title: Visual attention in mixed-gender groups.
abstract: A basic principle of objectification theory is that a mere glance from a stranger represents the potential to be sexualized, triggering women to take on the perspective of others and become vigilant to their appearance. However, research has yet to document gendered gaze patterns in social groups. The present study examined visual attention in groups of varying gender composition to understand how gender and minority status influence gaze behavior. One hundred undergraduates enrolled in psychology courses were photographed, and an additional 76 participants viewed groupings of these photographs while their point of gaze was recorded using a remote eye-tracking device. Participants were not told that their gaze was being recorded. Women were viewed more frequently and for longer periods of time than men in mixed-gender groups. Women were also more likely to be looked at first and last by observers. Men spent more time attending to pictures of women when fewer women were in the group. The opposite effect was found for pictures of men, such that male pictures were viewed less when fewer pictures of men were in the group. Female observers spent more time looking at men compared to male observers, and male observers spent more time looking at women than female observers, though both female and male observers looked at women more than men overall. Consistent with objectification theory, women's appearance garners more attention and interest in mixed-gender social groups.
authors: Department of Psychology, Center for Cognition, Action, and Perception, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA.
authors: Mary Jean
authors: MJ
authors: Amon
keywords: eye tracking; gaze; gender; group dynamics; objectification; social cognition
references: Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):312-8
references: 23341162
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Feb;21(2):178-82
references: 20424041
references: Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):204-32
references: 8483982
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Oct;87(4):494-509
references: 15491274
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):111-27
references: 18605855
references: Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):469-71
references: 22477107
references: Perception. 1995;24(11):1297-313
references: 8643334
references: Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jun;51(7):1161-8
references: 23603242
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):616-26
references: 14561116
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):1317-22
references: 14608360
references: Int J Eat Disord. 2001 Jan;29(1):65-70
references: 11135335
references: Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):460-4
references: 12219814
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):50-59
references: 10652522
references: Psychol Bull. 1986 Jul;100(1):78-100
references: 3526377
references: Evol Hum Behav. 2007 Sep;28(5):359-364
references: 17948071
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct;18(10):879-85
references: 17894605
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Aug;23(4):573-87; discussion 587-644
references: 11301543
references: Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):120-7
references: 25014360