title: Qualitative research ethics on the spot: Not only on the desktop.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The increase in medical ethical regulations and bureaucracy handled by institutional review boards and healthcare institutions puts the researchers using qualitative methods in a challenging position.
  
  
  METHODS
  Based on three different cases from three different research studies, the article explores and discusses research ethical dilemmas.
  First, and especially, the article addresses the challenges for gatekeepers who influence the informant's decisions to participate in research. Second, the article addresses the challenges in following research ethical guidelines related to informed consent and doing no harm. Third, the article argues for the importance of having research ethical guidelines and review boards to question and discuss the possible ethical dilemmas that occur in qualitative research.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Research ethics must be understood in qualitative research as relational, situational, and emerging. That is, that focus on ethical issues and dilemmas has to be paid attention on the spot and not only at the desktop.
authors: Stord/Haugesund University College, Norway christine.oye@hsh.no.
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Øye
authors: University College Sealand, Denmark.
authors: Nelli Øvre
authors: NØ
authors: Sørensen
authors: Lund University, Sweden.
authors: Stinne
authors: S
authors: Glasdam
mesh_terms: D028744:Ethics Committees, Research / Q000592:standards*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D018579:Patient Selection / Q000941:ethics; D036301:Qualitative Research
keywords: Do no harm; gatekeeper; informed consent; qualitative research; relational and situational ethics; research ethics