title: Meta-analysis: how does posterior parietal cortex contribute to reasoning?
abstract: Reasoning depends on the contribution of posterior parietal cortex (PPC). But PPC is involved in many basic operations-including spatial attention, mathematical cognition, working memory, long-term memory, and language-and the nature of its contribution to reasoning is unclear. Psychological theories of the processes underlying reasoning make divergent claims about the neural systems that are likely to be involved, and better understanding the specific contribution of PPC can help to inform these theories. We set out to address several competing hypotheses, concerning the role of PPC in reasoning: (1) reasoning involves application of formal logic and is dependent on language, with PPC activation for reasoning mainly reflective of linguistic processing; (2) reasoning involves probabilistic computation and is thus dependent on numerical processing mechanisms in PPC; and (3) reasoning is built upon the representation and processing of spatial relations, and PPC activation associated with reasoning reflects spatial processing. We conducted two separate meta-analyses. First, we pooled data from our own studies of reasoning in adults, and examined activation in PPC regions of interest (ROI). Second, we conducted an automated meta-analysis using Neurosynth, in which we examined overlap between activation maps associated with reasoning and maps associated with other key functions of PPC. In both analyses, we observed reasoning-related activation concentrated in the left Inferior Parietal Lobe (IPL). Reasoning maps demonstrated the greatest overlap with mathematical cognition. Maintenance, visuospatial, and phonological processing also demonstrated some overlap with reasoning, but a large portion of the reasoning map did not overlap with the map for any other function. This evidence suggests that the PPC's contribution to reasoning may be most closely related to its role in mathematical cognition, but that a core component of this contribution may be specific to reasoning.
authors: Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, CA, USA.
authors: Carter
authors: C
authors: Wendelken
keywords: IPL; SPL; deductive reasoning; meta-analysis; numerical cognition; posterior parietal cortex; spatial cognition
references: J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14496-505
references: 19923283
references: Nat Methods. 2011 Jun 26;8(8):665-70
references: 21706013
references: Brain Lang. 1975 Oct;2(4):387-95
references: 1218375
references: Neuroimage. 2009 May 15;46(1):338-42
references: 19457362
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3483-97
references: 21568632
references: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;3(4):255-74
references: 15040547
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1679-93
references: 15275924
references: Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):665-78
references: 18022652
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Oct 1;5(10):434-442
references: 11707382
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Dec;21(6):803-31; discussion 831-64
references: 10191879
references: Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3547-60
references: 25205661
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:9-34
references: 24486722
references: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):487-506
references: 20957581
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 May 23;7:219
references: 23734122
references: Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):91-5
references: 16382240
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Mar;15(3):239-49
references: 15238433
references: Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2592-608
references: 21616086
references: Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):751-4
references: 15085133
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):837-47
references: 19320546
references: Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):430-48
references: 16949304
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Dec;25(6):657-74; discussion 674-725
references: 14598623
references: Behav Brain Res. 2009 Sep 14;202(2):153-61
references: 19463696
references: Neuron. 2010 Jul 15;67(1):156-70
references: 20624599
references: Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):733-43
references: 19524531
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jun;16(6):338-52
references: 22609315
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1831-40
references: 19487186
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:130-44
references: 11506653
references: J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 16;31(11):4087-100
references: 21411650
references: Psychol Bull. 2012 May;138(3):427-57
references: 22289108
references: Brain Cogn. 1999 Oct;41(1):27-38
references: 10536084
references: Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):1767-74
references: 18308348
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Oct;11(10):435-41
references: 17913567
references: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(12):1277-91
references: 11566311
references: Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1238-48
references: 15949508
references: Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):55-66
references: 19120413
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Nov;12(5):504-14
references: 11034858
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Dec;100(6):3328-42
references: 18799601
references: Neuroscientist. 2013 Feb;19(1):43-61
references: 22547530
references: Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005 Dec;210(5-6):463-72
references: 16249866
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):30-6
references: 17134935
references: Ann Neurol. 1981 Oct;10(4):309-25
references: 7032417
references: Am Psychol. 1997 Jan;52(1):32-4
references: 9017930
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1739-53
references: 19642889
references: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Aug;33(8):1952-63
references: 21834102
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):381-91
references: 22759996
references: Brain Lang. 2010 May;113(2):59-64
references: 20206985
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Apr;31(2):109-30; discussion 130-178
references: 18479531
references: Neuroscientist. 2013 Dec;19(6):578-91
references: 23778789
references: Neuroimage. 2009 Mar;45(1 Suppl):S210-21
references: 19063980
references: Mem Cognit. 1992 Jul;20(4):413-23
references: 1495403
references: Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5
references: 8455719
references: Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96
references: 19329570
references: Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):970-4
references: 10320379
references: J Anat. 2005 Jul;207(1):3-17
references: 16011542
references: Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1136-49
references: 11697945
references: Science. 2006 Sep 8;313(5792):1431-5
references: 16960005
references: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2831-8
references: 21982934
references: Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):448-63
references: 24222318
references: Neuropsychologia. 2013 Feb;51(3):464-71
references: 23206538
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;17(7):328-36
references: 23790322
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):445-53
references: 16054861
references: Neuroimage. 2001 Jul;14(1 Pt 2):S2-7
references: 11373126
references: Brain Cogn. 2009 Feb;69(1):1-10
references: 18835075
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009 Feb;91(2):139-54
references: 19028591
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Feb;32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120
references: 19210833
references: J Neurophysiol. 2012 Nov;108(9):2419-29
references: 22896722