Heterogeneity in European research integrity guidance: relying on values or norms?
Similar forms of misconduct are perceived differently throughout Europe. There are no extensive surveys on the guidance on research integrity in the different countries of Europe. Therefore, we performed a systematic content analysis of (biomedical) research integrity guidance documents from all the countries of the European Economic Area. We show that there is strong heterogeneity concerning research integrity guidance on crucial aspects, for example, the defining of research misconduct, at both an international and a national level. We also sought to explain why the guidance documents differ by distinguishing the approaches that underlie them. We distinguished a value-based and a norm-based approach, as well as different perspectives on trust. The current confusing situation concerning research integrity guidance hampers international research and possibly wastes research funds. We risk talking past each other, if we do not take the distinction between these underlying approaches into account.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Simon
S
Godecharle
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Benoit
B
Nemery
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium kris.dierickx@med.kuleuven.be.
Kris
K
Dierickx
D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D005060:Europe; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D035502:Trust
authorship; conflicts of interest; guidance; peer review; prevention; publication ethics; questionable research; research integrity; research misconduct; science policy