title: Mobile Phone Assessment in Egocentric Networks: A Pilot Study on Gay Men and Their Peers.
abstract: Mobile phone-based data collection encompasses the richness of social network research. Both individual-level and network-level measures can be recorded. For example, health-related behaviors can be reported via mobile assessment. Social interactions can be assessed by phone-log data. Yet the potential of mobile phone data collection has largely been untapped. This is especially true of egocentric studies in public health settings where mobile phones can enhance both data collection and intervention delivery, e.g. mobile users can video chat with counselors. This is due in part to privacy issues and other barriers that are more difficult to address outside of academic settings where most mobile research to date has taken place. In this article, we aim to inform a broader discussion on mobile research. In particular, benefits and challenges to mobile phone-based data collection are highlighted through our mobile phone-based pilot study that was conducted on egocentric networks of 12 gay men (n = 44 total participants). HIV-transmission and general health behaviors were reported through a mobile phone-based daily assessment that was administered through study participants' own mobile phones. Phone log information was collected from gay men with Android phones. Benefits and challenges to mobile implementation are discussed, along with the application of multi-level models to the type of longitudinal egocentric data that we collected.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the University of California, Los Angeles, California. He is also a Methods Core scientist for the Center for HIV Identification, Prevention, and Treatment Services (CHIPTS; P30MH058107).
authors.forename: W Scott
authors.initials: WS
authors.lastname: Comulada
keywords: Gay men; HIV risk behaviors; ecological momentary assessment; mobile phone log; ohmage
references.citation: Connect (Tor). 2013 Jul;33(1):24-34
references.pmid: 25309015
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7332-6
references.pmid: 17456605
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1193-4
references.pmid: 12016186
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Dec 04;337:a2338
references.pmid: 19056788
references.citation: Soc Networks. 2012 Oct 1;34(4):691-700
references.pmid: 23243335
references.citation: Int J Med Inform. 2013 Apr;82(4):e38-46
references.pmid: 22704234
references.citation: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Nov 04;5:55
references.pmid: 18983668
references.citation: Science. 2012 Jul 6;337(6090):49-53
references.pmid: 22767921
references.citation: Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):721-3
references.pmid: 19197046
references.citation: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Mar;30(2):105-11
references.pmid: 16490673
references.citation: Biometrics. 2008 Jun;64(2):627-34
references.pmid: 17970819
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1999 May 15;149(10):950-4
references.pmid: 10342804
references.citation: AIDS. 2013 Jun 1;27(9):1461-71
references.pmid: 23435303
references.citation: Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
references.pmid: 18509902
references.citation: Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Feb;15(Pt 1):1-39
references.pmid: 19646331
references.citation: Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Mar;24(1):109-18
references.pmid: 20307117
references.citation: Control Clin Trials. 2003 Apr;24(2):182-99
references.pmid: 12689739
references.citation: AIDS Behav. 2009 Dec;13(6):1253-61
references.pmid: 19357944
references.citation: Stat Interface. 2009;2(4):391-401
references.pmid: 20357914
references.citation: Nutr J. 2010 Apr 15;9:19
references.pmid: 20398314
references.citation: J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003 May-Jun;35(3):148-53
references.pmid: 12773286
references.citation: AIDS Behav. 2015 Feb;19(2):330-40
references.pmid: 25331266