title: The entropic basis of collective behaviour.
abstract: We identify a unique viewpoint on the collective behaviour of intelligent agents. We first develop a highly general abstract model for the possible future lives these agents may encounter as a result of their decisions. In the context of these possibilities, we show that the causal entropic principle, whereby agents follow behavioural rules that maximize their entropy over all paths through the future, predicts many of the observed features of social interactions among both human and animal groups. Our results indicate that agents are often able to maximize their future path entropy by remaining cohesive as a group and that this cohesion leads to collectively intelligent outcomes that depend strongly on the distribution of the number of possible future paths. We derive social interaction rules that are consistent with maximum entropy group behaviour for both discrete and continuous decision spaces. Our analysis further predicts that social interactions are likely to be fundamentally based on Weber's law of response to proportional stimuli, supporting many studies that find a neurological basis for this stimulus-response mechanism and providing a novel basis for the common assumption of linearly additive 'social forces' in simulation studies of collective behaviour.
authors.affiliation: Professorship of Computational Social Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden mannr@ethz.ch.
authors.forename: Richard P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Mann
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: Roman
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Garnett
mesh_terms: D003198:Computer Simulation; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D019277:Entropy; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D000069550:Machine Learning; D015233:Models, Statistical
keywords: Galton–Watson process; Weber's law; causal entropic principle; collective behaviour; entropic forces; maximum entropy
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20141016
references.pmid: 24990682
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18720-5
references.pmid: 21795604
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 17;27(42):11192-200
references.pmid: 17942714
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002678
references.pmid: 23028277
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2002 Sep 7;218(1):1-11
references.pmid: 12297066
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6
references.pmid: 15690039
references.citation: Science. 2011 Dec 16;334(6062):1578-80
references.pmid: 22174256
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2013 Aug 6;10(85):20130466
references.pmid: 23782537
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jun 2;312(5778):1402-6
references.pmid: 16741126
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Aug 7;75(6):1226-1229
references.pmid: 10060237
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Oct;89(10):2700-11
references.pmid: 18959308
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Aug;80(2 Pt 1):021113
references.pmid: 19792083
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1995 May;51(5):4282-4286
references.pmid: 9963139
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002961
references.pmid: 23555206
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Apr 19;110(16):168702
references.pmid: 23679649
references.citation: Science. 2010 Oct 29;330(6004):686-8
references.pmid: 20929725
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Sep;19(9):453-5
references.pmid: 16701304
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Mar 27;109(13):4786-91
references.pmid: 22427355
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2002 Apr;8(2):111-21
references.pmid: 11954556
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 15;108(46):18726-31
references.pmid: 22065759
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2312-5
references.pmid: 21262802
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1957 May;64(3):153-81
references.pmid: 13441853
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Mar 26;110(13):5263-8
references.pmid: 23440218
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Nov;7(11):e1002282
references.pmid: 22125487
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):227-32
references.pmid: 22184210
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 25;18(22):1773-7
references.pmid: 19013067
references.citation: Science. 2006 Feb 10;311(5762):854-6
references.pmid: 16469928
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32411
references.pmid: 22412869
references.citation: Interface Focus. 2012 Dec 6;2(6):764-73
references.pmid: 23173077
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1232-7
references.pmid: 18227508
references.citation: J R Soc Interface. 2014 Jan 6;11(90):20130794
references.pmid: 24152812
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2003 Oct 21;224(4):451-7
references.pmid: 12957117
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20508-13
references.pmid: 23197836
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(7):e1002592
references.pmid: 22829756
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):145-147
references.pmid: 12691758
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Aug 21;283(1):35-43
references.pmid: 21570410
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 May 13;105(19):6948-53
references.pmid: 18474860