title: The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate whether aneurysm shape and extent, which indicate whether a patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is eligible for endovascular repair (EVAR), influence the outcome of both EVAR and open surgical repair.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The influence of six morphological parameters (maximum aortic diameter, aneurysm neck diameter, length and conicality, proximal neck angle, and maximum common iliac diameter) on mortality and reinterventions within 30 days was investigated in rAAA patients randomized before morphological assessment in the Immediate Management of the Patient with Rupture: Open Versus Endovascular strategies (IMPROVE) trial. Patients with a proven diagnosis of rAAA, who underwent repair and had their admission computerized tomography scan submitted to the core laboratory, were included. Among 458 patients (364 men, mean age 76 years), who had either EVAR (n = 177) or open repair (n = 281) started, there were 155 deaths and 88 re-interventions within 30 days of randomization analysed according to a pre-specified plan. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 8.6 cm. There were no substantial correlations between the six morphological variables. Aneurysm neck length was shorter in those undergoing open repair (vs. EVAR). Aneurysm neck length (mean 23.3, SD 16.1 mm) was inversely associated with mortality for open repair and overall: adjusted OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57, 0.92) for each 16 mm (SD) increase in length. There were no convincing associations of morphological parameters with reinterventions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Short aneurysm necks adversely influence mortality after open repair of rAAA and preclude conventional EVAR. This may help explain why observational studies, but not randomized trials, have shown an early survival benefit for EVAR.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  ISRCTN 48334791.
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D001019:Aortic Rupture / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D057510:Endovascular Procedures / Q000401:mortality*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012086:Reoperation; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Aneurysm; Aorta; Imaging; Rupture; Stent grafts; Surgery
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;47(6):593-602
references: 24746873
references: J Vasc Surg. 1996 Jan;23(1):123-9
references: 8558727
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;32(5):506-13; discussion 514-5
references: 16887369
references: Ann Surg. 2008 Jan;247(1):173-9
references: 18156938
references: J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):214-221
references: 18178478
references: N Engl J Med. 2010 May 20;362(20):1863-71
references: 20382983
references: Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1207-17
references: 20602502
references: Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2848-55
references: 21478500
references: J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):1-12.e6; discussion 11-2
references: 21498023
references: Br J Surg. 2012 Jul;99(7):940-7
references: 22547400
references: J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;19(3):400-14
references: 22788895
references: J Vasc Surg. 2013 May;57(5):1261-8, 1268.e1-5
references: 23384493
references: Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):248-56
references: 23549424
references: Br J Surg. 2013 Sep;100(10):1302-11
references: 23797788
references: BMJ. 2014;348:f7661
references: 24418950
references: Br J Surg. 2014 Feb;101(3):216-24; discussion 224
references: 24469620
references: PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87465
references: 24498112
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;47(4):380-7
references: 24485844