title: The glycerol-dependent metabolic persistence of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 reflects the regulatory logic of the GlpR repressor.
abstract: The growth of the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440 on glycerol as the sole carbon source is characterized by a prolonged lag phase, not observed with other carbon substrates. We examined the bacterial growth in glycerol cultures while monitoring the metabolic activity of individual cells. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, as well as the analysis of the temporal start of growth in single-cell cultures, revealed that adoption of a glycerol-metabolizing regime was not the result of a gradual change in the whole population but rather reflected a time-dependent bimodal switch between metabolically inactive (i.e., nongrowing) and fully active (i.e., growing) bacteria. A transcriptional Φ(glpD-gfp) fusion (a proxy of the glycerol-3-phosphate [G3P] dehydrogenase activity) linked the macroscopic phenotype to the expression of the glp genes. Either deleting glpR (encoding the G3P-responsive transcriptional repressor that controls the expression of the glpFKRD gene cluster) or altering G3P formation (by overexpressing glpK, encoding glycerol kinase) abolished the bimodal glpD expression. These manipulations eliminated the stochastic growth start by shortening the otherwise long lag phase. Provision of glpR in trans restored the phenotypes lost in the ΔglpR mutant. The prolonged nongrowth regime of P. putida on glycerol could thus be traced to the regulatory device controlling the transcription of the glp genes. Since the physiological agonist of GlpR is G3P, the arrangement of metabolic and regulatory components at this checkpoint merges a positive feedback loop with a nonlinear transcriptional response, a layout fostering the observed time-dependent shift between two alternative physiological states.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Phenotypic variation is a widespread attribute of prokaryotes that leads, inter alia, to the emergence of persistent bacteria, i.e., live but nongrowing members within a genetically clonal population. Persistence allows a fraction of cells to avoid the killing caused by conditions or agents that destroy most growing bacteria (e.g., some antibiotics). Known molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomenon include genetic changes, epigenetic variations, and feedback-based multistability. We show that a prolonged nongrowing state of the bacterial population can be brought about by a distinct regulatory architecture of metabolic genes when cells face specific nutrients (e.g., glycerol). Pseudomonas putida may have adopted the resulting carbon source-dependent metabolic bet hedging as an advantageous trait for exploring new chemical and nutritional landscapes. Defeating such naturally occurring adaptive features of environmental bacteria is instrumental in improving the performance of these microorganisms as whole-cell catalysts in a bioreactor setup.
authors.affiliation: Systems and Synthetic Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: Pablo I
authors.initials: PI
authors.lastname: Nikel
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
authors.forename: Francisco J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Romero-Campero
authors.affiliation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Joshua A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Zeidman
authors.affiliation: Systems and Synthetic Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: Ángel
authors.initials: Á
authors.lastname: Goñi-Moreno
authors.affiliation: Systems and Synthetic Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain vdlorenzo@cnb.csic.es.
authors.forename: Víctor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: de Lorenzo
mesh_terms: D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism; D017353:Gene Deletion; D015870:Gene Expression; D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial; D005990:Glycerol / Q000378:metabolism*; D005994:Glycerophosphates / Q000378:metabolism; D016958:Pseudomonas putida / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism*; D012097:Repressor Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
chemical_list: D005994:Glycerophosphates; D012097:Repressor Proteins; D002244:Carbon; C029620:alpha-glycerophosphoric acid; D005990:Glycerol
references.citation: Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1622-5
references.pmid: 15308767
references.citation: Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2011;124:99-122
references.pmid: 21072695
references.citation: ISME J. 2013 Mar;7(3):465-7
references.pmid: 23178672
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2002 Dec;4(12):799-808
references.pmid: 12534463
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2014;10:736
references.pmid: 24987115
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D666-75
references.pmid: 23180763
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008 Jun;11(3):205-12
references.pmid: 18562243
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jan;39(1):96-119
references.pmid: 25227915
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;16(1):239-54
references.pmid: 23967821
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Aug;11(8):587-91
references.pmid: 24020075
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007 Jun;18(3):213-9
references.pmid: 17532205
references.citation: Gene. 1981 Dec;16(1-3):237-47
references.pmid: 6282695
references.citation: Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014 Oct 28;2:46
references.pmid: 25389526
references.citation: Res Microbiol. 1995 May;146(4):279-90
references.pmid: 7569322
references.citation: J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Aug;20(2):147-54
references.pmid: 3312141
