title: Response of Prochlorococcus to varying CO2:O2 ratios.
abstract: Carbon fixation has a central role in determining cellular redox poise, increasingly understood to be a key parameter in cyanobacterial physiology. In the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus-the most abundant phototroph in the oligotrophic oceans-the carbon-concentrating mechanism is reduced to the bare essentials. Given the ability of Prochlorococcus populations to grow under a wide range of oxygen concentrations in the ocean, we wondered how carbon and oxygen physiology intersect in this minimal phototroph. Thus, we examined how CO2:O2 gas balance influenced growth and chlorophyll fluorescence in Prochlorococcus strain MED4. Under O2 limitation, per-cell chlorophyll fluorescence fell at all CO2 levels, but still permitted substantial growth at moderate and high CO2. Under CO2 limitation, we observed little growth at any O2 level, although per-cell chlorophyll fluorescence fell less sharply when O2 was available. We explored this pattern further by monitoring genome-wide transcription in cells shocked with acute limitation of CO2, O2 or both. O2 limitation produced much smaller transcriptional changes than the broad suppression seen under CO2 limitation and CO2/O2 co-limitation. Strikingly, both CO2 limitation conditions initially evoked a transcriptional response that resembled the pattern previously seen in high-light stress, but at later timepoints we observed O2-dependent recovery of photosynthesis-related transcripts. These results suggest that oxygen has a protective role in Prochlorococcus when carbon fixation is not a sufficient sink for light energy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Sarah C
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-3161
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Bagby
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.|Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Sallie W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Chisholm
mesh_terms: D002244:Carbon / Q000378:metabolism; D057486:Carbon Cycle / Q000502:physiology*; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000378:metabolism*; D002734:Chlorophyll / Q000502:physiology; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D010100:Oxygen / Q000378:metabolism*; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000502:physiology; D048929:Prochlorococcus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D002734:Chlorophyll; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D002244:Carbon; D010100:Oxygen
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2000 Aug;182(15):4268-77
references.pmid: 10894737
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2008;59(7):1441-61
references.pmid: 17578868
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8607-12
references.pmid: 16731626
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2008 Jun;23(3):187-99
references.pmid: 18487411
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):249-65
references.pmid: 16216846
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2009 Sep;191(17):5342-7
references.pmid: 19502405
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17765-9
references.pmid: 23071342
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Dec;27(5):559-92
references.pmid: 14638413
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 10;6:294
references.pmid: 16336691
references.citation: ISME J. 2013 Jan;7(1):184-98
references.pmid: 22895163
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Nov 4;105(44):17199-204
references.pmid: 18957552
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 15;103(33):12552-7
references.pmid: 16895994
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2001 Jan 5;276(1):306-14
references.pmid: 11024039
references.citation: mBio. 2012 May 02;3(2):
references.pmid: 22448042
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971 Nov 5;45(3):716-22
references.pmid: 4331471
references.citation: PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5135
references.pmid: 19352512
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 10;10:409
references.pmid: 20003283
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Mar;1777(3):269-76
references.pmid: 18241667
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:53
references.pmid: 17016519
references.citation: J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005 Aug;3(4):965-88
references.pmid: 16078370
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jun 9;268(5216):1480-2
references.pmid: 17843668
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):69-72
references.pmid: 19182781
references.citation: Trends Microbiol. 2007 Sep;15(9):398-407
references.pmid: 17693088
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010 Dec;2(6):728-38
references.pmid: 23766277
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2014 Dec;166(4):2205-17
references.pmid: 25315602
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000173
references.pmid: 18769676
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):3-13
references.pmid: 12448700
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11013-8
references.pmid: 15256601
references.citation: Science. 2006 Mar 24;311(5768):1768-70
references.pmid: 16556843
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 22;11:44
references.pmid: 20096119
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Oct 8;215(2):209-19
references.pmid: 12399037
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1997 Sep;179(18):5744-50
references.pmid: 9294430
references.citation: ISME J. 2011 Oct;5(10):1580-94
references.pmid: 21562599
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2007 Dec;3(12):e231
references.pmid: 18159947
references.citation: Funct Plant Biol. 2002 Apr;29(3):161-173
references.pmid: 32689463
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Feb 03;6(2):e16805
references.pmid: 21304826
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2002 May 24;277(21):18658-64
references.pmid: 11904298
references.citation: Front Microbiol. 2012 Aug 08;3:285
references.pmid: 23024637
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jun;27(2-3):215-37
references.pmid: 12829269
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 28;101(52):18228-33
references.pmid: 15596724
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2004 Nov;54(4):1022-35
references.pmid: 15522084
references.citation: PLoS One. 2008 Feb 27;3(2):e1584
references.pmid: 18301735
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Sep 6;449(7158):83-6
references.pmid: 17805294
references.citation: J Biol Chem. 2007 Jan 5;282(1):267-76
references.pmid: 17105726
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11280-4
references.pmid: 21690384
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2002 Aug;148(Pt 8):2405-2412
references.pmid: 12177334
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Mar;63(1):106-27
references.pmid: 10066832
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):185-93
references.pmid: 12538238
references.citation: Science. 2006 Mar 24;311(5768):1737-40
references.pmid: 16556835
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:333-359
references.pmid: 15012213
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2012 Feb;194(4):787-95
references.pmid: 22155772
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2006 Nov;188(22):7796-806
references.pmid: 16980454
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 19;100(17):10020-5
references.pmid: 12917486
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009 Jun;73(2):249-99
references.pmid: 19487728