title: Protein folding as a complex reaction: a two-component potential for the driving force of folding and its variation with folding scenario.
abstract: The Helmholtz decomposition of the vector field of probability fluxes in a two-dimensional space of collective variables makes it possible to introduce a potential for the driving force of protein folding [Chekmarev, J. Chem. Phys. 139 (2013) 145103]. The potential has two components: one component (Φ) is responsible for the source and sink of the folding flow, which represent, respectively, the unfolded and native state of the protein, and the other (Ψ) accounts for the flow vorticity inherently generated at the periphery of the flow field and provides the canalization of the flow between the source and sink. Both components obey Poisson's equations with the corresponding source/sink terms. In the present paper, we consider how the shape of the potential changes depending on the scenario of protein folding. To mimic protein folding dynamics projected onto a two-dimensional space of collective variables, the two-dimensional Müller and Brown potential is employed. Three characteristic scenarios are considered: a single pathway from the unfolded to the native state without intermediates, two parallel pathways without intermediates, and a single pathway with an off-pathway intermediate. To determine the probability fluxes, the hydrodynamic description of the folding reaction is used, in which the first-passage folding is viewed as a steady flow of the representative points of the protein from the unfolded to the native state. We show that despite the possible complexity of the folding process, the Φ-component is simple and universal in shape. The Ψ-component is more complex and reveals characteristic features of the process of folding. The present approach is potentially applicable to other complex reactions, for which the transition from the reactant to the product can be described in a space of two (collective) variables.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Thermophysics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia and Department of Physics, Novosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
authors.forename: Sergei F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Chekmarev
mesh_terms: D008956:Models, Chemical; D017510:Protein Folding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1996 Jun 17;76(25):4861-4864
references.pmid: 10061399
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):11746-51
references.pmid: 10518521
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Jul;25(7):331-9
references.pmid: 10871884
references.citation: Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2001;52:499-535
references.pmid: 11326073
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14766-70
references.pmid: 15466711
references.citation: Biophys J. 2005 Jan;88(1):172-83
references.pmid: 15501939
references.citation: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2006 Feb;16(1):71-8
references.pmid: 16413772
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 9;103(19):7298-303
references.pmid: 16648265
references.citation: J Am Chem Soc. 2006 May 10;128(18):6101-10
references.pmid: 16669679
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2005 Mar 24;109(11):5312-30
references.pmid: 16863198
references.citation: Science. 1991 Sep 20;253(5026):1386-93
references.pmid: 1716783
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2007 Mar 15;111(10):2675-87
references.pmid: 17315918
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2007 Sep 7;372(1):254-67
references.pmid: 17628591
references.citation: Proteins. 2008 Mar;70(4):1294-312
references.pmid: 17876828
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jan 11;100(1):018107
references.pmid: 18232827
references.citation: Annu Rev Biophys. 2008;37:289-316
references.pmid: 18573083
references.citation: Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2010;61:391-420
references.pmid: 18999998
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2009 Sep 24;113(38):12759-72
references.pmid: 19711956
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jan;83(1 Pt 1):011920
references.pmid: 21405726
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2011 Nov 10;115(44):13065-74
references.pmid: 21942785
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2012 Jun 14;116(23):6598-610
references.pmid: 22335541
references.citation: Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1042-6
references.pmid: 23180855
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2013 May 23;117(20):6092-105
references.pmid: 23621790
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 25;110(26):10628-33
references.pmid: 23754389
references.citation: Protein Sci. 2013 Nov;22(11):1459-65
references.pmid: 23963761
references.citation: J Chem Phys. 2013 Oct 14;139(14):145103
references.pmid: 24116649
references.citation: J Phys Chem B. 2014 Apr 24;118(16):4287-99
references.pmid: 24669953
references.citation: Biophys J. 2014 Apr 15;106(8):1729-40
references.pmid: 24739172
references.citation: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1998 Apr 20;37(7):868-893
references.pmid: 29711488
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):393-6
references.pmid: 7618103
references.citation: Biochemistry. 1994 May 17;33(19):5858-66
references.pmid: 8180214
references.citation: Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1997;48:545-600
references.pmid: 9348663
references.citation: Fold Des. 1998;3(4):R81-91
references.pmid: 9710577
references.citation: Proteins. 1998 Aug 1;32(2):136-58
references.pmid: 9714155
references.citation: Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1986 Jul 15;34(2):895-901
references.pmid: 9939701