title: A philosophical debate on the morality of doping is interesting but beyond the scope of our meta-analysis.
authors.affiliation: Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine Research Group, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia, Nikos.Ntoumanis@curtin.edu.au.
authors.forename: Nikos
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ntoumanis
authors.forename: Johan Y Y
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Ng
authors.forename: Vassilis
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Barkoukis
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Backhouse
mesh_terms: D056352:Athletes / Q000523:psychology*; D004300:Doping in Sports / Q000523:psychology*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D058573:Performance-Enhancing Substances / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D058573:Performance-Enhancing Substances