title: Tropical forest fragmentation affects floral visitors but not the structure of individual-based palm-pollinator networks.
abstract: Despite increasing knowledge about the effects of habitat loss on pollinators in natural landscapes, information is very limited regarding the underlying mechanisms of forest fragmentation affecting plant-pollinator interactions in such landscapes. Here, we used a network approach to describe the effects of forest fragmentation on the patterns of interactions involving the understory dominant palm Astrocaryum mexicanum (Arecaceae) and its floral visitors (including both effective and non-effective pollinators) at the individual level in a Mexican tropical rainforest landscape. Specifically, we asked: (i) Does fragment size affect the structure of individual-based plant-pollinator networks? (ii) Does the core of highly interacting visitor species change along the fragmentation size gradient? (iii) Does forest fragment size influence the abundance of effective pollinators of A. mexicanum? We found that fragment size did not affect the topological structure of the individual-based palm-pollinator network. Furthermore, while the composition of peripheral non-effective pollinators changed depending on fragment size, effective core generalist species of pollinators remained stable. We also observed that both abundance and variance of effective pollinators of male and female flowers of A. mexicanum increased with forest fragment size. These findings indicate that the presence of effective pollinators in the core of all forest fragments could keep the network structure stable along the gradient of forest fragmentation. In addition, pollination of A. mexicanum could be more effective in larger fragments, since the greater abundance of pollinators in these fragments may increase the amount of pollen and diversity of pollen donors between flowers of individual plants. Given the prevalence of fragmentation in tropical ecosystems, our results indicate that the current patterns of land use will have consequences on the underlying mechanisms of pollination in remnant forests.
authors.affiliation: Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Wesley
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Dáttilo
authors.affiliation: Red de Interacciones Multitróficas, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
authors.forename: Armando
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Aguirre
authors.affiliation: Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, campus Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico; Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.
authors.forename: Mauricio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Quesada
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
authors.forename: Rodolfo
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dirzo
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017753:Ecosystem; D035264:Flowers; D007313:Insecta / Q000502:physiology*; D054817:Pollination; D014197:Trees; D014329:Tropical Climate
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19891-6
references.pmid: 18056808
references.citation: Ecology. 2014 Feb;95(2):475-85
references.pmid: 24669740
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):895-900
references.pmid: 15729348
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99838
references.pmid: 24918750
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1981-93
references.pmid: 18705384
references.citation: Science. 2012 Mar 23;335(6075):1486-9
references.pmid: 22442482
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Jul;80(4):896-903
references.pmid: 21644976
references.citation: Science. 2014 Jul 25;345(6195):401-6
references.pmid: 25061202
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2011 Dec;108(8):1503-16
references.pmid: 21831852
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383-7
references.pmid: 12881488
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 May;15(5):475-83
references.pmid: 22414160
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Feb 22;3(1):51-4
references.pmid: 17443964
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 7;279(1734):1754-60
references.pmid: 22158957
references.citation: Ecology. 2013 Dec;94(12):2688-96
references.pmid: 24597216
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):341-6
references.pmid: 17275300
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Aug;70(2 Pt 2):025101
references.pmid: 15447530
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jan 11;445(7124):202-5
references.pmid: 17215842
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2605-11
references.pmid: 15615687
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jun;25(6):345-53
references.pmid: 20188434
references.citation: Neotrop Entomol. 2009 Mar-Apr;38(2):159-64
references.pmid: 19488503
references.citation: Am J Primatol. 2014 Jul;76(7):670-8
references.pmid: 24497349
references.citation: BMC Ecol. 2006 Aug 14;6:9
references.pmid: 16907983
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):968-80
references.pmid: 16913941
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011 Jan 25;6(1):e16143
references.pmid: 21283583
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Dec;89(12):3387-99
references.pmid: 19137945
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):306-17
references.pmid: 24107193
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1445-57
references.pmid: 19304996