title: Revitalizing traditional ecological knowledge: a study in an Alpine rural community.
abstract: This study aims to contribute to the debate on the value and the role of ecological knowledge in modern conservation strategies, with reference to the results of a case study conducted in the community of Montagne, located within a World Heritage site in the Italian Alps. This community is a paradigmatic example of the multiple transformations experienced by cultural landscapes in Alpine areas under the influence of global change. This study seeks to understand whether ecological knowledge is still in place in the community, and what the relationship is between the knowledge transmission and land use and social changes that have occurred in recent decades. To that end, the community is described by identifying the key variables (social, institutional, and ecological) that have historically shaped the landscape and the future priorities of the residents. Forest expansion, the most significant change in land use in the last 60 years, is analyzed using aerial photos; changes in biodiversity-related knowledge in the community are quantified by analyzing the inter-generational differences in plant species recognition. Results are discussed in the context of the current situation of the Montagne community, and the recommendation is made that policies and actions to promote traditional ecological knowledge protection or recovery in Europe be viewed as an important part of the recovery of community sovereignty and vitality. Lastly, concrete actions that can be implemented in our case study are proposed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Civil, Mechanical and Environmental Engineering, University of Trento, via Mesiano 77, 38100, Trento, Italy, elena.ianni@libero.it.
authors.forename: Elena
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ianni
authors.forename: Davide
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Geneletti
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ciolli
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D065928:Forests; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D019359:Knowledge; D012424:Rural Population
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Nov 23;7:38
references.pmid: 22112326
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2010 Jun;24(3):721-9
references.pmid: 20067484
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Jul 06;8:23
references.pmid: 22770375
references.citation: Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2013 Aug;41(4):null
references.pmid: 24244063
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37643
references.pmid: 22662184
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2011 Aug;48(2):334-49
references.pmid: 21644016
references.citation: J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Jan 30;145(2):517-29
references.pmid: 23220197
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Oct 15;3:33
references.pmid: 17937791
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2011 Feb;47(2):263-78
references.pmid: 21190021
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Jun 11;9:40
references.pmid: 23758714
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 10;104(15):6134-9
references.pmid: 17389376
references.citation: Learn Individ Differ. 2013 Oct 1;27:null
references.pmid: 24385712
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Nov 23;7:35
references.pmid: 22113005
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):875-9
references.pmid: 17531064
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Feb 15;42(4):1004-9
references.pmid: 18351064
references.citation: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2011 Nov 23;7:36
references.pmid: 22112242