title: Markets, breastfeeding and trade in mothers' milk.
abstract: This introduction to a special issue on the economics of breastfeeding draws attention to the lack of economic justice for women. Human milk is being bought and sold. Commodifying and marketing human milk and breastfeeding risk reinforcing social and gender economic inequities. Yet there are potential benefits for breastfeeding, and some of the world's poorest women might profit. How can we improve on the present situation where everyone except the woman who donates her milk benefits? Breastfeeding is a global food production system with unsurpassed capacity to promote children's food security and maternal and child health, but it is side-lined by trade negotiators who seek instead to expand world markets for cow's milk-based formula. Regulators focus on potential risks of feeding donated human milk, rather than on health risks of exposing infants and young children to highly processed bovine milk. Similarly, policymakers aspire to provide universal health care access that may be unaffordable when two thirds of the world's children are not optimally nourished in infancy, resulting in a global double burden of infectious and chronic disease. Universal breastfeeding requires greater commitment of resources, but such investment remains lacking despite the cost effectiveness of breastfeeding protection, support and promotion in and beyond health services. Women invest substantially in breastfeeding but current policy - epitomised by the G20 approach to the 'gender gap' - fails to acknowledge the economic value of this unpaid care work. Economic incentives for mothers to optimally breastfeed are dwarfed by health system and commercial incentives promoting formula feeding and by government fiscal policies which ignore the resulting economic costs. 'The market' fails to protect breastfeeding, because market prices give the wrong signals. An economic approach to the problem of premature weaning from optimal breastfeeding may help prioritise global maternity protection as the foundation for sustainable development of human capital and labour productivity. It would remove fiscal subsidies for breast milk substitutes, tax their sale to recoup health system costs, and penalise their free supply, promotion and distribution. By removing widespread incentives for premature weaning, the resources would be available for the world to invest more in breastfeeding.
authors.affiliation: Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
authors.forename: Julie P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Smith
keywords: Breast feeding/economics; Child health; Cost of illness; Cost-benefit analysis; Formula feeding; Health priorities; Health promotion/economics; Infant formula; Infant mortality; Maternal employment; Maternity leave; National health programs/economics
references.citation: Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Feb 23;10:6
references.pmid: 25784954
references.citation: Early Hum Dev. 2009 Nov;85(11):701-4
references.pmid: 19766412
references.citation: Australas Med J. 2012;5(5):275-83
references.pmid: 22848324
references.citation: Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Apr 11;9:22
references.pmid: 27408614
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e92-9
references.pmid: 16818542
references.citation: Am J Dis Child. 1981 Oct;135(10):892-4
references.pmid: 7293987
references.citation: Breastfeed Med. 2011 Oct;6:281-6
references.pmid: 22007810
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):187-95
references.pmid: 12133652
references.citation: BMJ. 2009 Apr 09;338:b1415
references.pmid: 19359291
references.citation: Acta Paediatr. 2006 May;95(5):540-6
references.pmid: 16825133
references.citation: Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Feb 23;10:7
references.pmid: 25750657
references.citation: Int Breastfeed J. 2008 Aug 04;3:8
references.pmid: 18680575
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Dec;47 Suppl:S23-31; discussion S31-2
references.pmid: 7713303
references.citation: J Hum Lact. 2013 Nov;29(4):547-55
references.pmid: 24106021
references.citation: Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Dec;26(6):543-51
references.pmid: 12530799
references.citation: BMJ. 2012 Aug 13;345:e5047
references.pmid: 22893568
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):111-119
references.pmid: 23743465
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010 Apr;26(2):133-40
references.pmid: 20392315
references.citation: BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 18;4(7):e005524
references.pmid: 25037645
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1048-56
references.pmid: 20368314
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Oct 8;378(9799):1325-38
references.pmid: 21944375
references.citation: Breastfeed Med. 2012 Feb;7(1):29-37
references.pmid: 21718117
references.citation: Adv Nutr. 2014 Mar 01;5(2):207-12
references.pmid: 24618763
references.citation: J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Jul;102(7):981-4
references.pmid: 12146564
references.citation: BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S18
references.pmid: 24564728
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Mar 29;12:22
references.pmid: 22458841
references.citation: Lancet. 2013 Dec 7;382(9908):1898-955
references.pmid: 24309475
references.citation: Breastfeed Rev. 2008 Mar;16(1):25-9
references.pmid: 18546574
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Oct 30;9(10):e111322
references.pmid: 25357121
references.citation: J Hum Lact. 2009 May;25(2):206-10
references.pmid: 19414822
references.citation: Global Health. 2013 Oct 16;9:46
references.pmid: 24131595
references.citation: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;60(1):189-207
references.pmid: 23178065
references.citation: Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Feb 23;10:8
references.pmid: 25873985
references.citation: BMC Med. 2013 Dec 04;11:254
references.pmid: 24305597
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 09;14:355
references.pmid: 25296687
references.citation: Breastfeed Med. 2013 Jun;8(3):286-90
references.pmid: 23323965
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 May;65(5):578-84
references.pmid: 18458209