title: Foam pads properties and their effects on posturography in participants of different weight.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Foam pads are increasingly used on force platforms during balance assessments in order to produce increased instability thereby permitting the measurement of enhanced posturographic parameters. A variety of foam pads providing different material properties have thus been used, although it is still unclear which characteristics produce the most effective and reliable tests. Furthermore, the effects of participant bodyweight on the performance of the foam pads and outcome of the test are unknown. This project investigated how different foam samples affected postural sway velocity in participants of different weights.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four foam types were tested according to a modified American Society for Testing and Materials standard method for testing flexible cellular materials. Thirty-six healthy male factory workers divided into three groups according to body mass were tested three times for each of the 13 randomly-selected experimental situations for changes in postural sway velocity in this cross-over study. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the results and evaluate the difference in sway velocity between mass groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For the materials considered here, the modulus of elasticity of the foam pads when compressed by 25% of their original heights was inversely proportional to their density. The largest changes in postural sway velocity were measured when the pads of highest stiffness were used, with memory foam pads being the least likely to produce significant changes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The type of foam pads used in posturography is indeed important. Our study shows that the samples with a higher modulus of elasticity produced the largest change in postural sway velocity during quiet stance. The results suggest that foam pads used for static computerised posturography should 1) possess a higher modulus of elasticity and 2) show linear deformation properties matched to the participants' weight.
authors: School of Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX UK.
authors: Guy
authors: G
authors: Gosselin
authors: School of Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU6 7RX UK.
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Fagan
keywords: Balance; Biomechanics; Foam pads; Modulus of elasticity; Posturography
references: Gait Posture. 2008 Nov;28(4):649-56
references: 18602829
references: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jan;27(1):45-52
references: 22593115
references: Gait Posture. 2005 Nov;22(3):240-9
references: 16278966
references: J Sports Sci Med. 2014 May 01;13(2):329-37
references: 24790487
references: Gait Posture. 2014;39(1):599-605
references: 24184137
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996 Sep;43(9):956-66
references: 9214811
references: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48
references: 20485226
references: J Biomech. 2010 Dec 1;43(16):3214-6
references: 20813369
references: Med Pr. 2013;64(1):83-102
references: 23650771
references: Gait Posture. 2009 Jan;29(1):158-60
references: 18815042
references: Neurosci Lett. 2014 Nov 7;583:49-54
references: 25242449
references: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Aug;121(4):478-94
references: 9746156
references: JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
references: 24141714
references: J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2011 Jan;15(1):82-91
references: 21147423
references: Lancet. 2011 Feb 12;377(9765):557-67
references: 21295846
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1629-37
references: 24862764
references: J Occup Rehabil. 2003 Mar;13(1):33-43
references: 12611029
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1869-77
references: 21112428
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Aug;18(7):655-61
references: 12880713
references: J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998 Jun;35(2):219-24
references: 9651894
references: Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):52-8
references: 25307955