title: Use of plant woody species electrical potential for irrigation scheduling.
abstract: The electrical response of plants to environmental stimuli can be measured and quantitatively related to the intensity of several stimulating sources, like temperature, solar radiation, soil water content, evapotranspiration rates, sap flow and dendrometric cycles. These relations can be used to assess the influence of different environmental situations on soil water availability to plants, defined as a steady state condition between leaf transpirative flow and soil water flow to plant roots. A restricted soil water flow due to soil dryness can trigger water stress in plants, if the atmospheric evaporative demand is high, causing partial stomata closure as a physiological response to avoid plant dehydration; water stressed and unstressed plants manifest a differential electrical response. Real time plant electrical response measurements can anticipate actions that prevent the plant reaching actual stress conditions, optimizing stomata gas exchange and photosynthetic rates. An electrophysiological sensor developed in this work, allows remote real-time recording information on plant electrical potential (EP) in the field, which is highly related to EP measurements obtained with a laboratory Keithley voltmeter sensor used in an highly controlled experimental setup. Our electrophysiological sensor is a wireless, autonomous devise, which transmits EP information via Internet to a data server. Using both types of sensors (EP electrodes with a Keithley voltmeter and the electrophysiological sensor), we measured in real time the electrical responses of Persea americana and Prunus domestica plants, to induced water deficits. The differential response for 2 scenarios: irrigation and water restriction is identified by a progressive change in slope on the daily maximal and minimal electric signal values in stressed plants, and a zero-slope for similar signals for well-watered plants. Results show a correspondence between measured signals obtained by our electrophysiological sensor and the EP electrodes connected to the Keithley voltmeter in each irrigation stage. Also, both sensors show a daily cyclical signal (circadian cycle).
authors.affiliation: a Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile ; Santiago , Chile.
authors.forename: Liliana
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ríos-Rojas
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Morales-Moraga
authors.forename: José A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Alcalde
authors.forename: Luis A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Gurovich
mesh_terms: D057914:Agricultural Irrigation; D055724:Electrophysiological Phenomena; D004594:Electrophysiology / Q000295:instrumentation; D027421:Persea / Q000502:physiology*; D027861:Prunus / Q000502:physiology*; D014934:Wood / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: EP, electrical potential; Keithley voltmeter; Persea Americana; Prunus domestica; circadian cycle; electrical potential; electrophysiological sensor; plant water availability
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):264-72
references.pmid: 18487073
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Jan;5(1):34-41
references.pmid: 20592805
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2006 May;1(3):105-15
references.pmid: 19521490
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan 15;168(2):103-8
references.pmid: 20630616
references.citation: Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2005 Dec 14;51(7):607-19
references.pmid: 16359611
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Feb;7(2):282-4
references.pmid: 22353874
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Apr;32(4):319-26
references.pmid: 19054346
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jan;30(1):79-84
references.pmid: 17177878
references.citation: Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011 Jun;49(6):636-45
references.pmid: 21459591
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2011 Dec 21;291:47-55
references.pmid: 21959317
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2010 Mar;22(3):579-93
references.pmid: 20354199
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2014 Jun 15;171(10):799-806
references.pmid: 24877671
references.citation: Bioelectrochemistry. 2007 Nov;71(2):192-7
references.pmid: 17544342
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Mar;30(3):249-57
references.pmid: 17263772
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 May;14(5):187-92
references.pmid: 2475930
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2002 Feb;25(2):265-274
references.pmid: 11841669
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Aug;138(4):2200-9
references.pmid: 16040648
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2011 Jul;62(11):3885-94
references.pmid: 21447755
references.citation: J Plant Physiol. 2009 Feb 15;166(3):290-300
references.pmid: 18760501
references.citation: Tree Physiol. 2012 Jul;32(7):829-38
references.pmid: 22539636
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar;149(3):1593-600
references.pmid: 19129416
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Aug;11(8):413-9
references.pmid: 16843034
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(8):2361-77
references.pmid: 19351904
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2004 Nov;55(407):2365-84
references.pmid: 15475377
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Jun;6(6):840-2
references.pmid: 21558815
references.citation: Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jul 04;4:239
references.pmid: 23847642