title: A matter of context: Casey and the constitutionality of compelled physician speech.
abstract: Under the Supreme Court's compelled speech cases, the context of government-mandated disclosures determines the standard of review. Pursuant to Casey, Zauderer, and Whalen, compelled disclosures in the medical context, such as speech-and-display ultrasound laws, are subject to - and survive - a form of rational basis scrutiny.
authors.affiliation: Jennings Professor of Law at Elon University School of Law.
authors.forename: Scott W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Gaylord
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D030881:Disclosure; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010820:Physicians / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011247:Pregnancy; D014481:United States