title: Classifying acoustic signals into phoneme categories: average and dyslexic readers make use of complex dynamical patterns and multifractal scaling properties of the speech signal.
abstract: Several competing aetiologies of developmental dyslexia suggest that the problems with acquiring literacy skills are causally entailed by low-level auditory and/or speech perception processes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diverging claims about the specific deficient peceptual processes under conditions of strong inference. Theoretically relevant acoustic features were extracted from a set of artificial speech stimuli that lie on a /bAk/-/dAk/ continuum. The features were tested on their ability to enable a simple classifier (Quadratic Discriminant Analysis) to reproduce the observed classification performance of average and dyslexic readers in a speech perception experiment. The 'classical' features examined were based on component process accounts of developmental dyslexia such as the supposed deficit in Envelope Rise Time detection and the deficit in the detection of rapid changes in the distribution of energy in the frequency spectrum (formant transitions). Studies examining these temporal processing deficit hypotheses do not employ measures that quantify the temporal dynamics of stimuli. It is shown that measures based on quantification of the dynamics of complex, interaction-dominant systems (Recurrence Quantification Analysis and the multifractal spectrum) enable QDA to classify the stimuli almost identically as observed in dyslexic and average reading participants. It seems unlikely that participants used any of the features that are traditionally associated with accounts of (impaired) speech perception. The nature of the variables quantifying the temporal dynamics of the speech stimuli imply that the classification of speech stimuli cannot be regarded as a linear aggregate of component processes that each parse the acoustic signal independent of one another, as is assumed by the 'classical' aetiologies of developmental dyslexia. It is suggested that the results imply that the differences in speech perception performance between average and dyslexic readers represent a scaled continuum rather than being caused by a specific deficient component.
authors.affiliation: School of Pedagogical and Educational Science, Radboud University Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Fred
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Hasselman
keywords: Aetiology; Auditory temporal processing deficit; Complexity matching; Complexity science; Developmental dyslexia; Recurrence quantification analysis; Rise time perception deficit; Speech perception; Strong inference; Theory evaluation
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Feb;20(1):3-16
references.pmid: 8133223
references.citation: Cortex. 2011 Jun;47(6):674-89
references.pmid: 20843509
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Jun 14;682:27-47
references.pmid: 7686725
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1811-32
references.pmid: 19968438
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):361-77
references.pmid: 17048719
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Feb;33(1):201-8
references.pmid: 17311488
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Mar 7;416(6876):87-90
references.pmid: 11882898
references.citation: Front Physiol. 2012 May 23;3:116
references.pmid: 22654760
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 May;83(5 Pt 1):051130
references.pmid: 21728513
references.citation: Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2012 Jul;16(3):353-79
references.pmid: 22695153
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1974 Jan;12(1):83-93
references.pmid: 4821193
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Sep;19(3):561-71
references.pmid: 979217
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6;99(16):10911-6
references.pmid: 12142463
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jan;15(1):3-10
references.pmid: 21093350
references.citation: Ann Dyslexia. 2012 Jul;62(2):100-19
references.pmid: 22460607
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1217-31
references.pmid: 21585450
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Sep;5(9):721-8
references.pmid: 15322530
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Oct;57(7):977-88
references.pmid: 8532501
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1997 Apr;20(4):147-52
references.pmid: 9106353
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jun;126(3):289-306
references.pmid: 10382616
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1967 Nov;74(6):431-61
references.pmid: 4170865
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):148-203
references.pmid: 25844873
references.citation: J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jun;172(3):579-598
references.pmid: 19649268
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13907-12
references.pmid: 11095716
references.citation: Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2003 May;129(2):183-206
references.pmid: 14606733
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2007 Apr;101(1):19-30
references.pmid: 16887179
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 15;37(2):489-503
references.pmid: 17600730
references.citation: Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):657-97
references.pmid: 17604860
references.citation: Front Physiol. 2013 Apr 08;4:75
references.pmid: 23580349
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 5;367(1591):906-18
references.pmid: 22371613
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):720-6
references.pmid: 15541512
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):3-29
references.pmid: 15631549
references.citation: Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Oct 10;10:90
references.pmid: 21985357
references.citation: Nature. 1995 Jul 20;376(6537):236-8
references.pmid: 7617033
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Jun;50(3):647-66
references.pmid: 17538107
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Sep;132(3):331-50
references.pmid: 13678372
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2011 Oct 17;5:62
references.pmid: 22046149
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 19;99 Suppl 1:2466-72
references.pmid: 11875196
references.citation: Ann Dyslexia. 2014 Oct;64(3):202-21
references.pmid: 25079036
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Sep 15;88(18):7943-7
references.pmid: 1896444
references.citation: Dyslexia. 2001 Jan-Mar;7(1):12-36
references.pmid: 11305228
references.citation: Biomed Eng Online. 2007 Jun 26;6:23
references.pmid: 17594480
references.citation: IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998 Sep;6(3):257-68
references.pmid: 9749903
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Apr;35(2):252-63
references.pmid: 22240013
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2304-15
references.pmid: 25285431
references.citation: Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2009 Jan;13(1):79-98
references.pmid: 19061546
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Dec;47(6):1259-69
references.pmid: 15842009
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Mar;82(1-3):139-59
references.pmid: 8475763
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):407-13
references.pmid: 17576280
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2006 May;9(3):257-9; discussion 265-9
references.pmid: 16669793
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Dec;2(4):460-93
references.pmid: 24203785
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71914
references.pmid: 23977177
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1995 Nov;52(5):4691-4698
references.pmid: 9963964
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):137-48
references.pmid: 22865163
references.citation: J Physiol Paris. 2009 Nov;103(6):315-23
references.pmid: 19500670
references.citation: Cogn Neurodyn. 2007 Dec;1(4):317-25
references.pmid: 19003502
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):34-43
references.pmid: 21159086
references.citation: Cortex. 2009 Jan;45(1):119-30
references.pmid: 19046744
references.citation: Biosystems. 2001 Feb;59(2):109-23
references.pmid: 11267739
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Oct;116(4 Pt 1):2338-44
references.pmid: 15532664
references.citation: Science. 1964 Oct 16;146(3642):347-53
references.pmid: 17739513
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 11;8:713
references.pmid: 25309389
references.citation: Infant Behav Dev. 2007 Dec;30(4):568-86
references.pmid: 17588668
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 1999 Mar;8(1):1-44
references.pmid: 10072692
references.citation: Science. 1988 Mar 25;239(4847):1513-20
references.pmid: 3281253
references.citation: Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):81-4
references.pmid: 8539604
references.citation: Front Neuroinform. 2010 May 14;4:8
references.pmid: 20514144
references.citation: Chemphyschem. 2002 Mar 12;3(3):285-90
references.pmid: 12503175
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):326-32
references.pmid: 12760618
references.citation: J Commun Disord. 2005 Nov-Dec;38(6):499-514
references.pmid: 15970201
references.citation: Science. 1996 Jan 5;271(5245):77-81
references.pmid: 8539603
references.citation: Front Physiol. 2012 Jun 04;3:141
references.pmid: 22675302
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2003 Sep;86(3):395-412
references.pmid: 12972370