title: Anisotropy in solar wind plasma turbulence.
abstract: A review of spectral anisotropy and variance anisotropy for solar wind fluctuations is given, with the discussion covering inertial range and dissipation range scales. For the inertial range, theory, simulations and observations are more or less in accord, in that fluctuation energy is found to be primarily in modes with quasi-perpendicular wavevectors (relative to a suitably defined mean magnetic field), and also that most of the fluctuation energy is in the vector components transverse to the mean field. Energy transfer in the parallel direction and the energy levels in the parallel components are both relatively weak. In the dissipation range, observations indicate that variance anisotropy tends to decrease towards isotropic levels as the electron gyroradius is approached; spectral anisotropy results are mixed. Evidence for and against wave interpretations and turbulence interpretations of these features will be discussed. We also present new simulation results concerning evolution of variance anisotropy for different classes of initial conditions, each with typical background solar wind parameters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand seano@waikato.ac.nz.
authors.forename: S
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2814-7288
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Oughton
authors.affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, DE 19716, USA.
authors.forename: W H
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Matthaeus
authors.affiliation: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, DE 19716, USA.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wan
authors.affiliation: Centre for Fusion, Space and Astrophysics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
authors.forename: K T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Osman
keywords: anisotropy; turbulence; waves
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 May 13;373(2041):
references.pmid: 25848081
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2011 Aug 26;107(9):095002
references.pmid: 21929247
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Sep 24;105(13):131101
references.pmid: 21230758
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Mar 11;116(10):105002
references.pmid: 27015486
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Oct 24;101(17):175005
references.pmid: 18999759
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Dec 2;95(23):231101
references.pmid: 16384291
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 May 13;373(2041):
references.pmid: 25848085
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Apr 30;104(17):171101
references.pmid: 20482101
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2010 Jun 25;104(25):255002
references.pmid: 20867388
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Feb 24;108(8):085001
references.pmid: 22463536
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2013 May 31;110(22):225002
references.pmid: 23767731
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Nov 27;85(22):4656-9
references.pmid: 11082620
references.citation: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Dec;78(6 Pt 2):066301
references.pmid: 19256939
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 May 13;373(2041):
references.pmid: 25848084
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 May 13;373(2041):
references.pmid: 25848079
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2015 May 13;373(2041):
references.pmid: 25848075
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Mar 24;96(11):115002
references.pmid: 16605832