title: Does Caspase-6 Have a Role in Perinatal Brain Injury?
abstract: Apoptotic mechanisms are centre stage for the development of injury in the immature brain, and caspases have been shown to play a pivotal role during brain development and in response to injury. The inhibition of caspases using broad-spectrum agents such as Q-VD-OPh is neuroprotective in the immature brain. Caspase-6, an effector caspase, has been widely researched in neurodevelopmental disorders and found to be important following adult stroke, but its function in the neonatal brain has yet to be detailed. Furthermore, caspases may be important in microglial activation; microglia are required for optimal brain development and following injury, and their close involvement during neuronal cell death suggests that apoptotic cues such as caspase activation may be important in microglial activation. Therefore, in this study we aimed to investigate the possible apoptotic and non-apoptotic functions caspase-6 may have in the immature brain in response to hypoxia-ischaemia. We examined whether caspases are involved in microglial activation. We assessed cleaved caspase-6 expression following hypoxia-ischaemia and conducted primary microglial cultures to assess whether the broad-spectrum inhibitor Q-VD-OPh or caspase-6 gene deletion affected lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated microglial activation and phenotype. We observed cleaved caspase-6 expression to be low but present in the cell body and cell processes in both a human case of white matter injury and 72 h following hypoxia-ischaemia in the rat. Gene deletion of caspase-6 did not affect the outcome of brain injury following mild (50 min) or severe (60 min) hypoxia-ischaemia. Interestingly, we did note that cleaved caspase-6 was co-localised with microglia that were not of apoptotic morphology. We observed that mRNA of a number of caspases was modulated by low-dose LPS stimulation of primary microglia. Q-VD-OPh treatment and caspase-6 gene deletion did not affect microglial activation but modified slightly the M2b phenotype response by changing the time course of SOCS3 expression after LPS administration. Our results suggest that the impact of active caspase-6 in the developing brain is subtle, and we believe there are predominantly other caspases (caspase-2, -3, -8, -9) that are essential for the cell death processes in the immature brain.
authors.affiliation: Perinatal Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
authors.forename: Ana A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Baburamani
authors.forename: Yasuka
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Miyakuni
authors.forename: Regina
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Vontell
authors.forename: Veena G
authors.initials: VG
authors.lastname: Supramaniam
authors.forename: Pernilla
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Svedin
authors.forename: Mary
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rutherford
authors.forename: Pierre
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gressens
authors.forename: Carina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Mallard
authors.forename: Satoru
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Takeda
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Thornton
authors.forename: Henrik
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hagberg
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn; D001921:Brain / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000209:etiology / Q000378:metabolism*; D053178:Caspase 6 / Q000378:metabolism*; D020925:Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain / Q000150:complications / Q000378:metabolism*; D051379:Mice; D018345:Mice, Knockout; D017628:Microglia / Q000378:metabolism*; D051381:Rats
chemical_list: D053178:Caspase 6
references.citation: Brain Behav Immun. 2010 Jul;24(5):776-83
references.pmid: 19903519
references.citation: Hum Mol Genet. 2012 May 1;21(9):1954-67
references.pmid: 22262731
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2011 Dec;34(12):646-56
references.pmid: 22018804
references.citation: Development. 1989 Feb;105(2):365-78
references.pmid: 2680424
references.citation: J Neurochem. 2007 Feb;100(4):1062-71
references.pmid: 17166174
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):5910-9
references.pmid: 12122053
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(5):781-9
references.pmid: 21674587
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2005;131(4):887-97
references.pmid: 15749343
references.citation: Apoptosis. 2003 Aug;8(4):345-52
references.pmid: 12815277
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13(2):217-32
references.pmid: 24457191
references.citation: Dev Neurosci. 2014;36(1):64-72
references.pmid: 24525800
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2000 Oct;7(10):984-93
references.pmid: 11279545
references.citation: Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001 Apr 18;89(1-2):133-46
references.pmid: 11311984
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2007 Apr;14(4):775-84
references.pmid: 17039248
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 14;27(7):1511-8
references.pmid: 17301159
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):8894-904
references.pmid: 21677173
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Feb 25;29(8):2588-96
references.pmid: 19244535
references.citation: Cell Death Dis. 2011 Sep 01;2:e203
references.pmid: 21881605
references.citation: Neurol Res Int. 2012;2012:506320
references.pmid: 22363841
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Dec 19;377(3):873-7
references.pmid: 18976637
references.citation: Free Radic Biol Med. 2006 Feb 1;40(3):388-97
references.pmid: 16443153
references.citation: Nat Med. 2000 Nov;6(11):1241-7
references.pmid: 11062535
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2006 Feb;13(2):285-92
references.pmid: 16123779
references.citation: Lancet Neurol. 2012 Jun;11(6):556-66
references.pmid: 22608669
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2005 Aug 26;280(34):30263-72
references.pmid: 15994297
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2009 Jul;16(7):1053-61
references.pmid: 19325570
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2002 Oct;9(10):1046-56
references.pmid: 12232792
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):981-9
references.pmid: 19225519
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e79313
references.pmid: 24265764
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Apr 21;472(7343):319-24
references.pmid: 21389984
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2014 May;21(5):696-706
references.pmid: 24413155
references.citation: Anal Biochem. 2009 Nov 1;394(1):68-74
references.pmid: 19595985
references.citation: Brain Pathol. 1999 Jan;9(1):93-117
references.pmid: 9989454
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Dec 5;32(49):17540-53
references.pmid: 23223278
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Apr;15(4):209-16
references.pmid: 24646669
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1981 Feb;9(2):131-41
references.pmid: 7235629
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30376
references.pmid: 22253931
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:1876
references.pmid: 23695670
references.citation: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2011;99:265-305
references.pmid: 21238939
references.citation: Brain Behav Immun. 2013 Aug;32:70-85
references.pmid: 23454862
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 1999 Aug 13;274(33):23426-36
references.pmid: 10438520
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2005 Feb;12(2):162-76
references.pmid: 15592434
references.citation: J Neurochem. 2011 Dec;119(5):901-8
references.pmid: 21951310
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 20;31(29):10494-505
references.pmid: 21775595
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2008 Feb;15(2):322-31
references.pmid: 17975551
references.citation: Cell Death Differ. 2007 Feb;14(2):387-91
references.pmid: 17008913
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 2014 Mar;124(3):1173-86
references.pmid: 24531553
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Mar;1793(3):592-601
references.pmid: 19133298
references.citation: J Immunol. 2011 Jan 1;186(1):403-10
references.pmid: 21098228
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 2008 May 1;86(6):1267-76
references.pmid: 18058945
references.citation: Dev Neurosci. 2013;35(2-3):130-9
references.pmid: 23548575
references.citation: Biol Neonate. 2001;79(3-4):172-9
references.pmid: 11275647