title: The impact of commonly used air filters in eliminating the exposure to secondhand smoke constituents.
abstract: Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) also known as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been well established scientifically as a human health hazard. Despite this and warnings from health agencies, concerns over the economic impact of smoke-free bans have limited political resolve to enact these regulations. Arguments against smoke-free bans include the contention that air filters can eliminate the health risks from SHS exposure. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of air filters (MERV 4 and MERV 8) commonly used in homes and businesses in reducing the concentrations of total suspended particulates, fine particles and carbon monoxide from SHS as a measure of their potential to reduce the toxicity associated with SHS exposure. Our results demonstrate that these filters are not effective at reducing carbon monoxide levels or PM 2.5, which have been correlated with human health toxicity/disease. Thus, our findings, from a public health perspective, do not support the use of common air filters as a viable alternative to smoke-free bans.
authors.affiliation: Department of Agriculture, Nutrition and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, MS 0202, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, USA. pritsos@cabnr.unr.edu.
authors.forename: Chris A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Pritsos
authors.forename: Thivanka
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Muthumalage
mesh_terms: D061808:Air Filters; D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D011634:Public Health; D012907:Smoking; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000032:analysis* / Q000517:prevention & control
chemical_list: D000393:Air Pollutants; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution