title: Seven Types of Ambiguity in Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Provision in Undergraduate Medicine Curricula.
abstract: Inclusion of the humanities in undergraduate medicine curricula remains controversial. Skeptics have placed the burden of proof of effectiveness upon the shoulders of advocates, but this may lead to pursuing measurement of the immeasurable, deflecting attention away from the more pressing task of defining what we mean by the humanities in medicine. While humanities input can offer a fundamental critical counterweight to a potentially reductive biomedical science education, a new wave of thinking suggests that the kinds of arts and humanities currently used in medical education are neither radical nor critical enough to have a deep effect on students' learning and may need to be reformulated. The humanities can certainly educate for tolerance of ambiguity as a basis to learning democratic habits for contemporary team-based clinical work. William Empson's 'seven types of ambiguity' model for analyzing poetry is transposed to medical education to: (a) formulate seven values proffered by the humanities for improving medical education; (b) offer seven ways of measuring impact of medical humanities provision, thereby reducing ambiguity; and
authors.affiliation: Graduate School, Academy for Innovation and Research (AIR), Falmouth University, Penryn Campus, Treliever Road, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK. alan.bleakley@falmouth.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bleakley
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D003479:Curriculum; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate; D006809:Humanities / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology
keywords: Ambiguity; Impact; Skepticism; Utilitarianism
references.citation: Med Educ. 2013 Feb;47(2):126-33
references.pmid: 23323651
references.citation: Med Teach. 2011;33(6):459-67
references.pmid: 21609175
references.citation: J Med Humanit. 2006 Winter;27(4):197-213
references.pmid: 17096192
references.citation: Acad Med. 2010 Jun;85(6):938-40
references.pmid: 20505388
references.citation: Med Educ. 2006 Mar;40(3):263-8
references.pmid: 16483329
references.citation: Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):799-800
references.pmid: 21715991
references.citation: J Med Humanit. 2008 Mar;29(1):1-4
references.pmid: 18064546
references.citation: Lancet. 2010 May 15;375(9727):1686-7
references.pmid: 20480942
references.citation: J Med Humanit. 2010 Dec;31(4):267-77
references.pmid: 20635126
references.citation: J R Soc Promot Health. 2006 May;126(3):116-20
references.pmid: 16739616
references.citation: Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):94-100
references.pmid: 20078760
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Feb;56(3):603-16
references.pmid: 12570977
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 May;(422):256-62
references.pmid: 15187865
references.citation: Med Educ. 2003 Jun;37(6):544-52
references.pmid: 12787378
references.citation: Acad Med. 2010 Jun;85(6):935-7
references.pmid: 20505387
references.citation: Med Educ. 2005 Oct;39(10):1056-65
references.pmid: 16178833
references.citation: Med Humanit. 2011 Jun;37(1):3-4
references.pmid: 21593242
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):991-7
references.pmid: 18612730
references.citation: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Nov;31(10):1767-8
references.pmid: 20413608
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jan;61(2):232-41
references.pmid: 18186914
references.citation: Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1138-44
references.pmid: 22722358
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):323-5
references.pmid: 9924065
references.citation: J Med Humanit. 2008 Mar;29(1):45-54
references.pmid: 18058208
references.citation: Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):996-1009
references.pmid: 21670661
references.citation: Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):801-2
references.pmid: 16304104
references.citation: Lancet. 1995 Oct 28;346(8983):1143-5
references.pmid: 7475609
references.citation: Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Winter;53(1):121-35
references.pmid: 20173300
references.citation: Med Humanit. 2011 Dec 1;37(2):85-90
references.pmid: 22114348
references.citation: Med Educ. 2007 Apr;41(4):395-401
references.pmid: 17430285
references.citation: Med Educ. 2012 Feb;46(2):153-62
references.pmid: 22239329
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Aug;16(4):849-55
references.pmid: 20659214
references.citation: Fam Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;23(7):531-3
references.pmid: 1936735
references.citation: Acad Med. 2010 Jun;85(6):988-98
references.pmid: 20505399
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1009-11
references.pmid: 16145021
references.citation: Med Educ. 2011 Feb;45(2):141-8
references.pmid: 21208260
references.citation: Mt Sinai J Med. 2009 Aug;76(4):372-80
references.pmid: 19642151
references.citation: Med Teach. 2010;32(5):360-7
references.pmid: 20423252
references.citation: Acad Med. 2010 Aug;85(8):1378-83
references.pmid: 20671464
references.citation: Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):221-9
references.pmid: 8259529
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Sep 2;149(5):334-41
references.pmid: 18765703
references.citation: Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):121-6
references.pmid: 22104059
references.citation: Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):350-8
references.pmid: 21248596
references.citation: Med Educ. 1998 Jan;32(1):3-7
references.pmid: 9624392
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(9):949-56
references.pmid: 6515428