title: Online professionalism: A synthetic review.
abstract: The rise of social media has increased connectivity and blurred personal and professional boundaries, bringing new challenges for medical professionalism. Whether traditional professionalism principles apply to the online social media space remains unknown. The purpose of this synthetic literature review was to characterize the original peer-reviewed research studies published between 1 January 2000-1 November 2014 on online professionalism, to assess methodologies and approaches used, and to provide insights to guide future studies in this area. The investigators searched three databases and performed manual searches of bibliographies to identify the 32 studies included. Most studies originated in the USA. Cross-sectional surveys and analyses of publicly available online content were the most common methodologies employed. Studies covered the general areas of use and privacy, assessment of unprofessional online behaviours, consensus-gathering of what constitutes unprofessional or inappropriate online behaviours, and education and policies. Studies were of variable quality; only around half of survey studies had response rates of 50% or greater. Medical trainees were the most common population studied. Future directions for research include public perspectives of online professionalism, impact on patient trust, and how to use social media productively as medical professionals.
authors: VA Medical Center, Washington, DC and George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences , Washington DC , USA.
authors: Katherine C
authors: KC
authors: Chretien
authors: Matthew G
authors: MG
authors: Tuck
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D018907:Privacy; D028743:Professional Misconduct / Q000941:ethics; D000068616:Professionalism / Q000941:ethics; D061108:Social Media / Q000941:ethics