title: Is ground cover vegetation an effective biological control enhancement strategy against olive pests?
abstract: Ground cover vegetation is often added or allowed to generate to promote conservation biological control, especially in perennial crops. Nevertheless, there is inconsistent evidence of its effectiveness, with studies reporting positive, nil or negative effects on pest control. This might arise from differences between studies at the local scale (e.g. orchard management and land use history), the landscape context (e.g. presence of patches of natural or semi-natural vegetation near the focal orchard), or regional factors, particularly climate in the year of the study. Here we present the findings from a long-term regional monitoring program conducted on four pest species (Bactrocera oleae, Prays oleae, Euphyllura olivina, Saissetia oleae) in 2,528 olive groves in Andalusia (Spain) from 2006 to 2012. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to analyze the effect of ground cover on different response variables related to pest abundance, while accounting for variability at the local, landscape and regional scales. There were small and inconsistent effects of ground cover on the abundance of pests whilst local, landscape and regional variability explained a large proportion of the variability in pest response variables. This highlights the importance of local and landscape-related variables in biological control and the potential effects that might emerge from their interaction with practices, such as groundcover vegetation, implemented to promote natural enemy activity. The study points to perennial vegetation close to the focal crop as a promising alternative strategy for conservation biological control that should receive more attention.
authors: Departamento de Protección Ambiental, Estación Experimental de Zaidín (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Granada, Andalucía, Spain.
authors: Daniel
authors: D
authors: Paredes
authors: Departamento de Biología y Geología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos I, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
authors: Luis
authors: L
authors: Cayuela
authors: Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Orange, New South Wales, Australia.
authors: Geoff M
authors: GM
authors: Gurr
authors: Departamento de Protección Ambiental, Estación Experimental de Zaidín (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Granada, Andalucía, Spain.
authors: Mercedes
authors: M
authors: Campos
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D003198:Computer Simulation; D017753:Ecosystem; D008954:Models, Biological; D031658:Olea / Q000469:parasitology*; D010572:Pest Control, Biological / Q000379:methods*; D013030:Spain; D033621:Tephritidae / Q000502:physiology
references: Science. 1999 Aug 6;285(5429):893-5
references: 10436158
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 22;273(1595):1715-27
references: 16790403
references: Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):407-10
references: 15164061
references: Exp Appl Acarol. 2011 Mar;53(3):215-34
references: 20838882
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Apr;52(3):263-76
references: 20175097
references: Bull Entomol Res. 2010 Aug;100(4):489-99
references: 20102658
references: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 May;45(3):272-7
references: 18452352
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:175-201
references: 10761575
references: Bull Entomol Res. 2011 Oct;101(5):557-64
references: 21457587
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1975;20:285-335
references: 234711
references: Pest Manag Sci. 2011 Sep;67(9):1107-14
references: 21480464
references: PeerJ. 2013 Jul 25;1:e116
references: 23904994
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 2;110(14):5534-9
references: 23513216