title: Self-assessment through videotaping compared with peer and trainer feedback.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess and compare three different types of feedback for presentation skills, self, peer and trainer feedback.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Faculty of Medicine at Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey, from March 2012 to December 2012.
  
  
  METHODS
  Participants were faculty members and instructor nurses. Each participant gave a 10-minute presentation, which was rated by peers, course trainers and the presenter himself/herself using a thirteen-item questionnaire (designed as a 5-point Likert scale). Peers and trainers conducted the assessment during the presentation while the self-assessment was done later by watching a video recording of the presentation. Comparison of the points between the groups was made using the two-way ANOVA. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the mean scores of self-assessment, peer and trainer assessment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Ten faculty members, 27 instructor nurses and 4 trainers participated in the study. A total of 775 feedback reports were collected for 37 participants. There was no significant difference between the feedback scores of the evaluators as well as the occupation groups (p > 0.05). There was a strong positive and statistically significant correlation between trainer and peer (r = 0.73, p < 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Consequently, there were no differences in the evaluations of presentation skills between different stakeholders. Trainers should use the video recording method to self-evaluate their presentation skills, and they should invite their peers from time to time to improve their own personal development by using peer review methods.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Education, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
authors.forename: Ummu Zeynep
authors.initials: UZ
authors.lastname: Avsar
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Education, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
authors.forename: Zeliha
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Cansever
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Education, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
authors.forename: Hamit
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Acemoglu
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
authors.forename: Umit
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Avsar
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, King Faisal University, KSA.
authors.forename: Abdul Sattar
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Khan
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Medicine, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey.
authors.forename: Yasemin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Cayir
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods; D005178:Faculty; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007721:Knowledge of Results, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010379:Peer Group; D012647:Self-Assessment; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*; D014421:Turkey; D014743:Videotape Recording