title: Women's status within the household as a determinant of maternal health care use in Nigeria.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although gender inequality is often cited as a barrier to improving maternal health in sub-saharan Africa, there is lack of empirical data on how women's socio-cultural characteristics may influence use of health services in Nigeria.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To describe how women's position in the household affects receipt of maternity care services.
  
  
  METHODS
  Secondary data analysis of 10,052 and 4,590 currently married women aged 15 to 49 years from the 2008 Nigerian DHS who receive skilled antenatal and delivery care at least till pregnancy was done.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Receipt of skilled delivery care was by 37.9% while, natal care was by 98.4%. Education, residence and wealth index all significantly influenced receipt of maternal health care. Women who were involved in decision making on their own health (aOR=1.97; 95%CI=1.88-2.06) and were employed throughout the year (aOR=1.11; 95%CI=1.01-1.23) were more likely to receive skilled antenatal care, while those who justified physical intimate partner violence were less likely to receive both skilled antenatal care (aOR=0.92; 95%CI=0.85-0.98) and delivery services (aOR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.87).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Interventions aimed at improving maternal care should promote women empowerment (decision making, self worth, educational and economic) and should involve partners.
authors.affiliation: Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Olufunmilayo I
authors.initials: OI
authors.lastname: Fawole
authors.affiliation: Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Ikeola A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Adeoye
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003469:Culture; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005195:Family Relations; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D054625:Healthcare Disparities; D006801:Humans; D008430:Maternal-Child Health Centers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009549:Nigeria; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013179:Spouse Abuse; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: gender inequality in Africa; physical intimate partner violence; skilled antenatal care; skilled delivery care; women's position; women's status
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Oct;24(4):463-75
references.pmid: 1429774
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:52
references.pmid: 23442536
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Jan;27(1):47-60
references.pmid: 7876295
references.citation: Stud Fam Plann. 1996 Nov-Dec;27(6):328-40
references.pmid: 8986031
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 1997 Apr;29(2):141-9
references.pmid: 9881126
references.citation: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jan;26(1):30-4
references.pmid: 16390706
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-74
references.pmid: 16581405
references.citation: Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006 Mar;32(1):17-27
references.pmid: 16723298
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Jun;20(3):409-19
references.pmid: 16469542
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 2010 May;42(3):341-58
references.pmid: 19951456
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2008 Aug;12(2):132-40
references.pmid: 20695048
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20776
references.pmid: 21677788
references.citation: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:55
references.pmid: 21798016
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2011 Jun;15(2):79-89
references.pmid: 22590895
references.citation: Afr Health Sci. 2012 Mar;12(1):32-40
references.pmid: 23066417
references.citation: Prev Med. 2012 Oct;55(4):341-5
references.pmid: 22846503
references.citation: BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:421
references.pmid: 22873658
references.citation: Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Sep;16(3):123-9
references.pmid: 23437506
references.citation: Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Mar-Apr;25(2):96-110
references.pmid: 8059449