title: Vagus nerve stimulation for partial seizures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulatory treatment that is used as an adjunctive therapy for treating people with medically refractory epilepsy. VNS consists of chronic intermittent electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve, delivered by a programmable pulse generator. The majority of people given a diagnosis of epilepsy have a good prognosis, and their seizures will be controlled by treatment with a single antiepileptic drug (AED), but up to 20%-30% of patients will develop drug-resistant epilepsy, often requiring treatment with combinations of AEDs. The aim of this systematic review was to overview the current evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of vagus nerve stimulation when used as an adjunctive treatment for people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review published in Issue 7, 2010.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine:(1) The effects on seizures of VNS compared to controls e.g. high-level stimulation compared to low-level stimulation (presumed sub-therapeutic dose); and(2) The adverse effect profile of VNS compared to controls e.g. high-level stimulation compared to low-level stimulation.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register (23 February 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 23 February 2015), MEDLINE (1946 to 23 February 2015), SCOPUS (1823 to 23 February 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov (23 February 2015) and ICTRP (23 February 2015). No language restrictions were imposed.
  
  
  METHODS
  The following study designs were eligible for inclusion: randomised, double-blind, parallel or crossover studies, controlled trials of VNS as add-on treatment comparing high and low stimulation paradigms (including three different stimulation paradigms - duty cycle: rapid, mid and slow) and VNS stimulation versus no stimulation or a different intervention. Eligible participants were adults or children with drug-resistant partial seizures not eligible for surgery or who failed surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. The following outcomes were assessed: (a) 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency; (b) treatment withdrawal (any reason); (c) adverse effects; (d) quality of life; (e) cognition; (f) mood. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat. Sensitivity best and worst case analyses were also undertaken to account for missing outcome data. Pooled Risk Ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) were estimated for the primary outcomes of seizure frequency and treatment withdrawal. For adverse effects, pooled RRs and 99% CI's were calculated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Five trials recruited a total of 439 participants and between them compared different types of VNS stimulation therapy. Baseline phase ranged from 4 to 12 weeks and double-blind treatment phases from 12 to 20 weeks in the five trials. Overall, two studies were rated as having a low risk of bias and three had an unclear risk of bias due to lack of reported information around study design. Effective blinding of studies of VNS is difficult due to the frequency of stimulation-related side effects such as voice alteration; this may limit the validity of the observed treatment effects. Four trials compared high frequency stimulation to low frequency stimulation and were included in quantitative syntheses (meta-analyses).The overall risk ratio (95% CI) for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency across all studies was 1.73 (1.13 to 2.64) showing that high frequency VNS was over one and a half times more effective than low frequency VNS. For this outcome, we rated the evidence as being moderate in quality due to incomplete outcome data in one included study; however results did not vary substantially and remained statistically significant for both the best and worst case scenarios. The risk ratio (RR) for treatment withdrawal was 2.56 (0.51 to 12.71), however evidence for this outcome was rated as low quality due to imprecision of the result and incomplete outcome data in one included study. The RR of adverse effects were as follows: (a) voice alteration and hoarseness 2.17 (99% CI 1.49 to 3.17); (b) cough 1.09 (99% CI 0.74 to 1.62); (c) dyspnea 2.45 (99% CI 1.07 to 5.60); (d) pain 1.01 (99% CI 0.60 to 1.68); (e) paresthesia 0.78 (99% CI 0.39 to 1.53); (f) nausea 0.89 (99% CI 0.42 to 1.90); (g) headache 0.90 (99% CI 0.48 to 1.69); evidence of adverse effects was rated as moderate to low quality due to imprecision of the result and/or incomplete outcome data in one included study. No important heterogeneity between studies was found for any of the outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  VNS for partial seizures appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment in 439 included participants from five trials. Results of the overall efficacy analysis show that VNS stimulation using the high stimulation paradigm was significantly better than low stimulation in reducing frequency of seizures. Results for the outcome "withdrawal of allocated treatment" suggest that VNS is well tolerated as withdrawals were rare. No significant difference was found in withdrawal rates between the high and low stimulation groups, however limited information was available from the evidence included in this review so important differences between high and low stimulation cannot be excluded . Adverse effects associated with implantation and stimulation were primarily hoarseness, cough, dyspnea, pain, paresthesia, nausea and headache, with hoarseness and dyspnea more likely to occur on high stimulation than low stimulation. However, the evidence on these outcomes is limited and of moderate to low quality. Further high quality research is needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of VNS for drug resistant partial seizures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Clinical Sciences Centre for Research and Education, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ.
