title: An approach for prioritizing "down-the-drain" chemicals used in the household.
abstract: Many chemicals are present in cleaning and personal care products, which after use are washed down the drain and find their way into water bodies, where they may impact the environment. This study surveyed individuals to determine what products were used most in the home, in an attempt to prioritize which compounds may be of most concern. The survey resulted in the identification of 14 categories of products consisting of 315 specific brands. The survey estimated that individuals each discharge almost 33 L of products per year down the drain. Dishwashing liquids and hand wash gels, which accounted for 40% of this volume, were selected for identification of specific ingredients. Ingredients were classified as surfactants, preservatives, fragrances or miscellaneous, with hand wash gels having a wider range of ingredients than dishwashing liquids. A review of the literature suggested that preservatives, which are designed to be toxic, and fragrances, where data on toxicity are limited, should be prioritized. The approach undertaken has successfully estimated use and provisionally identified some classes of chemicals which may be of most concern when used in cleaning and personal care products.
authors: Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. m_rotsidou@hotmail.com.
authors: Marina
authors: M
authors: Rotsidou
authors: Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK. mark.scrimshaw@brunel.ac.uk.
authors: Mark D
authors: MD
authors: Scrimshaw
mesh_terms: D006795:Household Products / Q000032:analysis*; D006801:Humans; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014865:Waste Disposal, Fluid; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical
references: Water Res. 2008 Jul;42(13):3498-518
references: 18514758
references: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Aug 15;407(17):4787-98
references: 19505713
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 May;46(5):1516-24
references: 18243463
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Feb;43(2):279-91
references: 15621341
references: Sci Total Environ. 2012 Feb 1;416:137-41
references: 22209400
references: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Nov 23;1508(1-2):235-51
references: 11090828
references: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Dec;107 Suppl 6:907-38
references: 10592150
references: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Apr;20(4):2456-71
references: 22945655
references: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006 May;64(1):85-99
references: 16439022
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;45(9):3858-64
references: 21524137
references: Chemosphere. 2011 Mar;82(11):1518-32
references: 21185057
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Dec;44(12):2008-18
references: 16920244
references: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2007 Jan;14 Suppl 1:44-52
references: 21959540
references: Contact Dermatitis. 2011 May;64(5):265-72
references: 21138445
references: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007 Dec 15;225(3):255-66
references: 17889917
references: Environ Int. 2006 Apr;32(3):417-31
references: 16125241
references: Sci Total Environ. 2012 Oct 15;437:363-72
references: 22960111
references: J Chromatogr A. 2008 May 9;1190(1-2):253-62
references: 18374930
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Feb;49(2):408-22
references: 21093525
references: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;153(1):12-9
references: 9875295