title: Starving honeybees lose self-control.
abstract: Impulsivity, the widespread preference for a smaller and more immediate reward over a larger and more delayed reward, is known to vary across species, and the metabolic and social hypotheses present contrasting explanations for this variation. However, this presents a paradox for an animal such as the honeybee, which is highly social, yet has a high metabolic rate. We test between these two competing hypotheses by investigating the effect of hunger on impulsivity in bees isolated from their social environment. Using an olfactory conditioning assay, we trained individuals to associate a small and a large reward with or without a delay, and we tested their choice between the two rewards at different levels of starvation. We found an increase in impulsive behaviour and an associated increase in dopamine levels in the brain with increasing starvation. These results suggest that the energetic state of an individual, even in a eusocial group, is a critical driver of impulsivity, and that the social harmony of a group can be threatened when the energetic states of the group members are in conflict.
authors: Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Institute for Biology/General Zoology, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany cmayack@gmail.com.
authors: Christopher
authors: C
authors: Mayack
authors: Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
authors: Dhruba
authors: D
authors: Naug
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D001679:Biogenic Amines / Q000032:analysis; D001921:Brain / Q000378:metabolism*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D007175:Impulsive Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D012201:Reward; D013217:Starvation
chemical_list: D001679:Biogenic Amines
keywords: energetic state; honeybee; impulsivity; self-control; starvation
references: J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):126-33
references: 8026163
references: Trends Genet. 2007 Jul;23(7):334-41
references: 17509723
references: Curr Biol. 2008 Jan 8;18(1):R11-2
references: 18177703
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Nov;11(4):303-27
references: 18453466
references: J Invertebr Pathol. 2009 Mar;100(3):185-8
references: 19135448
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):183-8
references: 20424042
references: Learn Behav. 2013 Jun;41(2):148-58
references: 22983791
references: Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):128-36
references: 21920413
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1137-44
references: 22972907
references: J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 30;30(26):8888-96
references: 20592211
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Mar;18(3):127-33
references: 24439530
references: Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):633-44
references: 24121898
references: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):348-61
references: 10550486
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):259-63
references: 12120787
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 24;424(6947):388
references: 12879057
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2457-63
references: 14667335
references: Physiol Behav. 2004 Apr;81(2):179-209
references: 15159167
references: J Comp Psychol. 1983 Jun;97(2):107-19
references: 6872507