title: Demographic mechanisms of inbreeding adjustment through extra-pair reproduction.
abstract: One hypothesis explaining extra-pair reproduction is that socially monogamous females mate with extra-pair males to adjust the coefficient of inbreeding (f) of extra-pair offspring (EPO) relative to that of within-pair offspring (WPO) they would produce with their socially paired male. Such adjustment of offspring f requires non-random extra-pair reproduction with respect to relatedness, which is in turn often assumed to require some mechanism of explicit pre-copulatory or post-copulatory kin discrimination. We propose three demographic processes that could potentially cause mean f to differ between individual females' EPO and WPO given random extra-pair reproduction with available males without necessarily requiring explicit kin discrimination. Specifically, such a difference could arise if social pairings formed non-randomly with respect to relatedness or persisted non-randomly with respect to relatedness, or if the distribution of relatedness between females and their sets of potential mates changed during the period through which social pairings persisted. We used comprehensive pedigree and pairing data from free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to quantify these three processes and hence investigate how individual females could adjust mean offspring f through instantaneously random extra-pair reproduction. Female song sparrows tended to form social pairings with unrelated or distantly related males slightly less frequently than expected given random pairing within the defined set of available males. Furthermore, social pairings between more closely related mates tended to be more likely to persist across years than social pairings between less closely related mates. However, these effects were small and the mean relatedness between females and their sets of potential extra-pair males did not change substantially across the years through which social pairings persisted. Our framework and analyses illustrate how demographic and social structuring within populations might allow females to adjust mean f of offspring through random extra-pair reproduction without necessarily requiring explicit kin discrimination, implying that adjustment of offspring f might be an inevitable consequence of extra-pair reproduction. New theoretical and empirical studies are required to explore the general magnitude of such effects and quantify the degree to which they could facilitate or constrain long-term evolution of extra-pair reproduction.
authors: Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, Scotland.
authors: Jane M
authors: JM
authors: Reid
authors: Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, Scotland.
authors: A Bradley
authors: AB
authors: Duthie
authors: Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, Scotland.
authors: Matthew E
authors: ME
authors: Wolak
authors: Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4.
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Arcese
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D007178:Inbreeding; D008297:Male; D010375:Pedigree; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D046370:Sparrows / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: inbreeding avoidance; kinship; mate choice; mating system; paternity; pedigree; polyandry; sexual selection
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
references: 10740892
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 22;271(1535):159-64
references: 15058392
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 22;271(1553):2115-21
references: 15475330
references: Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):1-13
references: 16685634
references: Mol Ecol. 2006 Dec;15(14):4555-67
references: 17107482
references: Evolution. 2008 Mar;62(3):603-11
references: 18081715
references: Evolution. 2008 Apr;62(4):887-99
references: 18248635
references: Am Nat. 1998 Sep;152(3):380-92
references: 18811446
references: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):778-88
references: 19383076
references: Mol Ecol. 2010 Oct;19(19):4352-64
references: 20819155
references: Mol Ecol. 2011 Nov;20(22):4796-807
references: 22008256
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Jun 23;8(3):327-9
references: 22219391
references: J Evol Biol. 2012 Apr;25(4):716-25
references: 22321157
references: Mol Ecol. 2012 Mar;21(6):1487-99
references: 22335620
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;28(4):205-11
references: 23182684
references: Biol Lett. 2012 Dec 12;9(1):20121054
references: 23234867
references: Am Nat. 2013 Jun;181(6):E125-38
references: 23669548
references: J Evol Biol. 2013 Jul;26(7):1499-507
references: 23675879
references: Evolution. 2014 Mar;68(3):802-15
references: 24171712
references: Mol Ecol. 2014 Feb;23(3):721-32
references: 24354676
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Aug;29(8):456-64
references: 24909948
references: Evolution. 2015 Jan;69(1):59-74
references: 25346331
references: Evolution. 1998 Feb;52(1):240-250
references: 28568167
references: Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):737-740
references: 9784224