title: Option generation in decision making: ideation beyond memory retrieval.
abstract: According to prescriptive decision theories, the generation of options for choice is a central aspect of decision making. A too narrow representation of the problem may indeed limit the opportunity to evaluate promising options. However, despite the theoretical and applied significance of this topic, the cognitive processes underlying option generation are still unclear. In particular, while a cued recall account of option generation emphasizes the role of memory and executive control, other theoretical proposals stress the importance of ideation processes based on various search and thinking processes. Unfortunately, relevant behavioral evidence on the cognitive processes underlying option generation is scattered and inconclusive. In order to reach a better understanding, we carried out an individual-differences study employing a wide array of cognitive predictors, including measures of episodic memory, semantic memory, cognitive control, and ideation fluency. The criterion tasks consisted of three different poorly-structured decision-making scenarios, and the participants were asked to generate options to solve these problems. The main criterion variable of the study was the number of valid options generated, but also the diversity and the quality of generated options were examined. The results showed that option generation fluency and diversity in the context of ill-structured decision making are supported by ideation ability even after taking into account the effects of individual differences in several other aspects of cognitive functioning. Thus, ideation processes, possibly supported by search and thinking processes, seem to contribute to option generation beyond basic associative memory retrieval. The findings of the study also indicate that generating more options may have multifaceted consequences for choice, increasing the quality of the best option generated but decreasing the mean quality of the options in the generated set.
authors: Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste Trieste, Italy ; Department of Psychology, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden.
authors: Fabio
authors: F
authors: Del Missier
authors: Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste Trieste, Italy.
authors: Mimì
authors: M
authors: Visentini
authors: Department of Psychology, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden.
authors: Timo
authors: T
authors: Mäntylä
keywords: decision making; decision structuring; ideation; memory; option generation
references: Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;115(1):155-85
references: 18211189
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov;40(6):1594-609
references: 24773286
references: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
references: 10945922
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jun;125(2):155-74
references: 16919591
references: Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):271-88
references: 20545413
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):794-809
references: 21381857
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 May;92(5):938-56
references: 17484614
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):45-6
references: 17188556
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Oct;1235:57-74
references: 22023568
references: Neuropsychologia. 2013 Mar;51(4):713-24
references: 23266766
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Apr;37(3):265-76
references: 19246342
references: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Oct;20(5):739-59
references: 20526955
references: Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):416-21
references: 19394922
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;18(4):320-5
references: 17470257
references: Br J Psychol. 2007 Nov;98(Pt 4):611-25
references: 17535464
references: Psychol Bull. 1994 Jul;116(1):46-54
references: 8078974
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1344-64
references: 23565790
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2013 Dec;13(4):814-29
references: 23712666
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 23;4:555
references: 23986737
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1089-96
references: 19586272
references: Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(7):757-70
references: 10408644
references: Cogn Process. 2011 Aug;12(3):289-300
references: 21461753
references: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(3):186-213
references: 16859437
references: Neuropsychology. 2002 Jul;16(3):309-21
references: 12146678
references: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Jul;1(4):613-21
references: 26271508
references: Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):172-9
references: 16466426
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Feb-Mar;115(2-3):235-54
references: 14962402