title: What Patient Characteristics Could Potentially Affect Patient Satisfaction Scores During Spine Clinic?
abstract: METHODS
  Prospective study.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Assess which patient factors are associated with patient satisfaction scores in the outpatient spine clinic setting.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Patient satisfaction has become an important component of quality assessments, and thereby pay-for-performance metrics, made by government, hospitals, and insurance providers.
  
  
  METHODS
  During a 7-month period, 200 patients were contacted via phone within 3 weeks of a new patient encounter with 1 of 11 spine providers. A standardized patient satisfaction phone survey consisting of 25 questions, answered using a 1-10 scale, was then administered. Patient demographics, medical/social history, and previous treatment were prospectively recorded. Potential associations between these patient factors and 3 outcomes of interest were investigated: (1) provider satisfaction, (2) overall clinic visit satisfaction, and (3) overall quality of care during clinic visit.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Younger age, less formal education, and smoking were associated with diminished provider satisfaction, overall clinic visit satisfaction, and perceived overall quality of care (P ≤ 0.0001). Male patients were significantly less satisfied with their clinic visit compared with females (P = 0.029). Those treated under a worker's compensation claim were significantly less satisfied with their provider and overall quality of care (P ≤ 0.02). Marital status, working status, mental health history, travel distance, pain characteristics, previous treatments, and current narcotic use were not significant determinants of patient satisfaction (P > 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study found that those patients who were younger, with less formal education, and active smokers had lower patient satisfaction scores. Because patient satisfaction is increasingly being used in assessments of quality of care, it is essential that these factors be considered when evaluating a given provider's practice. This information is important to providers by helping guide individualized patient interactions while in clinic, as well as, the various agencies collecting satisfaction scores allowing them to account for potential sampling bias.
  
  
  METHODS
  1.
authors.affiliation: *Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA †Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN; and ‡OrthoCarolina Spine Center, Charlotte, NC.
authors.forename: Jesse E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Bible
authors.forename: Harrison F
authors.initials: HF
authors.lastname: Kay
authors.forename: David N
authors.initials: DN
authors.lastname: Shau
authors.forename: Kevin R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: OʼNeill
authors.forename: P Bradley
authors.initials: PB
authors.lastname: Segebarth
authors.forename: Clinton J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Devin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities; D004522:Educational Status; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012737:Sex Factors; D012907:Smoking / Q000523:psychology; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D062606:Tertiary Care Centers; D055815:Young Adult