title: Knowledge of the animal welfare act and animal welfare regulations influences attitudes toward animal research.
abstract: Recent public-opinion polls indicate that Americans have shown a decline in support for animal experimentation, and several reports suggest a relationship between people's knowledge of animal welfare regulations and their attitudes toward animal research. Therefore, this study was designed to assess respondent's knowledge of several provisions in the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) and Animal Welfare Regulations (AWR), and determine whether exposure to elements of this legislation would influence an individual's attitudes toward the use of animals in research. A survey was used to assess knowledge of animal research regulations and attitudes toward animal research from a sample of individuals recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing marketplace. Results from study 1 confirmed the hypothesis that respondents had little knowledge of various federal regulations that govern animal research activities. Data from study 2 revealed that exposure to elements of the AWA and AWR influenced participants' attitudes toward the use of animals in research. These results suggest that providing information to the general public about the AWA and AWR that protect laboratory animals from abuse and neglect may help alleviate concerns about using animals in research settings.
authors: Department of Psychology, Ashland University, Ashland, Ohio, USA. mmetzger@ashland.edu.
authors: Mitchell M
authors: MM
authors: Metzger
mesh_terms: D032761:Animal Experimentation; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D000818:Animals; D001290:Attitude; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012108:Research Personnel; D018634:Veterinarians
references: Vet Rec. 2000 Jun 24;146(26):757-60
references: 10909909
references: J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2014 Mar 15;12(2):A154-8
references: 24693263
references: Psychol Rep. 1995 Feb;76(1):23-31
references: 7770575
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5
references: 26162106
references: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):65-72
references: 26158671
references: Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):1-23
references: 21717266