title: Experimental shifts in intraclutch egg color variation do not affect egg rejection in a host of a non-egg-mimetic avian brood parasite.
abstract: Avian brood parasites lay their eggs in the nests of other birds, and impose the costs associated with rearing parasitic young onto these hosts. Many hosts of brood parasites defend against parasitism by removing foreign eggs from the nest. In systems where parasitic eggs mimic host eggs in coloration and patterning, extensive intraclutch variation in egg appearances may impair the host's ability to recognize and reject parasitic eggs, but experimental investigation of this effect has produced conflicting results. The cognitive mechanism by which hosts recognize parasitic eggs may vary across brood parasite hosts, and this may explain variation in experimental outcome across studies investigating egg rejection in hosts of egg-mimicking brood parasites. In contrast, for hosts of non-egg-mimetic parasites, intraclutch egg color variation is not predicted to co-vary with foreign egg rejection, irrespective of cognitive mechanism. Here we tested for effects of intraclutch egg color variation in a host of nonmimetic brood parasite by manipulating egg color in American robins (Turdus migratorius), hosts of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). We recorded robins' behavioral responses to simulated cowbird parasitism in nests where color variation was artificially enhanced or reduced. We also quantified egg color variation within and between unmanipulated robin clutches as perceived by robins themselves using spectrophotometric measures and avian visual modeling. In unmanipulated nests, egg color varied more between than within robin clutches. As predicted, however, manipulation of color variation did not affect rejection rates. Overall, our results best support the scenario wherein egg rejection is the outcome of selective pressure by a nonmimetic brood parasite, because robins are efficient rejecters of foreign eggs, irrespective of the color variation within their own clutch.
authors.affiliation: Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior Subprogram in Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Croston
authors.affiliation: Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior Subprogram in Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Psychology, Hunter College and The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Mark E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Hauber
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003116:Color; D005260:Female; D009425:Nesting Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology; D046109:Passeriformes / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D020308:Songbirds / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Front Zool. 2011 Jun 13;8:14
references.pmid: 21668974
references.citation: Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):199-205
references.pmid: 11913664
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 22;279(1731):1068-76
references.pmid: 21920975
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2007 Oct;10(4):377-86
references.pmid: 17279422
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2006 Jun 22;2(2):177-80
references.pmid: 17148357
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:2475
references.pmid: 24064931
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Jun 1;213(11):1976-83
references.pmid: 20472785
references.citation: Evolution. 1992 Apr;46(2):334-340
references.pmid: 28564028
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Jun;94(6):441-7
references.pmid: 17252240
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Apr 3;422(6931):495-9
references.pmid: 12673243
references.citation: J Morphol. 2010 Jun;271(6):697-704
references.pmid: 20058295
references.citation: Science. 1984 Jul 20;225(4659):337-40
references.pmid: 6740315
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2001 Oct;24(10):609-16
references.pmid: 11576676
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Apr;186(4):375-87
references.pmid: 10798725
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1996 May 22;263(1370):593-9
references.pmid: 8677259
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Aug 09;5(8):e12054
references.pmid: 20711258
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2013 Feb 4;23(3):260-4
references.pmid: 23333313
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):95-107
references.pmid: 11170700
references.citation: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013 Sep 1;67(9):1457-1469
references.pmid: 25013266
references.citation: Am Nat. 2012 May;179(5):633-48
references.pmid: 22504545
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 7;265(1394):351-8
references.pmid: 9523436
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 7;278(1724):3566-73
references.pmid: 21490019
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):515-7
references.pmid: 18593669
references.citation: Front Zool. 2014 Apr 28;11:34
references.pmid: 24834103
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Nov 20;281(1774):20132665
references.pmid: 24258721
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
references.pmid: 19185386
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2012 Jul;198(7):495-510
references.pmid: 22534772
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 13;102(50):18057-62
references.pmid: 16326805
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 May;29(5):291-300
references.pmid: 24726346
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Oct;159(4):473-9
references.pmid: 3783500