title: The effective founder effect in a spatially expanding population.
abstract: The gradual loss of diversity and the establishment of clines in allele frequencies associated with range expansions are patterns observed in many species, including humans. These patterns can result from a series of founder events occurring as populations colonize previously unoccupied areas. We develop a model of an expanding population and, using a branching process approximation, show that spatial gradients reflect different amounts of genetic drift experienced by different subpopulations. We then use this model to measure the net average strength of the founder effect, and we demonstrate that the predictions from the branching process model fit simulation results well. We further show that estimates of the effective founder size are robust to potential confounding factors such as migration between subpopulations. We apply our method to data from Arabidopsis thaliana. We find that the average founder effect is approximately three times larger in the Americas than in Europe, possibly indicating that a more recent, rapid expansion occurred.
authors: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720; Current address: Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637. bp@berkeley.edu.
authors: Benjamin M
authors: BM
authors: Peter
authors: Montgomery
authors: M
authors: Slatkin
mesh_terms: D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018703:Founder Effect; D005787:Gene Frequency; D040961:Genetic Drift; D005828:Genetics, Population; D008957:Models, Genetic; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D011156:Population Density
keywords: Biogeography; gene flow; population genetics; population structure
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Mar;23(3):482-90
references: 16280540
references: Nature. 2011 Jul 13;475(7357):493-6
references: 21753753
references: Mol Ecol. 1998 Apr;7(4):453-64
references: 9628000
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):15942-7
references: 16243969
references: Nature. 1987 Jan 1-7;325(6099):31-6
references: 3025745
references: Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):2025-35
references: 12524368
references: PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000491
references: 19714206
references: Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(11):2237-45
references: 17561887
references: Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Aug;87:75-89
references: 23291619
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17758-64
references: 23077256
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19926-30
references: 18056799
references: Genetics. 2008 Jun;179(2):941-50
references: 18505864
references: Bioinformatics. 2010 Dec 1;26(23):2993-4
references: 20956243
references: Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3403-13
references: 15487999
references: Genetics. 2011 Oct;189(2):579-93
references: 21775469
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16057-62
references: 19706453
references: Genetics. 2012 May;191(1):171-81
references: 22367031
references: Science. 2013 Dec 13;342(6164):1337-42
references: 24337289
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jul;75(7):3531-4
references: 16592546
references: PLoS Biol. 2005 Jul;3(7):e196
references: 15907155
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 19;108(29):11983-8
references: 21730125
references: Evolution. 2013 Nov;67(11):3274-89
references: 24152007
references: Nat Genet. 2012 Jan 08;44(2):212-6
references: 22231484
references: PLoS Genet. 2008 May 16;4(5):e1000075
references: 18483550
references: Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):853-64
references: 15012760
references: Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):972-83
references: 17439625