title: Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the "Canine Cooperation Hypothesis".
abstract: At present, beyond the fact that dogs can be easier socialized with humans than wolves, we know little about the motivational and cognitive effects of domestication. Despite this, it has been suggested that during domestication dogs have become socially more tolerant and attentive than wolves. These two characteristics are crucial for cooperation, and it has been argued that these changes allowed dogs to successfully live and work with humans. However, these domestication hypotheses have been put forward mainly based on dog-wolf differences reported in regard to their interactions with humans. Thus, it is possible that these differences reflect only an improved capability of dogs to accept humans as social partners instead of an increase of their general tolerance, attentiveness and cooperativeness. At the Wolf Science Center, in order to detangle these two explanations, we raise and keep dogs and wolves similarly socializing them with conspecifics and humans and then test them in interactions not just with humans but also conspecifics. When investigating attentiveness toward human and conspecific partners using different paradigms, we found that the wolves were at least as attentive as the dogs to their social partners and their actions. Based on these findings and the social ecology of wolves, we propose the Canine Cooperation Hypothesis suggesting that wolves are characterized with high social attentiveness and tolerance and are highly cooperative. This is in contrast with the implications of most domestication hypotheses about wolves. We argue, however, that these characteristics of wolves likely provided a good basis for the evolution of dog-human cooperation.
authors: Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Wolf Science Centre Ernstbrunn, Austria.
authors: Friederike
authors: F
authors: Range
authors: Comparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Wolf Science Centre Ernstbrunn, Austria.
authors: Zsófia
authors: Z
authors: Virányi
keywords: Canis familiaris; Canis lupus; attention; cooperation; domestication; evolution; tolerance
references: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16888
references: 21373192
references: Dev Sci. 2012 Mar;15(2):222-32
references: 22356178
references: Behav Processes. 2004 May 31;66(2):161-72
references: 15110918
references: Behav Processes. 1993 Feb;28(3):173-9
references: 24897602
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 22;278(1703):211-7
references: 20667875
references: PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86559
references: 24489744
references: Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 03;4:868
references: 24363648
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2299-309
references: 19620102
references: J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):380-6
references: 18085921
references: Anim Cogn. 2011 Jul;14(4):545-53
references: 21384141
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):287-94
references: 23643552
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):978-87
references: 21357220
references: Learn Behav. 2011 Dec;39(4):289-302
references: 21643852
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):340-5
references: 19064923
references: Am Nat. 1997 Oct;150(4):513-7
references: 18811290
references: J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):142-8
references: 12856784
references: Anim Cogn. 2005 Oct;8(4):215-9
references: 15719240
references: PLoS One. 2009 Aug 28;4(8):e6584
references: 19714197
references: Anim Cogn. 2013 May;16(3):435-43
references: 23224364
references: Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):769-777
references: 10512650
references: Curr Biol. 2007 May 15;17(10):868-72
references: 17462893
references: Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):57-71
references: 21739136
references: Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300
references: 16513985
references: Curr Biol. 2003 Apr 29;13(9):763-6
references: 12725735
references: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Aug;120(3):169-75
references: 16893253
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735
references: 16262930
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Dec;26(12):2849-64
references: 19723671
references: Curr Biol. 2010 Mar 9;20(5):R230-1
references: 20219170
references: Neuron. 2010 Mar 25;65(6):795-814
references: 20346756
references: J Comp Psychol. 1996 Dec;110(4):336-45
references: 8956505
references: Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):445-59
references: 23995845
references: Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):175-85
references: 21874515
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):545-53
references: 20020166
references: Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23
references: 17346970
references: Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):273-85
references: 23090682
references: Anim Cogn. 2006 Jan;9(1):13-26
references: 15895261
references: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):3-15
references: 11170692
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 22;108(12):5116-21
references: 21383191
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):373-87
references: 18183437
references: Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):181-92
references: 18716802
references: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):355-67
references: 17024511
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47653
references: 23071828
references: Behav Processes. 2009 Jul;81(3):409-15
references: 19520241
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1421-9
references: 18364318
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Oct;9(10):463-4; author reply 464-5
references: 16153882
references: Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1634-6
references: 12446914
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):439-44
references: 16061417
references: Behav Processes. 2009 Feb;80(2):109-14
references: 18977419
references: Behav Processes. 2013 Jan;92:131-42
references: 23124015
references: J Comp Psychol. 2003 Jun;117(2):156-65
references: 12856786