title: Timescales alter the inferred strength and temporal consistency of intraspecific diet specialization.
abstract: Many populations consist of individuals that differ substantially in their diets. Quantification of the magnitude and temporal consistency of such intraspecific diet variation is needed to understand its importance, but the extent to which different approaches for doing so reflect instantaneous vs. time-aggregated measures of individual diets may bias inferences. We used direct observations of sea otter individuals (Enhydra lutris nereis) to assess how: (1) the timescale of sampling, (2) under-sampling, and (3) the incidence- vs. frequency-based consideration of prey species affect the inferred strength and consistency of intraspecific diet variation. Analyses of feeding observations aggregated over hourly to annual intervals revealed a substantial bias associated with time aggregation that decreases the inferred magnitude of specialization and increases the inferred consistency of individuals' diets. Time aggregation also made estimates of specialization more sensitive to the consideration of prey frequency, which decreased estimates relative to the use of prey incidence; time aggregation did not affect the extent to which under-sampling contributed to its overestimation. Our analyses demonstrate the importance of studying intraspecific diet variation with an explicit consideration of time and thereby suggest guidelines for future empirical efforts. Failure to consider time will likely produce inconsistent predictions regarding the effects of intraspecific variation on predator-prey interactions.
authors: Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA, mark.novak@science.oregonstate.edu.
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Novak
authors: M Tim
authors: MT
authors: Tinker
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004032:Diet; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D010041:Otters; D010641:Phenotype; D011235:Predatory Behavior
references: Ecol Lett. 2012 May;15(5):475-83
references: 22414160
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20782
references: 21687670
references: Oecologia. 1981 Sep;50(3):296-302
references: 28309044
references: Nature. 2009 Apr 30;458(7242):1167-70
references: 19339968
references: Ecology. 2011 Aug;92(8):1582-93
references: 21905425
references: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jun;11(6):609-23
references: 18400018
references: J Anim Ecol. 2009 Jul;78(4):848-56
references: 19486381
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):183-92
references: 21367482
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 17;106(7):2242-7
references: 19164513
references: Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1744-52
references: 20945772
references: Oecologia. 2006 May;148(1):12-21
references: 16456686
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jan;73(1):257-61
references: 1061123
references: Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):1-28
references: 12650459
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):560-5
references: 18195370
references: Science. 1986 May 16;232(4752):863-5
references: 17755969
references: Anim Behav. 2009 Apr 1;77(4):771-783
references: 24707058
references: Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1981-93
references: 18705384
references: PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e235
references: 17803356
references: Nat Commun. 2013;4:2318
references: 23933614
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):839-44
references: 17251094
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10075-9
references: 17537912
references: Oecologia. 2005 Aug;144(4):520-7
references: 15711995
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22015
references: 21760944
references: Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):948-58
references: 21790933
references: Oecologia. 2007 Jul;152(4):643-54
references: 17356809
references: Oecologia. 2011 Oct;167(2):305-14
references: 21761171