title: A model of the evolution of larval feeding rate in Drosophila driven by conflicting energy demands.
abstract: Energy allocation is believed to drive trade-offs in life history evolution. We develop a physiological and genetic model of energy allocation that drives evolution of feeding rate in a well-studied model system. In a variety of stressful environments Drosophila larvae adapt by altering their rate of feeding. Drosophila larvae adapted to high levels of ammonia, urea, and the presence of parasitoids evolve lower feeding rates. Larvae adapted to crowded conditions evolve higher feeding rates. Feeding rates should affect gross food intake, metabolic rates, and efficiency of food utilization. We develop a model of larval net energy intake as a function of feeding rates. We show that when there are toxic compounds in the larval food that require energy for detoxification, larvae can maximize their energy intake by slowing their feeding rates. While the reduction in feeding rates may increase development time and decrease competitive ability, we show that genotypes with lower feeding rates can be favored by natural selection if they have a sufficiently elevated viability in the toxic environment. This work shows how a simple phenotype, larval feeding rates, may be of central importance in adaptation to a wide variety of stressful environments via its role in energy allocation.
authors: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA, ldmuelle@uci.edu.
authors: Laurence D
authors: LD
authors: Mueller
authors: Thomas T
authors: TT
authors: Barter
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004330:Drosophila / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism*; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D005787:Gene Frequency; D005838:Genotype; D007814:Larva; D008954:Models, Biological; D011110:Polymorphism, Genetic; D012641:Selection, Genetic
references: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2007 Jul-Aug;80(4):358-69
references: 17508332
references: Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1302-1305
references: 28565507
references: J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):433-47
references: 17305809
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30650
references: 22292007
references: Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):163-172
references: 28568802
references: Science. 1983 Jul 8;221(4606):165-7
references: 17769215
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4383-6
references: 3132712
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1;88(5):1835-9
references: 1900368
references: Evolution. 2001 Dec;55(12):2493-502
references: 11831665
references: Evolution. 2009 Sep;63(9):2389-401
references: 19473389
references: Science. 1965 Aug 13;149(3685):758-61
references: 14325166
references: Evolution. 1966 Jun;20(2):174-184
references: 28563630
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Dec 7;270(1532):2465-9
references: 14667336
references: Am Nat. 1998 Feb;151(2):148-56
references: 18811414
references: Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):1090-1093
references: 28581181
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 19;105(7):2498-503
references: 18268352
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 8;94(14):7373-7
references: 9207098
references: Evolution. 1997 Apr;51(2):420-432
references: 28565346