title: Anticipatory Deaccenting in Language Comprehension.
abstract: We evaluated the hypothesis that listeners can generate expectations about upcoming input using anticipatory deaccenting, in which the absence of a nuclear pitch accent on an utterance-new noun is licensed by the subsequent repetition of that noun (e.g.Drag the SQUARE with the house to the TRIangle with the house). The phonemic restoration paradigm was modified to obscure word-initial segmental information uniquely identifying the final word in a spoken instruction, resulting in a stimulus compatible with two lexical alternatives (e.g.mouse/house). In Experiment 1, we measured participants' final interpretations and response times. Experiment 2 used the same materials in a crowd-sourced gating study. Sentence interpretations at gated intervals, final interpretations, and response times provided converging evidence that the anticipatory deaccenting pattern contributed to listeners' referential expectations. The results illustrate the availability and importance of sentence-level accent patterns in spoken language comprehension.
authors: Psychology, Columbia Basin College.
authors: Kathleen
authors: K
authors: Carbary
authors: Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.
authors: Meredith
authors: M
authors: Brown
authors: Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester ; Linguistics, University of Rochester.
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Gunlogson
authors: Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester ; Linguistics, University of Rochester.
authors: Joyce M
authors: JM
authors: McDonough
authors: Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester ; Linguistics, University of Rochester.
authors: Aleksandra
authors: A
authors: Fazlipour
authors: Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester ; Linguistics, University of Rochester.
authors: Michael K
authors: MK
authors: Tanenhaus
keywords: deaccenting; language comprehension; phoneme restoration; prosody; sentence gating
references: J Mem Lang. 2012 Jul 1;67(1):211-223
references: 22754087
references: J Mem Lang. 2014 Feb 1;71(1):145-163
references: 24511179
references: Science. 1970 Jan 23;167(3917):392-3
references: 5409744
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
references: 22006061
references: J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null
references: 24403724
references: Lang Speech. 1995 Oct-Dec;38 ( Pt 4):365-91
references: 8816086
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1981 Dec;110(4):474-94
references: 6459403
references: J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):541-573
references: 19190719
references: Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1232-44
references: 21585451