title: Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task.
abstract: The asymmetric dominance effect (or decoy effect) is a form of context-dependent choice bias in which the probability of choosing one of two options is impacted by the introduction of a third option, also known as the decoy. Decoy effects are documented widely within the human consumer choice literature, and even extend to preference testing within nonhuman animals. Here, we extended this line of research to a perceptual discrimination task with rhesus monkeys to determine whether decoy stimuli would impact size judgments of rectangular stimuli. In a computerized task, monkeys attempted to choose the larger of two rectangles that varied in size and orientation (horizontally or vertically oriented). In probe trials, a third stimulus (the decoy) was presented that was smaller than the other two rectangles but matched the orientation of one of them. On half of the probe trials, the presented decoy matched the orientation of the larger stimulus, and on the other half, the decoy matched the orientation of the smaller stimulus. Monkeys rarely selected the decoy stimulus. However, their performance (selection of the largest rectangle) increased relative to the baseline trials (with only two choices) when the decoy was congruent in its orientation with the largest rectangle, but decreased relative to baseline when the decoy was incongruent with the largest rectangle. Thus, a decoy stimulus impacted monkeys' perceptual choice behavior even when it was not a viable choice option itself. These results are explained with regard to comparative evaluation mechanisms.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, Georgia, 30302-5010, audrey.parrish1@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Audrey E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Parrish
authors.forename: Theodore A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Beran
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008253:Macaca mulatta; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Cognition. 2012 Nov;125(2):131-40
references.pmid: 22883317
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Aug;21(4):986-94
references.pmid: 24408656
references.citation: Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):598-614
references.pmid: 24076537
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:236-42
references.pmid: 24412729
references.citation: J Genet Psychol. 1954 Sep;85(1):105-27
references.pmid: 13212007
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1990;22(2):127-31
references.pmid: 11537555
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):332-43
references.pmid: 16028587
references.citation: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2000 Mar;81(2):300-328
references.pmid: 10706818
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):127-36
references.pmid: 20838836
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2004 Dec;2(12):e402
references.pmid: 15550984
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):59-66
references.pmid: 10413541
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2013 Sep;16(5):829-38
references.pmid: 23443407
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 22;276(1673):3655-61
references.pmid: 19625319
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):458-75
references.pmid: 22889164
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):901-8
references.pmid: 23610134
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1965 Nov;72(6):407-18
references.pmid: 5852241
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2008 May;40(2):590-6
references.pmid: 18522071
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2012 Jul;38(3):233-43
references.pmid: 22545901
references.citation: Science. 1960 May 20;131(3412):1527-8
references.pmid: 17802497
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Aug;75(6):1243-51
references.pmid: 23709063