title: The effect of cluster size variability on statistical power in cluster-randomized trials.
abstract: The frequency of cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) in peer-reviewed literature has increased exponentially over the past two decades. CRTs are a valuable tool for studying interventions that cannot be effectively implemented or randomized at the individual level. However, some aspects of the design and analysis of data from CRTs are more complex than those for individually randomized controlled trials. One of the key components to designing a successful CRT is calculating the proper sample size (i.e. number of clusters) needed to attain an acceptable level of statistical power. In order to do this, a researcher must make assumptions about the value of several variables, including a fixed mean cluster size. In practice, cluster size can often vary dramatically. Few studies account for the effect of cluster size variation when assessing the statistical power for a given trial. We conducted a simulation study to investigate how the statistical power of CRTs changes with variable cluster sizes. In general, we observed that increases in cluster size variability lead to a decrease in power.
authors.affiliation: Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Stephen A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Lauer
authors.affiliation: Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Ken P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Kleinman
authors.affiliation: Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Nicholas G
authors.initials: NG
authors.lastname: Reich
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D011381:Programming Languages; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D018401:Sample Size; D013223:Statistics as Topic
references.citation: Stat Med. 2001 Feb 15;20(3):377-90
references.pmid: 11180308
references.citation: BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):702-8
references.pmid: 15031246
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Dec;114(6):906-14
references.pmid: 7315838
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;35(5):1292-300
references.pmid: 16943232
references.citation: Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):2-19
references.pmid: 17136746
references.citation: Stat Med. 2007 Jun 15;26(13):2589-603
references.pmid: 17094074
references.citation: Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S52-7
references.pmid: 20473200
references.citation: Stat Med. 2010 Jun 30;29(14):1488-501
references.pmid: 20101669
references.citation: Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):27-36
references.pmid: 21163852
references.citation: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:102
references.pmid: 21718530
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35564
references.pmid: 22558168
references.citation: BMJ. 2012;345:e5661
references.pmid: 22951546