title: The inter-sample structural variability of regular tissue-engineered scaffolds significantly affects the micromechanical local cell environment.
abstract: Rapid prototyping techniques have been widely used in tissue engineering to fabricate scaffolds with controlled architecture. Despite the ability of these techniques to fabricate regular structures, the consistency with which these regular structures are produced throughout the scaffold and from one scaffold to another needs to be quantified. Small variations at the pore level can affect the local mechanical stimuli sensed by the cells thereby affecting the final tissue properties. Most studies assume rapid prototyping scaffolds as regular structures without quantifying the local mechanical stimuli at the cell level. In this study, a computational method using a micro-computed tomography-based scaffold geometry was developed to characterize the mechanical stimuli within a real scaffold at the pore level. Five samples from a commercial polycaprolactone scaffold were analysed and computational fluid dynamics analyses were created to compare local velocity and shear stress values at the same scaffold location. The five samples did not replicate the computer-aided design (CAD) scaffold and velocity and shear stress values were up to five times higher than the ones calculated in the CAD scaffold. In addition high variability among samples was found: at the same location velocity and shear stress values could be up to two times higher from sample to sample. This study shows that regular scaffolds need to be thoroughly analysed in order to quantify real cell mechanical stimuli so inspection methods should be included as part of the fabrication process.
authors.affiliation: INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, Department of Mechanical Engineering , University of Sheffield , Sheffield S1 3JD , UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Campos Marin
authors.affiliation: INSIGNEO Institute for in silico Medicine, Department of Mechanical Engineering , University of Sheffield , Sheffield S1 3JD , UK.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lacroix
keywords: computational fluid dynamics; fluid velocity; polycaprolactone scaffold; rapid prototyping; tissue engineering; wall shear stress
references.citation: Int J Med Robot. 2010 Mar;6(1):66-72
references.pmid: 20013824
references.citation: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2005;16(12 ):1595-610
references.pmid: 16366339
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Aug;90(2):894-906
references.pmid: 19360888
references.citation: Biotechnol Lett. 2011 Dec;33(12):2351-9
references.pmid: 21805363
references.citation: Nature. 2010 Sep 9;467(7312):167-73
references.pmid: 20829787
references.citation: Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2011 Jul;10(4):565-76
references.pmid: 20865437
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Feb 15;96(3):584-95
references.pmid: 16948169
references.citation: Lab Chip. 2012 Aug 7;12(15):2696-703
references.pmid: 22622237
references.citation: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Jan;20(1):229-34
references.pmid: 18758915
references.citation: Med Eng Phys. 2013 Sep;35(9):1298-312
references.pmid: 23473631
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2005 Jul;4(7):518-24
references.pmid: 16003400
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Nov;41(11):2367-80
references.pmid: 23807712
references.citation: J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Oct;16(10):2350-61
references.pmid: 22304383
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Aug;74(2):782-8
references.pmid: 15981173
references.citation: Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 May;42(5):1085-94
references.pmid: 24492950
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006 Feb 20;93(3):500-10
references.pmid: 16224789
references.citation: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Dec 15;87(4):1010-6
references.pmid: 18257081
references.citation: J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Nov;23(11):2671-8
references.pmid: 22990617
references.citation: J Biomech. 2005 Mar;38(3):543-9
references.pmid: 15652553
references.citation: Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91
references.pmid: 15860204
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Feb 27;9(2):e89966
references.pmid: 24587156
references.citation: Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011 May;108(5):1159-70
references.pmid: 21449028