title: Exploring the knowledge behind predictions in everyday cognition: an iterated learning study.
abstract: Making accurate predictions about events is an important but difficult task. Recent work suggests that people are adept at this task, making predictions that reflect surprisingly accurate knowledge of the distributions of real quantities. Across three experiments, we used an iterated learning procedure to explore the basis of this knowledge: to what extent is domain experience critical to accurate predictions and how accurate are people when faced with unfamiliar domains? In Experiment 1, two groups of participants, one resident in Australia, the other in China, predicted the values of quantities familiar to both (movie run-times), unfamiliar to both (the lengths of Pharaoh reigns), and familiar to one but unfamiliar to the other (cake baking durations and the lengths of Beijing bus routes). While predictions from both groups were reasonably accurate overall, predictions were inaccurate in the selectively unfamiliar domains and, surprisingly, predictions by the China-resident group were also inaccurate for a highly familiar domain: local bus route lengths. Focusing on bus routes, two follow-up experiments with Australia-resident groups clarified the knowledge and strategies that people draw upon, plus important determinants of accurate predictions. For unfamiliar domains, people appear to rely on extrapolating from (not simply directly applying) related knowledge. However, we show that people's predictions are subject to two sources of error: in the estimation of quantities in a familiar domain and extension to plausible values in an unfamiliar domain. We propose that the key to successful predictions is not simply domain experience itself, but explicit experience of relevant quantities.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
authors.forename: Rachel G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Stephens
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. john.c.dunn@adelaide.edu.au.
authors.forename: John C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Li-Lin
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Rao
authors.affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Shu
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Bayesian inference; Cross-cultural comparison; Everyday reasoning; Iterated learning
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
references.pmid: 9176952
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):311-8
references.pmid: 16623688
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2007 May 6;31(3):441-80
references.pmid: 21635304
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;33(6):969-98
references.pmid: 21585493
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):767-73
references.pmid: 16984293
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):725-43
references.pmid: 21875247
references.citation: Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
references.pmid: 17835457
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1133-47
references.pmid: 21585446
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 Sep;12(5):391-6
references.pmid: 11554672