title: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence in Treating Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury.
abstract: The successful clinical translation of therapeutic hypothermia offers the tantalizing possibility that further improvements in outcomes may be possible by combining cooling with other neuroprotective drugs. The challenge now is to select from a daunting range of potential treatments. The patient's best interest must be central to ethical decision making at all times. However, the beneficence or nonmaleficence of potential therapies is seldom clear for any individual patient at the time of testing new therapies. Clinical randomized controlled trials are generally acknowledged by the scientific community as the 'gold standard' for evaluating interventions in health care. Therefore, ethical trial design is of the utmost importance. This paper explores contrasting ethical perspectives on how to select new interventions to treat neonatal encephalopathy after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia.
authors.affiliation: Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, WS012 Women's Hospital, Winnipeg, Man., Canada.
authors.forename: Mohamed
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tagin
authors.forename: Changlian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zhu
authors.forename: Alistair J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Gunn
mesh_terms: D026686:Beneficence; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D020925:Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007232:Infant, Newborn, Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D009359:Neonatology / Q000941:ethics*