title: The question of autonomy in maternal health in Africa: a rights-based consideration.
abstract: Maternal mortality is still very high in Africa, despite progress in control efforts at the global level. One elemental link is the question of autonomy in maternal health, especially at the household level where intrinsic human rights are undermined. A rights-based consideration in bioethics is an approach that holds the centrality of the human person, with a compelling reference to the fundamental human rights of every person. A philosophical and sociological engagement of gender and the notion of autonomy within the household reveals some fundamental rights-based perplexities for bioethical considerations in maternal health. The right to self-determination is undermined, and therefore women's dignity, freedom and autonomy, capacities, and choices are easily defiled. This study applies a rights-based approach to maternal health and demonstrates how rights concerns are associated with negative outcomes in maternal health in Africa. The discussion is situated at the household level, which is the starting point in health care. The paper submits that beyond legal and political rights within the context of the state, rights-based issues manifest at the household level. Many of those rights issues, especially relating to women's autonomy, are detrimental to maternal health in Africa. Therefore, a rights-based approach in the social construction of maternal health realities will contribute to alleviating the burden of maternal mortality in Africa.
authors: Department of Sociology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria, greatjoa@yahoo.co.uk.
authors: Jimoh
authors: J
authors: Amzat
mesh_terms: D000349:Africa; D003906:Developing Countries; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D005610:Freedom; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D000068097:Maternal Health; D008428:Maternal Mortality; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D028723:Personhood; D011247:Pregnancy; D014933:Women's Rights
references: Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Mar;16(1):145-57
references: 22783678
references: PLoS One. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e69569
references: 23936047
references: BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1297-8
references: 14656808
references: Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(1):65-80
references: 20845830
references: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jul;49(2):197-214
references: 10414829
references: Reprod Health Matters. 2010 Nov;18(36):158-70
references: 21111360
references: Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Oct;32(5):363-74
references: 21822955
references: J Health Soc Behav. 1985 Sep;26(3):156-82
references: 3905939
references: PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1000429
references: 21483715
references: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):190-3
references: 23395448
references: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jan 17;12:4
references: 22251749
references: Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;16(3):123-9
references: 23437506
references: Malawi Med J. 2009 Jun;21(2):51-3
references: 20345003
references: World Health Popul. 2011;12(3):42-51
references: 21677528
references: Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Winter;4(1):44-55
references: 7627365
references: Dev World Bioeth. 2011 Dec;11(3):136-45
references: 22103637
references: Soc Sci Med. 2000 Sep;51(6):931-9
references: 10972436
references: Soc Sci Med. 2009 Sep;69(6):926-33
references: 19656604
references: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Apr;105(1):78-81
references: 19201403
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Nov 1;67(11):953-9
references: 23929617
references: Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):77-81
references: 18769668
references: Econ Hum Biol. 2003 Jan;1(1):105-21
references: 15463967
references: Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(3):235-44
references: 12517031