title: Scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities using functional diversity and community deconstruction approaches.
abstract: Community structure is driven by mechanisms linked to environmental, spatial and temporal processes, which have been successfully addressed using metacommunity framework. The relative importance of processes shaping community structure can be identified using several different approaches. Two approaches that are increasingly being used are functional diversity and community deconstruction. Functional diversity is measured using various indices that incorporate distinct community attributes. Community deconstruction is a way to disentangle species responses to ecological processes by grouping species with similar traits. We used these two approaches to determine whether they are improvements over traditional measures (e.g., species composition, abundance, biomass) for identification of the main processes driving dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) community structure in a fragmented mainland-island landscape in southern Brazilian Atlantic Forest. We sampled five sites in each of four large forest areas, two on the mainland and two on the island. Sampling was performed in 2012 and 2013. We collected abundance and biomass data from 100 sampling points distributed over 20 sampling sites. We studied environmental, spatial and temporal effects on dung beetle community across three spatial scales, i.e., between sites, between areas and mainland-island. The γ-diversity based on species abundance was mainly attributed to β-diversity as a consequence of the increase in mean α- and β-diversity between areas. Variation partitioning on abundance, biomass and functional diversity showed scale-dependence of processes structuring dung beetle metacommunities. We identified two major groups of responses among 17 functional groups. In general, environmental filters were important at both local and regional scales. Spatial factors were important at the intermediate scale. Our study supports the notion of scale-dependence of environmental, spatial and temporal processes in the distribution and functional organization of Scarabaeinae beetles. We conclude that functional diversity may be used as a complementary approach to traditional measures, and that community deconstruction allows sufficient disentangling of responses of different trait-based groups.
authors.affiliation: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
authors.forename: Pedro Giovâni da
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Silva
authors.affiliation: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
authors.forename: Malva Isabel Medina
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Hernández
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D001938:Brazil; D001517:Coleoptera; D004777:Environment; D062211:Spatio-Temporal Analysis
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Mar;93(3):490-9
references.pmid: 22624204
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2614-25
references.pmid: 17089669
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 May;27(5):253-4
references.pmid: 22325446
references.citation: Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):271-280
references.pmid: 28547606
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54580
references.pmid: 23355879
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):538-47
references.pmid: 21352458
references.citation: Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804-8
references.pmid: 11679658
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Feb;11(2):139-50
references.pmid: 18031554
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Feb;91(2):386-98
references.pmid: 20392004
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20404-9
references.pmid: 18077371
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Oct 30;9(10):e111883
references.pmid: 25356729
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2253-62
references.pmid: 19739387
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Oct;88(10):2427-39
references.pmid: 18027744
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Jul;166(3):819-31
references.pmid: 21305321
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):299-305
references.pmid: 20380219
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57786
references.pmid: 23460906
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Nov 27;365(1558):3611-20
references.pmid: 20980310
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Aug;89(8):2290-301
references.pmid: 18724739
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2005 Nov;8(11):1175-82
references.pmid: 21352441
references.citation: Ecology. 2013 Jan;94(1):180-9
references.pmid: 23600252
references.citation: Am Nat. 2003 Nov;162(5):544-57
references.pmid: 14618534
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Mar 09;5(3):e9609
references.pmid: 20231897
references.citation: Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):262-72
references.pmid: 20380215
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2008 Oct;22(5):1288-98
references.pmid: 18616744
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Sep;26(9):482-91
references.pmid: 21641673
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Mar 23;6(3):e17976
references.pmid: 21448292
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2623-32
references.pmid: 18831183
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1094-104
references.pmid: 17922706
references.citation: An Acad Bras Cienc. 2013 Apr-Jun;85(2):679-97
references.pmid: 23828347
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Jun;27(6):323-9
references.pmid: 22341499
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Sep;15(9):923-34
references.pmid: 22697353
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2013 Aug;16(8):951-63
references.pmid: 23809147
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):740-7
references.pmid: 22583795
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18555-60
references.pmid: 18003934
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20684-9
references.pmid: 18093933
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
references.pmid: 10706275
references.citation: Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014 Aug;2:7-13
references.pmid: 32846722
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85
references.pmid: 16701083