title: Erasing traumatic memories: when context and social interests can outweigh personal autonomy.
abstract: Neuroscientific research on the removal of unpleasant and traumatic memories is still at a very early stage, but is making rapid progress and has stirred a significant philosophical and neuroethical debate. Even if memory is considered to be a fundamental element of personal identity, in the context of memory-erasing the autonomy of decision-making seems prevailing. However, there seem to be situations where the overall context in which people might choose to intervene on their memories would lead to view those actions as counterproductive. In this article, I outline situations where the so-called composition effects can produce negative results for everyone involved, even if the individual decisions are not as such negative. In such situations medical treatments that usually everyone should be free to take, following the principle of autonomy, can make it so that the personal autonomy of the individuals in the group considered is damaged or even destroyed. In these specific cases, in which what is called the "conformity to context" prevails, the moral admissibility of procedures of memory-erasing is called into question and the principle of personal autonomy turns out to be subordinate to social interests benefitting every member of the group.
authors: Centro universitario Internazionale, Via Garbasso 42, Arezzo, 52100, Italy. lavazza67@gmail.com.
authors: Andrea
authors: A
authors: Lavazza
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000941:ethics*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000523:psychology*