title: Neurofunctional correlates of ethical, food-related decision-making.
abstract: For consumers today, the perceived ethicality of a food's production method can be as important a purchasing consideration as its price. Still, few studies have examined how, neurofunctionally, consumers are making ethical, food-related decisions. We examined how consumers' ethical concern about a food's production method may relate to how, neurofunctionally, they make decisions whether to purchase that food. Forty-six participants completed a measure of the extent to which they took ethical concern into consideration when making food-related decisions. They then underwent a series of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans while performing a food-related decision-making (FRDM) task. During this task, they made 56 decisions whether to purchase a food based on either its price (i.e., high or low, the "price condition") or production method (i.e., with or without the use of cages, the "production method condition"), but not both. For 23 randomly selected participants, we performed an exploratory, whole-brain correlation between ethical concern and differential neurofunctional activity in the price and production method conditions. Ethical concern correlated negatively and significantly with differential neurofunctional activity in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). For the remaining 23 participants, we performed a confirmatory, region-of-interest (ROI) correlation between the same variables, using an 8-mm3 volume situated in the left dlPFC. Again, the variables correlated negatively and significantly. This suggests, when making ethical, food-related decisions, the more consumers take ethical concern into consideration, the less they may rely on neurofunctional activity in the left dlPFC, possibly because making these decisions is more routine for them, and therefore a more perfunctory process requiring fewer cognitive resources.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
authors.forename: J Bradley C
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Cherry
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
authors.forename: Jared M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Bruce
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America.
authors.forename: Jayson L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Lusk
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America.
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Crespi
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, the University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.
authors.forename: Seung-Lark
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Lim
authors.affiliation: Joint Department of Pediatrics, the University of Kansas Medical Center and Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
authors.forename: Amanda S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Bruce
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000191:economics*; D003657:Decision Making; D004531:Eggs / Q000191:economics; D004989:Ethics; D005260:Female; D005502:Food / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Pediatr. 2013 Apr;162(4):759-764.e2
references.pmid: 23211928
references.citation: Prev Vet Med. 2012 Jan 1;103(1):31-7
references.pmid: 21996451
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Dec 1;6(12):517-523
references.pmid: 12475712
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2010 Oct 15;53(1):215-20
references.pmid: 20570738
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Jan;6(1):48-57
references.pmid: 20194515
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Sep 12;7:65
references.pmid: 24062650
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400
references.pmid: 15473975
references.citation: Integr Zool. 2006 Mar;1(1):53-8
references.pmid: 21395992
references.citation: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010 Dec;5(4):404-13
references.pmid: 20150342
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 27;31(30):11077-87
references.pmid: 21795556
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2008 May;116(5):578-82
references.pmid: 18470284
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):118-25
references.pmid: 17276130
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Apr;114(4):591-6
references.pmid: 16581551
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Feb;115(2):296-7
references.pmid: 17384781
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 May;4(3):274-90
references.pmid: 26158964
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1995 Mar;2(1):45-53
references.pmid: 9343589
references.citation: Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):365-78
references.pmid: 15473973
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2003 Jul 1;14(9):1215-9
references.pmid: 12824762
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;6:86
references.pmid: 23087623
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 Jan;13(1):91-100
references.pmid: 11133312
references.citation: Fam Community Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):11-20
references.pmid: 20010001
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Mar;6(3):316-22
references.pmid: 12592404
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;69(7):741-9
references.pmid: 22752238
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(12):1668-82
references.pmid: 12887991
references.citation: J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3907S-3910S
references.pmid: 14672289
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):799-809
references.pmid: 16276356
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2006 Apr;60(3):220-32
references.pmid: 16427175
references.citation: Public Health Nutr. 2005 Jun;8(4):348-56
references.pmid: 15975179
references.citation: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Jan;3(1):9-15
references.pmid: 16482973
references.citation: J Environ Health. 2012 Mar;74(7):22-8
references.pmid: 22428319
references.citation: Appetite. 2000 Feb;34(1):55-9
references.pmid: 10744892
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):671-7
references.pmid: 12167873
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Feb;115(2):308-12
references.pmid: 17384784
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):646-8
references.pmid: 19407204
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Feb;115(2):298-302
references.pmid: 17384782
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):319-21
references.pmid: 17602852
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):668-70
references.pmid: 12167872
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 15;33(3):969-79
references.pmid: 17010646
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):141-8
references.pmid: 12015229
references.citation: Appetite. 1995 Dec;25(3):267-84
references.pmid: 8746966
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2011 May 15;56(2):709-15
references.pmid: 20510371
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13543-54
references.pmid: 23015444
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):182-6
references.pmid: 12744971
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 11;30(32):10799-808
references.pmid: 20702709
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Apr 19;446(7138):908-11
references.pmid: 17377536
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar;10(3):108-16
references.pmid: 16469524
references.citation: J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Spring;37(1):13-21
references.pmid: 20378872
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
references.pmid: 15036882
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Apr;35(7):1065-74
references.pmid: 22487036
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:535-74
references.pmid: 17600525