title: Exercise-induced responses in salivary testosterone, cortisol, and their ratios in men: a meta-analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Testosterone, cortisol and their ratios may be indicators of anabolic status, but technical issues surrounding blood sampling has limited wider application. The advent of salivary testosterone (sal-T) analysis simplified sample acquisition, resulting in a subsequent rapid increase in the number of published research articles.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to undertake a meta-analysis to determine the effect of acute exercise bouts on post exercise sal-T and salivary cortisol (sal-C) concentrations and their ratio (sal-T:C).
  
  
  METHODS
  Relevant databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct and SPORTDiscus were searched up to and including 31 December 2013 for the term 'saliva AND testosterone AND exercise'.
  
  
  METHODS
  Studies (n = 21) selected from the 933 identified included randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 2), uncontrolled trials (UCTs; n = 18) and control trials (CTs; n = 1), all of which had an exercise component characterised as either aerobic, resistance or power training, each with acute sal-T and sal-C measurement obtained within 30 min of exercise bout completion.
  
  
  METHODS
  A meta-analysis was conducted on change in sal-T, sal-C and the sal-T:C ratio following exercise using standard difference in means (SDM) and a random effects model.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For aerobic, resistance and power exercise, the overall SDMs for sal-T were 0.891, 1.061 and 0.509, respectively; for sal-C, the SDMs were 3.041, 0.773 and 1.200, respectively. For sal-T:C, the SDMs were -2.014, 0.027 and -0.968, respectively. RCTs, UCTs and CTs were separated by subgroup analysis. There were significant differences in overall weighted SDM values for sal-T between RCTs, UCTs and CTs within exercise modes. When examining aerobic exercise interventions, a quantitative interaction of study design was observed. RCTs resulted in a greater SDM than UCTs (1.337 vs. 0.446). Power interventions displayed a qualitative interaction with study design. UCTs where baseline measures were obtained 24 h before exercise had an SDM of -1.128, whereas UCTs where baseline was determined immediately prior to exercise had an SDM of 0.486. The single CT trial had an SDM of 2.260. Resistance exercise interventions were primarily UCTs; however, an observed influence of baseline sampling time whereby immediately pre- and 24 h pre-exercise resulted in differing SDMs. The sole resistance exercise RCTs resulted in the greatest SDM (2.500).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The current body of evidence regarding acute responses of sal-T to exercise is weak. This meta-analysis identifies varying exercise-dependent effect sizes. Each appear to be greatly influenced by study design and sample timing. There is a need for more RCTs and a standardised methodology for the measurement of salivary hormones in order to better determine the effect of exercise modality.
authors: School of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, 166-220 Holloway Road, London, N7 8DB, UK, L.Hayes@Londonmet.ac.uk.
authors: Lawrence D
authors: LD
authors: Hayes
authors: Fergal M
authors: FM
authors: Grace
authors: Julien S
authors: JS
authors: Baker
authors: Nicholas
authors: N
authors: Sculthorpe
mesh_terms: D015444:Exercise / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D006854:Hydrocortisone / Q000378:metabolism*; D008297:Male; D055070:Resistance Training; D012463:Saliva / Q000378:metabolism*; D013739:Testosterone / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D013739:Testosterone; D006854:Hydrocortisone
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jun;25(6):1553-62
references: 21602645
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Feb;74(2):882-7
references: 8458810
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Oct;26(10):2783-90
references: 22124357
references: Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 1;65(1):277-83
references: 15665304
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):265-72
references: 23575361
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Feb;27(2):471-6
references: 22505132
references: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Nov;45(11):2044-51
references: 24136137
references: J Sports Sci. 2013;31(14):1614-23
references: 23710973
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):426-32
references: 18550957
references: Horm Metab Res. 2012 Feb;44(2):146-51
references: 22173991
references: Res Sports Med. 2013;21(4):343-54
references: 24067120
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Aug;91(2):569-80
references: 11457767
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jan;22(1):250-5
references: 18296983
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Nov;24(11):2908-19
references: 20703171
references: Steroids. 2012 Nov;77(13):1339-44
references: 22917632
references: Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129-33
references: 19463084
references: Am J Hum Biol. 2012 Nov-Dec;24(6):856-8
references: 22915557
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3319-25
references: 22076086
references: Clin Biochem Rev. 2006 Aug;27(3):139-46
references: 17268582
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Oct;24(10):2604-12
references: 20733522
references: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(3-4):194-9
references: 1761007
references: J Physiol Biochem. 2014 Dec;70(4):991-6
references: 25392260
references: J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Apr;52(2):221-7
references: 22531608
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):32-9
references: 20093968
references: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 Nov;29(10):1229-40
references: 15288702
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jan;28(1):194-200
references: 23539085
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Jan;25(1):23-31
references: 21157386
references: Horm Behav. 2012 Jan;61(1):17-22
references: 21983238
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jan;26(1):261-8
references: 22201698
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Mar;22(2):419-25
references: 18550956
references: Stress. 2010 Nov;13(6):528-32
references: 20666655
references: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Dec;98(6):546-55
references: 16972050
references: J Sports Sci. 2013;31(6):677-83
references: 23210744
references: Clin Chem. 1993 Aug;39(8):1723-5
references: 8353962
references: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Jan;108(1):60-7
references: 19910330
references: J Sci Med Sport. 2014 May;17(3):317-21
references: 23707139
references: Springerplus. 2013 Dec;2(1):18
references: 23396630
references: Bioessays. 2009 Aug;31(8):843-52
references: 19554609
references: Pathol Biol (Paris). 2004 Feb;52(1):43-9
references: 14761713
references: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Apr;105(6):919-27
references: 19142655
references: J Sports Sci. 2008 Aug;26(10):1067-72
references: 18608830
references: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Sep;90(1-2):23-8
references: 12783234
references: Physiol Behav. 2012 Jul 16;106(5):683-8
references: 22609482
references: Sports Med. 2006;36(3):215-38
references: 16526834
references: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Jan;9(1):166-72
references: 23628627
references: Horm Metab Res. 2013 Oct;45(11):827-33
references: 23794400
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Mar;26(3):625-32
references: 22310520
references: Br J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;38(3):260-3
references: 15155421
references: J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010 Mar;50(1):85-92
references: 20308978
references: Horm Behav. 2002 Dec;42(4):399-413
references: 12488107
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Apr;25(4):1072-8
references: 20703172
references: Int J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;28(6):470-9
references: 17111317
references: Biol Sport. 2013 Sep;30(3):173-80
references: 24744485
references: Sports Med. 2005;35(4):339-61
references: 15831061
references: Experientia. 1976;32(7):940-1
references: 954994
references: PLoS One. 2013 Oct 09;8(10):e78636
references: 24130904
references: J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Mar;27(3):738-47
references: 23443220