title: DSM-5, psychiatric epidemiology and the false positives problem.
abstract: The revision effort leading to the publication of the fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was flawed in process, goals and outcome. The revision process suffered from lack of an adequate public record of the rationale for changes, thus shortchanging future scholarship. The goals, such as dimensionalising diagnosis, incorporating biomarkers and separating impairment from diagnosis, were ill-considered and mostly abandoned. However, DSM-5's greatest problem, and the target of the most vigorous and sustained criticism, was its failure to take seriously the false positives problem. By expanding diagnosis beyond plausible boundaries in ways inconsistent with DSM-5's own definition of disorder, DSM-5 threatened the validity of psychiatric research, including especially psychiatric epidemiology. I present four examples: increasing the symptom options while decreasing the diagnostic threshold for substance use disorder, elimination of the bereavement exclusion from major depression, allowing verbal arguments as evidence of intermittent explosive disorder and expanding attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to adults before addressing its manifest false positives problems.
authors: School of Social Work and Department of Psychiatry,New York University,New York,New York,USA.
authors: J C
authors: JC
authors: Wakefield
keywords: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; DSM 5; bereavement exclusion; depression; diagnosis and classification; harmful dysfunction; intermittent explosive disorder; major depression; mental disorder; psychiatric diagnosis; substance use disorder