title: Executive Function Among Preschool Children: Unitary Versus Distinct Abilities.
abstract: Working memory (WM) and inhibitory control (IC) are considered related but separable executive functions (EFs) among adults and adolescents. Although available evidence suggests that these constructs have not diverged especially among younger preschool children, questions remain regarding the age at which separable factors emerge. This study used confirmatory factor analysis to test a 2-factor model of EF among 289 preschool children whose ages ranged from 45 to 63 months (M= 55.74,SD= 7.56). As hypothesized, the model including separate but related factors provided a significantly better fit than a unitary model, indicating the presence of distinct WM and IC factors. Based on evidence that WM and IC measured during preschool relate differently to a variety of academic and behavioral outcomes, it was hypothesized that a model including separate factors for each EF would fit the observed data better than a single-factor model. Although the two-factor model provided the best fit for the full sample, the correlation between WM and IC factors was significantly higher for younger (ϕ =.95) than older (ϕ =.68) children, indicating increasing divergence as a function of age.
authors: Department of Psychology, Florida State University.
authors: Matthew D
authors: MD
authors: Lerner
authors: Department of Psychology, Florida State University ; Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University.
authors: Christopher J
authors: CJ
authors: Lonigan
keywords: executive function; inhibitory control; preschool children; working memory
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Feb;38(2):163-71
references: 19763816
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2010;35(6):679-97
references: 21038160
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):561-71
references: 16144427
references: Child Neuropsychol. 2003 Dec;9(4):267-76
references: 14972705
references: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
references: 10945922
references: Child Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;72(4):1032-53
references: 11480933
references: Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):836-51
references: 15355170
references: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 Aug;27(6):735-45
references: 16019649
references: J Educ Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;102(1):43-53
references: 20411025
references: Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Summer;17(3):785-806
references: 16262992
references: Soc Dev. 2009 May;18(2):305-323
references: 29081599
references: Cognition. 1994 Nov;53(2):129-53
references: 7805351
references: Child Neuropsychol. 2000 Sep;6(3):175-84
references: 11402395
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;27(1):51-63
references: 10197406
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):205-28
references: 18473197
references: Br J Educ Psychol. 2000 Jun;70 ( Pt 2):177-94
references: 10900777
references: Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1447-59
references: 18020823
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;41(2):169-79
references: 10750543
references: Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):306-17
references: 20528058
references: J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):436-52
references: 20884004
references: Psychol Bull. 2006 Jan;132(1):33-72
references: 16435957
references: Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):575-87
references: 18331145
references: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Oct;36(7):1097-107
references: 18437548
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;53(2):111-9
references: 22022931
references: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996 Feb;37(2):229-36
references: 8682904
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(3):273-93
references: 11758669
references: Child Dev. 1996 Apr;67(2):490-507
references: 8625724
references: Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):669-88
references: 16144432
references: Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):606-21
references: 19467014