title: Negative pressure wound therapy augmented full-thickness free skin grafting in the cat: outcome in 10 grafts transferred to six cats.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this clinical evaluation was to describe the technique and outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) augmented skin grafting in cats.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cats with soft tissue and skin defects (n = 6) underwent open wound management. Wounds were initially covered using a NPWT system that was changed to polyurethane foam dressing once infection was controlled and granulation started. Final closure was achieved after establishment of a healthy, fully granulated wound bed by grafting of free full-thickness skin from the lateral abdominal wall. The freshly grafted skin was then treated with an NPWT dressing at a pressure of -125 mmHg for 3 days, with dressing changes performed daily. Percentage graft take, complications, wound bioburden and cosmetic outcome were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean duration of open wound management was 21.4 days (range 3.0-45.0 days), with a mean duration of NPWT of 8.0 days (range 3.0-14.0 days). Five cats received a single graft, while one cat had five grafts transferred to the right hindlimb. In 7/10 grafts, graft take was 100%, in two grafts take was 95% and in one graft take was 80% (mean take rate 97%). Therapy was well tolerated in all patients. The grafted site displayed normal hair regrowth in four cats, sparse hair regrowth in one and no hair growth at all in one patient. Skin sensation was normal in all grafted patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Skin graft augmentation using NPWT in cats is a feasible option that allows graft fixation, even in anatomically demanding areas. Graft take rate reported here is slightly higher than documented in previous reports.
authors: Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany m.nolff@lmu.de.
authors: Mirja C
authors: MC
authors: Nolff
authors: Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Meyer-Lindenberg
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001458:Bandages / Q000662:veterinary*; D002371:Cat Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D002415:Cats / Q000293:injuries*; D019468:Disease Management; D054843:Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016038:Skin Transplantation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D014945:Wound Healing
chemical_list: D011140:Polyurethanes; C028279:polyurethane foam
references: Vet Surg. 1993 Nov-Dec;22(6):436-43
references: 8116198
references: Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2004 Jun;146(6):277-83
references: 15248347
references: Vet Q. 1997 Apr;19(sup1):24-25
references: 22047418
references: Br J Plast Surg. 1969 Apr;22(2):125-33
references: 4891590
references: J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):e338-42
references: 24577227
references: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Jun 1;230(11):1669-73
references: 17542735
references: World J Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov 29;5:138
references: 18047659
references: Int Wound J. 2010 Dec;7(6):480-7
references: 20825510
references: Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):23-9
references: 23249474
references: J Small Anim Pract. 1999 Aug;40(8):378-82
references: 10476525
references: J Feline Med Surg. 2009 Sep;11(9):747-57
references: 19712893
references: J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Oct;20(10):675-9
references: 20943111
references: Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):700-5
references: 17060762
references: Ann Plast Surg. 2007 May;58(5):536-40
references: 17452839
references: Vet Surg. 2013 Jun;42(5):511-22
references: 23550662
references: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;39(7):699-704
references: 20413271