title: Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs.
abstract: Internet-based health research is increasing, and often offers financial incentives but fraudulent behavior by participants can result. Specifically, eligible or ineligible individuals may enter the study multiple times and receive undeserved financial compensation. We review past experiences and approaches to this problem and propose several new strategies. Researchers can detect and prevent Internet research fraud in four broad ways: (1) through the questionnaire/instrument (e.g., including certain questions in survey; and software for administering survey); (2) through participants' non-questionnaire data and seeking external validation (e.g., checking data for same email addresses, usernames, passwords, and/or fake addresses or phone numbers; (3) through computer information, (e.g., IP addresses and cookies), and 4) through study design (e.g., avoid lump sum compensation and interviewing participants). These approaches each have pros and cons, and raise ethical, legal, and logistical questions, given that ethical tensions can emerge between preserving the integrity of research vs. protecting the privacy and confidentiality of study respondents. While past discussions concerning the ethics of online research have tended to focus on the participants' ability to trust the researchers, needs now arise to examine researchers' abilities to trust the participants. This analysis has several critical implications for future practice, policy, and research.
authors.affiliation: Research assistant for Dr. Robert Klitzman at Columbia University.
authors.forename: Jennifer E F
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Teitcher
authors.forename: Walter O
authors.initials: WO
authors.lastname: Bockting
authors.forename: José A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Bauermeister
authors.forename: Chris J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Hoefer
authors.forename: Michael H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Miner
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Klitzman
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D005607:Fraud; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D035842:Research Subjects
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2002;49(4):243-56
references.pmid: 12455331
references.citation: J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Sep;73(5):834-8
references.pmid: 22846248
references.citation: Field methods. 2012 Aug 1;24(3):272-291
references.pmid: 23180978
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 1;172(11):1292-8
references.pmid: 20880962
references.citation: AIDS Behav. 2008 Nov;12(6):964-73
references.pmid: 18240015
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):105-17
references.pmid: 14992637
references.citation: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):71-83
references.pmid: 21680978
references.citation: J Homosex. 2005;49(2):1-21
references.pmid: 16048891
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):157-61
references.pmid: 18166570
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):606-11
references.pmid: 24361235
references.citation: J Comput Mediat Commun. 2009 Apr;14(3):null
references.pmid: 24204104
references.citation: Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2012 May 1;30(2):202-211
references.pmid: 24031157
references.citation: AIDS. 2010 Aug 24;24(13):2099-107
references.pmid: 20601853
references.citation: AIDS Behav. 2007 Jul;11(4):505-21
references.pmid: 17053853
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):93-104
references.pmid: 14992636
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:803-32
references.pmid: 14744235