title: Parentage of overlapping offspring of an arboreal-breeding frog with no nest defense: implications for nest site selection and reproductive strategy.
abstract: Overlapping offspring occurs when eggs are laid in a nest containing offspring from earlier reproduction. Earlier studies showed that the parentage is not always obvious due to difficulties in field observation and/or alternative breeding tactics. To unveil the parentage between overlapping offspring and parents is critical in understanding oviposition site selection and the reproductive strategies of parents. Amplectant pairs of an arboreal-breeding frog, Kurixalus eiffingeri, lay eggs in tadpole-occupied nests where offspring of different life stages (embryos and tadpoles) coexist. We used five microsatellite DNA markers to assess the parentage between parents and overlapping offspring. We also tested the hypothesis that the male or female frog would breed in the same breeding site because of the scarcity of nest sites. Results showed varied parentage patterns, which may differ from the phenomenon of overlapping egg clutches reported earlier. Parentage analyses showed that only 58 and 25% of the tadpole-occupied stumps were reused by the same male and female respectively, partially confirming our prediction. Re-nesting by the same individual was more common in males than females, which is most likely related to the cost of tadpole feeding and/or feeding schemes of females. On the other hand, results of parentage analyses showed that about 42 and 75% of male and female respectively bred in tadpole-occupied stumps where tadpoles were genetically unrelated. Results of a nest-choice experiment revealed that 40% of frogs chose tadpole-occupied bamboo cups when we presented identical stumps, without or with tadpoles, suggesting that the habitat saturation hypothesis does not fully explain why frogs used the tadpole-occupied stumps. Several possible benefits of overlapping offspring with different life stages were proposed. Our study highlights the importance of integrating molecular data with field observations to better understand the reproductive biology and nest site selection of anuran amphibians.
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Wan-Ping
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Tung
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Yi-Huey
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Wei-Chun
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Cheng
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Ming-Feng
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Chuang
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Wan-Tso
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Hsu
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Science, Tunghai University, Taichung 407, Taiwan.
authors.forename: Yeong-Choy
authors.initials: YC
authors.lastname: Kam
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691, United States of America.
authors.forename: Richard M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Lehtinen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D009425:Nesting Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D010058:Oviposition; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology*; D016487:Parenting; D011898:Ranidae; D012098:Reproduction; D031787:Sasa; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D013624:Taiwan
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Feb 1;13(2):52-8
references.pmid: 21238200
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 2009 Sep;84(3):229-52
references.pmid: 19764282
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):379-84
references.pmid: 16701289
references.citation: Physiol Zool. 1998 Sep-Oct;71(5):534-40
references.pmid: 9754530
references.citation: Genetics. 2004 Apr;166(4):1963-79
references.pmid: 15126412
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Sep 16;431(7006):305-8
references.pmid: 15372032
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 Jan;142(2):316-25
references.pmid: 15503166
references.citation: Am Nat. 2004 Oct;164(4):517-30
references.pmid: 15459882
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1143-1152
references.pmid: 10877893
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106
references.pmid: 17305863
references.citation: Ethology. 2013 Jan 1;119(1):
references.pmid: 24415820
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639-55
references.pmid: 9633105
references.citation: J Hered. 2001 Mar-Apr;92(2):167-72
references.pmid: 11396575
references.citation: Science. 2002 Aug 16;297(5584):1168-70
references.pmid: 12183627
references.citation: Zoolog Sci. 2007 May;24(5):434-40
references.pmid: 17867842
references.citation: Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:19-45
references.pmid: 12429685
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):267-75
references.pmid: 23852187
references.citation: Neotrop Entomol. 2011 Jan-Feb;40(1):55-61
references.pmid: 21437483