title: Introducing conjoint analysis method into delayed lotteries studies: its validity and time stability are higher than in adjusting.
abstract: The delayed lotteries are much more common in everyday life than are pure lotteries. Usually, we need to wait to find out the outcome of the risky decision (e.g., investing in a stock market, engaging in a relationship). However, most research has studied the time discounting and probability discounting in isolation using the methodologies designed specifically to track changes in one parameter. Most commonly used method is adjusting, but its reported validity and time stability in research on discounting are suboptimal. The goal of this study was to introduce the novel method for analyzing delayed lotteries-conjoint analysis-which hypothetically is more suitable for analyzing individual preferences in this area. A set of two studies compared the conjoint analysis with adjusting. The results suggest that individual parameters of discounting strength estimated with conjoint have higher predictive value (Study 1 and 2), and they are more stable over time (Study 2) compared to adjusting. We discuss these findings, despite the exploratory character of reported studies, by suggesting that future research on delayed lotteries should be cross-validated using both methods.
authors: Economic Psychology Department, Centre for Economic Psychology and Decision Sciences, Kozminski University Warsaw, Poland.
authors: Michał
authors: M
authors: Białek
authors: Economic Psychology Department, Centre for Economic Psychology and Decision Sciences, Kozminski University Warsaw, Poland.
authors: Łukasz
authors: Ł
authors: Markiewicz
authors: Economic Psychology Department, Centre for Economic Psychology and Decision Sciences, Kozminski University Warsaw, Poland.
authors: Przemysław
authors: P
authors: Sawicki
keywords: adjusting; conjoint; delay discounting; methodology; probability discounting