title: Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable: a philosophical analysis of Making Fair Choices.
abstract: In this article we consider the conclusions and recommendations of the World Health Organisation's report Making Fair Choices from a philosophical perspective. In particular we reflect on the report's return to substantive claims about justice in the allocation of health care resources and its argument that certain trade-offs are 'generally unacceptable'.
authors: 1Political Science,University College London,UK.
authors: Benedict E
authors: BE
authors: Rumbold
authors: 2Department of Philosophy,Centre for Philosophy,Justice and Health,UCL,UK.
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Wilson
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D012935:Social Justice; D014944:World Health Organization