title: Comparing theories' performance in predicting violence.
abstract: The stakes of choosing the best theory as a basis for violence prevention and offender rehabilitation are high. However, no single theory of violence has ever been universally accepted by a majority of established researchers. Psychiatry, psychology and sociology are each subdivided into different schools relying upon different premises. All theories can produce empirical evidence for their validity, some of them stating the opposite of each other. Calculating different models with multivariate logistic regression on a dataset of N = 21,312 observations and ninety-two influences allowed a direct comparison of the performance of operationalizations of some of the most important schools. The psychopathology model ranked as the best model in terms of predicting violence right after the comprehensive interdisciplinary model. Next came the rational choice and lifestyle model and third the differential association and learning theory model. Other models namely the control theory model, the childhood-trauma model and the social conflict and reaction model turned out to have low sensitivities for predicting violence. Nevertheless, all models produced acceptable results in predictions of a non-violent outcome.
authors: Departement of Psychology, University of Zürich, Switzerland. Electronic address: henriette.haas@psychologie.uzh.ch.
authors: Henriette
authors: H
authors: Haas
authors: Ecole de criminology, Université de Montréal, Canada.
authors: Maurice
authors: M
authors: Cusson
mesh_terms: D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012307:Risk Factors; D014754:Violence / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
keywords: Cross-sectional study; Performance; Prediction; Psychopathology; Theories; Violence