title: Education and Cohabitation in Britain: A Return to Traditional Patterns?
abstract: Cohabitation is sometimes thought of as being inversely associated with education, but in Britain a more complex picture emerges. Educational group differences in cohabitation vary by age, time period, cohort, and indicator used. Well-educated women pioneered cohabitation in Britain in the 1970s and 1980s. In the most recent cohorts, however, the less educated have exceeded the best educated in the proportions ever having cohabited at young ages. But the main difference by education currently seems largely a matter of timing-that is, the less educated start cohabiting earlier than the best educated. In Britain, educational differentials in cohabitation appear to be reinstating longstanding social patterns in the level and timing of marriage. Taking partnerships as a whole, social differentials have been fairly stable. Following a period of innovation and diffusion, there is much continuity with the past.
authors: Professor of Demography, Division of Social Statistics and Demography University of Southampton, UK.
authors: Máire
authors: M
authors: Ní Bhrolcháin
authors: Research Scientist, Vienna Institute of Demography Austria.
authors: Éva
authors: É
authors: Beaujouan
references: Popul Trends. 2011 Autumn;(145):31-55
references: 21987012
references: Popul Stud (Camb). 2005 Jul;59(2):211-31
references: 16096199
references: J Marriage Fam. 2004 Dec 1;66(5):1214-1230
references: 24563549
references: Popul Stud (Camb). 2012 Nov;66(3):311-27
references: 22889178
references: Demogr Res. 2008;19:1663-1692
references: 19119426
references: Demography. 1987 Nov;24(4):623-37
references: 3428457
references: Eur J Popul. 1991 Sep;7(3):273-98
references: 12158962
references: Demography. 1991 Nov;28(4):587-607
references: 1769404
references: Popul Stud (Camb). 2000 Jan;54(1):29-41
references: 28489526
references: Popul Dev Rev. 2012;38(1):55-81
references: 22833864
references: Demography. 2004 Aug;41(3):547-68
references: 15461014
references: Demography. 2006 May;43(2):203-21
references: 16889125
references: J Aust Popul Assoc. 1995 May;12(1):51-86
references: 12294864
references: J Marriage Fam. 2010 Jun;72(3):403-419
references: 22399825
references: Demography. 1989 Nov;26(4):615-25
references: 2583320
references: Eur J Popul. 2011 Aug;27(3):269-293
references: 21957323
references: Eur J Popul. 2010 Feb;26(1):33-46
references: 20174441
references: Vital Health Stat 23. 2005 Dec;(25):1-160
references: 16532609
references: Popul Trends. 2011 Autumn;(145):115-41
references: 21987017
references: Popul. 1991;3:81-111
references: 12157919
references: Eur J Popul. 1994;10(2):143-73
references: 12288064
references: Eur Sociol Rev. 1996 May;12(1):53-65
references: 12320554
references: Demography. 1995 Aug;32(3):437-57
references: 8829976
references: Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963 Dec 10;159:178-202
references: 14087989
references: Demography. 2008 Feb;45(1):129-41
references: 18390295
references: Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):59-66
references: 11227845
references: Demography. 2003 May;40(2):351-67
references: 12846136
references: Demography. 2000 May;37(2):237-45
references: 10836181
references: Demography. 2003 Feb;40(1):127-49
references: 12647517