title: Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Urinary incontinence is common after radical prostatectomy and can also occur in some circumstances after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Conservative management includes pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback, electrical stimulation, extra-corporeal magnetic innervation (ExMI), compression devices (penile clamps), lifestyle changes, or a combination of methods.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the effectiveness of conservative management for urinary incontinence up to 12 months after transurethral, suprapubic, laparoscopic, radical retropubic or perineal prostatectomy, including any single conservative therapy or any combination of conservative therapies.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (5 February 2014), CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1), EMBASE (January 2010 to Week 3 2014), CINAHL (January 1982 to 18 January 2014), ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (both searched 29 January 2014), and the reference lists of relevant articles.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating conservative interventions for urinary continence in men after prostatectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two or more review authors assessed the methodological quality of the trials and abstracted data. We tried to contact several authors of included studies to obtain extra information.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty trials met the inclusion criteria, 45 in men after radical prostatectomy, four trials after TURP and one trial after either operation. The trials included 4717 men of whom 2736 had an active conservative intervention. There was considerable variation in the interventions, populations and outcome measures. Data were not available for many of the pre-stated outcomes. Men's symptoms improved over time irrespective of management.There was no evidence from eight trials that pelvic floor muscle training with or without biofeedback was better than control for men who had urinary incontinence up to 12 months after radical prostatectomy; the quality of the evidence was judged to be moderate (for example 57% with urinary incontinence in the intervention group versus 62% in the control group, risk ratio (RR) for incontinence after 12 months 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.22). One large multi-centre trial of one-to-one therapy showed no difference in any urinary or quality of life outcome measures and had narrow CIs. It seems unlikely that men benefit from one-to-one PFMT therapy after TURP. Individual small trials provided data to suggest that electrical stimulation, external magnetic innervation, or combinations of treatments might be beneficial but the evidence was limited. Amongst trials of conservative treatment for all men after radical prostatectomy, aimed at both treatment and prevention, there was moderate evidence of an overall benefit from pelvic floor muscle training versus control management in terms of reduction of urinary incontinence (for example 10% with urinary incontinence after one year in the intervention groups versus 32% in the control groups, RR for urinary incontinence 0.32, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.51). However, this finding was not supported by other data from pad tests. The findings should be treated with caution because the risk of bias assessment showed methodological limitations. Men in one trial were more satisfied with one type of external compression device, which had the lowest urine loss, compared to two others or no treatment. The effect of other conservative interventions such as lifestyle changes remained undetermined as no trials involving these interventions were identified.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The value of the various approaches to conservative management of postprostatectomy incontinence after radical prostatectomy remains uncertain. The evidence is conflicting and therefore rigorous, adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which abide by the principles and recommendations of the CONSORT statement are still needed to obtain a definitive answer. The trials should be robustly designed to answer specific well constructed research questions and include outcomes which are important from the patient's perspective in decision making and are also relevant to the healthcare professionals. Long-term incontinence may be managed by an external penile clamp, but there are safety problems.
authors.affiliation: Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
authors.forename: Coral A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: Muhammad Imran
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Omar
authors.forename: Susan E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: Kathleen F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Hunter
authors.forename: June D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Cody
authors.forename: Cathryn M A
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Glazener
mesh_terms: D001676:Biofeedback, Psychology; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy / Q000379:methods; D007172:Erectile Dysfunction / Q000534:rehabilitation; D005081:Exercise Therapy / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D055909:Magnetic Field Therapy / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D017773:Pelvic Floor; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*