title: Growing better brains? Pregnancy and neuroscience discourses in English social and welfare policies.
abstract: In recent years, English welfare and health policy has started to include pregnancy within the foundation stage of child development. The foetus is also increasingly designated as 'at risk' from pregnant women. In this article, we draw on an analysis of a purposive sample of English social and welfare policies and closely related advocacy documents to trace the emergence of neuroscientific claims-making in relation to the family. In this article, we show that a specific deterministic understanding of the developing brain that only has a loose relationship with current scientific evidence is an important component in these changes. We examine the ways in which pregnancy is situated in these debates. In these debates, maternal stress is identified as a risk to the foetus; however, the selective concern with women living in disadvantage undermines biological claims. The policy claim of neurological 'critical windows' also seems to be influenced by social concerns. Hence, these emerging concerns over the foetus' developing brain seem to be situated within the gendered history of policing women's pregnant bodies rather than acting on new insights from scientific discoveries. By situating these developments within the broader framework of risk consciousness, we can link these changes to wider understandings of the 'at risk' child and intensified surveillance over family life.
authors: School of Languages and Social Science, Aston University , Birmingham , UK.
authors: Pam
authors: P
authors: Lowe
authors: School of Sociology Social Policy and Social Research, University of Kent , Canterbury , UK.
authors: Ellie
authors: E
authors: Lee
authors: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Kent , Canterbury , UK.
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: Macvarish
keywords: family policy; foetal development; maternal stress; neuroscience; pregnancy; risk; risk consciousness