title: The impact of covariate adjustment at randomization and analysis for binary outcomes: understanding differences between superiority and noninferiority trials.
abstract: The question of when to adjust for important prognostic covariates often arises in the design of clinical trials, and there remain various opinions on whether to adjust during both randomization and analysis, at randomization alone, or at analysis alone. Furthermore, little is known about the impact of covariate adjustment in the context of noninferiority (NI) designs. The current simulation-based research explores this issue in the NI setting, as compared with the typical superiority setting, by assessing the differential impact on power, type I error, and bias in the treatment estimate as well as its standard error, in the context of logistic regression under both simple and covariate adjusted permuted block randomization algorithms. In both the superiority and NI settings, failure to adjust for covariates that influence outcome in the analysis phase, regardless of prior adjustment at randomization, results in treatment estimates that are biased toward zero, with standard errors that are deflated. However, as no treatment difference is approached under the null hypothesis in superiority and under the alternative in NI, this results in decreased power and nominal or conservative (deflated) type I error in the context of superiority but inflated power and type I error under NI. Results from the simulation study suggest that, regardless of the use of the covariate in randomization, it is appropriate to adjust for important prognostic covariates in analysis, as this yields nearly unbiased estimates of treatment as well as nominal type I error.
authors: Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, U.S.A.
authors: Katherine
authors: K
authors: Nicholas
authors: Sharon D
authors: SD
authors: Yeatts
authors: Wenle
authors: W
authors: Zhao
authors: Jody
authors: J
authors: Ciolino
authors: Keith
authors: K
authors: Borg
authors: Valerie
authors: V
authors: Durkalski
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D011379:Prognosis; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design
keywords: clinical trials; covariates; noninferiority; randomization
references: Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4 Suppl):161S-175S
references: 2605965
references: Stat Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715-26
references: 7997705
references: Control Clin Trials. 1982 Dec;3(4):345-53
references: 7160191
references: Stat Med. 1989 Apr;8(4):467-75
references: 2727470
references: Stat Med. 1995 Apr 30;14(8):735-46
references: 7644855
references: Stat Med. 2010 Apr 30;29(9):982-93
references: 20191595
references: Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):601-8
references: 21921062
references: Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):328-40
references: 22139891
references: Pharm Stat. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):39-48
references: 21544929
references: J Biopharm Stat. 2013;23(6):1383-402
references: 24138438
references: Biometrics. 1977 Dec;33(4):593-602
references: 588654
references: Stat Med. 2003 Jan 30;22(2):169-86
references: 12520555
references: Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):741-62
references: 12587103