title: Is higher placement stability in kinship foster care by virtue or design?
abstract: Prior research has repeatedly documented higher placement stability for children who enter kinship care rather than non-relative foster care. However, little is known about why, and under what circumstances, kinship care is more stable. This study uses longitudinal state administrative data to explore possible explanations. Results suggest that, while children in non-relative foster care are indeed at higher risk of any placement move than their peers in kinship care, this appears to be partly driven by child selection factors and policy preferences for kinship care. That is, the gap is not explained primarily by different rates of caregiver-requested moves. However, the gap was sizably smaller among select high-risk subgroups of foster children, suggesting that higher stability in kinship care may be partly explained by differences in the characteristics of children entering kinship care (versus non-relative foster care). Moreover, a large portion of the gap is explained by children in non-relative care being moved into kinship care; a move that is likely the result of policy preferences for kinship care rather than a defect in the initial placement. In sum, these results suggest that kinship care provides only a limited stability advantage, and the reasons for that advantage are not well understood.
authors: University of Texas at Austin, Population Research Center, 1 University Station A2702, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
authors: Sarah A
authors: SA
authors: Font
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D017028:Caregivers / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005581:Foster Home Care / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D010290:Parents / Q000523:psychology; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D014922:Wisconsin
keywords: Foster care; Kinship care; Placement stability; Policy preferences
references: Child Dev. 2014 Sep-Oct;85(5):2074-90
references: 24646297
references: Child Welfare. 2000 Sep-Oct;79(5):614-32
references: 11021350
references: Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Apr;30(4):409-24
references: 16600372
references: Br J Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;170:541-8
references: 9330021
references: Hum Nat. 2005 Mar;16(1):1-31
references: 26189514
references: Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Oct;24(10):1363-74
references: 11075702
references: Child Welfare. 2008;87(5):107-24
references: 19402362
references: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;14(4):200-7
references: 15981131
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;42(6):785-90
references: 11583251
references: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Jun;162(6):550-6
references: 18524746
references: Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1467-77
references: 11699682
references: Child Dev. 2015 Mar-Apr;86(2):536-56
references: 25521556
references: Infant Ment Health J. 2011;32(2):251-262
references: 22140289
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006546
references: 19160287