title: Evaluation of anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with food wastes via bio-methane potential assay and CSTR reactor.
abstract: The introduction of food wastes into anaerobic digestion (AD) brings a promising scenario of increasing feedstock availability and overall energy production from AD. This study evaluated the biodegradability and methane potential from co-digestion of two typical food wastes, kitchen waste and chicken fat, with dairy manure. For single substrate, the bio-methane potential assays showed that kitchen waste had the highest methane yield of 352 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS added, 92% more than dairy manure alone. Chicken fat at the same Volatile Solid (VS) level (2 g L(-1)) inhibited bio-methane production. Addition of kitchen waste and chicken fat to a VS percentage of up to 40% improved overall methane yield by 44% and 34%, respectively. Synergistic effect was observed when either combining two or three substrates as AD feedstock, possibly as a result of increased biodegradability of organic materials in chicken fat and kitchen waste compared with dairy manure. Addition of chicken fat improved methane yield more than kitchen waste. However, addition of chicken fat VS over 0.8 g L(-1) should be cautiously done because it may cause reactor failure due to decrease in pH. The maximum methane yield was 425 L-CH4 kg(-1)-VS, achieved at a VS ratio of 2:2:1 for kitchen waste, chicken fat, and dairy manure. Results from batch AD experiment demonstrated that supplementing dairy manure to chicken fat and/or kitchen waste improved alkalinity of substrate due to the inclusion of more titratable bases in dairy manure, and therefore stabilized the methanogenesis and substantially improved biogas yield. A mixture of substrates of kitchen waste, chicken fat, and dairy manure at a ratio of 1:1:3 was fed to a continuously stirred tank reactor operated at organic loading rates of 3.28, 6.55, and 2.18 g-COD L(-1)-day (hydraulic retention time of 20, 10, and 30 days, respectively) under mesophilic condition, and methane production rate reached 0.65, 0.95, and 0.34 L-CH4 L(-1)-reactor-day.
authors.affiliation: a Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering , University of Minnesota , St. Paul , Minnesota , USA.
authors.forename: Yulin
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Ye
authors.forename: Carlos
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zamalloa
authors.forename: Hongjian
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: Mi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Yan
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: Bo
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Hu
mesh_terms: D000693:Anaerobiosis; D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000378:metabolism*; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D056804:Biofuels / Q000032:analysis; D019149:Bioreactors; D002645:Chickens; D004063:Digestion; D008372:Manure / Q000032:analysis* / Q000382:microbiology; D008697:Methane / Q000032:analysis* / Q000378:metabolism; D012037:Refuse Disposal / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D014866:Waste Products / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D056804:Biofuels; D008372:Manure; D014866:Waste Products; D008697:Methane
keywords: Co-digestion; bio-methane potential (BMP); chicken fat; food waste; kitchen waste; synergistic effect