title: On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.
abstract: The psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm is a dominant research tool in the literature on dual-task performance. In this paradigm a first and second component task (i.e., Task 1 and Task 2) are presented with variable stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and priority to perform Task 1. The main indicator of dual-task impairment in PRP situations is an increasing Task 2-RT with decreasing SOAs. This impairment is typically explained with some task components being processed strictly sequentially in the context of the prominent central bottleneck theory. This assumption could implicitly suggest that processes of Task 1 are unaffected by Task 2 and bottleneck processing, i.e., decreasing SOAs do not increase reaction times (RTs) and error rates of the first task. The aim of the present review is to assess whether PRP dual-task studies included both RT and error data presentations and statistical analyses and whether studies including both data types (i.e., RTs and error rates) show data consistent with this assumption (i.e., decreasing SOAs and unaffected RTs and/or error rates in Task 1). This review demonstrates that, in contrast to RT presentations and analyses, error data is underrepresented in a substantial number of studies. Furthermore, a substantial number of studies with RT and error data showed a statistically significant impairment of Task 1 performance with decreasing SOA. Thus, these studies produced data that is not primarily consistent with the strong assumption that processes of Task 1 are unaffected by Task 2 and bottleneck processing in the context of PRP dual-task situations; this calls for a more careful report and analysis of Task 1 performance in PRP studies and for a more careful consideration of theories proposing additions to the bottleneck assumption, which are sufficiently general to explain Task 1 and Task 2 effects.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin , Berlin, Germany ; Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg , Hamburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Tilo
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Strobach
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin , Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Anja
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schütz
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin , Berlin, Germany.
authors.forename: Torsten
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Schubert
keywords: PRP; capacity limitation; central bottleneck theory; dual tasks; error data; reaction times