title: Core knowledge and the emergence of symbols: The case of maps.
abstract: Map reading is unique to humans but present in people of diverse cultures, at ages as young as 4 years. Here we explore the nature and sources of this ability, asking both what geometric information young children use in maps and what non-symbolic systems are associated with their map-reading performance. Four-year-old children were given two tests of map-based navigation (placing an object within a small 3D surface layout at a position indicated on a 2D map), one focused on distance relations and the other on angle relations. Children also were given two non-symbolic tasks, testing their use of geometry for navigation (a reorientation task) and for visual form analysis (a deviant-detection task). Although children successfully performed both map tasks, their performance on the two map tasks was uncorrelated, providing evidence for distinct abilities to represent distance and angle on 2D maps of 3D surface layouts. In contrast, performance on each map task was associated with performance on one of the two non-symbolic tasks: map-based navigation by distance correlated with sensitivity to the shape of the environment in the reorientation task, whereas map-based navigation by angle correlated with sensitivity to the shapes of 2D forms and patterns in the deviant detection task. These findings suggest links between one uniquely human, emerging symbolic ability, geometric map use, and two core systems of geometry.
authors: State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
authors: Yi
authors: Y
authors: Huang
authors: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
authors: Elizabeth S
authors: ES
authors: Spelke
references: J Exp Biol. 2005 Sep;208(Pt 17):3233-47
references: 16109886
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51373
references: 23251511
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5915-20
references: 18408152
references: Anim Cogn. 2010 May;13(3):463-70
references: 19960217
references: Cogn Sci. 2010 May 1;34(5):863-884
references: 20625445
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):1-23
references: 15945200
references: Psychol Rev. 2009 Jul;116(3):540-66
references: 19618986
references: Cognition. 1986 Apr;22(3):201-23
references: 2424667
references: Child Dev. 2014 Jan-Feb;85(1):237-49
references: 23647223
references: Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):152-76
references: 20570252
references: Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):394-406
references: 20347435
references: Dev Sci. 2008 Mar;11(2):F1-7
references: 18333971
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Feb;19(1):20-6
references: 19299120
references: Nature. 2010 Feb 4;463(7281):657-61
references: 20090680
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Feb;19(1):12-9
references: 19303766
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):355-61
references: 18684662
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14
references: 15242690
references: Philos Psychol. 2008 Aug 1;21(4):491
references: 20165569
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):192-8
references: 21327347
references: Behav Brain Res. 1982 Sep;6(1):57-77
references: 7126325
references: Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1365-78
references: 22010896
references: Hum Evol. 2009 Jan 1;23(3):213-248
references: 21359132
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Oct;37(4):420-35
references: 21604907
references: Science. 2001 Aug 24;293(5534):1506-9
references: 11520991
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Feb;8(2):66-70
references: 15588810
references: Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):2763-79
references: 9071762
references: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Jan;13(1):90-9
references: 12466220
references: J Philos. 2009 Apr;106(4):220-254
references: 23136450
references: Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):743-9
references: 18801130
references: Nature. 2008 Oct 2;455(7213):665-8
references: 18776888
references: Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
references: 22006061
references: Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;18(5):290-294
references: 32489232
references: Child Dev. 1974 Sep;45(3):707-16
references: 4143827
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2784-93
references: 22927577
references: Cognition. 1984 Apr;16(3):225-60
references: 6541105
references: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1979;44(7):1-63
references: 537616
references: Nature. 2002 Mar 7;416(6876):90-4
references: 11882899
references: Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1292-300
references: 22010889
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jan;34(1):1-14
references: 18248111
references: Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):569-73
references: 17614863
references: Science. 2006 Jan 20;311(5759):381-4
references: 16424341
references: Cognition. 1996 Dec;61(3):195-232
references: 8990972
references: Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):144-61
references: 22257573
references: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1976;41(3):1-55
references: 980000
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):561-9
references: 20951631
references: Dev Sci. 2011 Jul;14(4):809-21
references: 21676100
references: Science. 1987 Dec 11;238(4833):1556-7
references: 2446392