title: Does intermediate care improve patient outcomes or reduce costs?
abstract: ICUs are an essential but expensive part of all modern hospitals. With increasingly limited healthcare funding, methods to reduce expenditure without negatively influencing patient outcomes are, therefore, of interest. One possible solution has been the development of 'intermediate care units', which provide more intensive monitoring and patient management with higher nurse:patient ratios than the general ward but less than is offered in the ICU. However, although such units have been introduced in many hospitals, there is relatively little published, especially prospective, evidence to support the benefits of this approach on costs or patient outcomes. We review the available data and suggest that, where possible, a larger unit with combined intermediate care and intensive care beds in one location may be preferable in terms of greater flexibility and efficiency.
authors.forename: Jean-Louis
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Vincent
authors.forename: Gordon D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Rubenfeld
mesh_terms: D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000639:trends; D004469:Economics, Hospital / Q000639:trends; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000191:economics* / Q000639:trends; D016896:Treatment Outcome