforms in recent years, in conjunction with the development of techniques for the processing and analysis of "big data", has provided significant opportunities for public health surveillance using user-generated content. However, relatively little attention has been focused on developing ethically appropriate approaches to working with these new data sources.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Based on a review of the literature, this study seeks to develop a taxonomy of public health surveillance-related ethical concepts that emerge when using Twitter data, with a view to: (1) explicitly identifying a set of potential ethical issues and concerns that may arise when researchers work with Twitter data, and (2) providing a starting point for the formation of a set of best practices for public health surveillance through the development of an empirically derived taxonomy of ethical concepts.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched Medline, Compendex, PsycINFO, and the Philosopher's Index using a set of keywords selected to identify Twitter-related research papers that reference ethical concepts. Our initial set of queries identified 342 references across the four bibliographic databases. We screened titles and abstracts of these references using our inclusion/exclusion criteria, eliminating duplicates and unavailable papers, until 49 references remained. We then read the full text of these 49 articles and discarded 36, resulting in a final inclusion set of 13 articles. Ethical concepts were then identified in each of these 13 articles. Finally, based on a close reading of the text, a taxonomy of ethical concepts was constructed based on ethical concepts discovered in the papers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From these 13 articles, we iteratively generated a taxonomy of ethical concepts consisting of 10 top level categories: privacy, informed consent, ethical theory, institutional review board (IRB)/regulation, traditional research vs Twitter research, geographical information, researcher lurking, economic value of personal information, medical exceptionalism, and benefit of identifying socially harmful medical conditions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In summary, based on a review of the literature, we present a provisional taxonomy of public health surveillance-related ethical concepts that emerge when using Twitter data.
authors.affiliation: University of California San Diego, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, La Jolla, CA, United States. mike.conway@utah.edu.
authors.forename: Mike
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-8108
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Conway
mesh_terms: D002965:Classification; D016206:Databases, Bibliographic; D004989:Ethics; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods; D020407:Internet / Q000941:ethics*; D016239:MEDLINE / Q000941:ethics; D062486:Public Health Surveillance / Q000379:methods*; D061108:Social Media / Q000941:ethics*
keywords: ethics; social media; twitter messaging