title: Effect of the discipline of formal faculty advisors  on medical student experience and career interest.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine whether the discipline (family medicine vs other specialty) of formally assigned faculty advisors affected medical student experience and career interest.
  
  
  METHODS
  Survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  University of Calgary in Alberta.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 104 medical students from the graduating class of 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  Number of times medical students met with their advisors, topics of discussions, interest in family medicine, and overall medical school experience. For binary categorical variables, χ2 tests of significance were computed, and t tests were used for count and Likert-scale variables.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 89 (86%) surveys were returned. Significant differences were noted when the discipline of the faculty advisor (family medicine vs Royal College specialty) was considered. Family medicine faculty advisors met with their students more often (P = .03) and were more likely to have a beneficial effect on the medical school experience (P = .005). Having a relationship with a family medicine faculty advisor significantly increased family medicine career interest (P = .01), although a faculty advisor in any other discipline did not erode family medicine interest. The discipline of the faculty advisor had no statistically significant influence on a student's intended selection of family medicine in the Canadian Resident Matching Service match.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Family medicine faculty advisors appear particularly active in their role as mentors and appear beneficial to the medical student experience. Career interest in family medicine was enhanced by being paired with a family medicine advisor and not eroded by an advisor from another specialty.
authors: Douglas L
authors: DL
authors: Myhre
authors: Kelli
authors: K
authors: Sherlock
authors: Tyler
authors: T
authors: Williamson
authors: Jeanette Somlak
authors: JS
authors: Pedersen
mesh_terms: D000416:Alberta; D002321:Career Choice; D003657:Decision Making; D004501:Education, Medical; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008611:Mentors; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013337:Students, Medical
references: Curr Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;60(2):210-3
references: 14972298
references: Med Educ. 2012 May;46(5):473-84
references: 22515755
references: JAMA. 1988 Apr 1;259(13):1970-5
references: 3346978
references: Am J Med Sci. 1995 Jul;310(1):19-23
references: 7604834
references: Acad Med. 2005 Apr;80(4):344-8
references: 15793017
references: Am Surg. 2005 Nov;71(11):971-4; discussion 974-6
references: 16372617
references: Am J Surg. 2007 Jan;193(1):90-3
references: 17188095
references: Teach Learn Med. 2007 Winter;19(1):55-60
references: 17331000
references: Acad Med. 2007 Jul;82(7):718-22
references: 17595575
references: Teach Learn Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;20(2):163-7
references: 18444204
references: Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):754-60
references: 18667890
references: Can J Surg. 2008 Oct;51(5):371-7
references: 18841235
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Dec;207(6):793-800, 800.e1-2
references: 19183524
references: Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010 Feb;49(2):116-22
references: 20080517
references: Med Educ. 2010 Jun;44(6):603-12
references: 20604857
references: Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e315-21
references: 20662566
references: BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:25
references: 21549017
references: Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;26(1):1-9
references: 21764547
references: Am Surg. 2011 Nov;77(11):1432-4
references: 22196650
references: Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Mar;11(3):253-5
references: 15001404