title: Understanding the contribution of native tracheobronchial structure to lung function: CT assessment of airway morphology in never smokers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Computed tomographic (CT) airway lumen narrowing is associated with lower lung function. Although volumetric CT measures of airways (wall volume [WV] and lumen volume [LV]) compared to cross sectional measures can more accurately reflect bronchial morphology, data of their use in never smokers is scarce. We hypothesize that native tracheobronchial tree morphology as assessed by volumetric CT metrics play a significant role in determining lung function in normal subjects. We aimed to assess the relationships between airway size, the projected branching generation number (BGN) to reach airways of <2mm lumen diameter -the site for airflow obstruction in smokers- and measures of lung function including forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF 25-75).
  
  
  METHODS
  We assessed WV and LV of segmental and subsegmental airways from six bronchial paths as well as lung volume on CT scans from 106 never smokers. We calculated the lumen area ratio of the subsegmental to segmental airways and estimated the projected BGN to reach a <2mm-lumen-diameter airway assuming a dichotomized tracheobronchial tree model. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationships between airway size, BGN, FEF 25-75, and FEV1.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found that in models adjusted for demographics, LV and WV of segmental and subsegmental airways were directly related to FEV1 (P <0.05 for all the models). In adjusted models for age, sex, race, LV and lung volume or height, the projected BGN was directly associated with FEF 25-75 and FEV1 (P = 0.001) where subjects with lower FEV1 had fewer calculated branch generations between the subsegmental bronchus and small airways. There was no association between airway lumen area ratio and lung volume.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We conclude that in never smokers, those with smaller central airways had lower airflow and those with lower airflow had less parallel airway pathways independent of lung size. These findings suggest that variability in the structure of the tracheobronchial tree may influence the risk of developing clinically relevant smoking related airway obstruction.
authors.forename: Alejandro A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Diaz
authors.forename: Farbod N
authors.initials: FN
authors.lastname: Rahaghi
authors.forename: James C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Ross
authors.forename: Rola
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Harmouche
authors.forename: Juerg
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tschirren
authors.forename: Raul
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: San José Estépar
authors.forename: George R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Washko
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001980:Bronchi / Q000502:physiology*; D001995:Bronchography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008176:Lung Volume Measurements; D008297:Male; D008450:Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D012044:Regression Analysis; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014109:Total Lung Capacity; D014132:Trachea / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000502:physiology*; D014481:United States; D014797:Vital Capacity
references.citation: Science. 1962 Aug 24;137(3530):577-85
references.pmid: 14005590
references.citation: Eur Respir J. 1995 Mar;8(3):492-506
references.pmid: 7789503
references.citation: Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):987-96
references.pmid: 24928812
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun 15;173(12):1309-15
references.pmid: 16556695
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Mar;72(3):1016-23
references.pmid: 1568955
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):179-87
references.pmid: 9872837
references.citation: Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006 Aug;3(6):519-32
references.pmid: 16921136
references.citation: Comput Biol Med. 2006 Sep;36(9):974-96
references.pmid: 16076463
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Feb 12;427(6975):633-6
references.pmid: 14961120
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Nov;107(5):1622-8
references.pmid: 19762522
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;152(2):653-7
references.pmid: 7633722
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1926 Mar;12(3):207-14
references.pmid: 16576980
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 27;365(17):1567-75
references.pmid: 22029978
references.citation: Respir Med. 2012 Dec;106(12):1655-64
references.pmid: 22974831
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 15;187(4):342-6
references.pmid: 23418327
references.citation: Respir Med. 2010 Aug;104(8):1145-51
references.pmid: 20385477
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;152(3):1107-36
references.pmid: 7663792
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1968 Jun 20;278(25):1355-60
references.pmid: 5650164
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Aug 21-27;364(9435):709-21
references.pmid: 15325838
references.citation: J Anat. 2007 Nov;211(5):579-88
references.pmid: 17919291
references.citation: Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):687-93
references.pmid: 23460155
references.citation: Thorax. 2009 Apr;64(4):332-8
references.pmid: 19074932
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Nov;63(5):2042-7
references.pmid: 3693235
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Mar 15;116(6):668-73
references.pmid: 24436301
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct 1;180(7):588-97
references.pmid: 19608719
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):1102-8
references.pmid: 10988137
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan 15;171(2):142-6
references.pmid: 15516531
references.citation: J Appl Physiol. 1974 Jul;37(1):67-74
references.pmid: 4836570
references.citation: COPD. 2010 Feb;7(1):32-43
references.pmid: 20214461