Randomized study to compare nasojejunal with nasogastric nutrition in critically ill patients without prior evidence of altered gastric emptying.
OBJECTIVE
Studies comparing jejunal and gastric nutrition show inconsistent results regarding pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pneumonia comparing gastric with jejunal nutrition. Secondarily, we evaluated 28(th) day Intensive Care Unit (ICU) mortality rate and other complications related to enteral feeding.


METHODS
Age >18 years; need for enteral nutrition without contraindication for placement of an enteral tube, duration of ICU stay > than 48 h.


METHODS
Patients were randomly assigned to receive enteral feed via a gastric or jejunal tube. Jejunal tubes were inserted at bedside and placement was confirmed radiographically.


RESULTS
A total of 115 patients were enrolled, with 61 patients into the gastric tube group and 54 patients into the jejunal group tube. Baseline characteristics were similar. There was no difference in pneumonia or ICU mortality rates, ICU length of stay and ventilator days. Complications rates were similar.


CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that the enteral nutrition through a jejunal tube does not reduce the rate of pneumonia in comparison to a gastric tube. In addition, we did not observe differences in rates of gastrointestinal complications or ICU mortality. The routine placement of a jejunal tube in critically ill-patients cannot be recommended.
Central Intensive Care Unit, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil ; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gilberto
G
Friedman
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cecilia Lopes
CL
Flávia Couto
Pompeia Hospital, Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
Maicon
M
Becker
Critical illness; Intensive care units; enteral nutrition; nasojejunal; pneumonia; randomized controlled trial