title: Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: a précis.
abstract: We outline key conclusions of the World Health Organisation's report 'Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage (UHC)'. The Report argues that three principles should inform choices on the path to UHC: I. Coverage should be based on need, with extra weight given to the needs of the worse off; II. One aim should be to generate the greatest total improvement in health; III. Contributions should be based on ability to pay and not need. We describe how these principles determine which trade-offs are (un)acceptable. We also discuss which institutions contribute to fair and accountable choices.
authors: 1Philosophy,Logic,and Scientific Method,London School of Economics,UK.
authors: Alex
authors: A
authors: Voorhoeve
authors: 2Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care,University of Bergen,Norway.
authors: Trygve
authors: T
authors: Ottersen
authors: 2Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care,University of Bergen,Norway.
authors: Ole F
authors: OF
authors: Norheim
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D020380:Needs Assessment; D019472:Universal Health Insurance / Q000191:economics*; D014944:World Health Organization