title: Substantial Goodness and Nascent Human Life.
abstract: Many believe that moral value is--at least to some extent--dependent on the developmental states necessary for supporting rational activity. My paper rejects this view, but does not aim simply to register objections to it. Rather, my essay aims to answer the following question: if a human being's developmental state and occurrent capacities do not bequeath moral standing, what does? The question is intended to prompt careful consideration of what makes human beings objects of moral value, dignity, or (to employ my preferred term) goodness. Not only do I think we can answer this question, I think we can show that nascent human life possesses goodness of precisely this sort. I appeal to Aquinas's metaethics to establish the conclusion that the goodness of a human being--even if that being is an embryo or fetus--resides at the substratum of her existence. If she possesses goodness, it is because human existence is good.
authors: Brehme Centennial Center 102-D, Malone University, Canton, OH, 44709, USA, sfloyd@malone.edu.
authors: Shawn
authors: S
authors: Floyd
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000941:ethics*; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000941:ethics*; D005260:Female; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D028723:Personhood; D011247:Pregnancy; D026712:Value of Life
references: J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):56-60
references: 15634754
references: Bioethics. 2000 Apr;14(2):134-57
references: 11765762
references: Philosophy. 2003 Oct;78(4):532-40
references: 16211782
references: Theol Stud. 1990 Dec;51(4):603-26
references: 11656166
references: J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):261-3
references: 22361296
references: J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):48-55
references: 15634753
references: J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):341-4
references: 23637449