title: Rats prefer mutual rewards in a prosocial choice task.
abstract: Pro-sociality, i.e., the preference for outcomes that produce benefits for other individuals, is ubiquitous in humans. Recently, cross-species comparisons of social behavior have offered important new insights into the evolution of pro-sociality. Here, we present a rodent analog of the Pro-social Choice Task that controls strategic components, de-confounds other-regarding choice motives from the animals' natural tendencies to maximize own food access and directly tests the effect of social context on choice allocation. We trained pairs of rats-an actor and a partner rat-in a double T-maze task where actors decided between two alternatives only differing in the reward delivered to the partner. The "own reward" choice yielded a reward only accessible to the actor whereas the "both reward" choice produced an additional reward for a partner (partner condition) or an inanimate toy (toy Condition), located in an adjacent compartment. We found that actors chose "both reward" at levels above chance and more often in the partner than in the toy condition. Moreover, we show that this choice pattern adapts to the current social context and that the observed behavior is stable over time.
authors: Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors: Julen
authors: J
authors: Hernandez-Lallement
authors: Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors: Marijn
authors: M
authors: van Wingerden
authors: Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Marx
authors: Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors: Milan
authors: M
authors: Srejic
authors: Comparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, Germany.
authors: Tobias
authors: T
authors: Kalenscher
keywords: decision making; prosocial behavior; prosocial choice task; rats; social behavior
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e184
references: 17594177
references: Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):1251776
references: 25324394
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21855
references: 21765921
references: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6573
references: 19672292
references: Nature. 2003 Sep 18;425(6955):297-9
references: 13679918
references: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):342-9
references: 23202663
references: Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1755-8
references: 12805551
references: Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1357-9
references: 16251965
references: Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):766-76
references: 18191963
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Apr;11(4):168-76
references: 17337237
references: Front Neurosci. 2011 Jun 17;5:82
references: 21731558
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1115-20
references: 16024372
references: Curr Biol. 2014 Nov 3;24(21):2564-8
references: 25438944
references: Elife. 2014;3:e01385
references: 24424411
references: Science. 2004 Aug 27;305(5688):1254-8
references: 15333831
references: Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 27;5:4747
references: 25158760
references: PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14115
references: 21124767
references: Anim Behav. 1966 Apr-Jul;14(2):367-71
references: 6006026
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 22;277(1701):3845-51
references: 20630886
references: Nat Neurosci. 2013 Feb;16(2):243-50
references: 23263442
references: Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30
references: 22158823
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Jul;5(7):e196
references: 17608566
references: Nat Neurosci. 2004 May;7(5):446-51
references: 15114356
references: PLoS One. 2014 Jan 08;9(1):e84299
references: 24416212
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Aug;15(8):549-62
references: 24986556
references: Primates. 2011 Jul;52(3):237-47
references: 21416218
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Mar 29;12:41
references: 22455399
references: Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):609-18
references: 24126919
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3588-92
references: 22315399
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13847-51
references: 21825175
references: Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):912-5
references: 16929297
references: Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):598-602
references: 17962552
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6
references: 18077409
references: PLoS One. 2009 Oct 14;4(10):e7416
references: 19826478
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 7;278(1710):1405-13
references: 20980301
references: Physiol Behav. 1999 Jun;66(4):639-43
references: 10386908
references: PLoS One. 2014 Sep 05;9(9):e103422
references: 25191860
references: PLoS One. 2010 Dec 01;5(12):e15077
references: 21152023
references: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 13;5(1):e8483
references: 20084113
references: PLoS One. 2010 Mar 17;5(3):e9734
references: 20305812
references: J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 6;34(32):10616-23
references: 25100595
references: Trends Neurosci. 1998 Feb;21(2):71-5
references: 9498302
references: Curr Biol. 2012 Aug 21;22(16):R627-8
references: 22917506
references: Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):47-83
references: 26192595