title: Improving methods to evaluate the impacts of plant invasions: lessons from 40 years of research.
abstract: Methods used to evaluate the ecological impacts of biological invasions vary widely from broad-scale observational studies to removal experiments in invaded communities and experimental additions in common gardens and greenhouses. Different methods provide information at diverse spatial and temporal scales with varying levels of reliability. Thus, here we provide a synthetic and critical review of the methods used to evaluate the impacts of plant invasions and provide recommendations for future research. We review the types of methods available and report patterns in methods used, including the duration and spatial scale of studies and plant functional groups examined, from 410 peer-reviewed papers published between 1971 and 2011. We found that there has been a marked increase in papers published on plant invasion impacts since 2003 and that more than half of all studies employed observational methods while <5 % included predictive modelling. Most of the studies were temporally and spatially restricted with 51 % of studies lasting <1 year and almost half of all studies conducted in plots or mesocosms <1 m(2). There was also a bias in life form studied: more than 60 % of all studies evaluated impacts of invasive forbs and graminoids while <16 % focused on invasive trees. To more effectively quantify invasion impacts, we argue that longer-term experimental research and more studies that use predictive modelling and evaluate impacts of invasions on ecosystem processes and fauna are needed. Combining broad-scale observational studies with experiments and predictive modelling may provide the most insight into invasion impacts for policy makers and land managers seeking to reduce the effects of plant invasions.
authors.affiliation: Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
authors.forename: Kerry Bohl
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Stricker
authors.affiliation: School of Agricultural, Forest, and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
authors.forename: Donald
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hagan
authors.affiliation: Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA flory@ufl.edu.
authors.forename: S Luke
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Flory
keywords: Biological invasions; experimental methods; invasive plant; non-native species; observational methods; predictive modelling
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jul;14(7):702-8
references.pmid: 21592274
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Nov 7;273(1602):2763-9
references.pmid: 17015321
references.citation: Oecologia. 2012 Oct;170(2):457-65
references.pmid: 22526935
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18145
references.pmid: 21479185
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2011 Mar;98(3):539-48
references.pmid: 21613145
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):695-703
references.pmid: 16602299
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Jan;28(1):58-66
references.pmid: 22889499
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;28(4):212-8
references.pmid: 23153723
references.citation: Science. 2009 Apr 3;324(5923):40-1
references.pmid: 19342572
references.citation: Nature. 2013 Nov 28;503(7477):517-20
references.pmid: 24256723
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Aug;25(8):479-86
references.pmid: 20605251