title: The effects of drought and shade on the performance, morphology and physiology of Ghanaian tree species.
abstract: In tropical forests light and water availability are the most important factors for seedling growth and survival but an increasing frequency of drought may affect tree regeneration. One central question is whether drought and shade have interactive effects on seedling growth and survival. Here, we present results of a greenhouse experiment, in which seedlings of 10 Ghanaian tree species were exposed to combinations of strong seasonal drought (continuous watering versus withholding water for nine weeks) and shade (5% irradiance versus 20% irradiance). We evaluated the effects of drought and shade on seedling survival and growth and plasticity of 11 underlying traits related to biomass allocation, morphology and physiology. Seedling survival under dry conditions was higher in shade than in high light, thus providing support for the "facilitation hypothesis" that shade enhances plant performance through improved microclimatic conditions, and rejecting the trade-off hypothesis that drought should have stronger impact in shade because of reduced root investment. Shaded plants had low biomass fraction in roots, in line with the trade-off hypothesis, but they compensated for this with a higher specific root length (i.e., root length per unit root mass), resulting in a similar root length per plant mass and, hence, similar water uptake capacity as high-light plants. The majority (60%) of traits studied responded independently to drought and shade, indicating that within species shade- and drought tolerances are not in trade-off, but largely uncoupled. When individual species responses were analysed, then for most of the traits only one to three species showed significant interactive effects between drought and shade. The uncoupled response of most species to drought and shade should provide ample opportunity for niche differentiation and species coexistence under a range of water and light conditions. Overall our greenhouse results suggest that, in the absence of root competition shaded tropical forest tree seedlings may be able to survive prolonged drought.
authors.affiliation: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana; Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Lucy
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Amissah
authors.affiliation: Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Godefridus M J
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Mohren
authors.affiliation: College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
authors.forename: Boateng
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kyereh
authors.affiliation: Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Lourens
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Poorter
mesh_terms: D001692:Biological Transport; D018533:Biomass; D005869:Ghana; D008027:Light; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects*; D036226:Seedlings / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects; D014197:Trees / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000528:radiation effects*; D014329:Tropical Climate; D014867:Water / Q000494:pharmacology* / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D014867:Water
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Jul;132(3):1439-47
references.pmid: 12857825
references.citation: Science. 2011 Feb 4;331(6017):554
references.pmid: 21292971
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2002 Jul;90(1):37-42
references.pmid: 12125771
references.citation: J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Dec;50(12):1549-56
references.pmid: 19093973
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 Aug;80(3):309-320
references.pmid: 28312058
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Oct;15(10):1120-9
references.pmid: 22812661
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Feb;18(2):65-71
references.pmid: 23084466
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;176(4):749-763
references.pmid: 17997761
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739
references.pmid: 18422905
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Sep;145(2):252-7
references.pmid: 16025357
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 29;359(1443):311-29
references.pmid: 15212087
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 7;111(40):14489-93
references.pmid: 25246559
references.citation: Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):212-5
references.pmid: 18464740
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
references.pmid: 22930834
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;170(4):795-806
references.pmid: 16684239
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20610-5
references.pmid: 19218454
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2002 Nov;53(378):2239-47
references.pmid: 12379791
references.citation: Oecologia. 1992 Apr;89(4):457-463
references.pmid: 28311873
references.citation: Oecologia. 2002 Apr;131(2):175-185
references.pmid: 28547684
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):565-70
references.pmid: 23267086
references.citation: Nature. 2007 May 3;447(7140):80-2
references.pmid: 17476266
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 2011 Sep;31(9):1024-37
references.pmid: 21893522
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2008 Oct;35(8):725-737
references.pmid: 32688826
references.citation: Oecologia. 1992 Apr;90(1):50-60
references.pmid: 28312270
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2755-65
references.pmid: 19886485
references.citation: Oecologia. 1991 Apr;86(2):292-297
references.pmid: 28313213