title: Improved tibial component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was introduced in an attempt to reduce positional outliers of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It was hypothesized that PSI could help with the positioning of tibial components in optimal rotational alignment.
  
  
  METHODS
  A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 58 patients following TKA was conducted. Of these, 30 operations were performed using PSI and 28 using conventional instrumentation. The rotation of the tibial components was determined in MRI using three different reference lines: a tangent to the dorsal tibial condyles, the tibial epicondylar line, and the tibial tubercle. Deviations >9° were considered outliers. Also internal rotation >1° was considered an outlier. Data were analyzed statistically for positional outliers using the Chi-squared test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability with low standard deviations for the determination of tibial component rotation using the tangent to the dorsal condyles and the tibial epicondylar line as reference. Using the dorsal tangent as reference, there were eight components in excessive external rotation (28.6 %) and one component being in relative internal rotation (5.4°) in the conventional group, while there were two components in excessive external rotation in the PSI group (6.7 %). Using the tibial epicondyles as reference, there were seven components in excessive external rotation (21.4 %) and one component being in relative internal rotation (4.4°) in the conventional group; while there were two components in excessive external rotation in the PSI group (6.7 %). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Measurements based on the tibial tubercle showed poor reproducibility in terms of intra- and interobserver reliability and was of little use in the context of the research question.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this setup, PSI was effective in significantly reducing outliers of optimal rotational tibial component alignment during TKA. Anatomy of the proximal tibia does not deliver clear landmarks that are prominent and consistent. This makes both, MRI analysis as well as cutting jig production and intraoperative placement a challenge.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043, Marburg, Germany, heyse@med.uni-marburg.de.
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Heyse
authors.forename: Carsten O
authors.initials: CO
authors.lastname: Tibesku
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000601:surgery; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012399:Rotation; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000601:surgery