title: SHINKEI--a novel 3D isotropic MR neurography technique: technical advantages over 3DIRTSE-based imaging.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Technical assessment of SHINKEI pulse sequence and conventional 3DIRTSE for LS plexus MR neurography.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-one MR neurography examinations of the LS plexus were performed at 3 T, using 1.5-mm isotropic 3DIRTSE and SHINKEI sequences. Images were evaluated for motion and pulsation artefacts, nerve signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, nerve-to-fat ratio, muscle-to-fat ratio, fat suppression homogeneity and depiction of LS plexus branches. Paired Student t test was used to assess differences in nerve conspicuity (p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant). ICC correlation was obtained for intraobserver performance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Four examinations were excluded due to prior spine surgery. Bowel motion artefacts, pulsation artefacts, heterogeneous fat saturation and patient motion were seen in 16/17, 0/17, 17/17, 2/17 on 3DIRTSE and 0/17, 0/17, 0/17, 1/17 on SHINKEI. SHINKEI performed better (p < 0.01) for nerve signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, nerve-to-fat and muscle-to-fat ratios. 3DIRTSE and SHINKEI showed all LS plexus nerve roots, sciatic and femoral nerves. Smaller branches including obturator, lateral femoral cutaneous and iliohypogastric nerves were seen in 10/17, 5/17, 1/17 on 3DIRTSE and 17/17, 16/17, 7/17 on SHINKEI. Intraobserver reliability was excellent.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  SHINKEI MRN demonstrates homogeneous and superior fat suppression with increased nerve signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios resulting in better conspicuity of smaller LS plexus branches.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  • SHINKEI provides homogeneous and superior fat suppression, shown by higher nerve and muscle-to-fat ratios. • SHINKEI shows better nerve signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios than 3DIRTSE. • SHINKEI enables nerve-selective images with increased conspicuity of smaller LS plexus branches. • SHINKEI should be considered in routine MR neurography of the LS plexus.
authors: Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9178, USA, Jared.Kasper@utsouthwestern.edu.
authors: Jared M
authors: JM
authors: Kasper
authors: Vibhor
authors: V
authors: Wadhwa
authors: Kelly M
authors: KM
authors: Scott
authors: Shai
authors: S
authors: Rozen
authors: Yin
authors: Y
authors: Xi
authors: Avneesh
authors: A
authors: Chhabra
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008160:Lumbosacral Plexus / Q000473:pathology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D015588:Observer Variation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 May;200(5):1106-14
references: 23617497
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):486-97
references: 22976233
references: Neurol Clin. 2004 Aug;22(3):643-82, vi-vii
references: 15207879
references: Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(2):111-9
references: 23666153
references: Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014 Feb;24(1):245-56
references: 24210323
references: Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):1018-23
references: 18180925
references: Neurosurgery. 1996 Oct;39(4):750-6; discussion 756-7
references: 8880769
references: J Neurosurg. 1996 Aug;85(2):299-309
references: 8755760
references: Radiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:809568
references: 23589774
references: Eur J Radiol. 2010 May;74(2):403-10
references: 20223611