title: N2 gas is an effective fertilizer for bioethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis.
abstract: A nascent cellulosic ethanol industry is struggling to become cost-competitive against corn ethanol and gasoline. Millions of dollars are spent on nitrogen supplements to make up for the low nitrogen content of the cellulosic feedstock. Here we show for the first time to our knowledge that the ethanol-producing bacterium, Zymomonas mobilis, can use N2 gas in lieu of traditional nitrogen supplements. Despite being an electron-intensive process, N2 fixation by Z. mobilis did not divert electrons away from ethanol production, as the ethanol yield was greater than 97% of the theoretical maximum. In a defined medium, Z. mobilis produced ethanol 50% faster per cell and generated half the unwanted biomass when supplied N2 instead of ammonium. In a cellulosic feedstock-derived medium, Z. mobilis achieved a similar cell density and a slightly higher ethanol yield when supplied N2 instead of the industrial nitrogen supplement, corn steep liquor. We estimate that N2-utilizing Z. mobilis could save a cellulosic ethanol production facility more than $1 million/y.
authors: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
authors: Timothy A
authors: TA
authors: Kremer
authors: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
authors: Breah
authors: B
authors: LaSarre
authors: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.
authors: Amanda L
authors: AL
authors: Posto
authors: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 jmckinla@indiana.edu.
authors: James B
authors: JB
authors: McKinlay
mesh_terms: D000431:Ethanol / Q000378:metabolism*; D005308:Fertilizers; D009584:Nitrogen; D009586:Nitrogen Fixation; D017355:Zymomonas / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D005308:Fertilizers; D000431:Ethanol; D009584:Nitrogen
keywords: Zymomonas mobilis; biofuel; cellulosic; ethanol; nitrogenase
references: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Aug;2(8):621-31
references: 15263897
references: J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;14(4):163-75
references: 18089934
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11669-75
references: 20558750
references: J Bacteriol. 2011 Sep;193(18):5049-50
references: 21742897
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1997 Spring;63-65:287-304
references: 18576088
references: BMC Genomics. 2009 Jan 20;10:34
references: 19154596
references: Science. 2014 Sep 5;345(6201):1111
references: 25190774
references: Biotechnol Prog. 2010 Jan-Feb;26(1):64-72
references: 19785041
references: J Bacteriol. 1949 Apr;57(4):413-4
references: 16561713
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):40-1
references: 15637618
references: J Cell Comp Physiol. 1957 Feb;49(1):25-68
references: 13416343
references: Adv Microb Physiol. 2006;51:73-117
references: 17010696
references: Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):143-5
references: 23110970
references: J Bacteriol. 2014 Mar;196(6):1231-7
references: 24415727
references: J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 10;281(45):34040-7
references: 16971389
references: Metab Eng. 2007 Mar;9(2):177-92
references: 17197218
references: Microb Cell Fact. 2010 Nov 24;9:94
references: 21092328
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1991 Jun;35(3):283-291
references: 22622926
references: Nature. 2014 Mar 13;507(7491):152-3
references: 24622185
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):6651-6
references: 16269693
references: J Biol Chem. 2014 Jan 24;289(4):1960-70
references: 24302724
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004 Spring;113-116:403-16
references: 15054267
references: Bioinformatics. 2012 May 1;28(9):1294-6
references: 22419781