title: Student feedback on problem-based learning processes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Problem-based learning (PBL) sessions consist of a brainstorming phase, search phase, individual study, and reporting phase. At the Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, PBL is a new learning modality first introduced in May 2013.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  PBL processes have not been studied previously at the Xavier University School of Medicine, hence the present study was carried out to obtain information about the PBL processes and note differences, if any, among different groups of students.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted among first- to fourth-semester undergraduate medical students during July 2014 using a previously validated PBL processes instrument developed by van den Hurk et al. Information about gender, semester, weekly hours of study, and learning resources used was obtained. Respondents' agreement with a set of 23 statements was noted using a Likert-type scale, which was scored as 1=totally disagree with the statement, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, and 5=totally agree with the statement. Mean scores were compared among different groups of respondents.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-one of the 58 students (87.9 per cent) participated. The weekly average study time was 29.9 hours. Lecture handouts and textbooks were commonly used information sources. The mean scores (scale 1 to 5) for learning-issue-driven searching, and extensiveness of searching were 3.49 and 3.45, respectively. The score for explanation-oriented preparation was 3.94, while those for breadth and depth of discussion were 3.75 and 3.62, respectively. Most scores were higher among second-semester students, but the difference was not significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The self-reported scores were comparable to those reported in previous studies done using the same PBL processes instrument in other medical schools. At Xavier University School of Medicine interactive lectures are the major teaching method and topics covered during PBL are also likely to be covered during lectures, which could influence the scores. The findings of our study providing information about how students function during PBL brainstorming and presentation sessions and how they use different learning resources would be of interest to other medical schools worldwide following a hybrid curriculum. Further studies are required.
authors: Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba.
authors: P Ravi
authors: PR
authors: Shankar
authors: Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba.
authors: Atanu
authors: A
authors: Nandy
keywords: Medical school; presentation; problem-based learning; reporting; search; self-directed learning
references: J Pak Med Assoc. 2006 Oct;56(10):430-2
references: 17144386
references: Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2014 Apr;8(2):125-32
references: 25246879
references: Med Teach. 2014 Jan;36(1):1-12
references: 24295273
references: Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1069-74
references: 24826850
references: J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar 24;11:5
references: 24699510
references: J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep 30;10:8
references: 24223238
references: BMC Med Educ. 2006 May 09;6:28
references: 16684347
references: J Pak Med Assoc. 2001 Aug;51(8):271-4
references: 11715887
references: Acad Med. 1992 Sep;67(9):557-65
references: 1520409
references: BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1874
references: 9224131
references: Med Educ. 2010 Sep;44(9):856-863
references: 20716095
references: Acad Med. 1993 Jan;68(1):52-81
references: 8447896
references: Med Educ. 2006 Sep;40(9):924-31
references: 16925644
references: Med Educ. 2011 Oct;45(10):973-86
references: 21916938
references: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Oct;16(4):491-503
references: 21547499
references: Med Educ. 1989 Nov;23(6):542-58
references: 2593886
references: BMC Med Educ. 2004 Jun 15;4:9
references: 15198805
references: Med Educ. 1994 Sep;28(5):372-80
references: 7845255
references: BMC Med Educ. 2004 Sep 22;4:16
references: 15385051