Comparative analysis of metagenomes from three methanogenic hydrocarbon-degrading enrichment cultures with 41 environmental samples.
Methanogenic hydrocarbon metabolism is a key process in subsurface oil reservoirs and hydrocarbon-contaminated environments and thus warrants greater understanding to improve current technologies for fossil fuel extraction and bioremediation. In this study, three hydrocarbon-degrading methanogenic cultures established from two geographically distinct environments and incubated with different hydrocarbon substrates (added as single hydrocarbons or as mixtures) were subjected to metagenomic and 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing to test whether these differences affect the genetic potential and composition of the communities. Enrichment of different putative hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in each culture appeared to be substrate dependent, though all cultures contained both acetate- and H2-utilizing methanogens. Despite differing hydrocarbon substrates and inoculum sources, all three cultures harbored genes for hydrocarbon activation by fumarate addition (bssA, assA, nmsA) and carboxylation (abcA, ancA), along with those for associated downstream pathways (bbs, bcr, bam), though the cultures incubated with hydrocarbon mixtures contained a broader diversity of fumarate addition genes. A comparative metagenomic analysis of the three cultures showed that they were functionally redundant despite their enrichment backgrounds, sharing multiple features associated with syntrophic hydrocarbon conversion to methane. In addition, a comparative analysis of the culture metagenomes with those of 41 environmental samples (containing varying proportions of methanogens) showed that the three cultures were functionally most similar to each other but distinct from other environments, including hydrocarbon-impacted environments (for example, oil sands tailings ponds and oil-affected marine sediments). This study provides a basis for understanding key functions and environmental selection in methanogenic hydrocarbon-associated communities.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Boonfei
B
Tan
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
S Jane
SJ
Fowler
1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada [2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nidal
0000000344717823
N
Abu Laban
Visual Genomics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Xiaoli
X
Dong
Visual Genomics Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Christoph W
CW
Sensen
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Julia
J
Foght
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lisa M
LM
Gieg
D000416:Alberta; D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics; D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D004777:Environment; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D019605:Euryarchaeota / Q000235:genetics; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000382:microbiology*; D006838:Hydrocarbons / Q000737:chemistry*; D006859:Hydrogen / Q000737:chemistry; D054892:Metagenome; D056186:Metagenomics; D008697:Methane / Q000737:chemistry*; D061329:Oil and Gas Fields / Q000382:microbiology*; D010802:Phylogeny; D061005:Ponds; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics
D006838:Hydrocarbons; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; D006859:Hydrogen; D008697:Methane