title: Benefits of pair housing are consistent across a diverse population of rhesus macaques.
abstract: Introducing singly housed rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) into isosexual pairs is widely considered to improve welfare. The population of laboratory rhesus macaques is heterogeneous on a variety of factors and there is little literature available to directly evaluate the influence of many of these factors on the benefits of pair housing. Subjects were 46 adult female and 18 adult male rhesus macaques housed at the Tulane National Primate Research Center and the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. Behavioral data totalling 859 h and serum cortisol levels derived from 312 serum samples were analyzed for main effects of housing condition, comparing single housing to pair housing. In addition, a series of analyses were performed to test for interactions between housing condition and seven independent variables: sex, age, prior duration of single housing, presence or absence of a history of self-injurious behavior, and dominance rank, levels of affiliation and agonism in the paired setting. After the collection of 4-8 h of baseline data and three serum cortisol samples, pairs of individuals were introduced to one another and data collection was repeated, no earlier than 4 weeks after introduction. In pair housing both female and male subjects showed decrease in abnormal behavior (females: 54% reduction;P= 0.001; males: 18% reduction;P= 0.0007) and anxiety-related behavior (females: 35% reduction;P= 0.0001; males: 41% reduction;P= 0.0001), and increases in locomotion (females: 41% increase;P= 0.0001; males: 76% increase:P= 0.002). In pair housing, there were no significant sex differences in social behavior. Descriptively, paired females spent 12% of samples engaged in affiliative behavior and 0.5% engaged in agonistic behavior (back-transformed arcsin square root means). The corresponding values for males were 12% and 0.3%. No interaction effects were detected with any of the independent variables tested in this study. Cortisol values varied with sex but did not differ between housing conditions; no differences were detected when any of the above variables were included in the statistical model. Results support the general consensus among those studying the welfare of captive primates that social housing is a potent means for promoting behavioral indicators of the psychological well-being of laboratory primates. These results are of considerable practical significance and include information that refutes common perceptions about the unsuitability of males as socialization candidates, perceived negative.
authors: Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
authors: Kate C
authors: KC
authors: Baker
authors: Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
authors: Mollie A
authors: MA
authors: Bloomsmith
authors: Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
authors: Brooke
authors: B
authors: Oettinger
authors: Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
authors: Kimberly
authors: K
authors: Neu
authors: Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
authors: Caroline
authors: C
authors: Griffis
authors: Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
authors: Valérie
authors: V
authors: Schoof
authors: Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, LA 70433, USA.
authors: Margaret
authors: M
authors: Maloney
keywords: Behavioral management; Cortisol; Primate; Social; Welfare
references: Dev Psychobiol. 2001 Jul;39(1):40-5
references: 11507708
references: Am J Primatol. 1994;32(2):73-94
references: 31936914
references: Physiol Behav. 1994 Apr;55(4):681-4
references: 8190794
references: Endocrine. 2005 Mar;26(2):89-97
references: 15888920
references: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Feb 15;67(4):323-30
references: 20015482
references: Am J Primatol. 2007 Apr;69(4):377-94
references: 17171695
references: Am J Primatol. 1996;40(3):247-260
references: 31918516
references: Am J Primatol. 2003 Jan;59(1):3-19
references: 12526035
references: J Exp Anim Sci. 1991;34(2):73-6
references: 1883872
references: Behav Ecol. 2010 Sep;21(5):972-978
references: 22475990
references: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 1998 May;37(3):47-50
references: 12456160
references: Am Psychol. 1988 Oct;43(10):765-73
references: 3195796
references: J Med Primatol. 2011 Apr;40(2):71-8
references: 21371035
references: Physiol Behav. 1993 Mar;53(3):599-602
references: 8451329
references: Am J Primatol. 2003 May;60(1):1-15
references: 12766938
references: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jul;85(7):2556-63
references: 10902808
references: J Comp Psychol. 2008 Feb;122(1):62-7
references: 18298282
references: Physiol Behav. 2008 Jul 5;94(4):586-94
references: 18486158
references: Am J Primatol. 1994;33(2):89-99
references: 31936932
references: J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2009;12(1):61-72
references: 19107665
references: Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003 Sep;42(5):21-3
references: 14510519
references: Am J Primatol. 2008 Jun;70(6):542-50
references: 18189243
references: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2000 Nov;25(8):799-817
references: 10996475
references: Stress. 2008 Nov;11(6):467-76
references: 18609299