Linking perception and action by structure or process? Toward an integrative perspective.
Over the past decades cognitive neuroscience's renewed interest in action has intensified the search of principles explaining how the cognitive system links perception to action and vice versa. To date, at least two seemingly alternative approaches can be distinguished. Perception and action might be linked either by common representational structures, as assumed by the ideomotor approach, or by common attentional processes, as assumed by the attention approach. This article first reviews the evidence from different paradigms supporting each approach. It becomes clear that most studies selectively focus either on actions directed at goals outside the actors' perceptual range (supporting the ideomotor approach) or on actions directed at targets within the actors' perceptual range (supporting the attention approach). In a second step, I will try to reconcile both approaches by reviewing recent eye movement studies that abolish the classical combination of approach and goals under study. Demonstrating that both approaches cover target- as well as goal-directed actions, it is proposed that operations addressed in both conceptual frameworks interact with each other.
Department of Psychology and Cluster of Excellence, "Cognitive Interaction Technology", Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. Electronic address: aherwig@uni-bielefeld.de.
Arvid
A
Herwig
D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*
Anticipation; Attention; Eye movements; Ideomotor theory; Prediction; Priority map