title: Endoparasites in a Norwegian moose (Alces alces) population - Faunal diversity, abundance and body condition.
abstract: Many health surveillance programs for wild cervids do not include routine parasite screening despite evidence that gastrointestinal parasites can affect wildlife population dynamics by influencing host fecundity and survival. Slaughter weights of moose in some regions of Norway have been decreasing over recent decades but any role of parasites has not yet been considered. We investigated parasite faunal diversity of moose in Hedmark, SE Norway, by faecal analysis and identification of adult abomasal and caecal nematodes during the autumn hunting season. We related parasite prevalence and abundance to estimates of body condition, gender and age. We identified 11 parasite groups. Moose had high abomasal gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) burdens and all individuals were infected. Ostertagia antipini and Spiculopteragia alcis were the most prevalent abomasal GINs identified. O. leptospicularis and Telodorsagia circumcincta were also identified in the abomasa while a range of other GIN and Moniezia sp. eggs, and coccidia, Dictyocaulus sp. and Protostrongylid larvae were found in faeces. Female moose had higher mean abomasal nematode counts than males, particularly among adults. However, adult males had higher faecal egg counts than adult females which may reflect reduction in faecal volume with concentration of eggs among males during the rut. We found no strong evidence for the development of acquired immunity to abomasal nematodes with age, although there was a higher Protostrongylid and Moniezia infection prevalence in younger animals. High burdens of several parasites were associated with poor body condition in terms of slaughter weight relative to skeletal size but unrelated to visually evaluated fat reserves. Given findings from earlier experimental studies, our results imply sub-clinical effects of GI parasite infection on host condition. Managers should be aware that autumn faecal egg counts and field assessments of fat reserves may not be reliable indicators of parasitism and may underestimate impacts on wildlife populations.
authors.affiliation: Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Pb 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway.
authors.forename: Rebecca K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Davidson
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Hedmark University College, Evenstad, 2480 Koppang, Norway.
authors.forename: Tina
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ličina
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Hedmark University College, Evenstad, 2480 Koppang, Norway.
authors.forename: Lucrezia
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gorini
authors.affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK.
authors.forename: Jos M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Milner
keywords: Abomasum; Body condition; Cost of parasitism; Deer; Gastrointestinal parasite; Moose
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 1996 Aug-Sep;26(8-9):951-62
references.pmid: 8923142
references.citation: Parasitology. 1992 Dec;105 ( Pt 3):493-503
references.pmid: 1461688
references.citation: Parasite Immunol. 1995 Dec;17(12):643-52
references.pmid: 8834764
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2013 Jan;49(1):69-79
references.pmid: 23307373
references.citation: Acta Vet Scand. 2014 Oct 08;56:59
references.pmid: 25294401
references.citation: Parasitology. 2009 Feb;136(2):253-65
references.pmid: 19102793
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65972
references.pmid: 23776584
references.citation: Oecologia. 2011 Nov;167(3):635-46
references.pmid: 21607671
references.citation: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2014 Feb 21;3(2):198-208
references.pmid: 25180164
references.citation: Parasitology. 2006 Oct;133(Pt 4):465-75
references.pmid: 16817998
references.citation: Acta Vet Scand. 1971;12(1):36-68
references.pmid: 5103412
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2013 May 1;194(1):40-8
references.pmid: 23298563
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 7;269(1500):1625-32
references.pmid: 12184833
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 1996 Nov;26(11):1151-67
references.pmid: 9024860
references.citation: Res Vet Sci. 2011 Jun;90(3):451-6
references.pmid: 20667568
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Jul;152(4):655-64
references.pmid: 17401583
references.citation: J Parasitol. 2001 Oct;87(5):1054-7
references.pmid: 11695364
references.citation: J Parasitol. 2008 Oct;94(5):1031-7
references.pmid: 18576697
references.citation: Nature. 1989 Jan 19;337(6204):260-2
references.pmid: 2911365
references.citation: Int J Parasitol. 1999 Apr;29(4):567-79
references.pmid: 10428633
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2008 Oct 20;157(1-2):100-7
references.pmid: 18692964
references.citation: J Parasitol. 1997 Aug;83(4):575-83
references.pmid: 9267395
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 2010 Aug 4;171(3-4):293-9
references.pmid: 20466488
references.citation: Parasit Vectors. 2014 Dec 17;7:557
references.pmid: 25518921
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Oct;1026:187-94
references.pmid: 15604491
references.citation: Vet Parasitol. 1993 Feb;46(1-4):33-53
references.pmid: 8484224