title: Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 3: Evaluating interprofessional education.
abstract: We have witnessed an ongoing increase in the publication of evaluation work aimed at measuring the processes and outcomes related to a range of interprofessional education (IPE) activities and initiatives. Systematic reviews of IPE have, however, suggested that while the quality of evaluation studies is improving, there continues to be a number of empirical weaknesses with this work. In an effort to enhance the quality of IPE evaluation studies, this guide provides a series of ideas and suggestions about how to undertake a robust evaluation of an IPE event. The guide presents a series of key lessons for colleagues to help them undertake a good quality IPE evaluation, covering a range of methodological, practical and ethical issues. These include: the formation of evaluation questions, use of evaluation models and theoretical perspectives, advice about the selection of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods evaluation designs, managing evaluation resources, and ideas about disseminating evaluation results to the broader IPE community. It is anticipated that this guide will assist IPE colleagues in undertaking high-quality evaluation in order to provide valuable evidence for different stakeholders, and also help inform the scholarly knowledge for the interprofessional field.
authors: Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University & St George's University of London , London , UK .
authors: Scott
authors: S
authors: Reeves
authors: Sylvain
authors: S
authors: Boet
authors: Brenda
authors: B
authors: Zierler
authors: Simon
authors: S
authors: Kitto
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007858:Learning; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D013663:Teaching
keywords: Evaluation; interprofessional education; interprofessional learning; mixed methods; qualitative methods; quantitative methods