title: Morphology and syntax in late talkers at age 5.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study reports age 5 morphology and syntax skills in late talkers identified at age 2 (n=34) and typically developing comparison children (n=20).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The late talkers manifested significant morphological delays at ages 3 and 4 relative to comparison peers. Based on the 14 morphemes analyzed at age 5, the only significant group difference was on the third person regular -s inflection. This was also the only significant difference when we compared late talkers with continuing delay, late bloomers (who scored within 1 standard deviation of the comparison group in mean length of utterance), and typically developing peers. The late talker and comparison children differed greatly in mean total scores on the Index of Productive Syntax (Scarborough, 1990), a measure of syntactic complexity. The group with continuing delay scored significantly lower on the IPSyn than the late bloomer and typically developing groups, which did not differ from each other.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Findings are consistent with the higher order language group differences found through adolescence in these late talkers relative to comparison peers with similar socioeconomic status and similar nonverbal abilities, supporting the notion that late talkers have an ongoing weakness in language endowment that manifests differently over the course of development.
authors: Leslie
authors: L
authors: Rescorla
authors: Hannah L
authors: HL
authors: Turner
mesh_terms: D016022:Case-Control Studies; D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007805:Language Development Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D007807:Language Tests; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D013060:Speech
references: J Child Lang. 2000 Oct;27(3):643-64
references: 11089342
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):16-30
references: 18723598
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec;45(6):1219-31
references: 12546489
references: J Child Lang. 2003 Nov;30(4):769-95
references: 14686084
references: J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Nov;54(4):587-99
references: 2811339
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Mar;33(1):70-83
references: 2314086
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Dec;36(6):1271-5
references: 7710465
references: J Speech Hear Res. 1996 Dec;39(6):1239-57
references: 8959609
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Oct;40(5):1037-47
references: 9328875
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Apr;41(2):407-18
references: 9570592
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Dec;41(6):1412-31
references: 9859895
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Apr;48(2):459-72
references: 15989404
references: Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):253-74
references: 16702093
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Jun;49(3):548-71
references: 16787895
references: Clin Linguist Phon. 2007 Oct;21(10):747-58
references: 17882693
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):394-407
references: 18367685
references: Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jul-Aug;43(4):361-89
references: 17885825
references: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Apr;45(2):360-71
references: 12003517