title: Priming psychic and conjuring abilities of a magic demonstration influences event interpretation and random number generation biases.
abstract: Magical ideation and belief in the paranormal is considered to represent a trait-like character; people either believe in it or not. Yet, anecdotes indicate that exposure to an anomalous event can turn skeptics into believers. This transformation is likely to be accompanied by altered cognitive functioning such as impaired judgments of event likelihood. Here, we investigated whether the exposure to an anomalous event changes individuals' explicit traditional (religious) and non-traditional (e.g., paranormal) beliefs as well as cognitive biases that have previously been associated with non-traditional beliefs, e.g., repetition avoidance when producing random numbers in a mental dice task. In a classroom, 91 students saw a magic demonstration after their psychology lecture. Before the demonstration, half of the students were told that the performance was done respectively by a conjuror (magician group) or a psychic (psychic group). The instruction influenced participants' explanations of the anomalous event. Participants in the magician, as compared to the psychic group, were more likely to explain the event through conjuring abilities while the reverse was true for psychic abilities. Moreover, these explanations correlated positively with their prior traditional and non-traditional beliefs. Finally, we observed that the psychic group showed more repetition avoidance than the magician group, and this effect remained the same regardless of whether assessed before or after the magic demonstration. We conclude that pre-existing beliefs and contextual suggestions both influence people's interpretations of anomalous events and associated cognitive biases. Beliefs and associated cognitive biases are likely flexible well into adulthood and change with actual life events.
authors: Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Mohr
authors: Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths - University of London London, UK.
authors: Nikolaos
authors: N
authors: Koutrakis
authors: Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths - University of London London, UK.
authors: Gustav
authors: G
authors: Kuhn
keywords: belief formation; cognitive biases; magic; magical beliefs; magical thinking; paranormal beliefs
references: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;42(2):145-8
references: 21315874
references: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jun;194(6):411-4
references: 16772857
references: Front Public Health. 2014 May 21;2:51
references: 24904915
references: Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):295-9
references: 16004663
references: Psychiatry Res. 2005 Sep 15;136(2-3):135-41
references: 16139680
references: Br J Psychol. 2002 Nov;93(Pt 4):519-43
references: 12519532
references: Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):360-81
references: 26189837
references: J Pers Assess. 2002 Aug;79(1):53-72
references: 12227668
references: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Dec;55(6):595-603
references: 11737792
references: Psychopathology. 1993;26(5-6):261-5
references: 8190845
references: J Pers Assess. 1999 Dec;73(3):472-88
references: 10689655
references: Cortex. 2008 Nov-Dec;44(10):1307-15
references: 18640667
references: Child Dev. 1997 Dec;68(6):991-1011
references: 9418217
references: Child Dev. 1994 Dec;65(6):1605-26
references: 7859545
references: Br J Psychol. 2003 Aug;94(Pt 3):285-97
references: 14511544
references: Br J Psychol. 2005 Feb;96(Pt 1):115-27
references: 15826327