title: Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection.
abstract: Conservation outcomes are principally achieved through the protection of intact habitat or the restoration of degraded habitat. Restoration is generally considered a lower priority action than protection because protection is thought to provide superior outcomes, at lower costs, without the time delay required for restoration. Yet while it is broadly accepted that protected intact habitat safeguards more biodiversity and generates greater ecosystem services per unit area than restored habitat, conservation lacks a theory that can coherently compare the relative outcomes of the two actions. We use a dynamic landscape model to integrate these two actions into a unified conservation theory of protection and restoration. Using nonlinear benefit functions, we show that both actions are crucial components of a conservation strategy that seeks to optimise either biodiversity conservation or ecosystem services provision. In contrast to conservation orthodoxy, in some circumstances, restoration should be strongly preferred to protection. The relative priority of protection and restoration depends on their costs and also on the different time lags that are inherent to both protection and restoration. We derive a simple and easy-to-interpret heuristic that integrates these factors into a single equation that applies equally to biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service objectives. We use two examples to illustrate the theory: bird conservation in tropical rainforests and coastal defence provided by mangrove forests.
authors.affiliation: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Imperial College London, Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park, Berkshire, England, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Hugh P
authors.initials: HP
authors.lastname: Possingham
authors.affiliation: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bode
authors.affiliation: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Carissa J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Klein
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001893:Borneo; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D010239:Paraguay; D065947:Rainforest; D053833:Wetlands