title: Assessing capacity in psychiatric patients with acute medical illness who refuse care.
abstract: Three cases are presented that demonstrate the difficulty of assessing medical decision-making capacity in patients with psychiatric illness who are refusing care. Health professionals often assess capacity differently in practice. Provided their patients have some understanding of their illness and have some plans for meeting basic needs, psychiatrists are often inclined to give patients the freedom to refuse care even if they do not exhibit a full understanding of the medical facts of their case and why they are refusing it. Adult medicine physicians, in contrast, are inclined to require patients to state a more complete understanding of the benefits and burdens of evaluation and treatment before allowing them to refuse care when their refusals might result in adverse medical outcomes. The 3 cases exemplify the tension between these approaches and highlight the role of hospital ethics consultation in addressing this conflict.
authors.affiliation: Medicine Residency Program, Natividad Medical Center, Salinas, California; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Tunzi); and McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, University of Texas-Houston (Dr Spike).
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tunzi
authors.affiliation: Medicine Residency Program, Natividad Medical Center, Salinas, California; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Tunzi); and McGovern Center for Humanities and Ethics, UTHealth, University of Texas-Houston (Dr Spike).
authors.forename: Jeffrey P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Spike
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2000 Mar;30(2):295-306
references.pmid: 10824650
references.citation: JAMA. 2006 Aug 9;296(6):691-5
references.pmid: 16896112
references.citation: Psychosomatics. 1997 May-Jun;38(3):239-45
references.pmid: 9136252
references.citation: JAMA. 2011 Jul 27;306(4):420-7
references.pmid: 21791691
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):121-8
references.pmid: 16192413
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Jan;14(1):27-34
references.pmid: 9893088
references.citation: J Clin Ethics. 1997 Fall;8(3):303-6
references.pmid: 9436088
references.citation: J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;6(3 Suppl):S100-4
references.pmid: 15890283
references.citation: Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2009 Apr;38(4):370-4
references.pmid: 19434342
references.citation: Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jul 15;64(2):299-306
references.pmid: 11476275
references.citation: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;36(4):392-7
references.pmid: 24698057
references.citation: Psychosomatics. 1995 Jan-Feb;36(1):33-41
references.pmid: 7871132
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;163(8):1323-34
references.pmid: 16877642
references.citation: Psychosomatics. 2003 May-Jun;44(3):237-43
references.pmid: 12724505
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 1995 Apr;19(2):149-74
references.pmid: 11660292