title: Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing.
abstract: Oculomotor behavior reveals, not only the acquisition of visual information at fixation, but also the accumulation of information in memory across subsequent fixations. Two candidate measures were considered as indicators of such dynamic visual memory load: fixation duration and pupil size. While recording these measures, we displayed an arrangement of 3, 4 or 5 targets among distractors. Both occurred in various orientations. Participants searched for targets and reported whether in a subsequent display one of them had changed orientation. We determined to what extent fixation duration and pupil size indicate dynamic memory load, as a function of the number of targets fixated during the search. We found that fixation duration reflects the number of targets, both when this number is within and above the limit of working memory capacity. Pupil size reflects the number of targets only when it exceeds the capacity limit. Moreover, the duration of fixations on successive targets but not on distractors increases whereas pupil size does not. The increase in fixation duration with number of targets both within and above working memory capacity suggests that in free viewing fixation duration is sensitive to actual memory load as well as to processing load, whereas pupil size is indicative of processing load only. Two alternative models relating visual attention and working memory are considered relevant to these results. We discuss the results as supportive of a model which involves a temporary buffer in the interaction of attention and working memory.
authors: Laboratory for Perceptual Dynamics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
authors: Radha Nila
authors: RN
authors: Meghanathan
authors: Laboratory for Perceptual Dynamics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
authors: Cees
authors: C
authors: van Leeuwen
authors: Laboratory for Perceptual Dynamics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
authors: Andrey R
authors: AR
authors: Nikolaev
keywords: attention; eye movements; fixation duration; memory load; processing load; pupil size; visual search; working memory
references: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):308-16
references: 20139447
references: Spat Vis. 2000;14(1):59-75
references: 11334182
references: Psychol Bull. 1982 Mar;91(2):276-92
references: 7071262
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Feb 5;370(1661):20140197
references: 25533105
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):391-400
references: 23850263
references: Nature. 2001 Jul 26;412(6845):401
references: 11473303
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):372-7
references: 18488654
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 Jul;12(4):287-92
references: 11476094
references: Perception. 2003;32(5):579-92
references: 12854644
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):846-51
references: 18087948
references: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):38-70
references: 17227181
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 17;369(1641):20130215
references: 24639586
references: Psychol Res. 2008 Jan;72(1):99-105
references: 17021837
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Feb;60(2):211-29
references: 17455055
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):488-505
references: 21604913
references: Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54
references: 7413885
references: Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):745-69
references: 22823385