title: Investigating the accuracy of microstereotactic-body-radiotherapy utilizing anatomically accurate 3D printed rodent-morphic dosimeters.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Sophisticated small animal irradiators, incorporating cone-beam-CT image-guidance, have recently been developed which enable exploration of the efficacy of advanced radiation treatments in the preclinical setting. Microstereotactic-body-radiation-therapy (microSBRT) is one technique of interest, utilizing field sizes in the range of 1-15 mm. Verification of the accuracy of microSBRT treatment delivery is challenging due to the lack of available methods to comprehensively measure dose distributions in representative phantoms with sufficiently high spatial resolution and in 3 dimensions (3D). This work introduces a potential solution in the form of anatomically accurate rodent-morphic 3D dosimeters compatible with ultrahigh resolution (0.3 mm(3)) optical computed tomography (optical-CT) dose read-out.
  
  
  METHODS
  Rodent-morphic dosimeters were produced by 3D-printing molds of rodent anatomy directly from contours defined on x-ray CT data sets of rats and mice, and using these molds to create tissue-equivalent radiochromic 3D dosimeters from Presage. Anatomically accurate spines were incorporated into some dosimeters, by first 3D printing the spine mold, then forming a high-Z bone equivalent spine insert. This spine insert was then set inside the tissue equivalent body mold. The high-Z spinal insert enabled representative cone-beam CT IGRT targeting. On irradiation, a linear radiochromic change in optical-density occurs in the dosimeter, which is proportional to absorbed dose, and was read out using optical-CT in high-resolution (0.5 mm isotropic voxels). Optical-CT data were converted to absolute dose in two ways: (i) using a calibration curve derived from other Presage dosimeters from the same batch, and (ii) by independent measurement of calibrated dose at a point using a novel detector comprised of a yttrium oxide based nanocrystalline scintillator, with a submillimeter active length. A microSBRT spinal treatment was delivered consisting of a 180° continuous arc at 225 kVp with a 20 × 10 mm field size. Dose response was evaluated using both the Presage/optical-CT 3D dosimetry system described above, and independent verification in select planes using EBT2 radiochromic film placed inside rodent-morphic dosimeters that had been sectioned in half.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Rodent-morphic 3D dosimeters were successfully produced from Presage radiochromic material by utilizing 3D printed molds of rat CT contours. The dosimeters were found to be compatible with optical-CT dose readout in high-resolution 3D (0.5 mm isotropic voxels) with minimal artifacts or noise. Cone-beam CT image guidance was possible with these dosimeters due to sufficient contrast between high-Z spinal inserts and tissue equivalent Presage material (CNR ∼10 on CBCT images). Dose at isocenter measured with optical-CT was found to agree with nanoscintillator measurement to within 2.8%. Maximum dose in line profiles taken through Presage and film dose slices agreed within 3%, with FWHM measurements through each profile found to agree within 2%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This work demonstrates the feasibility of using 3D printing technology to make anatomically accurate Presage rodent-morphic dosimeters incorporating spinal-mimicking inserts. High quality optical-CT 3D dosimetry is feasible on these dosimeters, despite the irregular surfaces and implanted inserts. The ability to measure dose distributions in anatomically accurate phantoms represents a powerful useful additional verification tool for preclinical microSBRT.
authors: Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705.
authors: Steven T
authors: ST
authors: Bache
authors: Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705.
authors: Titania
authors: T
authors: Juang
authors: Duke University Medical Physics Graduate Program, Durham, North Carolina 27705.
authors: Matthew D
authors: MD
authors: Belley
authors: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
authors: Bridget F
authors: BF
authors: Koontz
authors: Rider University, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648.
authors: John
authors: J
authors: Adamovics
authors: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
authors: Terry T
authors: TT
authors: Yoshizumi
authors: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
authors: David G
authors: DG
authors: Kirsch
authors: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Oldham
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; D051379:Mice; D036103:Nanotechnology; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D066330:Printing, Three-Dimensional; D011874:Radiometry / Q000295:instrumentation*; D016634:Radiosurgery / Q000295:instrumentation*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; D051381:Rats; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted
references: J Vis Exp. 2013;(73):e50250
references: 23542702
references: Med Phys. 2011 Apr;38(4):2265-74
references: 21626961
references: Med Phys. 2011 Dec;38(12):6754-62
references: 22149857
references: Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031714
references: 24593718
references: Med Phys. 2008 Jan;35(1):101-11
references: 18293567
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1591-9
references: 18640502
references: IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom. 2010 Jul 15;2010:2056-2061
references: 21643448
references: Med Phys. 2011 Feb;38(2):845-56
references: 21452722
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jun 7;56(11):3403-16
references: 21572184
references: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2007;10(Pt 2):926-34
references: 18044657
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jun 21;56(12):R55-83
references: 21617291
references: Radiother Oncol. 2013 Dec;109(3):361-6
references: 24183860
references: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 2):619-26
references: 18982656
references: Z Med Phys. 2014 Dec;24(4):323-34
references: 24629309
references: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7791-801
references: 24140983
references: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):540-6
references: 22361085
references: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Apr 21;56(8):2585-99
references: 21444969
references: Phys Med Biol. 2013 May 21;58(10):3377-95
references: 23615380
references: Med Phys. 2014 Jul;41(7):071706
references: 24989375
references: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 7;55(23):7345-62
references: 21081818
references: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jun 7;53(11):2953-70
references: 18475005
references: Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4846-57
references: 21928656
references: Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
references: 22770690
references: Med Phys. 2010 May;37(5):1942-7
references: 20527528
references: Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;120(1-4):107-12
references: 16782984
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42133
references: 22927920
references: Nanoscale. 2014 May 21;6(10):5284-8
references: 24696056