title: Cognitive aging on latent constructs for visual processing capacity: a novel structural equation modeling framework with causal assumptions based on a theory of visual attention.
abstract: We examined the effects of normal aging on visual cognition in a sample of 112 healthy adults aged 60-75. A testbattery was designed to capture high-level measures of visual working memory and low-level measures of visuospatial attention and memory. To answer questions of how cognitive aging affects specific aspects of visual processing capacity, we used confirmatory factor analyses in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM; Model 2), informed by functional structures that were modeled with path analyses in SEM (Model 1). The results show that aging effects were selective to measures of visual processing speed compared to visual short-term memory (VSTM) capacity (Model 2). These results are consistent with some studies reporting selective aging effects on processing speed, and inconsistent with other studies reporting aging effects on both processing speed and VSTM capacity. In the discussion we argue that this discrepancy may be mediated by differences in age ranges, and variables of demography. The study demonstrates that SEM is a sensitive method to detect cognitive aging effects even within a narrow age-range, and a useful approach to structure the relationships between measured variables, and the cognitive functional foundation they supposedly represent.
authors: Brain Rehabilitation Advanced Technology and Learning Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Nielsen
authors: Brain Rehabilitation Advanced Technology and Learning Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark.
authors: L Inge
authors: LI
authors: Wilms
keywords: SEM; TVA; a theory of visual attention; cognitive aging; structural equation modeling; visual attention; visual short-term memory
references: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1984 May;37 ( Pt 1):62-83
references: 6733054
references: Hippocampus. 2007;17(1):34-48
references: 17143905
references: Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):123-33
references: 16817521
references: Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):859-72
references: 19648173
references: Arch Sci Psychol. 2013 Feb;1(1):14-22
references: 23997997
references: Neurology. 2012 Apr 10;78(15):1123-9
references: 22491864
references: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005 Nov;11(7):832-42
references: 16519262
references: Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):403-28
references: 8759042
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Dec;132(4):566-94
references: 14640849
references: Scand J Psychol. 2013 Apr;54(2):89-94
references: 23121639
references: Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 21;5:1177
references: 25374549
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references: 7605061
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25-42
references: 2183676
references: Psychol Aging. 1998 Sep;13(3):405-23
references: 9793117
references: Neurobiol Aging. 2012 Jan;33(1):134-48
references: 20144492
references: Neurobiol Aging. 2008 Oct;29(10):1547-55
references: 17451845
references: Hippocampus. 2010 Oct;20(10):1154-69
references: 19852032
references: Psychol Aging. 1991 Dec;6(4):533-41
references: 1777141
references: Mem Cognit. 1999 Nov;27(6):1064-72
references: 10586581
references: Curr Biol. 2012 May 8;22(9):814-9
references: 22483940
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):340-7
references: 11970796
references: Psychol Aging. 1994 Mar;9(1):90-102
references: 8185873
references: Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82
references: 11928891
references: Neurobiol Aging. 2010 Sep;31(9):1656-60; discussion 1561-6
references: 20079555
references: J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
references: 1202204
references: Psychol Rev. 1990 Oct;97(4):523-47
references: 2247540
references: Sociol Methods Res. 2008 Jan 1;36(4):462-494
references: 19756246
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:201-26
references: 10751970
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Feb;5(2):87-96
references: 14735112
references: Biol Psychol. 2000 Oct;54(1-3):35-54
references: 11035219
references: Exp Aging Res. 2012;38(1):1-19
references: 22224947
references: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1298-300
references: 16158065
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Oct;63(2 Pt 2):727-32
references: 3808855
references: Nature. 2013 Sep 5;501(7465):97-101
references: 24005416
references: Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 07;5:1137
references: 25339932
references: Psychol Aging. 1994 Jun;9(2):216-23
references: 8054169
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Dec;128(4):450-78
references: 10650583
references: Psychol Bull. 1997 Nov;122(3):231-49
references: 9354147
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1570-82
references: 22825931
references: Behav Res Methods. 2014 Mar;46(1):81-94
references: 23592299
references: J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91
references: 13174710