title: Mitochondrial DNA analysis reveals hidden genetic diversity in captive populations of the threatened American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) in Colombia.
abstract: Identification of units within species worthy of separate management consideration is an important area within conservation. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) surveys can potentially contribute to this by identifying phylogenetic and population structure below the species level. The American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) is broadly distributed throughout the Neotropics. Its numbers have been reduced severely with the species threatened throughout much of its distribution. In Colombia, the release of individuals from commercial captive populations has emerged as a possible conservation strategy that could contribute to species recovery. However, no studies have addressed levels of genetic differentiation or diversity within C. acutus in Colombia, thus complicating conservation and management decisions. Here, sequence variation was studied in mtDNA cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase I gene sequences in three Colombian captive populations of C. acutus. Two distinct lineages were identified: C. acutus-I, corresponding to haplotypes from Colombia and closely related Central American haplotypes; and C. acutus-II, corresponding to all remaining haplotypes from Colombia. Comparison with findings from other studies indicates the presence of a single "northern" lineage (corresponding to C. acutus-I) distributed from North America (southern Florida), through Central America and into northern South America. The absence of C. acutus-II haplotypes from North and Central America indicates that the C. acutus-II lineage probably represents a separate South American lineage. There appears to be sufficient divergence between lineages to suggest that they could represent two distinct evolutionary units. We suggest that this differentiation needs to be recognized for conservation purposes because it clearly contributes to the overall genetic diversity of the species. All Colombian captive populations included in this study contained a mixture of representatives of both lineages. As such, we recommend against the use of captive-bred individuals for conservation strategies until further genetic information is available.
authors: Grupo de Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Instituto de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Bloor
authors: Grupo de Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Instituto de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
authors: Carolina
authors: C
authors: Ibáñez
authors: Grupo de Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Instituto de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
authors: Thomas A
authors: TA
authors: Viloria-Lagares
keywords: Captive population; conservation; crocodile; genetic diversity; management; mitochondrial DNA
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):290-295
references: 10856956
references: Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
references: 22357727
references: J Exp Zool. 2002 Dec 15;294(4):373-81
references: 12461816
references: Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):465-75
references: 21486369
references: Rev Biol Trop. 2008 Sep;56(3):1471-80
references: 19419058
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Oct;9(10):373-5
references: 21236896
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
references: 21546353
references: Ecol Evol. 2014 Apr;4(8):1313-27
references: 24834328
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2008 Dec 1;309(10):674-86
references: 18800373
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2008 Dec 1;309(10):661-73
references: 18626922
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2008 Dec 1;309(10):649-60
references: 18646197
references: Zoo Biol. 2011 Jan-Feb;30(1):65-70
references: 20235106
references: Syst Biol. 2005 Apr;54(2):241-53
references: 16012095
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Apr;31(1):351-62
references: 15019630
references: Mol Ecol. 2001 Dec;10(12):2741-52
references: 11903888
references: Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
references: 10547847
references: Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(3):463-75
references: 17257106
references: Evolution. 2011 Nov;65(11):3285-97
references: 22023592
references: Syst Biol. 2002 Apr;51(2):238-54
references: 12028731
references: Zoo Biol. 2012 Jan-Feb;31(1):107-20
references: 21674601
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
references: 7984417
references: J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. 2011 Jul 1;315(6):358-75
references: 21462351
references: Zoo Biol. 2011 Nov-Dec;30(6):636-46
references: 22147592
references: Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772
references: 22847109
references: Gene. 2011 Jun 1;478(1-2):35-41
references: 21310220
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Sep;19(9):489-96
references: 16701312
references: Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):619-33
references: 1385266
references: Mol Ecol. 2000 Oct;9(10):1657-9
references: 11050560