title: Metaphors are physical and abstract: ERPs to metaphorically modified nouns resemble ERPs to abstract language.
abstract: Metaphorical expressions very often involve words referring to physical entities and experiences. Yet, figures of speech such as metaphors are not intended to be understood literally, word-by-word. We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to determine whether metaphorical expressions are processed more like physical or more like abstract expressions. To this end, novel adjective-noun word pairs were presented visually in three conditions: (1) Physical, easy to experience with the senses (e.g., "printed schedule"); (2) Abstract, difficult to experience with the senses (e.g., "conditional schedule"); and (3) novel Metaphorical, expressions with a physical adjective, but a figurative meaning (e.g., "thin schedule"). We replicated the N400 lexical concreteness effect for concrete vs. abstract adjectives. In order to increase the sensitivity of the concreteness manipulation on the expressions, we divided each condition into high and low groups according to rated concreteness. Mirroring the adjective result, we observed a N400 concreteness effect at the noun for physical expressions with high concreteness ratings vs. abstract expressions with low concreteness ratings, even though the nouns per se did not differ in lexical concreteness. Paradoxically, the N400 to nouns in the metaphorical expressions was indistinguishable from that to nouns in the literal abstract expressions, but only for the more concrete subgroup of metaphors; the N400 to the less concrete subgroup of metaphors patterned with that to nouns in the literal concrete expressions. In sum, we not only find evidence for conceptual concreteness separable from lexical concreteness but also that the processing of metaphorical expressions is not driven strictly by either lexical or conceptual concreteness.
authors.affiliation: Kutas Cognitive Electrophysiology Lab, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA ; Cognitive Development Center, Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University Budapest, Hungary ; Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes Paris, France.
authors.forename: Bálint
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Forgács
authors.affiliation: Kutas Cognitive Electrophysiology Lab, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Megan D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Bardolph
authors.affiliation: Kutas Cognitive Electrophysiology Lab, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Ben D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Amsel
authors.affiliation: Kutas Cognitive Electrophysiology Lab, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Katherine A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: DeLong
authors.affiliation: Kutas Cognitive Electrophysiology Lab, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kutas
keywords: ERPs; N400; abstract-concrete; concreteness effect; figurative language; metaphor; novel expressions