title: Electrochemically and bioelectrochemically induced ammonium recovery.
abstract: Streams such as urine and manure can contain high levels of ammonium, which could be recovered for reuse in agriculture or chemistry. The extraction of ammonium from an ammonium-rich stream is demonstrated using an electrochemical and a bioelectrochemical system. Both systems are controlled by a potentiostat to either fix the current (for the electrochemical cell) or fix the potential of the working electrode (for the bioelectrochemical cell). In the bioelectrochemical cell, electroactive bacteria catalyze the anodic reaction, whereas in the electrochemical cell the potentiostat applies a higher voltage to produce a current. The current and consequent restoration of the charge balance across the cell allow the transport of cations, such as ammonium, across a cation exchange membrane from the anolyte to the catholyte. The high pH of the catholyte leads to formation of ammonia, which can be stripped from the medium and captured in an acid solution, thus enabling the recovery of a valuable nutrient. The flux of ammonium across the membrane is characterized at different anolyte ammonium concentrations and currents for both the abiotic and biotic reactor systems. Both systems are compared based on current and removal efficiencies for ammonium, as well as the energy input required to drive ammonium transfer across the cation exchange membrane. Finally, a comparative analysis considering key aspects such as reliability, electrode cost, and rate is made. This video article and protocol provide the necessary information to conduct electrochemical and bioelectrochemical ammonia recovery experiments. The reactor setup for the two cases is explained, as well as the reactor operation. We elaborate on data analysis for both reactor types and on the advantages and disadvantages of bioelectrochemical and electrochemical systems.
authors: Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University.
authors: Sylvia
authors: S
authors: Gildemyn
authors: Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University.
authors: Amanda K
authors: AK
authors: Luther
authors: Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University.
authors: Stephen J
authors: SJ
authors: Andersen
authors: Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University.
authors: Joachim
authors: J
authors: Desloover
authors: Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Ghent University; korneel.rabaey@ugent.be.
authors: Korneel
authors: K
authors: Rabaey
mesh_terms: D064751:Ammonium Compounds / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D055664:Electrochemical Techniques / Q000379:methods; D004566:Electrodes; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D062065:Wastewater / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D064751:Ammonium Compounds; D062065:Wastewater
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;78(3):409-18
references: 18193419
references: Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001 May;32(5):340-5
references: 11328502
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Jul;79(6):901-13
references: 18506439
references: Water Res. 2012 May 15;46(8):2627-36
references: 22406284
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Apr 1;99(5):1120-7
references: 17972328
references: J Vis Exp. 2013 Dec 29;(82):50800
references: 24430581
references: J Hazard Mater. 2007 Jul 16;145(3):391-7
references: 17178436
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Nov 6;46(21):12209-16
references: 23050591
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jul 15;39(14):5488-93
references: 16082985
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jun 17;48(12):7135-42
references: 24844669
references: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Dec;100(23):5537-45
references: 19577923
references: Biosens Bioelectron. 2013 Sep 15;47:184-9
references: 23578972
references: ChemSusChem. 2012 Jun;5(6):1027-38
references: 22615099