title: Survey of perceptions of health care professionals in the United Kingdom toward uterine transplant.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Currently, the only 2 options that women with absolute uterine factor infertility have for managing their infertility are surragocy or adoption. These women may also benefit from a possible future third option: uterine transplant.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the opinions and views of UK health care professionals toward uterine transplant and rank issues related to uterine transplant by importance in order to make uterine transplant transparent and understandable to colleagues.
  
  
  METHODS
  Large, in-depth survey investigating health care professionals' opinions on uterine transplant.
  
  
  METHODS
  Analysis done at Imperial College London.
  
  
  METHODS
  UK transplant professionals (surgeons, nurses, operating room staff, and donor coordinators) and obstetricians and gynecologists (trainees, members, and fellows of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists).
  
  
  METHODS
  Questionnaires were given out at hospital grand rounds, trainee teaching days, and conferences (national and international).
  
  
  METHODS
  Should uterine transplant take place? Is uterine transplant achievable? What is the rank order of importance of key issues related to uterine transplant?
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study had 528 participants. With respect to overall support for uterine transplant and as a possible future therapeutic option for absolute uterine factor infertility, 93.8% (n=495) thought that uterine transplant should take place if considered appropriate medically, surgically, and ethically and 57.2% (n=302) thought it was an achievable objective. Issues related to immunology of uterine transplant and pregnancy after uterine transplant were unanimously thought of as most important. More effort is required to educate health care professionals about all aspects of uterine transplant.
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London.
authors.forename: Srdjan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Saso
authors.affiliation: Royal Free London, NHS Foundation Trust, London.
authors.forename: Alex
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Clarke
authors.affiliation: William Harvey Hospital, Ashford.
authors.forename: Timothy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Bracewell-Milnes
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London.
authors.forename: Maya
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Al-Memar
authors.affiliation: United Kingdom, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
authors.forename: Ali Hassan
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Hamed
authors.affiliation: The Lister Hospital, Chelsea, London, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Meen-Yau
authors.initials: MY
authors.lastname: Thum
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London.
authors.forename: Sadaf
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ghaem-Maghami
authors.affiliation: Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Georgia.
authors.forename: Giuseppe
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Del Priore
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London.
authors.forename: J Richard
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011247:Pregnancy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom; D014599:Uterus / Q000637:transplantation*