title: Reproductive Performance of Holstein Dairy Cows Grazing in Dry-summer Subtropical Climatic Conditions: Effect of Heat Stress and Heat Shock on Meiotic Competence and In vitro Fertilization.
abstract: The present study was designed to evaluate how environmental factors in a dry-summer subtropical climate in Terceira-Azores (situated in the North Atlantic Ocean: 38° 43' N 27° 12' W) can affect dairy cow (Holstein) fertility, as well as seasonal influence on in vitro oocytes maturation and embryos development. Impact of heat shock (HS) effects on in vitro oocyte's maturation and further embryo development after in vitro fertilization (IVF) was also evaluated. For such purpose the result of the first artificial insemination (AI) performed 60 to 90 days after calving of 6,300 cows were recorded for one year. In parallel, climatic data was obtained at different elevation points (n = 5) from 0 to 1,000 m and grazing points from 0 to 500 m, in Terceira island, and the temperature humidity index (THI) was calculated. For in vitro experiments, oocytes (n = 706) were collected weekly during all year, for meiotic maturation and IVF. Further, to evaluate HS effect, 891 oocytes were collected in the cold moths (December, January, February and March) and divided in three groups treated to HS for 24 h during in vitro maturation at: C (Control = 38.5°C), HS1 (39.5°C) and HS2 (40.5°C). Oocytes from each group were used for meiotic assessment and IVF. Cleavage, morula and blastocyst development were evaluated respectively on day 2, 6, and 9 after IVF. A negative correlation between cow's conception rate (CR) and THI in grazing points (-91.3%; p<0.001) was observed. Mean THI in warmer months (June, July, August and September) was 71.7±0.7 and the CR (40.2±1.5%) while in cold months THI was 62.8±0.2 and CR was 63.8±0.4%. A similar impact was obtained with in vitro results in which nuclear maturation rate (NMR) ranged from 78.4% (±8.0) to 44.3% (±8.1), while embryos development ranged from 53.8% (±5.8) to 36.3% (±3.3) in cold and warmer months respectively. In vitro HS results showed a significant decline (p<0.05) on NMR of oocytes for every 1°C rising temperature (78.4±8.0, 21.7±3.1 and 8.9±2.2, respectively for C, HS1, and HS2). Similar results were observed in cleavage rate and embryo development, showing a clear correlation (96.9 p<0.05) between NMR and embryo development with respect to temperatures. Results clearly demonstrated that, up to a THI of 70.6, a decrease in the CR occurs in first AI after calving; this impairment was confirmed with in vitro results.
authors: Department of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt .
authors: Krishna
authors: K
authors: Pavani
authors: Department of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt .
authors: Isabel
authors: I
authors: Carvalhais
authors: Department of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt .
authors: Marwa
authors: M
authors: Faheem
authors: Department of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt .
authors: Antonio
authors: A
authors: Chaveiro
authors: Centre of Climate, Meteorology and Global Change of the University of the Azores, Angra do Heroísmo 9700-042, Portugal .
authors: Francisco Vieira
authors: FV
authors: Reis
authors: Department of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 12613 Giza, Egypt .
authors: Fernando Moreira
authors: FM
authors: da Silva
keywords: Artificial Insemination; Environmental Stress; Heat Shock; Maternal Heat Stress; Oocyte Meiotic Maturation
references: Dev Biol. 1994 Sep;165(1):95-104
references: 8088454
references: J Reprod Fertil. 2000 Sep;120(1):83-90
references: 11006149
references: J Exp Biol. 2010 Jun 15;213(Pt 12):2125-30
references: 20511527
references: Theriogenology. 2007 May;67(8):1379-85
references: 17412409
references: Biol Reprod. 2004 Dec;71(6):1898-906
references: 15306551
references: Reproduction. 2001 Nov;122(5):737-44
references: 11690534
references: Dev Growth Differ. 1997 Oct;39(5):607-15
references: 9338596
references: J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2383-92
references: 21524528
references: Theriogenology. 2003 Oct 1;60(6):1139-51
references: 12935853
references: Theriogenology. 2013 Jan 15;79(2):299-305
references: 23174769
references: J Dairy Sci. 2006 Apr;89(4):1244-53
references: 16537957
references: Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2374-8
references: 11679523
references: Theriogenology. 2008 Jan 15;69(2):155-66
references: 17953981
references: J Dairy Sci. 2004 Aug;87(8):2449-54
references: 15328267
references: Reproduction. 2001 Jul;122(1):155-63
references: 11425340
references: Theriogenology. 1988 Aug;30(2):195-209
references: 16726462
references: Reprod Domest Anim. 2004 Jun;39(3):146-53
references: 15182290
references: Mol Reprod Dev. 1997 Feb;46(2):138-45
references: 9021745
references: Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 May;125(1-4):49-55
references: 21411252
references: Biol Reprod. 1994 Jan;50(1):103-10
references: 8312433
references: Reproduction. 2005 Feb;129(2):235-44
references: 15695618
references: Theriogenology. 2001 Jan 1;55(1):91-103
references: 11198091
references: J Anim Sci. 1987 May;64(5):1512-8
references: 3583955
references: J Dairy Sci. 1985 Jan;68(1):78-85
references: 3980812
references: Theriogenology. 2004 Sep 15;62(6):1131-43
references: 15289052
references: Zygote. 1997 Nov;5(4):371-6
references: 9563685
references: J Dairy Sci. 1992 Nov;75(11):2976-83
references: 1460129
references: J Anim Sci. 2002 Dec;80(12):3053-9
references: 12542143
references: Physiol Genomics. 2006 Dec 13;28(1):84-96
references: 17018689
references: J Dairy Sci. 1993 Oct;76(10):2899-905
references: 8227617
references: Theriogenology. 1993 Apr;39(4):797-810
references: 16727254
references: Biol Reprod. 2004 Oct;71(4):1303-8
references: 15201201
references: J Dairy Sci. 1999 Dec;82(12):2611-6
references: 10629807
references: J Dairy Sci. 2005 Dec;88(12):4326-33
references: 16291624