title: The importance of population growth and regulation in human life history evolution.
abstract: Explaining the evolution of human life history traits remains an important challenge for evolutionary anthropologists. Progress is hindered by a poor appreciation of how demographic factors affect the action of natural selection. I review life history theory showing that the quantity maximized by selection depends on whether and how population growth is regulated. I show that the common use of R, a strategy's expected lifetime number of offspring, as a fitness maximand is only appropriate under a strict set of conditions, which are apparently unappreciated by anthropologists. To concretely show how demography-free life history theory can lead to errors, I reanalyze an influential model of human life history evolution, which investigated the coevolution of a long lifespan and late age of maturity. I show that the model's conclusions do not hold under simple changes to the implicitly assumed mechanism of density dependence, even when stated assumptions remain unchanged. This analysis suggests that progress in human life history theory requires better understanding of the demography of our ancestors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anthropology. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
authors.forename: Ryan
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Baldini
mesh_terms: D000883:Anthropology; D005075:Biological Evolution; D006801:Humans; D008018:Life Cycle Stages; D011156:Population Density; D011158:Population Growth; D012641:Selection, Genetic
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 1982 Aug;58(4):403-11
references.pmid: 7124934
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Feb 15;88(4):1134-7
references.pmid: 1996315
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):10221-6
references.pmid: 12122210
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):1336-9
references.pmid: 9448332
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9637-42
references.pmid: 12878733
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Jan;59(1):1-10
references.pmid: 10640361
references.citation: Evolution. 1993 Jun;47(3):877-887
references.pmid: 28567901
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Dec;77(12):7501-5
references.pmid: 16592939
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):58-63
references.pmid: 21238201