title: Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course.
abstract: One challenge that many neuroscience instructors face is how to teach students to communicate within the field. The goal of this project was to improve students' scientific writing in an introductory psychology laboratory course that serves as a feeder course into the neuroscience curriculum. This course included a scaffolded approach - breaking assignments into different sections that build upon each other to allow for more direction and feedback on each section. Students were also provided with examples of scientific writing, given direction on finding and reading journal articles, and were taught how to effectively peer review a paper. Research papers were assessed before (Year 1) and after (Year 2) this scaffolded approach was instituted. The assessment included measures of "Genre Knowledge" for each section of a research paper (abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion) as well as measures of "Writing Elements" (grammar, formatting, clarity, transitions, building to the hypothesis, using evidence). The results indicated that there was an improvement for Genre Knowledge scores when comparing Year 1 to Year 2. However, there was no systematic improvement in Writing Elements. This suggests that this teaching technique was most effective in improving students' ability to write within the scientific genre. The logistics of implementing such an approach are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303;
authors.forename: Sarah E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Holstein
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303; ; Program in Neuroscience, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303;
authors.forename: Katherine R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Mickley Steinmetz
authors.affiliation: Department of English, Wofford College, Spartanburg, SC 29303.
authors.forename: John D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Miles
keywords: genre knowledge; neuroscience; science writing; writing elements
references.citation: Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):154-72
references.pmid: 12669101
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2016 Feb-Mar;71(2):102-11
references.pmid: 26866986
references.citation: J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2011 Dec 01;12(2):157-65
references.pmid: 23653760
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Oct;21(10):1363-8
references.pmid: 20855902
references.citation: J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2013 May 06;14(1):66-77
references.pmid: 23858355
references.citation: CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):140-54
references.pmid: 17548876
references.citation: CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Spring;5(1):34-8
references.pmid: 17012188
references.citation: Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Mar;37(1):70-9
references.pmid: 23471252
references.citation: Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2011 May-Jun;39(3):196-203
references.pmid: 21618383
references.citation: CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Fall;5(3):218-26
references.pmid: 17012213
references.citation: J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2011 Oct 15;10(1):A50-7
references.pmid: 23626493
references.citation: CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Spring;11(1):39-46
references.pmid: 22383616
references.citation: J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2004 Fall;3(1):A4-8
references.pmid: 23493858
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1837-41
references.pmid: 23842955
references.citation: CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):524-35
references.pmid: 21123699