title: The role of professional knowledge in case-based reasoning in practical ethics.
abstract: The use of case-based reasoning in teaching professional ethics has come of age. The fields of medicine, engineering, and business all have incorporated ethics case studies into leading textbooks and journal articles, as well as undergraduate and graduate professional ethics courses. The most recent guidelines from the National Institutes of Health recognize case studies and face-to-face discussion as best practices to be included in training programs for the Responsible Conduct of Research. While there is a general consensus that case studies play a central role in the teaching of professional ethics, there is still much to be learned regarding how professionals learn ethics using case-based reasoning. Cases take many forms, and there are a variety of ways to write them and use them in teaching. This paper reports the results of a study designed to investigate one of the issues in teaching case-based ethics: the role of one's professional knowledge in learning methods of moral reasoning. Using a novel assessment instrument, we compared case studies written and analyzed by three groups of students whom we classified as: (1) Experts in a research domain in bioengineering. (2) Novices in a research domain in bioengineering. (3) The non-research group--students using an engineering domain in which they were interested but had no in-depth knowledge. This study demonstrates that a student's level of understanding of a professional knowledge domain plays a significant role in learning moral reasoning skills.
authors.affiliation: Department of Bioengineering, 302 Benedum Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15060, USA, Pinkus@pitt.edu.
authors.forename: Rosa Lynn
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Pinkus
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gloeckner
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fortunato
mesh_terms: D057005:Bioengineering / Q000941:ethics*; D003479:Curriculum; D004995:Ethics, Professional / Q000193:education*; D032984:Ethics, Research / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D007858:Learning; D013850:Thinking
references.citation: J Med Philos. 1991 Feb;16(1):29-51
references.pmid: 2010719
references.citation: Bioethics. 1993 Apr;7(2-3):200-6
references.pmid: 11651532
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Apr;11(2):257-76
references.pmid: 15915863
references.citation: J Med Humanit. 1995 Fall;16(3):189-200
references.pmid: 11654206
references.citation: Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Sep-Oct;21(5):14-6
references.pmid: 1743945
references.citation: Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Jun;21(3):789-807
references.pmid: 25820149
references.citation: Sci Technol Human Values. 1980 Fall;6(33):24-32
references.pmid: 11665127