title: The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.
abstract: Both normative and many descriptive theories of decision making under risk are based on the notion that outcomes are weighted by their probability, with subsequent maximization of the (subjective) expected outcome. Numerous investigations from psychology, economics, and neuroscience have produced evidence consistent with this notion. However, this research has typically investigated choices involving relatively affect-poor, monetary outcomes. We compared choice in relatively affect-poor, monetary lottery problems with choice in relatively affect-rich medical decision problems. Computational modeling of behavioral data and model-based neuroimaging analyses provide converging evidence for substantial differences in the respective decision mechanisms. Relative to affect-poor choices, affect-rich choices yielded a more strongly curved probability weighting function of cumulative prospect theory, thus signaling that the psychological impact of probabilities is strongly diminished for affect-rich outcomes. Examining task-dependent brain activation, we identified a region-by-condition interaction indicating qualitative differences of activation between affect-rich and affect-poor choices. Moreover, brain activation in regions that were more active during affect-poor choices (e.g., the supramarginal gyrus) correlated with individual trial-by-trial decision weights, indicating that these regions reflect processing of probabilities. Formal reverse inference Neurosynth meta-analyses suggested that whereas affect-poor choices seem to be based on brain mechanisms for calculative processes, affect-rich choices are driven by the representation of outcomes' emotional value and autobiographical memories associated with them. These results provide evidence that the traditional notion of expectation maximization may not apply in the context of outcomes laden with affective responses, and that understanding the brain mechanisms of decision making requires the domain of the decision to be taken into account.
authors.affiliation: Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Renata S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Suter
authors.affiliation: Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Thorsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pachur
authors.affiliation: Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Ralph
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hertwig
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
authors.forename: Tor
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Endestad
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
authors.forename: Guido
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Biele
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008959:Models, Neurological; D012309:Risk-Taking; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 May 12;30(19):6613-9
references.pmid: 20463224
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):23-30
references.pmid: 14979749
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references.pmid: 18545266
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
references.pmid: 21979382
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:35-53
references.pmid: 17416921
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Feb;10(2):64-9
references.pmid: 16406759
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19
references.pmid: 15501092
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May;25(1):185-98
references.pmid: 15846810
references.citation: Neuron. 2009 May 28;62(4):593-602
references.pmid: 19477159
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2009 Mar;45(1 Suppl):S173-86
references.pmid: 19059349
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Sep 1;47(5):763-70
references.pmid: 16129404
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2001 Mar;127(2):267-86
references.pmid: 11316014
references.citation: Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1393-400
references.pmid: 21903802
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):34-50
references.pmid: 15795132
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):185-90
references.pmid: 11437299
references.citation: Health Psychol. 2009 Mar;28(2):210-6
references.pmid: 19290713
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1227-45
references.pmid: 18042495
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 18;29(7):2231-7
references.pmid: 19228976
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:647-72
references.pmid: 17883335
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1399-406
references.pmid: 16615387
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):910-24
references.pmid: 11107882
references.citation: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Feb;23(2):137-52
references.pmid: 14964560
references.citation: Front Neuroinform. 2011 Sep 06;5:17
references.pmid: 21922006
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1446-65
references.pmid: 18980407
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 27;4:646
references.pmid: 24151472
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):381-90
references.pmid: 16880132
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2011 Aug;8(8):665-70
references.pmid: 21706013
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Sep;8(9):1255-62
references.pmid: 16116457
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:87-115
references.pmid: 16318590
references.citation: Science. 1994 May 20;264(5162):1102-5
references.pmid: 8178168
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1999 Feb;38(1):129-66
references.pmid: 10090801
references.citation: Neuroinformatics. 2005;3(1):65-78
references.pmid: 15897617
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3801-11
references.pmid: 18829433
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
references.pmid: 12391568
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8
references.pmid: 11557895
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):515-8
references.pmid: 17255512
references.citation: Neuron. 2012 Dec 6;76(5):998-1009
references.pmid: 23217747
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):653-60
references.pmid: 15808966