title: Rural definition of health: a systematic literature review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The advent of patient-centered care challenges policy makers, health care administrators, clinicians, and patient advocates to understand the factors that contribute to effective patient activation. Improved understanding of how patients think about and define their health is needed to more effectively "activate" patients, and to nurture and support patients' efforts to improve their health. Researchers have intimated for over 25 years that rural populations approach health in a distinct fashion that may differ from their non-rural counterparts.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess the extent and strength of evidence for rural definition of health. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in English, reported on original research and presented findings or commentary relevant to rural definition of health, were published over the last 40 years, and were based on observations of rural U.S., Canadian, or Australian populations. Two reviewers were assigned to each selected article and blinded to the other reviewer's comments. For discordant reviews, a third blinded review was performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 125 published articles identified from the literature, 34 included commentary or findings relevant to a rural definition of health. Of these studies, 6 included an urban comparison group. Few studies compared rural and urban definitions of health directly. Findings relevant to rural definition of health covered a broad range; however, good health was commonly characterized as being able to work, reciprocate in social relationships, and maintain independence. This review largely confirmed many general characteristics on rural views of health, but also documented the extensive methodological limitations, both in terms of quantity and quality, of studies that empirically compare rural vs. urban samples. Most notably, the evidence base in this area is weakened by the frequent absence of parallel comparison groups and standardized assessment tools.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  To engage and activate rural patients in their own healthcare, a better understanding of the health beliefs in rural populations is needed. This review suggests that rural residents may indeed hold distinct views on how to define health, but more rigorous studies are needed to confirm these findings.
authors: Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN, 55805, USA. cgessert@yahoo.com.
authors: Charles
authors: C
authors: Gessert
authors: Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN, 55805, USA. stephen.waring@eirh.org.
authors: Stephen
authors: S
authors: Waring
authors: Geisinger Center for Health Research, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. ldbaileydavis@geisinger.edu.
authors: Lisa
authors: L
authors: Bailey-Davis
authors: Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, MN, 55805, USA. pat.conway@eirh.org.
authors: Pat
authors: P
authors: Conway
authors: LCF Research, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA. mroberts@lcfresearch.org.
authors: Melissa
authors: M
authors: Roberts
authors: Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA. vanwormer.jeffrey@mcrf.mfldclin.edu.
authors: Jeffrey
authors: J
authors: VanWormer
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D012423:Rural Health; D012424:Rural Population; D014937:Work