title: Osteogenic performance of donor-matched human adipose and bone marrow mesenchymal cells under dynamic culture.
abstract: Adipose-derived mesenchymal cells (ACs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells (BMCs) have been widely used for bone regeneration and can be seeded on a variety of rigid scaffolds. However, to date, a direct comparison of mesenchymal cells (MC) harvested from different tissues from the same donor and cultured in identical osteogenic conditions has not been investigated. Indeed, it is unclear whether marrow-derived or fat-derived MC possess intrinsic differences in bone-forming capabilities, since within-patient comparisons have not been previously done. This study aims at comparing ACs and BMCs from three donors ranging in age from neonatal to adult. Matched cells from each donor were studied in three distinct bioreactor settings, to determine the best method to create a viable osseous engineered construct. Human ACs and BMCs were isolated from each donor, cultured, and seeded on decellularized porcine bone (DCB) constructs. The constructs were then subjected to either static or dynamic (stirring or perfusion) bioreactor culture conditions for 7-21 days. Afterward, the constructs were analyzed for cell adhesion and distribution and osteogenic differentiation. ACs demonstrated higher seeding efficiency than BMCs. However, static and dynamic culture significantly increased BMCs proliferation more than ACs. In all conditions, BMCs demonstrated stronger osteogenic activity as compared with ACs, through higher alkaline phosphatase activity and gene expression for various bony markers. Conversely, ACs expressed more collagen I, which is a nonspecific matrix molecule in most connective tissues. Overall, dynamic bioreactor culture conditions enhanced osteogenic gene expression in both ACs and BMCs. Scaffolds seeded with BMCs in dynamic stirring culture conditions exhibit the greatest osteogenic proliferation and function in vitro, proving that marrow-derived MC have superior bone-forming potential as compared with adipose-derived cells.
authors: 1 Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University , New Haven, Connecticut.
authors: Wei
authors: W
authors: Wu
authors: Andrew V
authors: AV
authors: Le
authors: Julio J
authors: JJ
authors: Mendez
authors: Julie
authors: J
authors: Chang
authors: Laura E
authors: LE
authors: Niklason
authors: Derek M
authors: DM
authors: Steinbacher
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000166:cytology*; D000328:Adult; D000469:Alkaline Phosphatase / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D019149:Bioreactors; D001854:Bone Marrow Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000166:cytology; D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D002448:Cell Adhesion; D018929:Cell Culture Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D002648:Child; D004247:DNA / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D005455:Fluorescent Antibody Technique; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D059630:Mesenchymal Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D015675:Osteocalcin / Q000378:metabolism; D010012:Osteogenesis / Q000235:genetics; D034421:Sus scrofa; D014019:Tissue Donors
chemical_list: D015675:Osteocalcin; D004247:DNA; D000469:Alkaline Phosphatase; D002118:Calcium