title: MSer - A new, neutral descriptor for someone with multiple sclerosis.
abstract: Lay-members of the public are often involved in grant and ethics review panels. Furthermore grant applications/reports all require some form of lay summary. In response to critical remarks from people with multiple sclerosis (MS) about using the term 'sufferer' as a descriptor, a series of surveys using the internet/social media were undertaken. People who had MS did not like being called the politically-correct 'client' (1%) but also preferred not to be called a 'patient' (5%) or a 'sufferer' (6%) and felt that these were largely 'poor' terms to describe someone with MS. Likewise 'person living with MS' did not find favour (11%). In contrast 'person/people with MS' received a lot of support (34%) but the majority of responders of the surveys (n=396) supported the use of the term 'MSer' (43%) to describe someone with MS. This was considered to be 'good' descriptor along with 'person with MS'. We suggest therefore that 'MSer' can be used as a new descriptor when writing about someone with MS, especially in lay summaries. Furthermore the use of 'patient' and notably 'sufferer' and 'client' should be avoided within both the lay and scientific literature.
authors: Neuroimmunology Unit, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: david.baker@qmul.ac.uk.
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Baker
authors: Shift MS, Leeds, United Kingdom.
authors: George
authors: G
authors: Pepper
authors: Shift MS, Leeds, United Kingdom.
authors: Freddie
authors: F
authors: Yauner
authors: Neuroimmunology Unit, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London E1 2AT, United Kingdom.
authors: Gavin
authors: G
authors: Giovannoni
keywords: Grant reports; Lay reports; Multiple sclerosis; Social media; Survey; Terminology