title: Special topic: Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures--does evidence give us the answer?
abstract: Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft are rare, high-energy injuries that typically occur in young polytrauma patients. The associated fracture of the neck is often vertical in nature and is more frequently non-displaced than in isolated femoral neck fractures. Historically the diagnosis of an associated femoral neck fracture was delayed or missed in approximately one third of cases. Studies have shown that detection can be significantly improved with the implementation of a protocolized approach to hip imaging in all patients with femoral shaft fractures. Prompt recognition of an associated femoral neck fracture allows for timely stabilization and may decrease the risks of non-union and avascular necrosis. In contrast, failure to recognize a non-displaced or minimally displaced associated neck fracture prior to fixation of the shaft can lead to displacement, a decrease in neck fixation options, a technically challenging secondary procedure and increased risk of long-term sequelae. A vast array of treatment strategies have been described for this combined injury. Published options range from spica casting to open reduction and internal fixation of both fractures and include almost all conceivable combinations in between. While timely surgical stabilization is now universally recommended for both shaft and neck, no consensus exists as to the most appropriate method of fixation for either fracture. Most authors recommend prompt, but not emergent, surgery with priority given to anatomic reduction and stabilization of the neck fracture by either closed or open methods. Fixation of the shaft fracture follows as patient condition allows. The rare nature of this injury makes it very challenging to study and most published series' are retrospective with very small sample sizes. In short, no scientificallycompelling study is available to definitively support any one implant choice or method of stabilzation over another for the treatment of associated fractures of the femoral neck and shaft.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Orthopaedic Traumatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
authors.forename: Christina L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Boulton
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Orthopaedic Traumatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States. Electronic address: apollak@umoa.umm.edu.
authors.forename: Andrew N
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Pollak
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D042241:Early Diagnosis; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005264:Femoral Fractures / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D005265:Femoral Neck Fractures / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D005271:Femur Head Necrosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000379:methods; D005599:Fractures, Ununited / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D009104:Multiple Trauma / Q000150:complications* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
keywords: Femoral; Ipsilateral; Neck; Pauwels; Reconstruction nail; Retrograde; Shaft