Data inconsistencies from states with unconventional oil and gas activity.
The quality and availability of unconventional oil and gas (O&G) data in the United States have never been compared methodically state-to-state. By conducting such an assessment, this study seeks to better understand private and publicly sourced data variability and to identify data availability gaps. We developed an exploratory data-grading tool - Data Accessibility and Usability Index (DAUI) - to guide the review of O&G data quality. Between July and October 2013, we requested, collected, and assessed 5 categories of unconventional O&G data (wells drilled, violations, production, waste, and Class II disposal wells) from 10 states with active drilling activity. We based our assessment on eight data quality parameters (accessibility, usability, point location, completeness, metadata, agency responsiveness, accuracy, and cost). Using the DAUI, two authors graded the 10 states and then averaged their scores. The average score received across all states, data categories, and parameters was 67.1 out of 100, largely insufficient for proper data transparency. By state, Pennsylvania received the highest average ( = 93.5) and ranked first in all but one data category. The lowest scoring state was Texas ( = 44) largely due to its policy of charging for certain data. This article discusses the various reasons for scores received, as well as methodological limitations of the assessment metrics. We argue that the significant variability of unconventional O&G data-and its availability to the public-is a barrier to regulatory and industry transparency. The lack of transparency also impacts public education and broader participation in industry governance. This study supports the need to develop a set of data best management practices (BMPs) for state regulatory agencies and the O&G industry, and suggests potential BMPs for this purpose.
a FracTracker Alliance , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA.
Samantha
S
Malone
Matthew
M
Kelso
Ted
T
Auch
Karen
K
Edelstein
Kyle
K
Ferrar
Kirk
K
Jalbert
D022126:Access to Information / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003256:Community Participation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003625:Data Collection / Q000592:standards*; D004782:Environmental Health / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D019652:Extraction and Processing Industry / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D059206:Natural Gas; D061329:Oil and Gas Fields; D010414:Pennsylvania; D010578:Petroleum; D013781:Texas; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States
D059206:Natural Gas; D010578:Petroleum
Data transparency; environmental governance; oil and gas extraction; public participation; unconventional drilling