title: Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley.
abstract: Stimuli that resemble humans, but are not perfectly human-like, are disliked compared to distinctly human and non-human stimuli. Accounts of this "Uncanny Valley" effect often focus on how changes in human resemblance can evoke different emotional responses. We present an alternate account based on the novel hypothesis that the Uncanny Valley is not directly related to 'human-likeness' per se, but instead reflects a more general form of stimulus devaluation that occurs when inhibition is triggered to resolve conflict between competing stimulus-related representations. We consider existing support for this inhibitory-devaluation hypothesis and further assess its feasibility through tests of two corresponding predictions that arise from the link between conflict-resolving inhibition and aversive response: (1) that the pronounced disliking of Uncanny-type stimuli will occur for any image that strongly activates multiple competing stimulus representations, even in the absence of any human-likeness, and (2) that the negative peak of an 'Uncanny Valley' should occur at the point of greatest stimulus-related conflict and not (in the presence of human-likeness) always closer to the 'human' end of a perceptual continuum. We measured affective responses to a set of line drawings representing non-human animal-animal morphs, in which each continuum midpoint was a bistable image (Experiment 1), as well as to sets of human-robot and human-animal computer-generated morphs (Experiment 2). Affective trends depicting classic Uncanny Valley functions occurred for all continua, including the non-human stimuli. Images at continua midpoints elicited significantly more negative affect than images at endpoints, even when the continua included a human endpoint. This illustrates the feasibility of the inhibitory-devaluation hypothesis and the need for further research into the possibility that the strong dislike of Uncanny-type stimuli reflects the negative affective consequences of cognitive inhibition.
authors.affiliation: Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA.
authors.forename: Anne E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Ferrey
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Tyler J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Burleigh
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Mark J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Fenske
keywords: affect; cognitive conflict; cognitive dissonance; emotion; inhibition; inhibitory devaluation; uncanny valley; visual perception
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 19;5:1219
references.pmid: 25477829
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):453-9
references.pmid: 21889391
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2008 Oct 03;2:13
references.pmid: 18958213
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):753-8
references.pmid: 16181435
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;108:44-79
references.pmid: 23856628
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 26;3:575
references.pmid: 23272002
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1055-61
references.pmid: 15875975
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):168-79
references.pmid: 20731524
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6
references.pmid: 15117008
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2015 May;25(5):1219-27
references.pmid: 24275827
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
references.pmid: 11488380
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 21;5:1488
references.pmid: 25653623
references.citation: Am J Psychol. 1967 Dec;80(4):541-57
references.pmid: 4866288
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):169-79
references.pmid: 22022896
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):613-25
references.pmid: 24016067
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):649-59
references.pmid: 21642353
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):364-82
references.pmid: 15582859
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1316-22
references.pmid: 17651005
references.citation: Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(3):248-54
references.pmid: 22956990
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Comput Human Behav. 2009 May 1;25(3):695-710
references.pmid: 25506126
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Nov 24;5:126
references.pmid: 22131970
references.citation: Iperception. 2011;2(1):10-2
references.pmid: 23145223
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
references.pmid: 17254636
references.citation: Perception. 2004;33(5):531-46
references.pmid: 15250659
references.citation: Biol Psychol. 2004 Oct;67(1-2):51-76
references.pmid: 15130525
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):310-8
references.pmid: 19540794
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1956 May;52(3):384-9
references.pmid: 13318848
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2009 Nov;12(11):1469-74
references.pmid: 19759538
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Oct;45(4):782-91
references.pmid: 6631664
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):537-42
references.pmid: 14629683
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):169-91
references.pmid: 19625997
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1404-15
references.pmid: 16366798
references.citation: Perception. 2013;42(9):998-1000
references.pmid: 24386720
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;81(6):989-1000
references.pmid: 11761320
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1987 Jan;94(1):23-41
references.pmid: 3823304
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Dec;7(4):367-79
references.pmid: 18189010
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2012;2:864
references.pmid: 23162690
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
references.pmid: 14963333
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Jul 01;4(7):539-51
references.pmid: 15330700
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Mar 07;4:108
references.pmid: 23471214
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:293-308
references.pmid: 19733764
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Mar;12(3):154-67
references.pmid: 21331082
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Apr;7(4):413-22
references.pmid: 21515639