title: Phenotypic plasticity to light and nutrient availability alters functional trait ranking across eight perennial grassland species.
abstract: Functional traits are often used as species-specific mean trait values in comparative plant ecology or trait-based predictions of ecosystem processes, assuming that interspecific differences are greater than intraspecific trait variation and that trait-based ranking of species is consistent across environments. Although this assumption is increasingly challenged, there is a lack of knowledge regarding to what degree the extent of intraspecific trait variation in response to varying environmental conditions depends on the considered traits and the characteristics of the studied species to evaluate the consequences for trait-based species ranking. We studied functional traits of eight perennial grassland species classified into different functional groups (forbs vs. grasses) and varying in their inherent growth stature (tall vs. small) in a common garden experiment with different environments crossing three levels of nutrient availability and three levels of light availability over 4 months of treatment applications. Grasses and forbs differed in almost all above- and belowground traits, while trait differences related to growth stature were generally small. The traits showing the strongest responses to resource availability were similarly for grasses and forbs those associated with allocation and resource uptake. The strength of trait variation in response to varying resource availability differed among functional groups (grasses > forbs) and species of varying growth stature (small-statured > tall-statured species) in many aboveground traits, but only to a lower extent in belowground traits. These differential responses altered trait-based species ranking in many aboveground traits, such as specific leaf area, tissue nitrogen and carbon concentrations and above-belowground allocation (leaf area ratio and root : shoot ratio) at varying resource supply, while trait-based species ranking was more consistent in belowground traits. Our study shows that species grouping according to functional traits is valid, but trait-based species ranking depends on environmental conditions, thus limiting the applicability of species-specific mean trait values in ecological studies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research -UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120 Halle, Germany alrun.siebenkaes@ufz.de.
authors.forename: Alrun
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Siebenkäs
authors.affiliation: Institute of Stochastics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07743 Jena, Germany.
authors.forename: Jens
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schumacher
authors.affiliation: Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research -UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 4, 06120 Halle, Germany.
authors.forename: Christiane
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roscher
keywords: Above- and belowground traits; forbs; functional groups; functional traits; grasses; growth stature; light; nutrients; trait variation
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50
references.pmid: 22085245
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):187-91
references.pmid: 21236817
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Nov;5(11):360-4
references.pmid: 21232393
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2010 Oct;106(4):637-45
references.pmid: 20682576
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1337-45
references.pmid: 21948627
references.citation: New Phytol. 2003 Mar;157(3):617-631
references.pmid: 33873411
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):493-508
references.pmid: 15998401
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;170(2):357-68
references.pmid: 16608460
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1997 Dec;12(12):474-8
references.pmid: 21238163
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):244-52
references.pmid: 22244797
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2000 Mar;87(3):402-11
references.pmid: 10719001
references.citation: Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;3(4):1065-78
references.pmid: 23610644
references.citation: Oecologia. 1993 Dec;96(4):548-554
references.pmid: 28312461
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85
references.pmid: 16701083
references.citation: Evol Appl. 2012 Dec;5(8):850-7
references.pmid: 23346229
references.citation: New Phytol. 1987 Oct;107(2):403-414
references.pmid: 33873852
references.citation: New Phytol. 2001 Oct;152(1):69-83
references.pmid: 35974476
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2010 Jun;105(6):957-65
references.pmid: 20354073