title: Habitat selection and consumption across a landscape of multiple predators.
abstract: Predator community composition can alter habitat quality for prey by changing the strength and direction of consumptive effects. Whether predator community composition also alters prey density via nonconsumptive effects during habitat selection is not well known, but is important for understanding how changes to predator communities will alter prey populations. We tested the hypothesis that predator community composition (presence of caged trout, caged dragonflies, or caged trout + dragonflies) alters colonization of aquatic mesocosms by ovipositing aquatic insects. In a previous experiment in this system, we found a spatial contagion effect, in which insects avoided pools with predators, but only when predator-free pools were isolated (∼5 m away from predator pools). Here, we removed the isolated predator-free pools, allowing us to test whether insects would make fine-scale (∼1 m) oviposition decisions in the absence of preferred isolated pools. We also estimated consumptive effects by allowing predators to feed on colonists for 5 days following colonization. All insects collected after 21 days were dipterans, dominated by Chironomidae. Total colonization, measured as the number of developing larvae after 21 days, was not affected by either predator presence or composition. Consumption was significant in the trout only treatment, reducing larval insect density by 46 ± 37% (mean ± SE). No other predator treatment significantly reduced prey density, although the proportion of chironomid larvae in protective cases increased in response to direct predation from dragonflies, indicating an antipredatory behavioral response. Taken together, these results reveal that predator community composition altered larval survival and behavior, but colonizing females either did not or could not assess these risks across small scales during oviposition.
authors: Department of Biology, University of South Dakota Vermillion, South Dakota, 57069.
authors: Jeff S
authors: JS
authors: Wesner
authors: Department of Biology, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 84602.
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Meyers
authors: Department of Biology, Brigham Young University - Idaho Rexburg, Idaho, 83460.
authors: Eric J
authors: EJ
authors: Billman
authors: Department of Biology, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 84602.
authors: Mark C
authors: MC
authors: Belk
keywords: Habitat selection; multiple predators; nonconsumptive effects; oviposition; spatial contagion
references: Oecologia. 2003 Jun;136(1):1-13
references: 12690550
references: Oecologia. 2004 Jan;138(2):300-5
references: 14648191
references: Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2415-26
references: 18027743
references: Am Nat. 1997 Dec;150(6):798-812
references: 18811337
references: Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):869-76
references: 19449679
references: Biol Lett. 2010 Aug 23;6(4):449-52
references: 20164083
references: J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):795-802
references: 20412346
references: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):480-6
references: 21352451
references: Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10
references: 21560670
references: Ecology. 2012 Jul;93(7):1674-82
references: 22919913
references: Oecologia. 2013 Nov;173(3):933-46
references: 23609801
references: Oecologia. 1987 Sep;73(2):236-241
references: 28312293
references: Oecologia. 2001 Sep;129(1):155-160
references: 28547063