title: Building and strengthening infrastructure for data exchange: lessons from the beacon communities.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The Beacon Community Cooperative Agreement Program supports interventions, including care-delivery innovations, provider performance measurement and feedback initiatives, and tools for providers and consumers to enhance care. Using a learning health system framework, we examine the Beacon Communities' processes in building and strengthening health IT (HIT) infrastructures, specifically successes and challenges in sharing patient information to improve clinical care.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  In 2010, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) launched the three-year program, which provided $250 million to 17 Beacon Communities to invest in HIT and health information exchange (HIE) infrastructure. Beacon Communities used this funding to develop and disseminate HIT-enabled quality improvement practices found effective in particular community and practice environments.
  
  
  METHODS
  NORC conducted 7 site visits, November 2012-March 2013, selecting Communities to represent diverse program features. From August-October 2013, NORC held discussions with the remaining 10 Communities. Following each visit or discussion, NORC summarized the information gathered, including transcripts, team observations, and other documents the Community provided, to facilitate a within-Community analysis of context and stakeholders, intervention strategies, enabling factors, and challenges.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Although each Community designed and implemented data-sharing strategies in a unique environment, similar challenges and enabling factors emerged across the Beacons. From a learning health system perspective, their strategies to build and strengthen data-sharing infrastructures address the following crosscutting priorities: promoting technical advances and innovations by helping providers adapt EHRs for data exchange and performance measurement with customizable IT and offering technical support to smaller, independent providers; engaging key stakeholders; and fostering transparent governance and stewardship of the infrastructure with neutral conveners.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  While all the Communities developed or strengthened data-exchange infrastructure, each did this in a unique environment of existing health care market and legal factors. The Communities, however, encountered similar challenges and enabling factors. Organizations undertaking collaborative data sharing, performance measurement and clinical transformation can learn from the Beacon Communities' experience.
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Gretchen W
authors.initials: GW
authors.lastname: Torres
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Swietek
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Petry S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Ubri
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Rachel F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Singer
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Kristina H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Lowell
authors.affiliation: NORC at the University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Wilhelmine
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Miller
keywords: Beacon Communities; data sharing; health information exchange
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1478-85
references.pmid: 23840052
references.citation: Am J Manag Care. 2011 Nov;17(11):761-8
references.pmid: 22084896
references.citation: Sci Transl Med. 2010 Nov 10;2(57):57cm29
references.pmid: 21068440
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):791-9
references.pmid: 23732712
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):666-71
references.pmid: 21576534
references.citation: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):288-94
references.pmid: 20442146
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1671-7
references.pmid: 20820025