title: [Optic neuropathy after retrobulbar neuritis in multiple sclerosis: are optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging useful and necessary follow-up parameters?].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study evaluated whether progressive optic neuropathy (ON) is commonly found after retrobulbar neuritis and whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a useful tool for follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
  
  
  METHODS
  An observational study of 86 MS patients (currently treated with immunomodulation) with a past medical history of ON was carried out. Patients were assessed in 2010 and 2012 using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), visual acuity, visual evoked potentials (VEP) and OCT but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed only in 2012.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this study 16 men and 70 women with a mean age of 41.6 and 43.8 years, respectively, were evaluated (28 patients post bilateral and 58 patients post unilateral ON including 114 eyes post-ON and 58 eyes without previous ON). Visual acuity and VEPs improved or remained the same over the study period. Visual acuity, VEPs, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and macular volume were significantly worse in eyes post-ON compared to eyes without previous ON. The RNFL significantly decreased over the study period in eyes post-ON from an average of 79.9 ± 13.3 μm to 77.0 ± 12.9 μm (p < 0.0001) and eyes without previous ON from 89.5 ± 12.9 μm to 86.0 ± 12.5 μm (p < 0.0001). The number of VEPs and RNFL thickness were significantly correlated with visual acuity in all eyes. In patients after unilateral ON the brain atrophy parameters corpus callosum index (CCI) and cella media index (CMI) were negatively correlated with the EDSS.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Initially MS often begins with an episode of ON which can be stabilized by immunomodulation. A mild progressive ON was generally detectable in this study but severe progressive ON was rarely observed. The OCT measurements showed no better correlation than the VEPs with visual acuity; however, OCT can be applied for confirmation of atypical ON. The corpus callosum index seems to be best associated with the degree of disability while, as already described in the literature, the number of T2 lesions is not well correlated with disability, probably due to the small-world network function of the brain and the position of the lesions in areas with no clinical relevance.
authors: East Surrey Hospital, Canada Avenue, Redhill, RH1 5RH, Redhill, UK, martindachsel@gmx.de.
authors: R M
authors: RM
authors: Dachsel
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Dachsel
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Domke
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Groß
authors: O
authors: O
authors: Schubert
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Kotrini
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Ladegast
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Vogel
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Jordan
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Zawade
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D009103:Multiple Sclerosis / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D009901:Optic Nerve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D009902:Optic Neuritis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence / Q000379:methods*
references: Neurology. 2009 Jul 7;73(1):46-52
references: 19564583
references: Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2007 Jul 05;1(1):3
references: 17908336
references: Mult Scler Int. 2011;2011:472790
references: 22096638
references: J Neurol. 2010 Oct;257(10):1654-60
references: 20461397
references: Retina. 1994;14(5):445-51
references: 7899721
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Feb;30(2):403-16
references: 18072237
references: Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1282-8
references: 9595975
references: Neurology. 2007 Oct 16;69(16):1603-9
references: 17938370
references: Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):324-32
references: 16406539
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19843
references: 21611198
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):63-72
references: 16399673
references: Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008 Dec;4(12):664-75
references: 19043423
references: J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1983 Sep;3(3):211-20
references: 6226722
references: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Nov;159(5):1041-7
references: 1414773
references: Mult Scler. 2012 Feb;18(2):164-73
references: 21908484
references: Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun;95(6):804-10
references: 21097787
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33907
references: 22448279
references: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2012 Aug;11(5):518-27
references: 22583437
references: Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1256-1264.e1
references: 20381872
references: J Neurol. 2010 Jul;257(7):1083-91
references: 20143110
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2001 Nov 5;87(19):198701
references: 11690461
references: Neurology. 1999 Jul 13;53(1):139-48
references: 10408550
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 2;3(2):e17
references: 17274684
references: Brain. 1996 Dec;119 ( Pt 6):2009-19
references: 9010005
references: Mult Scler. 2010 Apr;16(4):412-26
references: 20207786
references: Ann Neurol. 2006 Jun;59(6):963-9
references: 16718705
references: Neurology. 2012 Oct 30;79(18):1866-72
references: 23077012
references: Ann Neurol. 2010 Jun;67(6):749-60
references: 20517936