title: Acquisition and use of linguistic knowledge: scrambling in child Japanese as a test case.
abstract: The current study investigates preschool-age children's comprehension of scrambled sentences in Japanese. While scrambling has been known to be challenging for children, biasing them to exhibit non-adult-like interpretations (e.g., Hayashibe in Descr Appl Linguist 8:1-18, 1975; Sano in Descr Appl Linguist 10:213-233, 1977; Suzuki in Jpn J Educ Psychol 25(3):56-61, 1977), children are able to interpret scrambled sentences in an adult-like way when the pragmatics is enriched in the experiments (Otsu in Acquisition studies in generative grammar, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 253-264, 1994). These findings suggest that children's difficulty in comprehending scrambling may be due to processing difficulties (Suzuki in J Psycholinguist Res 42(2), 119-137, 2013), such as the Lexical-ordering Strategy bias (Bever in Cognition and language development, Wiley, New York, pp 279-352, 1970), rather than their lack of the linguistic knowledge of scrambling. The current study revealed that children are indeed able to utilize prosodic information to interpret scrambled sentences in an adult-like way. Our findings provide converging evidence in favor of the proposal that children's grammatical knowledge of scrambling is intact, although they are more vulnerable than adults to processing difficulties that hinder their ability to successfully interpret scrambled sentences.
authors: Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Lane, Blake Hall Room 427, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA, minai@ku.edu.
authors: Utako
authors: U
authors: Minai
authors: Miwa
authors: M
authors: Isobe
authors: Reiko
authors: R
authors: Okabe
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D008037:Linguistics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008297:Male; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2005 May;34(3):281-332
references: 16050446
references: Cognition. 1982 Nov;12(3):229-65
references: 6891309
references: J Child Lang. 1987 Feb;14(1):145-67
references: 3558521
references: J Child Lang. 2012 Nov;39(5):919-56
references: 22182242
references: Lang Speech. 1996 Oct-Dec;39 ( Pt 4):341-74
references: 9156500
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 1973 Mar;2(1):1-8
references: 24197792
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Apr;42(2):119-37
references: 22460686
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1980 Sep;23(3):688-98
references: 7421166