title: Relative abundance of and composition within fungal orders differ between cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) and sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate)-associated soils.
abstract: Nonnative Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass) is decimating sagebrush steppe, one of the largest ecosystems in the Western United States, and is causing regional-scale shifts in the predominant plant-fungal interactions. Sagebrush, a native perennial, hosts arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), whereas cheatgrass, a winter annual, is a relatively poor host of AMF. This shift is likely intertwined with decreased carbon (C)-sequestration in cheatgrass-invaded soils and alterations in overall soil fungal community composition and structure, but the latter remain unresolved. We examined soil fungal communities using high throughput amplicon sequencing (ribosomal large subunit gene) in the 0-4 cm and 4-8 cm depth intervals of six cores from cheatgrass- and six cores from sagebrush-dominated soils. Sagebrush core surfaces (0-4 cm) contained higher nitrogen and total C than cheatgrass core surfaces; these differences mirrored the presence of glomalin related soil proteins (GRSP), which has been associated with AMF activity and increased C-sequestration. Fungal richness was not significantly affected by vegetation type, depth or an interaction of the two factors. However, the relative abundance of seven taxonomic orders was significantly affected by vegetation type or the interaction between vegetation type and depth. Teloschistales, Spizellomycetales, Pezizales and Cantharellales were more abundant in sagebrush libraries and contain mycorrhizal, lichenized and basal lineages of fungi. Only two orders (Coniochaetales and Sordariales), which contain numerous economically important pathogens and opportunistic saprotrophs, were more abundant in cheatgrass libraries. Pleosporales, Agaricales, Helotiales and Hypocreales were most abundant across all libraries, but the number of genera detected within these orders was as much as 29 times lower in cheatgrass relative to sagebrush libraries. These compositional differences between fungal communities associated with cheatgrass- and sagebrush-dominated soils warrant future research to examine soil fungal community composition across more sites and time points as well as in association with native grass species that also occupy cheatgrass-invaded ecosystems.
authors: Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America.
authors: Carolyn F
authors: CF
authors: Weber
authors: Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America.
authors: Gary M
authors: GM
authors: King
authors: Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, United States of America.
authors: Ken
authors: K
authors: Aho
mesh_terms: D019306:Artemisia; D031724:Bromus; D017753:Ecosystem; D058865:Introduced Species; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012987:Soil; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D012987:Soil
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Apr;68(4):1854-63
references: 11916705
references: Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):603-15
references: 16602290
references: Microb Ecol. 2007 May;53(4):579-90
references: 17410394
references: ISME J. 2007 May;1(1):28-37
references: 18043611
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2805-13
references: 18344349
references: ISME J. 2008 Aug;2(8):805-14
references: 18615117
references: Ecol Lett. 2009 May;12(5):452-61
references: 19320689
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
references: 19801464
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Feb;76(4):999-1007
references: 20023089
references: ISME J. 2010 Jul;4(7):872-81
references: 20220789
references: Mycologia. 2011 Jan-Feb;103(1):10-21
references: 20943560
references: Mycologia. 2002 Sep-Oct;94(5):761-71
references: 21156550
references: Trends Microbiol. 2011 Feb;19(2):75-84
references: 21167717
references: PLoS Genet. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002230
references: 21876677
references: New Phytol. 2012 Mar;193(4):970-84
references: 22150759
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(5):1523-33
references: 22194300
references: Mycorrhiza. 2013 Feb;23(2):129-41
references: 22864708
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Dec;78(24):8587-94
references: 23023755
references: PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(12):e1003037
references: 23236275
references: New Phytol. 2013 Jul;199(1):241-51
references: 23550706
references: Front Microbiol. 2013 Apr 09;4:78
references: 23641237
references: Mycorrhiza. 2014 May;24(4):301-14
references: 24249492
references: Oecologia. 1993 Jun;94(3):314-317
references: 28313666