title: Contrasting taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity responses to forest modifications: comparisons of taxa and successive plant life stages in South African scarp forest.
abstract: The degradation of natural forests to modified forests threatens subtropical and tropical biodiversity worldwide. Yet, species responses to forest modification vary considerably. Furthermore, effects of forest modification can differ, whether with respect to diversity components (taxonomic or phylogenetic) or to local (α-diversity) and regional (β-diversity) spatial scales. This real-world complexity has so far hampered our understanding of subtropical and tropical biodiversity patterns in human-modified forest landscapes. In a subtropical South African forest landscape, we studied the responses of three successive plant life stages (adult trees, saplings, seedlings) and of birds to five different types of forest modification distinguished by the degree of within-forest disturbance and forest loss. Responses of the two taxa differed markedly. Thus, the taxonomic α-diversity of birds was negatively correlated with the diversity of all plant life stages and, contrary to plant diversity, increased with forest disturbance. Conversely, forest disturbance reduced the phylogenetic α-diversity of all plant life stages but not that of birds. Forest loss neither affected taxonomic nor phylogenetic diversity of any taxon. On the regional scale, taxonomic but not phylogenetic β-diversity of both taxa was well predicted by variation in forest disturbance and forest loss. In contrast to adult trees, the phylogenetic diversity of saplings and seedlings showed signs of contemporary environmental filtering. In conclusion, forest modification in this subtropical landscape strongly shaped both local and regional biodiversity but with contrasting outcomes. Phylogenetic diversity of plants may be more threatened than that of mobile species such as birds. The reduced phylogenetic diversity of saplings and seedlings suggests losses in biodiversity that are not visible in adult trees, potentially indicating time-lags and contemporary shifts in forest regeneration. The different responses of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity to forest modifications imply that biodiversity conservation in this subtropical landscape requires the preservation of natural and modified forests.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology-Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Ingo
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Grass
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology-Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Brandl
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Botzat
authors.affiliation: Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) and Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt (Main), Germany.
authors.forename: Eike Lena
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Neuschulz
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology-Conservation Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Nina
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Farwig
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D018533:Biomass; D001717:Birds / Q000145:classification; D065928:Forests; D010802:Phylogeny; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification; D013019:South Africa