title: Effects of color temperatures (kelvin) of LED bulbs on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and ocular development indices of broilers grown to heavy weights.
abstract: Limited data are available for comparing light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs that are currently available in commercial broiler production facilities. We evaluated the effects of color temperatures (kelvin) of LED bulbs on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and ocular development indices of broilers grown to heavy weights (>3.0 kg). The experiment had a randomized complete block design. Four treatments consisted of 3 LED light bulbs (2,700 [warm LED]; 5,000 [cool LED 1]; and 5,000 K [cool LED 2]) and incandescent light (2,010 K [ICD], standard) from day zero to 56 d of age. A total of 960 Ross×Ross 708 day-old chicks were equally and randomly distributed into 16 environmentally controlled rooms at 50% RH (30 males and 30 females/room). Thus, each of the 4 treatments was represented by 4 rooms (4 replicates) per trial. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. All birds were fed the same diet. Ocular specimens were collected on d 42 for development and histopathologic examination. Blood samples were collected on d 21, 28, 42, and 56 to determine plasma corticosterone. On d 56, twenty birds from each room (10 males and 10 females) were processed to determine weights and yields. The BW and BW gain (BWG), live weight, and carcass weights of birds reared under cool LED 1 were different in comparison to birds reared under ICD (P<0.05). However, feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality were not affected by treatments. The treatments did not affect fat, breast and tender weights, and yields. In addition, ocular development indices and plasma corticosterone concentrations were not affected by treatments, suggesting the LED light bulbs we evaluated did not compromise the welfare of the birds. It was concluded that cool LED 1 may be a better potential replacement light source in comparison to ICD on performance, but it may be equal when compared to other LED light sources examined in this study.
authors: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, 39762-5367 hammed.olanrewaju@ars.usda.gov.
authors: H A
authors: HA
authors: Olanrewaju
authors: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, 39762-5367.
authors: J L
authors: JL
authors: Purswell
authors: College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Wise Center, Mississippi State, 39762.
authors: W R
authors: WR
authors: Maslin
authors: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, 39762-5367.
authors: S D
authors: SD
authors: Collier
authors: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Poultry Research Unit, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, 39762-5367.
authors: S L
authors: SL
authors: Branton
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D003116:Color; D005123:Eye / Q000254:growth & development; D005260:Female; D008027:Light; D008029:Lighting; D008297:Male; D011897:Random Allocation; D015430:Weight Gain
keywords: broilers; carcass yield; growth performance; light-emitting diode; stress