title: Knowledge and perceptions of the intrauterine device among family planning providers in Nepal: a cross-sectional analysis by cadre and sector.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Nepal has high unmet need for family planning and low use of intrauterine devices (IUDs). While clients' attitudes toward the IUD are known in a variety of contexts, little is known about providers' knowledge and perceptions of the IUD in developing countries. Nepal's liberal IUD service provision policies allow the opportunity to explore provider knowledge and perceptions across cadres and sectors. This research contributes to an understanding of providers' IUD perceptions in low-resource environments, and increases evidence for IUD task-sharing and private sector involvement.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire was administered to 345 nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) affiliated with the private Mahila Swastha Sewa (MSS) franchise, public sector, or private non-franchise sector. All providers had been trained in TCu 380A IUD insertion and removal. The questionnaire captured providers' IUD experience, knowledge, and perceived barriers to recommendation. Descriptive, multivariate linear, and multinomial logistic regression was conducted, comparing providers between cadre and sector.
  
  
  RESULTS
  On average, providers answered 21.5 of 35 questions correctly, for a score of 61.4%. Providers scored the lowest on IUD medical eligibility, answering 5.9 of 14 questions correctly. Over 50% of providers were able to name the four side effects most frequently associated with the IUD; however, one-third of all providers found at least one of these side effects unacceptable. Adjusted results show that cadre does not significantly impact provider's IUD knowledge scores or side effect perceptions. Public sector affiliation was associated with higher knowledge scores regarding personal characteristic eligibility and more negative perceptions of two normal IUD side effects. IUD knowledge is significantly associated with provider's recent training and employment at multiple facilities, and side effect perceptions are significantly associated with client volume, range of family planning methods, and region.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Provider knowledge and attitudes towards IUD provision are similar across cadre and sector, supporting WHO task-sharing guidelines and validating Nepal's family planning policies. However, overall provider knowledge is low. We recommend that providers need to receive further training and support to improve knowledge, manage side effects, and recognize women in periods of high unmet need--such as post-partum or post-abortion women--as suitable candidates for IUDs.
authors: Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA. nchakraborty@psi.org.
authors: Nirali M
authors: NM
authors: Chakraborty
authors: Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA. cait.m.murphy@gmail.com.
authors: Caitlin
authors: C
authors: Murphy
authors: Population Services International, Kathmandu, Nepal. mahesh@psi.org.np.
authors: Mahesh
authors: M
authors: Paudel
authors: Helen Keller International Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal. srijusharma@gmail.com.
authors: Sriju
authors: S
authors: Sharma
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003906:Developing Countries / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005193:Family Planning Services / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007434:Intrauterine Devices / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009390:Nepal; D011247:Pregnancy
references: BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):799-803
references: 11588088
references: Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;35(4):169-73
references: 12941649
references: Contraception. 2006 Jun;73(6):628-33
references: 16730497
references: Contraception. 2006 Nov;74(5):382-8
references: 17046379
references: Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Apr;19(2):68-73
references: 17277011
references: Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):761-7
references: 18667892
references: Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):197-200
references: 18692608
references: Contraception. 2010 Apr;81(4):292-8
references: 20227544
references: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;50(2):184-8
references: 20522078
references: Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):121-37
references: 20634208
references: Contraception. 2011 Feb;83(2):145-50
references: 21237340
references: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Jul;114(1):64-8
references: 21543069
references: Reprod Health. 2011 Dec 30;8:40
references: 22208449
references: Acad Med. 1990 Oct;65(10):611-21
references: 2261032
references: Stud Fam Plann. 1989 Jan-Feb;20(1):38-52
references: 2785301
references: WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012 Jul-Sep;1(3):309-319
references: 28615557
references: Stud Fam Plann. 1983 Feb;14(2):43-7
references: 6836665
references: Adv Contracept. 1998 Mar;14(1):27-39
references: 9587006