Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
There is increasing evidence that scientific misconduct is more common than previously thought. Strong emphasis on scientific productivity may increase the sense of publication pressure. We administered a nationwide survey to Flemish biomedical scientists on whether they had engaged in scientific misconduct and whether they had experienced publication pressure. A total of 315 scientists participated in the survey; 15% of the respondents admitted they had fabricated, falsified, plagiarized, or manipulated data in the past 3 years. Fraud was more common among younger scientists working in a university hospital. Furthermore, 72% rated publication pressure as "too high." Publication pressure was strongly and significantly associated with a composite scientific misconduct severity score.
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, The Netherlands j.tijdink@vumc.nl.
Joeri K
JK
Tijdink
EOS Magazine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Reinout
R
Verbeke
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo M
YM
Smulders
D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D001290:Attitude; D001530:Belgium; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics*; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics*; D015871:Scientific Misconduct; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016526:Workload
ethics in publishing; fraud; publication pressure; questionable research practice; scientific misconduct