title: The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
abstract: The conjunction fallacy refers to situations when a person judges a conjunction to be more likely than one of the individual conjuncts, which is a violation of a key property of classical probability theory. Recently, quantum probability (QP) theory has been proposed as a coherent account of these and many other findings on probability judgment "errors" that violate classical probability rules, including the conjunction fallacy. Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013) presented an alternative account of the conjunction fallacy based on the concept of inductive confirmation. They presented new empirical findings consistent with their account, and they also claimed that these results were inconsistent with the QP theory account. This comment proved that our QP model for the conjunction fallacy is completely consistent with the main empirical results from Tentori et al. (2013). Furthermore, we discuss experimental tests that can distinguish the 2 alternative accounts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University.
authors.forename: Jerome R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Busemeyer
authors.affiliation: School of Communication, Ohio State University.
authors.forename: Zheng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, City University London.
authors.forename: Emmanuel M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Pothos
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine.
authors.forename: Jennifer S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Trueblood
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011336:Probability; D011340:Problem Solving