title: Bridging the gap: a roadmap to breaking the biological design barrier.
abstract: This paper presents an analysis of an emerging bottleneck in organism engineering, and paths by which it may be overcome. Recent years have seen the development of a profusion of synthetic biology tools, largely falling into two categories: high-level "design" tools aimed at mapping from organism specifications to nucleic acid sequences implementing those specifications, and low-level "build and test" tools aimed at faster, cheaper, and more reliable fabrication of those sequences and assays of their behavior in engineered biological organisms. Between the two families, however, there is a major gap: we still largely lack the predictive models and component characterization data required to effectively determine which of the many possible candidate sequences considered in the design phase are the most likely to produce useful results when built and tested. As low-level tools continue to mature, the bottleneck in biological systems engineering is shifting to be dominated by design, making this gap a critical barrier to progress. Considering how to address this gap, we find that widespread adoption of readily available analytic and assay methods is likely to lead to rapid improvement in available predictive models and component characterization models, as evidenced by a number of recent results. Such an enabling development is, in turn, likely to allow high-level tools to break the design barrier and support rapid development of transformative biological applications.
authors: Raytheon BBN Technologies , Cambridge, MA , USA.
authors: Jacob
authors: J
authors: Beal
keywords: automation; calibrated flow cytometry; design; metrology; organism engineering; prediction; synthetic biology
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W40-7
references: 19429897
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2012 Jan 20;1(1):14-21
references: 23651006
references: Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):224-30
references: 12432407
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:143
references: 18004276
references: Nature. 2008 Nov 27;456(7221):516-9
references: 18971928
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Aug;76(2 Pt 1):021122
references: 17930021
references: Cell. 2009 Jun 26;137(7):1272-81
references: 19563759
references: Nature. 2010 Jan 21;463(7279):288-90
references: 20090726
references: Physiol Rev. 2010 Jul;90(3):1103-63
references: 20664080
references: Bioessays. 2010 Apr;32(4):322-31
references: 20217844
references: Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:563-90
references: 20367033
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Feb;42(4):2646-59
references: 24234441
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Feb;7(2):e1001083
references: 21399700
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22490
references: 21850228
references: Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):339-42
references: 10659857
references: Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):441-4
references: 20154731
references: PLoS One. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e18882
references: 21559524
references: Science. 2013 May 3;340(6132):599-603
references: 23539178
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 May;27(5):465-71
references: 19377462
references: Nature. 2000 Jan 20;403(6767):335-8
references: 10659856
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012 Aug;16(3-4):285-91
references: 22673064
references: J Biol Eng. 2009 Mar 20;3:4
references: 19298678
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jul;26(7):787-93
references: 18612302
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Mar;77(3 Pt 1):031118
references: 18517340
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(8):e61
references: 17405768
references: Nat Methods. 2014 Jul;11(7):723-6
references: 24797424
references: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Aug 6;6 Suppl 4:S437-50
references: 19369220
references: Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2004 Jan;57(1):1-6
references: 14696057
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Nov;30(11):1137-42
references: 23034349
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2013 May 17;2(5):263-73
references: 23654271
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2015 Jan 16;4(1):48-56
references: 24877739
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov 1;39(20):e138
references: 21865275
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2009 Oct;27(10):946-50
references: 19801975
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2013 May 17;2(5):216-22
references: 23654257
references: Cytometry. 2001 Nov 1;45(3):194-205
references: 11746088
references: Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011 Apr;15(2):201-10
references: 21185770
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2015 Jun 19;4(6):673-81
references: 25369267
references: Nat Chem Biol. 2014 Feb;10(2):99-105
references: 24316737
references: Nat Methods. 2013 Apr;10(4):354-60
references: 23474465
references: Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):1185-94
references: 22008973
references: J Vis Exp. 2013 Sep 16;(79):e50762
references: 24084388
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Jul;38(Web Server issue):W138-43
references: 20435670
references: Trends Biotechnol. 2012 Feb;30(2):120-6
references: 22001068
references: J R Soc Interface. 2009 Aug 6;6 Suppl 4:S493-506
references: 19474079
references: Nat Methods. 2012 Nov;9(11):1088-94
references: 23023598
references: Genome Res. 2004 Nov;14(11):2367-76
references: 15520298
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110(34):14024-9
references: 23924614
references: Science. 2004 Jan 9;303(5655):158-61
references: 14715986
references: Cytometry A. 2012 Sep;81(9):785-96
references: 22915363
references: Curr Protoc Cytom. 2002 Dec;Chapter 1:Unit 1.14
references: 18770762
references: Cytometry A. 2008 Apr;73(4):279-88
references: 18163471
references: ACS Synth Biol. 2012 Aug 17;1(8):332-44
references: 23651287
references: Metab Eng. 2011 Jul;13(4):435-44
references: 21292021
references: Science. 2005 Mar 25;307(5717):1962-5
references: 15790856
references: Metab Eng. 2012 May;14(3):205-11
references: 22227399
references: Nature. 2011 Apr 28;472(7344):499-503
references: 21478873