title: The cost of standing strong for replacement.
abstract: The testimonies of these individuals largely speak for themselves. The responses point to the importance of specific institutions or research groups that focus on the development and use of alternatives, and these should, of course, be better supported. Those who find themselves outside such institutions or teams, are more likely to feel stranded and isolated. Then again, Liz did have the support of a research group dedicated to replacement, but she has still had a significant struggle to find funding. The interviews with some of these particular young researchers indeed pointed toward a tangible ‘cost’ in terms of having to steer their career on the often difficult path toward the use of non-animal based methods.
authors: Ethical Consumer Research Association, Manchester, UK.
authors: Katy
authors: K
authors: Brown
mesh_terms: D000826:Animal Testing Alternatives / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D005060:Europe; D006801:Humans; D013334:Students; D014481:United States