title: U.S. national PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks-CSN and IMPROVE: description of networks.
abstract: The US. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) initiated the national PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Network (CSN) in 2000 to support evaluation of long-term trends and to better quantify the impact of sources on particulate matter (PM) concentrations in the size range below 2.5 μm aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5; fine particles). The network peaked at more than 260 sites in 2005. In response to the 1999 Regional Haze Rule and the need to better understand the regional transport of PM, EPA also augmented the long-existing Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) visibility monitoring network in 2000, adding nearly 100 additional IMPROVE sites in rural Class 1 Areas across the country. Both networks measure the major chemical components of PM2.5 using historically accepted filter-based methods. Components measured by both networks include major anions, carbonaceous material, and a series of trace elements. CSN also measures ammonium and other cations directly, whereas IMPROVE estimates ammonium assuming complete neutralization of the measured sulfate and nitrate. IMPROVE also measures chloride and nitrite. In general, the field and laboratory approaches used in the two networks are similar; however, there are numerous, often subtle differences in sampling and chemical analysis methods, shipping, and quality control practices. These could potentially affect merging the two data sets when used to understand better the impact of sources on PM concentrations and the regional nature and long-range transport of PM2zs. This paper describes, for the first time in the peer-reviewed literature, these networks as they have existed since 2000, outlines differences infield and laboratory approaches, provides a summary of the analytical parameters that address data uncertainty, and summarizes major network changes since the inception of CSN. Implications: Two long-term chemical speciation particle monitoring networks have operated simultaneously in the United States since 2001, when the EPA began regular operations of its PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Network (IMPROVE began in 1988). These networks use similar field sampling and analytical methods, but there are numerous, often subtle differences in equipment and methodologies that can affect the results. This paper describes these networks since 20000 (inception of CSN) and their differences, and summarizes the analytical parameters that address data uncertainty, providing researches and policymakers with background information they may need (e.g., for 2018 PM2.5 designation and State Implementation Plan process; McCarthy, 2013) to assess results from each network and decide how these data sets can be mutually employed for enhanced analyses. Changes in CSN and IMPROVE that have occurred over the years also are described.
authors.affiliation: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV, USA. solomon.paul@epa.gov
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Solomon
authors.forename: Dennis
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Crumpler
authors.forename: James B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Flanagan
authors.forename: R K M
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Jayanty
authors.forename: Ed E
authors.initials: EE
authors.lastname: Rickman
authors.forename: Charles E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: McDade
mesh_terms: D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D010316:Particle Size; D052638:Particulate Matter / Q000032:analysis*; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency
chemical_list: D000393:Air Pollutants; D052638:Particulate Matter