title: Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objectives of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of the two common bone marrow stimulation techniques such as subchondral drilling and microfracture for symptomatic osteochondral lesions of the talus and to evaluate prognostic factors affecting the outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ninety patients (90 ankles) who underwent arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for small- to mid-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus constituted the study cohort. The 90 ankles were divided into two groups: a drilling group (40 ankles) and a microfracture group (50 ankles). Each group was matched for age and gender, and both groups had characteristics similar to those obtained from pre-operative demographic data. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and the ankle activity score (AAS) were used to compare clinical outcomes, during a mean follow-up period of 43 months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The median AOFAS scores were 66.0 points (51-80) in drilling group and 66.5 points (45-81) in microfracture group pre-operatively, and these improved to 89.4 points (77-100) and 90.1 points (69-100) at the final follow-up, respectively. The median VAS scores improved at the final follow-up compared with the pre-operative condition. The median AAS for the drilling group improved from 4.5 (1-6) pre-operatively to 6.0 (1-8) at the final follow-up, while those for the microfracture group improved from 3.0 (2-8) to 6.0 (3-9). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the AOFAS scores, VAS, and AAS.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The arthroscopic subchondral drilling and microfracture techniques that were used to stimulate bone marrow showed similar clinical outcomes. The results of this study suggest that both techniques are effective and reliable in treating small- to mid-sized osteochondral lesions of the talus, regardless of which of the two techniques is used.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level III, retrospective comparative study.
authors: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea.
authors: Jun-Ik
authors: JI
authors: Choi
authors: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, 42 Jebongro, Donggu, Gwangju, 501-757, Republic of Korea. kbleeos@chonnam.ac.kr.
authors: Keun-Bae
authors: KB
authors: Lee
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016512:Ankle Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D054544:Arthroplasty, Subchondral / Q000379:methods*; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000293:injuries / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013628:Talus / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Arthroscopy; Microfracture; Osteochondral lesion; Subchondral drilling; Talus
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959 Sep;41-A:988-1020
references: 13849029
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Apr;13(3):213-21
references: 15146311
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Sep;(198):43-9
references: 4028566
references: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2424-34
references: 25106781
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1265-71
references: 24841940
references: Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:487-504
references: 9571450
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Sep;85(7):989-93
references: 14516033
references: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;51(6):777-82
references: 22999970
references: Foot Ankle. 1989 Dec;10 (3):161-3
references: 2613129
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Sep;81(9):1229-35
references: 10505519
references: Foot Ankle Int. 2000 Feb;21(2):119-26
references: 10694023
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Feb;17 (2):184-7
references: 18810392
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Sep;71(8):1143-52
references: 2777840
references: Arthroscopy. 2003 Apr;19(4):360-7
references: 12671618
references: Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):419-24
references: 21984689
references: Foot Ankle Int. 2002 Aug;23 (8):693-8
references: 12199381
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Apr;84(3):364-8
references: 12002494
references: Arthroscopy. 2008 Jan;24(1):106-12
references: 18182210
references: J Orthop Res. 2009 Nov;27(11):1432-8
references: 19402150
references: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Feb;18(2):247-53
references: 19779893
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):303-8
references: 16452741
references: Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Aug;26(8):583-9
references: 16115412
references: Am J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):1750-62
references: 18753679
references: Arthroscopy. 2000 Apr;16(3):299-304
references: 10750010
references: Foot Ankle Clin. 2003 Jun;8(2):233-42, viii-ix
references: 12911238
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;(391 Suppl):S337-48
references: 11603717
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jul;68(6):862-5
references: 3733774
references: Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Mar;25(3):168-75
references: 15006340
references: Foot Ankle Int. 1994 Jul;15(7):349-53
references: 7951968
references: Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1085-92
references: 17027406
references: Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37 Suppl 1:63S-70S
references: 19843658
references: Arthroscopy. 1997 Feb;13(1):90-6
references: 9043610
references: Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Dec;27(12 ):1109-14
references: 17207440
references: Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;32(4):899-908
references: 15150035
references: Orthopade. 2008 Mar;37(3):232-9
references: 18317730
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Aug;(365):149-62
references: 10627699