title: Discussion: Factors impacting successfully competing for research funding: an analysis of applications submitted to the Plastic Surgery Foundation.
authors: Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan.
authors: David L
authors: DL
authors: Brown
authors: Paul S
authors: PS
authors: Cederna
mesh_terms: D005582:Foundations / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D013518:Surgery, Plastic / Q000191:economics*
references: Kaatz A, Magua W, Zimmerman DR, Carnes M. A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution. Acad Med. 2015;90:69–75
references: Martin MR, Kopstein A, Janice JM. An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13526
references: Larson KE, Gastman B. Sources of federal funding in plastic and reconstructive surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:1289–1294