title: Causal reasoning with forces.
abstract: Causal composition allows people to generate new causal relations by combining existing causal knowledge. We introduce a new computational model of such reasoning, the force theory, which holds that people compose causal relations by simulating the processes that join forces in the world, and compare this theory with the mental model theory (Khemlani et al., 2014) and the causal model theory (Sloman et al., 2009), which explain causal composition on the basis of mental models and structural equations, respectively. In one experiment, the force theory was uniquely able to account for people's ability to compose causal relationships from complex animations of real-world events. In three additional experiments, the force theory did as well as or better than the other two theories in explaining the causal compositions people generated from linguistically presented causal relations. Implications for causal learning and the hierarchical structure of causal knowledge are discussed.
authors: Department of Psychology, Emory University Atlanta, GA, USA.
authors: Phillip
authors: P
authors: Wolff
authors: Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL, USA.
authors: Aron K
authors: AK
authors: Barbey
keywords: causal learning; causal models; causal reasoning; knowledge structures; lexical semantics; mental simulation
references: Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):616-23; discussion 624-7
references: 22730923
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):191-221
references: 20438249
references: Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Oct 28;8:849
references: 25389398
references: Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):931-7
references: 20548058
references: Cogn Psychol. 2010 Dec;61(4):303-32
references: 20801434
references: Cogn Psychol. 2001 Aug;43(1):1-22
references: 11487292
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):822-51
references: 16524000
references: Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Jan 25;6:112
references: 23355813
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):979-93
references: 21480755
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:227-54
references: 16318595
references: Perception. 1984;13(3):287-305
references: 6514514
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
references: 11301525
references: Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1060-70
references: 11105532
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Feb;136(1):82-111
references: 17324086
references: Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;33(1):21-50
references: 21585462
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Aug;4(8):299-309
references: 10904254
references: Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):579-93
references: 17509553
references: Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):589-615
references: 22730922
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18327-32
references: 24145417
references: Ethics. 1993 Jan;103(2):250-79
references: 11656191
references: J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1979-87
references: 24478377