title: Comparison of European (ESR) and American (ACR) white papers on teleradiology: patient primacy is paramount.
abstract: The ACR and European Society of Radiology white papers on teleradiology propose best practice guidelines for teleradiology, with each body focusing on its respective local situation, market, and legal regulations. The organizations have common viewpoints, the most important being patient primacy, maintenance of quality, and the "supplementary" position of teleradiology to local services. The major differences between the white papers are related mainly to the market situation, the use of teleradiology, teleradiologist credentialing and certification, the principles of "international" teleradiology, and the need to obtain "informed consent" from patients. The authors describe these similarities and differences by highlighting the background and context of teleradiology in Europe and the United States.
authors: Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. Electronic address: e.ranschaert@jbz.nl.
authors: Erik R
authors: ER
authors: Ranschaert
authors: Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
authors: Giles W
authors: GW
authors: Boland
authors: Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
authors: Andre J
authors: AJ
authors: Duerinckx
authors: Diagnostiek voor U, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
authors: Frits H
authors: FH
authors: Barneveld Binkhuysen
mesh_terms: D005060:Europe; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000592:standards*; D010358:Patient Participation; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D019112:Teleradiology / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States
keywords: Europe; Teleradiology; United States; legal issues; patient primacy; regulatory issues; teleradiologic services; white paper