title: Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.
abstract: To confirm associations with a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), each with only a small effect size, as hypothesized in the polygenic theory for schizophrenia, the International Schizophrenia Consortium (2009, Nature 460:748-752) proposed a polygenic risk score (PRS) test and demonstrated its effectiveness when applied to psychiatric disorders. The basic idea of the PRS test is to use a half of the sample to select and up-weight those more likely to be associated SNPs, and then use the other half of the sample to test for aggregated effects of the selected SNPs. Intrigued by the novelty and increasing use of the PRS test, we aimed to evaluate and improve its performance for GWAS data. First, by an analysis of the PRS test, we point out its connection with the Sum test [Chapman and Whittaker, Genet Epidemiol 32:560-566; Pan, Genet Epidemiol 33:497-507]; given the known advantages and disadvantages of the Sum test, this connection motivated the development of several other polygenic tests, some of which may be more powerful than the PRS test under certain situations. Second, more importantly, to overcome the low statistical efficiency of the data-splitting strategy as adopted in the PRS test, we reformulate and thus modify the PRS test, obtaining several adaptive tests, which are closely related to the adaptive sum of powered score (SPU) test studied in the context of rare variant analysis [Pan et al., 2014, Genetics 197:1081-1095]. We use both simulated data and a real GWAS dataset of alcohol dependence to show dramatically improved power of the new tests over the PRS test; due to its superior performance and simplicity, we recommend the whole sample-based adaptive SPU test for polygenic testing. We hope to raise the awareness of the limitations of the PRS test and potential power gain of the adaptive SPU test.
authors.affiliation: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Pan
authors.forename: Yue-Ming
authors.initials: YM
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Peng
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wei
mesh_terms: D000437:Alcoholism / Q000235:genetics; D000465:Algorithms; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003198:Computer Simulation; D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study; D006801:Humans; D020412:Multifactorial Inheritance / Q000235:genetics*; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide / Q000235:genetics*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000208:ethnology / Q000235:genetics*
keywords: GWAS; SPU tests; SSU test; SSUw test; aSPU test; logistic regression; polygenic variation; sum test
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004
references.pmid: 11315092
references.citation: JAMA. 2004 Mar 10;291(10):1238-45
references.pmid: 15010446
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Jul;58(1):199-205
references.pmid: 5231600
references.citation: Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963-71
references.pmid: 7851788
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;27(4):415-28
references.pmid: 15481099
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Feb;38(2):209-13
references.pmid: 16415888
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;79(5):792-806
references.pmid: 17033957
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Feb;80(2):353-60
references.pmid: 17236140
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):661-78
references.pmid: 17554300
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
references.pmid: 17701901
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;81(5):927-38
references.pmid: 17924336
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;32(2):108-18
references.pmid: 17849491
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):386-97
references.pmid: 18252219
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;32(6):560-6
references.pmid: 18428428
references.citation: Genomics. 2008 Nov;92(5):265-72
references.pmid: 18722519
references.citation: Hum Genet. 2009 Jul;126(1):91-9
references.pmid: 19533172
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Aug 6;460(7256):748-52
references.pmid: 19571811
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;33(6):497-507
references.pmid: 19170135
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;34(3):275-85
references.pmid: 20088021
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5082-7
references.pmid: 20202923
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):929-42
references.pmid: 20560208
references.citation: Ann Hum Genet. 2011 Jan;75(1):36-45
references.pmid: 20384625
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Jul;35(5):381-8
references.pmid: 21520272
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;35(6):506-14
references.pmid: 21618606
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;35(7):606-19
references.pmid: 21769936
references.citation: BMC Med Genet. 2011;12:146
references.pmid: 22029572
references.citation: J Mol Neurosci. 2012 May;47(1):26-30
references.pmid: 21987052
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;36(1):3-16
references.pmid: 22161999
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46887
references.pmid: 23056513
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2013 Apr;45(4):400-5, 405e1-3
references.pmid: 23455638
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2013 Mar;9(3):e1003348
references.pmid: 23555274
references.citation: Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;19(1):41-9
references.pmid: 24166409
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2010;70(2):132-40
references.pmid: 20606458
references.citation: Hum Hered. 2010;70(2):109-31
references.pmid: 20610906
references.citation: Genetics. 2014 Aug;197(4):1081-95
references.pmid: 24831820
references.citation: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 May;35(4):211-6
references.pmid: 21308765