title: Predicting Improvement in Depression Across Therapies Using Indicators of Romantic Relationship Functioning: A Preliminary Investigation.
abstract: Depression is a common presenting problem, often affected by couple interactions in unique ways. However, research in the area of romantic relationship functioning and depression often replicates previous research or consists of literature reviews, limiting the clinical relevancy. The purpose of this preliminary study is to expand the research on the effects of relational processes on depression treatment outcomes. We tested whether initiator tendency, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and marital satisfaction predicted improvement in depression for women with Major Depressive Disorder enrolled in a depression treatment clinical trial (n = 17). Women completed treatments of either pharmacotherapy or combined Emotionally Focused Therapy for couples and pharmacotherapy. We found that higher baseline levels of partner initiator tendency resulted in less change in depression (worse outcomes), regardless of treatment type and that higher baseline levels of attachment avoidance predicted better depression outcomes in treatment. Marital satisfaction, however, was not linked to change in depression. Initiator tendency is discussed as a critical romantic relationship factor for depression treatment outcomes.
authors: Texas Woman's University.
authors: Sarah B
authors: SB
authors: Woods
authors: University of Iowa.
authors: Jacob B
authors: JB
authors: Priest
authors: Florida State University.
authors: Wayne H
authors: WH
authors: Denton
keywords: Couples; Depression; Initiator Tendency; Outcome Research
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):674-8
references: 10609431
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1989 Aug;98(3):229-35
references: 2768657
references: Psychol Med. 2004 May;34(4):643-58
references: 15099419
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):310-20
references: 8636884
references: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Aug;18(8):1245-57
references: 19630553
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 1999 Nov;108(4):701-6
references: 10609435
references: J Marital Fam Ther. 2000 Jan;26(1):51-63
references: 10685352
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;79(6):953-61
references: 11138764
references: Cogn Emot. 2011 Dec;25(8):1439-59
references: 21432644
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Dec;64(6):1417-24
references: 8991328
references: Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):615-25
references: 21443364
references: Psychol Med. 2005 May;35(5):693-704
references: 15918346
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Feb;66(2):413-24
references: 8195994
references: J Fam Psychol. 2002 Mar;16(1):26-37
references: 11915407
references: Br J Psychiatry. 1976 Aug;129:125-37
references: 963348
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;57(3):223-8
references: 15066681
references: Psychiatry. 1976 Feb;39(1):28-40
references: 1257353
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1089-99
references: 19968385
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jan;66(1):127-40
references: 8126643
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Feb;69(1):125-9
references: 11302269
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Aug;116(3):638-43
references: 17696721
references: J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jun;38 Suppl 1:23-38
references: 22765322