title: Grouping by similarity is mediated by feature selection: evidence from the failure of cue combination.
abstract: As one of the most classic gestalt phenomena, grouping is often considered to occur preattentively. Therefore, it seems natural to expect conflicting grouping cues to combine preattentively and to lead to an impression of "no grouping." On the other hand, a recent account suggests that grouping by similarity is mediated by the attentional selection of a feature. This account makes the distinctive prediction that for grouping by similarity, but not for low-level groupings (e.g., connectedness, common region), when two conflicting grouping cues are present, the grouping structure will tend to be driven either by one type of cue or by the other type of cue and will usually not lead to the impression of "no grouping." This predicted pattern of results was confirmed in the present study: the presence of two conflicting low-level grouping cues led to reports of "no grouping" in 73.0 % of the trials, but for two similarity grouping cues, "no grouping" was only reported in 25.5 % of the trials. In summary, although low-level grouping cues do indeed work together to determine the perceptual structure preattentively, grouping by similarity is likely mediated by the attentional selection of a feature.
authors: Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, The People's Republic of China. lqhuang@psy.cuhk.edu.hk.
authors: Liqiang
authors: L
authors: Huang
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Attention; Feature selection; Grouping; Grouping cues; Similarity
references: Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;115(1):131-54
references: 18211188
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Apr;23(2):339-52
references: 9103998
references: Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):101-30
references: 7878160
references: Nature. 1998 Sep 24;395(6700):376-81
references: 9759726
references: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):599-631
references: 17638498
references: Sci Am. 1971 Dec;225(6):63-71
references: 5116412
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1132-7
references: 21828350
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Mar;1(1):29-55
references: 24203413
references: Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):1-13
references: 19647817
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1382-90
references: 20718572
references: Cogn Psychol. 1992 Jul;24(3):436-47
references: 1516361
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:203-27
references: 16776584
references: Trends Neurosci. 2000 Nov;23(11):571-9
references: 11074267