title: Identity and conflicts in the ethics of neural implants.
abstract: The development of neuroprosthetics has given rise to significant theoretical and practical challenges concerning personal identity. The Extended Mind Theory (EMT) attempts to provide an answer to these challenges by arguing that the mind and the external world are co-extensive to the point that both can make a seamless unified entity. The EMT also proposes that physical states determine the nature of mental states. Here, we propose a non-deterministic and less locationist view of mental states that we will call iEMT. The iEMT articulates, firstly, that the co-extensivity of the mind and the world does not justify the dissolution of the mind in the objects of the external world with which the mind interacts. Consequently, the agent's mind is still part of his unique personal identity. Secondly, neural implants cannot be regarded as mere replacement parts in the context of a weak concept of personal identity. Thirdly, there are no compelling reasons to believe or to fear that neuroprosthetics can alter personal identity at the profound level.
authors: Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra. 31009 Pamplona. Spain. lecharte@unav.es.
authors: L E
authors: LE
authors: Echarte
authors: Instituto Cultura y Sociedad, Universidad de Navarra. 31009 Pamplona. Spain. garciaval@unav.es.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: García-Valdecasas
mesh_terms: D001828:Body Image; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000601:surgery*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D019222:Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical; D028723:Personhood; D019736:Prostheses and Implants / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology; D011603:Psychophysiology; D012649:Self Concept; D056345:Theory of Mind