title: The Gap Detection Test: Can It Be Used to Diagnose Tinnitus?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Animals with induced tinnitus showed difficulties in detecting silent gaps in sounds, suggesting that the tinnitus percept may be filling the gap. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of this approach to detect tinnitus in human patients. The authors first hypothesized that gap detection would be impaired in patients with tinnitus, and second, that gap detection would be more impaired at frequencies close to the tinnitus frequency of the patient.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-two adults with bilateral tinnitus, 20 age-matched and hearing loss-matched subjects without tinnitus, and 10 young normal-hearing subjects participated in the study. To determine the characteristics of the tinnitus, subjects matched an external sound to their perceived tinnitus in pitch and loudness. To determine the minimum detectable gap, the gap threshold, an adaptive psychoacoustic test was performed three times by each subject. In this gap detection test, four different stimuli, with various frequencies and bandwidths, were presented at three intensity levels each.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Similar to previous reports of gap detection, increasing sensation level yielded shorter gap thresholds for all stimuli in all groups. Interestingly, the tinnitus group did not display elevated gap thresholds in any of the four stimuli. Moreover, visual inspection of the data revealed no relation between gap detection performance and perceived tinnitus pitch.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These findings show that tinnitus in humans has no effect on the ability to detect gaps in auditory stimuli. Thus, the testing procedure in its present form is not suitable for clinical detection of tinnitus in humans.
authors.affiliation: 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and 3Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hanze University Groningen, University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Kris
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Boyen
authors.forename: Deniz
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Başkent
authors.forename: Pim
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: van Dijk
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001307:Auditory Perception; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006320:Hearing Tests / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014012:Tinnitus / Q000175:diagnosis*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83845
references.pmid: 24386291
references.citation: Science. 1982 Nov 12;218(4573):688-90
references.pmid: 7134967
references.citation: Hear Res. 1984 Dec;16(3):251-60
references.pmid: 6401084
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2928-38
references.pmid: 22087921
references.citation: Hear Res. 1992 Dec;64(1):81-92
references.pmid: 1490904
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Jun 1;16(11):3775-89
references.pmid: 8642420
references.citation: Front Neurol. 2014 Oct 15;5:207
references.pmid: 25360130
references.citation: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Mar;2(1):54-64
references.pmid: 11545150
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:53-8
references.pmid: 14334243
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Jul;74(1):67-72
references.pmid: 6886200
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2000 Dec;62(6):583-631
references.pmid: 10880852
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):694-700
references.pmid: 1608262
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45123
references.pmid: 22984620
references.citation: Int J Audiol. 2012 Dec;51(12):900-5
references.pmid: 22957659
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982 Dec;96(6):945-54
references.pmid: 7153390
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1615-26
references.pmid: 10738815
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Sep;27(3):449-55
references.pmid: 6482414
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 1988 Mar;98(3):280-6
references.pmid: 2830445
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Feb;101(2):1044-9
references.pmid: 9035396
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1563-70
references.pmid: 8473610
references.citation: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1984 Mar;7(1):21-7
references.pmid: 6539313
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;111(3):552-64
references.pmid: 24198321
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3651-8
references.pmid: 18247772
references.citation: J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Jun;26(2):263-7
references.pmid: 6887813
references.citation: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):965-78
references.pmid: 15603455
references.citation: Noise Health. 2013 Nov-Dec;15(67):398-405
references.pmid: 24231418
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jun;117(6):3944-51
references.pmid: 16018496
references.citation: Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;36(2):383-8
references.pmid: 12856305
references.citation: Clin EEG Neurosci. 2008 Apr;39(2):69-72
references.pmid: 18450171
references.citation: Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:16-23
references.pmid: 22688322
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
references.pmid: 5541744
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2006 Feb;120(1):188-95
references.pmid: 16492129
references.citation: Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:150-60
references.pmid: 22728305
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Feb;119(2):1143-55
references.pmid: 16521775
references.citation: Br J Audiol. 1983 May;17(2):101-7
references.pmid: 6626779