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7427-32
references.pmid: 24799698
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1996 Sep;178(17):5215-21
references.pmid: 8752340
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:193-210
references.pmid: 18537474
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2014 Sep;93(6):1093-103
references.pmid: 24976172
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr;4(4):259-71
references.pmid: 16541134
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jan;15(1):93-110
references.pmid: 22646161
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013 Dec;5(6):883-91
references.pmid: 24249296
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1969 May 14;41(3):459-72
references.pmid: 4896022
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jan;16(1):291-303
references.pmid: 24148021
references.citation: Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:159
references.pmid: 25384394
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2011 Oct;13(10):2702-16
references.pmid: 21883790
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:634
references.pmid: 23340840
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;74(4):1124-35
references.pmid: 18156341
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 22;280(16):15921-7
references.pmid: 15705577
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1991 Nov;173(21):6798-806
references.pmid: 1938886
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1976;30:535-78
references.pmid: 825019
references.citation: MBio. 2012;3(2). pii: e00028-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00028-12
references.pmid: 22434849
references.citation: Microbiology. 1997 Apr;143 ( Pt 4):1287-97
references.pmid: 9141691
references.citation: Science. 2002 Aug 16;297(5584):1183-6
references.pmid: 12183631
references.citation: BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7:136
references.pmid: 24378036
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1994 Jun;176(11):3171-6
references.pmid: 8195070
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jun;15(6):1772-85
references.pmid: 23301697
references.citation: Biotechniques. 1990 May;8(5):528-35
references.pmid: 2357375
references.citation: Metab Eng. 2013 Jan;15:98-112
references.pmid: 23149123
references.citation: Nat Chem Biol. 2010 Oct;6(10):705-12
references.pmid: 20852608
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:357-72
references.pmid: 20528688
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1990 Nov;172(11):6557-67
references.pmid: 2172216
references.citation: Bioessays. 2011 Mar;33(3):215-23
references.pmid: 21254151
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jun;32(6):666-81
references.pmid: 19143988
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2014 Aug;12(8):e1001928
references.pmid: 25136970
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2010 Dec;192(23):6251-60
references.pmid: 20935102
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 May;12(5):368-79
references.pmid: 24736795
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;98(17):7559-68
references.pmid: 24878751
references.citation: Bioessays. 2014 Mar;36(3):226-35
references.pmid: 24419968
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2011 Mar;193(6):1427-35
references.pmid: 21239589
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004 Sep;68(3):538-59, table of contents
references.pmid: 15353569
references.citation: J Biotechnol. 2013 Jan 20;163(2):143-54
references.pmid: 22609234
references.citation: ISME J. 2008 Jul;2(7):696-706
references.pmid: 18607374
references.citation: Mol Biol (Mosk). 2003 Sep-Oct;37(5):843-9
references.pmid: 14593921
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011 Feb;22(1):26-31
references.pmid: 20934866
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D1183-9
references.pmid: 25392407
references.citation: Biosystems. 2008 Mar;91(3):438-57
references.pmid: 17822838
references.citation: Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2013 Jan 18;3:e201210019
references.pmid: 24688679
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 1984;38:359-88
references.pmid: 6388497
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2013 May 17;288(20):13929-35
references.pmid: 23592777
references.citation: EcoSal Plus. 2005 Nov;1(2):null
references.pmid: 26443506
references.citation: Biotechnol Adv. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):30-9
references.pmid: 18775486
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2012 Dec;14(12):3110-21
references.pmid: 23033921
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2008 May;190(9):3404-7
references.pmid: 18326580
references.citation: Science. 2008 Oct 17;322(5900):442-6
references.pmid: 18927393
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1971 Oct;108(1):82-8
references.pmid: 5001212
references.citation: MBio. 2014;5(5):e01611-14
references.pmid: 25161191
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;7(11):1686-97
references.pmid: 16232284
references.citation: Science. 2014 Feb 28;343(6174):1245114
references.pmid: 24436182
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2014 Mar;16(3):628-42
references.pmid: 24341371
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;34(4):554-87
references.pmid: 20337722
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2006 Aug;61(3):564-72
references.pmid: 16879639
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jan;77(1):67-72
references.pmid: 21075887
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Jun;6(6):451-64
references.pmid: 15883588
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Mar;67(3):479-90
references.pmid: 19159420
references.citation: Biotechnol J. 2014 Jan;9(1):61-72
references.pmid: 24408611
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1982 May;48(2):105-30
references.pmid: 6808915