authors.forename: Mariangela
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Panebianco
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rigby
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weston
authors.forename: Anthony G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Marson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004351:Drug Resistance; D004828:Epilepsies, Partial / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D014630:Vagus Nerve; D055536:Vagus Nerve Stimulation / Q000379:methods*
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:63-71
references.pmid: 24858008
references.citation: Neuroimmunomodulation. 2012;19(6):352-8
references.pmid: 23038102
references.citation: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995 Jun;49(3):S254-5
references.pmid: 8612162
references.citation: South Med J. 1997 May;90(5):484-8
references.pmid: 9160063
references.citation: Epilepsia. 2000 Sep;41(9):1195-200
references.pmid: 10999559
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 1993 Jan;78(1):26-31
references.pmid: 8416238
references.citation: Epilepsia. 1994 May-Jun;35(3):616-26
references.pmid: 8026408
references.citation: Epilepsia. 1998 Jul;39(7):677-86
references.pmid: 9670894
references.citation: Neurology. 1998 Jul;51(1):48-55
references.pmid: 9674777
references.citation: Epilepsy Res. 2003 Jun-Jul;55(1-2):59-70
references.pmid: 12948617
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD002896
references.pmid: 11869641
references.citation: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Sep;54(9):855-61
references.pmid: 22540141
references.citation: Seizure. 2009 Jan;18(1):34-7
references.pmid: 18657451
references.citation: Arch Neurol. 1996 Nov;53(11):1176-80
references.pmid: 8912492
references.citation: Epilepsy Res. 1995 Mar;20(3):221-7
references.pmid: 7796794
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;116(9):2026-36
references.pmid: 16055378
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Oct;15(10 Pt 2):1557-71
references.pmid: 1383970
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Sep;18(5):408-14
references.pmid: 11709645
references.citation: Epilepsia. 1975 Mar;16(1):1-66
references.pmid: 804401
references.citation: J Neurol Sci. 2009 Sep 15;284(1-2):96-102
references.pmid: 19427651
references.citation: Epilepsy Res. 1994 Jun;18(2):149-54
references.pmid: 7957037
references.citation: J Neurosci Nurs. 1993 Dec;25(6):362-6
references.pmid: 8106830
references.citation: Neurology. 2005 Jul 26;65(2):317-9
references.pmid: 16043810
references.citation: Seizure. 2005 Oct;14(7):504-13
references.pmid: 16176878
references.citation: Neuromodulation. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):551-6; discussion 556
references.pmid: 23738578
references.citation: Seizure. 2013 Jan;22(1):9-13
references.pmid: 23041031
references.citation: Epilepsia. 1994 May-Jun;35(3):637-43
references.pmid: 8026410
references.citation: Epilepsy Res. 2000 Dec;42(2-3):203-10
references.pmid: 11074193
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Nov;25(5):713-28
references.pmid: 11682255
references.citation: Neurology. 1995 Feb;45(2):224-30
references.pmid: 7854516
references.citation: Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Aug;37:133-8
references.pmid: 25022821
references.citation: Neurology. 1993 Jul;43(7):1338-45
references.pmid: 8327135
references.citation: Neurology. 2000 Mar 14;54(5):1179-82
references.pmid: 10720294
references.citation: Neurology. 2013 Oct 15;81(16):1453-9
references.pmid: 23986299
references.citation: Epilepsy Behav. 2001 Feb;2(1):46-53
references.pmid: 12609181
references.citation: Neurology. 1999 Nov 10;53(8):1731-5
references.pmid: 10563620
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Feb 15;340:c365
references.pmid: 20156912
references.citation: Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Sep;28(3):374-8
references.pmid: 23835092
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 1998 Dec;43(6):1265-76; discussion 1276-80
references.pmid: 9848840
references.citation: Epilepsia. 2010 Jul;51 Suppl 3:98-101
references.pmid: 20618411
references.citation: Eur J Neurol. 2005 Apr;12(4):245-53
references.pmid: 15804240
references.citation: Can J Neurol Sci. 1997 Aug;24(3):222-5
references.pmid: 9276107
references.citation: Lancet. 1995 Jul 15;346(8968):140-4
references.pmid: 7603228
references.citation: Epilepsia. 2006 Mar;47(3):556-62
references.pmid: 16529621
references.citation: Epilepsia. 1994 May-Jun;35(3):627-36
references.pmid: 8026409
references.citation: Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3(Suppl 4):S255-9
references.pmid: 23230530
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 3;342(5):314-9
references.pmid: 10660394