title: Fermentation characteristics and lactic Acid bacteria succession of total mixed ration silages formulated with peach pomace.
abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the use of peach pomace in total mixed ration (TMR) silages and clarify the differences in aerobic stability between TMR and TMR silages caused by lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The TMR were prepared using peach pomace, alfalfa hay or Leymus chinensis hay, maize meal, soybean meal, cotton meal, limestone, a vitamin-mineral supplement, and salt in a ratio of 6.0:34.0:44.4:7.0:5.0:2.5:1.0:0.1 on a dry matter (DM) basis. Fermentation quality, microbial composition, and the predominant LAB were examined during ensiling and aerobic deterioration. The results indicated that the TMR silages with peach pomace were well fermented, with low pH and high lactic acid concentrations. The aerobic stability of TMR silages were significantly higher than that of TMR. Compared with TMR silages with alfalfa hay, TMR silage with Leymus chinensis hay was much more prone to deterioration. Although the dominant LAB were not identical in TMR, the same dominant species, Lactobacillus buchneri and Pediococcus acidilactici, were found in both types of TMR silages after 56 d of ensiling, and they may play an important role in the aerobic stability of TMR silages.
authors: Xiaodong
authors: X
authors: Hu
authors: Wei
authors: W
authors: Hao
authors: Huili
authors: H
authors: Wang
authors: Tingting
authors: T
authors: Ning
authors: Mingli
authors: M
authors: Zheng
authors: Chuncheng
authors: C
authors: Xu
keywords: Aerobic Stabilization; Lactic Acid Bacteria; Peach Pomace; Total Mixed Ration Silage
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Oct;53(10):2534-8
references: 16347470
references: J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3136-45
references: 20630231
references: J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Aug 15;93(10):2445-53
references: 23423982
references: J Anim Sci. 2007 Apr;85(4):1024-9
references: 17145973
references: Anim Sci J. 2010 Apr;81(2):194-8
references: 20438500
references: Bioresour Technol. 2008 May;99(8):2742-8
references: 17702573
references: J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
references: 1660498
references: Bioresour Technol. 2011 Jan;102(2):427-36
references: 20732807
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):732-42
references: 22313683
references: J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jun;114(6):1687-95
references: 23565809
references: J Dairy Sci. 2004 Aug;87(8):2563-70
references: 15328280