title: Differential recall of derived and inflected word forms in working memory: examining the role of morphological information in simple and complex working memory tasks.
abstract: Working memory (WM) has been described as an interface between cognition and action, or a system for access to a limited amount of information needed in complex cognition. Access to morphological information is needed for comprehending and producing sentences. The present study probed WM for morphologically complex word forms in Finnish, a morphologically rich language. We studied monomorphemic (boy), inflected (boy+'s), and derived (boy+hood) words in three tasks. Simple span, immediate serial recall of words, in Experiment 1, is assumed to mainly rely on information in the focus of attention. Sentence span, a dual task combining sentence reading with recall of the last word (Experiment 2) or of a word not included in the sentence (Experiment 3) is assumed to involve establishment of a search set in long-term memory for fast activation into the focus of attention. Recall was best for monomorphemic and worst for inflected word forms with performance on derived words in between. However, there was an interaction between word type and experiment, suggesting that complex span is more sensitive to morphological complexity in derivations than simple span. This was explored in a within-subjects Experiment 4 combining all three tasks. An interaction between morphological complexity and task was replicated. Both inflected and derived forms increased load in WM. In simple span, recall of inflectional forms resulted in form errors. Complex span tasks were more sensitive to morphological load in derived words, possibly resulting from interference from morphological neighbors in the mental lexicon. The results are best understood as involving competition among inflectional forms when binding words from input into an output structure, and competition from morphological neighbors in secondary memory during cumulative retrieval-encoding cycles. Models of verbal recall need to be able to represent morphological as well as phonological and semantic information.
authors: Language, Memory and Brain Lab, Department of Linguistics and Languages, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, Canada ; Cognitive Science, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
authors: Elisabet
authors: E
authors: Service
authors: Cognitive Science, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
authors: Sini
authors: S
authors: Maury
keywords: Finnish; complex span; derived; inflected; morphological processing; morphology
references: Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2758-71
references: 24075689
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):2064-72
references: 19520173
references: Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):231-44
references: 21264630
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79
references: 12026954
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):411-21
references: 12018494
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423
references: 11058819
references: Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 25;2:282
references: 22046167
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29
references: 21961947
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2002 Mar;31(2):83-106
references: 12022795
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):779-819
references: 22715024
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jul 21;5:66
references: 21811451
references: Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):42-54
references: 12081380
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 May 29;362(1481):823-36
references: 17395577
references: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):104-32
references: 17227183
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):895-908
references: 19679868
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jan 09;6:353
references: 23316156
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):83-100
references: 14979753
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
references: 24324449
references: Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):251-69
references: 2192233
references: Brain Res. 2007 May 7;1148:123-37
references: 17382308
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Jun;42(3):239-53
references: 22485043
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1019-34
references: 12450329
references: Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):412-23
references: 12081409