title: Does European patent law unfairly discriminate against medical devices as compared with pharmaceuticals?
abstract: In this article, the question is addressed as to whether European patent law discriminates against medical devices and in favor of pharmaceuticals, and, if so, whether such discrimination is unfair to the medical devices sector. Three forms of discrimination are identified: the availability of Supplementary Protection Certificates for pharmaceuticals; the allowance of first medical indication claims for pharmaceuticals; and the allowance of second and further medical indication claims for pharmaceuticals, now enshrined in the most recent version of the European Patent Convention. The first two forms of discrimination are found to be arguably justifiable, whereas the third is not.
authors.affiliation: Ghent University, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences , Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent , Belgium +32 9 3307507 ; +32 9 2644187 ; sigrid.sterckx@ugent.be.
authors.forename: Sigrid
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sterckx
mesh_terms: D005060:Europe; D006801:Humans; D007880:Legislation, Drug; D062307:Medical Device Legislation; D010330:Patents as Topic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
keywords: Europe; first medical indication claims; medical devices; patents; pharmaceuticals; second medical indication claims; supplementary protection certificates