title: The role of soft-tissue traction forces in bone segment transport for callus distraction : A force measurement cadaver study on eight human femora using a novel intramedullary callus distraction system.
abstract: Callus distraction using bone segment transport systems is an applied process in the treatment of bone defects. However, complications such as muscle contractures, axial deviation and pin track infections occur in the treatment process using the currently available devices. Since successful treatment is influenced by the applied distraction force, knowledge of the biomechanical properties of the involved soft tissues is essential to improve clinical outcome and treatment strategies. To date, little data on distraction forces and the role of soft-tissue traction forces are available. The aim of this study was to assess traction forces generated by soft tissues during bone segment transport using a novel intramedullary callus distraction system on eight human femora. For traction force measurements, bone segment transport over 60-mm femoral defects was conducted under constant load measurement using 40- and 60-mm bone segments. The required traction forces for 60-mm bone segments were higher than forces for 40-mm bone segments. This study demonstrates that soft tissues are of relevance biomechanically in bone segment transport. The size of the bone segment and the selection of the region for osteotomy are of utmost importance in defining the treatment procedure.
authors.affiliation: Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Gate 3 Hospital Road, Concord, 2139, Australia, konstantin.horas@sydney.edu.au.
authors.forename: Konstantin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Horas
authors.forename: Reinhard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schnettler
authors.forename: Gerrit
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Maier
authors.forename: Gaby
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Schneider
authors.forename: Uwe
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Horas
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):639-43
references.pmid: 21511930
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan;(250):58-60
references.pmid: 2293945
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):147-55
references.pmid: 8156665
references.citation: Med Eng Phys. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(9):708-15
references.pmid: 10098617
references.citation: Chirurg. 1990 Aug;61(8):605-9
references.pmid: 2226033
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):838-48
references.pmid: 12728034
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jun;(327):291-304
references.pmid: 8641077
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Mar-Apr;(139):102-9
references.pmid: 455825
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):73-9
references.pmid: 8156700
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jun;93(6):782-7
references.pmid: 21586777
references.citation: Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 Sep;49(9):248-56
references.pmid: 15493133
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):55-63
references.pmid: 8156697
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jun;93(6):788-92
references.pmid: 21586778
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Jan;12(1):17-21
references.pmid: 11415667
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Nov;78(6):979-83
references.pmid: 8951019
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jan;(238):249-81
references.pmid: 2910611
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Aug;(293):8-17
references.pmid: 8339513
references.citation: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Mar;124(2):129-33
references.pmid: 14745566