title: A new method for scoring financial conflicts of interest.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There is a large and consistent body of evidence showing that research sponsored by for-profit industries tends to have pro-industry conclusions in comparison with similar research or re-analyses not funded by industry. Disclosure of financial conflicts via statements is presently the standard method for notification of potential biases. However, many journals are not consistent in publishing financial conflicts of interest (FCoI) statements. Furthermore, even when divulged, disclosure merely shifts the burden of evaluating conflicts to readers and the general public. Moreover, there has been an absence of a means of quantifying FCoI.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To propose a solution for the question: What are we doing about FCoI that continue to compromise the integrity of the scientific enterprise?
  
  
  METHODS
  The FCoI Scale was developed for scoring and comparing FCoI and describing potential biases.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The FCoI Scale consists of a score that may be expressed in whole numbers and decimal fractions, correlated to descriptive terms for potential biases and examples of financial conflicts at 11 levels.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The FCoI score (FCoIS) provides a means for a more uniform and concise method of disclosure compared to statements, while at the same time permitting flexibility. It encourages the disclosure of relevant information and transparency in the reporting of financial conflicts. The FCoI Scale has the potential to become the standard basis for measuring, reporting, and comparing financial conflicts, suitable for disciplines in science, medicine, and beyond.
authors: S V M
authors: SV
authors: Maharaj
mesh_terms: D016265:Conflict of Interest / Q000191:economics*; D030881:Disclosure; D004782:Environmental Health / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods*; D005378:Financial Support; D016272:Occupational Health / Q000941:ethics
keywords: Campaign contributions,; Ethics,; FCoIS,; Industry or corporate funding,; Instrument or scale,; International organizations,; Public health and policy,; Scientific and medical journals and publishing,; Scientific societies and professional associations
references: Lancet. 2000 Aug 19;356(9230):635-8
references: 10968436
references: BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70
references: 12775614
references: JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):921-8
references: 12928469
references: CMAJ. 2004 Feb 17;170(4):477-80
references: 14970094
references: Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005 Oct-Dec;11(4):349-55
references: 16350468
references: BMJ. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):782
references: 17028106
references: Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jan;115(1):1-4
references: 17366811
references: Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007 Jan-Mar;13(1):107-17
references: 17427355
references: PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e184
references: 17550302
references: Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;13(2):222-32
references: 17718180
references: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2047-53
references: 17954797
references: Int J Occup Environ Health. 2007 Oct-Dec;13(4):404-26
references: 18085054
references: N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60
references: 18199864
references: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:MR000033
references: 23235689
references: Fam Pract. 2001 Dec;18(6):565-8
references: 11739337
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1957-60
references: 16199844