title: Testing the applicability of six macroscopic skeletal aging techniques on a modern Southeast Asian sample.
abstract: Most macroscopic skeletal aging techniques used by forensic anthropologists have been developed and tested only on reference material from western populations. This study examined the performance of six aging techniques on a known age sample of 88 Southeast Asian individuals. Methods examined included the Suchey-Brooks method of aging the symphyseal face of the os pubis (Brooks and Suchey, Hum. Evol. 5 (1990) 227), Buckberry and Chamberlain's, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 119 (2002) 231 and Osborne et al.'s, J. Forensic Sci. 49 (2004) 1 revisions of the Lovejoy et al., Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68 (1985) 15 method of aging the auricular surface of the ilium, İşcan et al.'s, J. Forensic Sci. 29 (1984) 1094, İşcan et al.'s, J. Forensic Sci. 30 (1985) 853 method of aging the sternal end of the fourth rib, and Meindl and Lovejoy's, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68 (1985) 57 methods for aging both lateral-anterior and vault sutures on the cranium. The results of this study indicate that application of aging techniques commonly used in forensic anthropology to individuals identified as Asian, and more specifically Southeast Asian, should not be undertaken injudiciously. Of the six individual methods tested here, the Suchey-Brooks pubic symphysis aging method performs best, though average age estimates were still off by nearly 10 years or greater. Methods for aging the auricular surface perform next best, though the Osborne et al. method works better for individuals below 50 years and the Buckberry and Chamberlain method works better for those above 50 years. Methods for age estimation from the sternal ends of the fourth rib and vault and lateral-anterior cranial sutures perform poorly and are not recommended for use on remains of Southeast Asian ancestry. Combining age estimates from multiple indicators, specifically the pubic symphysis and one auricular surface method, was superior to individual methods. Data and a worked example are provided for calculating the conditional probability that an individual belongs to a particular age decade, though overall age estimates may still be broad.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States; Division of Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: gocha.3@osu.edu.
authors.forename: Timothy P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Gocha
authors.affiliation: Central Identification Laboratory, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, Hickam AFB, HI 96853, United States.
authors.forename: Megan E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Ingvoldstad
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kolatorowicz
authors.affiliation: Central Identification Laboratory, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, Hickam AFB, HI 96853, United States.
authors.forename: Meghan-Tomasita J
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Cosgriff-Hernandez
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
authors.forename: Paul W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Sciulli
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000365:Age Determination by Skeleton / Q000379:methods*; D000368:Aged; D044466:Asian People; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D018732:Forensic Anthropology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013785:Thailand; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Conditional probability; Forensic anthropology; Forensic anthropology population data; Human aging variability; Skeletal age estimation; Southeast Asia