title: The research capacity and culture of Australian podiatrists.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Best practice clinical health care is widely recognised to be founded on evidence based practice. Enhancing evidence based practice via the rapid translation of new evidence into every day clinical practice is fundamental to the success of health care and in turn health care professions. There is little known about the collective research capacity and culture of the podiatry profession across Australia. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the research capacity and culture of the podiatry profession within Australia and determine if there were any differences between podiatrists working in different health sectors and workplaces.
  
  
  METHODS
  All registered podiatrists were eligible to participate in a cross-sectional online survey. The Australian Podiatry Associations disseminated the survey and all podiatrists were encouraged to distribute it to colleagues. The Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool was used to collect all research capacity and culture item variables using a 10-point scale (1 = lowest; 10 = highest). Additional demographic, workplace and health sector data variables were also collected. Mann-Whitney-U, Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression analyses were used to determine any difference between health sectors and workplaces. Word cloud analysis was used for qualitative responses of individual motivators and barriers to research culture.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 232 fully completed surveys (6% of Australian registered podiatrists). Overall respondents reported low success or skills (Median rating < 4) on the majority of individual success or skill items. Podiatrists working in multi-practitioner workplaces reported higher individual success or skills in the majority of items compared with sole practitioners (p < 0.05). Non-clinical and public health sector podiatrists reported significantly higher post-graduate study enrolment or completion, research activity participation, provisions to undertake research and individual success or skill than those working privately.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study suggests that podiatrists in Australia report similar low levels of research success or skill to those reported in other allied health professions. The workplace setting and health sector seem to play key roles in self reported research success and skills. This is important knowledge for podiatrists and researchers aiming to translate research evidence into clinical practice.
authors.affiliation: Peninsula Health, Community Health, PO Box 52, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia ; Monash University, School of Physiotherapy, Frankston, VIC 3199 Australia.
authors.forename: Cylie M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.affiliation: School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059 Australia ; Allied Health Research Collaborative, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Queensland Health, Rode Rd, Brisbane, QLD 4032 Australia.
authors.forename: Peter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Lazzarini
keywords: Australia; Capacity; Culture; Podiatry; Research
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2008 Jun 27;9:37
references.pmid: 18588685
references.citation: J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:261-72
references.pmid: 21847348
references.citation: J Allied Health. 2004 Summer;33(2):132-8
references.pmid: 15239411
references.citation: J Allied Health. 2009 Winter;38(4):e107-11
references.pmid: 20011811
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Feb 13;2:4
references.pmid: 19216783
references.citation: Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):62-7
references.pmid: 22394664
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2010 Nov 16;7(11):e1001000
references.pmid: 21124816
references.citation: J R Soc Med. 2011 Jun;104(6):251-61
references.pmid: 21659400
references.citation: J Nurs Manag. 2008 Apr;16(3):315-26
references.pmid: 18324991
references.citation: Health Soc Care Community. 2009 May;17 (3):244-53
references.pmid: 19040697
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2
references.pmid: 8555924
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 19;13:144
references.pmid: 23597184
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Feb 09;7:8
references.pmid: 16466583
references.citation: J Allied Health. 2006 Fall;35(3):127-33
references.pmid: 17036666
references.citation: Aust Health Rev. 2015 Jun;39(3):312-4
references.pmid: 25774754
references.citation: J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012;5:53-9
references.pmid: 22396626
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:16
references.pmid: 22409832
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1992 Dec;35(11):1321-4
references.pmid: 1462171
references.citation: J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Jul;26 Suppl 1:180-7
references.pmid: 23577923
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Jan 09;6(1):1
references.pmid: 23302627
references.citation: Aust Occup Ther J. 2013 Aug;60(4):241-51
references.pmid: 23888974