Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.
Participants studied seven meaningful scene-regions bordered by removable boundaries (30s each). In Experiment 1 (N = 80) participants used visual or haptic exploration and then minutes later, reconstructed boundary position using the same or the alternate modality. Participants in all groups shifted boundary placement outward (boundary extension), but visual study yielded the greater error. Critically, this modality-specific difference in boundary extension transferred without cost in the cross-modal conditions, suggesting a functionally unitary scene representation. In Experiment 2 (N = 20), bimodal study led to boundary extension that did not differ from haptic exploration alone, suggesting that bimodal spatial memory was constrained by the more "conservative" haptic modality. In Experiment 3 (N = 20), as in picture studies, boundary memory was tested 30s after viewing each scene-region and as with pictures, boundary extension still occurred. Results suggest that scene representation is organized around an amodal spatial core that organizes bottom-up information from multiple modalities in combination with top-down expectations about the surrounding world.
University of Delaware, USA. Electronic address: intraub@udel.edu.
Helene
H
Intraub
University of Delaware, USA.
Frank
F
Morelli
University of Delaware, USA.
Kristin M
KM
Gagnier
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D013028:Space Perception; D055698:Touch Perception; D014796:Visual Perception
Boundary extension; Cross-modal representation; Multisensory (visual and haptic); Scene representation; Spatial memory