title: Muscle activation of paraspinal muscles in different types of high heels during standing.
abstract: [Purpose] This study researched the effects of different types of high heels on the muscles surrounding the cervical spine, the thoracic spine, and the lumbar spine by analyzing muscle activation of the paraspinal muscles during standing while wearing high heels. The high heels were all of the same height: 8 cm. [Subjects and Methods] The 28 subjects in this experiment were females in their 20s with a foot size of 225-230 mm and a normal gait pattern. To measure the muscle activation of the paraspinal muscles, EMG electrodes were attached on the paraspinal muscles around C6, T7, and L5. The muscle activation during standing while wearing 8-cm-high wedge heels, setback heels, and French heels was then measured. The measurements were performed 3 times each, and the mean value was used for analysis. [Results] The levels of muscle activation of the paraspinal muscles induced by standing on wedge heels, setback heels, and French heels in the cervical and lumbar areas were significantly higher than those induced by standing on bare feet. But there was no significant difference according to the heel types. [Conclusion] The height of the heels presented a greater variable than the width of the heels on the muscle activation of paraspinal muscles. Therefore, wearing high heels is not recommended for those who have pain or functional problems in the cervical and/or lumbar spine.
authors: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical and Life Science, Silla University, Republic of Korea.
authors: Dongwook
authors: D
authors: Han
keywords: Heel type; Muscle activation; Paraspinal muscle
references: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;70(5):246-54
references: 1910649
references: Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2011;13(1):27-33
references: 21500761
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 May;13(5):542-7
references: 3187700
references: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23 Suppl 1:S31-8
references: 17964015
references: Phys Ther. 1994 Jan;74(1):17-28; discussion 28-31
references: 8265724
references: Am J Sports Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-6
references: 2929825
references: J Orthop Sci. 2009 Jul;14(4):418-22
references: 19662476