title: A patient-centric distribution architecture for medical image sharing.
abstract: Over the past decade, rapid development of imaging technologies has resulted in the introduction of improved imaging devices, such as multi-modality scanners that produce combined positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) images. The adoption of picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in hospitals have dramatically improved the ability to digitally share medical image studies via portable storage, mobile devices and the Internet. This has in turn led to increased productivity, greater flexibility, and improved communication between hospital staff, referring physicians, and outpatients. However, many of these sharing and viewing capabilities are limited to proprietary vendor-specific applications. Furthermore, there are still interoperability and deployment issues which reduce the rate of adoption of such technologies, thus leaving many stakeholders, particularly outpatients and referring physicians, with access to only traditional still images with no ability to view or interpret the data in full. In this paper, we present a distribution architecture for medical image display across numerous devices and media, which uses a preprocessor and an in-built networking framework to improve compatibility and promote greater accessibility of medical data. Our INVOLVE2 system consists of three main software modules: 1) a preprocessor, which collates and converts imaging studies into a compressed and distributable format; 2) a PACS-compatible workflow for self-managing distribution of medical data, e.g. via CD USB, network etc; 3) support for potential mobile and web-based data access. The focus of this study was on cultivating patient-centric care, by allowing outpatient users to comfortably access and interpret their own data. As such, the image viewing software included on our cross-platform CDs was designed with a simple and intuitive user-interface (UI) for use by outpatients and referring physicians. Furthermore, digital image access via mobile devices or web-based access enables users to engage with their data in a convenient and user-friendly way. We evaluated the INVOLVE2 system using a pilot deployment in a hospital environment.
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Liviu
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Constantinescu
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Jinman
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Ashnil
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kumar
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Daiki
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Haraguchi
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia ; Department of PET and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Lingfeng
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wen
authors.affiliation: School of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Building J12, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Dagan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Feng
keywords: Clinical workflow support system; Medical image viewer; Positron emission tomography - computed tomography; Telemedicine; patient-centric healthcare
references.citation: Int J Med Inform. 2003 Sep;71(2-3):157-63
references.pmid: 14519408
references.citation: Mol Imaging. 2003 Jul;2(3):131-7
references.pmid: 14649056
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2004 Jan;45 Suppl 1:46S-55S
references.pmid: 14736835
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):205-16
references.pmid: 15534753
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2004 Sep;17(3):217-25
references.pmid: 15534754
references.citation: Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):405-22
references.pmid: 16436809
references.citation: Cleve Clin J Med. 2006 Dec;73(12):1075-87
references.pmid: 17190311
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):360-85
references.pmid: 17255408
references.citation: J Am Coll Radiol. 2005 Nov;2(11):927-31
references.pmid: 17411967
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1627-30
references.pmid: 19020229
references.citation: J Med Internet Res. 2009 Apr 29;11(2):e14
references.pmid: 19403467
references.citation: Telemed J E Health. 2009 Sep;15(7):634-41
references.pmid: 19747071
references.citation: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2010 Jul;5(4):411-9
references.pmid: 20390372
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2011 Apr;24(2):184-9
references.pmid: 20567992
references.citation: Int J Med Inform. 2011 Feb;80(2):e26-31
references.pmid: 21041113
references.citation: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:1053-6
references.pmid: 21097211
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Mar;196(3):605-10
references.pmid: 21343503
references.citation: Biomed Eng Online. 2011 Apr 05;10:24
references.pmid: 21466669
references.citation: IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012 Jan;16(1):40-52
references.pmid: 22049371
references.citation: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:5279-82
references.pmid: 22255529
references.citation: Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2010 Apr 10;2010:2123-2132
references.pmid: 27990502