title: The relationship of perioperative fluid administration to outcomes in colorectal and pancreatic surgery: a review of the literature.
abstract: Optimal perioperative fluid administration in major gastrointestinal surgery remains a challenging clinical problem. Traditional dogma of a liberal approach to fluid administration in order to counteract potential hypovolemia and decreased end-organ perfusion can often result in fluid overload, perhaps negatively impacting perioperative outcomes. This hypothesis has been investigated in several types of gastrointestinal surgery. We discuss the current literature on perioperative fluid administration in colorectal and pancreatic surgery and highlight the controversies that still exist.
authors: Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
authors: Oliver S
authors: OS
authors: Eng
authors: Laleh G
authors: LG
authors: Melstrom
authors: Darren R
authors: DR
authors: Carpizo
mesh_terms: D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D005440:Fluid Therapy; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D019990:Perioperative Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications
keywords: colorectal; fluid; outcomes; pancreatic; surgery
references: Anesthesiology. 2012 Dec;117(6):1165-74
references: 23135262
references: Perioper Med (Lond). 2012 Jun 27;1:2
references: 24764518
references: J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;105(1):81-4
references: 21792977
references: Ann Surg. 1961 Nov;154:803-10
references: 13912109
references: Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1546-53
references: 16244030
references: J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(4):242-7
references: 23907788
references: Br J Anaesth. 2002 Oct;89(4):622-32
references: 12393365
references: Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):817-30
references: 23079762
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD009161
references: 25121931
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1397-402
references: 15484356
references: J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(4):407-11
references: 24861716
references: Br J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;97(6):755-7
references: 17098724
references: Anesth Analg. 2005 Aug;101(2):601-5
references: 16037184
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1069-76
references: 16888706
references: Lancet. 2002 May 25;359(9320):1812-8
references: 12044376
references: Br J Surg. 2009 Apr;96(4):331-41
references: 19283742
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Dec;93(12):1469-74
references: 17078116
references: Anaesthesia. 2002 Sep;57(9):845-9
references: 12190747
references: World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1909-18
references: 23568250
references: Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1774-81
references: 23774337
references: Colorectal Dis. 2006 Sep;8(7):563-9
references: 16919107
references: World J Surg. 2013 Jun;37(6):1193-202
references: 23463399
references: J Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;107(5):529-35
references: 23136127
references: Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jun;110(6):940-6
references: 23348202
references: Anesthesiology. 2005 Jul;103(1):25-32
references: 15983453
references: Br J Surg. 2012 Feb;99(2):186-91
references: 21948211
references: Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):952-8
references: 21107104
references: Ann Surg. 2014 Sep;260(3):445-53; discussion 453-5
references: 25115420
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):800-9
references: 16775831
references: Transplant Proc. 2012 Mar;44(2):433-7
references: 22410036
references: Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):634-42
references: 16155038
references: J Invest Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;18(4):161-5
references: 16126626
references: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Oct;46(9):1089-93
references: 12366503
references: Ann Surg. 2003 Nov;238(5):641-8
references: 14578723
references: Proc Nutr Soc. 2010 Nov;69(4):488-98
references: 20515521
references: Br J Anaesth. 2007 Oct;99(4):500-8
references: 17681972