title: Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Pelvic floor disorders are becoming more prevalent in the elderly population. Since more patients are seeking definitive management for their prolapse, the number of elderly patients undergoing sacral colpopexies will likely increase. During sacral colpopexies, the surgeon must carefully dissect in the presacral space and avoid vital structures. In elderly patients the aorta potentially elongates and the vertebral body height decreases. Consequently, there is a potential for anatomical change of distance from the bifurcation of the aorta to the sacral promontory. This study aimed to correlate the aorta-sacral promontory distance with age.
  
  
  METHODS
  From 1 January 2013 to 31 January 2014 computed tomography (CT) images of 241 patients were reviewed in this retrospective study. Radiologists measured the aorta-sacral promontory distance on sagittal acquisition. The corresponding demographic information of age, body mass index, and comorbidities was evaluated using univariate analysis and univariate linear regression.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean age was 56.6 years, and BMI was 27.6. The mean aorta-sacral promontory measurement based on the CT scan was 63.11 mm. Univariate analysis using a t test and ANOVA demonstrated an inverse correlation with age (p < 0.0001) and hypertension (p = 0.0034) and a positive correlation with BMI categories (p < 0.0017) Under univariate linear regression, the weight of the patient in kilograms demonstrated positive correlation (p = 0.0413).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Based on CT measurements, the aorta-sacral promontory distance is decreased in elderly and hypertensive patients. Heavier patients have an increased aorta-sacral promontory distance. These potential anatomical variants should be considered before operating in the presacral space.
authors: Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of OB/GYN, University of Louisville, 550 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA, a0agra05@louisville.edu.
authors: Anubhav
authors: A
authors: Agrawal
authors: Aly
authors: A
authors: Abayazeed
authors: Sean L
authors: SL
authors: Francis
authors: Jocelyn
authors: J
authors: Tolentino
authors: Donald R
authors: DR
authors: Ostergard
authors: Albert
authors: A
authors: Seow
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Van Bogaert
authors: Timothy
authors: T
authors: Rose
authors: Nicolette E
authors: NE
authors: Deveneau
authors: Ali
authors: A
authors: Azadi
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology*; D001012:Aorta, Abdominal / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D001027:Aortography; D015992:Body Mass Index; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008875:Middle Aged; D059952:Pelvic Floor Disorders / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012447:Sacrum / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D055815:Young Adult
references: Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(1):63-8
references: 9574492
references: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Apr;80(4):1118-23
references: 7714079
references: Hypertension. 1995 Feb;25(2):155-61
references: 7843763
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):805-23
references: 15458906
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):600-9
references: 19701041
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141-8
references: 24463674
references: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990 Sep-Oct;14(5):748-52
references: 2398153
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;208(6):486.e1-7
references: 23454254
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1752-8
references: 15902189
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):5-12
references: 24463657
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Aug 15;20(16):1797-802
references: 7502137
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1369-84
references: 19037049