title: A Systematic Review of the Comparative Epidemiology of Avian and Human Influenza A H5N1 and H7N9 - Lessons and Unanswered Questions.
abstract: The aim of this work was to explore the comparative epidemiology of influenza viruses, H5N1 and H7N9, in both bird and human populations. Specifically, the article examines similarities and differences between the two viruses in their genetic characteristics, distribution patterns in human and bird populations and postulated mechanisms of global spread. In summary, H5N1 is pathogenic in birds, while H7N9 is not. Yet both have caused sporadic human cases, without evidence of sustained, human-to-human spread. The number of H7N9 human cases in the first year following its emergence far exceeded that of H5N1 over the same time frame. Despite the higher incidence of H7N9, the spatial distribution of H5N1 within a comparable time frame is considerably greater than that of H7N9, both within China and globally. The pattern of spread of H5N1 in humans and birds around the world is consistent with spread through wild bird migration and poultry trade activities. In contrast, human cases of H7N9 and isolations of H7N9 in birds and the environment have largely occurred in a number of contiguous provinces in south-eastern China. Although rates of contact with birds appear to be similar in H5N1 and H7N9 cases, there is a predominance of incidental contact reported for H7N9 as opposed to close, high-risk contact for H5N1. Despite the high number of human cases of H7N9 and the assumed transmission being from birds, the corresponding level of H7N9 virus in birds in surveillance studies has been low, particularly in poultry farms. H7N9 viruses are also diversifying at a much greater rate than H5N1 viruses. Analyses of certain H7N9 strains demonstrate similarities with engineered transmissible H5N1 viruses which make it more adaptable to the human respiratory tract. These differences in the human and bird epidemiology of H5N1 and H7N9 raise unanswered questions as to how H7N9 has spread, which should be investigated further.
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. chau.bui@unsw.edu.au.
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Bui
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Bethmont
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: A A
authors: AA
authors: Chughtai
authors: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Gardner
authors: Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Sarkar
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Hassan
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Seale
authors: School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors: C R
authors: CR
authors: MacIntyre
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild; D001717:Birds / Q000821:virology; D002681:China / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D053124:Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype / Q000302:isolation & purification; D064766:Influenza A Virus, H7N9 Subtype / Q000302:isolation & purification; D005585:Influenza in Birds / Q000453:epidemiology*; D007251:Influenza, Human / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011200:Poultry
keywords: H5N1; H7N9; avian influenza epidemiology; exposure; poultry; transmission