title: The developmental trajectory of intramaze and extramaze landmark biases in spatial navigation: An unexpected journey.
abstract: Adults learning to navigate to a hidden goal within an enclosed space have been found to prefer information provided by the distal cues of an environment, as opposed to proximal landmarks within the environment. Studies with children, however, have shown that 5- or 7-year-olds do not display any preference toward distal or proximal cues during navigation. This suggests that a bias toward learning about distal cues occurs somewhere between the age of 7 years and adulthood. We recruited 5- to 11-year-old children and an adult sample to explore the developmental profile of this putative change. Across a series of 3 experiments, participants were required to navigate to a hidden goal in a virtual environment, the location of which was signaled by both extramaze and intramaze landmark cues. During testing, these cues were placed into conflict to assess the search preferences of participants. Consistent with previously reported findings, adults were biased toward using extramaze information. However, analysis of the data from children, which incorporated age as a continuous variable, suggested that older children in our sample were, in fact, biased toward using the intramaze landmark in our task. These findings suggest the bias toward using distal cues in spatial navigation, frequently displayed by adults, may be a comparatively late developing trait, and one that could supersede an initial developmental preference for proximal landmarks.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology.
authors.forename: Matthew G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Buckley
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Haselgrove
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology.
authors.forename: Alastair D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002657:Child Development; D003463:Cues; D004777:Environment; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D065853:Spatial Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D065854:Spatial Navigation / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Aug;39(1):3-36
references.pmid: 10433786
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 May;79(3):263-99
references.pmid: 11165214
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2002 Jul;13(4):337-41
references.pmid: 12137136
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 2003 Apr;44(2):79-86
references.pmid: 12778975
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 2003 Aug;94(Pt 3):299-317
references.pmid: 14511545
references.citation: Learn Behav. 2004 Aug;32(3):289-98
references.pmid: 15672824
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):44-59
references.pmid: 16435964
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(3-4):296-312
references.pmid: 16492261
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):281-93
references.pmid: 16941155
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jul;33(3):191-212
references.pmid: 17620021
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2008 Mar;56(2):142-63
references.pmid: 17663986
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Sep;33(10):2536-45
references.pmid: 18046306
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5915-20
references.pmid: 18408152
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):353-9
references.pmid: 18411560
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5909-14
references.pmid: 18413609
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2008 Jul;34(3):419-22
references.pmid: 18665724
references.citation: Cogn Behav Neurol. 2008 Sep;21(3):176-8
references.pmid: 18797260
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2008 Sep;11(5):743-9
references.pmid: 18801130
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;44(6):508-13
references.pmid: 18979221
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1369-76
references.pmid: 18980401
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Apr;52(2):336-58
references.pmid: 19252129
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2009 Apr 21;7(4):e1000089
references.pmid: 19385719
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1665-84
references.pmid: 19418377
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2010 Feb 11;207(1):125-37
references.pmid: 19800920
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Aug;63(8):1552-67
references.pmid: 20119881
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):170-80
references.pmid: 20121873
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Sep;63(9):1683-99
references.pmid: 20204918
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 May;36(3):646-58
references.pmid: 20438263
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):152-76
references.pmid: 20570252
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 4;108(1):421-6
references.pmid: 21173235
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1115-27
references.pmid: 23088544
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1033-54
references.pmid: 23456412
references.citation: Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012 Apr;10(1):51-70
references.pmid: 26504617
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 1981 Jan 1;16(1):105-23
references.pmid: 26800630
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1980 Nov;87(6):532-52
references.pmid: 7443916
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1993 Mar;122(1):73-91
references.pmid: 8440978
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1996 Dec;110(6):1205-28
references.pmid: 8986326
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Apr 9;392(6676):598-601
references.pmid: 9560155
references.citation: Anim Learn Behav. 1976 May;4(2):186-92
references.pmid: 964444
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1998 Aug;89 ( Pt 3):463-80
references.pmid: 9734301
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Nov 5;396(6706):75-7
references.pmid: 9817202