Selecting an appropriate surgical treatment instead of carotid artery stenting alone according to the patient's risk factors contributes to reduced perioperative complications in patients with internal carotid stenosis: a single institutional retrospective analysis.
This retrospective study was aimed to compare the perioperative complications for internal carotid artery stenosis (ICS) in a Japanese single institute between the use of carotid artery stenting (CAS) alone or the use of an appropriate individualized treatment method allowing either carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or CAS based on patient risk factors. Based on the policy at our hospital, only CAS was performed on patients (n = 33) between January 2005 and November 2009. From December 2009 to December 2012, either CEA or CAS (tailored treatment) was selected for patients (n = 61) based on individual patient risk factors. CEA was considered the first-line treatment in all cases. In high-risk CEA cases, CAS was performed instead (n = 11), whereas in low-risk CEA cases, CEA was performed (n = 19). Further, in moderate-risk CEA cases based on own criteria, CAS was considered first, whereas for high-risk CAS cases, CEA was performed (n = 17). For low-risk CAS cases, CAS was performed (n = 9). Perioperative clinical complications (any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death within 30 days) were compared between both periods. Significantly reduced perioperative complications were observed during the tailored period (4/61 sites, 6.6%) as compared with the CAS period (8/33 sites, 24.2%) [Fisher's exact test p = 0.022; odds ratio, 4.56 (CAS/tailored); 95% confidence interval, 1.26-16.5]. Selecting an appropriate individualized treatment method according to patient risk factors, as opposed to adhering to a single treatment approach such as CAS, may contribute to improved overall outcomes in patients with ICS.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine.
Kimitoshi
K
Sato
Sachio
S
Suzuki
Masaru
M
Yamada
Hidehiro
H
Oka
Akira
A
Kurata
Hirotsugu
H
Okamoto
Kiyotaka
K
Fujii
Toshihiro
T
Kumabe
D000368:Aged; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D002423:Cause of Death; D002543:Cerebral Hemorrhage / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D002544:Cerebral Infarction / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D016894:Endarterectomy, Carotid; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D002546:Ischemic Attack, Transient / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D007564:Japan; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control*; D057285:Precision Medicine; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D015607:Stents; D020521:Stroke / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control