title: Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
abstract: While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for research, many research questions cannot be ethically and practically answered using an RCT. Comparative effectiveness research (CER) techniques are often better suited than RCTs to address the effects of an intervention under routine care conditions, an outcome otherwise known as effectiveness. CER research techniques covered in this section include: effectiveness-oriented experimental studies such as pragmatic trials and cluster randomized trials, treatment response heterogeneity, observational and database studies including adjustment techniques such as sensitivity analysis and propensity score analysis, systematic reviews and meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. Each section describes the technique and covers the strengths and weaknesses of the approach.
authors: Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
authors: Christine V
authors: CV
authors: Kinnier
authors: Jeanette W
authors: JW
authors: Chung
authors: Karl Y
authors: KY
authors: Bilimoria
mesh_terms: D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research / Q000379:methods*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D016208:Databases, Factual; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D064792:Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic