title: Management of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis from the urologist's perspective.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) is a rare disease characterized by a fibrotic reaction that affects retroperitoneal organs, especially the urinary tract. In this review we analyze the current imaging techniques, morphological characteristics, clinical aspects and therapeutic aspects of idiopathic retroperitoneal disease.
  
  
  METHODS
  A PubMed search was conducted in December 2013 to find original articles, bibliographic reviews and series reports published in the past 15 years on idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis, its management and outcomes by combining terms like retroperitoneal fibrosis, periaortitis, treatment and autoimmune. A total of 89 articles were included in this review that referred strictly to IRF. We analyzed the imaging tools used for diagnostic and the decision making protocol used by physicians in the management of IRF.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A computerized tomography (CT) scan represents the most commonly used imaging technique for diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unable to differentiate more accurately between benign and malignant retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) than a CT scan. Biopsy remains the most reliable diagnostic tool for IRF. However, the histological characteristics of IRF are not yet well-deﬁned and the protocol for biopsy is not standardized in terms of template, number of biopsies and the immunohistochemical panel needed for positive diagnosis. The most common treatment reported is corticosteroid therapy alone or in combination with other immunosuppressants, whereas surgical treatment is reserved for severe cases. Indwelling ureteric stents represent the most common procedure for renal drainage, but their efficacy is questionable. Open ureterolysis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, but its purpose is only to resolve the ureteric obstruction, not to treat the retroperitoneal fibrosis. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches have been reported to be feasible, but no prospective, comparative trials have been performed due to the rarity of the disease. Surgical technique is not standardized and the outcome of the treatment only evaluates the recovery of the renal function.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The imaging procedures available today are unable to accurately differentiate between idiopathic and malignant RF. A biopsy is mandatory to confirm the diagnosis, but there is no consensus regarding the template, timing and number of biopsies needed to exclude malignancy. Open ureterolysis represents the main surgical treatment for cases with severe IRF, and laparoscopic or robotic approach may be an option in selected cases. The recovery of the renal function is a surrogate for evaluating the success of the treatment. More clinical studies are needed in order standardize the protocol for diagnostic, treatment and follow up after medical or surgical management.
authors.affiliation: Center of Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Surcel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Cristian
authors.affiliation: Center of Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Mirvald
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cristian
authors.affiliation: Center of Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Pavelescu
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cristian
authors.affiliation: Center of Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Gingu
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Constantin
authors.affiliation: Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Carmen
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Savu
authors.affiliation: Department of Anatomy, Medical School, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
authors.forename: Emre
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Huri
authors.affiliation: Center of Urological Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
authors.forename: Ioanel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Sinescu
keywords: differential diagnosis; idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis; medical treatment; retroperitoneal biopsy; surgical treatment; ureterolysis
references.citation: Clin Radiol. 1990 Aug;42(2):75-9
references.pmid: 2203584
references.citation: Radiology. 1977 Feb;122(2):339-42
references.pmid: 834873
references.citation: Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005 Jan;17 (1):34-40
references.pmid: 15604902
references.citation: J Urol. 1948 Jun;59(6):1072-9
references.pmid: 18858051
references.citation: JSLS. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):313-9
references.pmid: 20932393
references.citation: Mol Imaging Biol. 2002 Oct;4(5):363-8
references.pmid: 14537112
references.citation: Surgery. 1977 Mar;81(3):250-7
references.pmid: 841463
references.citation: BMJ. 1988 Jul 23;297(6643):240-1
references.pmid: 3046704
references.citation: Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1994 Sep;28(3):237-42
references.pmid: 7817165
references.citation: Am J Med. 2004 Feb 1;116(3):194-7
references.pmid: 14749165
references.citation: Urology. 2008 Oct;72(4):853-8
references.pmid: 18674801
references.citation: Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Apr;53(4):628-37
references.pmid: 19117656
references.citation: Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2000 Mar-Apr;55(2):69-76
references.pmid: 10959127
references.citation: Kidney Int. 2007 Sep;72 (6):742-53
references.pmid: 17622270
references.citation: Clin Nephrol. 2008 Apr;69(4):260-8
references.pmid: 18397700
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr;60(4):427-8
references.pmid: 11247880
references.citation: Am J Med. 1966 Feb;40(2):184-7
references.pmid: 5902644
references.citation: Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1017-21
references.pmid: 17572177
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1985 Apr;145(4):753-5
references.pmid: 3985741
references.citation: Am J Med. 2003 Apr 15;114(6):454-62
references.pmid: 12727578
references.citation: Can Assoc Radiol J. 2002 Jun;53(3):168-70
references.pmid: 12101539
references.citation: J Urol. 1981 Aug;126(2):255-9
references.pmid: 7265376
references.citation: Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):201-4
references.pmid: 18308083
references.citation: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Mar;24(3):856-63
references.pmid: 18952698
references.citation: Clin Nucl Med. 2002 Jun;27(6):413-5
references.pmid: 12045432
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1370-4
references.pmid: 21296397
references.citation: Cleve Clin J Med. 2002 Feb;69(2):160-6
references.pmid: 11990647
references.citation: J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):550-5
references.pmid: 12131307
references.citation: Int J Urol. 2005 Dec;12(12):1079-81
references.pmid: 16409618
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Mar;24(3):159-64
references.pmid: 24479819
references.citation: Clin Rheumatol. 2011 May;30(5):601-5
references.pmid: 20957401
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1990 Nov;63(755):842-4
references.pmid: 2252975
references.citation: Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Jun;21(3):216-21
references.pmid: 20493425
references.citation: Lancet. 2006 Jan 21;367(9506):241-51
references.pmid: 16427494
references.citation: J Urol. 1989 Mar;141(3):602-5
references.pmid: 2918601
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jan 17;144(2):101-6
references.pmid: 16418409
references.citation: Urol Int. 1998 Aug;60(4):258-61
references.pmid: 9701744
references.citation: J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):180-1
references.pmid: 11125394
references.citation: Neth J Med. 2002 Jul;60(6):231-42
references.pmid: 12365466
references.citation: Rev Urol. 2006 Fall;8(4):226-30
references.pmid: 17192802
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1996 Dec;66(6):920-4
references.pmid: 8941055
references.citation: J Endourol. 2002 Oct;16(8):571-4
references.pmid: 12470464
references.citation: Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Mar-Apr;23(2):231-4
references.pmid: 15895895
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Feb;164(2):515-6
references.pmid: 7840016
references.citation: Histopathology. 1984 Jul;8(4):589-600
references.pmid: 6479901
references.citation: Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Jul;24(5):444-50
references.pmid: 23246124
references.citation: Clin Imaging. 2012 May-Jun;36(3):167-75
references.pmid: 22542374
references.citation: Eur Urol. 1994;26(4):286-90
references.pmid: 7713126
references.citation: Urol Int. 1996;56(2):133-6
references.pmid: 8659011
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Aug;157(2):321-9
references.pmid: 1853816
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jun;64(6):828-33
references.pmid: 15897305
references.citation: Radiographics. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):1053-80
references.pmid: 23842972
references.citation: Radiol Clin North Am. 1996 Nov;34(6):1259-75
references.pmid: 8898793
references.citation: Urol Int. 2014;93(3):320-5
references.pmid: 25073896
references.citation: Drug Saf. 1998 Jul;19(1):45-55
references.pmid: 9673857
references.citation: Urologe A. 2000 Mar;39(2):141-8
references.pmid: 10768224
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981 Sep;137(3):535-8
references.pmid: 6974466
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Oct;47(10 ):1535-8
references.pmid: 18687710
references.citation: Medicine (Baltimore). 2012 Sep;91(5):242-50
references.pmid: 22932788
references.citation: BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(5):703-7
references.pmid: 20128779
references.citation: J Urol. 1996 Oct;156(4):1403-10
references.pmid: 8808882
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):140-7
references.pmid: 7799014
references.citation: Nuklearmedizin. 1996 Feb;35(1):25-30
references.pmid: 8746169
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):118-26
references.pmid: 22733902
references.citation: Acta Cytol. 1997 Mar-Apr;41(2):461-6
references.pmid: 9100781
references.citation: Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):46-9
references.pmid: 16806417
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 2000 Feb;73(866):214-22
references.pmid: 10884739
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):423-31
references.pmid: 18647912
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1875-8
references.pmid: 18353394
references.citation: J Endourol. 2008 Aug;22(8):1669-75
references.pmid: 18681806
references.citation: Lancet. 2011 Jul 23;378(9788):338-46
references.pmid: 21733570
references.citation: Acta Urol Belg. 1996 Dec;64(4):15-8
references.pmid: 9008972
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):307-12
references.pmid: 16059677
references.citation: J Clin Pathol. 1970 Nov;23(8):681-9
references.pmid: 5488039
references.citation: Blood. 1986 Oct;68(4):837-45
references.pmid: 3530348
references.citation: Dig Dis. 1990;8(4):206-22
references.pmid: 2197042
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Nov;147(5):1067-74
references.pmid: 3532732
references.citation: Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 May;17(5):482-90
references.pmid: 8470762
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):502-6
references.pmid: 18647923
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1958 Jul;46(195):58-62
references.pmid: 13572818
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Feb;77(2):339-43
references.pmid: 20510441
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989 Mar-Apr;13(2):277-81
references.pmid: 2925914
references.citation: Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Apr;86(4):297-303
references.pmid: 21454732
references.citation: Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;108(3):c213-20
references.pmid: 18332635
references.citation: Eur Urol. 1994;25(1):82-4
references.pmid: 8307083
references.citation: J Intern Med. 2007 Aug;262(2):224-34
references.pmid: 17645590
references.citation: Diagn Cytopathol. 1999 Jul;21(1):22-6
references.pmid: 10405803
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Feb;147(2):426-9
references.pmid: 1531078
references.citation: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Sep;21(9):2485-90
references.pmid: 16702201
references.citation: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Sep;19(9):2397-9
references.pmid: 15299101
references.citation: Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):139-43
references.pmid: 2740497