title: Neural responses to category ambiguous words.
abstract: Category ambiguous words (like hug and swing) have the potential to complicate both learning and processing of language. However, uses of such words may be disambiguated by acoustic differences that depend on the category of use. This article uses an event-related potential (ERP) technique to ask whether adult native speakers of English show neural sensitivity to those differences. The results indicate that noun and verb tokens of ambiguous words produce differences in the amplitude of the ERP response over left anterior sites as early as 100ms following stimulus onset and persisting for over 400ms. Nonsense words extracted from noun and verb contexts do not show such differences. These findings suggest that the acoustic differences between noun and verb tokens of ambiguous words are perceived and processed by adults and may be part of the lexical representation of the word.
authors: North Dakota State University, NDSU Department, 2765, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA. Electronic address: Erin.R.Conwell@ndsu.edu.
authors: Erin
authors: E
authors: Conwell
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Event related potential; Lexical category ambiguity; Lexical representation; Prosody
references: Cognition. 2003 Nov;90(1):91-117
references: 14597271
references: Cogn Psychol. 2014 May;70:1-30
references: 24480453
references: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Apr;60(3):355-76
references: 9599989
references: Infancy. 2000 Jan;1(1):123-147
references: 32680315
references: Biol Psychol. 2009 Jan;80(1):46-51
references: 18789570
references: Psychophysiology. 2010 Sep;47(5):888-904
references: 20374541
references: Brain Lang. 1996 Sep;54(3):388-413
references: 8866055
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Jun;46(6):709-14
references: 87317
references: Lang Learn Dev. 2012;8(2):87-112
references: 34733122
references: J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):574-608
references: 19190721
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:509-35
references: 10074686
references: Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):143-82
references: 15925574
references: J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Mar;25(2):193-247
references: 8667297
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):561-77
references: 12126498
references: Behav Biol. 1973 Dec;9(6):755-61
references: 4764256
references: Brain. 2000 Dec;123 Pt 12:2552-66
references: 11099456
references: Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):127-52
references: 10731765
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976 Aug;41(2):113-23
references: 58774
references: J Child Lang. 1987 Feb;14(1):145-67
references: 3558521
references: Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):497-506
references: 10450894
references: Cognition. 1978 Jun;6(2):135-53
references: 679646
references: Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):206-19
references: 10089756