title: Soil microbial community variation correlates most strongly with plant species identity, followed by soil chemistry, spatial location and plant genus.
abstract: Soil ecologists have debated the relative importance of dispersal limitation and ecological factors in determining the structure of soil microbial communities. Recent evidence suggests that 'everything is not everywhere', and that microbial communities are influenced by both dispersal limitation and ecological factors. However, we still do not understand the relative explanatory power of spatial and ecological factors, including plant species identity and even plant relatedness, for different fractions of the soil microbial community (i.e. bacterial and fungal communities). To ask whether factors such as plant species, soil chemistry, spatial location and plant relatedness influence rhizosphere community composition, we examined field-collected rhizosphere soil of seven congener pairs that occur at Bodega Bay Marine Reserve, CA, USA. We characterized differences in bacterial and fungal communities using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Plant species identity was the single best statistical predictor of both bacterial and fungal community composition in the root zone. Soil microbial community structure was also correlated with soil chemistry. The third best predictor of bacterial and fungal communities was spatial location, confirming that everything is not everywhere. Variation in microbial community composition was also related to combinations of spatial location, soil chemistry and plant relatedness, suggesting that these factors do not act independently. Plant relatedness explained less of the variation than plant species, soil chemistry, or spatial location. Despite some congeners occupying different habitats and being spatially distant, rhizosphere fungal communities of plant congeners were more similar than expected by chance. Bacterial communities from the same samples were only weakly similar between plant congeners. Thus, plant relatedness might influence soil fungal, more than soil bacterial, community composition.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA jbm122@case.edu.
authors.forename: Jean H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Burns
authors.affiliation: University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Brian L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Anacker
authors.affiliation: University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Sharon Y
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Strauss
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA The Holden Arboretum, 9500 Sperry Road, Kirtland, OH 44094, USA.
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Burke
keywords: Coastal grassland community; niche; soil bacterial community; soil fungal community; terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2012 Jul;110(2):213-22
references.pmid: 22451600
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Aug;5(8):647-51
references.pmid: 17603517
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2014 Dec;17(12):1613-21
references.pmid: 25328022
references.citation: New Phytol. 2002 May;154(2):275-304
references.pmid: 33873429
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9
references.pmid: 21546353
references.citation: AoB Plants. 2014 Aug 27;6:
references.pmid: 25165062
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Feb;15(2):111-8
references.pmid: 22082078
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Aug;75(15):5111-20
references.pmid: 19502440
references.citation: New Phytol. 2011 Oct;192(2):518-28
references.pmid: 21668874
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Nov;148(3):1547-56
references.pmid: 18820082
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:233-66
references.pmid: 16669762
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89314
references.pmid: 24651264
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 26;109(52):21390-5
references.pmid: 23236140
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Apr;68(1):1-13
references.pmid: 19243436
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40467
references.pmid: 22808168
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2614-25
references.pmid: 17089669
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 29;108(13):5302-7
references.pmid: 21402914
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):1063-72
references.pmid: 19449700
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):301-2
references.pmid: 12538260
references.citation: Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1247-1262
references.pmid: 28565378
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Oct;21(20):5098-109
references.pmid: 22765763
references.citation: Evolution. 2003 Nov;57(11):2647-52
references.pmid: 14686540
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 17;103(3):626-31
references.pmid: 16407148
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20
references.pmid: 11674868
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Jun;182(4):919-928
references.pmid: 19383105
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2015 Feb;25(2):85-95
references.pmid: 24997550
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48946
references.pmid: 23145035
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Jul;15(7):689-95
references.pmid: 22507627
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):69-72
references.pmid: 11154299
references.citation: New Phytol. 2015 Feb;205(3):1071-1075
references.pmid: 25557183
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 2008 Oct;16(10):463-71
references.pmid: 18789693
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 19;5:113
references.pmid: 15318951
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 2004 Aug;12(8):386-93
references.pmid: 15276615
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Sep;11(9):980-92
references.pmid: 18522641
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):468-78
references.pmid: 20557974
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008 Aug;65(2):299-309
references.pmid: 18459969
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 May 30;9(6):549-51
references.pmid: 22669651
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
references.pmid: 15034147