title: Reply to Roberts et al.: CHEERS is Sufficient for Reporting Cost-Benefit Analysis, but May Require Further Elaboration.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, dhusereau@ihe.ca.
authors.forename: Don
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Husereau
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Drummond
authors.forename: Stavros
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Petrou
authors.forename: Dan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Greenberg
authors.forename: Josephine
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mauskopf
authors.forename: Federico
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Augustovski
authors.forename: Andrew H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Briggs
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Moher
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Loder
authors.forename: Chris
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Carswell
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D004470:Economics, Medical; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans