title: Incongruity between affinity patterns based on mandibular and lower dental dimensions following the transition to agriculture in the Near East, Anatolia and Europe.
abstract: While it has been suggested that malocclusion is linked with urbanisation, it remains unclear as to whether its high prevalence began 8,000 years earlier concomitant with the transition to agriculture. Here we investigate the extent to which patterns of affinity (i.e., among-population distances), based on mandibular form and dental dimensions, respectively, match across Epipalaeolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic samples from the Near East/Anatolia and Europe. Analyses were conducted using morphological distance matrices reflecting dental and mandibular form for the same 292 individuals across 21 archaeological populations. Thereafter, statistical analyses were undertaken on four sample aggregates defined on the basis of their subsistence strategy, geography, and chronology to test for potential differences in dental and mandibular form across and within groups. Results show a clear separation based on mandibular morphology between European hunter-gatherers, European farmers, and Near Eastern transitional farmers and semi-sedentary hunter-gatherers. In contrast, the dental dimensions show no such pattern and no clear association between the position of samples and their temporal or geographic attributes. Although later farming groups have, on average, smaller teeth and mandibles, shape analyses show that the mandibles of farmers are not simply size-reduced versions of earlier hunter-gatherer mandibles. Instead, it appears that mandibular form underwent a complex series of shape changes commensurate with the transition to agriculture that are not reflected in affinity patterns based on dental dimensions. In the case of hunter-gatherers there is a correlation between inter-individual mandibular and dental distances, suggesting an equilibrium between these two closely associated morphological units. However, in the case of semi-sedentary hunter-gatherers and farming groups, no such correlation was found, suggesting that the incongruity between dental and mandibular form began with the shift towards sedentism and agricultural subsistence practices in the core region of the Near East and Anatolia.
authors: Earth Institute and School of Archaeology, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
authors: Ron
authors: R
authors: Pinhasi
authors: Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel.
authors: Vered
authors: V
authors: Eshed
authors: Department of Anthropology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
authors: Noreen
authors: N
authors: von Cramon-Taubadel
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture; D001106:Archaeology; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D008877:Middle East; D014070:Tooth / Q000033:anatomy & histology*
references: Science. 1982 Oct 1;218(4567):74-6
references: 7123221
references: Angle Orthod. 1981 Jan;51(1):61-9
references: 6939354
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Jan;63(1):39-56
references: 6422767
references: Am J Orthod. 1984 Nov;86(5):419-26
references: 6594064
references: Eur J Orthod. 1986 May;8(2):91-7
references: 3459665
references: Arch Oral Biol. 1989;34(10):839-41
references: 2692543
references: Hum Biol. 1990 Feb;62(1):5-25
references: 2323770
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;Suppl 37:47-61
references: 14666533
references: J Hum Evol. 2004 Jun;46(6):655-77
references: 15183669
references: Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209-20
references: 6018555
references: Am J Hum Genet. 1967 Jul;19(4):543-53
references: 4382497
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Jul;82(3):257-65
references: 2375378
references: Angle Orthod. 1994;64(2):89-98
references: 8010527
references: J Hum Evol. 1998 Apr;34(4):333-60
references: 9595356
references: Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97-106
references: 9743642
references: Br J Orthod. 1999 Jun;26(2):103-13
references: 10420244
references: J Dent Res. 1957 Feb;36(1):39-47
references: 13398501
references: Am J Orthod. 1961 Jun;47:406-22
references: 13716844
references: J Dent Res. 1956 Feb;35(1):115-31
references: 13286395
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Jun;130(2):145-59
references: 16353225
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008 Feb;135(2):136-48
references: 18046779
references: Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009 Jun;30(5):292-300
references: 19514263
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011 Aug;145(4):615-28
references: 21702003
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19546-51
references: 22106280
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 22;280(1767):20131337
references: 23902904
references: PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80771
references: 24278319
references: Am J Orthod. 1971 Oct;60(4):344-54
references: 5284438
references: Angle Orthod. 1973 Oct;43(4):412-21
references: 4517974
references: Am J Orthod. 1981 Mar;79(3):250-62
references: 6938135
references: Am J Orthod. 1982 Jan;81(1):38-42
references: 6960695