title: Names of infamy: tainted eponyms.
abstract: The use of eponyms is controversial. A distinction must be made between those doctors and scientists after whom disorders and syndromes are named in honour of their discoveries, and those whose discoveries were made as a result of maltreatment of defenceless prisoners, utilizing specimens from victims of Nazi extermination policies, and euthanasia victims of racial policies. The second group of scientists should have their names expunged from the historical record, and their deeds brought to the attention of their colleagues. We are not however advocating the abolition of eponyms in general, only tainted ones.
authors.affiliation: University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine and Neurosciences, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3150, Australia. Electronic address: frank.vajda@mh.org.au.
authors.forename: F J E
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Vajda
authors.affiliation: University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine and Neurosciences, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3150, Australia.
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Davis
authors.affiliation: Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Byrne
mesh_terms: D004850:Eponyms; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D028683:National Socialism; D010820:Physicians
keywords: Eponyms; Honorific names; Major discoveries; Nazi crimes; Unethical research