title: Segmental and global lordosis changes with two-level axial lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Loss of lumbar lordosis has been reported after lumbar interbody fusion surgery and may portend poor clinical and radiographic outcome. The objective of this research was to measure changes in segmental and global lumbar lordosis in patients treated with presacral axial L4-S1 interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation and to determine if these changes influenced patient outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a retrospective, multi-center review of prospectively collected data in 58 consecutive patients with disabling lumbar pain and radiculopathy unresponsive to nonsurgical treatment who underwent L4-S1 interbody fusion with the AxiaLIF two-level system (Baxano Surgical, Raleigh NC). Main outcomes included back pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Odom's outcome criteria, and fusion status using flexion and extension radiographs and computed tomography scans. Segmental (L4-S1) and global (L1-S1) lumbar lordosis measurements were made using standing lateral radiographs. All patients were followed for at least 24 months (mean: 29 months, range 24-56 months).
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was no bowel injury, vascular injury, deep infection, neurologic complication or implant failure. Mean back pain severity improved from 7.8±1.7 at baseline to 3.3±2.6 at 2 years (p < 0.001). Mean ODI scores improved from 60±15% at baseline to 34±27% at 2 years (p < 0.001). At final follow-up, 83% of patients were rated as good or excellent using Odom's criteria. Interbody fusion was observed in 111 (96%) of 116 treated interspaces. Maintenance of lordosis, defined as a change in Cobb angle ≤ 5°, was identified in 84% of patients at L4-S1 and 81% of patients at L1-S1. Patients with loss or gain in segmental or global lordosis experienced similar 2-year outcomes versus those with less than a 5° change.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Two-level axial interbody fusion supplemented with posterior fixation does not alter segmental or global lordosis in most patients. Patients with postoperative change in lordosis greater than 5° have similarly favorable long-term clinical outcomes and fusion rates compared to patients with less than 5° lordosis change.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Hospital, Gulfport, MS.
authors.forename: Miguel A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Melgar
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
authors.forename: William D
authors.initials: WD
authors.lastname: Tobler
authors.affiliation: Professional Radiology, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Ernst
authors.affiliation: Advanced Spine and Pain, Arlington, VA.
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Raley
authors.affiliation: Spine Trauma, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Spine Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
authors.forename: Neel
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Anand
authors.affiliation: Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, NC.
authors.forename: Larry E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.affiliation: Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Wilmington, NC.
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Nasca
keywords: AxiaLIF; Fusion; Interbody; Lumbar; Presacral; axial; lordosis