title: The Alpha-defensin Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Responds to a Wide Spectrum of Organisms.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The alpha-defensin test has been previously demonstrated to be highly accurate in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), nearly matching the Musculoskeletal Infection Society definition for PJI. However, the relationship between alpha-defensin levels and differing infecting organism has not yet been investigated.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study is to describe the breadth of organisms that can trigger a positive synovial fluid alpha-defensin test result in the setting of PJI and also to assess the magnitude of the alpha-defensin result in terms of various pathogen characteristics.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between December 2012 and March 2014, one laboratory processed 2319 synovial fluid samples for alpha-defensin testing. The present study reviewed the results of the 1937 samples that simultaneously had a synovial fluid culture performed; these came from 418 surgeons in 42 states. The overall culture-positive rate was 49% (244 of 498) among alpha-defensin-positive synovial fluids and 1% (19 of 1439) among alpha-defensin-negative synovial fluids. The organisms recovered from 244 alpha-defensin-positive, culture-positive fluids were recorded and grouped based on various characteristics, including Gram type, species, virulence, oral pathogenicity, and source joint. Alpha-defensin-negative samples served as uninfected controls. Median alpha-defensin levels were calculated for each group, and Dunn's multiple comparison test for nonparametric data was used to identify any statistically significant (p < 0.05) organism-specific differences in the alpha-defensin level.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The alpha-defensin test for PJI was positive in the setting of a wide spectrum of organisms typically causing PJI. The median alpha-defensin level for all 244 alpha-defensin-positive, culture-positive samples (4.7 [interquartile range {IQR}, 3.7-5.3]) was higher than negative controls (0.26 [IQR, 0.22-0.33]) with a median difference of 4.4 (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the median alpha-defensin levels when performing a multiple comparison test among Gram-positive organisms (4.7 [IQR, 3.6-5.3]), Gram-negative organisms (4.8 [IQR, 4.2-5.3]), yeast (4.1 [IQR, 2.2-5.1]), virulent organisms (4.7 [IQR, 3.8-5.2]), less virulent organisms (4.8 [IQR, 3.6-5.4]), oral pathogens (4.5 [IQR, 3.2-5.2]), knees (4.7 [IQR, 3.7-5.3]), hips (4.9 [IQR, 4.1-5.8]), or shoulders (5.3 [IQR, 4.0-10.7]) with all comparisons having a p > 0.999.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The alpha-defensin test provides consistent results regardless of the organism type, Gram type, species, or virulence of the organism and should be seriously considered to be a standard diagnostic tool in the evaluation for PJI. Future research should focus on the performance of this test in specific clinical scenarios such as the immediate postoperative period in the setting of severe immunocompromise and in the setting of a native joint.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level III, diagnostic study.
authors: CD Diagnostics Inc, Claymont, DE, USA.
authors: Carl
authors: C
authors: Deirmengian
authors: Keith
authors: K
authors: Kardos
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Kilmartin
authors: Simmi
authors: S
authors: Gulati
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Citrano
authors: Robert E
authors: RE
authors: Booth
mesh_terms: D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000382:microbiology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013582:Synovial Fluid / Q000737:chemistry*; D023084:alpha-Defensins / Q000032:analysis*
chemical_list: D023084:alpha-Defensins
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3501-8
references: 22895042
references: J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):877-82
references: 24199997
references: HSS J. 2014 Feb;10(1):36-44
references: 24482620
references: J Clin Invest. 1985 Oct;76(4):1427-35
references: 2997278
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May;81(5):672-83
references: 10360695
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3254-62
references: 24590839
references: New Microbiol. 2008 Jan;31(1):97-104
references: 18437847
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):e1
references: 24382729
references: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;79(4):448-53
references: 24972853
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):198-203
references: 24942960
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):204-5
references: 25028108
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):4006-9
references: 25256621
references: J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct;52(10):3583-9
references: 25056331
references: J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1331
references: 24768547
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Dec 19;94(24):2247-54
references: 23318615
references: J Knee Surg. 2014 Aug;27(4):259-65
references: 24622913
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 3;96(17):1439-45
references: 25187582