title: Social identity threat motivates science-discrediting online comments.
abstract: Experiencing social identity threat from scientific findings can lead people to cognitively devalue the respective findings. Three studies examined whether potentially threatening scientific findings motivate group members to take action against the respective findings by publicly discrediting them on the Web. Results show that strongly (vs. weakly) identified group members (i.e., people who identified as "gamers") were particularly likely to discredit social identity threatening findings publicly (i.e., studies that found an effect of playing violent video games on aggression). A content analytical evaluation of online comments revealed that social identification specifically predicted critiques of the methodology employed in potentially threatening, but not in non-threatening research (Study 2). Furthermore, when participants were collectively (vs. self-) affirmed, identification did no longer predict discrediting posting behavior (Study 3). These findings contribute to the understanding of the formation of online collective action and add to the burgeoning literature on the question why certain scientific findings sometimes face a broad public opposition.
authors: Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Nauroth
authors: Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
authors: Mario
authors: M
authors: Gollwitzer
authors: University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
authors: Jens
authors: J
authors: Bender
authors: University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
authors: Tobias
authors: T
authors: Rothmund
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000374:Aggression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009042:Motivation; D011639:Public Opinion; D012586:Science / Q000379:methods; D012933:Social Identification; D018910:Video Games; D014754:Violence; D055815:Young Adult
references: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Dec;13(3):106-31
references: 26173286
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Aug;33(8):1100-12
references: 17630262
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Apr;35(4):415-27
references: 19141621
references: Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Jun;7(3):321-6
references: 15257832
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88
references: 16702152
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Feb;11(1):28-45
references: 18453454
references: Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Apr;17(4):228-34
references: 24256132
references: Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 Feb;4(2):91-4
references: 19197309
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:539-70
references: 10751980
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 May;7(3):203-20
references: 26168459
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90
references: 24889601
references: Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;134(4):504-35
references: 18605818
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;39(3):321-31
references: 23359086
references: Psychol Bull. 2004 Jan;130(1):80-114
references: 14717651
references: PLoS Biol. 2008 Sep 23;6(9):e240
references: 18816167
references: Psychol Bull. 2006 Sep;132(5):778-822
references: 16910754
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jan;96(1):183-202
references: 19210074
references: Mil Med. 2015 Jan;180(1):e157-9
references: 25562877
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):144-65
references: 18605857
references: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 May;29(5):568-77
references: 15272991
references: Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):597-617
references: 23121468
references: PLoS One. 2014 Apr 10;9(4):e93440
references: 24722467
references: Science. 2013 Aug 9;341(6146):647-51
references: 23929980