title: Dressings and drains in posterior spine surgery and their effect on wound complications.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to systematically search, critically appraise and summarize published randomized control trials (RCT) and non-RCT examining the effect of drains and dressings on wound healing rates and complications in posterior spine surgery. The use of post-operative drains and the type of post-operative dressing is at the discretion of the treating surgeon with no available clinical guidelines. Drains will theoretically decrease incidence of post-operative hematoma and therefore, potentially decrease the risk of neurologic compromise when the neural elements have been exposed. Occlusive dressings have more recently been advocated, potentially maintaining a sterile barrier for longer time periods post-operatively. A systematic review of databases from 1969-2013 was undertaken. All papers examining drains in spine surgery and dressings in primary healing of surgical wounds were included. Revman (version 5.2; The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to test for overall treatment effect, clinical heterogeneity and risk of bias. Of the papers identified, 1348 examined post-operative drains in spine surgery and 979 wound dressings for primary wound healing of all surgical wounds. Seven studies were included for analysis for post-operative drains and 10 studies were analyzed for primary wound healing. The use of a post-operative drain did not influence healing rates and had no effect secondarily on infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-2.30). We were not able to establish whether surgical drains prevent hematomas causing neurologic compromise. There was a slight advantage to using occlusive dressings versus non-occlusive dressings in wound healing (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.44-3.02). Incisional vacuum dressings as both an occlusive barrier and superficial drainage system have shown promise for wounds at risk of dehiscence. There is a relatively high risk of bias in the methodology of many of the studies reviewed. We recommend favoring of occlusive dressings based on heterogeneous and potentially biased evidence. Drain use does not affect wound healing based on similar evidence. Incisional vacuum dressings have shown promise in managing potentially vulnerable wounds.
authors.affiliation: Dalhousie University, 1798 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada; Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: andrew_glennie@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Andrew Glennie
authors.affiliation: Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Dea
authors.affiliation: Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: John T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Street
mesh_terms: D001458:Bandages; D004322:Drainage / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013131:Spine / Q000601:surgery*; D013529:Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014945:Wound Healing
keywords: Drains; Dressings; Spine; Wounds