title: Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Despite the prevalence of hysterectomy for treatment of benign gynecologic conditions, providers nationwide have been slow to adopt minimally-invasive surgical techniques. Our objective is to investigate the impact of a department for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) on the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy at an academic community hospital without robotic technology.
  
  
  METHODS
  This retrospective observational study included all patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2012. The primary outcome was route of hysterectomy: open, laparoscopic, or vaginal. Secondary outcomes of interest included length of stay and factors associated with an open procedure.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 2004, only 24 (8%) of the 292 hysterectomies performed for benign conditions at Newton-Wellesley Hospital (NWH) were laparoscopic. The rate increased to more than 50% (189/365) by 2008, and, in 2012, 72% (316/439) of hysterectomies were performed via a traditional laparoscopic approach. By 2012, more than 93% (411/439) of all hysterectomies were performed in a minimally invasive manner (including total laparoscopic hysterectomy [TLH], laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy [LSH], total vaginal hysterectomy [TVH], and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy [LAVH]). More than 85% of the hysterectomies at NWH in 2012 were outpatient procedures. By this time, the surgeon's preference or lack of expertise was rarely cited as a factor leading to open hysterectomy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A large diverse gynecologic surgery department transformed surgical practice from primarily open hysterectomy to a majority (>72%) performed via the traditional laparoscopic route and a large majority (>93%) performed in a minimally invasive manner in less than 8 years, without the use of robotic technology. This paradigm shift was fueled by patient demand and by MIGS department surgical mentorship for generalist obstetrician/gynecologists.
authors.affiliation: Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
authors.forename: Megan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Loring
authors.affiliation: Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
authors.forename: Stephanie N
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Morris
authors.affiliation: Center for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts.
authors.forename: Keith B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Isaacson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D008404:Massachusetts; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013038:Specialization; D013503:Surgery Department, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014591:Uterine Diseases / Q000601:surgery*
keywords: Benign hysterectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Minimally-invasive; Surgical mentorship
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):1-2
references.pmid: 24463655
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):499.e1-5
references.pmid: 21055514
references.citation: Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jan;289(1):101-5
references.pmid: 23839534
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158
references.pmid: 20168127
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):382.e1-9
references.pmid: 23107080
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):307.e1-8
references.pmid: 21272844
references.citation: Perm J. 2011 Fall;15(4):42-6
references.pmid: 22319415
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):20-5
references.pmid: 18262139
references.citation: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 Nov;10(4):481-3
references.pmid: 14738633
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):604-10
references.pmid: 23669274
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):167-75
references.pmid: 20226403
references.citation: JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98
references.pmid: 23423414
references.citation: JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24
references.pmid: 23484557
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24
references.pmid: 15904592
references.citation: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144(1):3-7
references.pmid: 19324491
references.citation: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Aug;11(3):359-64
references.pmid: 15559349
references.citation: JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):
references.pmid: 25392662
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):778-786
references.pmid: 24084534
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):1-3
references.pmid: 21059487
references.citation: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):656-61
references.pmid: 24462854
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5
references.pmid: 17978124
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1136-1141
references.pmid: 21508753
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048
references.pmid: 20168105