The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
Recently, there have been increasing numbers of activities labeled as either quality improvement (QI) or comparative effectiveness research (CER), both of which are designed to learn what works and what does not in routine clinical care settings. These activities can create confusion for researchers, Institutional Review Board members, and other stakeholders as they try to determine which activities or components of activities constitute clinical practices and which constitute clinical research requiring ethical oversight and informed consent. We conducted a series of semi-structured focus groups with QI and CER professionals to understand their experiences and views of the ethical and regulatory challenges that exist as well as the formal or informal practices and criteria they and their institutions use to address these issues. We found that most participants have experienced challenges related to the ethical oversight of QI and CER activities, and many believe that current regulatory criteria for distinguishing clinical practice from clinical research requiring ethical oversight are confusing. Instead, many participants described other criteria that they believe are more ethically appropriate. Many also described developing formal or informal practices at their institutions to navigate which activities require ethical oversight. However, these local solutions do not completely resolve the issues caused by the blurring of clinical practice and clinical research, raising the question of whether more foundational regulatory changes are needed.
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Danielle
D
Whicher
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA nkass@jhu.edu.
Nancy
N
Kass
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yashar
Y
Saghai
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ruth
R
Faden
Center for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sean
S
Tunis
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter
P
Pronovost
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D057186:Comparative Effectiveness Research / Q000941:ethics*; D003219:Confidentiality; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000941:ethics*; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D032984:Ethics, Research; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000941:ethics*; D012108:Research Personnel
IRB review; bioethics; focus groups; informed consent; qualitative methods; research ethics committee