title: Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are rarely included in quality monitoring systems, surgeon comparative feedback reports, or registries. We present the design and implementation of a secure website in a federally funded research program-Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR)-to return comparative PRO reports to participating surgeons, in addition to including traditional quality measures, in order to monitor and improve quality and health outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  The surgeon-specific comparative PRO reports were designed and structured based on user input for content, data elements, integration, and display. Three questions are addressed regarding the knee and hip joint symptom profiles of patients before TJR, as well as outcomes of surgery. The website is organized with a hierarchical structure to display data at national, practice, and individual surgeon levels, and provides a comprehensive site-level executive summary and surgeon-level data reports that can be downloaded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  As of September 2014, over 22,000 patients were enrolled from more than 130 surgeons in 22 states. The reporting website was launched in September 2012 and has been updated quarterly for all surgeons to review their site- and individual-specific outcomes data compared to national benchmarks.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this novel system, quarterly comparative surgeon feedback extends beyond traditional measures of complication rates to include PROs of pain relief and functional gain. We anticipate that this enhanced data will facilitate patient-centered quality improvement (QI) and outcomes research from the registry. As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and other insurers consider future implementation of PROs, surgeons will increasingly need comparative data by which to self-monitor their practice outcomes.
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
authors.forename: Hua
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Zheng
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
authors.forename: Wenjun
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Li
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
authors.forename: Leslie
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Harrold
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Ayers
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
authors.forename: Patricia D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Franklin
keywords: 2014 EDM Forum Symposium; Patient-Centered Outcomes; Patient-Reported Outcomes; Quality Improvement; Surgeon Report Card
references.citation: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11
references.pmid: 21923316
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3482-8
references.pmid: 23897504
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1017-26
references.pmid: 21952744
references.citation: EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 22;2(1):1107
references.pmid: 25848596
references.citation: JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1217-8
references.pmid: 23011710
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3419-25
references.pmid: 23925525
references.citation: Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Jun 29;2:32
references.pmid: 15225377