title: Fungal secondary metabolite dynamics in fungus-grazer interactions: novel insights and unanswered questions.
abstract: In response to fungivore grazing fungi are assumed to have evolved secondary metabolite-based defense mechanisms that harm and repel grazers, and hence provide a benefit to the metabolite producer. However, since research into the ecological meaning of highly diverse fungal secondary metabolites is still in its infancy, many central questions still remain. Which components of the enormous metabolite diversity of fungi act as direct chemical defense mechanisms against grazers? Is the proposed chemical defense of fungi induced by grazer attack? Which role do volatile compounds play in communicating noxiousness to grazers? What is the relative impact of grazers and that of interactions with competing microbes on the evolution of fungal secondary metabolism? Here, I briefly summarize and discuss the results of the very few studies that have tried to tackle some of these questions by (i) using secondary metabolite mutant fungi in controlled experiments with grazers, and by (ii) investigating fungal secondary metabolism as a flexible means to adapt to grazer-rich niches.
authors: Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-University Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
authors: Marko
authors: M
authors: Rohlfs
keywords: Aspergillus; chemical defense regulation; fungivory; inducible resistance; secondary metabolites
references: Mycotoxin Res. 2014 Aug;30(3):151-9
references: 24619360
references: Chemistry. 2008;14(30):9100-10
references: 18601235
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 2011 Jan;48(1):35-48
references: 20519149
references: PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002706
references: 22615566
references: FEBS J. 2014 Aug;281(15):3489-506
references: 24930858
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 2010 Dec;47(12):962-72
references: 20816830
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jul;39(2):128-35
references: 12781671
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Jan;11(1):21-32
references: 23178386
references: Mycotoxin Res. 2009 Jun;25(2):103-12
references: 23604986
references: Oecologia. 2004 May;139(3):347-53
references: 15021980
references: J Chem Ecol. 1983 Oct;9(10):1439-47
references: 24408731
references: Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Apr;3(2):527-35
references: 15075281
references: Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1504-6
references: 18556559
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 2014 Mar;64:25-35
references: 24412484
references: Mycotoxin Res. 2010 Nov;26(4):241-6
references: 23605486
references: Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Oct;31(10):767-90
references: 8225136
references: Trends Microbiol. 2007 Mar;15(3):109-18
references: 17276068
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 25;280(1771):20131219
references: 24068353
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011 Aug;321(2):157-66
references: 21658102
references: Mol Ecol. 2011 Jul;20(14):3056-70
references: 21486374
references: PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e74951
references: 24023705
references: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008 Jul;284(2):142-9
references: 18510557
references: Biol Lett. 2007 Oct 22;3(5):523-5
references: 17686752
references: PLoS One. 2013 Aug 26;8(8):e73369
references: 23991191
references: Mol Microbiol. 2012 Mar;83(5):1024-34
references: 22283524
references: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1990;44:395-427
references: 2252388
references: Fungal Genet Biol. 2011 Jan;48(1):15-22
references: 20433937
references: J Invertebr Pathol. 1983 May;41(3):321-7
references: 6408193
references: Mycopathologia. 2007 Apr;163(4):207-14
references: 17404894
references: PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 02;6(12):e1001226
references: 21152013