title: Does a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention affect disability, pain behavior, pain, and return to work the first year after lumbar spinal fusion surgery?
abstract: METHODS
  A randomized clinical trial including 90 patients.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the effect of a preoperative cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBT) for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) surgery.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Few published studies have looked at the potential of rehabilitation to improve outcomes after LSF. Rehabilitation programs using CBT are recommended. Furthermore, initiating interventions preoperatively seems beneficial, but only limited data exist in the field of spine surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis undergoing LSF were randomized to usual care (control group) or preoperative CBT and usual care (CBT group). Primary outcome was change in Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were catastrophizing, fear avoidance belief, work status, and back and leg pain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At 1-year follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between the CBT group and the control group in Oswestry Disability Index score (P = 0.082). However, the CBT group had achieved a significant reduction of -15 points (-26; -4) already at 3 months (between group difference P = 0.003), and this reduction was maintained throughout the year. There were no differences between groups at 1-year follow-up with regard to any of the secondary outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Participating in a preoperative CBT intervention in addition to usual care did not produce better outcomes at 1-year follow-up for patients undergoing LSF. Although the reduction in disability was achieved much faster in the CBT group, resulting in a significant difference between groups already 3 months after surgery, it did not translate into a faster return to work. Our findings support the need for further research into the use of targeted rehabilitation interventions among patients with elevated levels of catastrophizing and fear avoidance beliefs.
  
  
  METHODS
  2.
authors.affiliation: *Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark †Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark ‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; and §Elective Surgery Centre, Regional Hospital Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark.
authors.forename: Nanna
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Rolving
authors.forename: Claus Vinther
authors.initials: CV
authors.lastname: Nielsen
authors.forename: Finn Bjarke
authors.initials: FB
authors.lastname: Christensen
authors.forename: Randi
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Holm
authors.forename: Cody Eric
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Bünger
authors.forename: Lisa Gregersen
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Oestergaard
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D057234:Preoperative Period; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000534:rehabilitation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*