title: From body motion to cheers: Speakers' body movements as predictors of applause.
abstract: Appearance cues and brief displays of behavior are related to people's personality, to their performance at work and to the outcomes of elections. Thus, people present themselves to others on different communication channels, while their interaction partners form first impressions on the basis of the displayed cues. In the current study we examined whether people are able to read information from politicians' body motion. For a rating experiment we translated short video clips of politicians giving a speech into animated stick-figures and had these animations rated on trustworthiness, dominance, competence and the Big Five personality dimensions. Afterwards we correlated the ratings with the applause and the hecklings that the speakers received throughout their entire speech. This revealed that speakers whose body movements were perceived as high on dominance, as high on extraversion and as low on agreeableness received more applause. Although the results obtained need support from additional studies they indicate that body motion is an informative cue in real life settings.
authors: Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
authors: Markus
authors: M
authors: Koppensteiner
authors: Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
authors: Pia
authors: P
authors: Stephan
authors: Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
authors: Johannes Paul Michael
authors: JP
authors: Jäschke
keywords: Big Five; Body motion; Dominance; Impression formation; Nonverbal communication; Politics
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Jan;62(1):88-97
references: 1538316
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1478-83
references: 22042727
references: Cognition. 2001 Dec;82(2):B51-61
references: 11716834
references: Psychol Sci. 2008 Feb;19(2):109-11
references: 18271856
references: Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):261-71
references: 22717166
references: Perception. 2005;34(10):1171-80
references: 16309112
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11087-92
references: 18685089
references: J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(6):1137-1143
references: 24223432
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;86(4):599-614
references: 15053708
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(10):2018-32
references: 22650610