title: Do soil microbes and abrasion by soil particles influence persistence and loss of physical dormancy in seeds of tropical pioneers?
abstract: Germination from the soil seed bank (SSB) is an important determinant of species composition in tropical forest gaps, with seed persistence in the SSB allowing trees to recruit even decades after dispersal. The capacity to form a persistent SSB is often associated with physical dormancy, where seed coats are impermeable at the time of dispersal. Germination literature often speculates, without empirical evidence, that dormancy-break in physically dormant seeds is the result of microbial action and/or abrasion by soil particles. We tested the microbial/soil abrasion hypothesis in four widely distributed neotropical pioneer tree species (Apeiba membranacea, Luehea seemannii, Ochroma pyramidale, and Cochlospermum vitifolium). Seeds were buried in five common gardens in a lowland tropical forest in Panama, and recovered at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after burial. Seed permeability, microbial infection, seed coat thickness, and germination were measured. Parallel experiments compared the germination fraction of fresh and aged seeds without soil contact, and in seeds as a function of seed permeability. Contrary to the microbial/soil abrasion hypothesis the proportion of permeable seeds, and of seeds infected by cultivable microbes, decreased as a function of burial duration. Furthermore, seeds stored in dark and dry conditions for 2 years showed a higher proportion of seed germination than fresh seeds in identical germination conditions. We determined that permeable seeds of A. membranacea and O. pyramidale had cracks in the chalazal area or lacked the chalazal plug, whereas all surfaces of impermeable seeds were intact. Our results are inconsistent with the microbial/soil abrasion hypothesis of dormancy loss and instead suggest the existence of multiple dormancy phenotypes, where a fraction of each seed cohort is dispersed in a permeable state and germinates immediately, while the impermeable seed fraction accounts for the persistent SSB. Thus, we conclude that fluctuations in the soil temperature in the absence of soil abrasion and microbial infection are sufficient to break physical dormancy on seeds of tropical pioneer trees.
authors: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Ancon, Panama.
authors: Paul-Camilo
authors: PC
authors: Zalamea
authors: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Ancon, Panama.
authors: Carolina
authors: C
authors: Sarmiento
authors: School of Plant Sciences and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.
authors: A Elizabeth
authors: AE
authors: Arnold
authors: Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service Urbana, IL, USA.
authors: Adam S
authors: AS
authors: Davis
authors: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Ancon, Panama ; Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois Urbana, IL, USA.
authors: James W
authors: JW
authors: Dalling
keywords: Barro Colorado Island; germination cue; physical dormancy; pioneer plants; seed dormancy loss; seed persistence; soil seed bank
references: Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):582-8
references: 17503585
references: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015 Feb;90(1):31-59
references: 24618017
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2014 Jul;16(4):732-9
references: 24148161
references: Nature. 2014 Feb 6;506(7486):85-8
references: 24463522
references: Science. 1999 Jan 22;283(5401):554-7
references: 9915706
references: Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;4(5):656-71
references: 25035805
references: Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Feb;16(2):69-76
references: 21095155
references: Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(1):69-84
references: 23649182
references: Oecologia. 2014 Jan;174(1):33-44
references: 24002712
references: Mol Ecol. 2008 Aug;17(16):3707-16
references: 18627452
references: New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(2):496-503
references: 23421728
references: Am Nat. 2009 Apr;173(4):531-5
references: 19228112
references: Nature. 2000 Mar 30;404(6777):493-5
references: 10761916
references: J Plant Res. 2013 Sep;126(5):643-9
references: 23526153
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51523
references: 23227267
references: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jan;13(1):154-9
references: 21143736