title: Implications of polychronous neuronal groups for the continuity of mind.
abstract: Is conceptual space continuous? The answer to this question depends on how concepts are represented in the brain. Vector space representations, which ground conceptual states in the instantaneous firing rates of neurons, have successfully captured cognitive dynamics in a broad range of domains. There is a growing body of evidence, however, that conceptual information is encoded in spatiotemporal patterns of neural spikes, sometimes called polychronous neuronal groups (PNGs). The use of PNGs to represent conceptual states, rather than employing a continuous vector space, introduces new challenges, including issues of temporally extended representations, meaning through symbol grounding, compositionality, and representational similarity. In this article, we explore how PNGs support discontinuous transitions between concepts. While the continuous dynamics of vector space approaches require such transitions to activate intermediate and blended concepts, PNGs offer the means to change the activation of concepts discretely, introducing a form of conceptual dynamics unavailable to vector space models.
authors: University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA. wst.clair@ucmerced.edu.
authors: William Benjamin
authors: WB
authors: St Clair
authors: University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA. dnoelle@ucmerced.edu.
authors: David C
authors: DC
authors: Noelle
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001921:Brain / Q000166:cytology* / Q000502:physiology*; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Dynamical systems; Neural representation; Philosophy of mind
references: Neural Comput. 2006 Feb;18(2):245-82
references: 16378515
references: Neuroscience. 2007 Aug 10;148(1):294-303
references: 17614210
references: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;73(2):713-26
references: 7760130
references: Science. 1987 Sep 11;237(4820):1317-23
references: 3629243
references: Phys Biol. 2007 Oct 09;4(3):181-93
references: 17928657
references: Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 Jan 05;4:154
references: 21258641
references: Neuroscience. 2008 Jun 2;153(4):1354-69
references: 18448256
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2443-52
references: 17220510
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2013 Apr;34(2):185-209
references: 22878688
references: Neuron. 2004 Sep 30;44(1):23-30
references: 15450157
references: Front Comput Neurosci. 2011 May 18;5:21
references: 21629770
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):41-53
references: 15789168
references: Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):1026-39
references: 19744941
references: J Comput Neurosci. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(2):179-201
references: 15306739