title: So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Dallas, Texas.
authors.forename: Rod J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Rohrich
authors.forename: Aaron
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Weinstein
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D057189:Checklist; D035081:Editorial Policies; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000592:standards*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards; D058028:Research Report / Q000592:standards*; D013518:Surgery, Plastic
references.citation: Chan L, Heinemann AW, Roberts J. Elevating the quality of disability and rehabilitation research: Mandatory use of the reporting guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:415–417
references.citation: Simera I, Altman DG. Reporting medical research. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:710–716
references.citation: Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35621
references.citation: Freshwater MF. A plea to improve statistical analyses and methods in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1447–1448