title: Bark ecology of twigs vs. main stems: functional traits across eighty-five species of angiosperms.
abstract: Although produced by meristems that are continuous along the stem length, marked differences in bark morphology and in microenvironment would suggest that main stem and twig bark might differ ecologically. Here, we examined: (1) how closely associated main stem and twig bark traits were, (2) how these associations varied across sites, and (3) used these associations to infer functional and ecological differences between twig and main stem bark. We measured density, water content, photosynthesis presence/absence, total, outer, inner, and relative thicknesses of main stem and twig bark from 85 species of angiosperms from six sites of contrasting precipitation, temperature, and fire regimes. Density and water content did not differ between main stems and twigs across species and sites. Species with thicker twig bark had disproportionately thicker main stem bark in most sites, but the slope and degree of association varied. Disproportionately thicker main stem bark for a given twig bark thickness in most fire-prone sites suggested stem protection near the ground. The savanna had the opposite trend, suggesting that selection also favors twig protection in these fire-prone habitats. A weak main stem-twig bark thickness association was observed in non fire-prone sites. The near-ubiquity of photosynthesis in twigs highlighted its likely ecological importance; variation in this activity was predicted by outer bark thickness in main stems. It seems that the ecology of twig bark can be generalized to main stem bark, but not for functions depending on the amount of bark, such as protection, storage, or photosynthesis.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, México DF, Mexico, julieta.rosell@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Julieta A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Rosell
authors.forename: Matiss
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Castorena
authors.forename: Claire A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Laws
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Westoby
mesh_terms: D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D005390:Fires; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D010788:Photosynthesis; D024301:Plant Bark / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D018547:Plant Stems / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology*; D013045:Species Specificity; D014197:Trees / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D014867:Water / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D014867:Water
references.citation: New Phytol. 2017 Jan;213(1):13-15
references.pmid: 27891644
references.citation: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):259-91
references.pmid: 16573844
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2002 Dec;53(379):2369-79
references.pmid: 12432029
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2006 Apr;29(4):632-46
references.pmid: 17080613
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2014 May;101(5):764-77
references.pmid: 24812111
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2010 Mar;97(3):519-24
references.pmid: 21622413
references.citation: Am J Bot. 1999 Apr;86(4):465-9
references.pmid: 10205065
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
references.pmid: 22930834
references.citation: Stain Technol. 1982 Sep;57(5):311-7
references.pmid: 7179333
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Feb;30(2):236-48
references.pmid: 17238914
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Nov;33(11):1949-58
references.pmid: 20561249
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2014 Dec;101(12):2183-8
references.pmid: 25480714
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2009 Apr;12(4):351-66
references.pmid: 19243406
references.citation: Physiol Plant. 2008 Dec;134(4):636-48
references.pmid: 19000198
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20
references.pmid: 11674868
references.citation: New Phytol. 2013 Jan;197(1):19-35
references.pmid: 23110592
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
references.pmid: 15103368
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Jun;93(6):1275-82
references.pmid: 22834368
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2002 Apr;89(4):147-62
references.pmid: 12061398
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan;155(1):515-23
references.pmid: 21078864
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2008 Apr;95(4):516-9
references.pmid: 21632377
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;177(1):17-32
references.pmid: 18028298
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references.pmid: 14734327
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 15;24(18):2098-100
references.pmid: 18678590
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;182(1):261-71
references.pmid: 19140949
references.citation: New Phytol. 2014 Jan;201(2):486-97
references.pmid: 24117609