title: Community psychology and the capabilities approach.
abstract: What makes for a good life? The capabilities approach to this question has much to offer community psychology, particularly with respect to marginalized groups. Capabilities are freedoms to engage in valued social activities and roles-what people can do and be given both their capacities, and environmental opportunities and constraints. Economist Amartya Sen's focus on freedoms and agency resonates with psychological calls for empowerment, and philosopher Martha Nussbaum's specification of requirements for a life that is fully human provides an important guide for social programs. Community psychology's focus on mediating structures has much to offer the capabilities approach. Parallels between capabilities, as enumerated by Nussbaum, and settings that foster positive youth development, as described in a National Research Council Report (Eccles and Gootman (Eds) in Community programs to promote youth development. National Academy Press, Washington, 2002) suggest extensions of the approach to children. Community psychologists can contribute to theory about ways to create and modify settings to enhance capabilities as well as empowerment and positive youth development. Finally, capabilities are difficult to measure, because they involve freedoms to choose but only choices actually made or enacted can be observed. The variation in activities or goals across members of a setting provides a measure of the capabilities that the setting fosters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, #90, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN, 37203-5721, USA, beth.shinn@vanderbilt.edu.
authors.forename: Marybeth
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Shinn
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001076:Aptitude; D006801:Humans; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012922:Social Change; D012935:Social Justice / Q000523:psychology; D062487:Social Marginalization / Q000523:psychology
references.citation: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014;84(1):95-109
references.pmid: 24826832
references.citation: Community Ment Health J. 1995 Apr;31(2):139-52
references.pmid: 7789122
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2004 Apr;94(4):651-6
references.pmid: 15054020
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):173-7
references.pmid: 2294438
references.citation: Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Apr;3(2):A42
references.pmid: 16539783
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 1992 Aug;20(4):523-47
references.pmid: 1481787
references.citation: Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2013 Oct;16(4):262-274
references.pmid: 24659925
references.citation: Community Ment Health J. 2004 Apr;40(2):133-50
references.pmid: 15206638
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Mar;41(1-2):4-21
references.pmid: 18175215
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 1981 Feb;9(1):1-25
references.pmid: 7223726
references.citation: JAMA. 1990 Feb 9;263(6):845-50
references.pmid: 2296146
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jul 13;158(13):1454-60
references.pmid: 9665356
references.citation: Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):463-9
references.pmid: 25639993
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Oct;23(5):631-56
references.pmid: 8851343
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 1991 Apr;19(2):251-78
references.pmid: 1867159
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Oct;29(5):725-46
references.pmid: 11594697
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(5):868-79
references.pmid: 17499900
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978 Aug;36(8):917-27
references.pmid: 690806