title: Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.
abstract: To understand the mechanisms underlying visual motion analyses for perceptual and oculomotor responses and their similarities/differences, we analyzed eye movement responses to two-frame animations of dual-grating 3f5f stimuli while subjects performed direction discrimination tasks. The 3f5f stimulus was composed of two sinusoids with a spatial frequency ratio of 3:5 (3f and 5f), creating a pattern with fundamental frequency f. When this stimulus was shifted by 1/4 of the wavelength, the two components shifted 1/4 of their wavelengths and had opposite directions: the 5f forward and the 3f backward. By presenting the 3f5f stimulus with various interstimulus intervals (ISIs), two visual-motion-analysis mechanisms, low-level energy-based and high-level feature-based, could be effectively distinguished. This is because response direction depends on the relative contrast between the components when the energy-based mechanism operates, but not when the feature-based mechanism works. We found that when the 3f5f stimuli were presented with shorter ISIs (<100 ms), and 3f component had higher contrast, both perceptual and ocular responses were in the direction of the pattern shift, whereas the responses were reversed when the 5f had higher contrast, suggesting operation of the energy-based mechanism. On the other hand, the ocular responses were almost negligible with longer ISIs (>100 ms), whereas perceived directions were biased toward the direction of pattern shift. These results suggest that the energy-based mechanism is dominant in oculomotor responses throughout ISIs; however, there is a transition from energy-based to feature-tracking mechanisms when we perceive visual motion.
authors: Department of Integrative Brain Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
authors: Shizuka
authors: S
authors: Nohara
authors: Department of Integrative Brain Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and.
authors: Kenji
authors: K
authors: Kawano
authors: Department of Integrative Brain Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and kmiura@brain.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
authors: Kenichiro
authors: K
authors: Miura
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009038:Motion; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: eye movement; illusion; interstimulus interval; perception; visual motion analysis