title: What if you went to the police and accused your uncle of abuse? Misunderstandings concerning the benefits of memory distortion: A commentary on Fernández (2015).
abstract: In a recent paper, Fernández (2015) argues that memory distortion can have beneficial outcomes. Although we agree with this, we find his reasoning and examples flawed to such degree that they will lead to misunderstandings rather than clarification in the field of memory (distortion). In his paper, Fernández uses the terms belief and memory incorrectly, creating a conceptual blur. Also, Fernández tries to make the case that under certain circumstances, false memories of abuse are beneficial. We argue against this idea as the reasoning behind this claim is based on controversial assumptions such as repression. Although it is true that memory distortions can be beneficial, the examples sketched by Fernández are not in line with recent documentation in this area.
authors: Maastricht University, The Netherlands; City University London, UK. Electronic address: Henry.Otgaar@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
authors: Henry
authors: H
authors: Otgaar
authors: Maastricht University, The Netherlands; City University London, UK.
authors: Mark L
authors: ML
authors: Howe
authors: Maastricht University, The Netherlands; University of Portsmouth, UK.
authors: Andrew
authors: A
authors: Clark
authors: Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
authors: Jianqin
authors: J
authors: Wang
authors: Maastricht University, The Netherlands.
authors: Harald
authors: H
authors: Merckelbach
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D000223:Adaptation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology
keywords: Adaptive memory; Belief; False memory; Memory distortion; Nonbelieved memories; Recollection