title: Using quantitative risk information in decisions about statins: a qualitative study in a community setting.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A large literature informs guidance for GPs about communicating quantitative risk information so as to facilitate shared decision making. However, relatively little has been written about how patients utilise such information in practice.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To understand the role of quantitative risk information in patients' accounts of decisions about taking statins.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a qualitative study, with participants recruited and interviewed in community settings.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 participants aged >50 years, all of whom had been offered statins. Data were analysed thematically, using elements of the constant comparative method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Interviewees drew frequently on numerical test results to explain their decisions about preventive medication. In contrast, they seldom mentioned quantitative risk information, and never offered it as a rationale for action. Test results were spoken of as objects of concern despite an often-explicit absence of understanding, so lack of understanding seems unlikely to explain the non-use of risk estimates. Preventive medication was seen as 'necessary' either to treat test results, or because of personalised, unequivocal advice from a doctor.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study's findings call into question the assumption that people will heed and use numerical risk information once they understand it; these data highlight the need to consider the ways in which different kinds of knowledge are used in practice in everyday contexts. There was little evidence from this study that understanding probabilistic risk information was a necessary or valued condition for making decisions about statin use.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, and North Hill Medical Group, Colchester.
authors.forename: Louisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Polak
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Green
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003657:Decision Making; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D058006:General Practice / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology; D036301:Qualitative Research; D040242:Risk Reduction Behavior
chemical_list: D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
keywords: decision making, shared; general practice; prevention; risk; statins, HMG-CoA
references.citation: BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):873
references.pmid: 12386041
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):892-9
references.pmid: 11141876
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Oct 11;327(7419):841
references.pmid: 14551099
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Nov;53(496):851-7
references.pmid: 14702904
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61
references.pmid: 10452420
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Jan;55(510):6-13
references.pmid: 15667759
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(1):133-55
references.pmid: 15847968
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;12(1):13-23
references.pmid: 16422776
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2007 Sep;65(5):1059-70
references.pmid: 17540488
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(2):362-75
references.pmid: 17950508
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Apr;30(3):429-44
references.pmid: 18194358
references.citation: Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):196-7
references.pmid: 18474880
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Jul;31(5):762-78
references.pmid: 19659735
references.citation: Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):45-54
references.pmid: 19811545
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):594-609
references.pmid: 20008151
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:59
references.pmid: 21703010
references.citation: J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):957-63
references.pmid: 21851511
references.citation: Prev Med. 2013 Aug;57(2):129-34
references.pmid: 23701848
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD001431
references.pmid: 24470076
references.citation: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S7
references.pmid: 24625237
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Apr;64(621):166-7
references.pmid: 24686863
references.citation: BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:106
references.pmid: 24885409
references.citation: Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):242-54
references.pmid: 12940797
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 2000 Jul-Sep;20(3):290-7
references.pmid: 10929851