title: Review and Synthesize Completed Research Through Systematic Review.
abstract: The evidence-based health care movement has generated new opportunity for scholars to generate synthesized sources of evidence. Systematic reviews are rigorous forms of synthesized evidence that scholars can conduct if they have requisite skills, time, and access to excellent library resources. Systematic reviews play an important role in synthesizing what is known and unknown about a particular health issue. Thus, they have a synergistic relationship with primary research. They can both inform clinical decisions when the evidence is adequate and identify gaps in knowledge to inform research priorities. Systematic reviews can be conducted of quantitative and qualitative evidence to answer many types of questions. They all share characteristics of rigor that arise from a priori protocol development, transparency, exhaustive searching, dual independent reviewers who critically appraise studies using standardized tools, rigor in synthesis, and peer review at multiple stages in the conduct and reporting of the systematic review.
authors.affiliation: Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN, USA ljhopp@purduecal.edu.
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Hopp
authors.affiliation: Purdue University Calumet, Hammond, IN, USA.
authors.forename: Leslie
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rittenmeyer
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D055318:Evidence-Based Nursing / Q000379:methods; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000379:methods; D012107:Research Design / Q000639:trends; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D000078202:Systematic Reviews as Topic
keywords: evidence-based practice; meta-aggregation; meta-analysis; review; systematic