title: Preventing ophthalmia neonatorum.
abstract: The use of silver nitrate as prophylaxis for neonatal ophthalmia was instituted in the late 1800s to prevent the devastating effects of neonatal ocular infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. At that time - during the preantibiotic era - many countries made such prophylaxis mandatory by law. Today, neonatal gonococcal ophthalmia is rare in Canada, but ocular prophylaxis for this condition remains mandatory in some provinces/ territories. Silver nitrate drops are no longer available and erythromycin, the only ophthalmic antibiotic eye ointment currently available for use in newborns, is of questionable efficacy. Ocular prophylaxis is not effective in preventing chlamydial conjunctivitis. Applying medication to the eyes of newborns may result in mild eye irritation and has been perceived by some parents as interfering with mother-infant bonding. Physicians caring for newborns should advocate for rescinding mandatory ocular prophylaxis laws. More effective means of preventing ophthalmia neonatorum include screening all pregnant women for gonorrhea and chlamydia infection, and treatment and follow-up of those found to be infected. Mothers who were not screened should be tested at delivery. Infants of mothers with untreated gonococcal infection at delivery should receive ceftriaxone. Infants exposed to chlamydia at delivery should be followed closely for signs of infection.
authors.forename: Dorothy L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Noni E
authors.initials: NE
authors.lastname: MacDonald
keywords: Chlamydia; Gonococcus; Neonatal ophthalmia; Prophylaxis; STIs; Screening in pregnancy
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 23;320(12):769-72
references.pmid: 2922026
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):562-6
references.pmid: 7838190
references.citation: J Trop Pediatr. 2007 Dec;53(6):388-92
references.pmid: 18055489
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1981 May;67(5):737-8
references.pmid: 7255007
references.citation: Sex Transm Dis. 1987 Oct-Dec;14(4):195-200
references.pmid: 3438783
references.citation: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jun;157(6):565-71
references.pmid: 12796237
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Nov 15;2(8516):1145-9
references.pmid: 2877285
references.citation: J Pediatr. 2010 Feb;156(2):320-1
references.pmid: 20105641
references.citation: Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Sep;7(7):480-8
references.pmid: 20046325
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1989;67(5):471-7
references.pmid: 2611972
references.citation: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 Jul-Aug;55(4):319-27
references.pmid: 20630358
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 17;318(11):653-7
references.pmid: 3278234
references.citation: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989 Aug;8(8):491-5
references.pmid: 2771529
references.citation: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Dec;11(12):1026-30
references.pmid: 1461692
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62(1):95-8
references.pmid: 6609023
references.citation: Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;91(11):1430-4
references.pmid: 17947266
references.citation: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Feb;30(2):175-6
references.pmid: 20885334
references.citation: J Fam Pract. 1981 Oct;13(5):739, 743-4
references.pmid: 7276881
references.citation: Ophthalmology. 2011 Jul;118(7):1454-8
references.pmid: 21439642
references.citation: Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Dec;53 Suppl 3:S99-102
references.pmid: 22080275
references.citation: JAMA. 1981 Nov 20;246(20):2321-2
references.pmid: 7299949
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1975 Sep;56(3):368-73
references.pmid: 808790
references.citation: J Am Med Assoc. 1951 Apr 7;145(14):1052-5
references.pmid: 14803306
references.citation: Am J Dis Child. 1971 Jan;121(1):1-3
references.pmid: 5543849