title: Unpacking Self-Control.
abstract: Self-controlled behavior refers to actions aligned with valued, longer-term goals in the face of conflicting impulses to seek immediate gratification. In this article, we argue that the psychological processes that contribute to self-controlled behavior can be grouped into two functionally distinct categories: Volitional processes facilitate self-controlled behavior and include executive functions as well as learned metacognitive strategies like planning, attention deployment, and psychological distancing. In contrast, impulsigenic processes undermine self-controlled behavior and include reward sensitivity, sensation seeking, and domain-specific cravings. A disproportionate amount of research has addressed the former at the expense of understanding individual and developmental differences in the latter. This imbalance is now being rectified. Distinguishing between self-controlled behavior and its antecedent psychological processes helps illuminate normative developmental changes in self-control and points to directions for measurement and intervention.
authors.affiliation: University of Pennsylvania.
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Duckworth
authors.affiliation: Temple University.
authors.forename: Laurence
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Steinberg
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Dec;57(6):1041-50
references.pmid: 2614657
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):374-408
references.pmid: 24099400
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;4(2):162-76
references.pmid: 26158943
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):323-32
references.pmid: 23998675
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;39(7):843-55
references.pmid: 23813422
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14 (7):513-8
references.pmid: 23756633
references.citation: Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1032-9
references.pmid: 21728415
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;15(4):352-66
references.pmid: 21685152
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
references.pmid: 23020641
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):97-104
references.pmid: 17276131
references.citation: J Res Pers. 2011 Jun 1;45(3):259-268
references.pmid: 21643479
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2000 Mar;36(2):220-32
references.pmid: 10749079
references.citation: Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jul;88(1):22-9
references.pmid: 18614720
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2016 May;19(3):419-26
references.pmid: 25997842
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2013 Nov;16(6):879-93
references.pmid: 24118714
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 6;108(36):14998-5003
references.pmid: 21876169
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2012 Jun;23(6):582-8
references.pmid: 22547657
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2013 Dec;83(3):315-23
references.pmid: 24128659
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;106(1):3-19
references.pmid: 10197361
references.citation: Dev Rev. 2008 Mar;28(1):78-106
references.pmid: 18509515
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Jul;164(7):631-5
references.pmid: 20603463
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2013 Nov;49(11):2082-94
references.pmid: 23398553
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Jan;44(1):1-17
references.pmid: 24682958
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:313-9
references.pmid: 25149821