title: Comparing a diffusion tensor and non-tensor approach to white matter fiber tractography in chronic stroke.
abstract: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based tractography has been used to demonstrate functionally relevant differences in white matter pathway status after stroke. However, it is now known that the tensor model is insensitive to the complex fiber architectures found in the vast majority of voxels in the human brain. The inability to resolve intra-voxel fiber orientations may have important implications for the utility of standard DTI-based tract reconstruction methods. Intra-voxel fiber orientations can now be identified using novel, tensor-free approaches. Constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) is one approach to characterize intra-voxel diffusion behavior. In the current study, we performed DTI- and CSD-based tract reconstruction of the corticospinal tract (CST) and corpus callosum (CC) to test the hypothesis that characterization of complex fiber orientations may improve the robustness of fiber tract reconstruction and increase the sensitivity to identify functionally relevant white matter abnormalities in individuals with chronic stroke. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 27 chronic post-stroke participants and 12 healthy controls. Transcallosal pathways and the CST bilaterally were reconstructed using DTI- and CSD-based tractography. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were calculated across the tracts of interest. The total number and volume of reconstructed tracts was also determined. Diffusion measures were compared between groups (Stroke, Control) and methods (CSD, DTI). The relationship between post-stroke motor behavior and diffusion measures was evaluated. Overall, CSD methods identified more tracts than the DTI-based approach for both CC and CST pathways. Mean FA, ADC, and RD differed between DTI and CSD for CC-mediated tracts. In these tracts, we discovered a difference in FA for the CC between stroke and healthy control groups using CSD but not DTI. CSD identified ipsilesional CST pathways in 9 stroke participants who did not have tracts identified with DTI. Additionally, CSD differentiated between stroke ipsilesional and healthy control non-dominant CST for several measures (number of tracts, tract volume, FA, ADC, and RD) whereas DTI only detected group differences for number of tracts. In the stroke group, motor behavior correlated with fewer diffusion metrics derived from the DTI as compared to CSD-reconstructed ipsilesional CST and CC. CSD is superior to DTI-based tractography in detecting differences in diffusion characteristics between the nondominant healthy control and ipsilesional CST. CSD measures of microstructure tissue properties related to more motor outcomes than DTI measures did. Our results suggest the potential utility and functional relevance of characterizing complex fiber organization using tensor-free diffusion modeling approaches to investigate white matter pathways in the brain after stroke.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Auriat
authors.affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Borich
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Snow
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: K P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Wadden
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Boyd
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D038524:Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D056324:Diffusion Tensor Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020521:Stroke / Q000473:pathology*; D066127:White Matter / Q000473:pathology*
keywords: Constrained spherical deconvolution; Diffusion tensor imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging; Motor outcome; Stroke
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34125
references.pmid: 22485157
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Nov;30(11):3461-74
references.pmid: 19370766
references.citation: Int Rehabil Med. 1987;8(4):166-70
references.pmid: 2440825
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2012;13:107
references.pmid: 22931454
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1336-49
references.pmid: 19319973
references.citation: Neurology. 2010 Sep 21;75(12):1048-54
references.pmid: 20855848
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jun 27;421(2):142-6
references.pmid: 17566651
references.citation: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;118(3-4):164-71
references.pmid: 1456101
references.citation: Brain. 2007 Jan;130(Pt 1):170-80
references.pmid: 17148468
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 15;42(2):617-25
references.pmid: 18583153
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Oct;28(8):751-60
references.pmid: 24519021
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15(1):23-30
references.pmid: 11527276
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2393-400
references.pmid: 21945470
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2008 Jan;62(1):97-103; discussion 103
references.pmid: 18300896
references.citation: Neurology. 2010 Jan 26;74(4):280-7
references.pmid: 20101033
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;93(11):1963-7
references.pmid: 22579647
references.citation: Neurology. 1997 Jul;49(1):113-9
references.pmid: 9222178
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2007 Oct 16;426(2):123-7
references.pmid: 17897782
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1654-63
references.pmid: 22287298
references.citation: Cortex. 2008 Sep;44(8):936-52
references.pmid: 18635164
references.citation: NeuroRehabilitation. 1998;10(2):131-42
references.pmid: 24525881
references.citation: J Magn Reson B. 1996 Jun;111(3):209-19
references.pmid: 8661285
references.citation: Neuroimage Clin. 2014;4:201-8
references.pmid: 24432247
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2011 Nov 21;505(3):238-41
references.pmid: 22027178
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;118(6):1367-77
references.pmid: 23540269
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2000 Oct;44(4):625-32
references.pmid: 11025519
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 May;33(5):1040-51
references.pmid: 21538700
references.citation: Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30(4):380-8
references.pmid: 20693793
references.citation: Neurology. 1990 Feb;40(2):332-9
references.pmid: 2405296
references.citation: Stroke. 2001 Jul;32(7):1635-9
references.pmid: 11441212
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Aug;31(7):1324-30
references.pmid: 20299434
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e44074
references.pmid: 22952880
references.citation: Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Nov;34(11):2747-66
references.pmid: 22611035
references.citation: J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;38(3):151-60
references.pmid: 23934017
references.citation: Neurobiol Aging. 2006 Dec;27(12):1827-33
references.pmid: 16310892
references.citation: NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(4):367-72
references.pmid: 21160127
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jun;65(6):1532-56
references.pmid: 21469191
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1572-80
references.pmid: 19744567
references.citation: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
references.pmid: 1135616
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48079
references.pmid: 23110177
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1999 Feb;45(2):265-9
references.pmid: 9989633
references.citation: Stroke. 1998 Nov;29(11):2268-76
references.pmid: 9804633
references.citation: Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2382-90
references.pmid: 10548675
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1429-36
references.pmid: 12414282
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(7-8):333-44
references.pmid: 8739270
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Jun;13(6 Pt 1):1174-85
references.pmid: 11352623
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;126(10):1959-71
references.pmid: 25631612
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;78(6):581-6
references.pmid: 17237143
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1459-72
references.pmid: 17379540
references.citation: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(3):275-84
references.pmid: 21357529
references.citation: Biophys J. 1994 Jan;66(1):259-67
references.pmid: 8130344
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Sep;24(3):549-55
references.pmid: 16888796