title: How adequate are the current methods of lead extraction? A review of the efficiency and safety of transvenous lead extraction methods.
abstract: Currently several extraction tools are available in order to allow safe and successful transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of pacemaker and ICD leads; however, no directives exist to guide physicians in their choice of extraction tools and approaches. To aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the success and complication rates of different extraction methods and tools available. A comprehensive search of all published literature was conducted in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Central. Included papers were original articles describing a specific method of TLE and the corresponding success rates of at least 50 patients. Fifty-three studies were included; the majority (56%) utilized 2 (1-4) different venous extraction approaches (subclavian and femoral), the median number of extraction tools used was 3 (1-6). A stepwise approach was utilized in the majority of the studies, starting with simple traction which resulted in successful TLE in 7-85% of the leads. When applicable the procedure was continued with non-powered tools resulting in a successful extraction of 34-87% leads. Subsequently, powered tools were applied whereby success rates further increased to 74-100%. The final step in TLE was usually utilized by femoral snare leading to an overall TLE success rate of 96-100%. The median procedure-related mortality and major complication described were, respectively, 0% (0-3%) and 1% (0-7%) per patient. In conclusion, a stepwise extraction approach can result in a clinical successful TLE in up to 100% of the leads with a relatively low risk of procedure-related mortality and complications.
authors: Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors: Maurits S
authors: MS
authors: Buiten
authors: Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors: Aafke C
authors: AC
authors: van der Heijden
authors: Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
authors: Martin J
authors: MJ
authors: Schalij
authors: Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands l.van_erven@lumc.nl.
authors: Lieselot
authors: L
authors: van Erven
mesh_terms: D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Q000009:adverse effects; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable; D020878:Device Removal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Cardiac implantable devices; Extraction tools; Transvenous lead extractions