title: Do medical student stress, health, or quality of life foretell step 1 scores? A comparison of students in traditional and revised preclinical curricula.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  We explored the theory that measures of medical students' well-being and stress from different types of preclinical curricula are linked with performance on standardized assessment.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Self-reported stress and quality of life among sophomore medical students having different types of preclinical curricula will vary in their relationships to USMLE Step 1 scores.
  
  
  METHODS
  Voluntary surveys in 2010 and 2011 compared self-reported stress, physical and mental health, and quality of life with Step 1 scores for beginning sophomore students in the final year of a traditional, discipline-based curriculum and the 1st year of a revised, systems-based curriculum with changed grading system. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Spearman rank correlations were used to analyze data, significant at p <.05.
  
  
  RESULTS
  New curriculum students reported worse physical health, subjective feelings, leisure activities, social relationships and morale, and more depressive symptoms and life stress than traditional curriculum students. However, among curriculum-related stressors, few differences emerged; revised curriculum sophomores reported less stress working with real and standardized patients than traditional students. There were no class differences in respondents' Step 1 scores. Among emotional and physical health measures, only feelings of morale correlated negatively with Step 1 performance. Revised curriculum students' Step 1 scores correlated negatively with stress from difficulty of coursework.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although revised curriculum students reported worse quality of life, general stress, and health and less stress from patient interactions than traditional students, few measures were associated with performance differences on Step 1. Moreover, curriculum type did not appear to either hinder or help students' Step 1 performance. To identify and help students at risk for academic problems, future assessments of correlates of Step 1 performance should be repeated after the new curriculum is well established, relating them also to performance on other standardized assessments of communication skills, professionalism, and later clinical evaluations in clerkships or internships.
authors.affiliation: a Department of Psychiatry at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center , Oklahoma City , Oklahoma , USA.
authors.forename: Phebe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Tucker
authors.forename: Haekyung
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Jeon-Slaughter
authors.forename: Ugur
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Sener
authors.forename: Megan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Arvidson
authors.forename: Andrey
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Khalafian
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003479:Curriculum; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000639:trends*; D004521:Educational Measurement; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011788:Quality of Life; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000523:psychology*; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
keywords: USMLE Step 1; health; medical curriculum; stress; well-being