title: The Community College Effect Revisited: The Importance of Attending to Heterogeneity and Complex Counterfactuals.
abstract: Community colleges are controversial educational institutions, often said to simultaneously expand college opportunities and diminish baccalaureate attainment. We assess the seemingly contradictory functions of community colleges by attending to effect heterogeneity and to alternative counterfactual conditions. Using data on postsecondary outcomes of high school graduates of Chicago Public Schools, we find that enrolling at a community college penalizes more advantaged students who otherwise would have attended four-year colleges, particularly highly selective schools; however, these students represent a relatively small portion of the community college population, and these estimates are almost certainly biased. On the other hand, enrolling at a community college has a modest positive effect on bachelor's degree completion for disadvantaged students who otherwise would not have attended college; these students represent the majority of community college goers. We conclude that discussions among scholars, policymakers, and practitioners should move beyond considering the pros and cons of community college attendance for students in general to attending to the implications of community college attendance for targeted groups of students.
authors.affiliation: University of California-Los Angeles.
authors.forename: Jennie E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Brand
authors.affiliation: University of Michigan.
authors.forename: Fabian T
authors.initials: FT
authors.lastname: Pfeffer
authors.affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Goldrick-Rab
keywords: Chicago Public Schools; bachelor's degree; community college; heterogeneity
references.citation: Am Sociol Rev. 2010 Apr 1;75(2):273-302
references.pmid: 20454549
references.citation: Soc Forces. 2010 Dec;89(2):417-433
references.pmid: 22223924
references.citation: Sociol Methodol. 2012 Aug;42(1):314-347
references.pmid: 23482633
references.citation: Am Econ Rev. 2011 Oct;101(6):2754-2781
references.pmid: 25110355