title: A physiological perspective on fixational eye movements.
abstract: For a behavioral neuroscientist, fixational eye movements are a double-edged sword. On one edge, they make control of visual stimuli difficult, but on the other edge they provide insight into the ways the visual system acquires information from the environment. We have studied macaque monkeys as models for human visual systems. Fixational eye movements of monkeys are similar to those of humans but they are more often vertically biased and spatially more dispersed. Eye movements scatter stimuli from their intended retinal locations, increase variability of neuronal responses, inflate estimates of receptive field size, and decrease measures of response amplitude. They also bias against successful stimulation of extremely selective cells. Compensating for eye movements reduced these errors and revealed a fine-grained motion pathway from V1 feeding the cortical ventral stream. Compensation is a useful tool for the experimenter, but rather than compensating for eye movements, the brain utilizes them as part of its input. The saccades and drifts that occur during fixation selectively activate different types of V1 neurons. Cells that prefer slower speeds respond during the drift periods with maintained discharges and tend to have smaller receptive fields that are selective for sign of contrast. They are well suited to code small details of the image and to enable our fine detailed vision. Cells that prefer higher speeds fire transient bursts of spikes when the receptive field leaves, crosses, or lands on a stimulus, but only the most transient ones (about one-third of our sample) failed to respond during drifts. Voluntary and fixational saccades had very similar effects, including the presence of a biphasic extraretinal modulation that interacted with stimulus-driven responses. Saccades evoke synchronous bursts that can enhance visibility but these bursts may also participate in the visual masking that contributes to saccadic suppression. Study of the small eye movements of fixation may illuminate some of the big problems in vision.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, United States. Electronic address: max.snodderly@austin.utexas.edu.
authors.forename: D Max
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Snodderly
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008251:Macaca; D023421:Models, Animal; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Extraretinal modulation; Eye position; Gaze-contingent stimulation; Motion selectivity; Receptive field; Saccadic suppression