title: Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage.
abstract: Many invasive species are considered competitively superior to native species, with the strongest competition expected in species with similar niches and/or in closely related species. However, competition outcome is strongly context-dependent as competitive strength varies along environmental gradients, and life stages, and also depends on abundances. To explore the importance of these factors, we examined competition effects in an experiment with three Impatiens species (Balsaminaceae) widespread in central Europe and sharing similar life-history characteristics and habitats: the native I. noli-tangere, and two invasive species, I. parviflora and I. glandulifera. We compared their competitive strength and reciprocal impacts under two levels of water and light availability, two overall planting densities and three competitor densities. We assessed species performance (ability to complete the life-cycle, biomass and fecundity) and temporal competition dynamics in a garden pot experiment. Environmental variables had lower explanatory power than overall planting and competitor density, which indicates the importance of competitive interactions when evaluating plant performance and potential invasion success. Despite poor and delayed germination, the invasive I. glandulifera attained dominance even at a high competitor density and was competitively superior across all treatments, exceeding the height of both congeners. Impatiens parviflora was competitively weakest, having a negligible impact on both native I. noli-tangere and invasive I. glandulifera. The intermediate competitive strength of the native I. noli-tangere probably results from its intermediate height, and good germination rate and timing. The difference in height among species increased during the experiment when I. glandulifera was involved; this species continues growing until autumn, enhancing its competitive superiority. The results provide a mechanistic understanding for the competitive exclusion of native I. noli-tangere that occurs in stands with I. glandulifera, but the limited impact of I. parviflora on I. noli-tangere in their mixed stands.
authors.affiliation: Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice CZ-252 43, Czech Republic Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, Prague CZ-128 44, Czech Republic jan.cuda@ibot.cas.cz.
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Čuda
authors.affiliation: Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice CZ-252 43, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Hana
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Skálová
authors.affiliation: Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice CZ-252 43, Czech Republic Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, Prague CZ-128 01, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Zdeněk
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Janovský
authors.affiliation: Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice CZ-252 43, Czech Republic Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, Prague CZ-128 44, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Petr
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pyšek
keywords: Alien species; balsam; competition; congeners; plant density; shading levels; water availability
references.citation: Science. 1960 Apr 29;131(3409):1292-7
references.pmid: 14399717
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Aug;9(8):981-93
references.pmid: 16913942
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1746-8
references.pmid: 17588930
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):674-81
references.pmid: 18400019
references.citation: Am Nat. 2001 Sep;158(3):324-30
references.pmid: 18707328
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2009 Feb;23(1):164-73
references.pmid: 18950474
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Feb;13(2):235-45
references.pmid: 20002494
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2010 Sep;13(9):1085-93
references.pmid: 20576030
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):656-61
references.pmid: 21187380
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):439-40
references.pmid: 21189300
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Jul;26(7):333-9
references.pmid: 21601306
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2007 Apr;94(4):526-32
references.pmid: 21636422
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Aug;14(8):782-7
references.pmid: 21672121
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(7):1429-38
references.pmid: 22247125
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 May 10;8(5):e62842
references.pmid: 23675432
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2013 Dec;112(9):1921-30
references.pmid: 24214934
references.citation: Evol Appl. 2010 Mar;3(2):169-78
references.pmid: 25567917
references.citation: Oecologia. 1990 Apr;82(4):513-526
references.pmid: 28311477