title: Acromioclavicular third degree dislocation: surgical treatment in acute cases.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The management of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation remains controversial, and the debate about whether patients should be conservatively or surgically treated continues. This study aims to compare conservative and surgical treatment of acute type III ACJ injuries in active sport participants (<35 years of age) by analysing clinical and radiological results after a minimum of 24 months follow-up.
  
  
  METHODS
  The records of 72 patients with acute type III ACJ dislocations who were treated from January 2006 to December 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were categorised into two groups. group A included 25 patients treated conservatively, and group B included 30 patients treated surgically with the TightRope™ system. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were evaluated at final follow-up with these clinical scores: Constant, University of California Los Angeles scale (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale (ASES) and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) and with a subjective evaluation of the patient satisfaction, aesthetic results and shoulder function. The distance between the acromion and clavicle and between the coracoid process and clavicle were evaluated radiographically and compared with preoperative values. Δ, the difference in mm between the distance at the final follow-up and at T0 in the injured shoulder, and α, the side-to-side difference in mm at follow-up, were calculated. Heterotopic ossification and postoperative osteolysis were evaluated in both groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no major intraoperative complications in the surgical group. The subjective parameters significantly differed between the two groups. Constant, ASES and UCLA scores were similar in both groups (P > 0.05), whereas ACJI results favoured the surgical group (group A, 72.4; group B, 87.9; P < 0.05). All measurements of radiographic evaluation were significantly reduced in the surgical group compared with the conservative group. In group A, we detected calcifications in 30% of patients; in group B we detected two cases of moderate osteolysis and calcifications in 70% of patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although better subjective and radiographic results were achieved in surgically treated patients, traditional objective scores did not show significant differences between the two groups. Our results cannot support routine use of surgery to treat type III ACJ dislocations.
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. angelo.decarli@gmail.com.
authors: Angelo
authors: A
authors: De Carli
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. riccardolanzetti@gmail.com.
authors: Riccardo Maria
authors: RM
authors: Lanzetti
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. alessandro.ciompi@gmail.com.
authors: Alessandro
authors: A
authors: Ciompi
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. domenico.lupariello@gmail.com.
authors: Domenico
authors: D
authors: Lupariello
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. Pprota7@hotmail.com.
authors: Pierpaolo
authors: P
authors: Rota
authors: Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. aferretti51@virgilio.it.
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Ferretti
mesh_terms: D000173:Acromioclavicular Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries*; D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D004204:Joint Dislocations / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D000068958:Return to Sport; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):550-6
references: 12469078
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1966 Apr;48(3):475-86
references: 5929792
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):300-5
references: 16679228
references: Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1507-16
references: 21436458
references: Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):328-31
references: 14977655
references: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):235-41
references: 23749341
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;12(5):442-5
references: 14564264
references: Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1929-36
references: 15572323
references: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jul;133(7):985-95
references: 23632779
references: Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;31(5):648-55
references: 12975181
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jul;(268):112-9
references: 2060198
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1983 Oct;54(5):743-5
references: 6670492
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Sep;54(6):1187-94
references: 4652050
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Sep;69(7):1045-51
references: 3654696
references: Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):236-46
references: 16282577
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4
references: 3791738
references: Pol J Radiol. 2013 Oct;78(4):15-20
references: 24505220
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Aug;93(8):1088-92
references: 21768634
references: Am J Sports Med. 2008 Dec;36(12):2398-406
references: 18765674
references: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Oct;128(10):1153-7
references: 18038141
references: Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971 Jul;112(3):493-506
references: 5570359
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 May;78(3):410-2
references: 8636176
references: Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006 Dec;14(4):237-45
references: 17135974
references: Orthopedics. 2012 Jan;35(1):e18-22
references: 22229608
references: Am J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2141-8
references: 24989491
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;12(6):599-602
references: 14671526
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Mar-Apr;(155):7-20
references: 7226634
references: Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb;29(2):387-97
references: 23369483
references: Am J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1142-6
references: 16002483
references: J Athl Train. 2004 Mar;39(1):10-11
references: 15085205
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52
references: 22958838
references: Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Oct;73(5):566-70
references: 18019910
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Nov;71(5):848-50
references: 2684990
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):220-5
references: 18249565
references: Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):950-7
references: 20228243
references: Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):699-703
references: 11734479
references: Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):831-8
references: 24178060
references: Orthopade. 2003 May;32(5):432-6
references: 12743695
references: Arthroscopy. 2011 Feb;27(2):294-8
references: 21266279
references: Arthroscopy. 2003 Jul-Aug;19(6):641-61
references: 12861203
references: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954 May;36-B(2):202-8
references: 13163102
references: Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1179-87
references: 20442326
references: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jul;20(5):e6-10
references: 21489825
references: Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):40-5
references: 19111217
references: Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):234-7
references: 11292052