title: Are Nucleated Cell Counts Useful in the Diagnosis of Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Evaluating for the possibility of prosthetic joint infection in the setting of periprosthetic fracture is important because it determines the course of treatment. However, fracture-related inflammation can make investigations used in the diagnosis of infection less reliable.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of our study was to evaluate synovial fluid nucleated cell counts as a diagnostic test for deep prosthetic infection in patients with periprosthetic fractures around hip and knee arthroplasties. Specifically, we wished to determine the test's properties (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) using threshold levels of nucleated cell counts as they are otherwise used in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.
  
  
  METHODS
  Billing codes were used to identify all cases of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the femur, and ORIF of the tibia at our institution between 2005 and 2013. A total of 2537 charts were identified and reviewed to reveal 269 patients with 269 periprosthetic fractures about a THA or TKA (10.6% of charts reviewed). Of these, 27 fractures in 27 patients (10% of the periprosthetic fractures identified) underwent aspiration of their total joint arthroplasty to rule out infection before surgical intervention. The decision to aspirate was made by the treating surgeon based on clinical suspicion of infection from the patient history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. Nucleated cell counts from joint aspirates were recorded for all 27 patients. Synovial fluid culture results were then used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of an elevated nucleated cell count in the diagnosis of infection.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The specificity, sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of an elevated nucleated cell count in the diagnosis of infection were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI, 34.94-75.57]), 100% (95% CI, 19.29-100), 18% (95% CI, 2.37-45.46), and 100% (95% CI, 76.66-100), respectively. Eleven of 27 patients (41%) with joint aspirates had elevated nucleated cell counts. Only two of the 11 patients (18%) with elevated nucleated cell counts had positive synovial fluid cultures. None of the patients with normal nucleated cell counts had positive synovial fluid cultures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although quite common, an elevated nucleated cell count has moderate specificity and poor PPV in the diagnosis of infection in the setting of periprosthetic fracture.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level IV, therapeutic study.
authors: London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6G 2V4, Canada, spresto6@gmail.com.
authors: Stephen
authors: S
authors: Preston
authors: Lyndsay
authors: L
authors: Somerville
authors: Brent
authors: B
authors: Lanting
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Howard
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002452:Cell Count; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D057068:Periprosthetic Fractures / Q000150:complications*; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013582:Synovial Fluid / Q000166:cytology*
references: Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;45(9):1113-9
references: 17918072
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90(8):1637-43
references: 18676892
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1869-75
references: 18762646
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):128-33
references: 19122087
references: J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):722-7
references: 18789633
references: J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Nov;17(11):677-88
references: 19880678
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2238-43
references: 20162386
references: J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Sep;11(3):135-41
references: 20661762
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):2992-4
references: 21938532
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 5;96(5):430-6
references: 24599206
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jul;89(7):1409-16
references: 17606776
references: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120(10):570-4
references: 11110138
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Mar;(420):80-95
references: 15057082
references: Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Oct;35(4):485-92, vi
references: 15363923
references: Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:293-304
references: 7797866
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):132-9
references: 8895629
references: Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;30(2):183-90
references: 10196420
references: Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;30(2):209-14
references: 10196422
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1215-22
references: 16757753
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88 Suppl 4:138-47
references: 17142443
references: Injury. 2007 Jun;38(6):651-4
references: 17477925
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Aug;461:44-7
references: 17452914