title: Nationwide benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage multimetric indices: identifying inconsistencies and limitations in reporting stream impairment status, USA.
abstract: The objective of this study was to identify the current status of stream water-quality assessment and reporting methods for four states in the Ohio River basin (Indiana, Ohio, Tennessee, and Virginia), as required by the 305(b) section of the United States (US) Clean Water Act. Specifically, we clarified the discrepancies that exist among stream-impairment status classified by benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric indices (MMIs) and depicted using Geographic Information Systems shapefiles. In addition, we provided guidance in solving some of the comparability problems that arise when developing state-specific MMIs and depicting stream-impairment status using Geographic Information Systems technology. The MMI variation among states and differences in shapefile formats resulted in a nationwide dataset, which cannot be directly compared. Incorporating the changes suggested in this study allow for a uniform assessment and reporting method nationwide. Successful implementation of these changes would strengthen the US Environmental Protection Agency efforts to identify impaired streams and sources of those impairments without the limitations of state-by-state .developed assessment methods.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA, j.k.lau@ballstate.bsu.edu.
authors.forename: J K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Lau
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Lauer
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D040362:Geographic Information Systems; D007196:Indiana; D007448:Invertebrates; D009820:Ohio; D045483:Rivers; D013714:Tennessee; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014768:Virginia; D060753:Water Quality
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Jan;172(1-4):663-87
references.pmid: 20221800
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 1991 Feb;1(1):66-84
references.pmid: 27755684
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2011 Feb 1;409(5):941-8
references.pmid: 21167556
references.citation: J Environ Manage. 2010 Oct;91(10):1943-51
references.pmid: 20570037
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008 Jan;69(1):1-12
references.pmid: 17935784
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2003 May;31(5):656-69
references.pmid: 12719895
references.citation: Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Dec;159(1-4):311-30
references.pmid: 19067209
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2013 Jun 1;454-455:490-9
references.pmid: 23567169