title: Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.
abstract: Cochlear implant (CI) users usually exhibit marked across-electrode differences in detection thresholds with "focused" modes of stimulation, such as partial-tripolar (pTP) mode. This may reflect differences either in local neural survival or in the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus. To shed light on these two explanations, we compared stimulus-detection thresholds and gap-detection thresholds (GDTs) at comfortably loud levels for at least four electrodes in each of ten Advanced Bionics CI users, using 1031-pps pulse trains. The electrodes selected for each user had a wide range of stimulus-detection thresholds in pTP mode. We also measured across-electrode variations in both stimulus-detection and gap-detection tasks in monopolar (MP) mode. Both stimulus-detection and gap-detection thresholds correlated across modes. However, there was no significant correlation between stimulus-detection and gap-detection thresholds in either mode. Hence, gap-detection thresholds likely tap a source of across-electrode variation additional to, or different from, that revealed by stimulus-detection thresholds. Stimulus-detection thresholds were significantly lower for apical than for basal electrodes in both modes; this was only true for gap detection in pTP mode. Finally, although the across-electrode standard deviation in stimulus-detection thresholds was greater in pTP than in MP mode, the reliability of these differences--assessed by dividing the across-electrode standard deviation by the standard deviation across adaptive runs for each electrode--was similar for the two modes; this metric was also similar across modes for gap detection. Hence across-electrode differences can be revealed using clinically available MP stimulation, with a reliability comparable to that observed with focused stimulation.
authors: Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd St., Seattle, WA, 98105, USA, jbierer@u.washington.edu.
authors: Julie Arenberg
authors: JA
authors: Bierer
authors: John M
authors: JM
authors: Deeks
authors: Alexander J
authors: AJ
authors: Billig
authors: Robert P
authors: RP
authors: Carlyon
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1649-57
references: 19275322
references: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;100(1):92-107
references: 18450583
references: Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):247-58
references: 20090533
references: Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):367-79
references: 20124902
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 May;127(5):2997-3008
references: 21117749
references: Hear Res. 2011 May;275(1-2):130-8
references: 21168479
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3908-15
references: 21682413
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 May;131(5):4030-41
references: 22559376
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Apr;15(2):293-304
references: 24477546
references: Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):641-51
references: 25036146
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):13-20
references: 14723489
references: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Mar;5(1):11-24
references: 14605920
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 May;87(5):2178-87
references: 2348022
references: BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):446
references: 7873953
references: Hear Res. 1997 Jun;108(1-2):112-44
references: 9213127
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):1061-74
references: 9714925
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):1925-39
references: 10530017
references: Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Dec;20(11):3131-40
references: 15579167
references: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Mar;121(3):1642-53
references: 17407901
references: J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):531-42
references: 19923242