title: Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: an ERP study.
abstract: While many links have been established between sensory-motor words used literally (kick the ball) and sensory-motor regions of the brain, it is less clear whether metaphorically used words (kick the habit) also show such signs of "embodiment." Additionally, not much is known about the timing or nature of the connection between language and sensory-motor neural processing. We used stimuli divided into three figurativeness conditions-literal, metaphor, and anomalous-and two modality conditions-auditory (Her limousine was a privileged snort) and motion (The editorial was a brass-knuckle punch). The conditions were matched on a large number of potentially confounding factors including cloze probability. The electroencephalographic response to the final word of each sentence was measured at 64 electrode sites on the scalp of 22 participants and event-related potentials (ERPs) calculated. Analysis revealed greater amplitudes for metaphorical than literal sentences in both 350-500 ms and 500-650 ms timeframes. Results supported the possibility of different neural substrates for motion and auditory sentences. Greater differences for motion sentences were seen in the left posterior and left central electrode sites than elsewhere on the scalp. These findings are consistent with a sensory-motor neural categorization of language and with the integration of modal and amodal information during the N400 and P600 timeframes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Hope College Holland, MI, USA.
authors.forename: Gwenda L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Schmidt-Snoek
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Hope College Holland, MI, USA.
authors.forename: Ashley R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Drew
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Hope College Holland, MI, USA.
authors.forename: Elizabeth C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Barile
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Hope College Holland, MI, USA.
authors.forename: Stephen J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Agauas
keywords: N400; P600; auditory; embodied language; familiarity; imageability; metaphor; motion
references.citation: Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
references.pmid: 7350657
references.citation: J Psycholinguist Res. 2013 Aug;42(4):363-78
references.pmid: 22585389
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2006 Jun;97(3):279-93
references.pmid: 16343606
references.citation: Br J Psychol. 1970 Aug;61(3):303-21
references.pmid: 5457503
references.citation: Lang Cogn. 2010 May;2(1):79-116
references.pmid: 20802833
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Sep;23(9):2376-86
references.pmid: 21126156
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:145-55
references.pmid: 19505446
references.citation: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jan;16(1):1-5
references.pmid: 19765354
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2013 Dec;127(3):484-96
references.pmid: 24182839
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2012 Nov;123(2):137-42
references.pmid: 23063676
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2010 Jun;113(3):124-34
references.pmid: 20359737
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90
references.pmid: 19897807
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2002 Sep;30(6):958-68
references.pmid: 12450098
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 May 15;36(1):222-31
references.pmid: 17428685
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):59-70
references.pmid: 18448316
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):673-89
references.pmid: 12956233
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Mar;21(3):191-201
references.pmid: 14755838
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2011 Dec;119(3):149-57
references.pmid: 21684590
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2005 Apr 25;16(6):649-52
references.pmid: 15812326
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:862-9
references.pmid: 23891645
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45
references.pmid: 17705682
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 May 18;1146:128-45
references.pmid: 17433892
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):651-64
references.pmid: 20805587
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
references.pmid: 11301525
references.citation: Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):309-14
references.pmid: 24374210
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Aug 15;52(2):677-85
references.pmid: 20420931
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):375-86
references.pmid: 19586700
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
references.pmid: 20809790
references.citation: Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:127-43
references.pmid: 22361114
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2012 Mar;120(3):416-21
references.pmid: 22305051
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):111-3
references.pmid: 8195414
references.citation: Brain Res. 2007 Dec 5;1183:109-23
references.pmid: 17950260
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3502-13
references.pmid: 22100772
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2010;57(4):260-6
references.pmid: 20178948
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2009 Aug 14;459(3):142-6
references.pmid: 19427368
references.citation: Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):464-77
references.pmid: 19653767
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):35-9
references.pmid: 18472250
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2008 Feb;104(2):145-58
references.pmid: 17659768
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3212-21
references.pmid: 22155328
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):576-82
references.pmid: 15959465