title: 3D fluoroscopic image estimation using patient-specific 4DCBCT-based motion models.
abstract: 3D fluoroscopic images represent volumetric patient anatomy during treatment with high spatial and temporal resolution. 3D fluoroscopic images estimated using motion models built using 4DCT images, taken days or weeks prior to treatment, do not reliably represent patient anatomy during treatment. In this study we developed and performed initial evaluation of techniques to develop patient-specific motion models from 4D cone-beam CT (4DCBCT) images, taken immediately before treatment, and used these models to estimate 3D fluoroscopic images based on 2D kV projections captured during treatment. We evaluate the accuracy of 3D fluoroscopic images by comparison to ground truth digital and physical phantom images. The performance of 4DCBCT-based and 4DCT-based motion models are compared in simulated clinical situations representing tumor baseline shift or initial patient positioning errors. The results of this study demonstrate the ability for 4DCBCT imaging to generate motion models that can account for changes that cannot be accounted for with 4DCT-based motion models. When simulating tumor baseline shift and patient positioning errors of up to 5 mm, the average tumor localization error and the 95th percentile error in six datasets were 1.20 and 2.2 mm, respectively, for 4DCBCT-based motion models. 4DCT-based motion models applied to the same six datasets resulted in average tumor localization error and the 95th percentile error of 4.18 and 5.4 mm, respectively. Analysis of voxel-wise intensity differences was also conducted for all experiments. In summary, this study demonstrates the feasibility of 4DCBCT-based 3D fluoroscopic image generation in digital and physical phantoms and shows the potential advantage of 4DCBCT-based 3D fluoroscopic image estimation when there are changes in anatomy between the time of 4DCT imaging and the time of treatment delivery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dhou
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hurwitz
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mishra
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Cai
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rottmann
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wagar
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Berbeco
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ionascu
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Lewis
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D054893:Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000379:methods*; D056973:Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D009038:Motion; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging