title: Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Bed rest in hospital or at home is widely recommended for the prevention of preterm birth. This advice is based on the observation that hard work and hard physical activity during pregnancy could be associated with preterm birth and with the idea that bed rest could reduce uterine activity. However, bed rest may have some adverse effects on other outcomes.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the effect of prescription of bed rest in hospital or at home for preventing preterm birth in pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (18 December 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2014, Issue 12), MEDLINE (December 2014), EMBASE (December 2014), LILACS (December 2014), and bibliographies of relevant papers.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized, cluster-randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials with reported data that assess clinical outcomes in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth who were prescribed bed rest in hospital or at home for preventing preterm birth, and their babies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two studies met the inclusion criteria. One study was not considered for the meta-analysis, since data combined singleton and multiple pregnancies. No differences in any maternal and perinatal outcomes were reported by the authors. This study was at low risk of selection, performance, detection and attrition bias. Only data from one study were included in the meta-analysis (1266 women). This study was at unclear risk of bias for most domains due to lack of reporting. Four hundred and thirty-two women were prescribed bed rest at home and a total of 834 women received a placebo (412) or no intervention (422). Preterm birth before 37 weeks was similar in both groups (7.9% in the intervention group versus 8.5% in the control group; risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 1.37). No other results were reported for any of the other primary or secondary outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is no evidence, either supporting or refuting the use of bed rest at home or in hospital, to prevent preterm birth. Although bed rest in hospital or at home is widely used as the first step of treatment, there is no evidence that this practice could be beneficial. Due to the potential adverse effects that bed rest could have on women and their families, and the increased costs for the healthcare system, clinicians should discuss the pros and cons of bed rest to prevent preterm birth. Potential benefits and harms should be discussed with women facing an increased risk of preterm birth. Appropriate research is mandatory. Future trials should evaluate both the effectiveness of bed rest, and the effectiveness of the prescription of bed rest, to prevent preterm birth.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - School of Medicine, University of Uruguay, Echevarriarza 3320 Apartment 701, Montevideo, Uruguay, 11300.
authors.forename: Claudio G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Sosa
authors.forename: Fernando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Althabe
authors.forename: José M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Belizán
authors.forename: Eduardo
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bergel
mesh_terms: D001510:Bed Rest / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D018566:Pregnancy, High-Risk; D047928:Premature Birth / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Mar;119(3):309-22
references.pmid: 6702809
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD000940
references.pmid: 23728634
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;166(6 Pt 1):1629-41; discussion 1641-5
references.pmid: 1615970
references.citation: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):423-30
references.pmid: 9252890
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):104-13
references.pmid: 2293743
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD000490
references.pmid: 17443502
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004454
references.pmid: 16856047
references.citation: J Perinatol. 2005 Oct;25(10):626-30
references.pmid: 16107874
references.citation: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;30(2):165-73
references.pmid: 11308106
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;84(1):131-6
references.pmid: 8008308
references.citation: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992 Mar;72(3):158-61, 191
references.pmid: 1319808
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 07;(7):CD000110
references.pmid: 20614420
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003581
references.pmid: 14974024
references.citation: Lancet. 1999 Oct 9;354(9186):1229-33
references.pmid: 10520630
references.citation: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Aug;36(4):577-82
references.pmid: 21854162
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 May 24;344(21):1594-602
references.pmid: 11372012
references.citation: Image J Nurs Sch. 1996 Fall;28(3):253-8
references.pmid: 8854548
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1089-92
references.pmid: 10819836
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 10;312(2):82-90
references.pmid: 3880598
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):54-62
references.pmid: 8296845
references.citation: Biol Res Nurs. 2010 Oct;12(2):106-24
references.pmid: 20798159
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1993 Jul-Aug;42(4):197-203
references.pmid: 8337156
references.citation: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Nov;87(11):949-57
references.pmid: 7002205
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1305-8
references.pmid: 23812466
references.citation: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985 Jun;39(2):129-34
references.pmid: 4040151
references.citation: Nurs Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;51(2):92-9
references.pmid: 11984379
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 05;(12):CD000246
references.pmid: 24307518
references.citation: Dan Med Bull. 1979 May;26(3):116-8
references.pmid: 446106
references.citation: J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1994 Mar-Apr;23(3):246-51
references.pmid: 8207556