title: Microbial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection Due to Implant Insertion Maneuvers: Cross-Sectional Study 5 Years Postloading in Healthy Patients.
abstract: The aim of this study was to test if stress on the prosthetic connection during insertion maneuvers can induce micro-warping at the implant connection. From September 2011 to July 2013, patients with implants loaded for at least 5 years that were placed with 2 different insertion implant mounters-MP (conventional) and ME (mountless)-were selected from all of those who had received dental implant therapy in the past and were attending routine check-up or spontaneous visits during the study period. Samples were obtained from inside the connection and the abutment surface using absorbent sterile paper tips. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed for total bacterial counts and loads of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Tannerella forsythensis (Tf), Treponema denticola (Td), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Peptostreptococcus micros (Pm), Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Campylobacter rectus (Cr), Eikenella corrodens (Ec), and Candida albicans (Ca). The analysis of variance test was used to test for differences. Nine patients (20 implants) were included in the MP group and 5 patients (10 implants) in the ME group. Regarding the red complex, Tf was seen in 80% and 30% of MP and ME implants, respectively (P < .001). Significant differences were also found in microbial load. For Td, proportions were 45% vs 10% (P = .022), with no significant differences at load levels. Regarding the orange complex, higher prevalence values were found in MP implants, although differences were nonsignificant. Microbial load levels for orange complex bacteria were higher for MP than ME, and these differences were statistically significant for Fn (4.94 vs 3.09; P = .001). Finally, Ec was detected only in the MP group, and Ca and Aa were not found in either group. Within its limitation (small sample size, retrospective analysis, indirect measurement method), the present study suggests that a mounter not affecting the prosthetic connection should be used to reduce microbial contamination of implants.
authors.affiliation: 1  Oral Surgery Unit, Stomatology Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Peñarrocha-Oltra
authors.affiliation: 2  Independent researcher, private practice in prosthodontics, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
authors.forename: Paulo H O
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Rossetti
authors.affiliation: 3  Istituto Stomatologico Toscano, Viareggio, Italy.
authors.forename: Ugo
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Covani
authors.affiliation: 4  Independent researcher, private practice, Lecce, Italy.
authors.forename: Federica
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Galluccio
authors.affiliation: 5  Independent researcher, private practice, Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Luigi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Canullo
mesh_terms: D016976:Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans / Q000302:isolation & purification; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D015921:Dental Implants / Q000382:microbiology; D006801:Humans; D016966:Porphyromonas gingivalis / Q000302:isolation & purification; D018713:Prevotella intermedia / Q000302:isolation & purification; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D048373:Treponema denticola / Q000302:isolation & purification
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants
keywords: biomechanics; implant connection deformation; implant-prosthetic prognosis; titanium abutment