title: The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells.
abstract: High current densities in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) result from the predominance of various Geobacter species on the anode, but it is not known if archaeal communities similarly converge to one specific genus. MECs were examined here on the basis of maximum methane production and current density relative to the inoculum community structure. We used anaerobic digester (AD) sludge dominated by acetoclastic Methanosaeta, and an anaerobic bog sediment where hydrogenotrophic methanogens were detected. Inoculation using solids to medium ratio of 25% (w/v) resulted in the highest methane production rates (0.27 mL mL(-1) cm(-2), gas volume normalized by liquid volume and cathode projected area) and highest peak current densities (0.5 mA cm(-2)) for the bog sample. Methane production was independent of solid to medium ratio when AD sludge was used as the inoculum. 16S rRNA gene community analysis using pyrosequencing and quantitative PCR confirmed the convergence of Archaea to Methanobacterium and Methanobrevibacter, and of Bacteria to Geobacter, despite their absence in AD sludge. Combined with other studies, these findings suggest that Archaea of the hydrogenotrophic genera Methanobacterium and Methanobrevibacter are the most important microorganisms for methane production in MECs and that their presence in the inoculum improves the performance.
authors: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State University University Park, PA, USA.
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Siegert
authors: School of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University Wuxi, China.
authors: Xiu-Fen
authors: XF
authors: Li
authors: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State University University Park, PA, USA.
authors: Matthew D
authors: MD
authors: Yates
authors: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Penn State University University Park, PA, USA.
authors: Bruce E
authors: BE
authors: Logan
keywords: Geobacter; Methanobacterium; Methanobrevibacter; biocathode; bog sediment; electromethanogenesis; microbially influenced corrosion; power-to-gas
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jan 15;42(2):629-34
references: 18284174
references: J Microbiol Methods. 2011 Jan;84(1):12-8
references: 20940022
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Sep 1;40(17):5206-11
references: 16999090
references: Bioresour Technol. 2010 May;101(9):3085-90
references: 20074943
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 15;43(24):9519-24
references: 20000550
references: Water Res. 2009 Mar;43(5):1480-8
references: 19138783
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 May 1;42(9):3401-6
references: 18522125
references: J Biosci Bioeng. 2011 Jan;111(1):47-9
references: 20840887
references: Archaea. 2013;2013:481784
references: 24187516
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan 7;41(1):e1
references: 22933715
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;97(22):9885-95
references: 23775270
references: ISME J. 2014 Aug;8(8):1673-81
references: 24844759
references: Microb Ecol. 2004 Aug;48(2):178-90
references: 15546038
references: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002 Oct 1;42(1):119-29
references: 19709271
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):5066-72
references: 11055964
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jun 1;39(11):4317-20
references: 15984815
references: Microbiology. 2002 Jan;148(Pt 1):257-66
references: 11782518
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jun;65(6):2402-8
references: 10347020
references: Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):829-32
references: 14985759
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2300-6
references: 11976101
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Dec;78(23):8412-20
references: 23001672
references: ISME J. 2012 Nov;6(11):2002-13
references: 22572637
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Dec 1;42(23):8630-40
references: 19192774
references: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010 Jan 1;105(1):69-78
references: 19688868
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(9):2882-6
references: 21378039
references: Microb Ecol. 2011 May;61(4):821-31
references: 21243351
references: PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27310
references: 22194782
references: Science. 2012 Aug 10;337(6095):686-90
references: 22879507
references: Bioresour Technol. 2013 May;136:322-8
references: 23567698
references: Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014 Mar;172(5):2720-31
references: 24425301
references: ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2014 Apr 7;2(4):910-917
references: 24741468
references: J Bacteriol. 1964 May;87(5):993-8
references: 5874549
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188-96
references: 17947321
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Nov;74(21):6663-71
references: 18776026
references: Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jul;3(7):460-70
references: 11553236
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 May 15;43(10):3953-8
references: 19544913
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Oct 15;43(20):7971-6
references: 19921922
references: MBio. 2010 May 25;1(2):null
references: 20714445
references: Biosens Bioelectron. 2011 Jul 15;26(11):4526-31
references: 21652198
references: Water Res. 2012 May 1;46(7):2425-34
references: 22374298
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2005 May 1;39(9):3069-76
references: 15926554
references: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Apr;82(5):829-36
references: 19050859
references: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):1004-9
references: 17328216
references: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;75(13):4435-42
references: 19447957