title: Experimental manipulation of avian social structure reveals segregation is carried over across contexts.
abstract: Our current understanding of animal social networks is largely based on observations or experiments that do not directly manipulate associations between individuals. Consequently, evidence relating to the causal processes underlying such networks is limited. By imposing specified rules controlling individual access to feeding stations, we directly manipulated the foraging social network of a wild bird community, thus demonstrating how external factors can shape social structure. We show that experimentally imposed constraints were carried over into patterns of association at unrestricted, ephemeral food patches, as well as at nesting sites during breeding territory prospecting. Hence, different social contexts can be causally linked, and constraints at one level may have consequences that extend into other aspects of sociality. Finally, the imposed assortment was lost following the cessation of the experimental manipulation, indicating the potential for previously perturbed social networks of wild animals to recover from segregation driven by external constraints.
authors: Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK joshua.firth@zoo.ox.ac.uk.
authors: Josh A
authors: JA
authors: Firth
authors: Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
authors: Ben C
authors: BC
authors: Sheldon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004739:England; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D009425:Nesting Behavior; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000502:physiology*; D012919:Social Behavior
keywords: Paridae; associations; assortativity; resilience; social interactions; social network
references: Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):497-500
references: 17148272
references: PLoS One. 2014 May 09;9(5):e96937
references: 24816811
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1189-94
references: 20926437
references: Curr Biol. 2013 Oct 21;23(20):R915-6
references: 24156807
references: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2007;62(1):15-27
references: 32214613
references: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Feb;67(2 Pt 2):026126
references: 12636767
references: Psychometrika. 2007 Dec;72(4):563-581
references: 20084106
references: Am J Primatol. 2011 Aug;73(8):775-89
references: 21563205
references: Ecol Lett. 2013 Nov;16(11):1365-72
references: 24047530
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 22;279(1745):4199-205
references: 22915668
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;28(9):541-51
references: 23856617
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1168-75
references: 21937498
references: J R Soc Interface. 2012 Nov 7;9(76):3055-66
references: 22696481
references: Nature. 2006 Jan 26;439(7075):426-9
references: 16437106
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2108-18
references: 22734054
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):502-7
references: 21715042
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1009-14
references: 19129113
references: Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Nov 11;89(20):208701
references: 12443515
references: Science. 2013 Apr 26;340(6131):485-8
references: 23620054
references: Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215-23
references: 327542
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 7;273(1586):513-22
references: 16537121
references: Am Nat. 2010 Sep;176(3):E80-9
references: 20608873
references: Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209-20
references: 6018555
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S186-8
references: 14667378
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 22;268(1479):1901-5
references: 11564345
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Feb 22;277(1681):633-42
references: 19889705
references: Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):998-1007
references: 24894316