title: Real-world evaluation of the effects of counseling and education in diabetes management.
abstract: Background. Patient education has long been recognized as a component of effective diabetes management, but the impact of counseling and education (C/E) interventions on health care costs is not fully understood. Objectives. To identify the incidence and type of diabetes C/E received by type 2 diabetes patients and to evaluate associated economic and clinical outcomes. Methods. This retrospective cohort study used the Premier-Optum Continuum of Care database (2005-2009) to compare adult patients with type 2 diabetes receiving C/E to those not receiving C/E (control). The index date was the first C/E date or, in the control cohort, a randomly assigned date on which some care was delivered. Patients had at least 6 months' pre-index and 12 months' post-index continuous health plan coverage. Health care costs and glycemic levels were evaluated over 12 and 6 months, respectively, with adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Results. Of 26,790 patients identified, 9.3% received at least one C/E intervention (mean age 53 years, 47% men) and 90.7% received no C/E (mean age 57 years, 54% men). Standard diabetes education was the most common form of C/E (73%). After PSM, C/E patients had some improvements in glycemic levels (among those with laboratory values available), without increased risk for hypoglycemia, and incurred $2,335 per-patient less in diabetes-related health care costs, although their total health care costs increased. Conclusions. Despite the low uptake of C/E services, C/E interventions may be associated with economic and clinical benefits at 12 months. Further analyses are needed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of such initiatives.
authors: Mehul R
authors: MR
authors: Dalal
authors: Scott B
authors: SB
authors: Robinson
authors: Sean D
authors: SD
authors: Sullivan
references: Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(9):1-116, iii
references: 18405469
references: Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(22):iii, 1-190
references: 13678547
references: Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):655-60
references: 18184894
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):1007-30
references: 3193136
references: Diabetes Educ. 1999 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl):74-88
references: 10711087
references: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9
references: 18304674
references: Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615
references: 18308683
references: Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80
references: 24357209
references: Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):752-60
references: 19783766
references: Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S51-5
references: 19536019
references: BMC Endocr Disord. 2008 Apr 01;8:4
references: 18380903
references: Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):403-8
references: 10097918
references: Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1:S99-100
references: 22187478
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 Mar;93(3):309-14
references: 8267691
references: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Mar 27;6:18
references: 19327141
references: Diabetes Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;36(4):595-602
references: 20530663
references: Patient Educ Couns. 1990 Dec;16(3):189-215
references: 2149753
references: Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2465-70
references: 17586741
references: Stroke. 1996 Sep;27(9):1459-66
references: 8784113
references: Health Policy. 2010 Dec;98(2-3):131-43
references: 20598768
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Dec;104(12):1805-15
references: 15565074
references: Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):523-31
references: 23640302
references: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Mar;79(3):377-88
references: 17643546
references: Nurs Res. 1988 Jul-Aug;37(4):223-30
references: 3293025
references: BMJ. 2010 Aug 20;341:c4093
references: 20729270
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;(1):CD005268
references: 19160249
references: Prev Chronic Dis. 2011 May;8(3):A53
references: 21477493
references: Diabetes Educ. 2011 Sep-Oct;37(5):638-57
references: 21878591