title: Comparability of the national board of medical examiners comprehensive clinical science examination and a set of five clinical science subject examinations.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Accreditation standards require medical schools to use comparable assessment methods to ensure students in rotation-based clerkships and longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) achieve the same learning objectives. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Clinical Science Subject Examinations (subject exams) are commonly used, but an integrated examination like the NBME Comprehensive Clinical Science Examination (CCSE) may be better suited for LICs. This study examined the comparability of the CCSE and five commonly required subject exams.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 2009-2010, third-year medical students in rotation-based clerkships at the University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine completed subject exams in medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery for summative purposes following each rotation and a year-end CCSE for formative purposes. Data for 205 students were analyzed to determine the relationship between scores on the CCSE (and its five discipline subscales) and the five subject exams and the impact of clerkship rotation order.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The correlation between the CCSE score and the average score on the five subject exams was high (0.80-0.93). Four subject exam scores were significant predictors of the CCSE score, and scores on the subject exams explained 65%-87% of CCSE score variance. Scores on each subject exam-but not rotation order-were statistically significant in predicting corresponding CCSE discipline subscale scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results provide evidence that these five subject exams and the CCSE measure similar constructs. This suggests that assessment of clerkship-year students' knowledge using the CCSE is comparable to assessment using this set of subject exams.
authors: L.N. Peterson is adjunct professor, Department of Cellular Physiological Sciences, and senior evaluation advisor, Evaluation Studies Unit, Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. S.A. Rusticus is statistical analyst, Evaluation Studies Unit, Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. L.P. Ross is senior psychometrician, Scoring Services Unit of Professional Services, National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
authors: Linda N
authors: LN
authors: Peterson
authors: Shayna A
authors: SA
authors: Rusticus
authors: Linette P
authors: LP
authors: Ross
mesh_terms: D001955:British Columbia; D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000379:methods*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D015510:Clinical Medicine / Q000193:education*; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods*; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012577:Schools, Medical; D013337:Students, Medical