title: An energy budget agent-based model of earthworm populations and its application to study the effects of pesticides.
abstract: Earthworms are important organisms in soil communities and so are used as model organisms in environmental risk assessments of chemicals. However current risk assessments of soil invertebrates are based on short-term laboratory studies, of limited ecological relevance, supplemented if necessary by site-specific field trials, which sometimes are challenging to apply across the whole agricultural landscape. Here, we investigate whether population responses to environmental stressors and pesticide exposure can be accurately predicted by combining energy budget and agent-based models (ABMs), based on knowledge of how individuals respond to their local circumstances. A simple energy budget model was implemented within each earthwormEisenia fetidain the ABM, based on a priori parameter estimates. From broadly accepted physiological principles, simple algorithms specify how energy acquisition and expenditure drive life cycle processes. Each individual allocates energy between maintenance, growth and/or reproduction under varying conditions of food density, soil temperature and soil moisture. When simulating published experiments, good model fits were obtained to experimental data on individual growth, reproduction and starvation. Using the energy budget model as a platform we developed methods to identify which of the physiological parameters in the energy budget model (rates of ingestion, maintenance, growth or reproduction) are primarily affected by pesticide applications, producing four hypotheses about how toxicity acts. We tested these hypotheses by comparing model outputs with published toxicity data on the effects of copper oxychloride and chlorpyrifos onE. fetida. Both growth and reproduction were directly affected in experiments in which sufficient food was provided, whilst maintenance was targeted under food limitation. Although we only incorporate toxic effects at the individual level we show how ABMs can readily extrapolate to larger scales by providing good model fits to field population data. The ability of the presented model to fit the available field and laboratory data forE. fetidademonstrates the promise of the agent-based approach in ecology, by showing how biological knowledge can be used to make ecological inferences. Further work is required to extend the approach to populations of more ecologically relevant species studied at the field scale. Such a model could help extrapolate from laboratory to field conditions and from one set of field conditions to another or from species to species.
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, UK.
authors.forename: A S A
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Johnston
authors.affiliation: Environment Department, University of York, UK.
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Hodson
authors.affiliation: Environmental Safety, Syngenta Ltd., Bracknell, UK.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thorbek
authors.affiliation: EcoRisk Solutions Ltd., Norwich, UK.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Alvarez
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, UK.
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Sibly
keywords: Agent based model; Earthworm; Energy budget model; Mechanistic effect model; Pesticides; Toxic stress
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Apr;131(2):196-202
references.pmid: 28547686
references.citation: Ecotoxicology. 2004 Aug;13(6):603-14
references.pmid: 15526864
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2006 Sep-Oct;79(5):878-84
references.pmid: 16927234
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 21;293(5538):2248-51
references.pmid: 11567137
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 May;70(5):985-92
references.pmid: 12719825
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007 Nov;26(11):2383-8
references.pmid: 17941747
references.citation: Oecologia. 1979 Dec;43(3):329-340
references.pmid: 28309889
references.citation: Waste Manag. 2010 Apr;30(4):558-64
references.pmid: 20042324
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Sep;25(9):2490-501
references.pmid: 16986805
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 2007 May;147(1):83-93
references.pmid: 17045713
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Jun;46(6):859-65
references.pmid: 1907515
references.citation: J Environ Sci (China). 2007;19(7):854-8
references.pmid: 17966874
references.citation: Age (Dordr). 2007 Dec;29(4):229-31
references.pmid: 19424841
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;100(1-2):3-6
references.pmid: 1677866
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 1957 Sep;32(3):217-31
references.pmid: 13485376
references.citation: Bioresour Technol. 2004 May;92(3):275-83
references.pmid: 14766161
references.citation: Oecologia. 1992 Jul;90(4):540-549
references.pmid: 28313574
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Feb;82(1):113-42
references.pmid: 17313526
references.citation: J Environ Sci (China). 2011;23(4):676-80
references.pmid: 21793412
references.citation: Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):987-91
references.pmid: 16284171
references.citation: Environ Res. 2004 Sep;96(1):95-101
references.pmid: 15261789
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):479-86
references.pmid: 20605251
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1997 Feb;36(1):72-9
references.pmid: 9056403
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2000 May;46(1):108-16
references.pmid: 10806001
references.citation: BMC Ecol. 2009 Jun 23;9:18
references.pmid: 19549327
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 12;365(1557):3413-28
references.pmid: 20921042
references.citation: Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jan;5(1):167-72
references.pmid: 19431301
references.citation: C R Biol. 2006 Nov;329(11):912-5
references.pmid: 17067935
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1984 Jun;8(3):254-74
references.pmid: 6734503