title: Consolidated bioprocessing performance of Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum M18 on fungal pretreated cornstalk for enhanced hydrogen production.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Biological hydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass shows great potential as a promising alternative to conventional hydrogen production methods, such as electrolysis of water and coal gasification. Currently, most researches on biohydrogen production from lignocellulose concentrate on consolidated bioprocessing, which has the advantages of simpler operation and lower cost over processes featuring dedicated cellulase production. However, the recalcitrance of the lignin structure induces a low cellulase activity, making the carbohydrates in the hetero-matrix more unapproachable. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass is consequently an extremely important step in the commercialization of biohydrogen, and for massive realization of lignocellulosic biomass as alternative fuel feedstock. Thus, development of a pretreatment method which is cost efficient, environmentally benign, and highly efficient for enhanced consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrogen is essential.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this research, fungal pretreatment was adopted for enhanced hydrogen production by consolidated bioprocessing performance. To confirm the fungal pretreatment efficiency, two typical thermochemical pretreatments were also compared side by side. Results showed that the fungal pretreatment was superior to the other pretreatments in terms of high lignin reduction of up to 35.3% with least holocellulose loss (the value was only 9.5%). Microscopic structure observation combined with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis further demonstrated that the lignin and crystallinity of lignocellulose were decreased with better holocellulose reservation. Upon fungal pretreatment, the hydrogen yield and hydrogen production rate were 6.8 mmol H2 g(-1) pretreated substrate and 0.89 mmol L(-1) h(-1), respectively, which were 2.9 and 4 times higher than the values obtained for the untreated sample.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results revealed that although all pretreatments could contribute to the enhancement of hydrogen production from cornstalk, fungal pretreatment proved to be the optimal method. It is apparent that besides high hydrogen production efficiency, fungal pretreatment also offered several advantages over other pretreatments such as being environmentally benign and energy efficient. This pretreatment method thus has great potential for application in consolidated bioprocessing performance of hydrogen production.
authors: State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China.
authors: Lei
authors: L
authors: Zhao
authors: State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China ; School of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China.
authors: Guang-Li
authors: GL
authors: Cao
authors: State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China.
authors: Ai-Jie
authors: AJ
authors: Wang
authors: State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China.
authors: Hong-Yu
authors: HY
authors: Ren
authors: College of Power and Energy Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001 China.
authors: Kun
authors: K
authors: Zhang
authors: State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090 China.
authors: Nan-Qi
authors: NQ
authors: Ren
keywords: Consolidated bioprocessing; Cornstalk; Hydrogen production; Pretreatment; Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum M18
references: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Jan;100(1):10-8
references: 18599291
references: J Biol Chem. 1963 Aug;238:2882-6
references: 14063318
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Oct 07;6(1):144
references: 24099439
references: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(14):5475-9
references: 20207135
references: Bioresour Technol. 2013 Mar;132:109-14
references: 23395763
references: Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):1447-57
references: 22433674
references: Bioresour Technol. 2013 Feb;130:30-7
references: 23298647
references: Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;114:365-9
references: 22516249
references: Bioresour Technol. 2012 May;111:215-21
references: 22386628
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009 Oct 15;104(3):471-82
references: 19591194
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Aug 1;97(5):1028-38
references: 17221887
references: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4851-61
references: 20042329
references: Biotechnol Adv. 2011 Nov-Dec;29(6):675-85
references: 21624451
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Jun 03;6(1):85
references: 23731756
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Oct;16(5):577-83
references: 16154338
references: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;23(3):396-405
references: 22176748
references: Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jun 03;7:82
references: 24920960
references: Bioresour Technol. 2013 Jul;139:272-9
references: 23665687
references: J Hazard Mater. 2009 Oct 15;170(1):366-73
references: 19464792
references: Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):1207-18
references: 22085593
references: Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011 Apr 7;48(4-5):408-15
references: 22112958
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):12591-9
references: 24053605
references: Bioresour Technol. 2013 Oct;145:103-7
references: 23489570
references: J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Oct 27;58(20):10893-8
references: 20882980
references: Int J Mol Sci. 2008 Sep;9(9):1621-51
references: 19325822
references: Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:41-65
references: 17646946
references: Bioresour Technol. 2010 Aug;101(15):6045-50
references: 20307975
references: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(4):3958-65
references: 21190846
references: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents
references: 12209002
references: Bioresour Technol. 2009 Nov;100(21):5140-5
references: 19540752