title: Evaluation of Lactococcus lactis Isolates from Nondairy Sources with Potential Dairy Applications Reveals Extensive Phenotype-Genotype Disparity and Implications for a Revised Species.
abstract: Lactococcus lactis is predominantly associated with dairy fermentations, but evidence suggests that the domesticated organism originated from a plant niche. L. lactis possesses an unusual taxonomic structure whereby strain phenotypes and genotypes often do not correlate, which in turn has led to confusion in L. lactis classification. A bank of L. lactis strains was isolated from various nondairy niches (grass, vegetables, and bovine rumen) and was further characterized on the basis of key technological traits, including growth in milk and key enzyme activities. Phenotypic analysis revealed all strains from nondairy sources to possess an L. lactis subsp. lactis phenotype (lactis phenotype); however, seven of these strains possessed an L. lactis subsp. cremoris genotype (cremoris genotype), determined by two separate PCR assays. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) showed that strains with lactis and cremoris genotypes clustered together regardless of habitat, but it highlighted the increased diversity that exists among "wild" strains. Calculation of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and tetranucleotide frequency correlation coefficients (TETRA), using the JSpecies software tool, revealed that L. lactis subsp. cremoris and L. lactis subsp. lactis differ in ANI values by ∼14%, below the threshold set for species circumscription. Further analysis of strain TIFN3 and strains from nonindustrial backgrounds revealed TETRA values of <0.99 in addition to ANI values of <95%, implicating that these two groups are separate species. These findings suggest the requirement for a revision of L. lactis taxonomy.
authors.affiliation: Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland Department of Microbiology, University College Cork, County Cork, Ireland.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cavanagh
authors.affiliation: Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland Department of Biological Sciences, Cork Institute of Technology, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland.
authors.forename: Aidan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Casey
authors.affiliation: Animal Nutrition and Health, AgResearch Ltd., Palmerston North, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Altermann
authors.affiliation: Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
authors.forename: Paul D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Cotter
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology, University College Cork, County Cork, Ireland.
authors.forename: Gerald F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Fitzgerald
authors.affiliation: Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland olivia.mcauliffe@teagasc.ie.
authors.forename: Olivia
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: McAuliffe
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D014644:Genetic Variation; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D005838:Genotype; D013294:Lactococcus lactis / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000502:physiology; D008892:Milk / Q000382:microbiology; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D058885:Multilocus Sequence Typing; D010641:Phenotype; D006109:Poaceae / Q000382:microbiology*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA; D014675:Vegetables / Q000382:microbiology*
chemical_list: D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Apr;64(3):396-402
references.pmid: 14624315
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Jan 15;90(2):139-59
references.pmid: 14698096
references.citation: Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996 Jul;46(3):664-8
references.pmid: 8782673
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Apr;8(4):251-9
references.pmid: 20190823
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(19):6671-7
references.pmid: 15375152
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb 17;172:57-61
references.pmid: 24361833
references.citation: OMICS. 2003 Summer;7(2):161-9
references.pmid: 14506845
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(2):353-61
references.pmid: 12147085
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Dec;58(12):4045-7
references.pmid: 16348830
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Feb;63(2):414-9
references.pmid: 9023921
references.citation: Microbiology (Reading). 2002 Nov;148(Pt 11):3332-3333
references.pmid: 12427924
references.citation: J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Aug;101(2):396-405
references.pmid: 16882147
references.citation: Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:729-44
references.pmid: 20847124
references.citation: Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2003 Oct;2(4):166-189
references.pmid: 33451230
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2014 May;97(5):2633-45
references.pmid: 24612812
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 May;57(5):1313-8
references.pmid: 1713027
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Apr 29;146(3):263-75
references.pmid: 21435733
references.citation: Genome Inform. 2009 Oct;23(1):205-11
references.pmid: 20180275
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1230-1
references.pmid: 11751234
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Sep;77(18):6451-62
references.pmid: 21803914
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001 Jan;25(1):39-67
references.pmid: 11152940
references.citation: Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:561-88
references.pmid: 16774461
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jun;79(11):3476-84
references.pmid: 23542625
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 08;9:75
references.pmid: 18261238
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Aug;77(15):5324-35
references.pmid: 21666023
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Dec;63(3):296-304
references.pmid: 15935495
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2209-13
references.pmid: 11976090
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2009 May;117(5):675-84
references.pmid: 19479007
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 1996 Dec;33(2-3):307-13
references.pmid: 8930715
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Dec 17;5(12):e15306
references.pmid: 21179431
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9
references.pmid: 17488738
references.citation: Front Microbiol. 2012 Feb 21;3:48
references.pmid: 22363326
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jan;41(1):77-83
references.pmid: 16345703
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Nov;59(11):3941-5
references.pmid: 7506898
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19126-31
references.pmid: 19855009
references.citation: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Feb;29(2):129-35
references.pmid: 17204401
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Feb;61(2):788-92
references.pmid: 7574616
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 08;11:119
references.pmid: 20211023
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Feb 1;90(3):309-19
references.pmid: 14751686
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2010 Nov;192(21):5806-12
references.pmid: 20639323
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001 Jun;65(2):232-60 ; second page, table of contents
references.pmid: 11381101
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2007 Apr;189(8):3256-70
references.pmid: 17307855
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Jan;65(1):351-4
references.pmid: 9872808
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Nov;73(22):7128-37
references.pmid: 17890345
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
references.pmid: 2231712
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2011 Jun;193(11):2886-7
references.pmid: 21460077
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1993 Mar;3(3):266-72
references.pmid: 8485583