title: Spino-pelvic alignment influences disc hydration properties after AIS surgery: a prospective MRI-based study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To analyze the disc hydration and volumetric changes of the intervertebral disc after scoliosis surgery depending on the sagittal spino-pelvic organization.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a prospective MRI study in 45 patients with surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Fusion ended at L1 (n = 13), L2 (n = 14), L3 (n = 11) or L4 (n = 7). Total disc (Vd) and nucleus volumes (Vn) were extrapolated from 3D reconstruction using a custom-made image processing software (Biomechlab, Toulouse, France). Nucleus and external disc contours were semi-automatically detected on turbo spin echo T2-weighted sequence joined 3-mm sagittal cuts. Disc hydration was extrapolated from the nucleus-disc volume ratio (Vn/Vd). Radiographic sagittal parameters were measured pre- and post-operatively on full spine standing views (pelvic incidence, sacral slope, L1S1 lumbar lordosis). Lumbo-pelvic congruity was calculated by the ratio LL/SS according to Stagnara.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean PI of the cohort was 55° (34°-85°). After surgical correction, lumbar lordosis was slightly increased by 3° (p = 0.02) decreasing lumbo-pelvic congruity from 1.37 to 1.27 (p < 0.01). When pelvic incidence was less than 55° (mean PI 46°), nucleus volumes have increased on average by 30 % compared to the preoperative status in the unfused lumbar discs, while the total disc volumes has remained stable. Five-year follow-up (n = 13) confirmed the constant improvement of the disc hydration ratio. When PI was high (mean PI 64°), volumetric changes were very mild and significant changes in nucleus volumes and disc hydration ratio concerned only the intermediate lumbar levels (L2L3, L3L4 and L4L5).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This prospective MRI study showed a significant and sustainable improvement in T2 hypersignal of the disc, indirectly indicating improvement of disc hydration content after AIS surgery. Analysis of disc volumetric changes according to the pelvic incidence suggests that these changes are under the influence of the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment. PI seems to play a key role in the homeostasis of the discs under fusion and should be taken into account for preoperative planning. The restoration of the lumbo-pelvic congruence may help to limit early degenerative changes in the free-motion segment discs after AIS surgery. Hydration content was less sensitive to surgery when PI was high, suggesting higher shear stress in the lower discs. Longer follow-up is required to confirm this hypothesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Spine Surgery, CMCR des Massues, Croix Rouge Française, 92 rue Edmond Locard, 69322, Lyon Cedex 05, France, k.abelin-genevois@cmcr-massues.com.
authors.forename: Kariman
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Abelin-Genevois
authors.forename: Erik
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Estivalezes
authors.forename: Jerome
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Briot
authors.forename: Annick
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sévely
authors.forename: Jerome
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sales de Gauzy
authors.forename: Pascal
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Swider
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001834:Body Water / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D008141:Lordosis / Q000473:pathology; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012600:Scoliosis / Q000601:surgery*
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Oct;94(10):1298-304
references.pmid: 23015552
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22 Suppl 2:S203-15
references.pmid: 23188161
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952 Aug;34-B(3):421-7
references.pmid: 12999923
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jul-Aug;7(4):335-42
references.pmid: 7135066
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Oct 1;31(21):2484-90
references.pmid: 17023859
references.citation: Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Feb;41(2):163-7
references.pmid: 21424906
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23 ):1948-54
references.pmid: 21289549
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2654-67
references.pmid: 15564914
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 May;26(4):337-42
references.pmid: 21146266
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2001 Mar;42(2):187-97
references.pmid: 11259948
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1930-43
references.pmid: 20838264
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Apr;28(4):370-7
references.pmid: 23489477
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6 Suppl):S4-11
references.pmid: 15767885
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 1;28(13):1404-9
references.pmid: 12838098
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Feb;87(2):260-7
references.pmid: 15687145
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103
references.pmid: 9629932
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2710-23
references.pmid: 15564920
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:641-6
references.pmid: 21809015
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jul 1;32(15):E405-12
references.pmid: 17621196