title: Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales.
abstract: The cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model has been remarkably successful in explaining cosmic structure over an enormous span of redshift, but it has faced persistent challenges from observations that probe the innermost regions of dark matter halos and the properties of the Milky Way's dwarf galaxy satellites. We review the current observational and theoretical status of these "small-scale controversies." Cosmological simulations that incorporate only gravity and collisionless CDM predict halos with abundant substructure and central densities that are too high to match constraints from galaxy dynamics. The solution could lie in baryonic physics: Recent numerical simulations and analytical models suggest that gravitational potential fluctuations tied to efficient supernova feedback can flatten the central cusps of halos in massive galaxies, and a combination of feedback and low star formation efficiency could explain why most of the dark matter subhalos orbiting the Milky Way do not host visible galaxies. However, it is not clear that this solution can work in the lowest mass galaxies, where discrepancies are observed. Alternatively, the small-scale conflicts could be evidence of more complex physics in the dark sector itself. For example, elastic scattering from strong dark matter self-interactions can alter predicted halo mass profiles, leading to good agreement with observations across a wide range of galaxy mass. Gravitational lensing and dynamical perturbations of tidal streams in the stellar halo provide evidence for an abundant population of low-mass subhalos in accord with CDM predictions. These observational approaches will get more powerful over the next few years.
authors: Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; dhw@astronomy.ohio-state.edu.
authors: David H
authors: DH
authors: Weinberg
authors: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
authors: James S
authors: JS
authors: Bullock
authors: Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and.
authors: Fabio
authors: F
authors: Governato
authors: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302.
authors: Rachel
authors: R
authors: Kuzio de Naray
authors: Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
authors: Annika H G
authors: AH
authors: Peter
keywords: cosmology; dark matter; galaxy formation
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Feb 1;100(4):041304
references: 18352257
references: Astrophys J. 2000 May 10;534(2):L143-L146
references: 10813668
references: Nature. 2010 Jan 14;463(7278):203-6
references: 20075915
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Nov 10;97(19):191303
references: 17155611
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Apr 24;84(17):3760-3
references: 11019199
references: Nature. 2012 Jan 18;481(7381):341-3
references: 22258612
references: Nature. 2008 Aug 28;454(7208):1096-7
references: 18756252
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Oct 16;85(16):3335-8
references: 11030890
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Apr 16;104(15):151301
references: 20481979
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Aug 15;113(7):071303
references: 25170698
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Mar 15;110(11):111301
references: 25166522
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 May 15;84(20):4525-8
references: 10990731