Arsenic sorption onto titanium dioxide, granular ferric hydroxide and activated alumina: batch and dynamic studies.
The aim of this work was to evaluate and compare the efficiencies of three different adsorbents for arsenic (As) removal from water: titanium dioxide (TiO2), granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) and activated alumina (AA). Equilibrium experiments for dissolved arsenite and arsenate were carried out through batch tests. Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models were adopted and their parameters were estimated by non-linear regressions. In addition, dynamic experiments were performed in mini fixed bed columns and breakthrough curves were obtained for each combination of sorbate/adsorbent. Experimental results obtained by column assays were compared with predictions of well-known breakthrough models (Bohart-Adams and Clark). Results indicate that As(V) is more easily adsorbed than As(III) for AA and GFH, while TiO2 has a similar behavior for both species. The titanium-based material is the most efficient adsorbent to carry out the process, followed by the GFH.
a INTEC (UNL-CONICET) , Santa Fe , Argentina.
Maia R
MR
Lescano
Claudio
C
Passalía
Cristina S
CS
Zalazar
Rodolfo J
RJ
Brandi
D000327:Adsorption; D000537:Aluminum Oxide / Q000737:chemistry*; D001151:Arsenic / Q000737:chemistry*; D005290:Ferric Compounds / Q000737:chemistry*; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry*; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000737:chemistry*; D018508:Water Purification / Q000379:methods*
D005290:Ferric Compounds; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; C009495:titanium dioxide; C021024:ferric hydroxide; D014025:Titanium; D000537:Aluminum Oxide; D001151:Arsenic
Adsorption columns; adsorption isotherms; arsenic removal; breakthrough curves