title: Continual feeding of two types of microalgal biomass affected protein digestion and metabolism in laying hens.
abstract: A 14-wk study was conducted to determine the nutritional efficacy and ssmetabolic impact of 2 types of microalgal biomass as alternative protein sources in laying hen diets. Shaver hens (total = 150 and 26 wk old) were fed 1 of 5 diets: a control or a defatted green microalgal biomass (DG; Desmodesmus spp.) at 25% and a full-fatted diatom biomass (FD; Staurosira spp.) at 11.7% inclusion with or without protease. This experiment consisted of 5 replicates per treatment and each replicate contained 6 hens individually reared in cages (1 hen for biochemical data/replicate). Despite decreased ADFI (P = 0.03), hens fed DG or FD had final BW, overall hen-day egg production, and egg quality similar to the controls. Feeding DG or FD did not alter plasma concentrations of insulin, glutamine, and uric acid or alkaline phosphatase activity at wk 8 or 14 but decreased plasma 3-methyhistine concentrations (P = 0.03) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activities (P < 0.001) at wk 14 and improved (P = 0.002) ileal total AA digestibility. Although DG or FD exhibited moderate effects on intestinal brush border protease activities and mRNA levels of duodenal transporters Pept1, Lat1, and Cat1, both substantially enhanced (P < 0.05) phosphorylation of hepatic protein synthesis key regulator S6 ribosomal protein (S6) and the ratio of phospho-S6 to S6 in the liver of hens. However, DG and FD manifested with different impacts on weights of egg and egg albumen, proteolytic activity of jejunal digesta, plasma TRAP activity, ileal total AA digestibility, and several intestinal genes and hepatic proteins. Supplemental protease in the DG and FD diets produced mixed effects on a number of measures. In conclusion, our findings revealed the feasibility of including greater levels of microalgal biomass as a source of feed protein for laying hens and a novel potential of the biomass in improving dietary protein digestion and body protein metabolism than previously perceived.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Ekmay
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Chou
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Magnuson
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 XL20@cornell.edu.
authors.forename: X G
authors.initials: XG
authors.lastname: Lei
mesh_terms: D000596:Amino Acids; D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D018533:Biomass; D002645:Chickens / Q000502:physiology*; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary*; D004044:Dietary Proteins / Q000378:metabolism; D004063:Digestion / Q000502:physiology*; D004531:Eggs / Q000592:standards; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000187:drug effects*; D005260:Female; D058086:Microalgae; D010058:Oviposition; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases; D059748:Proteolysis
chemical_list: D000596:Amino Acids; D004044:Dietary Proteins; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases
keywords: egg; hens; metabolism; microalgae; protein