title: State constitutional commitment to health and health care and population health outcomes: evidence from historical US data.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  I investigated whether the introduction of health and health care provisions in US state constitutions can make health systems more equitable and improve health outcomes by urging state policymakers and administrative agencies to uphold their human rights obligations at state level.
  
  
  METHODS
  I constructed a panel of infant mortality rates from 50 US states over the period 1929 through 2000 to examine their association with the timing and details of introducing a constitutional right to health and health care provisions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The introduction of a stronger constitutional commitment that obligates state legislature to provide health care was associated with a subsequent reduction in the infant mortality rate of approximately 7.8%. The introduction of provisions explicitly targeting the poor was also associated with a reduction in the infant mortality rate of 6.5%. These health benefits are primarily evident in non-White populations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This empirical result supports Elizabeth Leonard's view that although state constitutional rights have been poorly enforced through the judiciary, a constitutional expression of health care duties has fueled the political and social process, ultimately allowing states to identify the best way to address citizens' health inequality concerns.
authors.affiliation: Hiroaki Matsuura is with the School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: Hiroaki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Matsuura
mesh_terms: D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007226:Infant Mortality / Q000266:history; D011634:Public Health / Q000266:history*; D013219:State Government; D014481:United States