title: Comparative analysis of prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in military and civilian communities in Abuja, Nigeria.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Intimate partner violence (IPV) occurs across the world, in various cultures, and affects people across societies irrespective of economic status or gender. Most data on IPV before World Health Organization multicountry study (WHOMCS) usually came from sources other than the military. Result of this study will contribute to the existing body of knowledge and may serve as a baseline for future studies in military populations. This study compares the prevalence of the different types of IPV against women in military and civilian communities in Abuja, Nigeria.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using a multistage sampling technique, 260 women who had intimate male partners were selected from military and civilian communities of Abuja. Collected data on personal characteristics and different types of IPV experienced were analyzed to demonstrate comparison of the association between the different forms of IPV and the respondents' sociodemographic and partner characteristics in the two study populations using percentages and χ-square statistics, and P-value was assumed to be significant at ≤0.05.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The prevalence of the four major types of IPV was higher among the military respondents than among civilians: controlling behavior, 37.1% versus 29.1%; emotional/psychological abuse, 42.4% versus 13.4%; physical abuse, 19.7% versus 5.9%, and sexual abuse, 9.2% versus 8.8%. Significantly more respondents from the military population (59 [45.4%]) compared to civilians (21 [19.4%]) were prevented by their partners from seeing their friends (P=0.000). The situation is reversed with regard to permission to seek health care for self, with civilians reporting a significantly higher prevalence (35 [32.4%]) than did military respondents (20 [15.4%]) (P=0.002). The military respondents were clearly at a higher risk of experiencing all the variants of emotional violence than the civilians (P=0.00). The commonest form of physical violence against women was "being slapped or having something thrown at them, that could hurt", which was markedly higher in the military (43 [33.1%]) than in the civilian population (10 [9.3%]), (P<0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IPV is a significant public health problem in Abuja, and the military population is clearly at a higher risk of experiencing all forms of IPV compared to the civilian population. The military should encourage and finance research on effect of military operations and posttraumatic stress disorders on family relationships with a view of developing evidence-based treatment models for military personnel.
authors.affiliation: Medical Department, Ministry of Defence Headquarters, Abuja, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Carol Uzoamaka
authors.initials: CU
authors.lastname: Chimah
authors.affiliation: Department of Community Medicine and PHC, Nnamdi Azikiwe University/Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Prosper Obunikem Uche
authors.initials: PO
authors.lastname: Adogu
authors.affiliation: Department of Community Health, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Kofoworola
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Odeyemi
authors.affiliation: Medical Department, Ministry of Defence Headquarters, Abuja, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Amobi Linus
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Ilika
keywords: Abuja; Nigeria; civilian; intimate partner violence; military; prevalence; women
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Apr;67(2):239-42
references.pmid: 10224734
references.citation: East Mediterr Health J. 2005 Sep-Nov;11(5-6):880-7
references.pmid: 16761657
references.citation: Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004 Dec;30(4):190-9
references.pmid: 15590385
references.citation: BJOG. 2003 Mar;110(3):272-5
references.pmid: 12628266
references.citation: Violence Against Women. 1995 Mar;1(1):6-31
references.pmid: 12346573
references.citation: Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 2:S232-8
references.pmid: 16884161
references.citation: J Interpers Violence. 2006 Sep;21(9):1156-68
references.pmid: 16893963
references.citation: Int Q Community Health Educ. 2005-2006;25(4):337-49
references.pmid: 17686706
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(9):1603-17
references.pmid: 12297246
references.citation: Violence Vict. 2002 Apr;17(2):169-85
references.pmid: 12033553
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2005 Aug;9(2):54-64
references.pmid: 16485586
references.citation: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993 May;41(2):159-64
references.pmid: 8099032
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2002 Dec;6(3):53-8
references.pmid: 12685409
references.citation: Violence Vict. 1994 Spring;9(1):63-77
references.pmid: 7826936
references.citation: Trauma Violence Abuse. 2006 Apr;7(2):93-108
references.pmid: 16534146
references.citation: Arch Iran Med. 2007 Jul;10(3):309-15
references.pmid: 17604466