title: Bioenhancements and the telos of medicine.
abstract: Staggering advances in biotechnology within the past decade have given rise to pharmacological, surgical and prosthetic techniques capable of enhancing human functioning rather than merely treating or preventing disease. Bioenhancement technologies range from nootropics capable of enhancing cognitive abilities to distraction osteogenesis, a surgical technique capable of increasing height through limb lengthening. This paper examines whether the use of bioenhancements falls inside or outside the proper boundaries of healthcare, and if so, whether clinicians have professional responsibilities to administer bioenhancements to patients. After explicating two theoretical approaches to the concept of health, one objectivist and the other constructivist, I contend that clinicians' corresponding professional responsibilities hinge on which philosophical account of health is endorsed, and illustrate how the lack of analytic clarity with respect to this concept can lead to defective positions on the place of bioenhancements in healthcare. With this conceptual framework in place, an account of health as a cluster concept that incorporates both constructivist and objectivist components is developed and defended.
authors: Harvard Medical School, 260 Longwood Avenue, TMEC 236, Boston, MA, USA. Michael_young@hms.harvard.edu.|Department of Philosophy, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Michael_young@hms.harvard.edu.
authors: Michael J
authors: MJ
authors: Young
mesh_terms: D024803:Biomedical Enhancement / Q000941:ethics*; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000941:ethics*; D024861:Genetic Enhancement / Q000941:ethics*; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D008511:Medicine; D028681:Moral Obligations; D028723:Personhood; D026712:Value of Life
keywords: Bioenhancement; Health; Nootropic; Philosophy of medicine; Professional responsibilities