title: Effects of phylogenetic reconstruction method on the robustness of species delimitation using single-locus data.
abstract: Coalescent-based species delimitation methods combine population genetic and phylogenetic theory to provide an objective means for delineating evolutionarily significant units of diversity. The generalised mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC) and the Poisson tree process (PTP) are methods that use ultrametric (GMYC or PTP) or non-ultrametric (PTP) gene trees as input, intended for use mostly with single-locus data such as DNA barcodes. Here, we assess how robust the GMYC and PTP are to different phylogenetic reconstruction and branch smoothing methods. We reconstruct over 400 ultrametric trees using up to 30 different combinations of phylogenetic and smoothing methods and perform over 2000 separate species delimitation analyses across 16 empirical data sets. We then assess how variable diversity estimates are, in terms of richness and identity, with respect to species delimitation, phylogenetic and smoothing methods. The PTP method generally generates diversity estimates that are more robust to different phylogenetic methods. The GMYC is more sensitive, but provides consistent estimates for BEAST trees. The lower consistency of GMYC estimates is likely a result of differences among gene trees introduced by the smoothing step. Unresolved nodes (real anomalies or methodological artefacts) affect both GMYC and PTP estimates, but have a greater effect on GMYC estimates. Branch smoothing is a difficult step and perhaps an underappreciated source of bias that may be widespread among studies of diversity and diversification. Nevertheless, careful choice of phylogenetic method does produce equivalent PTP and GMYC diversity estimates. We recommend simultaneous use of the PTP model with any model-based gene tree (e.g. RAxML) and GMYC approaches with BEAST trees for obtaining species hypotheses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
authors.forename: Cuong Q
authors.initials: CQ
authors.lastname: Tang
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK ; Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Aelys M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Humphreys
authors.affiliation: National Research Council, Institute of Ecosystem Study 28922, Verbania Pallanza, Italy.
authors.forename: Diego
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Fontaneto
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
authors.forename: Timothy G
authors.initials: TG
authors.lastname: Barraclough
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
authors.forename: Emmanuel
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Paradis
keywords: DNA barcoding; GMYC; NGS; OTU; PTP; coalescent; metabarcoding; molecular dating; speciation; species delimitation
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:39-64
references.pmid: 19378139
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3678-86
references.pmid: 22764163
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):301-2
references.pmid: 12538260
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2009 Jun 23;5(3):425-8
references.pmid: 19369225
references.citation: Fly (Austin). 2009 Jan-Mar;3(1):10-4
references.pmid: 19556883
references.citation: Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):2901-16
references.pmid: 24975991
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2011 Feb;20(3):655-66
references.pmid: 21199026
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
references.pmid: 22357727
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12794-7
references.pmid: 19666622
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Jun;21(11):2671-91
references.pmid: 22494453
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references.pmid: 16928733
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Mar;11(2):261-77
references.pmid: 8170367
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 2;109(40):16208-12
references.pmid: 22988084
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2009 Jun;58(3):298-311
references.pmid: 20525585
references.citation: Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;5(10):1086-1094
references.pmid: 25821577
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2012 Apr;21(8):1864-77
references.pmid: 21883587
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):122-4
references.pmid: 12520286
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2009 Aug;58(4):439-42; discussion 442-4
references.pmid: 20525596
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 May;9 Suppl s1:42-50
references.pmid: 21564963
references.citation: Evolution. 2012 Aug;66(8):2577-86
references.pmid: 22834754
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Apr;5(4):e87
references.pmid: 17373857
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2007 Oct;56(5):741-52
references.pmid: 17886144
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e422
references.pmid: 16336051
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
references.pmid: 3447015
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
references.pmid: 11524383
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Nov 30;10:372
references.pmid: 21118572
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2010 Aug 31;8:114
references.pmid: 20807414
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014 Feb;33(2):359-69
references.pmid: 24399368
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21
references.pmid: 12614582
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 27;363(1506):2987-96
references.pmid: 18522916
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):347-55
references.pmid: 20702462
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
references.pmid: 17996036
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2010 Jan;59(1):59-73
references.pmid: 20525620
references.citation: Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
references.pmid: 18481363
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2006 Aug;55(4):595-609
references.pmid: 16967577
references.citation: Front Zool. 2007 Mar 07;4:8
references.pmid: 17343734
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19 Suppl 1:4-20
references.pmid: 20331766
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 18;107(20):9264-9
references.pmid: 20439743
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 15;29(22):2869-76
references.pmid: 23990417
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2013 Sep;62(5):707-24
references.pmid: 23681854
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references.pmid: 14734327
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 Oct;61(5):851-69
references.pmid: 22398121
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Oct 02;12:196
references.pmid: 23031350
references.citation: Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Sep;14(5):1049-59
references.pmid: 24655333
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21
references.pmid: 20525638