title: Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Outcome reporting bias has received widespread recognition and been considered to pose two threats to the validity of clinical decision making because they overestimate the effect of treatments or distort the results of trials. However, the problem of outcome-reporting bias has not been systematically studied among randomized clinical trials of acupuncture. Our objectives were to evaluate the consistency between the registered records and subsequent publications with respect to outcomes and other data as well as to determine whether outcome-reporting bias favors significant primary outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic search of 15 registries was conducted from their inception to January 2014 to identify randomized clinical trials on acupuncture for which the status was listed as 'completed.' The subsequent publications were retrieved by searching PubMed and three Chinese databases. Basic characteristics and the registration information were extracted from the registered records and publications. We performed comparisons regarding primary outcomes and other data between the registered records and subsequent publications to assess the consistency and selective outcome reporting.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighty-eight trials on acupuncture with 96 published reports were identified. Only 19.3% (17/88) were registered before the start of the trial, suggesting prospective registration. The trial registration number was unavailable in 36 published reports (37.5%). A comparison of registered and published primary outcomes could be conducted in 71 publications (74.0%), and the inconsistency of the primary outcomes was identified in 45.1% (32 of 71); 71.4% (15 of 21) had a discrepancy that favored statistically significant primary outcomes, while 28.6% (6 of 21) favored nonsignificant primary outcomes. Furthermore, the other inconsistencies between the registry records and subsequent publications involved the inclusion criteria (54.7%), exclusion criteria (47.9%) and controls (22.9%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We find that prospective registration for randomized clinical trials on acupuncture is insufficient, selective outcome reporting is prevalent, and the change of primary outcomes is intended to favor statistical significance. These discrepancies in outcome reporting may lead to biased and misleading results of randomized clinical trials on acupuncture. To ensure publication of reliable and unbiased results, further promotion and implementation of trial registration are still needed.
authors: Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. susu18182004@126.com.|School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China. susu18182004@126.com.
authors: Chun-Xiang
authors: CX
authors: Su
authors: Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. hanmeizoujin@163.com.
authors: Mei
authors: M
authors: Han
authors: Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. renjunmay@foxmail.com.
authors: Jun
authors: J
authors: Ren
authors: Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. 303223969@qq.com.
authors: Wen-Yuan
authors: WY
authors: Li
authors: School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China. yueliang874@126.com.
authors: Shu-Jin
authors: SJ
authors: Yue
authors: School of Nursing, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China. haoyufang0903@sina.com.
authors: Yu-Fang
authors: YF
authors: Hao
authors: Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China. jianping_l@hotmail.com.
authors: Jian-Ping
authors: JP
authors: Liu
mesh_terms: D015670:Acupuncture Therapy; D015982:Bias; D006801:Humans; D017594:Publication Bias; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012042:Registries; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Apr 5;138(13-14):197-203
references: 18389392
references: J Eval Clin Pract. 2002 Aug;8(3):353-9
references: 12164983
references: BMJ. 2013;347:f5248
references: 24014339
references: BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):753
references: 15681569
references: Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):193-6
references: 23732270
references: JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2457-65
references: 15161896
references: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 16;351(12):1250-1
references: 15356289
references: JAMA. 2007 Feb 7;297(5):468-70
references: 17284696
references: Clin Chem. 2014 Apr;60(4):651-9
references: 24381228
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7
references: 17540818
references: BMJ. 2011;342:c7153
references: 21212122
references: PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000144
references: 19901971
references: CMAJ. 2004 Sep 28;171(7):735-40
references: 15451835
references: BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 16;3(7):null
references: 23864210
references: BMJ. 2008;337:a2299
references: 19056791
references: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Aug 3;153(3):158-66
references: 20679560
references: BMJ. 2010;340:c365
references: 20156912
references: Lancet. 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):201
references: 18640445
references: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Apr;66(4):286-9
references: 21652522
references: PLoS One. 2008;3(8):e3081
references: 18769481
references: JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):977-84
references: 19724045
references: JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):516-23
references: 12876095
references: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49599
references: 23166724
references: Contemp Clin Trials. 2005 Jun;26(3):331-7
references: 15911467
references: J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 10;30(2):210-6
references: 22162583
references: Ann Surg. 2013 May;257(5):818-23
references: 23407296