title: Impact of nutrition and salinity changes on biological performances of green and white sturgeon.
abstract: Green and white sturgeon are species of high conservational and economic interest, particularly in the San Francisco Bay Delta (SFBD) for which significant climate change-derived alterations in salinity and nutritional patterns are forecasted. Although there is paucity of information, it is critical to test the network of biological responses underlying the capacity of animals to tolerate current environmental changes. Through nutrition and salinity challenges, climate change will likely have more physiological effect on young sturgeon stages, which in turn may affect growth performance. In this study, the two species were challenged in a multiple-factor experimental setting, first to levels of feeding rate, and then to salinity levels for different time periods. Data analysis included generalized additive models to select predictors of growth performance (measured by condition factor) among the environmental stressors considered and a suite of physiological variables. Using structural equation modeling, a path diagram is proposed to quantify the main linkages among nutrition status, salinity, osmoregulation variables, and growth performances. Three major trends were anticipated for the growth performance of green and white sturgeon in the juvenile stage in the SFBD: (i) a decrease in prey abundance will be highly detrimental for the growth of both species; (ii) an acute increase in salinity within the limits studied can be tolerated by both species but possibly the energy spent in osmoregulation may affect green sturgeon growth within the time window assessed; (iii) the mechanism of synergistic effects of nutrition and salinity changes will be more complex in green sturgeon, with condition factor responding nonlinearly to interactions of salinity and nutrition status or time of salinity exposure. Green sturgeon merits special scientific attention and conservation effort to offset the effects of feed restriction and salinity as key environmental stressors in the SFBD.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Pedro G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Vaz
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Ermias
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kebreab
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Silas S O
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Hung
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: James G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Fadel
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Seunghyung
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Nann A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Fangue
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D061006:Bays; D057231:Climate Change; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D005399:Fishes / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D054712:Salinity; D012495:San Francisco; D012623:Seawater; D013312:Stress, Physiological; D014882:Water-Electrolyte Balance
references.citation: Integr Comp Biol. 2013 Oct;53(4):597-608
references.pmid: 23615362
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2010 Jul 15;408(16):3176-88
references.pmid: 20435339
references.citation: Science. 2005 Mar 18;307(5716):1769-72
references.pmid: 15774757
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18561-5
references.pmid: 18000053
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2009 Aug;212(Pt 16):2579-94
references.pmid: 19648403
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Oct;8(10):361-7
references.pmid: 21236196
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2014 May-Jun;87(3):456-63
references.pmid: 24769709
references.citation: J Environ Biol. 2013 Sep;34(5):951-6
references.pmid: 24558811
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Mar 15;213(6):881-93
references.pmid: 20190113
references.citation: Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):1794-807
references.pmid: 24307662
references.citation: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1984 May;37 ( Pt 1):62-83
references.pmid: 6733054
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Mar 15;213(6):912-20
references.pmid: 20190116
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24465
references.pmid: 21957451
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 1998 Oct 15;282(3):290-300
references.pmid: 9755480
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Jul 29;466(7306):591-6
references.pmid: 20671703
references.citation: Physiol Biochem Zool. 2015 Jan-Feb;88(1):22-42
references.pmid: 25590591
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 2009 Apr;179(3):383-90
references.pmid: 19066909
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 2006 Jun;176(5):441-52
references.pmid: 16432730
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jan 5;315(5808):95-7
references.pmid: 17204649
references.citation: Science. 2008 Oct 31;322(5902):690-2
references.pmid: 18974339
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Aug;93(8):1809-15
references.pmid: 22928410
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2002 Dec;205(Pt 23):3699-706
references.pmid: 12409496
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 2009 Oct;179(7):903-20
references.pmid: 19517116
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2014 Jan 1;217(Pt 1):23-34
references.pmid: 24353201
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2002 Apr;57(1-2):51-64
references.pmid: 11879938
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 6;104(6):1745-50
references.pmid: 17264211
references.citation: Annu Rev Physiol. 2010;72:127-45
references.pmid: 20148670
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 2011 Dec;181(8):1045-62
references.pmid: 21630040