title: Patients' perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe patients' perceived value and use of quality measures in evaluating and choosing community pharmacies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Focus group methodology was combined with a survey tool. During the focus groups, participants assessed the value of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance's quality measures in evaluating and choosing a pharmacy. Also, participants completed questionnaires rating their perceived value of quality measures in evaluating a pharmacy (1 being low value and 5 being high) or choosing a pharmacy (yes/no). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the focus groups and surveys, respectively.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semistructured focus groups were conducted in a private meeting space of an urban and a rural area of a Mid-western State in the USA.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-four adults who filled prescription medications in community pharmacies for a chronic illness were recruited in community pharmacies, senior centres and public libraries.
  
  
  RESULTS
  While comments indicated that all measures were important, medication safety measures (eg, drug-drug interactions) were valued more highly than others. Rating of quality measure utility in evaluating a pharmacy ranged from a mean of 4.88 ('drug-drug interactions') to a mean of 4.0 ('absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma'). Patients were hesitant to use quality information in choosing a pharmacy (depending on the participant's location) but might consider if moving to a new area or having had a negative pharmacy experience. Use of select quality measures to choose a pharmacy ranged from 97.1% of participants using 'drug-drug interactions' (medication safety measure) to 55.9% using 'absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma'.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The study participants valued quality measures in evaluating and selecting a community pharmacy, with medication safety measures valued highest. The participants reported that the quality measures would not typically cause a switch in pharmacy but might influence their selection in certain situations.
authors.affiliation: Division of Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
authors.forename: Olayinka O
authors.initials: OO
authors.lastname: Shiyanbola
authors.affiliation: Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
authors.forename: Jane R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Mort
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003157:Community Pharmacy Services / Q000592:standards*; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004347:Drug Interactions; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010594:Pharmacies / Q000592:standards*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States
keywords: Community Pharmacy; Patient Perceptions; Quality Measures; Value