title: Conspecific density modulates the effect of predation on dispersal rates.
abstract: Dispersal decisions underlie the spatial dynamics of metacommunities. Prey individuals may disperse to reduce the risk of either predation or starvation, and both of these risks may depend on conspecific density. Surprisingly, there is little theory examining how dispersal rates should change in response to the combined effects of predation and changes in conspecific density. We develop such a model and show that, under certain conditions, predators may induce dispersal at low prey densities but not high prey densities. We then experimentally manipulate the density of the ciliate Paramecium aurelia and the perceived presence of its predator, the flatworm Stenostomum virginiamum, in a two-patch metacommunity to parameterise the model. Paramecium dispersed in response to Stenostomum at low densities, but they reduced their dispersal in response to predation risk at high predator densities. By applying our model to the empirical data, we show that this switch in dispersal strategy, linked to increases in prey density, occurred because predators increased the difficulty or risk of dispersal. Together, the model and experiment reveal that the effects of predators on dispersal are contingent on prey density. Previous studies have sometimes reported an increase in dispersal rate when predation risk is elevated, and other times a decrease in dispersal rate. Our demonstration of a switch point, with predation risk increasing dispersal at low prey densities but reducing dispersal above a threshold of prey density, may reconcile the diversity of prey dispersal behaviours reported in these previous investigations and observed in nature.
authors.affiliation: School of the Environment, University of Technology, Sydney, Harris and Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia, edd_hammill@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: Edd
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hammill
authors.forename: Richard G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Fitzjohn
authors.forename: Diane S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Srivastava
mesh_terms: D063147:Animal Distribution; D000818:Animals; D016798:Ciliophora; D008954:Models, Biological; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D048489:Paramecium aurelia; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D014419:Turbellaria
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Jan;154(4):743-54
references.pmid: 17922146
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Aug;88(8):1917-23
references.pmid: 17824421
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 1976 Mar;51(1):3-47
references.pmid: 778893
references.citation: Am Nat. 2010 Dec;176(6):723-31
references.pmid: 20954890
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28924
references.pmid: 22247764
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Feb;55(1):23-36
references.pmid: 9925806
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 1990 Sep;65(3):323-40
references.pmid: 2236483
references.citation: Oecologia. 2001 Apr;127(2):222-229
references.pmid: 24577653
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 May;21(3):705-15
references.pmid: 18355186
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30467
references.pmid: 22291961
references.citation: Oecologia. 2010 May;163(1):193-202
references.pmid: 19936795
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Mar;57(3):574-85
references.pmid: 12703947
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Dec;56(3):243-63
references.pmid: 10607519
references.citation: Oecologia. 2003 Apr;135(2):304-12
references.pmid: 12698353
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2007 May;76(3):552-8
references.pmid: 17439471
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2014 Feb;17(2):175-84
references.pmid: 24304725
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2012 Jan;81(1):108-15
references.pmid: 21714787
references.citation: Am Nat. 2010 May;175(5):577-86
references.pmid: 20331365
references.citation: J Math Biol. 2013 Aug;67(2):329-58
references.pmid: 22660852