title: Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.
abstract: The US egg industry is exploring alternative housing systems for laying hens. However, limited published research related to cage-free aviary systems and enriched colony cages exists related to production, egg quality, and hen nutrition. The laying hen's nutritional requirements and resulting productivity are well established with the conventional cage system, but diminutive research is available in regards to alternative housing systems. The restrictions exist with limited availability of alternative housing systems in research settings and the considerable expense for increased bird numbers in a replicate due to alternative housing system design. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of nutrient and energy intake on production and egg quality parameters from laying hens housed at a commercial facility. Lohmann LSL laying hens were housed in three systems: enriched colony cage, cage-free aviary, and conventional cage at a single commercial facility. Daily production records were collected along with dietary changes during 15 production periods (28-d each). Eggs were analyzed for shell strength, shell thickness, Haugh unit, vitelline membrane properties, and egg solids each period. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) coupled with a principal components analysis (PCA) approach was utilized to assess the impact of nutritional changes on production parameters and monitored egg quality factors. The traits of hen-day production and mortality had a response only in the PCA 2 direction. This finds that as house temperature and Met intake increases, there is an inflection point at which hen-day egg production is negatively effected. Dietary changes more directly influenced shell parameters, vitelline membrane parameters, and egg total solids as opposed to laying hen housing system. Therefore, further research needs to be conducted in controlled research settings on laying hen nutrient and energy intake in the alternative housing systems and resulting impact on egg quality measures.
authors: Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 dkarcher@msu.edu.
authors: D M
authors: DM
authors: Karcher
authors: Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit.
authors: D R
authors: DR
authors: Jones
authors: South Atlantic Area, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA 30605.
authors: Z
authors: Z
authors: Abdo
authors: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
authors: Y
authors: Y
authors: Zhao
authors: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
authors: T A
authors: TA
authors: Shepherd
authors: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011.
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Xin
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens / Q000502:physiology*; D004435:Eating; D004531:Eggs / Q000592:standards*; D002149:Energy Intake; D006799:Housing, Animal; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: cage-free aviary; conventional cage; egg quality; enriched colony cage; nutrition
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):251-62
references: 21177467
references: Poult Sci. 2006 Sep;85(9):1670-7
references: 16977856
references: Poult Sci. 2009 Apr;88(4):698-707
references: 19276411
references: Poult Sci. 2008 May;87(5):844-52
references: 18420974
references: Poult Sci. 2005 Oct;84(10):1511-9
references: 16335118
references: Poult Sci. 1999 Dec;78(12):1675-80
references: 10626640
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):278-94
references: 21177469
references: Poult Sci. 2014 May;93(5):1282-8
references: 24795324
references: Br Poult Sci. 2004 Dec;45(6):745-52
references: 15697013
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2153-61
references: 21933995
references: Poult Sci. 2006 Mar;85(3):550-5
references: 16553288
references: Poult Sci. 2002 Mar;81(3):340-8
references: 11902409
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Mar;90(3):543-54
references: 21325224
references: Poult Sci. 2010 Nov;89(11):2307-16
references: 20952692
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Oct;90(10):2383-96
references: 21934024
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):99-106
references: 21177449
references: Poult Sci. 2010 Apr;89(4):745-51
references: 20308407
references: Poult Sci. 2011 Feb;90(2):321-7
references: 21248328