title: Robotic vs. Standard Laparoscopic Technique - What is Better?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Laparoscopic surgery is subject to certain limitations that can be a problem when performing complex minimally invasive operations. Robotic surgery was developed precisely to overcome such technical limitations. The question therefore arises whether robotic surgery leads to significantly better results compared with standard laparoscopic surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Based on comparative systematic reviews and meta-analyses, this paper examines whether the robotic technique when used for abdominal and visceral surgery procedures confers advantages on the patient compared with the standard laparoscopic technique.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Even for demanding visceral surgery procedures, the perioperative complication rate for robotic surgery is not higher than for open or laparoscopic surgical procedures. In cancer cases, the oncological accuracy of robotic resection for gastric, pancreatic, and rectal resection is seen to be adequate. Only the operating time is generally longer than for standard laparoscopic and open procedures. But, on the other hand, in some procedures blood loss is less, conversion rates are lower and hospital stay shorter.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To evaluate the future role of the robotic technique for visceral surgery, high-quality prospective randomized trials are urgently needed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Berlin, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School , Berlin , Germany.
authors.forename: Ferdinand
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Köckerling
keywords: laparoscopic surgery; meta-analysis; oncological surgery; robotic surgery; systematic review